Intermolecular base-paired interaction between complementary sequences present near the 3'' ends of 5S rRNA and 18S (16S) rRNA might be involved in the reversible association of ribosomal subunits.

Highly conserved sequences present at an identical position near the 3' ends of eukaryotic and prokaryotic 5S rRNAs are complementary to the 5' strand of the m2(6)A hairpin structure near the 3' ends of 18S rRNA and 16S rRNA, respectively. The extent of base-pairing and the calculated stabilities of the hybrids that can be constructed between 5S rRNAs and the small ribosomal subunit RNAs are greater than most, if not all, RNA-RNA interactions that have been implicated in protein synthesis. The existence of complementary sequences in 5S rRNA and small ribosomal subunit RNA, along with the previous observation that there is very efficient and selective hybridization in vitro between 5S and 18S rRNA, suggests that base-pairing between 5S rRNA in the large ribosomal subunit and 18S (16S) rRNA in the small ribosomal subunit might be involved in the reversible association of ribosomal subunits. Structural and functional evidence supporting this hypothesis is discussed.     

Functional dichotomy of ribosomal proteins during the synthesis of mammalian 40S ribosomal subunits

Our knowledge of the functions of metazoan ribosomal proteins in ribosome synthesis remains fragmentary. Using siRNAs, we show that knockdown of 31 of the 32 ribosomal proteins of the human 40S subunit (ribosomal protein of the small subunit [RPS]) strongly affects pre–ribosomal RNA (rRNA) processing, which often correlates with nucleolar chromatin disorganization. 16 RPSs are strictly required for initiating processing of the sequences flanking the 18S rRNA in the pre-rRNA except at the metazoan-specific early cleavage site. The remaining 16 proteins are necessary for progression of the nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation steps and for nuclear export. Distribution of these two subsets of RPSs in the 40S subunit structure argues for a tight dependence of pre-rRNA processing initiation on the folding of both the body and the head of the forming subunit. Interestingly, the functional dichotomy of RPS proteins reported in this study is correlated with the mutation frequency of RPS genes in Diamond-Blackfan anemia.     

Interaction of ribosomal proteins S5, S6, S11, S12, S18 and S21 with 16 S rRNA

We have examined the effects of assembly of ribosomal proteins S5, S6, S11, S12, S18 and S21 on the reactivities of residues in 16 S rRNA towards chemical probes. The results show that S6, S18 and S11 interact with the 690-720 and 790 loop regions of 16 S rRNA in a highly co-operative manner, that is consistent with the previously defined assembly map relationships among these proteins. The results also indicate that these proteins, one of which (S18) has previously been implicated as a component of the ribosomal P-site, interact with residues near some of the recently defined P-site (class II tRNA protection) nucleotides in 16 S rRNA. In addition, assembly of protein S12 has been found to result in the protection of residues in both the 530 stem/loop and the 900 stem regions; the latter group is closely juxtaposed to a segment of 16 S rRNA recently shown to be protected from chemical probes by streptomycin. Interestingly, both S5 and S12 appear to protect, to differing degrees, a well-defined set of residues in the 900 stem/loop and 5'-terminal regions. These observations are discussed in terms of the effects of S5 and S12 on streptomycin binding, and in terms of the class III tRNA protection found in the 900 stem of 16 S rRNA. Altogether these results show that many of the small subunit proteins, which have previously been shown to be functionally important, appear to be associated with functionally implicated segments of 16 S rRNA.     

Functional genetic selection of Helix 66 in Escherichia coli 23S rRNA identified the eukaryotic-binding sequence for ribosomal protein L2

Ribosomal protein L2 is a highly conserved primary 23S rRNA-binding protein. L2 specifically recognizes the internal bulge sequence in Helix 66 (H66) of 23S rRNA and is localized to the intersubunit space through formation of bridge B7b with 16S rRNA. The L2-binding site in H66 is highly conserved in prokaryotic ribosomes, whereas the corresponding site in eukaryotic ribosomes has evolved into distinct classes of sequences. We performed a systematic genetic selection of randomized rRNA sequences in Escherichia coli, and isolated 20 functional variants of the L2-binding site. The isolated variants consisted of eukaryotic sequences, in addition to prokaryotic sequences. These results suggest that L2/L8e does not recognize a specific base sequence of H66, but rather a characteristic architecture of H66. The growth phenotype of the isolated variants correlated well with their ability of subunit association. Upon continuous cultivation of a deleterious variant, we isolated two spontaneous mutations within domain IV of 23S rRNA that compensated for its weak subunit association, and alleviated its growth defect, implying that functional interactions between intersubunit bridges compensate ribosomal function.     

