Pocketknife tRNA hypothesis: Anticodons in mammal mitochondrial tRNA side-arm loops translate proteins?

Peptide elongation proceeds by tRNA anticodons recognizing mRNA codons coding for the tRNA's cognate amino acid. Putatively, tRNAs possess three anticodons because tRNA side and anticodon-arms form similar stem-loop structures. Two lines of evidence indicate that mammal mitochondrial tRNA sidearms function as anticodons: numbers of TΨC-arm ‘anticodons’ matching specific cognates coevolve with that cognate's usage in mitochondrial genomes; and predicted ‘tetragene’ numbers, genes coded by quadruplet codons (tetracodons), coevolve with numbers of expanded anticodons in D-arms, as previously observed between tetragenes and antisense tRNA expanded anticodons. Sidearms with long stems and high GC contents contribute most to tRNA sidearm-tetragene coevolution. Results are compatible with two hypothetical mechanisms for translation by side-arms: crossovers exchange anticodon- and side-arms; tRNA sidearms are excised, aminoacylated and function as isolated stem-loop hairpins (more probable for long, respectively stable branches). Isolated sidearms would resemble recently described armless ‘minimal’ tRNAs. Isolated hairpins might most parsimoniously explain observed patterns. tRNA genes templating for three, rather than one functional tRNA, compress minimal genome size. Results suggest fused tRNA halves form(ed) modern tRNAs, isolated tRNA subparts occasionally translate proteins. Results confirm translational activity by antisense tRNAs, whose anticodons also coevolve with codon usages. Accounting for antisense anticodons improves results for sidearm anticodons.     

Specific occurrence of selenium in enzymes and amino acid tRNAs

In contrast to the widespread ability of bacteria, plants, and animals to incorporate selenium nonspecifically into proteins in the form of selenomethionine residues, the selenoamino acid selenocysteine occurs as a highly specific component of a few selenium-dependent enzymes. Selenocysteine has been identified in glycine reductase, formate dehydrogenase, and hydrogenase of bacterial origin and glutathione peroxidase from mammalian and avian sources. In these enzymes there is evidence that the selenol group, which is largely ionized at physiological pH, functions as a redox center. It now seems clear, from studies with both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, that the UGA opal stop codon is used to specify the cotranslational insertion of selenocysteine into proteins. The factors that allow this unusual use of the stop codon are, however, unknown. The occurrence of selenium as a normal constituent of several bacterial tRNA species has been established. The presence of a selenonucleoside, 5-methylaminomethyl-2-selenouridine, in the first or wobble position of the anticodons of certain glutamate and lysine iso-acceptor species influences codon-anticodon interaction and thus may serve to regulate translational processes. The biosynthesis of the selenonucleoside appears to involve the ATP-dependent activation of the sulfur in a preformed 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridine residue in tRNA and replacement of the sulfur with selenium.     

Genetic code in evolution: switching species-specific aminoacylation with a peptide transplant.

The genetic code is established in aminoacylation reactions whereby amino acids are joined to tRNAs bearing the anticodons of the genetic code. Paradoxically, while the code is universal there are many examples of species-specific aminoacylations, where a tRNA from one taxonomic domain cannot be acylated by a synthetase from another. Here we consider an example where a human, but not a bacterial, tRNA synthetase charges its cognate eukaryotic tRNA and where the bacterial, but not the human, enzyme charges the cognate bacterial tRNA. While the bacterial enzyme has less than 10% sequence identity with the human enzyme, transplantation of a 39 amino acid peptide from the human into the bacterial enzyme enabled the latter to charge its eukaryotic tRNA counterpart in vitro and in vivo. Conversely, substitution of the corresponding peptide of the bacterial enzyme for that of the human enabled the human enzyme to charge bacterial tRNA. This peptide element discriminates a base pair difference in the respective tRNA acceptor stems. Thus, functionally important co-adaptations of a synthetase to its tRNA act as small modular units that can be moved across taxonomic domains and thereby preserve the universality of the code.     

