Two small protein families, DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN3 and FISSION1, are required for peroxisome fission in Arabidopsis

Peroxisomes are multi-functional organelles that differ in size and abundance depending on the species, cell type, developmental stage, and metabolic and environmental conditions. The PEROXIN11 protein family and the DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN3A (DRP3A) protein have been shown previously to play key roles in peroxisome division in Arabidopsis. To establish a mechanistic model of peroxisome division in plants, we employed forward and reverse genetic approaches to identify more proteins involved in this process. In this study, we identified three new components of the Arabidopsis peroxisome division apparatus: DRP3B, a homolog of DRP3A, and FISSION1A and 1B (FIS1A and 1B), two homologs of the yeast and mammalian FIS1 proteins that mediate the fission of peroxisomes and mitochondria by tethering the DRP proteins to the membrane. DRP3B is partially targeted to peroxisomes and causes defects in peroxisome fission when the gene function is disrupted. drp3A drp3B double mutants display stronger deficiencies than each single mutant parent with respect to peroxisome abundance, seedling establishment and plant growth, suggesting partial functional redundancy between DRP3A and DRP3B. In addition, FIS1A and FIS1B are each dual-targeted to peroxisomes and mitochondria; their mutants show growth inhibition and contain peroxisomes and mitochondria with incomplete fission, enlarged size and reduced number. Our results demonstrate that both DRP3 and FIS1 protein families contribute to peroxisome fission in Arabidopsis, and support the view that DRP and FIS1 orthologs are common components of the peroxisomal and mitochondrial division machineries in diverse eukaryotic species.     

Arabidopsis PEROXIN11c-e, FISSION1b, and DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN3A cooperate in cell cycle-associated replication of peroxisomes

Although participation of PEROXIN11 (PEX11), FISSION1 (FISl), and DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN (DRP) has been well established during induced peroxisome proliferation in response to external stimuli, their roles in cell cycle-associated constitutive replication/duplication have not been fully explored. Herein, bimolecular fluorescence complementation experiments with Arabidopsis thaliana suspension cells revealed homooligomerization of all five PEX11 isoforms (PEX11a-e) and heterooligomerizations of all five PEX11 isoforms with FIS1b, but not FIS1a nor DRP3A. Intracellular protein targeting experiments demonstrated that FIS1b, but not FIS1a nor DRP3A, targeted to peroxisomes only when coexpressed with PEX11d or PEX11e. Simultaneous silencing of PEX11c-e or individual silencing of DRP3A, but not FIS1a nor FIS1b, resulted in approximately 40% reductions in peroxisome number. During G2 in synchronized cell cultures, peroxisomes sequentially enlarged, elongated, and then doubled in number, which correlated with peaks in PEX11, FIS1, and DRP3A expression. Overall, these data support a model for the replication of preexisting peroxisomes wherein PEX11c, PEX11d, and PEX11e act cooperatively during G2 to promote peroxisome elongation and recruitment of FIS1b to the peroxisome membrane, where DRP3A stimulates fission of elongated peroxisomes into daughter peroxisomes, which are then distributed between daughter cells.     

