Restriction of bacteriophage lambda by Escherichia coli K

Derivatives of phage lambda, for which the numbers and positions of the recognition sites for endonuclease R. Eco_k are known, were used as substrates for the Escherichia coli K restriction system in vivo and in vitro. A single unmodified recognition site was sufficient for a DNA molecule to be bound and broken by the K restriction enzyme. Although discrete fragments of DNA were not produced, the breaks were made preferentially in the proximity of the recognition site. Breakage of a DNA molecule with only one recognition site required a 10 to 40-fold higher concentration of restriction enzyme than breakage of a DNA molecule with two or more recognition sites, but these substrates were all equally effective in a binding assay for the enzyme.The polynucleotide kinase reaction provided no evidence for new 5′-terminal sequences generated by restriction in vitro; the 5′ termini were either refractory to the polynucleotide kinase reaction or had no sequence specificity.     

Processing of the abasic sites clustered with the benzo[a]pyrene adducts by the base excision repair enzymes

The major enzyme in eukaryotic cells that catalyzes the cleavage of apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP or abasic) sites is AP endonuclease 1 (APE1) that cleaves the phosphodiester bond on the 5′-side of AP sites. We found that the efficiency of AP site cleavage by APE1 was affected by the benzo[a]pyrenyl-DNA adduct (BPDE-dG) in the opposite strand. AP sites directly opposite of the modified dG or shifted toward the 5′ direction were hydrolyzed by APE1 with an efficiency moderately lower than the AP site in the control DNA duplex, whereas AP sites shifted toward the 3′ direction were hydrolyzed significantly less efficiently. For all DNA structures except DNA with the AP site shifted by 3 nucleotides in the 3′ direction (AP₊₃-BP-DNA), hydrolysis was more efficient in the case of (+)-trans-BPDE-dG. Using molecular dynamic simulation, we have shown that in the complex of APE1 with the AP₊₃-BP-DNA, the BP residue is located within the DNA bend induced by APE1 and contacts the amino acids in the enzyme catalytic center and the catalytic metal ion. The geometry of the APE1 active site is perturbed more significantly by the trans-isomer of BPDE-dG that intercalates into the APE1-DNA complex near the cleaved phosphodiester bond. The ability of DNA polymerases β (Polβ), λ and ι to catalyze gap-filling synthesis in cooperation with APE1 was also analyzed. Polβ was shown to inhibit the 3′ → 5′ exonuclease activity of APE1 when both enzymes were added simultaneously and to insert the correct nucleotide into the gap arising after AP site hydrolysis. Therefore, further evidence for the functional cooperation of APE1 and Polβ in base excision repair was obtained.     

The DNA restriction endonuclease of Escherichia coli B. I. Studies of the DNA translocation and the ATPase activities

Electron microscopic examination of DNA intermediates formed by the restriction endonuclease of Escherichia coli B revealed supercoiled loops that are presumably formed during an ATP-dependent DNA translocation process in which the enzyme remains bound to the recognition site while tracking along the DNA helix to a cleavage site. The rate of DNA translocation during this process is at least 5000 base pairs/min at 37 degrees C. Even after all cleavages have been completed, complexes are seen that contain terminal loops or loop plus tail structures. During this later phase of the reaction, ATP is hydrolyzed at a rate which is dependent upon the size of the largest possible loop (or loop plus tail); this ATP hydrolysis can be terminated by one double-strand cleavage within the loop region between the recognition site and the terminus. To explain these results, it is hypothesized that after cleavage the enzyme cycles between a tracking (and possibly back-tracking) mode which is fueled by ATP hydrolysis and a relatively long static period in which ATP hydrolysis does not occur. While tracking, the enzyme would be bound both to the recognition site and to a distal site but, while static, the enzyme would be bound only at the recognition site of nonlooped molecules. This post-nuclease phase of the reaction is hypothesized to reflect a reaction whereby the enzyme initially scans DNA molecules before making a strand cleavage.     

A specific endonuclease from Brevibacterium albidum

A new restriction-like endonuclease, BalI, has been partially purified from Brevibacterium albidum. This enzyme cleaves bacteriophage λ DNA at least 18 times and adenovirus-2 DNA at least 16 times, but does not cleave simian virus 40 DNA. All sites cleaved by BalI are also cut by the specific endonuclease HaeIII from Haemophilus aegyptius. The recognition sequence of BalI is 5′-T-G-G ↓ C-C-A-3′ 3′-A-C-C ↓ G-G-T-5′ and the cleavage site is indicated by the arrows.     