Lysine tRNAs from rat liver: lysine tRNA sequences are highly conserved

The two major lysine tRNAs from rat liver, tRNA2Lys and tRNA5Lys, were sequenced by rapid gel or chromatogram readout methods. The major tRNA2Lys differs from a minor form only by a base pair in positions 29 and 41; both tRNAs have an unidentified nucleotide, U**, in the third position of the anticodon. Although highly related, the major tRNA2Lys and tRNA5Lys differ in four base pairs and four unpaired nucleotides, including the first position of the anticodons, but have the same base pair in positions 29 and 41. The three tRNAs maintain a m2G-U pair in the acceptor stem. Detection of this m2G is in contrast to other reports of lysine tRNAs. Sequences of lysine tRNAs are strongly conserved in higher eukaryotes.     

A mechanism for stop codon recognition by the ribosome: a bioinformatic approach.

Protein synthesis in ribosomes requires two kinds of tRNAs: initiation and elongation. The former initiates the process (formylmethionine tRNA in prokaryotes and special methionine tRNA in eukaryotes). The latter participates in the synthesis proper, recognizing the sense codons. Synthesis is also assisted by special proteins: initiation, elongation, and termination factors. The termination factors are necessary to recognize stop codons (UAG, UGA, and UAA) and to release the complete protein chain from the elongation tRNA preceding a stop codon. No termination tRNA capable of recognizing stop codons by their anticodons is known. The termination factors are thought to do this. In the large ribosomal RNA, we found two sites that, like tRNAs, contain the anticodon hairpin but with triplets complementary to stop codons. One site is hairpin 69 from domain IV; the other site is hairpin 89, domain V. By analogy, we call them termination tRNAs: Ter-tRNA1 and Ter-tRNA2, respectively, even though they transport no amino acids, and suggest that they directly pair to stop codons. The termination factors only aid in this recognition, making it specific and reliable. A strong argument in favor of our hypothesis comes from vertebrate mitochondria. They are known to acquire two new stop codons, AGA and AGG. In the standard code, these are two out of six arginine codons. We revealed that the corresponding anticodons, UCU and CCU, have evolved in Ter-tRNA1 of these mitochondria.     

Recycling of Aborted Ribosomal 50S Subunit-Nascent Chain-tRNA Complexes by the Heat Shock Protein Hsp15

When heat shock prematurely dissociates a translating bacterial ribosome, its 50S subunit is prevented from reinitiating protein synthesis by tRNA covalently linked to the unfinished protein chain that remains threaded through the exit tunnel. Hsp15, a highly upregulated bacterial heat shock protein, reactivates such dead-end complexes. Here, we show with cryo-electron microscopy reconstructions and functional assays that Hsp15 translocates the tRNA moiety from the A site to the P site of stalled 50S subunits. By stabilizing the tRNA in the P site, Hsp15 indirectly frees up the A site, allowing a release factor to land there and cleave off the tRNA. Such a release factor must be stop codon independent, suggesting a possible role for a poorly characterized class of putative release factors that are upregulated by cellular stress, lack a codon recognition domain and are conserved in eukaryotes.     

Mutation and selection on the wobble nucleotide in tRNA anticodons in marine bivalve mitochondrial genomes

Background

Animal mitochondrial genomes typically encode one tRNA for each synonymous codon family, so that each tRNA anticodon essentially has to wobble to recognize two or four synonymous codons. Several factors have been hypothesized to determine the nucleotide at the wobble site of a tRNA anticodon in mitochondrial genomes, such as the codon-anticodon adaptation hypothesis, the wobble versatility hypothesis, the translation initiation and elongation conflict hypothesis, and the wobble cost hypothesis.

Principal Findings

In this study, we analyzed codon usage and tRNA anticodon wobble sites of 29 marine bivalve mitochondrial genomes to evaluate features of the wobble nucleotides in tRNA anticodons. The strand-specific mutation bias favors G and T on the H strand in all the 29 marine bivalve mitochondrial genomes. A bias favoring G and T is also visible in the third codon positions of protein-coding genes and the wobble sites of anticodons, rejecting that codon usage bias drives the wobble sites of tRNA anticodons or tRNA anticodon bias drives the evolution of codon usage. Almost all codon families (98.9%) from marine bivalve mitogenomes support the wobble versatility hypothesis. There are a few interesting exceptions involving tRNA^Trp with an anticodon CCA fixed in Pectinoida species, tRNA^Ser with a GCU anticodon fixed in Mytiloida mitogenomes, and the uniform anticodon CAU of tRNA^Met translating the AUR codon family.

