The effects of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) on the release of anterior pituitary hormones

Several members of the secretin family of hormones have been demonstrated to alter anterior pituitary hormone secretion. Here we report the action of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) on gonadotropin and somatotropin release. Intraventricular injection of 1 microgram (0.2 nmole) GIP (2.5 microliters) produced a significant decrease in plasma FSH at 30 (p less than 0.02) and 60 min after its injection (p less than 0.01). The FSH-lowering effect of a higher dose of 5 micrograms (1 nmole) of GIP was already developed at 15 min (p less than 0.01) and was prolonged until the end of the experiment (60 min, p less than 0.05). No change in plasma LH was detected at any time during the experimental period. If 5 micrograms of estradiol-benzoate were given SC 48 hr prior to experiment, the initial values of FSH and LH were markedly decreased. In these animals GIP failed to influence plasma FSH and LH. When dispersed anterior pituitary cells from OVX rats were cultured overnight and incubated in vitro with GIP, the peptide was found to induce both FSH and LH release. Highly significant release occurred with the lowest dose tested of 10(-7) M and there was a dose-response effect for both hormones. The slope of the dose-response curve was similar for both FSH and LH release. GIP was less potent than LHRH which produced a greater stimulation of both FSH and LH release at a dose of 10(-9) M than did 10(-7) M GIP. The two peptides had an additive effect on the release of both FSH and LH.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Influence of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucose on the regulation of glucagon secretion by pancreatic alpha cells

The effects of glucose and GIP on glucagon secretion were studied in perifused microdissected murine pancreatic islets. Glucagon levels were determined in effluent samples collected at 1-min intervals by radioimmunoassay using the glucagon-specific antibody, 30 K. There was no significant difference in the total amount (7740 +/- 212 pg vs 8630 +/- 36 pg, n = 10) of glucagon secreted over a 20 min period when the glucose concentration was alternately shifted between 5.5 mM and 11.1 mM, respectively. However, 22.2 mM glucose profoundly suppressed glucagon secretion. The suppressive effect of high glucose on glucagon release was partially, yet significantly, reversed by the presence of GIP, as glucagon secretion increased from a non-detectable level at 22.2 mM glucose alone to 10,175 +/- 145 pg, n = 10 (P less than 0.01). The glucagonotropic effect of GIP was dose-dependent in the range of 2 x 10(-9) - 2 x 10(-7) M, at 11.1 mM glucose. Our data show that GIP is able to substantially reverse the suppressive effect of a high glucose load on glucagon secretion.     

Effect of exogenous or endogenous gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) on plasma triglyceride responses in rats.

We examined the effects of exogenous and endogenous GIP on plasma triglyceride levels in rats, pretreated with a fat-enriched diet, during intraduodenal infusion of a lipid test meal (Lipomul, 8 ml/h). Following the fat load the plasma triglyceride levels increased nearly linearly from a fasting value of 0.621 +/- 0.031 mmol/l to 3.32 +/- 0.403 mmol/l at 150 min. Simultaneously, the plasma GIP levels rose from 47.1 +/- 5.1 at fasting to a peak value of 268.4 +/- 32.2 pmol/l at 120 min. When porcine GIP was infused intravenously during the fat load, the plasma triglyceride increments were significantly smaller (control 1.64 +/- 0.264 mmol/l versus 0.949 +/- 0.114 mmol/l during GIP infusion at 60 min; p less than 0.002). GIP infusion in the absence of the fat load did not change fasting triglyceride levels. The effect of endogenous GIP was investigated by neutralization of GIP by injection of GIP antiserum (0.3 ml). Rats pretreated with the antiserum exhibited a significantly greater triglyceride increment late in the time course of the fat load. These data demonstrate that exogenous and endogenous GIP are able to lower the plasma triglyceride response to a fat load. Both, inhibition of fat absorption or stimulation of triglyceride uptake by peripheral tissues may be responsible for the GIP effects. The gut peptide GIP seems to represent an important hormonal regulator of postprandial triglyceride response.     