The DNA sequence on bacteriophage G4 recognized by the Escherichia coli B restriction enzyme.

Bacteriophage G4 possesses a single EcoB site located in the overlap between restriction fragments HinfI-12 and HaeIII-6. The sequence 5′-T-G-A … 8N … T-G-C-T occurs once in this segment and nowhere else in the DNA sequence of G4. Four independent G4 mutants that were not restricted by Escherichia coli B possessed the sequence 5′-T-G-A … 8N … T-G-C-C. The common sequence shared by the previously mapped EcoB sites on φXsB1, simian virus 40, f1, and fd DNAs is 5′-T-G-A … 8N … T-G-C-T … 9N … T. However, the sequence in the region of the G4 EcoB site contains an A instead of the final T conserved in these other examples. When the G4 EcoB site is aligned with the other EcoB sites, there are no conserved residues within 50 bases of the common sequence, 5′-T-G-A … 8N … T-G-C-T, except for those seven residues. The analysis of the EcoB site on G4 provides further evidence that only those seven bases are recognized by the E. coli B restriction enzyme.     

DNA cleavage by type III restriction-modification enzyme EcoP15I is independent of spacer distance between two head to head oriented recognition sites

The type III restriction-modification enzyme EcoP15I requires the interaction of two unmethylated, inversely oriented recognition sites 5'-CAGCAG in head to head configuration to allow an efficient DNA cleavage. It has been hypothesized that two convergent DNA-translocating enzyme-substrate complexes interact to form the active cleavage complex and that translocation is driven by ATP hydrolysis. Using a half-automated, fluorescence-based detection method, we investigated how the distance between two inversely oriented recognition sites affects DNA cleavage efficiency. We determined that EcoP15I cleaves DNA efficiently even for two adjacent head to head or tail to tail oriented target sites. Hence, DNA translocation appears not to be required for initiating DNA cleavage in these cases. Furthermore, we report here that EcoP15I is able to cleave single-site substrates. When we analyzed the interaction of EcoP15I with DNA substrates containing adjacent target sites in the presence of non-hydrolyzable ATP analogues, we found that cleavage depended on the hydrolysis of ATP. Moreover, we show that cleavage occurs at only one of the two possible cleavage positions of an interacting pair of target sequences. When EcoP15I bound to a DNA substrate containing one recognition site in the absence of ATP, we observed a 36 nucleotide DNaseI-footprint that is asymmetric on both strands. All of our footprinting experiments showed that the enzyme did not cover the region around the cleavage site. Analyzing a DNA fragment with two head to head oriented recognition sites, EcoP15I protected 27-33 nucleotides around the recognition sequence, including an additional region of 26 bp between both cleavage sites. For all DNA substrates examined, the presence of ATP caused altered footprinting patterns. We assume that the altered patterns are most likely due to a conformational change of the enzyme. Overall, our data further refine the tracking-collision model for type III restriction enzymes.     

S-adenosyl methionine prevents promiscuous DNA cleavage by the EcoP1I type III restriction enzyme

DNA cleavage by the type III restriction endonuclease EcoP1I was analysed on circular and catenane DNA in a variety of buffers with different salts. In the presence of the cofactor S-adenosyl methionine (AdoMet), and irrespective of buffer, only substrates with two EcoP1I sites in inverted repeat were susceptible to cleavage. Maximal activity was achieved at a Res2Mod2 to site ratio of approximately 1:1 yet resulted in cleavage at only one of the two sites. In contrast, the outcome of reactions in the absence of AdoMet was dependent upon the identity of the monovalent buffer components, in particular the identity of the cation. With Na+, cleavage was observed only on substrates with two sites in inverted repeat at elevated enzyme to site ratios (>15:1). However, with K+ every substrate tested was susceptible to cleavage above an enzyme to site ratio of approximately 3:1, including a DNA molecule with two directly repeated sites and even a DNA molecule with a single site. Above an enzyme to site ratio of 2:1, substrates with two sites in inverted repeat were cleaved at both cognate sites. The rates of cleavage suggested two separate events: a fast primary reaction for the first cleavage of a pair of inverted sites; and an order-of-magnitude slower secondary reaction for the second cleavage of the pair or for the first cleavage of all other site combinations. EcoP1I enzymes mutated in either the ATPase or nuclease motifs did not produce the secondary cleavage reactions. Thus, AdoMet appears to play a dual role in type III endonuclease reactions: Firstly, as an allosteric activator, promoting DNA association; and secondly, as a "specificity factor", ensuring that cleavage occurs only when two endonucleases bind two recognition sites in a designated orientation. However, given the right conditions, AdoMet is not strictly required for DNA cleavage by a type III enzyme.     