Conclusions/Significance

These results demonstrate that most of the nucleotides at the wobble sites of tRNA anticodons in marine bivalve mitogenomes are determined by wobble versatility. Other factors such as the translation initiation and elongation conflict, and the cost of wobble translation may contribute to the determination of the wobble nucleotide in tRNA anticodons. The finding presented here provides valuable insights into the previous hypotheses of the wobble nucleotide in tRNA anticodons by adding some new evidence.     

Genetic code from tRNA point of view

The possible codon-anticodon pairings follow the standard genetic code, yet in a different mode. The corresponding rules for decoding sequence of the codons in mRNA with tRNA may be called "tRNA code". In this paper we analyse the mutational and translational stability of such tRNA code. Our approach is based on the model of "ambiguous intermediate" and on the study of underlying block structure and Eulerean graph technique. It is shown that the wobble rules and the reduced number of tRNA anticodons strongly affect the mutational and translational stability of the code. The selection of tRNA anticodons, besides the optimization of translation, also ensures the more reliable start and, to a lesser extent, the stop of translation. The attribution of tRNA anticodons to the groups [WWW, WWS, SWW, SWS] and [SSS, SSW, WSS, WSW] as well as [MMM, MMK, KMM, KMK] and [KKK, KKM, MKK, MKM] clearly correlates with class I and class II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and obeys the principle of the optimal coding in both cases. Both W-S and M-K groupings also refer to the encoding of amino acids with the large and small side-chain volumes, which may provide such an attribution. The higher variability of tRNA code agrees with the suggestions that the variations in an assignment of tRNA anticodons may serve as the driving force generating the different variants of the genetic code.     

A cluster of nine tRNA genes between ribosomal gene operons in Bacillus subtilis.

A cluster of nine tRNA genes located in the 1-kb region between ribosomal operons rrnJ and rrnW in Bacillus subtilis has been cloned and sequenced. This cluster contains the genes for tRNA(UACVal), tRNA(UGUThr), tRNA(UUULys), tRNA(UAGLeu). tRNA(GCCGly), tRNA(UAALeu), tRNA(ACGArg), tRNA(UGGPro), and tRNA(UGCAla). The newly discovered tRNA gene cluster combines features of the 3'-end of trnI, a cluster of 6 tRNA genes between ribosomal operons rrnI and rrnH, and of the 5'-end of trnB, a cluster of 21 tRNA genes found immediately 3' to rrnB. Neither the tRNA(UAGLeu) gene nor its product has been found previously in B. subtilis. With the discovery of this new set of tRNA genes, a total of 60 such genes have now been found in B. subtilis. These known genes account for almost all of the tRNA hybridizing restriction fragments of the B. subtilis genome. The 60 known tRNA genes of B. subtilis code for only 28 different anticodons, compared with a total of 41 different anticodons for 78 tRNA genes in Escherichia coli. This may indicate that B. subtilis does not need as many anticodons because of more flexible translation rules, similar to the situation in Mycoplasma capricolum.     

Idiosyncratic tuning of tRNAs to achieve uniform ribosome binding

The binding of seven tRNA anticodons to their complementary codons on Escherichia coli ribosomes was substantially impaired, as compared with the binding of their natural tRNAs, when they were transplanted into tRNA(2)(Ala). An analysis of chimeras composed of tRNA(2)(Ala) and various amounts of either tRNA(3)(Gly) or tRNA(2)(Arg) indicates that the presence of the parental 32-38 nucleotide pair is sufficient to restore ribosome binding of the transplanted anticodons. Furthermore, mutagenesis of tRNA(2)(Ala) showed that its highly conserved A32-U38 pair serves to weaken ribosome affinity. We propose that this negative binding determinant is used to offset the very tight codon-anticodon interaction of tRNA(2)(Ala). This suggests that each tRNA sequence has coevolved with its anticodon to tune ribosome affinity to a value that is the same for all tRNAs.     