Islet amyloid polypeptide inhibits glucagon release and exerts a dual action on insulin release from isolated islets

We have studied the influence of a wide concentration range of islet amyloid polypeptide (IAPP) on both glucagon and insulin release stimulated by various types of secretagogues. In an islet incubation medium devoid of glucose, the rate of glucagon release being high, we observed a marked suppressive action by low concentrations of IAPP, 10(-10) and 10(-8) M, on glucagon release. Similarly, glucagon release stimulated by L-arginine, the cholinergic agonist carbachol, or the phosphodiesterase inhibitor isobutylmethyl xanthine (IBMX), an activator of the cyclic AMP system, was inhibited by IAPP in the 10(-10) and 10(-8) M concentration range. Moreover, basal glucagon release at 7 and 10 mM glucose was suppressed by IAPP. In contrast, IAPP exerted a dual action on insulin release. Hence, low concentrations of IAPP brought about a modest increase of basal insulin secretion at 7 mM glucose and also of insulin release stimulated by carbachol. High concentrations of IAPP, however, inhibited insulin release stimulated by glucose (10 and 16.7 mM), IBMX, carbachol and L-arginine. In conclusion, our data suggest that IAPP has complex effects on islet hormone secretion serving as an inhibitor of glucagon release and having a dual action on insulin secretion exerting mainly a negative feedback on stimulated and a positive feedback on basal insulin release.     

Effect of endogenous gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) on the removal of triacylglycerol in dogs

In order to clarify the effect of endogenous gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) upon lipid metabolism, the removal of intravenously administered triacylglycerol was investigated following an oral glucose or galactose load in dogs. After an overnight fast, the triacylglycerol emulsion was infused at a constant rate of 1 ml/min for 90 min, and glucose, galactose or tap water was orally administered at 30 min. Blood glucose increased after the glucose load but it did not change following the galactose load or water ingestion. Plasma insulin increased after the glucose load but did not change after galactose or tap water ingestion. Plasma glucagon did not show any discernible change in the three experimental groups. Plasma GIP increased following the glucose or galactose load to 4360 or 1653 pg/ml, respectively. Plasma triacylglycerol increased to the same levels at 30 min in the three experimental groups. The peak levels of plasma triacylglycerol and integrated plasma triacylglycerol for 150 min did not differ in the three groups. Moreover, there was no difference in the removal rate of plasma triacylglycerol following the withdrawal of the fat emulsion. It is concluded from the present study that endogenously released GIP does not elicit any effect upon triacylglycerol removal.     

Impairment of the insulinotropic effect of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) in obese and diabetic rats is related to the down-regulation of its pancreatic receptors

The association of obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus has been recognized for years. In type 2 diabetes, there is a possibility that an important part of the impaired insulin secretion is due to the gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) hormone. This study investigated changes that occur in the pancreatic GIP receptors' (GIP-Rs) expression and in GIP secretion in obese and type 2 diabetic rats and its relation to plasma glucose and insulin levels during oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) compared to control rats. During the first 20 min of the OGTT, both the obese and the diabetic rats had a significant increase in the glucose excursion and a significant decrease in early-insulin secretion compared to the control group, with more prominent changes in the diabetic group. The obese rats had a significant increase in fasting GIP level and in the incremental change of GIP from 0 to 20 min (GIP Delta 0-20: 60.1 + or - 6.66 pmol/l) compared to that of the control (33.96 + or - 4.69 pmol/l) and the diabetic (29.34 + or - 2.62 pmol/l) group, which were not significantly different from each other. However, there was a significant decrease in GIP-Rs expression in both the obese (88.07 + or - 10.36 microg/ml) and diabetic (87.51 + or - 4.72 microg/ml) groups compared to the control group (120.35 + or - 8.06 microg/ml). During the second hour of the OGTT, plasma GIP was decreasing in all groups, however, the obese group had a significant hyperinsulinemia compared to the other two groups. Moreover, the diabetic group had a significantly lower plasma insulin level until the 90 min interval and thereafter it showed a non-significant difference compared to the control group. In conclusion, both obese and diabetic rats had an impaired early-phase insulinotropic effect of GIP due to impaired gene expression of GIP-Rs which could be a potential target to prevent transition of obesity to diabetes and to improve insulin secretion in the latter.     

