The glutamine residue of the conserved GGQ motif in Saccharomyces cerevisiae release factor eRF1 is methylated by the product of the YDR140w gene

Polypeptide release factors from eubacteria and eukaryotes, although similar in function, belong to different protein families. They share one sequence motif, a GGQ tripeptide that is vital to release factor (RF) activity in both kingdoms. In bacteria, the Gln residue of the motif in RF1 and RF2 is modified to N(5)-methyl-Gln by the S-adenosyl l-methionine-dependent methyltransferase PrmC and the absence of Gln methylation decreases the release activity of Escherichia coli RF2 in vitro severalfold. We show here that the same modification is made to the GGQ motif of Saccharomyces cerevisiae release factor eRF1, the first time that N(5)-methyl-Gln has been found outside the bacterial kingdom. The product of the YDR140w gene is required for the methylation of eRF1 in vivo and for optimal yeast cell growth. YDR140w protein has significant homology to PrmC but lacks the N-terminal domain thought to be involved in the recognition of the bacterial release factors. Overproduced in S. cerevisiae, YDR140w can methylate eRF1 from yeast or man in vitro using S-adenosyl l-methionine as methyl donor provided that eRF3 and GTP are also present, suggesting that the natural substrate of the methyltransferase YDR140w is the ternary complex eRF1.eRF3.GTP.     

八肋游仆虫两类释放因子的相互作用

从八肋游仆虫中克隆到两类释放因子基因Eo-eRFI和Eo-eRF3。在Eo-eRF3基因的阅读框中有3个通用的终止密码子UGA,在此编码半胱氨酸。为了研究两类释放因子的相互作用,用PCR的方法对3个位点进行了定点突变,将UGA突变为通用的编码半胱氨酸的密码子UGU。突变结果经测序确认后,在大肠杆菌中获得全长Eo-eRF3的正确表达。在此基础上,构建酵母双杂交重组质粒,用该系统检测了游仆虫两类释放因子的相互作用。结果显示,两类释放因子在生物体内形成复合体,从而在较原始的真核生物中,证实了两类释放因子的相互作用关系。     

Termination of translation in eukaryotes is governed by two interacting polypeptide chain release factors, eRF1 and eRF3.

Termination of translation in higher organisms is a GTP-dependent process. However, in the structure of the single polypeptide chain release factor known so far (eRF1) there are no GTP binding motifs. Moreover, in prokaryotes, a GTP binding protein, RF3, stimulates translation termination. From these observations we proposed that a second eRF should exist, conferring GTP dependence for translation termination. Here, we have shown that the newly sequenced GTP binding Sup35-like protein from Xenopus laevis, termed eRF3, exhibits in vitro three important functional properties: (i) although being inactive as an eRF on its own, it greatly stimulates eRF1 activity in the presence of GTP and low concentrations of stop codons, resembling the properties of prokaryotic RF3; (ii) it binds and probably hydrolyses GTP; and (iii) it binds to eRF1. The structure of the C-domain of the X.laevis eRF3 protein is highly conserved with other Sup35-like proteins, as was also shown earlier for the eRF1 protein family. From these and our previous data, we propose that yeast Sup45 and Sup35 proteins belonging to eRF1 and eRF3 protein families respectively are also yeast termination factors. The absence of structural resemblance of eRF1 and eRF3 to prokaryotic RF1/2 and RF3 respectively, may point to the different evolutionary origin of the translation termination machinery in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. It is proposed that a quaternary complex composed of eRF1, eRF3, GTP and a stop codon of the mRNA is involved in termination of polypeptide synthesis in ribosomes.     

