Effects of intracerebroventricular infusion of genistein on the secretory activity of the GnRH/LH axis in ovariectomized ewes

Phytoestrogens, plant derived estrogen like-compounds exert numerous effects on the reproductive functions of animals. The present study was designed to demonstrate if exogenous genistein infused during the breeding season into the third ventricle of the brain of ovariectomized ewes could affect the secretory activity of the GnRH/LH axis. Two-year-old ovariectomized ewes (n=8) were infused with vehicle (control, n=3) or genistein (10 microg/100 microl/h, n=5) into the third ventricle. The infusions were done from 10.00 to 14.00 h and blood samples collection was performed this day up to 20.00 h and next day from 8.00 to 10.00 h. The animals were slaughtered, thereafter. Immunoreactive (IR) GnRH neurons in the hypothalamus and LH cells in the adenohypophysis were localized by immunohistochemistry. Messenger RNA analyses were performed by nonisotope in situ hybridization using sense and anti-sense riboprobes produced from beta subunits of LH cDNA clones. Plasma LH concentrations were measured by radioimmunoassay. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that genistein infusion affected the morphology of GnRH neurons evoking a visualization of long axons in the GnRH perikarya and visibly diminished IR GnRH stores in the median eminence. The number of IR LH cells and IR material stored in the adenohypophyses increased in genistein-infused animals, which was confirmed by statistical analysis (P<0.001). The in situ hybridization analyses showed in these ewes the increase of mRNA LHbeta hybridization signal. The changes in LH release in response to genistein infusion had a biphasic character: it decreased within 6 h after infusion and increased 24 h later. Mean concentration of LH and amplitude of pulses measured from the beginning of infusion up to end of the experiment were significantly higher (P<0.05) in genistein-infused ewes compared to vehicle-treatment. In conclusion, our data show that genistein, a phytoestrogen, may effectively modulate GnRH and LH secretion in OVX ewes by acting directly on the CNS. The biphasic character of the LH response is similar to that of estradiol during the breeding season in the ewes.     

Role of estradiol in inducing an ovulatory-like surge of luteinizing hormone in sheep

Two experiments were performed to examine the effect of estradiol on secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) and on the number of receptors for gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) after down regulation of GnRH receptors in ovariectomized ewes. In the first experiment, ovariectomized ewes were administered one of four treatments: Group 1) infusion of GnRH i.v. for 40 h; Group 2) injection of 100 micrograms estradiol i.m.; Group 3) infusion of GnRH i.v. for 16 h followed immediately by an injection of 100 micrograms estradiol i.m.; and Group 4) infusion of GnRH i.v. for 40 h plus injection of 100 micrograms estradiol i.m. after the 16th h of infusion. Ewes in Groups 1, 3 and 4 responded to the infusion of GnRH with an immediate increase in serum concentrations of LH, with maximum values occurring between 2 and 4 h after the start of infusion; serum concentrations of LH then began to decline and were approaching the pretreatment baseline within 16 h. Administration of estradiol resulted in a surge of LH regardless of whether the pituitary had been desensitized by infusion of GnRH or not. In all cases the magnitude of the surge was similar to that induced by the initial infusion of GnRH. In Groups 2 and 3 the surge of LH began at 12.3 +/- 0.1 and 11.9 +/- 0.1 h after administration of estradiol. In contrast, the ewes in Group 4 had a surge of LH beginning 3.7 +/- 0.1 h after administration of estradiol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Inter-breed variation in the postpartum ewe response to continuous low dose infusion of GnRH