Evolution of mitochondrial gene content: gene loss and transfer to the nucleus

Mitochondrial gene content is highly variable across extant eukaryotes. The number of mitochondrial protein genes varies from 3 to 67, while tRNA gene content varies from 0 to 27. Moreover, these numbers exclude the many diverse lineages of non-respiring eukaryotes that lack a mitochondrial genome yet still contain a mitochondrion, albeit one often highly derived in ultrastructure and metabolic function, such as the hydrogenosome. Diversity in tRNA gene content primarily reflects differential usage of imported tRNAs of nuclear origin. In the case of protein genes, most of this diversity reflects differential degrees of functional gene transfer to the nucleus, with more minor contributions resulting from gene loss from the cell as a consequence of either substitution via a functional nuclear homolog or the cell's dispensation of the function of the gene product. The tempo and pattern of mitochondrial gene loss is highly episodic, both across the broad sweep of eukaryotes and within such well-studied groups as angiosperms. All animals, some plants, and certain other groups of eukaryotes are mired in profound stases in mitochondrial gene content, whereas other lineages have experienced relatively frequent gene loss. Loss and transfer to the nucleus of ribosomal protein and succinate dehydrogenase genes has been especially frequent, sporadic, and episodic during angiosperm evolution. Potential mechanisms for activation of transferred genes have been inferred, and intermediate stages in the process have been identified by comparative studies. Several hypotheses have been proposed for why mitochondrial genes are transferred to the nucleus, why mitochondria retain genomes, and why functional gene transfer is almost exclusively unidirectional.     

Human tRNAs with inosine 34 are essential to efficiently translate eukarya-specific low-complexity proteins

The modification of adenosine to inosine at the wobble position (I34) of tRNA anticodons is an abundant and essential feature of eukaryotic tRNAs. The expansion of inosine-containing tRNAs in eukaryotes followed the transformation of the homodimeric bacterial enzyme TadA, which generates I34 in tRNA^Arg and tRNA^Leu, into the heterodimeric eukaryotic enzyme ADAT, which modifies up to eight different tRNAs. The emergence of ADAT and its larger set of substrates, strongly influenced the tRNA composition and codon usage of eukaryotic genomes. However, the selective advantages that drove the expansion of I34-tRNAs remain unknown. Here we investigate the functional relevance of I34-tRNAs in human cells and show that a full complement of these tRNAs is necessary for the translation of low-complexity protein domains enriched in amino acids cognate for I34-tRNAs. The coding sequences for these domains require codons translated by I34-tRNAs, in detriment of synonymous codons that use other tRNAs. I34-tRNA-dependent low-complexity proteins are enriched in functional categories related to cell adhesion, and depletion in I34-tRNAs leads to cellular phenotypes consistent with these roles. We show that the distribution of these low-complexity proteins mirrors the distribution of I34-tRNAs in the phylogenetic tree.     

Comparison of base composition and codon usage in insect mitochondrial genomes

Insects, the most biodiverse taxonomic group, have high AT content in their mitochondrial genomes. Although codon usage tends to be AT-rich, base composition and codon usage of mitochondrial genomes may vary among taxa. Thus, we compare base composition and codon usage patterns of 49 insect mitochondrial genomes. For protein coding genes, AT content is as high as 80% in the Hymenoptera and Lepidoptera and as low as 72% in the Orthopotera. The AT content is high at positions 1 and 3, but A content is low at position 2. A close correlation occurs between codon usage and tRNA abundance in nuclear genomes. Optimal codons can pair well with the antr codons of the most abundant tRNAs. One tRNA gene translates a synonymous codon family in vertebrate mitochondrial genomes and these tRNA anticodons can pair with optimal codons. However, optimal codons cannot pair with anticodons in mtDNA ofCochiiomyia hominivorax (Dipteral: CaLliphoridae). Ten optimal codons cannot pair with tRNA anticodons in all 49 insect mitochondrial genomes; non-optimal codon-anticodon usage is common and codon usage is not influenced by tRNA abundance.     