The conserved fission complex on peroxisomes and mitochondria

Peroxisomes are eukaryotic organelles highly versatile and dynamic in content and abundance. Plant peroxisomes mediate various metabolic pathways, a number of which are completed sequentially in peroxisomes and other subcellular organelles, including mitochondria and chloroplasts. To understand how peroxisomal dynamics contribute to changes in plant physiology and adaptation, the multiplication pathways of peroxisomes are being dissected. Research in Arabidopsis thaliana has identified several evolutionarily conserved families of proteins in peroxisome division. These include five PEROXIN11 proteins (PEX11a to -e) that induce peroxisome elongation and the fission machinery, which is composed of three dynamin-related proteins (DRP3A, -3B and -5B) and DRP''s membrane receptor, FISSION1 (FIS1A and -1B). While the function of PEX11 is restricted to peroxisomes, the fission factors are more promiscuous. DRP3 and FIS1 proteins are shared between peroxisomes and mitochondria, and DRP5B plays a dual role in the division of chloroplasts and peroxisomes. Analysis of the Arabidopsis genome suggests that higher plants may also contain functional homologs of the yeast Mdv1/Caf4 proteins, adaptor proteins that link DRPs to FIS1 on the membrane of both peroxisomes and mitochondria. Sharing a conserved fission machine between these metabolically linked subcellular compartments throughout evolution may have some biological significance.Key words: Arabidopsis, peroxisomal and mitochondrial division, dynamin-related protein (DRP), FISSION1 (FIS1), mitochondrial division 1 (Mdv1), CCR4p-associated factor 4 (Caf4)Peroxisomes are single membrane-delimited organelles involved in a variety of metabolic pathways essential to development.¹ Plant peroxisomes participate in processes such as lipid mobilization, photorespiration, detoxification, hormone biosynthesis and metabolism, and plant-pathogen interaction.^2,3 A number of these metabolic functions, such as photorespiration, fatty acid metabolism and jasmonic acid biosynthesis, are accomplished through the cooperative efforts of peroxisomes and other subcellular compartments, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts.^3–5 The function, morphology and abundance of peroxisomes can vary depending on the organism, cell type, developmental stage and prevailing environmental conditions in which the organism resides.^6,7 It is now believed that in addition to budding from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), peroxisomes also multiply from pre-existing peroxisomes via division, going through steps including peroxisome elongation/tubulation, membrane constriction and fission.^7,8In the reference plant Arabidopsis thaliana, three evolutionarily conserved families of proteins have been identified as key components of the peroxisome division apparatus. Five integral membrane proteins, named PEX11a to -e, are mainly responsible for inducing the elongation and tubulation of peroxisomes in the early stage of peroxisome division.^9–11 DRP3A and DRP3B are members of a dynamin-related protein family that powers the fission of membranes and FIS1A and FIS1B are homologous proteins believed to anchor the DRP proteins to the membrane.^12–19 Similar to their counterparts in yeasts and mammals, DRP3 and FIS1 are shared by the fission machineries of peroxisomes and mitochondria.^12–19 We recently reported the unexpected finding that DRP5B, a plant/algal-specific DRP distantly related to the DRP3 proteins and originally discovered for its function in chloroplast division, is also involved in the division of peroxisomes. Using co-immunoprecipitation (co-IP) and bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) assays, we further demonstrated that DRP5B and the two DRP3 proteins can homo- and hetero-dimerize and each DRP can form a complex with FIS1A and/or FIS1B and most of the Arabidopsis PEX11 isoforms.²⁰ These results together demonstrate that, despite their distinct evolutionary origins, structures and functions, peroxisomes, mitochondria and chloroplasts use some of the same factors for fission. These data also revealed that, like in yeasts and mammals, the FIS1-DRP complex exits on peroxisomes and mitochondria in plants.DRP5B, a DRP unique in the plant and photosynthetic algae lineages, seems to be the sole component shared by the division of chloroplasts and peroxisomes.²⁰ However, both FIS1 and DRP are found to be required for the division of peroxisomes and mitochondria throughout eukaryotic evolution,^21,22 prompting the question: to what extent is the FIS1-DRP complex conserved among diverse species? In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, this fission complex also contains an adaptor encoded by two homologous WD40 proteins, Mdv1 and Caf4, which are partially redundant in function with Mdv1 playing the major role. Mdv1 and Caf4 share an N-terminal extension (NTE) domain with two α-helices, a middle coiled-coil domain (CC) and C-terminal WD40 repeat. Both proteins use the NTE to interact with the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) domain-containing N-terminus of Fis1, the CC domain to dimerize and the C-terminal WD40 repeat to interact with and recruit the DRP protein, Dnm1.^23,24 The Hansenula polymorpha Mdv1 (Hp Mdv1) also has a dual function in the division of peroxisomes and mitochondria.²⁵ In addition, a Mdv1/Caf4 homolog, Mda1, was identified from the primitive red algae Cyanidioschyzon merolae and found to be involved at least in mitochondrial fission.²⁶ However, higher eukaryotes do not seem to have obvious homologs of Mdv1/Caf4. For example, mammals contain Fis1 and Drp (called DLP1 or Drp1) but no apparent homologs to Mdv1 and Caf4. Instead, a metazoan-specific tail-anchored protein, Mitochondrial Fission Factor (Mff), was recently found to regulate the fission of mitochondria and peroxisomes in a similar manner to Fis1. Mff is essential in recruiting Drp1, at least in mitochondrial division, yet it functions in a Fis1-independent pathway.^27,28To determine whether plants contain structural or functional homologs of Mdv1 and Caf4, we performed blast searches of the Arabidopsis genome, which resulted in the retrieval of ∼300 WD40 proteins. However, just like the search results from mammals, none of these proteins show significant sequence similarity with Mdv1 and Caf4 beyond the WD40 repeats. To identify proteins with similar domain structures with Mdv1/Caf4, we further analyzed these WD40 proteins, using the online Simple Modular Architecture Research Tool (smart.embl-heidelberg.de/). After eliminating proteins apparently inappropriate to be part of this complex, such as kinases and proteins with drastically distinct domain organizations despite of having both WD40 repeats and CC domains, we were able to narrow down to eight proteins. These proteins, which are encoded by At1g04510, At2g32950, At2g33340, At3g18860, At4g05410, At4g21130, At5g50230 and At5g67320, respectively, each contain a central CC domain in addition to the WD40 repeat region and are ranging from 450 to 900 amino acids in length (Fig. 1A). Subcellular localization studies will need to be performed to determine whether some of these proteins are associated with peroxisomes and mitochondria. If such a WD40 protein is proven to be part of the FIS1-DRP complex in Arabidopsis, it will be important to determine whether it simply acts as an adaptor or it also plays other roles, such as to promote and maintain the active structure and conformation of DRP3A/3B at the division site (Fig. 1B). Consistent with the latter scenario, it was found that Sc Mdv1 accumulates at the division sites after Dnm1 assembles and that the mammalian Fis1 and Drp1 proteins physically interact.^29,30 Peroxisomes and mitochondria are functionally linked in a number of metabolic pathways. For example, in plants, they act cooperatively in important processes such as fatty acid metabolism and photorespiration.³ An interesting question to address in the future is whether sharing such a conserved fission machine between peroxisomes and mitochondria throughout evolution has critical biological consequences.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Domain structure of Mdv1/Caf4 and their homologs or putative homologs. (A) Domain structure of Sc Mdv1 and Sc Caf4 from S. cerevisiae, their homologs from H. polymorpha and C. merolae, and the eight Arabidopsis proteins with similar domain organization. Grey boxes indicate the CC domain and black boxes are Wd40 repeats. (B) The putative FIS1-WD40-DRP complex in Arabidopsis. CC, coiled-coil; NTE, N-terminal extension; TPR, tetratricopeptide repeat; TMD, transmembrane domain.     