Eukaryotic release factors (eRFs) history

In the present review, we describe the history of the identification of the eukaryotic translation termination factors eRF1 and eRF3. As in the case of several proteins involved in general and essential processes in all cells (e.g., DNA replication, gene expression regulation.) the strategies and methodologies used to identify these release factors were first established in prokaryotes. The genetic investigations in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have made a major contribution in the field. A large amount of data have been produced, from which it was concluded that the SUP45 and SUP35 genes were controlling translation termination but were also involved in other functions important for the cell organization and the cell cycle accomplishment. This does not seem to be restricted to yeast but is also probably the case in eukaryotes in general. The biochemical studies of the proteins encoded by the higher eukaryote homologs of SUP45 and SUP35 were efficient and permitted the identification of eRF1 as being the key protein in the termination process, eRF3 having a stimulating role. Around 25 years were needed after the identification of sup45 and sup35 mutants for the characterization of their gene products as eRF1 and eRF3, respectively. It also has to be pointed out that if the results came first from bacteria, the identification of RF3 and eRF3 was made practically at the same time. Moreover, eRF1 was the first crystal structure obtained for a class-1 release factor, the bacterial RF2 structure came later. The goal is now to understand at the molecular level the roles of both eRF1 and eRF3 in addition to their translation termination functions.     

Termination of translation: interplay of mRNA,rRNAs and release factors?

Termination of translation in eukaryotes has focused recently on functional anatomy of polypeptide chain release factor, eRF1, by using a variety of different approaches. The tight correlation between the domain structure and different functions of eRF1 has been revealed. Independently, the role of prokaryotic RF1/2 in GTPase activity of RF3 has been deciphered, as well as RF3 function itself.     

Monoclonal antibodies against human translation termination factor eRF3 and their utilization for sub-cellular localization of eRF3

Eukaryotic translation termination is triggered by peptide release factors eRF1 and eRF3. eRF1 recognizes the stop codon and promotes nascent peptide chain release, while eRF3 facilitates this peptide release in a GTP-dependent manner. In addition to its role in termination, eRF3 is involved in normal and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay. Despite extensive investigation, the complete understanding of eRF3 function have been hampered by the lack of specific anti-eRF3 monoclonal antibodies (Mabs). The purpose of the study was production of recombinant eRF3a/GSPT1, development of anti-eRF3a/GSPT1 Mabs and their utilization for eRF3a/GSPT1 sub-cellular localization. Plasmid encoding C-terminal part of human GSPT1/eRF3a was constructed. Purified protein, which was predominantly present in the inclusion bodies, was used for the development of Mabs. Characterization of the regions recognized by Mabs using GSPT1/eRF3a mutants and its visualization in the 3D space suggested that Mabs recognize different epitopes. Consistent with its function in translational termination, immunostaining of the cells with developed Mabs revealed that the endogenous GSPT1/eRF3a localized in endoplasmic reticulum. Taking into account the important role of eRF3 for the fundamental research one can suggests that developed Mabs have great prospective to be used as a research reagent in a wide range of applications.     

GTP-dependent structural rearrangement of the eRF1:eRF3 complex and eRF3 sequence motifs essential for PABP binding

Translation termination in eukaryotes is governed by the concerted action of eRF1 and eRF3 factors. eRF1 recognizes the stop codon in the A site of the ribosome and promotes nascent peptide chain release, and the GTPase eRF3 facilitates this peptide release via its interaction with eRF1. In addition to its role in termination, eRF3 is involved in normal and nonsense-mediated mRNA decay through its association with cytoplasmic poly(A)-binding protein (PABP) via PAM2-1 and PAM2-2 motifs in the N-terminal domain of eRF3. We have studied complex formation between full-length eRF3 and its ligands (GDP, GTP, eRF1 and PABP) using isothermal titration calorimetry, demonstrating formation of the eRF1:eRF3:PABP:GTP complex. Analysis of the temperature dependence of eRF3 interactions with G nucleotides reveals major structural rearrangements accompanying formation of the eRF1:eRF3:GTP complex. This is in contrast to eRF1:eRF3:GDP complex formation, where no such rearrangements were detected. Thus, our results agree with the established active role of GTP in promoting translation termination. Through point mutagenesis of PAM2-1 and PAM2-2 motifs in eRF3, we demonstrate that PAM2-2, but not PAM2-1 is indispensible for eRF3:PABP complex formation.     