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) concentration in human amniotic fluid

Several studies report that placenta and amniotic fluid (AF) may be a source of many peptide hormones. Although the presence of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) in amniotic fluid has not been described, it is present in the fetal gut. In this study we report the presence of insulin and GIP in human AF of normal and diabetic pregnancies. GIP concentrations in the AF collected two hours after an arginine tolerance test (ATT), at 34-36 weeks of gestation, were evaluated in 8 normal and 53 diabetic pregnant women. GIP was found in all samples of AF. The mean AF-GIP concentrations were 133 +/- 19 pmol/l in controls and 111 +/- 6 pmol/l in the diabetics, being the GIP values of the diabetics belonging to White Class B significantly lower than those of normals (99 +/- 10 vs 133 +/- 19 pmol/l). The GIP/IRI molar ratio was significantly lower in the diabetics than in controls (1.2 +/- 0.2 vs 2.5 +/- 0.4); moreover the GIP/IRI molar ratio was significantly higher in AF collected from diabetic pregnant women who delivered overweight infants than in AF of normal weight infants or controls. This finding would suggest a negative feedback mechanism between GIP and insulin in fetus.     

Electronimmunocytochemical evidence for the K cell localization of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) im man

Summary Application of the semithin-thin section technique indicates that the previously proposed identification of the ultrastructurally-defined K cell with the immunocytochemically-defined GIP cell is essentially correct.The K cell is established as a distinct entity and the way is open for an explanation of its role in the physiology and pathology of the gastroenteropancreatic system.     

Electronimmunocytochemical evidence for the K cell localization of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) in man.

Application of the semithin-thin section technique indicates that the previously proposed identification of the ultrastructurally-defined K cell with the immunocytochemically-defined GIP cell is essentially correct. The K cell is established as a distinct entity and the way is open for an explanation of its role in the physiology and pathology of the gastroenteropancreatic system.     

Response of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) to oral administration of nutrients in normal and pancreatectomized dogs

In order to clarify the response of plasma gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) to various nutrients and to investigate the relationship between the pancreas and GIP secretion, an experimental study was performed using normal and pancreatectomized dogs. Oral administration of glucose (2 g/kg) or butter (2 g/kg) resulted in an increase of plasma GIP in five normal dogs. In contrast, oral administration of arginine (1 g/kg) did not produce any discernible changes in plasma GIP in normal dogs. In a group of nine pancreatectomized dogs, the fasting level of plasma GIP did not differ from that of the control group. Furthermore, glucose ingestion in the pancreatectomized group resulted in the same pattern and the same degree of change in plasma GIP as it did in the normal controls. In contrast, plasma GIP did not change at all following fat loading in the pancreatectomized group. However, butter with pancreatic enzymes elicited a significant rise of plasma GIP in the pancreatectomized dogs. The present study indicates that plasma GIP increases following oral administration of glucose or fat but not arginine. Furthermore, it is demonstrated that GIP secretion following fat ingestion occurs only after fat digestion by pancreatic enzymes. In addition, the findings observed in the present study do not support the existence of feedback effect of insulin on GIP secretion.     

Effects of cholecystokinin, secretin, and pancreatic polypeptide on secretion of gastric inhibitory polypeptide, insulin, and glucagon

Although the capacity of food components to cause more insulin secretion when given orally than when given intravenously is related significantly to increased plasma concentration of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP), stimulated only by the oral route, questions arise as to what extent other gastrointestinal hormones modify insulin secretion either directly or by influencing the secretion of GIP. The triacontatriapeptide form of cholecystokinin (CCK₃₃), infused in dose gradients intravenously in dogs increases insulin secretion, and comparably to equimolar doses of the carboxy-terminal octapeptide of cholecystokin (CCK₈); neither compound changes fasting plasma levels of GIP or glucose. Glucagon was increased only by the largest dose of CCK₈ (0.27 ug/kg). Unlike the situation with GIP, it is not necessary to increase the plasma glucose above fasting level to obtain the insulin-releasing action of CCK. When glucose is infused intravenously (2 g in 0.5 min) at the beginning of a 15-minute infusion of CCK₈ (10 ng/kg/min), the amount of insulin release is greater than is produced by CCK₈ or glucose alone. In the same type of experiment, the infusion of GIP, in equimolar amounts as CCK₈, plus glucose causes no more insulin secretion than is stimulated by glucose alone. Secretin has only a small stimulating action on insulin release, and pancreatic polypeptide (PP) has no effect. Neither secretin nor PP affects GIP secretion, whether either is given alone, or together, or with CCK₈. Either secretin or CCK₈ inhibits oral glucose-stimulated increase in plasma GIP. These inhibitory effects are probably very much related to the hormone-induced decrease in gastric emptying, but changes in somatostatin secretion and other hormones possibly exert contributory actions. In conclusion, GIP in certain dose ranges has been reported to cause major increase in insulin secretion, but we showed that the insulin-releasing action of a small dose of glucose (2 g) infused intravenously was not augmented by GIP (44.5 ng/kg/min), although it was significantly increased by an equimolar dose of CCK₈. When plasma glucose was maintained at a fasting level, gradient equimolar dosages of CCK₈ and CCK₃₃ had comparable insulin-releasing action; GIP had no effect.     