Differential Roles of Arabidopsis Dynamin-Related Proteins DRP3A,DRP3B,and DRP5B in Organelle Division

Dynamin-related proteins (DRPs) are key components of the organelle division machineries, functioning as molecular scissors during the fission process. In Arabidopsis, DRP3A and DRP3B are shared by peroxisomal and mitochondrial division, whereas the structurally-distinct DRP5B (ARC5) protein is involved in the division of chloroplasts and peroxisomes. Here, we further investigated the roles of DRP3A, DRP3B, and DRP5B in organelle division and plant development. Despite DRP5B's lack of stable association with mitochondria, drp5B mutants show defects in mitochondrial division. The drp3A-2 drp3B-2 drp5B-2 triple mutant exhibits enhanced mitochondrial division phenotypes over drp3A-2 drp3B-2, but its peroxisomal morphology and plant growth phenotypes resemble those of the double mutant. We further demonstrated that DRP3A and DRP3B form a supercomplex in vivo, in which DRP3A is the major component, yet DRP5B is not a constituent of this complex. We thus conclude that DRP5B participates in the division of three types of organelles in Arabidopsis, acting independently of the DRP3 complex. Our findings will help elucidate the precise composition of the DRP3 complex at organelle division sites, and will be instrumental to studies aimed at understanding how the same protein mediates the morphogenesis of distinct organelles that are linked by metabolism.     

The Arabidopsis tail-anchored protein PEROXISOMAL AND MITOCHONDRIAL DIVISION FACTOR1 is involved in the morphogenesis and proliferation of peroxisomes and mitochondria

Peroxisomes and mitochondria are multifunctional eukaryotic organelles that are not only interconnected metabolically but also share proteins in division. Two evolutionarily conserved division factors, dynamin-related protein (DRP) and its organelle anchor FISSION1 (FIS1), mediate the fission of both peroxisomes and mitochondria. Here, we identified and characterized a plant-specific protein shared by these two types of organelles. The Arabidopsis thaliana PEROXISOMAL and MITOCHONDRIAL DIVISION FACTOR1 (PMD1) is a coiled-coil protein tethered to the membranes of peroxisomes and mitochondria by its C terminus. Null mutants of PMD1 contain enlarged peroxisomes and elongated mitochondria, and plants overexpressing PMD1 have an increased number of these organelles that are smaller in size and often aggregated. PMD1 lacks physical interaction with the known division proteins DRP3 and FIS1; it is also not required for DRP3's organelle targeting. Affinity purifications pulled down PMD1's homolog, PMD2, which exclusively targets to mitochondria and plays a specific role in mitochondrial morphogenesis. PMD1 and PMD2 can form homo- and heterocomplexes. Organelle targeting signals reside in the C termini of these proteins. Our results suggest that PMD1 facilitates peroxisomal and mitochondrial proliferation in a FIS1/DRP3-independent manner and that the homologous proteins PMD1 and PMD2 perform nonredundant functions in organelle morphogenesis.     

The Arabidopsis peroxisome division mutant pdd2 is defective in the DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN3A (DRP3A) gene