人eRF3a与survivinSE互作用的结构域分析

第二类肽链释放因子eRF3（eukaryotic polypeptide release factor）是一种GTPase,它促进第一类肽链释放因子eRFl的释放活性,并与细胞周期调控、细胞骨架组装、细胞凋亡和肿瘤形成等过程相关。哺乳动物细胞中eRF3有两种——eRF3a和eRF3b,分别由GSPTl和GSPT2（G1 to Sphase transition 1／2）基因编码。生存素（survivin）是迄今发现的最强有力的凋亡抑制因子,具有独特的结构和复杂的功能,不仅可以抑制细胞凋亡,还参与细胞有丝分裂、血管的生成等过程。eRF3和survivin都与细胞周期和细胞凋亡的调控相关。该实验室的前期研究表明,eRF3和survivin具有相互作用关系。该研究进一步对eRF3a进行截短突变。采用酵母双杂交和pull．down两种分析方法依次验证eRF3a（1．72aa）和eRF3a（1—36aa）与survivin的相互作用关系。结果表明,eRF3a（1．72aa）和eRF3a（1—36aa）均可以与survivin相互作用,由此确定eRF3a与survivinf相互作用的最小结构域位于其N末端1-36aa之间,从而为进一步证实eRF3a的N端结构域与survivin协同作用参与细胞周期和细胞凋亡的调控提供了数据支持。     

Eukaryotic Release Factor 3 Is Required for Multiple Turnovers of Peptide Release Catalysis by Eukaryotic Release Factor 1

Eukaryotic peptide release factor 3 (eRF3) is a conserved, essential gene in eukaryotes implicated in translation termination. We have systematically measured the contribution of eRF3 to the rates of peptide release with both saturating and limiting levels of eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1). Although eRF3 modestly stimulates the absolute rate of peptide release (∼5-fold), it strongly increases the rate of peptide release when eRF1 is limiting (>20-fold). This effect was generalizable across all stop codons and in a variety of contexts. Further investigation revealed that eRF1 remains associated with ribosomal complexes after peptide release and subunit dissociation and that eRF3 promotes the dissociation of eRF1 from these post-termination complexes. These data are consistent with models where eRF3 principally affects binding interactions between eRF1 and the ribosome, either prior to or subsequent to peptide release. A role for eRF3 as an escort for eRF1 into its fully accommodated state is easily reconciled with its close sequence similarity to the translational GTPase EFTu.     

Mutations in the highly conserved GGQ motif of class 1 polypeptide release factors abolish ability of human eRF1 to trigger peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis.

Although the primary structures of class 1 polypeptide release factors (RF1 and RF2 in prokaryotes, eRF1 in eukaryotes) are known, the molecular basis by which they function in translational termination remains obscure. Because all class 1 RFs promote a stop-codon-dependent and ribosome-dependent hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNAs, one may anticipate that this common function relies on a common structural motif(s). We have compared amino acid sequences of the available class 1 RFs and found a novel, common, unique, and strictly conserved GGQ motif that should be in a loop (coil) conformation as deduced by programs predicting protein secondary structure. Site-directed mutagenesis of the human eRF1 as a representative of class 1 RFs shows that substitution of both glycyl residues in this motif, G183 and G184, causes complete inactivation of the protein as a release factor toward all three stop codons, whereas two adjacent amino acid residues, G181 and R182, are functionally nonessential. Inactive human eRF1 mutants compete in release assays with wild-type eRF1 and strongly inhibit their release activity. Mutations of the glycyl residues in this motif do not affect another function, the ability of eRF1 together with the ribosome to induce GTPase activity of human eRF3, a class 2 RF. We assume that the novel highly conserved GGQ motif is implicated directly or indirectly in the activity of class 1 RFs in translation termination.     