During the nonbreeding season the pituitary and ovarian responses to a subcutaneous GnRH infusion were investigated in acyclic, lactating Mule ewes which exhibit a deep seasonal anestrus and in Finn x Dorset ewes in which seasonal anestrus is ill-defined. Each breed received 10 d of progestagen priming before being subdivided into 3 groups. In Group L + G, 5 lactating ewes received GnRH (250 ng/h sc) for 96 h; in Group D + G, 5 dry ewes received GnRH (250 ng/h sc) for 96 h; in Group L, 5 lactating ewes received saline vehicle for 96 h. The infusions began when lactating and dry ewes were approximately 28 d and 120 d post partum, respectively. Blood samples were collected for LH, progesterone and estradiol analysis. Estrous behavior was monitored between Day -4 and Day +7. On Day +7 the reproductive tract was also examined. In the Mule ewes the mean plasma LH concentration increased (P < 0.05) following minipump insertion in each treatment group, although mean LH levels were greater (P < 0.05) in Group D + G, than in either Group L + G or Group L. Following the GnRH infusion, mean plasma estradiol levels increased (P < 0.05) in Group D + G but not in Group L + G. A preovulatory LH surge and subsequent ovulation occurred in 5 5 , 2 5 and 0 5 ewes from Group D + G, L + G and L, respectively, and estrus was recorded in 5 5 , 1 5 and 0 5 of these ewes, respectively. The LH surges began earlier (P < 0.05) (43.2 +/- 6.8 h vs 77.0 +/- 1.0 h) and the ovulation rate was greater (2.2 +/- 0.37 vs 1.00 +/- 0.00) in Group D + G than Group L + G. In the Finn x Dorset ewes mean LH concentrations increased (P < 0.05), to a similar level following minipump insertion in Groups D + G and L + G, but not Group L. The elevated LH levels were accompanied by increased (P < 0.05) plasma estradiol levels in Group D + G, but not in Group L + G. The GnRH infusion culminated in an LH surge and estrous behavior in 5 5 , 1 5 and 0 5 ewes from Groups D + G, L + D and L, respectively. The interval to the LH surge was similar between Group D + G (48.4 +/- 6.6 h) and Group L + G (46.0 h). Ovulation was evident in those ewes which exhibited an LH surge plus one additional ewe from Group L + G. The mean ovulation rate was greater in Group D + G (4.00 +/- 1.05) than in Group L + G (1.5 +/- 0.50). These data show that continuous GnRH infusion can consistently induce out of season breeding in the nonlactating Mule and Finn x Dorset ewe but can not break combined seasonal and lactational anestrous in these breeds. Further, between-breed differences are evident in the site along the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis at which reproduction is compromised in ewes at the same chronological stage post partum.     

Induction of ovulation in the acyclic postpartum ewe following continuous, low-dose subcutaneous infusion of GnRH

Pituitary and ovarian responses to subcutaneous infusion of GnRH were investigated in acyclic, lactating Mule ewes during the breeding season. Thirty postpartum ewes were split into 3 equal groups; Group G received GnRH (250 ng/h) for 96 h; Group P + G was primed with progestagen for 10 d then received GnRH (250 ng/h) for 96 h; and Group P received progestagen priming and saline vehicle only. The infusions were delivered via osmotic minipumps inserted 26.6 +/- 0.45 d post partum (Day 0 of the study). Blood samples were collected for LH analysis every 15 min from 12 h before until 8 h after minipump insertion, then every 2 h for a further 112 h. Daily blood samples were collected for progesterone analysis on Days 1 to 10 following minipump insertion, then every third day for a further 25 d. In addition, the reproductive tract was examined by laparoscopy on Day -5 and Day +7 and estrous behavior was monitored between Day -4 and Day +7. Progestagen priming suppressed (P < 0.05) plasma LH levels (0.27 +/- 0.03 vs 0.46 +/- 0.06 ng/ml) during the preinfusion period, but the GnRH-induced LH release was similar for Group G and Group P + G. The LH surge began significantly (P < 0.05) earlier (32.0 +/- 3.0 vs 56.3 +/- 4.1 h) and was of greater magnitude (32.15 +/- 3.56 vs 18.84 +/- 4.13 ng/ml) in the unprimed than the primed ewes. None of the ewes infused with saline produced a preovulatory LH surge. The GnRH infusion induced ovulation in 10/10 unprimed and 7/9 progestagen-primed ewes, with no significant difference in ovulation rate (1.78 +/- 0.15 and 1.33 +/- 0.21, respectively). Ovulation was followed by normal luteal function in 4/10 Group-G ewes, while the remaining 6 ewes had short luteal phases. In contrast, each of the 7 Group-P + G ewes that ovulated secreted progesterone for at least 10 d, although elevated plasma progesterone levels were maintained in 3/7 unmated ewes for >35 d. Throughout the study only 2 ewes (both from Group P + G) displayed estrus. These data demonstrate that although a low dose, continuous infusion of GnRH can increase tonic LH concentrations sufficient to promote a preovulatory LH surge and induce ovulation, behavioral estrus and normal luteal function do not consistently follow ovulation in the progestagen-primed, postpartum ewe.     