Assembly of the central domain of the 30S ribosomal subunit: roles for the primary binding ribosomal proteins S15 and S8

Assembly of the 30S ribosomal subunit occurs in a highly ordered and sequential manner. The ordered addition of ribosomal proteins to the growing ribonucleoprotein particle is initiated by the association of primary binding proteins. These proteins bind specifically and independently to 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA). Two primary binding proteins, S8 and S15, interact exclusively with the central domain of 16S rRNA. Binding of S15 to the central domain results in a conformational change in the RNA and is followed by the ordered assembly of the S6/S18 dimer, S11 and finally S21 to form the platform of the 30S subunit. In contrast, S8 is not part of this major platform assembly branch. Of the remaining central domain binding proteins, only S21 association is slightly dependent on S8. Thus, although S8 is a primary binding protein that extensively contacts the central domain, its role in assembly of this domain remains unclear. Here, we used directed hydroxyl radical probing from four unique positions on S15 to assess organization of the central domain of 16S rRNA as a consequence of S8 association. Hydroxyl radical probing of Fe(II)-S15/16S rRNA and Fe(II)-S15/S8/16S rRNA ribonucleoprotein particles reveal changes in the 16S rRNA environment of S15 upon addition of S8. These changes occur predominantly in helices 24 and 26 near previously identified S8 binding sites. These S8-dependent conformational changes are consistent with 16S rRNA folding in complete 30S subunits. Thus, while S8 binding is not absolutely required for assembly of the platform, it appears to affect significantly the 16S rRNA environment of S15 by influencing central domain organization.     

Primary structure of rabbit 18S ribosomal RNA determined by direct RNA sequence analysis

The primary structure of rabbit 18S ribosomal RNA was determined by nucleotide sequence analysis of the RNA directly. The rabbit rRNA was specifically cleaved with T1 ribonuclease, as well as with E. coli RNase H using a Pst 1 DNA linker to generate a specific set of overlapping fragments spanning the entire length of the molecule. Both intact and fragmented 18S rRNA were end-labeled with [32P], base-specifically cleaved enzymatically and chemically and nucleotide sequences determined from long polyacrylamide sequencing gels run in formamide. This approach permitted the detection of both cistron heterogeneities and modified bases. Specific nucleotide sequences within E. coli 16S rRNA previously implicated in polyribosome function, tRNA binding, and subunit association are also conserved within the rabbit 18S rRNA. This conservation suggests the likelihood that these regions have similar functions within the eukaryotic 40S subunit.     

Interaction of ribosomal proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 with the central domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli

The co-operative interaction of 30 S ribosomal subunit proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 with 16 S ribosomal RNA from Escherichia coli was studied by (1) determining how the binding of each protein is influenced by the others and (2) characterizing a series of protein-rRNA fragment complexes. Whereas S8 and S15 are known to associate independently with the 16 S rRNA, binding of S18 depended upon S8 and S15, and binding of S6 was found to require S8, S15 and S18. Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) fragments were derived from the S8-, S8/S15- and S6/S8/S15/S18-16 S rRNA complexes by partial RNase hydrolysis and isolated by electrophoresis through Mg2+-containing polyacrylamide gels or by centrifugation through sucrose gradients. Identification of the proteins associated with each RNP by gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate demonstrated the presence of S8, S8 + S15 and S6 + S8 + S15 + S18 in the corresponding fragment complexes. Analysis of the rRNA components of the RNP particles confirmed that S8 was bound to nucleotides 583 to 605 and 624 to 653, and that S8 and S15 were associated with nucleotides 583 to 605, 624 to 672 and 733 to 757. Proteins S6, S8, S15 and S18 were shown to protect nucleotides 563 to 605, 624 to 680, 702 to 770, 818 to 839 and 844 to 891, which span the entire central domain of the 16 S rRNA molecule (nucleotides 560 to 890). The binding site for each protein contains helical elements as well as single-stranded internal loops ranging in size from a single bulged nucleotide to 20 bases. Three terminal loops and one stem-loop structure within the central domain of the 16 S rRNA were not protected in the four-protein complex. Interestingly, bases within or very close to these unprotected regions have been shown to be accessible to chemical and enzymatic probes in 30 S subunits but not in 70 S ribosomes. Furthermore, nucleotides adjacent to one of the unprotected loops have been cross-linked to a region near the 3' end of 16 S rRNA. Our observations and those of others suggest that the bases in this domain that are not sequestered by interactions with S6, S8, S15 or S18 play a role involved in subunit association or in tertiary interactions between portions of the rRNA chain that are distant from one-another in the primary structure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Interaction of Era with the 30S ribosomal subunit implications for 30S subunit assembly