Repercussions of DNA tracking by the type IC restriction endonuclease EcoR124I on linear, circular and catenated substrates.

Type I restriction endonucleases such as EcoR124I cleave DNA at undefined loci, distant from their recognition sequences, by a mechanism that involves the enzyme tracking along the DNA between recognition and cleavage sites. This mechanism was examined on plasmids that carried recognition sites for EcoR124I and recombination sites for resolvase, the latter to create DNA catenanes. Supercoiled substrates with either one or two restriction sites were linearized by EcoR124I at similar rates, although the two-site molecule underwent further cleavage more readily than the one-site DNA. The catenane from the plasmid with one EcoR124I site, carrying the site on the smaller of the two rings, was cleaved by EcoR124I exclusively in the small ring, and this underwent multiple cleavage akin to the two-site plasmid. Linear substrates derived from the plasmids were cleaved by EcoR124I at very slow rates. The communication between recognition and cleavage sites therefore cannot stem from random looping. Instead, it must follow the DNA contour between the sites. On a circular DNA, the translocation of non-specific DNA past the specifically bound protein should increase negative supercoiling in one domain and decrease it in the other. The ensuing topological barrier may be the trigger for DNA cleavage.     

Unidirectional translocation from recognition site and a necessary interaction with DNA end for cleavage by Type III restriction enzyme

Type III restriction enzymes have been demonstrated to require two unmethylated asymmetric recognition sites oriented head-to-head to elicit double-strand break 25–27 bp downstream of one of the two sites. The proposed DNA cleavage mechanism involves ATP-dependent DNA translocation. The sequence context of the recognition site was suggested to influence the site of DNA cleavage by the enzyme. In this investigation, we demonstrate that the cleavage site of the R.EcoP15I restriction enzyme does not depend on the sequence context of the recognition site. Strikingly, this study demonstrates that the enzyme can cleave linear DNA having either recognition sites in the same orientation or a single recognition site. Cleavage occurs predominantly at a site proximal to the DNA end in the case of multiple site substrates. Such cleavage can be abolished by the binding of Lac repressor downstream (3′ side) but not upstream (5′ side) of the recognition site. Binding of HU protein has also been observed to interfere with R.EcoP15I cleavage activity. In accordance with a mechanism requiring two enzyme molecules cooperating to elicit double-strand break on DNA, our results convincingly demonstrate that the enzyme translocates on DNA in a 5′ to 3′ direction from its recognition site and indicate a switch in the direction of enzyme motion at the DNA ends. This study demonstrates a new facet in the mode of action of these restriction enzymes.     

Methylation and cleavage sequences of the EcoP1 restriction-modification enzyme.

EcoP1 is a restriction modification enzyme encoded by bacteriophage P1. It requires ATP for cleavage and S-adenosyl methionine for methylation of DNA. We have mapped the sites of both cleavage and methylation in simian virus 40 DNA and determined their sequences. The enzyme methylates the sequence A-G-mA-C-C and cuts the DNA 25 to 27 base-pairs from the site of methylation in the 3′ direction, with a two to four base-pair stagger between cuts. Consistent with the fact that the methylation sequence is asymmetric, the enzyme methylates only one strand in vitro. One variant of simian virus 40 has acquired an additional EcoP1 methylation and cleavage site by changing a A-G-A-A-C sequence to A-G-A-C-C.     