Treatment of seasonally anestrous Romney ewes with continuous infusion of low doses of GnRH: effects on estrus, ovulation and plasma progesterone concentration

The aim of this study was to assess the suitability of a GnRH infusion regimen (125 ng/h or 250 ng/h) to induce estrous behaviour, ovulation and normal corpus luteum function in progesterone-primed Romney ewes each month of seasonal anestrus (i.e. September to February inclusive) over two years. None of the progesterone-primed control ewes (i.e. no GnRH treatment; N = 120 observations) ovulated, showed normal corpus luteum function or displayed estrous behaviour at any time during anestrus. Approximately 27 and 50% of the respective 125 ng/h and 250 ng/h GnRH-treated ewes (N = 120 observations per GnRH treatment) ovulated and showed normal luteal function. Of those which ovulated 59.2% and 52.4% in the respective 125 ng/h and 250 ng/h GnRH treatment groups showed estrous behaviour. There was a significant effect of GnRH dose on the median number of ovulations (250 ng/h > 125 ng/h; P<0.01) but no overall difference (when both treatment years and GnRH doses were pooled) in the median number of ovulations per month of anestrus. The frequency of ewes with an ovulation rate >2 was low with only 4/95 treated ewes with more than 2 corpora lutea (CL). Treatment of progesterone-primed ewes with 250 ng/h GnRH increased plasma LH (P<0.01) but not FSH concentrations; a significant increase in LH pulse amplitude (P<0.05) but not LH pulse frequency was observed. The plasma gonadotropin levels in the 125 ng/h GnRH treatment groups were not studied. We suggest that in breeds such as the Romney which have a strict (i.e. 5-6 month) anovulatory interval, the GnRH-infusion technique may be of limited practical use for inducing pregnancies during the non-breeding season.     

Pituitary receptors for gonadotropin-releasing hormone in relation to changes in pituitary and plasma luteinizing hormone in ovariectomized-hypothalamo pituitary disconnected ewes. I. Effect of changing frequency of gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulses

Studies were undertaken to determine if changes in the amplitude of luteinizing hormone (LH) pulses that occur in response to changes in the frequency of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) pulses are due to an alteration in the number of GnRH receptors. Ewes were ovariectomized (OVX) and the hypothalamus was disconnected from the pituitary (HPD). Ewes were then given pulses of GnRH at a frequency of 1/h or 1/3 h. Two control groups were included: OVX ewes not subjected to HPD, and HPD ewes that were not OVX. At the end of one week of treatment, blood samples were collected to determine the amplitude of LH pulses. The treated ewes were killed just before the next scheduled pulse of GnRH, and the content of LH and number of GnRH receptors were measured in each pituitary. The amplitude of LH pulses was highly correlated with the amount of LH in the pituitary gland (r = 0.71, p less than 0.01), and both LH content and pulse amplitude (mean + SEM) were higher in ewes receiving GnRH once per 3 h (189.7 +/- 39.3 microgram/pituitary, 10.3 +/- 1.1 ng/ml, respectively) than in ewes receiving GnRH once per h (77.8 +/- 11.4 microgram/pituitary, 5.2 +/- 1.3 ng/ml). The pituitary content of LH was highest in the OVX ewes (260.2 +/- 57.4 micrograms/pituitary) and lowest in the nonpulsed HPD ewes (61.7 +/- 51.2 micrograms/pituitary). The number of GnRH receptors was similar in all groups, and was not correlated with any other variable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

LH response to GnRH infusion in postpartum, fall-lambing ewes subjected to prepartum energy restrictions

Fall-lambing western range ewes were fed either a high-or low-energy ration the last two months of gestation and were fed protein and energy in excess postpartum. GnRH was infused for 10 hours on day 5 or 26 postpartum. Blood samples were collected at 20-minute intervals during infusion and radioimmunoassayed for LH. Net weight change from day 60 prepartum to day 1 postpartum was 0.67 +/- 1 kg vs. -6.9 +/- 1.5 kg (mean +/- SE) for the high-and low-energy groups, respectively (P < 0.05). Nutritional treatment had no effect on LH response at either day 5 or day 26 postpartum, althoughthe day 26 LH response to GnRH was greater (P < 0.05) than the day 5 LH response. LH response was greater (P < 0.05) in ewes that gained weight prepartum vs. ewes that lost weight prepartum, but only in ewes infused on day 5 postpartum.     

Naloxone evokes large-amplitude GnRH pulses in luteal-phase ewes

Ewes were sampled during the mid-late luteal phase of the oestrous cycle. Hypophysial portal and jugular venous blood samples were collected at 5-10 min intervals for a minimum of 3 h, before i.v. infusions of saline (12 ml/h; N = 6) or naloxone (40 mg/h; N = 6) for 2 h. During the 2-h saline infusion 2/6 sheep exhibited a GnRH/LH pulse; 3/6 saline infused ewes did not show a pulse during the 6-8-h portal blood sampling period. In contrast, large amplitude GnRH/LH pulses were observed during naloxone treatment in 5/6 ewes. The mean (+/- s.e.m.) amplitude of the LH secretory episodes during the naloxone infusion (1.07 +/- 0.11 ng/ml) was significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than that before the infusion in the same sheep (0.54 +/- 0.15 ng/ml). Naloxone significantly (P less than 0.005) increased the mean GnRH pulse amplitude in the 5/6 responding ewes from a pre-infusion value of 0.99 +/- 0.22 pg/min to 4.39 +/- 1.10 pg/min during infusion. This episodic GnRH secretory rate during naloxone treatment was also significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than in the saline-infused sheep (1.53 +/- 0.28 pg/min). Plasma FSH and prolactin concentrations did not change in response to the opiate antagonist. Perturbation of the endogenous opioid peptide system in the ewe by naloxone therefore increases the secretion of hypothalamic GnRH into the hypophysial portal vasculature. The response is characterized by a large-amplitude GnRH pulse which, in turn, causes a large-amplitude pulse of LH to be released by the pituitary gland.     