Release factors eRF1 and RF2: a universal mechanism controls the large conformational changes

Class I release factors 1 and 2 (RF1 and RF2) terminate protein synthesis by recognizing stop codons on the mRNA via their conserved amino acid motifs (NIKS in eRF1 and SPF in RF2) and by the conserved tripeptide (GGQ) interactions with the ribosomal peptidyltransferase center. Crystal structures of eRF1 and RF2 do not fit their ribosomal binding pocket (approximately 73 angstroms). Cryoelectron microscopy indicates large conformational changes in the ribosome-bound RF2. Here, we investigate the conformational dynamics of the eRF1 and RF2 using molecular dynamics simulation, structural alignment, and electrostatic analysis of domain interactions. We show that relaxed eRF1 has a shape remarkably similar to the ribosome-bound RF2 observed by cryoelectron microscopy. The similarity between the two release factors is as good as between elongation factor G and elongation factor Tu-guanosine-5'(beta,gamma-imido)triphosphate-tRNA. Further, the conformational transitions and dynamics of eRF1 and RF2 between the free and ribosome-bound states are most likely controlled by protonation of conserved histidines. For eRF1, the distance between the NIKS and GGQ motifs shrinks from 97.5 angstroms in the crystal to 70-80 angstroms. For RF2, the separation between SPF and GGQ elongates from 32 angstroms in the crystal to 50 angstroms. Coulombic interaction strongly favors the open conformation of eRF1; however, solvation and histidine protonation modulate the domain interactions, making the closed conformation of eRF1 more accessible. Thus, RF1 and RF2 function like molecular machines, most likely fueled by histidine protonation. The unified conformational control and the shapes of eRF1 and RF2 support the proposition that the termination of protein synthesis involves similar mechanisms across species.     

A posttermination ribosomal complex is the guanine nucleotide exchange factor for peptide release factor RF3

The mechanism by which peptide release factor RF3 recycles RF1 and RF2 has been clarified and incorporated in a complete scheme for translation termination. Free RF3 is in vivo stably bound to GDP, and ribosomes in complex with RF1 or RF2 act as guanine nucleotide exchange factors (GEF). Hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA by RF1 or RF2 allows GTP binding to RF3 on the ribosome. This induces an RF3 conformation with high affinity for ribosomes and leads to rapid dissociation of RF1 or RF2. Dissociation of RF3 from the ribosome requires GTP hydrolysis. Our data suggest that RF3 and its eukaryotic counterpart, eRF3, have mechanistic principles in common.     

Evolution of the translation termination factors

During of protein synthesis, or translation, four stages are usually recognized: initiation, elongation, termination, and recycling. Translation termination involves two protein types, the factors of termination of the first class participate in recognition of stop-codons and the termination factors of the second class are GTP-ases, which stimulate activity of the first class factors. Bacteria have two proteins of class 1, RF1 and RF2 (release factor), with overlapping codon specificity; both factors are capable to recognize the codon UAA, while the codons UAG and UGA are only decoded by RF1 and RF2, respectively. In addition, bacteria contain one factor of class 2, RF3, which not only stimulates activity of RF1 and RF2, but also promotes release of the first class factors after completion of termination. In contrast to prokaryotes, eukaryotic organisms have only one termination factor of class 1, eRF1. This protein recognizes each of the three stop-codons, which results in hydrolysis of peptidyl-tRNA. Eukaryotic cells also have only one factor of class 2, eRF3.     