2′-O-methyl nucleotide modified DNA substrates influence the cleavage efficiencies of BamHI and BglII

Induction of endonucleolytic DNA cleavage is an essential event that links the initiating stimuli to the final effects of cells. The cleavage efficiency and thus the final yield could be affected by many factors, including structures of DNA substrates, composite structures of enzymes–substrates or enzymes–nucleic analogs and so on. However, it is not clear whether a nucleotide derivative-substituted in DNA substrates can influence the efficiency of enzymatic cleavage. To investigate the effect of sugar pucker conformation on DNA–protein interactions, we used 2′-O-methyl modified nucleotides (OMeN) to modify DNA substrates of isocaudemers BamHI and BglII in this study, and used FRET assay as an efficient method for analysis of enzyme cleavage. Experimental results demonstrated that OMeN-substituted recognition sequences influenced the cleavage rates significantly in a position-dependent manner. OMeN substitutions can reduce the cleavage as expected. Surprisingly, OMeN substitutions can also enhance the cleavage rates. The kinetics parameters of V _max and K _m have been obtained by fitting the Michaelis-Menten kinetic equation. These 2'-OMe nucleotides could behave as a regulatory element to modulate the enzymatic activity in vitro, and this property could enrich our understanding about the endonuclease cleavage mechanism and enhance our ability to regulate the enzymatic cleavage efficiency for applications in synthetic biology.     

DNA communications by Type III restriction endonucleases--confirmation of 1D translocation over 3D looping

DNA cleavage by Type III restriction enzymes is governed strictly by the relative arrangement of recognition sites on a DNA substrate—endonuclease activity is usually only triggered by sequences in head-to-head orientation. Tens to thousands of base pairs can separate these sites. Long distance communication over such distances could occur by either one-dimensional (1D) DNA translocation or 3D DNA looping. To distinguish between these alternatives, we analysed the activity of EcoPI and EcoP15I on DNA catenanes in which the recognition sites were either on the same or separate rings. While substrates with a pair of sites located on the same ring were cleaved efficiently, catenanes with sites on separate rings were not cleaved. These results exclude a simple 3D DNA-looping activity. To characterize the interactions further, EcoPI was incubated with plasmids carrying two recognition sites interspersed with two 21res sites for site-specific recombination by Tn21 resolvase; inhibition of recombination would indicate the formation of stable DNA loops. No inhibition was observed, even under conditions where EcoPI translocation could also occur.     

Tailoring the activity of restriction endonuclease PleI by PNA-induced DNA looping

DNA looping is one of the key factors allowing proteins bound to different DNA sites to signal one another via direct contacts. We demonstrate that DNA looping can be generated in an arbitrary chosen site by sequence-directed targeting of double-stranded DNA with pseudocomplementary peptide-nucleic acids (pcPNAs). We designed pcPNAs to mask the DNA from cleavage by type IIs restriction enzyme PleI while not preventing the enzyme from binding to its primary DNA recognition site. Direct interaction between two protein molecules (one bound to the original recognition site and the other to a sequence-degenerated site) results in a totally new activity of PleI: it produces a nick near the degenerate site. The PNA-induced nicking efficiency varies with the distance between the two protein-binding sites in a phase with the DNA helical periodicity. Our findings imply a general approach for the fine-tuning of proteins bound to DNA sites well separated along the DNA chain.     

Structural Requirements forFokI-DNA Interaction and Oligodeoxyribonucleotide-instructed Cleavage

TheFokI restriction endonuclease recognizes the double-stranded (ds) 5′-GGATG-3′ site and cuts at the 9th and 13th nucleotides downstream from the 5′-3′ and 3′-5′ strands, respectively. To elucidate the interaction betweenFokI and DNA, and the effect of Mg²⁺on this interaction, we usedFokI with various combinations of dsDNA, single-stranded (ss) DNA and oligodeoxyribonucleotides (oligos) containing a double-stranded hairpin carrying theFokI recognition site. Oligo- and dsDNA-FokI interactions showed that for fully effective recognition, two or more base-pairs were required outside the 5′-GGATG-3′ site. When usingFokI with ssDNA and oligos, precise cutting with no observable byproducts was observed at the 9th or 13th nucleotide. This was independent of whether the region between the recognition and cut sites was perfectly complementary or whether there were up to four mismatches in this region, or a single mismatch within the cut site. Moreover,FokI cleavage, when followed by step-wise filling-in ofFokI cohesive ends in the dsDNA, allowedFokI to recleave such sites when two or more nucleotides were added, releasing 2-mer, 3-mer, or 4-mer single-stranded chains. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays showed that the DNA helix was bent when complexed withFokI (without Mg²⁺). Such a complex, when formed in the absence of Mg²⁺, did not accept the subsequently added Mg²⁺for several minutes. This suggests a tight, diffusion-resistant contact between the enzyme and the cognate DNA sequence. In the presence of Mg²⁺, the half-life of the complexFokI and dsDNA was 12 minutes at 22°C. In the absence of Mg²⁺, such a complex, possessing a terminally located 5′-GGATG-3′ site, had a half-life of 1.5 to 2 minutes. However, if magnesium ions were present, this complex had a stability similar to that of a complex formed with dsDNA containing a centrally located 5′-GGATG-3′ site.     