Progesterone directly inhibits pituitary luteinizing hormone secretion in an estradiol-dependent manner.

We recently demonstrated that progesterone and estradiol inhibit pituitary LH secretion in a synergistic fashion. This study examines the direct feedback of progesterone on the estradiol-primed pituitary. Nine ovariectomized (OVX) ewes underwent hypothalamic-pituitary disconnection (HPD) and were infused with 400 ng GnRH every 2 h throughout the experiment. After 7 days of infusion, estradiol was implanted s.c. Four days later, estradiol implants were exchanged for blank implants in 4 ewes and for progesterone implants in 5 ewes. These implants remained in place for another 4 days. Blood samples were collected around exogenous GnRH pulses before and 0.5 to 96 h after implant insertion and exchange. Serum LH and progesterone concentrations were determined through RIA. One month later, 4 of the HPD-OVX ewes previously implanted with steroids were reinfused with GnRH and the implantation protocol was repeated using blank implants only. In estradiol-primed ewes, progesterone significantly lowered LH secretion after 12 h of implantation and LH secretion remained inhibited while progesterone implants were in place (p less than 0.05). Removing estradiol transiently lowered LH secretion, and this effect was significant only 24 h after estradiol withdrawal (p less than 0.05). These data suggest that progesterone has a direct, estradiol-dependent inhibitory effect on pituitary LH release and that estradiol may sustain pituitary gonadotrope response to GnRH.     

GnRH-induced gonadotrophin secretion in ovariectomized Booroola ewes with hypothalamic-pituitary disconnection

To test whether the F gene-specific differences in the plasma concentrations of FSH and LH are due to differences in the pituitary responsiveness to exogenous GnRH, ovariectomized Booroola ewes with hypothalamic-pituitary disconnection (HPD-ovx) were treated with GnRH (250 ng i.v.) once every 2 h for up to 5 weeks. In Exp. 1, jugular venous blood was collected once weekly from 13 FF and 14 ++ HPD-ovx ewes for 6 weeks before GnRH treatment and every 2nd, 3rd or 6th day for 5 weeks during treatment. In Exp. 2, jugular venous blood was collected from another 8 FF and 7 ++ HPD-ovx ewes at 5- or 10-min intervals over 4 GnRH pulses (250 ng i.v. once every 2 h) on 3 separate occasions after the animals had been subjected to the GnRH pulse regimen for approximately 7 days beforehand. Also in Exp. 2, the animals were extensively sampled around a larger (10 micrograms) i.v. injection of GnRH and the pituitary FSH and LH contents assessed after the animals had been re-exposed to the once every 2 h GnRH (250 ng i.v.) pulse regimen for several days following the larger GnRH bolus. In Exp. 3 the distributions of mean plasma concentrations of FSH and LH in individual GnRH-treated HPD-ovx ewes were compared with those in ovariectomized and ovary-intact FF and ++ ewes. During the 6 weeks before GnRH treatment (Exp. 1), the plasma concentrations of FSH (approximately 1 ng/ml) and LH (less than or equal to 0.8 ng/ml) were not different between the genotypes. After GnRH treatment both the mean FSH and LH concentrations increased significantly (P less than 0.01) above basal values after 2 days with F gene-specific differences being noted for FSH but not LH (FSH; FF greater than ++; P less than 0.05). Thereafter, the mean FSH but not LH concentrations increased at a faster rate in FF than in ++ ewes with the overall mean FSH concentrations between the genotypes being significantly different (P less than 0.05). In Exp. 2 considerable between-animal variation in the pulsatile pattern of FSH but not LH concentrations was seen in ewes of both genotypes during GnRH treatment. The overall mean FSH concentrations were higher in FF than in ++ ewes (P less than 0.05) and the mean FSH response to each GnRH pulse was significantly higher in FF than in ++ ewes (P less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Early pituitary LH response to injections of GnRH in ewes