Era (E. coliRas-like protein) is a highly conserved and essential GTPase in bacteria. It binds to the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) of the small (30S) ribosomal subunit, and its depletion leads to accumulation of an unprocessed precursor of the 16S rRNA. We have obtained a three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopic map of the Thermus thermophilus 30S-Era complex. Era binds in the cleft between the head and platform of the 30S subunit and locks the subunit in a conformation that is not favorable for association with the large (50S) ribosomal subunit. The RNA binding KH motif present within the C-terminal domain of Era interacts with the conserved nucleotides in the 3' region of the 16S rRNA. Furthermore, Era makes contact with several assembly elements of the 30S subunit. These observations suggest a direct involvement of Era in the assembly and maturation of the 30S subunit.     

37 A comparative study of ribosomal proteins: linkage between amino acid distribution and ribosomal assembly

Assembly of the ribosome from its protein and RNA constituents has been studied extensively over the past 50?years, and here we utilize a comparative analysis approach to relate the composition of ribosomal proteins (r-proteins) to their role in the assembly process. We computed the amino acid distributions for the 30S subunit r-protein sequences from 560 bacterial species and compared this composition to those of other house-keeping proteins from the same species. We found that r-proteins have a significantly higher content of positively charged residues (Lysine, K, and Arginine, R) than do nonribosomal proteins (10% for R and 11% for K in r-proteins, vs. 4.7% R and 5.9% K in non-ribosomal proteins), which is consistent with prior knowledge of net positive charges carried by r-proteins (Baker et al., 2001; Klein et al., 2004; Burton et al., 2012). Furthermore, these two residues are also highly represented at contact sites along the protein/RNA interface (contact enrichment factor (CEF)?>?1). These results provide further evidence of the importance of electrostatic interactions between the positively charged proteins and negatively charged ribosomal RNA (rRNA) during ribosome assembly. Other highly represented contact residues include polar and aromatic residues, which are likely to interact with rRNA via hydrogen bonds and base stacking interactions, respectively. Interestingly, the proportion of K residues generally decreases with r-protein size, reflecting a negative correlation between protein lengths and the proportion of K (Spearman’s rank correlation, ρ?=??0.802, p?=?2.60e???5). We suggest that this trend helps the smaller r-proteins, which experience higher translational entropy than large proteins, overcome the increased free energy barrier during assembly. When the r-protein sequences were categorized according to the species’ optimal growth temperature, we found that thermophiles show increased R, Isoleucine (I), and Tyrosine (Y) content, whereas mesophiles have increased proportions of Serine (S) and Threonine (T). These results reflect one typical distinction between thermophiles and mesophiles (Kumar and Nussinov 2001), yet these differences in amino acid distributions do not extend to their respective contact sites. That is, the makeup of thermophilic and mesophilic r-protein contact residues are not significantly different (p?>?0.01). This indicates that, while the percent compositions of amino acids relating to qualities such as thermostability and protein folding are expected to vary with environmental temperature, the distributions of residues in contact with rRNA are comparable for all bacterial species. From this, we conclude that the electrostatic interactions that guide ribosome assembly are independent of temperature.     

Ribosomal proteins in halobacteria

The amino acid sequences of 16 ribosomal proteins from archaebacterium Halobacterium marismortui have been determined by a direct protein chemical method. In addition, amino acid sequences of three proteins, S11, S18, and L25, have been established by DNA sequencing of their genes as well as by protein sequencing. Comparison of their sequences with those of ribosomal proteins from other organisms revealed that proteins S14, S16, S19, and L25 are related to both eukaryotic and eubacterial ribosomal proteins, being more homologous to eukaryotic than eubacterial counterparts, and proteins S12, S15, and L16 are related to only eukaryotic ribosomal proteins. Furthermore, some proteins are found to be similar to only eubacterial proteins, whereas other proteins show no homology to any other known ribosomal proteins. Comparisons of amino acid compositions between halophilic and nonhalophilic ribosomal proteins revealed that halophilic proteins gain aspartic and glutamic acid residues and significantly lose lysine and arginine residues. In addition, halophilic proteins seem to lose isoleucine as compared with Escherichia coli ribosomal proteins.     