Studies of simian virus 40 DNA. VII. A cleavage map of the SV40 genome

A physical map of the Simian virus 40 genome has been constructed on the basis of specific cleavage of Simian virus 40 DNA by bacterial restriction endonucleases. The 11 fragments produced by enzyme from Hemophilus influenzae have been ordered by analysis of partial digest products and by analysis of an overlapping set of fragments produced by enzyme from Hemophilus parainfluenzae. In addition, the single site in SV40 DNA cleaved by the Escherichia coli R_I restriction endonuclease has been located. With this site as a reference point, the H. influenzae cleavage sites and the H. parainfluenzae cleavage sites have been localized on the map.     

Sequence specificity of DNA methylases from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus brevis

DNA methylation in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens strain H (Bam)² and Bacillus brevis (Bbv) has been examined by a variety of techniques. In vivo labelling studies revealed that Bam DNA contains no N⁶-methyladenine (MeAde), but contains 5-methylcytosine (MeCyt); approximately 0·7% of the cytosine residues are methylated.DNA methylase activity was partially purified from both Bam and Bbv; the Bam enzyme preparation transferred methyl groups from S-adenosyl-l-[methyl-³H]methionine ([³H]AdoMet) to specific DNA cytosine residues only; in agreement with Vanyushin & Dobritsa (1975), the Bbv enzyme preparation methylated both DNA adenine and cytosine residues. The (partial) sequence specificity of the methylases was determined by analyzing [³H]methyl-labelled dinucleotides obtained from enzymatic digests of DNA methylated in vitro. Bam and Bbv each contain a DNA-cytosine methylase with overlapping sequence specificity; e.g. both enzymes produce G-C1, C1-A and C1-T. This is consistent with a single, twofold symmetrical methylation sequence of 5′ … G-C1-(A or T)-G-C … 3′; this was observed by Vanyushin & Dobritsa (1975) for a different Bbv strain. Bam contains a second DNA-cytosine methylase (not present in Bbv), which produces T-C1 and C1-T. We propose that this methylase is the BamI modification enzyme, and that the modified sequence is 5′ … G-G-A-T-C1-C … 3′.Bbv appears to contain two DNA-adenine methylases which produce the (partial) methylated sequences, 5′ … G-A1-T … 3′ and 5′ … A-A1-G … 3′, respectively; in the former case, all the G-A-T-C sites on Bbv DNA appear to be methylated.     

Relaxase DNA Binding and Cleavage Are Two Distinguishable Steps in Conjugative DNA Processing That Involve Different Sequence Elements of the nic Site

TrwC, the relaxase of plasmid R388, catalyzes a series of concerted DNA cleavage and strand transfer reactions on a specific site (nic) of its origin of transfer (oriT). nic contains the cleavage site and an adjacent inverted repeat (IR₂). Mutation analysis in the nic region indicated that recognition of the IR₂ proximal arm and the nucleotides located between IR₂ and the cleavage site were essential for supercoiled DNA processing, as judged either by in vitro nic cleavage or by mobilization of a plasmid containing oriT. Formation of the IR₂ cruciform and recognition of the distal IR₂ arm and loop were not necessary for these reactions to take place. On the other hand, IR₂ was not involved in TrwC single-stranded DNA processing in vitro. For single-stranded DNA nic cleavage, TrwC recognized a sequence embracing six nucleotides upstream of the cleavage site and two nucleotides downstream. This suggests that TrwC DNA binding and cleavage are two distinguishable steps in conjugative DNA processing and that different sequence elements are recognized by TrwC in each step. IR₂-proximal arm recognition was crucial for the initial supercoiled DNA binding. Subsequent recognition of the adjacent single-stranded DNA binding site was required to position the cleavage site in the active center of the protein so that the nic cleavage reaction could take place.     