Ultrastructural localization of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) in a well characterized endocrine cell of canine duodenal mucosa

The polypeptide hormone GIP has been localized ultrastructurally by using specific, monoclonal GIP antibodies and an immunogold technique on aldehyde-osmium fixed specimens of dog duodenal mucosa. A single type of cell showing round, homogeneous, fairly osmiophilic granules with closely applied membrane and a mean size of 188 nm +/- 34 SD has been identified as the GIP cell.     

Ultrastructural localization of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) in a well characterized endocrine cell of canine duodenal mucosa

Summary The polypeptide hormone GIP has been localized ultrastructurally by using specific, monoclonal GIP antibodies and an immunogold technique on aldehyde-osmium fixed specimens of dog duodenal mucosa. A single type of cell showing round, homogeneous, fairly osmiophilic granules with closely applied membrane and a mean size of 188 nm±34 SD has been identified as the GIP cell.     

Active immunisation against gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) improves blood glucose control in an animal model of obesity-diabetes

Recent research suggests that long-term ablation of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) receptor signalling can reverse or prevent many of the metabolic abnormalities associated with dietary and genetically induced obesity-diabetes. The present study was designed to assess the sub-chronic effects of passive or active immunisation against GIP in ob/ob mice. Initial acute administration of GIP antibody together with oral glucose in ob/ob mice significantly increased the glycaemic excursion compared to controls (p<0.05). This was associated with a significant reduction (p<0.05) in the overall glucose-mediated insulin response. However, sub-chronic passive GIP immunisation was not associated with any changes in body weight, food intake or metabolic control. In contrast, active immunisation against GIP for 56 days in young ob/ob mice resulted in significantly (p<0.05) reduced circulating plasma glucose concentrations on day 56 compared to controls. There was a tendency for decreased circulating insulin in GIP immunised mice. The glycaemic response to intraperitoneal glucose was correspondingly improved (p<0.05) in mice immunised against GIP. Glucose-stimulated insulin levels were not significantly different from controls. Furthermore, insulin sensitivity was similar in mice immunised against GIP and respective controls. Overall, the results reveal that active, as opposed to passive, immunisation against GIP improves blood glucose control ob/ob mice.     

Interaction of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) with the insulin-secreting pancreatic beta cell line, In lll: characteristics of GIP binding sites

The interaction of GIP with its receptors in the hamster pancreatic insulin-secreting beta cell line, In lll, has been analyzed. 125I-labelled GIP used as tracer showed the same affinity as native GIP for the GIP binding sites. Binding of the tracer was time, temperature and cell concentration dependent. It was saturable, reversible and highly specific. Under equilibrium conditions, i.e. 2 hours at 13 degrees C, 20% and 25% of the tracer and of GIP binding sites were inactivated, respectively. Native GIP inhibited binding of 125I-labelled GIP in a dose-dependent manner, saturation of the GIP binding sites being obtained at 3. 10(-7) M peptide. Two types of GIP binding sites were found by Scatchard analysis, a small population with a high affinity for GIP (KD = 7 nM) and a large population with a low affinity (KD = 800 nM). The biphasic dissociation process confirmed the GIP binding sites heterogeneity. Apart from GIP, no peptide tested influenced the binding of the 125I-labelled GIP. The present data represents the first analysis of functionally relevant GIP binding sites in a insulin-secreting cell.     