In plants, the division of peroxisomes is mediated by several classes of proteins, including PEROXIN11 (PEX11), FISSION1 (FIS1) and DYNAMIN-RELATED PROTEIN3 (DRP3). DRP3A and DRP3B are two homologous dynamin-related proteins playing overlapping roles in the division of both peroxisomes and mitochondria, with DRP3A performing a stronger function than DRP3B in peroxisomal fission. Here, we report the identification and characterization of the peroxisome division defective 2 (pdd2) mutant, which was later proven to be another drp3A allele. The pdd2 mutant generates a truncated DRP3A protein and exhibits pale green and retarded growth phenotypes. Intriguingly, this mutant displays much stronger peroxisome division deficiency in root cells than in leaf mesophyll cells. Our data suggest that the partial GTPase effector domain retained in pdd2 may have contributed to the distinct mutant phenotype of this mutant.Key words: peroxisome division, dynamin-related protein, arabidopsisIn eukaryotic cells, peroxisomes are surrounded by single membranes and house a variety of oxidative metabolic pathways such as lipid metabolism, detoxification and plant photorespiration.^1,2 To accomplish multiple tasks, the morphology, abundance and positioning of peroxisomes need to be highly regulated. Three families of proteins, whose homologs are present across different kingdoms, have been shown to be involved in peroxisome division in Arabidopsis. The PEX11 protein family is composed of five integral membrane proteins with primary roles in peroxisome elongation/tubulation, the initial step in peroxisome division.^3–5 Although the exact function of PEX11s has not been demonstrated, these proteins are believed to participate in peroxisome membrane modification.^6,7 The FIS1 family consists of two isoforms, which are C-terminal tail-anchored membrane proteins with rate limiting functions at the fission step.^8,9 DRP3A and DRP3B belong to a superfamily of dynamin-related proteins, which are large and self-assembling GTPases involved in the fission and fusion of membranes by acting as mechanochemical enzymes or signaling GTPases.¹⁰ The function of PEX11 seems to be exclusive to peroxisomes, whereas DRP3 and FIS1 are shared by the division machineries of both peroxisomes and mitochondria in Arabidopsis.^8,9,11–16 FIS1 proteins are believed to tether DRP proteins to the peroxisomal membrane,^17,18 but direct evidence has not been obtained from plants. DRP3A and DRP3B share 77% sequence identity at the protein level and are functionally redundant in regulating mitochondrial division; however, DRP3A''s role on the peroxisome seems stronger and cannot be substituted by DRP3B in peroxisome division.^8,13,15In a continuous effort to identify components of the plant peroxisome division apparatus from Arabidopsis, we performed genetic screens in a peroxisomal marker background expressing the YFP (yellow fluorescent protein)-PTS1 (peroxisome targeting signal 1, containing Ser-Lys-Leu) fusion protein. Mutants with defects in the morphology and abundance of fluorescently labeled peroxisomes are characterized. Following our analysis of the pdd1 mutant, which turned out to be a strong allele of DRP3A,⁸ we characterized the pdd2 mutant.In root cells of the pdd2 mutant, extremely elongated peroxisomes and a beads-on-a-string peroxisomal phenotype are frequently observed (Fig. 1A and B). These peroxisome phenotypes resemble those of pdd1 and other strong drp3A alleles previously reported.^8,15 However, the peroxisome phenotype seems to be less dramatic in leaf mesophyll cells. For instance, in addition to the decreased number of total peroxisomes, peroxisomes in leaf cells are only slightly elongated or exhibit a beads-on-a-string phenotype (Fig. 1C and D). Previously, we reported the phenotypes of three strong drp3A alleles, all of which contain a large number of peroxules, long and thin membrane extensions from the peroxisome,⁸ yet such peroxisomal structures are not observed in pdd2. On the other hand, pdd2 has a more severe growth phenotype than most drp3A alleles, as it is slow in growth and has pale green leaves (Fig. 1E). Genetic analysis showed that pdd2 segregates as a single recessive mutation (data not shown).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Phenotypic analyses of pdd2 and identification of the PDD2 gene. (A–D) Confocal micrographs of root and mesophyll cells in 3-week-old wild type and pdd2 mutant plants. Green signals show peroxisomes; red signals show chloroplasts. Scale bars = 20 µm. (E) Growth phenotype of 3-week-old mutants. (F) Map-based cloning of the PDD2 gene. Genetic distance from PDD2 is shown under each molecular marker. Positions for mutations in previously analyzed drp3A alleles and pdd2 are indicated in the gene schematic. drp3A-1 and drp3A-2 are T-DNA insertion mutants, whereas pdd1 is an EMS mutant containing a premature stop codon in exon 6. (G) A schematic of the DRP3A (PDD2) protein with functional domains indicated. The pdd2 allele encodes a truncated protein lacking part of the GED domain.The unique combination of peroxisomal and growth phenotypes of pdd2 prompted us to use map-based cloning to identify the PDD2 gene, with the hope to discover novel proteins in the peroxisome division machinery. A population of approximately 6,000 F₂ plants (pdd2 × Ler) was generated. After screening 755 F₂ mutants, the pdd2 mutation was mapped to the region between markers T10C21 and F4B14 on the long arm of chromosome 4 (Fig. 1F). Since this region contains DRP3A, we sequenced the entire DRP3A gene in pdd2 and identified a G→A transition at the junction of the 18^th exon and intron (Fig. 1F). Further analysis revealed that the point mutation at this junction caused mis-splicing of intron 18, introducing a stop codon in the GTPase effector domain GED near the C terminus (Fig. 1G).DRPs share with the classic dynamins an N-terminal GTPase domain, a middle domain (MD), and a regulatory motif named the GTPase effector domain (GED) (Fig. 1G). To date, a total of 26 drp3A mutant alleles carrying missense or nonsense mutations along the length of the DRP3A gene have been isolated.^8,15 The combined peroxisomal and growth phenotype of pdd2 and the nature of the mutation in this allele are unique among all the drp3A alleles, indicating that the partial GED domain retained in pdd2 may have created some novel function for this protein. Further analysis of the truncated protein may be necessary to test this prediction.     