Class I release factors in ciliates with variant genetic codes

In eukaryotes with the universal genetic code a single class I release factor (eRF1) most probably recognizes all stop codons (UAA, UAG and UGA) and is essential for termination of nascent peptide synthesis. It is well established that stop codons have been reassigned to amino acid codons at least three times among ciliates. The codon specificities of ciliate eRF1s must have been modified to accommodate the variant codes. In this study we have amplified, cloned and sequenced eRF1 genes of two hypotrichous ciliates, Oxytricha trifallax (UAA and UAG for Gln) and Euplotes aediculatus (UGA for Cys). We also sequenced/identified three protist and two archaeal class I RF genes to enlarge the database of eRF1/aRF1s with the universal code. Extensive comparisons between universal code eRF1s and those of Oxytricha, Euplotes, and Tetrahymena which represent three lineages that acquired variant codes independently, provide important clues to identify stop codon-binding regions in eRF1. Domain 1 in the five ciliate eRF1s, particularly the TASNIKS heptapeptide and its adjacent region, differs significantly from domain 1 in universal code eRF1s. This observation suggests that domain 1 contains the codon recognition site, but that the mechanism of eRF1 codon recognition may be more complex than proposed by Nakamura et al. or Knight and Landweber.     

Structure of a human translation termination complex

In contrast to bacteria that have two release factors, RF1 and RF2, eukaryotes only possess one unrelated release factor eRF1, which recognizes all three stop codons of the mRNA and hydrolyses the peptidyl-tRNA bond. While the molecular basis for bacterial termination has been elucidated, high-resolution structures of eukaryotic termination complexes have been lacking. Here we present a 3.8 Å structure of a human translation termination complex with eRF1 decoding a UAA(A) stop codon. The complex was formed using the human cytomegalovirus (hCMV) stalling peptide, which perturbs the peptidyltransferase center (PTC) to silence the hydrolysis activity of eRF1. Moreover, unlike sense codons or bacterial stop codons, the UAA stop codon adopts a U-turn-like conformation within a pocket formed by eRF1 and the ribosome. Inducing the U-turn conformation for stop codon recognition rationalizes how decoding by eRF1 includes monitoring geometry in order to discriminate against sense codons.     

Molecular Morphology of Eukaryotic Class-1 Translation Termination Factor eRF1 in Solution

The integral structural parameters and the shape of the molecule of human translation termination factor eRF1 were determined from the small-angle X-ray scattering in solution. The molecular shapes were found by bead modeling with nonlinear minimization of the root-mean-square deviation of the calculated from the experimental scattering curve. Comparisons of the small-angle scattering curves computed for atomic-resolution structures of eRF1 with the experimental data on scattering from solution testified that the crystal and the solution conformations are close. In the ribosome, the distance between the eRF1 motifs GGQ and NIKS must be shorter than in crystal or solution (75 versus 100–107 Å). Therefore, like its bacterial counterpart RF2, the eukaryotic eRF1 must change its conformation as it binds to the ribosome. The conformational mobility of eukaryotic and prokaryotic class-1 release factors is another feature making them functionally akin to tRNA.     

Molecular morphology of eukaryotic class I translation termination factor eRF1 in solution

The integral structural parameters and the shape of the molecule of human translation termination factor eRF1 were determined from the small-angle X-ray scattering in solution. The molecular shapes were found by bead modeling with nonlinear minimization of the root-mean-square deviation of the calculated from the experimental scattering curve. Comparisons of the small-angle scattering curves computed for atomic-resolution structures of eRF1 with the experimental data on scattering from solution testified that the crystal and the solution conformations are close. In the ribosome, the distance between the eRF1 motifs GGQ and NIKS must be shorter than in crystal or solution (75 versus 107-112 A). Therefore, like its bacterial counterpart RF2, the eukaryotic eRF1 must change its conformation as it binds to the ribosome. The conformational mobility of eukaryotic and prokaryotic class-1 release factors is another feature making them functionally akin to tRNA.     