In the deep anoestrous period (June), five intact ewes and five ovariectomized ewes received 50 ug synthetic gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH). In the mid-breeding season (October), the GnRH administrations were repeated in five intact and four ovariectomized ewes; the former were in the luteal phase of the cycle. Blood samples were collected every 30 sec for 15 min, then at 15-min intervals. Release of luteinizing hormone (LH) occurred as soon as the second minute after injection in all ewes. This early response was earlier and more abrupt in the ovariectomized ewes than in the intact animals. In a second experiment three intact ewes that were in deep anoestrus received 50 ug GnRH followed 5 h 20 min later by a second identical injection. Another three intact ewes in deep anoestrus received two injections of 1 ug GnRH. Blood samples were taken every 15 sec for 15 min, then every 20 min until the next injection, and for a further 5 h after the second injection. This regimen was repeated in mid-breeding season during the luteal phase. There was again a very early release of LH; the magnitude of response was similar after the first injection of either 50 ug or 1 ug GnRH to intact ewes either in the breeding season or during deep anoestrus. However, a greater early release of LH was obtained at the lower dose only after the second injection of GnRH. Apart from this exception, the similar early release of LH occurred in spite of different amounts of LH released thereafter in response to the two doses of GnRH. It is suggested that the early response to GnRH consists of LH stored in a "readily releasable" pool in the pituitary, whereas the main release of LH may be a result of increased synthesis and/or release of a more stable pool.     

Differential regulation of gonadotropin subunit messenger ribonucleic acids by gonadotropin-releasing hormone pulse frequency in ewes

Changes in the frequency of GnRH and LH pulses have been shown to occur between the luteal and preovulatory periods in the ovine estrous cycle. We examined the effect of these different frequencies of GnRH pulses on pituitary concentrations of LH and FSH subunit mRNAs. Eighteen ovariectomized ewes were implanted with progesterone to eliminate endogenous GnRH release during the nonbreeding season. These animals then received 3 ng/kg body weight GnRH in frequencies of once every 4, 1, or 0.5 h for 4 days. These frequencies represent those observed during the luteal and follicular phases, and the preovulatory LH and FSH surge of the ovine estrous cycle, respectively. On day 4, the ewes were killed and their anterior pituitary glands were removed for measurements of pituitary LH, FSH, and their subunit mRNAs. Pituitary content of LH and FSH, as assessed by RIA, did not change (P greater than 0.10) in response to the three different GnRH pulse frequencies. However, subunit mRNA concentrations, assessed by solution hybridization assays and expressed as femtomoles per mg total RNA, did change as a result of different GnRH frequencies. alpha mRNA concentrations were higher (P less than 0.05) when the GnRH pulse frequency was 1/0.5 h and 1 h, whereas LH beta and FSH beta mRNA concentrations were maximal (P less than 0.05) only at a pulse frequency of 1/h. Additionally, pituitary LH and FSH secretory response to GnRH on day 4 was maximal (P = 0.05) when the pulse infusion was 1/h.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Does prolactin influence the hypothalamo-pituitary GnRH-LH system in preovulatory-phase ewes?

The effects of prolonged infusions of prolactin (PRL) into the third ventricle of the brain of cycling ewes on the secretory activity of hypothalamic GnRH neurons and pituitary LH cells in the pars distalis during the proestrous day were studied. Mature Blackhead ewes were infused with vehicle (control, n=5) or with prolactin (200 mug/day, n=5) during 4 consecutive days prior to the next spontaneous ovulation. The dose of PRL was infused each day in 4 series of 50 mug/100 mul/h at 30-min. intervals, from 8.30 to 14.00 h. The animals were slaughtered on the 16th (proestrous) day of the estrous cycle immediately after the last infusion and their brains were fixed in situ. Plasma samples were collected for 6 h at 10 min. intervals, on days 12 (before the infusions) and 16 of the cycle. The distribution pattern, number and morphology of GnRH neurons in vehicle- and PRL-infused ewes were found to be similar and typical for the proestrous phase of the cycle. The immunoreactive (ir) GnRH stores in the median eminence were high and similar in both groups. There were no differences between control and PRL-treated ewes in the number or features of irLH cells. The area fraction and optical density for irLH cells and mRNA LHbeta-expressing cells did not differ between control and experimental groups. Irrespective of the kind of infusion, changes in LH secretion during the estrous cycle were similar in control and PRL-infused ewes. Mean plasma LH concentrations were higher (p<0.001) on day 16 compared to day 12 of the cycle. There were no differences in plasma LH concentrations or in the parameters of pulsatile LH secretion between groups. In conclusion, repeated, several-hour-long infusions of PRL into the CNS prior to the next spontaneous ovulation in ewes has no direct effect on the secretory activity of GnRH neurons, and/or the synthesis, accumulation, or tonic release of LH from the pituitary gonadotrophs.     