Plant Peroxisome Multiplication： Highly Regulatec and Still Enigmatic

Plant peroxisomes play a key role in numerous physiological processes and are able to adapt to environmental changes by altering their content, morphology, and abundance. Peroxisomes can multiply through elongation, constriction, and fission; this process requires the action of conserved, as well as species-specific proteins. Genetic and morphological analyses have been used with the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana to determine at the mechanistic level how plant peroxisomes increase their abundance. The five-member PEXll family promotes early steps of peroxisome multiplication with an unknown mechanism and some subfamily specificities. The dynamin-related protein （DRP）3 subfamily of dynaminrelated large guanosine triphosphatases mediates late steps of both peroxisomal and mitochondrial multiplication. New genetic and biochemical tools will be needed to identify additional, especially plant-specific, constituents of the peroxisome multiplication pathways.     

The dynamin-like GTPase DLP1 is essential for peroxisome division and is recruited to peroxisomes in part by PEX11

Peroxisome division involves the conserved PEX11 peroxisomal membrane proteins and in yeast has been shown to require Vps1p, a dynamin-like protein. We show here that DLP1, the human homolog of the yeast DNM1 and VPS1 genes, plays an important role in peroxisome division in human cells. Disruption of DLP1 function by either RNA interference or overexpressing dominant negative DLP1 mutants causes a dramatic reduction in peroxisome abundance, although overexpression of functional DLP1 has no effect on peroxisome abundance. Overexpression of PEX11 induces peroxisome division in a multistep process involving elongation of preexisting peroxisomes followed by their division. We find that DLP1 is dispensable for the first phase of this process but essential for the second. Furthermore, we show that DLP1 associates with peroxisomes and that PEX11 overexpression recruits DLP1 to peroxisome membranes. However, we were unable to detect physical interaction between PEX11 and DLP1, and the stoichiometry of PEX11 and peroxisome-associated DLP1 was far less than 1:1. Based on these and other aspects, we propose that DLP1 performs an essential but transient role in peroxisome division and that PEX11 promotes peroxisome division by recruiting DLP1 to peroxisome membranes through an indirect mechanism.     

Arabidopsis dynamin-related proteins DRP3A and DRP3B are functionally redundant in mitochondrial fission, but have distinct roles in peroxisomal fission

Two similar Arabidopsis dynamin-related proteins, DRP3A and DRP3B, are thought to be key factors in both mitochondrial and peroxisomal fission. However, the functional and genetic relationships between DRP3A and DRP3B have not been fully investigated. In a yeast two-hybrid assay, DRP3A and DRP3B interacted with themselves and with each other. DRP3A and DRP3B localized to mitochondria and peroxisomes, and co-localized with each other in leaf epidermal cells. In two T-DNA insertion mutants, drp3a and drp3b , the mitochondria are a little longer and fewer in number than those in the wild-type cells. In the double mutant, drp3a/drp3b , mitochondria are connected to each other, resulting in massive elongation. Overexpression of either DRP3A or DRP3B in drp3a/drp3b restored the particle shape of mitochondria, suggesting that DRP3A and DRP3B are functionally redundant in mitochondrial fission. In the case of peroxisomal fission, DRP3A and DRP3B appear to have different functions: peroxisomes in drp3a were larger and fewer in number than those in the wild type, whereas peroxisomes in drp3b were as large and as numerous as those in the wild type, and peroxisomes in drp3a/drp3b were as large and as numerous as those in drp3a . Although overexpression of DRP3A in drp3a/drp3b restored the shape and number of peroxisomes, overexpression of DRP3B did not restore the phenotypes, and often caused elongation instead. These results suggest that DRP3B and DRP3A have redundant molecular functions in mitochondrial fission, whereas DRP3B has a minor role in peroxisomal fission that is distinct from that of DRP3A.     

The ides of MARCH5: The E3 ligase essential for peroxisome degradation by pexophagy

A recent study by Zheng et al. (2021. J. Cell Biol. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.202103156) identifies the ubiquitin-protein ligase (E3) MARCH5 as a dual-organelle localized protein that not only targets to mitochondria but also to peroxisomes in a PEX19-mediated manner. Moreover, the authors demonstrate that the Torin1-dependent induction of pexophagy is executed by the MARCH5-catalyzed ubiquitination of the peroxisomal membrane protein PMP70.