The reduction in hepatic insulin clearance after oral glucose is not mediated by gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP)

Since the C-peptide/insulin ratio is reduced after oral glucose ingestion, the incretin hormone gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) has been assumed to decrease hepatic insulin extraction. It was the aim of the present study to evaluate the effects of GIP on insulin extraction. Seventy-eight healthy subjects (27 male, 51 female, 43+/-11 years) were subjected to (a). an oral glucose tolerance test and (b). an intravenous injection of 20 pmol GIP/kg body weight, with capillary and venous blood samples collected over 30 min for insulin, C-peptide and GIP (specific immunoassays). Following GIP administration, plasma concentrations of total and intact GIP reached to peak levels of 80+/-7 and 54+/-5 pmol/l, respectively (p<0.0001). The rise in insulin after oral glucose and after intravenous GIP administration significantly exceeded the rise in C-peptide (p<0.0001). Estimating insulin extraction from the total integrated insulin and C-peptide concentrations (AUCs), only the oral glucose load (p<0.0001), but not the intravenous GIP administration (p=0.18) significantly reduced insulin clearance. Therefore, insulin clearance is reduced after an oral glucose load. This effect does not appear to be mediated by GIP.     

Effect of bombesin and gastrin-releasing peptide on the release of gastric inhibitory polypeptide and insulin in rats

The objective of this study was to determine whether bombesin- or gastrin-releasing peptide-induced release of insulin occurs before or after the release of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) in rats. The present results demonstrate that GIP release occurs before insulin release and suggest that bombesin-like peptides and GIP interact to stimulate insulin secretion.     

The isolation and sequencing of human gastric inhibitory peptide (GIP)

Human GIP 1-42 and fragments of human GIP corresponding to GIP 10-42, GIP 11-42, and GIP 17-42 were isolated from acid-ethanol extracts of human small intestines with the aid of an anti-GIP serum specific for the extreme C-terminal portion of the GIP molecule. The full sequence of human GIP has been established by Edman degradation of these peptides and fragments thereof by automatic gas-phase sequencing. Human GIP differs from porcine GIP at residues 18 and 34. The sequence of human GIP is thus: (Formula: see text) Amino acid residues 18 and 34 are Arg and Ser, respectively, in porcine GIP.     

Understanding interactions of gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) with its G-protein coupled receptor through NMR and molecular modeling.

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP, or glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide) is a 42-amino acid incretin hormone moderating glucose-induced insulin secretion. Antidiabetic therapy based on GIP holds great promise because of the fact that its insulinotropic action is highly dependent on the level of glucose, overcoming the sideeffects of hypoglycemia associated with the current therapy of Type 2 diabetes. The truncated peptide, GIP(1-30)NH2, has the same activity as the full length native peptide. We have studied the structure of GIP(1-30)NH2 and built a model of its G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR). The structure of GIP(1-30)NH2 in DMSO-d6 and H2O has been studied using 2D NMR (total correlation spectroscopy (TOCSY), nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY), double quantum filtered-COSY (DQF-COSY), 13C-heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) experiments, and its conformation built by MD simulations with the NMR data as constraints. The peptide in DMSO-d6 exhibits an alpha-helix between residues Ile12 and Lys30 with a discontinuity at residues Gln19 and Gln20. In H2O, the alpha-helix starts at Ile7, breaks off at Gln19, and then continues right through to Lys30. GIP(1-30)NH2 has all the structural features of peptides belonging to family B1 GPCRs, which are characterized by a coil at the N-terminal and a long C-terminal alpha-helix with or without a break. A model of the seven transmembrane (TM) helices of the GIP receptor (GIPR) has been built on the principles of comparative protein modeling, using the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin as a template. The N-terminal domain of GIPR has been constructed from the NMR structure of the N-terminal of corticoptropin releasing factor receptor (CRFR), a family B1 GCPR. The intra and extra cellular loops and the C-terminal have been modeled from fragments retrieved from the PDB. On the basis of the experimental data available for some members of family B1 GPCRs, four pairs of constraints between GIP(1-30)NH2 and its receptor were used in the FTDOCK program, to build the complete model of the GIP(1-30)NH2:GIPR complex. The model can rationalize the various experimental observations including the potency of the truncated GIP peptide. This work is the first complete model at the atomic level of GIP(1-30)NH2 and of the complex with its GPCR.