Effects of ageing and exogenous melatonin on pituitary responsiveness to GnRH in ewes during anestrus and the reproductive season

The study examined the effect of melatonin implants on in vivo pituitary responsiveness to GnRH in control, fully productive (5.7+/-0.4 years old, n=17) and aged (10.7+/-0.3 years old, n=14) ovariectomized, estradiol-treated Rasa Aragonesa ewes. On 27 February, eight ewes in each age group received a single implant containing 18 mg melatonin. On 10 April, blood samples to be assayed for LH were collected at 10-min intervals over 4h (starting at 09:00 and 22:00 h). After samples 6 and 18 were collected, ewes received a single i.v. injection of GnRH (20 ng/kg liveweight). The pituitary response to GnRH was assessed using the difference between plasma LH concentrations before and after (highest value) each injection (DLH1, DLH2)), and the area under the LH response curve for 1h after each GnRH injection (AUC1, AUC2). On 23 September, the previously implanted ewes received a new melatonin implant and, on 17 November, all of the ewes were subjected to the same diurnal and nocturnal sampling protocols, again. Generally, non-implanted aged ewes exhibited a lower pituitary response to GnRH than did non-implanted control ewes, particularly in November and after the first injection (P<0.05 for DLH1 and AUC1 in both the diurnal and nocturnal tests). The response was significantly affected by the interaction of age and melatonin treatment, particularly in the diurnal tests (P<0.1 for DLH1 and AUC1, and P<0.05 for AUC2 in April; P<0.05 for DLH1, AUC1 and AUC2 in November), which indicated that exogenous melatonin increased LH levels after GnRH injections in aged ewes compared to non-implanted ewes, this effect being the opposite in control females. Thus, melatonin can restore in ewes the functionality of the neuroendocrine system, after it has been reduced by senescence.     

Effect of number of receptors for gonadotropin-releasing hormone on the release of luteinizing hormone

The relationship between number of receptors for gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and the ability of the anterior pituitary gland to release luteinizing hormone (LH) was examined in ovariectomized ewes. A GnRH antagonist was used to regulate the number of available receptors. The dose of GnRH antagonist required to saturate approximately 50 and 90% of GnRH receptors in ovariectomized ewes was determined. Thirty min after intracarotid infusion of GnRH antagonist, ewes were killed and the number of unsaturated (i.e., those available for binding) pituitary GnRH receptors was quantified. Infusion of 10 and 150 micrograms GnRH antagonist over a 5-min period reduced binding of the labeled ligand to approximately 50 and 12% of controls, respectively. The effect of reducing the number of GnRH receptors on release of LH after varying doses of the GnRH agonist, D-Ala6-GnRH-Pro9-ethylamide (D-Ala6-GnRH) was then evaluated. One of four doses of D-Ala6-GnRH (0.125, 2.5, 50 and 400 micrograms) was given i.v. to 48 ovariectomized ewes whose GnRH receptors had not been changed or were reduced to approximately 50 or 12% of control ewes. In ewes with a 50% reduction in GnRH receptors, total release of LH (area under response curve) was lower than that obtained for controls (P less than 0.01) at the 0.125-micrograms dose of D-Ala (6.1 +/- 0.7 cm2 vs. 13.5 +/- 0.7 cm2) but was not different at the 2.5-, 50- or 400-micrograms doses of D-Ala6-GnRH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Early pituitary follicle stimulating hormone response to gonadotrophin releasing hormone in ewes

The object of our experiments was to characterize the response of plasma follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) within minutes of an i.v. injection of high or low doses of gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH), especially in relation to contemporary changes in luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations. In the deep anoestrous period (June), three intact ewes and two ovariectomized ewes were injected with 1 mug synthetic GnRH followed 2 h later by a second identical injection. A week later, the same regimen was repeated with the same sheep but with 50 mug GnRH after an interval of 5 h 20 min. Blood samples were collected every 15 sec for 15 min after each injection (early release), then at longer intervals (main release) till the next treatment, followed by sampling for a further 6-h period after the second treatment. FSH was released as soon as the second minute after GnRH injection in all ewes. The mean pituitary FSH response, during this early release, in intact and ovariectomized ewes was similar after either 1 or 50 mug GnRH. However, the main release was less pronounced in the ovariectomized sheep and was not stimulated after the second treatment in all sheep. Three other ewes were injected with 40 mug GnRH and sampled every 15 sec for seven, 6-min periods during the period of release to compare FSH and LH secretion. The profiles reflected a similarity in sensitivity and responsiveness to GnRH, especially soon after GnRH injection. Increases in both hormones were formed by several grouped associated spikes. It is suggested that a readily releasable pool of FSH exists in the ewe. There are probably differences in the mechanisms of synthesis and/or release between pituitary FSH and LH.     