Recent research has begun to slowly elucidate the complex processes that underlie selective autophagic degradation of mammalian peroxisomes. The study by Zheng et al. (1) sheds a light on the mechanism underlying pexophagy, which is induced by mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) inactivation (2). The ubiquitously conserved serine/threonine kinase mTOR has a central function in integrating diverse growth signals and orchestrating their physiological effect on a cellular level, while blocking cell growth–restricting mechanisms like the different autophagy pathways (3). Previous work has demonstrated that amino acid starvation could induce mTOR inhibition-dependent peroxisome degradation by up-regulating the activity of the peroxisomal protein ubiquitin (E3) ligase PEX2 (4), which was especially of interest as PEX2 is also required for peroxisomal matrix protein import during the formation of the organelle (5). However, while these data suggested that the dual function of PEX2 might mark it as a point of convergence for the balance of peroxisome formation and degradation, the Zheng et al. study has identified a role for the E3 ligase MARCH5 (membrane-associated RING-CH 5; 1) that aims at a different aspect of peroxisome biology.Zheng et al. identified the peroxisomal proteins PEX3, PEX19, and PMP70 as close interaction partners of MARCH5 (1). The authors could demonstrate a PEX19-dependent localization of a portion of the MARCH5 population to peroxisomes. Here, MARCH5 can bind and polyubiquitinate the abundant peroxisomal membrane protein PMP70. While it is clear that the increased level of polyubiquitinated PMP70 molecules marks peroxisomes for recognition by ubiquitin-binding autophagy receptors that link the target organelle to the autophagosomal membrane, the identity of the E2 enzyme involved in ubiquitin chain generation as well as the ubiquitin adaptors are unknown (Fig. 1). However, based on published research, NBR1 or p62 are good candidates for the adaptors that engage the autophagy machinery (2). Moreover, the Zheng et al. study demonstrates that MARCH5-mediated polyubiquitination of PMP70 is induced by the mTOR inhibitor Torin1. In return, the described Torin1-induced pexophagy was shown to rely on the peroxisomal localization and activity of the catalytic RING domain of MARCH5 (1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.The small molecule Torin1 can inhibit the kinase mTOR, resulting in a relief of the mTOR-dependent block of MARCH5 targeting to peroxisomes. MARCH5 is inserted into the peroxisomal membrane in a PEX19- and PEX3-dependent manner. MARCH5 ubiquitinates the abundant peroxisomal membrane protein PMP70 with the help of an unknown ubiquitin (Ub)-conjugating enzyme (E2). The ubiquitinated PMP70 molecules are recognized by ubiquitin-binding autophagy receptors, like NBR1 or p62, that link the organelle to the autophagosome, resulting in the autophagic degradation of the peroxisome via pexophagy.It is interesting to note that the opponent of pexophagy-linked ubiquitin signals on peroxisomes was already identified as the deubiquitinating enzyme USP30 (6). This combination is even more relevant when considering that MARCH5 and USP30 were described as an antagonizing enzyme pair that regulates the autophagic degradation of mitochondria via mitophagy (6). The function of MARCH5 is also linked to other mitochondrial ubiquitination factors, like the E3 ligase Parkin. While both enzymes can contribute to mitophagy induction by ubiquitinating proteins of the outer mitochondrial membrane, they can also modify each other. MARCH5 ubiquitinates Parkin in order to restrict the number of Parkin molecules during mitophagy and to prevent Parkin-mediated cell death (7).After mitophagy induction, Parkin can ubiquitinate MARCH5, which results in the p97-mediated membrane extraction of MARCH5 and a PEX3/PEX16-dependent redistribution of MARCH5 to peroxisomes (8). This mechanism was assumed to rescue MARCH5 from degradation by mitophagy. It will be important to elucidate if there is mechanistic overlap between the Parkin-mediated (8) and the Torin1-dependent (1) targeting of MARCH5. Moreover, it will be interesting to determine if MARCH5 is also engaged in an interplay with the peroxisomal E3 ligases PEX2, PEX10, PEX12, or TRIM37.Mitochondria and peroxisomes share basic components of their fission machineries. Both organelles use the membrane proteins FIS1 and mitochondrial fission factor for the targeting of the membrane-constricting GTPase DRP1 (DLP1; 9). In the case of the mitochondria, MARCH5 can ubiquitinate DRP1 and FIS1 for proteasomal degradation in order to limit mitochondrial However, other data indicate the existence of a feedback mechanism, as DRP1 can also negatively influence MARCH5 activity. In addition, MARCH5 not only limits mitochondrial fission, but also represents a basic requirement for this process. This complex relationship of MARCH5 with mitochondrial fission proteins suggests that it performs a central role in the fine-tuning of the basic regulatory aspects of mitochondrial division (10). Therefore, future studies might not only establish a potential role of MARCH5 in peroxisomal fission but might also uncover aspects that could enable further insights into the related process in mitochondria.The different roles of MARCH5 in organelle fission and autophagic degradation could possibly be interconnected in one bipartite reaction sequence. Mitochondrial fission is crucial for mitophagy and enables the removal of damaged sections of mitochondria or the limitation of organelle size for a more efficient engulfment by autophagosomal membranes (11). Therefore, both processes can be functionally interconnected. Interestingly, it has been shown that fission also precedes pexophagy in yeast cells (12), which are thought to use organelle-specific adaptors instead of ubiquitin as a degradation tag. However, these observations suggest that MARCH5 might coordinate peroxisomal fission with pexophagy even in mammalian peroxisomes.In summary, the Zheng et al. study not only identifies a central mechanistic module required for the turnover of mammalian peroxisomes (1) but also raises many interesting questions that will result in further studies dealing with the interplay of the peroxisomal ubiquitination factors, the crosstalk between mitochondria and peroxisomes, and the organization and regulation of the peroxisomal fission machinery as well as the convergence of peroxisomal fission and pexophagy pathways.     