Real-time observation of DNA looping dynamics of Type IIE restriction enzymes NaeI and NarI

Many restriction enzymes require binding of two copies of a recognition sequence for DNA cleavage, thereby introducing a loop in the DNA. We investigated looping dynamics of Type IIE restriction enzymes NaeI and NarI by tracking the Brownian motion of single tethered DNA molecules. DNA containing two endonuclease recognition sites spaced a few 100 bp apart connect small polystyrene beads to a glass surface. The position of a bead is tracked through video microscopy. Protein-mediated looping and unlooping is then observed as a sudden specific change in Brownian motion of the bead. With this method we are able to directly follow DNA looping kinetics of single protein–DNA complexes to obtain loop stability and loop formation times. We show that, in the absence of divalent cations, NaeI induces DNA loops of specific size. In contrast, under these conditions NarI mainly creates non-specific loops, resulting in effective DNA compaction for higher enzyme concentrations. Addition of Ca²⁺ increases the NaeI-DNA loop lifetime by two orders of magnitude and stimulates specific binding by NarI. Finally, for both enzymes we observe exponentially distributed loop formation times, indicating that looping is dominated by (re)binding the second recognition site.     

Functional cooperation between exonucleases and endonucleases--basis for the evolution of restriction enzymes

Many types of restriction enzymes cleave DNA away from their recognition site. Using the type III restriction enzyme, EcoP15I, which cleaves DNA 25–27 bp away from its recognition site, we provide evidence to show that an intact recognition site on the cleaved DNA sequesters the restriction enzyme and decreases the effective concentration of the enzyme. EcoP15I restriction enzyme is shown here to perform only a single round of DNA cleavage. Significantly, we show that an exonuclease activity is essential for EcoP15I restriction enzyme to perform multiple rounds of DNA cleavage. This observation may hold true for all restriction enzymes cleaving DNA sufficiently far away from their recognition site. Our results highlight the importance of functional cooperation in the modulation of enzyme activity. Based on results presented here and other data on well-characterised restriction enzymes, a functional evolutionary hierarchy of restriction enzymes is discussed.     

In vitro methylation of bacteriophage lambda DNA by wild type (dam+) and mutant (damh) forms of the phage T2 DNA adenine methylase.

The wild-type (dam⁺) and mutant (dam^h) forms of the bacteriophage T2 DNA adenine methylase have been partially purified; these enzymes methylate the sequence, 5/t' … G-A-Py … 3′ (Hattman et al., 1978a). However, in vitro methylation studies using phage λ DNA revealed the following: (1) T2 dam⁺ and dam^h enzymes differ in their ability to methylate λ DNA; under identical reaction conditions the T2 dam^h enzyme methylated λ DNA to a higher level than did the dam⁺ enzyme. However, the respective methylation sites are equally distributed on the l and r strands. (2) Methylation with T2 dam^h, but not T2 dam⁺ protected λ against P1 restriction. This was demonstrated by transfection of Escherichia coli (P1) spheroplasts and by cleavage with R·EcoP1. (3) T2 dam⁺ and dam^h were similarly capable of methylating G-A-T-C sequences on λ DNA; e.g. λ·dam₃ DNA (contains no N⁶-methyladonine) methylated with either enzyme was made resistant to cleavage by R·DpnII. In contrast, only the T2 dam^h modified DNA was resistant to further methylation by M·EcoP1 (which methylates the sequence 5′ … A-G-A-C-Py … 3′; Hattman et al., 1978b). (4) λ·dam₃ DNA was partially methylated to the same level with T2 dam⁺ or T2 dam^h; the two enzymes produced different patterns of G-A-C versus G-A-T methylation. We propose that the T2 dam⁺ enzyme methylates G-A-C sequences less efficiently than the T2 dam^h methylase; this property does not entirely account for the large difference in methylation levels produced by the two enzymes.