Effect of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH1-24) on ovine pituitary gland responsiveness to exogenous pulsatile GnRH and oestradiol-induced LH release in vivo.

The present experiment was designed to determine if and how exogenous ACTH replicates the effects of stressors to delay the preovulatory LH surge in sheep. Twenty-four hours after oestrous synchronisation with prostaglandin in the breeding season, groups of 8-9 intact ewes were injected with 50 microg oestradiol benzoate (0 h) followed 8 h later by 3 injections of saline or GnRH (500 ng each, i.v.) at 2 h intervals (controls). Two further groups received an additional 'late' injection of ACTH (0.8 mg i.m.) 7.5 h after oestradiol, i.e., 0.5 h before the first saline or GnRH challenge. To examine if the duration of prior exposure to ACTH was important, another group of ewes was given ACTH 'early', i.e. 2.5 h before the first GnRH injection. The first GnRH injection produced a maximum LH response of 1.9+/-0.4 ng/ml which was significantly (p < 0.01) enhanced after the second and third GnRH challenge (7.1+/-1.5 ng/ml and 7.0+/-1.7 ng/ml, respectively; 'self-priming'). Late ACTH did not affect the LH response after the first GnRH challenge (1.9+/-0.4 vs. 1.8+/-0.3 ng/ml; p > 0.05) but decreased maximum LH concentrations after the second GnRH to 35% (7.1+/-1.5 vs. 4.6+/-1.1 ng/ml; p = 0.07) and to 40% after the third GnRH (7.0+/-1.7 vs. 4.0+/-0.8 ng/ml; p = 0.05). When ACTH was given early, 4.5 h before the second GnRH, there was no effect on this LH response suggesting that the effect decreases with time after ACTH administration. Concerning the oestradiol-induced LH surge, exogenous GnRH alone delayed the onset time (20.5+/-2.0 vs. 27.8+/-2.1 h; p > 0.05) and reduced the duration of the surge (8.5+/-0.9 vs. 6.7+/-0.6 h; p > 0.05). The onset of the LH surge was observed within 40 h after oestradiol on 29 out of 34 occasions in the saline +/- GnRH treated ewes compared to 11 out of 34 occasions (p < 0.05) when ACTH was also given, either late or early. In those ewes that did not have an LH surge by the end of sampling, plasma progesterone concentrations during the following oestrous cycle increased 2 days later suggesting a delay, not a complete blockade of the LH surge. In conclusion, we have revealed for the first time that ACTH reduces the GnRH self-priming effect in vivo and delays the LH surge, at least partially by direct effects at the pituitary gland.     

No evidence for pituitary priming to gonadotropin-releasing hormone in relation to luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion prior to the preovulatory LH surge in ewes

The purpose of this study was to determine the occurrence of and the regulatory mechanisms involved in priming of the pituitary to GnRH before the preovulatory LH surge in sheep. Experiment 1: Forty-two ewes had progestagen devices removed after 14 days and were assigned to luteal (Lut) or follicular (Foll) groups. Fifteen days later, blood sampling was initiated either immediately or 36 h after induced luteolysis in groups Lut and Foll, respectively. After 4 h, ewes were administered either saline (n = 5) or 250 ng (n = 8) or 10 microg (n = 8) of GnRH. Five ewes per treatment group were killed 1 h later, while remaining animals were blood sampled for a further 7 h. Experiment 2: Eighteen ewes were allocated to Lut and Foll groups (described above). Blood samples were collected from 2 h before GnRH (10 microg) treatment until 7 h after. Despite up-regulated GnRH-R mRNA levels in Foll ewes, pituitary content and plasma levels of LH and LHbeta mRNA levels were similar between groups. Mean FSHbeta mRNA and plasma FSH levels were elevated in Lut ewes but declined after GnRH treatment. Inversely, plasma estradiol and inhibin-A concentrations were higher in Foll ewes and declined after GnRH treatment. Fewer LH(+ve)/secretogranin II(-ve) (SgII(-ve)) granules were present in gonadotropes of Foll ewes, coincident with increased basal LH levels. Fewer smaller sized granules were present after GnRH treatment. In conclusion, there was no evidence of self-priming before onset of the preovulatory LH surge. Constitutive release of LH(+ve)/SgII(-ve) granules may maintain basal LH levels while smaller sized, presumably mature granules may be preferentially released after GnRH stimulation.     