An Arabidopsis dynamin-related protein, DRP3A, controls both peroxisomal and mitochondrial division

Peroxisomes undergo dramatic changes in size, shape, number, and position within the cell, but the division process of peroxisomes has not been characterized. We screened a number of Arabidopsis mutants with aberrant peroxisome morphology (apm mutants). In one of these mutants, apm1, the peroxisomes are long and reduced in number, apparently as a result of inhibition of division. We showed that APM1 encodes dynamin-related protein 3A (DRP3A), and that mutations in APM1/DRP3A also caused aberrant morphology of mitochondria. The transient expression analysis showed that DRP3A is associated with the cytosolic side of peroxisomes. These findings indicate that the same dynamin molecule is involved in peroxisomal and mitochondrial division in higher plants. We also report that the growth of Arabidopsis, which requires the cooperation of various organelles, including peroxisomes and mitochondria, is repressed in apm1, indicating that the changes of morphology of peroxisomes and mitochondria reduce the efficiency of metabolism in these organelles.     

A defect of peroxisomal membrane protein 38 causes enlargement of peroxisomes

Peroxisome proliferation occurs through enlargement, elongation and division of pre-existing peroxisomes. In the Arabidopsis apem mutant, apem3, peroxisomes are dramatically enlarged and reduced in number, revealing a defect in peroxisome proliferation. The APEM3 gene was found to encode peroxisomal membrane protein 38 (PMP38). To examine the relative role of PMP38 during proliferation, a double mutant was constructed consisting of apem3 and the peroxisome division mutant, apem1, in which a defect in dynamin-related protein 3A (DRP3A) results in elongation of peroxisomes. In the double mutant, almost all peroxisomes were predominantly enlarged but not elongated. DRP3A is still able to localize at the peroxisomal membrane on enlarged peroxisomes in the apem3 mutants. PMP38 is revealed to be capable of interacting with itself, but not with DRP3A. These results indicate that PMP38 has a role at a different step that requires APEM1/DRP3A. PMP38 is expressed in various tissues throughout the plant, indicating that PMP38 may participate in multiple unidentified functions in these tissues. PMP38 belongs to a mitochondrial carrier family (MCF) protein. However, unlike Arabidopsis nucleotide carrier protein 1 (AtPNC1) and AtPNC2, two other peroxisome-resident MCF proteins that function as adenine nucleotide transporters, PMP38 has no ATP or ADP transport activity. In addition, unlike AtPNC1 and AtPNC2 knock-down plants, apem3 mutants do not exhibit any gross morphological abnormalities. These results demonstrate that APEM3/PMP38 plays a role distinct from that of AtPNC1 and AtPNC2. We discuss possible mechanism of enlargement of peroxisomes in the apem3 mutants.     

Peroxisome proliferation in Hansenula polymorpha requires Dnm1p which mediates fission but not de novo formation

We show that the dynamin-like proteins Dnm1p and Vps1p are not required for re-introduction of peroxisomes in Hansenula polymorpha pex3 cells upon complementation with PEX3-GFP. Instead, Dnm1p, but not Vps1p, plays a crucial role in organelle proliferation via fission. In H. polymorpha DNM1 deletion cells (dnm1) a single peroxisome is present that forms long extensions, which protrude into developing buds and divide during cytokinesis. Budding pex11.dnm1 double deletion cells lack these peroxisomal extensions, suggesting that the peroxisomal membrane protein Pex11p is required for their formation. Life cell imaging revealed that fluorescent Dnm1p-GFP spots fluctuate between peroxisomes and mitochondria. On the other hand Pex11p is present over the entire organelle surface, but concentrates during fission at the basis of the organelle extension in dnm1 cells.Our data indicate that peroxisome fission is the major pathway for peroxisome multiplication in H. polymorpha.     

Peroxisome reintroduction in Hansenula polymorpha requires Pex25 and Rho1

We identified two proteins, Pex25 and Rho1, which are involved in reintroduction of peroxisomes in peroxisome-deficient yeast cells. These are, together with Pex3, the first proteins identified as essential for this process. Of the three members of the Hansenula polymorpha Pex11 protein family-Pex11, Pex25, and Pex11C-only Pex25 was required for reintroduction of peroxisomes into a peroxisome-deficient mutant strain. In peroxisome-deficient pex3 cells, Pex25 localized to structures adjacent to the ER, whereas in wild-type cells it localized to peroxisomes. Pex25 cells were not themselves peroxisome deficient but instead contained a slightly increased number of peroxisomes. Interestingly, pex11 pex25 double deletion cells, in which both peroxisome fission (due to the deletion of PEX11) and reintroduction (due to deletion of PEX25) was blocked, did display a peroxisome-deficient phenotype. Peroxisomes reappeared in pex11 pex25 cells upon synthesis of Pex25, but not of Pex11. Reintroduction in the presence of Pex25 required the function of the GTPase Rho1. These data therefore provide new and detailed insight into factors important for de novo peroxisome formation in yeast.     