Avoidance of antisense, antiterminator tRNA anticodons in vertebrate mitochondria

Protein synthesis (translation) stops at stop codons, codons not complemented by tRNA anticodons. tRNAs matching stops, antitermination (Ter) tRNAs, prevent translational termination, producing dysfunctional proteins. Genomes avoid tRNAs with anticodons whose complement (the anticodon of the ‘antisense’ tRNA) matches stops. This suggests that antisense tRNAs, which also form cloverleaves, are occasionally expressed. Mitochondrial antisense tRNA expression is plausible, because both DNA strands are transcribed as single RNAs, and tRNA structures signal RNA maturation. Results describe potential antisense Ter tRNAs in mammalian mitochondrial genomes detected by tRNAscan-SE, and evidence for adaptations preventing translational antitermination: genomes possessing Ter tRNAs use less corresponding stop codons; antisense Ter tRNAs form weaker cloverleaves than homologuous non-Ter antisense tRNAs; and genomic stop codon usages decrease with stabilities of codon-anticodon interactions and of Ter tRNA cloverleaves. This suggests that antisense tRNAs frequently function in translation. Results suggest that opposite strand coding is exceptional in modern genes, yet might be frequent for mitochondrial tRNAs. This adds antisense tRNA templating to other mitochondrial tRNA functions: sense tRNA templating, formation and regulation of secondary (light strand DNA) replication origins. Antitermination probably affects mitochondrial degenerative diseases and ageing: pathogenic mutations are twice as frequent in tRNAs with antisense Ter anticodons than in other tRNAs, and species lacking mitochondrial antisense Ter tRNAs have longer mean maximal lifespans than those possessing antisense Ter tRNAs.     

Identification and characterization of mouse TRMU gene encoding the mitochondrial 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate-methyltransferase

The nucleotide modification in tRNA plays a pivotal role in the fidelity of translational process. The mutated mitochondrial tRNA (mt tRNA) associated with human diseases often exhibited a defect in nucleotide modification at wobble position of anticodons. Recently, the product of trmU, 5-methylaminomethyl-2-thiouridylate-methyltransferase, has been shown to be one component of enzyme complex for the biosynthesis of mnm5s2U in the wobble position of the bacterial tRNAs. Here we report the identification and characterization of mouse TRMU homolog. A 1532 bp TRMU cDNA has been isolated and the genomic organization of TRMU has been elucidated. The mouse TRMU gene containing 11 exons encodes a 417 residue protein with a strong homology to the TRMU-like proteins of bacteria and other homologs related to tRNA modification. The mouse TRMU is ubiquitously expressed in various tissues, but abundantly in tissues with high metabolic rates including heart, liver and brain. Furthermore, immunofluorescence analysis of NIH3T3 cells expressing TRMU-GFP fusion protein demonstrated that the mouse Trmu localizes in mitochondria. These observations suggest that the mouse TRMU is a structural and functional homolog of bacterial TrmU, thereby playing a role in the mt tRNA modification and protein synthesis.     

Evolutionary constraints on the plastid tRNA set decoding methionine and isoleucine

The plastid (chloroplast) genomes of seed plants typically encode 30 tRNAs. Employing wobble and superwobble mechanisms, most codon boxes are read by only one or two tRNA species. The reduced set of plastid tRNAs follows the evolutionary trend of organellar genomes to shrink in size and coding capacity. A notable exception is the AUN codon box specifying methionine and isoleucine, which is decoded by four tRNA species in nearly all seed plants. However, three of these four tRNA genes were lost from the genomes of some parasitic plastid-containing lineages, possibly suggesting that less than four tRNA species could be sufficient to decode the triplets in the AUN box. To test this hypothesis, we have performed knockout experiments for the four AUN-decoding tRNAs in tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plastids. We find that all four tRNA genes are essential under both autotrophic and heterotrophic growth conditions, possibly suggesting tRNA import into plastids of parasitic plastid-bearing species. Phylogenetic analysis of the four plastid tRNA genes reveals striking conservation of all those bacterial features that are involved in discrimination between the different tRNA species containing CAU anticodons.     