Involvement of human release factors eRF3a and eRF3b in translation termination and regulation of the termination complex formation

eRF3 is a GTPase associated with eRF1 in a complex that mediates translation termination in eukaryotes. In mammals, two genes encode two distinct forms of eRF3, eRF3a and eRF3b, which differ in their N-terminal domains. Both bind eRF1 and stimulate its release activity in vitro. However, whether both proteins can function as termination factors in vivo has not been determined. In this study, we used short interfering RNAs to examine the effect of eRF3a and eRF3b depletion on translation termination efficiency in human cells. By measuring the readthrough at a premature nonsense codon in a reporter mRNA, we found that eRF3a silencing induced an important increase in readthrough whereas eRF3b silencing had no significant effect. We also found that eRF3a depletion reduced the intracellular level of eRF1 protein by affecting its stability. In addition, we showed that eRF3b overexpression alleviated the effect of eRF3a silencing on readthrough and on eRF1 cellular levels. These results suggest that eRF3a is the major factor acting in translation termination in mammals and clearly demonstrate that eRF3b can substitute for eRF3a in this function. Finally, our data indicate that the expression level of eRF3a controls the formation of the termination complex by modulating eRF1 protein stability.     

Kinetic analysis of interaction of eukaryotic release factor 3 with guanine nucleotides

Eukaryotic translation termination is mediated by two release factors: eRF1 recognizes stop codons and triggers peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis, whereas eRF3 accelerates this process in a GTP-dependent manner. Here we report kinetic analysis of guanine nucleotide binding to eRF3 performed by fluorescence stopped-flow technique using GTP/GDP derivatives carrying the fluorescent methylanthraniloyl (mant-) group, as well as thermodynamic analysis of eRF3 binding to unlabeled guanine nucleotides. Whereas the kinetics of eRF3 binding to mant-GDP is consistent with a one-step binding model, the double-exponential transients of eRF3 binding to mant-GTP indicate a two-step binding mechanism, in which the initial eRF3.mant-GTP complex undergoes subsequent conformational change. The affinity of eRF3 for GTP (K(d), approximately 70 microM) is about 70-fold lower than for GDP (K(d), approximately 1 microM) and both nucleotides dissociate rapidly from eRF3 (k(-1)(mant-GDP) approximately 2.4 s(-1); k(-2)(mant-GTP) approximately 3.3 s(-1)). Whereas not influencing eRF3 binding to GDP, association of eRF3 with eRF1 at physiological Mg(2+) concentrations specifically changes the kinetics of eRF3/mant-GTP interaction and stabilizes eRF3.GTP binding by two orders of magnitude (K(d) approximately 0.7 microM) due to lowering of the dissociation rate constant approximately 24-fold (k(-1)(mant-GTP) approximately 0.14s(-1) approximately 0.14 s(-1)). Thus, eRF1 acts as a GTP dissociation inhibitor (TDI) for eRF3, promoting efficient ribosomal recruitment of its GTP-bound form. 80 S ribosomes did not influence guanine nucleotide binding/exchange on the eRF1 x eRF3 complex. Guanine nucleotide binding and exchange on eRF3, which therefore depends on stimulation by eRF1, is entirely different from that on prokaryotic RF3 and unusual among GTPases.     

Eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) abolishes readthrough and competes with suppressor tRNAs at all three termination codons in messenger RNA.

It is known from experiments with bacteria and eukaryotic viruses that readthrough of termination codons located within the open reading frame (ORF) of mRNAs depends on the availability of suppressor tRNA(s) and the efficiency of termination in cells. Consequently, the yield of readthrough products can be used as a measure of the activity of polypeptide chain release factor(s) (RF), key components of the translation termination machinery. Readthrough of the UAG codon located at the end of the ORF encoding the coat protein of beet necrotic yellow vein furovirus is required for virus replication. Constructs harbouring this suppressible UAG codon and derivatives containing a UGA or UAA codon in place of the UAG codon have been used in translation experiments in vitro in the absence or presence of human suppressor tRNAs. Readthrough can be virtually abolished by addition of bacterially-expressed eukaryotic RF1 (eRF1). Thus, eRF1 is functional towards all three termination codons located in a natural mRNA and efficiently competes in vitro with endogenous and exogenous suppressor tRNA(s) at the ribosomal A site. These results are consistent with a crucial role of eRF1 in translation termination and forms the essence of an in vitro assay for RF activity based on the abolishment of readthrough by eRF1.