The control of peroxisome number and size during division and proliferation

Like other subcellular organelles, peroxisomes divide and segregate to daughter cells during cell division, but this organelle can also proliferate or be degraded in response to environmental cues. Although the mechanisms and genes involved in these processes are still under active investigation, an important player in peroxisome proliferation is a dynamin-related protein (DRP) that is recruited to the organelle membrane by a DRP receptor. Related DRPs also function in the division of mitochondria and chloroplasts. Many other proteins and signals regulate peroxisome division and proliferation, but their modes of action are still being studied.     

Pex3p initiates the formation of a preperoxisomal compartment from a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Peroxisomes are dynamic organelles that often proliferate in response to compounds that they metabolize. Peroxisomes can proliferate by two apparent mechanisms, division of preexisting peroxisomes and de novo synthesis of peroxisomes. Evidence for de novo peroxisome synthesis comes from studies of cells lacking the peroxisomal integral membrane peroxin Pex3p. These cells lack peroxisomes, but peroxisomes can assemble upon reintroduction of Pex3p. The source of these peroxisomes has been the subject of debate. Here, we show that the amino-terminal 46 amino acids of Pex3p of Saccharomyces cerevisiae target to a subdomain of the endoplasmic reticulum and initiate the formation of a preperoxisomal compartment for de novo peroxisome synthesis. In vivo video microscopy showed that this preperoxisomal compartment can import both peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins leading to the formation of bona fide peroxisomes through the continued activity of full-length Pex3p. Peroxisome formation from the preperoxisomal compartment depends on the activity of the genes PEX14 and PEX19, which are required for the targeting of peroxisomal matrix and membrane proteins, respectively. Our findings support a direct role for the endoplasmic reticulum in de novo peroxisome formation.     

The PEROXIN11 protein family controls peroxisome proliferation in Arabidopsis

PEROXIN11 (PEX11) is a peroxisomal membrane protein in fungi and mammals and was proposed to play a major role in peroxisome proliferation. To begin understanding how peroxisomes proliferate in plants and how changes in peroxisome abundance affect plant development, we characterized the extended Arabidopsis thaliana PEX11 protein family, consisting of the three phylogenetically distinct subfamilies PEX11a, PEX11b, and PEX11c to PEX11e. All five Arabidopsis PEX11 proteins target to peroxisomes, as demonstrated for endogenous and cyan fluorescent protein fusion proteins by fluorescence microscopy and immunobiochemical analysis using highly purified leaf peroxisomes. PEX11a and PEX11c to PEX11e behave as integral proteins of the peroxisome membrane. Overexpression of At PEX11 genes in Arabidopsis induced peroxisome proliferation, whereas reduction in gene expression decreased peroxisome abundance. PEX11c and PEX11e, but not PEX11a, PEX11b, and PEX11d, complemented to significant degrees the growth phenotype of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae pex11 null mutant on oleic acid. Heterologous expression of PEX11e in the yeast mutant increased the number and reduced the size of the peroxisomes. We conclude that all five Arabidopsis PEX11 proteins promote peroxisome proliferation and that individual family members play specific roles in distinct peroxisomal subtypes and environmental conditions and possibly in different steps of peroxisome proliferation.     

The E3 ubiquitin ligase SP1‐like 1 plays a positive role in peroxisome biogenesis in Arabidopsis

Peroxisomes are dynamic organelles crucial for a variety of metabolic processes during the development of eukaryotic organisms, and are functionally linked to other subcellular organelles, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts. Peroxisomal matrix proteins are imported by peroxins (PEX proteins), yet the modulation of peroxin functions is poorly understood. We previously reported that, besides its known function in chloroplast protein import, the Arabidopsis E3 ubiquitin ligase SP1 (suppressor of ppi1 locus1) also targets to peroxisomes and mitochondria, and promotes the destabilization of the peroxisomal receptor–cargo docking complex components PEX13 and PEX14. Here we present evidence that in Arabidopsis, SP1's closest homolog SP1‐like 1 (SPL1) plays an opposite role to SP1 in peroxisomes. In contrast to sp1, loss‐of‐function of SPL1 led to reduced peroxisomal β‐oxidation activity, and enhanced the physiological and growth defects of pex14 and pex13 mutants. Transient co‐expression of SPL1 and SP1 promoted each other's destabilization. SPL1 reduced the ability of SP1 to induce PEX13 turnover, and it is the N‐terminus of SP1 and SPL1 that determines whether the protein is able to promote PEX13 turnover. Finally, SPL1 showed prevalent targeting to mitochondria, but rather weak and partial localization to peroxisomes. Our data suggest that these two members of the same E3 protein family utilize distinct mechanisms to modulate peroxisome biogenesis, where SPL1 reduces the function of SP1. Plants and possibly other higher eukaryotes may employ this small family of E3 enzymes to differentially modulate the dynamics of several organelles essential to energy metabolism via the ubiquitin‐proteasome system.