Nematode-specific tRNAs that decode an alternative genetic code for leucine

Class II transfer RNAs (tRNAs), including tRNA(Leu) and tRNA(Ser), have an additional stem and loop structure, the long variable arm (V-arm). Here, we describe Class II tRNAs with a unique anticodon corresponding to neither leucine nor serine. Because these tRNAs are specifically conserved among the nematodes, we have called them 'nematode-specific V-arm-containing tRNAs' (nev-tRNAs). The expression of nev-tRNA genes in Caenorhabditis elegans was confirmed experimentally. A comparative sequence analysis suggested that the nev-tRNAs derived phylogenetically from tRNA(Leu). In vitro aminoacylation assays showed that nev-tRNA(Gly) and nev-tRNA(Ile) are only charged with leucine, which is inconsistent with their anticodons. Furthermore, the deletion and mutation of crucial determinants for leucylation in nev-tRNA led to a marked loss of activity. An in vitro translation analysis showed that nev-tRNA(Gly) decodes GGG as leucine instead of the universal glycine code, indicating that nev-tRNAs can be incorporated into ribosomes and participate in protein biosynthesis. Our findings provide the first example of unexpected tRNAs that do not consistently obey the general translation rules for higher eukaryotes.     

Why termination tRNAs have not been found? Because they are hidden in the large ribosomal RNA

It is well known that protein synthesis in ribosomes on mRNA requires two kinds of tRNAs: initiation and elongation. The former initiates the process (formylmethionine tRNA in prokaryotes and special methionine tRNA in eukaryotes). The latter participates in the synthesis proper, recognizing the sense codons. The synthesis is assisted by special proteins: initiation, elongation, and termination factors. The termination factors are necessary to recognize stop codons (UAG, UGA, and UAA) and to release the complete protein chain from the elongation tRNA preceding a stop codon. No termination tRNA capable of recognizing stop codons by its anticodon is known. The termination factors are thought to do this. We discovered in the large ribosomal RNA two regions that, like tRNAs, contain the anticodon hairpin, but with triplets complementary to stop codons. By analogy, we called them termination tRNAs (Ter-tRNA1 and Ter-tRNA2), though they transport no amino acids, and suggested them to directly recognize stop codons. The termination factors only condition such a recognition, making it specific and reliable (of course, they fulfill the hydrolysis of the ester bond between the polypeptide and tRNA). A strong argument in favor of our hypothesis came from vertebrate mitochondria. They acquired two new stop codons, AGA and AGG (in the standard code, they are two out of six arginine codons). We revealed that the corresponding anticodons appear in Ter-tRNA1.     

Initiation of Protein Synthesis in Mammalian Cells with Codons Other Than AUG and Amino Acids Other Than Methionine

Protein synthesis is initiated universally with the amino acid methionine. In Escherichia coli, studies with anticodon sequence mutants of the initiator methionine tRNA have shown that protein synthesis can be initiated with several other amino acids. In eukaryotic systems, however, a yeast initiator tRNA aminoacylated with isoleucine was found to be inactive in initiation in mammalian cell extracts. This finding raised the question of whether methionine is the only amino acid capable of initiation of protein synthesis in eukaryotes. In this work, we studied the activities, in initiation, of four different anticodon sequence mutants of human initiator tRNA in mammalian COS1 cells, using reporter genes carrying mutations in the initiation codon that are complementary to the tRNA anticodons. The mutant tRNAs used are aminoacylated with glutamine, methionine, and valine. Our results show that in the presence of the corresponding mutant initiator tRNAs, AGG and GUC can initiate protein synthesis in COS1 cells with methionine and valine, respectively. CAG initiates protein synthesis with glutamine but extremely poorly, whereas UAG could not be used to initiate protein synthesis with glutamine. We discuss the potential applications of the mutant initiator tRNA-dependent initiation of protein synthesis with codons other than AUG for studying the many interesting aspects of protein synthesis initiation in mammalian cells.