Effect of stress-like concentrations of cortisol on follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH in sheep

Stress-like concentrations of cortisol increase the negative feedback potency of oestradiol in castrated male sheep. A similar cortisol-dependent response in female sheep might be expected to suppress gonadotrophin secretion and impair follicular development and ovulation. The oestrous activity of 21 female sheep was synchronized using progestogen-treated vaginal pessaries to test this hypothesis. Stress-like concentrations of cortisol (60-70 ng ml-1) were established by continuous infusion of cortisol (80 micrograms kg-1 h-1; n = 13) beginning 5 days before, and continuing for 5 days after, pessary removal. Control animals (n = 8) received a comparable volume of vehicle (50% ethanol-saline) over the 10 day infusion period. Serum concentrations of oestradiol increased progressively in control sheep during the 48 h immediately after pessary removal. This increase in serum oestradiol was blocked or significantly attenuated in sheep receiving stress-like concentrations of cortisol. Preovulatory surge-like secretion of LH was apparent in control animals 58.5 +/- 2.1 h after pessary removal. In contrast, surge-like secretion of LH was not observed during the 5 days after pessary removal in 54% (7 of 13) of sheep receiving cortisol. Moreover, the onset of the surge was significantly delayed in the cortisol-treated ewes that showed surge-like secretion of LH during the infusion period. The ability of episodic pulses of exogenous GnRH to override the anti-gonadal effect of cortisol was examined in a second study. Oestrous activity of 12 ewes was synchronized using progestogen-containing pessaries as described above. Ewes were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (n = 4 ewes per group). Animals received cortisol (100 micrograms kg-1 h-1; groups 1 and 2) or a comparable volume of vehicle (group 3) beginning 5 days before, and continuing for 2 days after, pessary removal. Pulses of GnRH (4 ng kg-1 h-1, i.v.; group 1) or saline (groups 2 and 3) at 1 h intervals were initiated at pessary removal and continued for 48 h. Serum concentrations of oestradiol were not significantly increased after pessary removal in sheep receiving cortisol alone. Conversely, serum concentrations of oestradiol increased progressively during the 48 h after pessary removal in control ewes and in ewes receiving cortisol and GnRH. At the end of infusion, serum concentrations of oestradiol did not differ (P > 0.05) between control (7.7 +/- 0.8 pg ml-1) ewes and ewes receiving cortisol and episodic GnRH (6.4 +/- 1.3 pg ml-1). Moreover, these values were significantly greater (P < 0.05) than the serum concentrations of oestradiol in animals receiving cortisol (1.0 +/- 0.4 pg ml-1) alone. Collectively, these data indicate stress-like concentrations of cortisol block or delay follicular development and the preovulatory surge of LH in sheep. In addition, episodic GnRH overrides cortisol-induced delay in follicular maturation.     

Time series analysis of plasma LH and FSH concentrations as a method of assessing episodic secretion

Time series analysis was used to detect LH and FSH episodes in untreated seasonally anoestrous ewes and prepubertal heifers, and in these animals when treated with low doses of GnRH. For comparison, these profiles were also assessed for episodic secretion by subjective, visual appraisal methods and by cycle detection-an objective threshold method. In untreated animals, time series analysis detected recurring events in the LH and FSH profiles, the period lengths of which varied between individual animals. When GnRH was injected at 2-h intervals, cycles in LH secretion with period lengths of 120 min were recorded in all animals, of 60 min in all ewes and 11/12 heifers, and of 40.5 min in 22/24 ewes and 10/12 heifers. The cycles with period lengths of 60 and 40.5 min are probably artefacts of this method of analysis. No consistent cycles in FSH release were detected in GnRH-injected anoestrous ewes, but 120-min cycles were recorded in 8/12 GnRH-injected heifers. When GnRH was administered to seasonally anoestrous ewes by continuous infusion, recurring cycles in both LH and FSH secretion were evident. However, there was no consistency in their period lengths and the mean number and frequency of cycles were similar to pretreatment values. The number of episodes detected by visual appraisal was influenced by the choice of episode definition. Both methods identified LH, but not FSH, episodes in response to each injection in all GnRH-injected animals. Cycle detection, which does not identify individual episodes, recorded LH and FSH episode frequencies similar to those detected by the more stringent method of visual appraisal. Time series analysis detected an FSH response to GnRH injections in prepubertal heifers that was not identified by the other methods of analysis. However, because of the asymmetric nature of LH episodes, it also detected cycles in LH profiles that were probably spurious. Subjective decisions influenced the frequencies of LH and FSH episodes recorded by visual appraisal, and the variation in episode amplitude in these profiles made cycle detection inappropriate. Each of these methods can contribute to the interpretation of hormone profiles, but their constraints and limitations must be recognized.