Organisation of the S10, spc and alpha ribosomal protein gene clusters in prokaryotic genomes

Although it is well known that there is no long range colinearity in gene order in bacterial genomes, it is thought that there are several regions that are under strong structural constraints during evolution, in which gene order is extremely conserved. One such region is the str locus, containing the S10-spc-alpha operons. These operons contain genes coding for ribosomal proteins and for a number of housekeeping genes. We compared the organisation of these gene clusters in 111 sequenced prokaryotic genomes (99 bacterial and 12 archaeal genomes). We also compared the organisation to the phylogeny based on 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequences and the sequences of the ribosomal proteins L22, L16 and S14. Our data indicate that there is much variation in gene order and content in these gene clusters, both in bacterial as well as in archaeal genomes. Our data indicate that differential gene loss has occurred on multiple occasions during evolution. We also noted several discrepancies between phylogenetic trees based on 16S rRNA gene sequences and sequences of ribosomal proteins L16, L22 and S14, suggesting that horizontal gene transfer did play a significant role in the evolution of the S10-spc-alpha gene clusters.     

Directed hydroxyl radical probing of 16S ribosomal RNA in ribosomes containing Fe(II) tethered to ribosomal protein S20.

The 16S ribosomal RNA neighborhood of ribosomal protein S20 has been mapped, in both 30S subunits and 70S ribosomes, using directed hydroxyl radical probing. Cysteine residues were introduced at amino acid positions 14, 23, 49, and 57 of S20, and used for tethering 1-(p-bromoacetamidobenzyl)-Fe(II)-EDTA. In vitro reconstitution using Fe(II)-derivatized S20, together with the remaining small subunit ribosomal proteins and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA), yielded functional 30S subunits. Both 30S subunits and 70S ribosomes containing Fe(II)-S20 were purified and hydroxyl radicals were generated from the tethered Fe(II). Hydroxyl radical cleavage of the 16S rRNA backbone was monitored by primer extension. Different cleavage patterns in 16S rRNA were observed from Fe(II) tethered to each of the four positions, and these patterns were not significantly different in 30S and 70S ribosomes. Cleavage sites were mapped to positions 160-200, 320, and 340-350 in the 5' domain, and to positions 1427-1430 and 1439-1458 in the distal end of the penultimate stem of 16S rRNA, placing these regions near each other in three dimensions. These results are consistent with previous footprinting data that localized S20 near these 16S rRNA elements, providing evidence that S20, like S17, is located near the bottom of the 30S subunit.     

A human autoantibody specific for a unique conserved region of 28 S ribosomal RNA inhibits the interaction of elongation factors 1 alpha and 2 with ribosomes

An autoantibody reactive with a conserved sequence of 28 S rRNA (anti-28 S) was identified in serum from a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus. Anti-28 S protected a unique 59-nucleotide fragment synthesized in vitro against RNase T1 digestion. RNA sequence analysis revealed that it corresponded to residues 1944-2002 in human 28 S rRNA and 1767-1825 in mouse 28 S rRNA. These sequences are identical and highly conserved throughout all known eukaryotic 28 S rRNAs. In addition, this fragment is homologous to residues 1052-1110 of Escherichia coli 23 S rRNA that lies within the GTP hydrolysis center of the 50 S ribosomal subunit. Anti-28 S and its Fab fragments strongly inhibited poly(U)-directed polyphenylalanine synthesis, but had no effect on ribosomal peptidyltransferase activity. This effect resulted from inhibition of the binding of elongation factors EF-1 alpha and EF-2 to ribosomes and of the associated GTP hydrolysis. The inhibitory effect was almost completely suppressed by preincubation of anti-28 S with 28 S rRNA or in vitro synthesized RNA fragments containing the immunoreactive region. These results show that the immunoreactive conserved region of 28 S rRNA participates in the interaction of ribosomes with the two elongation factors in protein synthesis.