Differential modes of regulation of cxc chemokine-induced internalization and recycling of human CXCR1 and CXCR2

Studies of human neutrophil IL-8 receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, have shown that the two receptors are differentially regulated by ELR⁺-CXC chemokines, that they differ functionally and may have diverse roles in mediating the inflammatory process. To elucidate the role of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in inflammation and to delineate the basis for the divergent regulation of these receptors by IL-8 and NAP-2, we characterized the IL-8- and NAP-2-induced mechanisms regulating the expression of each receptor, focusing on receptor internalization and recycling. Using HEK 293 cell transfectants, IL-8 was shown to induce significantly higher levels of CXCR2 internalization than NAP-2. Moreover, although CXCR2 bound IL-8 and NAP-2 with similarly high affinity, IL-8 functionally competed with and displaced NAP-2, and prompted high levels of internalization, similar to those induced by IL-8 alone. In a system providing an identical cellular milieu for reliable comparisons between CXCR1 and CXCR2, we have shown that the mechanisms controlling the internalization of CXCR1 diverge from those regulating CXCR2 internalization. Whereas IL-8-induced internalization of CXCR1 was profoundly dependent on a region of the carboxyl terminus expressing six phosphorylation sites, internalization of CXCR2 was primarily regulated by a membrane proximal domain of the carboxyl terminus that does not express phosphorylation sites. Analysis of receptor re-expression on the plasma membrane indicated that at early time points following removal of free ligand and incubation of the cells at 37°C, receptor recycling accounted for recovery of CXCR1 and CXCR2 expression, whereas at later time points other processes may be involved in receptor re-expression. Phosphorylation-independent mechanisms were shown to direct both receptors to the recycling pathway. The differential control of CXCR1 vs CXCR2 internalization by IL-8 and NAP-2, as well as by phosphorylation-mediated mechanisms, suggests that a chemokine- and receptor-specific mode of regulation of internalization may contribute to the divergent activities of these receptors.     

The effects and comparative differences of neutrophil specific chemokines on neutrophil chemotaxis of the neonate

Neutrophil specific chemokines are potent chemoattractants for neutrophils. IL-8/CXCL8 is the most extensively studied member of this group, and its concentrations increase during inflammatory conditions of the newborn infant including sepsis and chronic lung disease. A significant amount of information exists on the effects of IL-8/CXCL8 on neutrophil chemotaxis of neonates, but little is known about the other neutrophil specific chemokines. The aim of this study was to determine the relative potency of the neutrophil specific chemokines on chemotaxis of neonatal neutrophils and to compare this effect with the effect on adult neutrophils. Neutrophils were isolated from cord blood or healthy adult donors and incubated in a Neuroprobe chemotaxis chamber. Chemokine concentrations ranging from 1-1000 ng/mL were used. Differences in chemotactic potency existed among the seven neutrophil specific chemokines. Specifically, at 100 ng/mL, the order was IL-8/CXCL8>GRO-alpha/CXCL1>GCP-2/CXCL6>NAP-2/CXCL7>ENA-78/CXCL5>GRO-gamma/CXCL2>GRO-beta/CXCL3. This pattern was observed for adult and neonatal neutrophils. We conclude that (1) neutrophils from cord blood exhibit the same pattern of potency for each ELR chemokine as neutrophils from adults, and (2) migration of neonatal neutrophils is significantly less than that of adults at every concentration examined except the lowest (1 ng/mL).     

The CXC chemokine receptor 2, CXCR2, is the putative receptor for ELR+ CXC chemokine-induced angiogenic activity

We have previously shown that members of the ELR(+) CXC chemokine family, including IL-8; growth-related oncogenes alpha, beta, and gamma; granulocyte chemotactic protein 2; and epithelial neutrophil-activating protein-78, can mediate angiogenesis in the absence of preceding inflammation. To date, the receptor on endothelial cells responsible for chemotaxis and neovascularization mediated by these ELR(+) CXC chemokines has not been determined. Because all ELR(+) CXC chemokines bind to CXC chemokine receptor 2 (CXCR2), we hypothesized that CXCR2 is the putative receptor for ELR(+) CXC chemokine-mediated angiogenesis. To test this postulate, we first determined whether cultured human microvascular endothelial cells expressed CXCR2. CXCR2 was detected in human microvascular endothelial cells at the protein level by both Western blot analysis and immunohistochemistry using polyclonal Abs specific for human CXCR2. To determine whether CXCR2 played a functional role in angiogenesis, we determined whether this receptor was involved in endothelial cell chemotaxis. We found that microvascular endothelial cell chemotaxis in response to ELR(+) CXC chemokines was inhibited by anti-CXCR2 Abs. In addition, endothelial cell chemotaxis in response to ELR(+) CXC chemokines was sensitive to pertussis toxin, suggesting a role for G protein-linked receptor mechanisms in this biological response. The importance of CXCR2 in mediating ELR(+) CXC chemokine-induced angiogenesis in vivo was also demonstrated by the lack of angiogenic activity induced by ELR(+) CXC chemokines in the presence of neutralizing Abs to CXCR2 in the rat corneal micropocket assay, or in the corneas of CXCR2(-/-) mice. We thus conclude that CXCR2 is the receptor responsible for ELR(+) CXC chemokine-mediated angiogenesis.     

The Cytomegalovirus UL146 Gene Product vCXCL1 Targets Both CXCR1 and CXCR2 as an Agonist

Large DNA viruses, such as herpesvirus and poxvirus, encode proteins that target and exploit the chemokine system of their host. UL146 and UL147 in the cytomegalovirus (CMV) genome encode the two CXC chemokines vCXCL1 and vCXCL2. In this study, vCXCL1 was probed against a panel of the 18 classified human chemokine receptors. In calcium mobilization assays vCXCL1 acted as an agonist on both CXCR1 and CXCR2 but did not activate or block any of the other 16 chemokine receptors. vCXCL1 was characterized and compared with CXCL1/GROα, CXCL2/GROβ, CXCL3/GROγ, CXCL5/ENA-78, CXCL6/GCP-2, CXCL7/NAP-2 and CXCL8/IL-8 in competition binding, calcium mobilization, inositol triphosphate turnover, and chemotaxis assays using CXCR1- and CXCR2-expressing Chinese hamster ovary, 300.19, COS7, and L1.2 cells. The affinities of vCXCL1 for the CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors were 44 and 5.6 nm, respectively, as determined in competition binding against radioactively labeled CXCL8. In calcium mobilization, phosphatidylinositol turnover, and chemotaxis assays, vCXCL1 acted as a highly efficacious activator of both receptors, with a rather low potency for the CXCR1 receptor but comparable with CXCL5 and CXCL7. It is suggested that CMV uses the UL146 gene product expressed in infected endothelial cells to attract neutrophils by activating their CXCR1 and CXCR2 receptors, whereby neutrophils can act as carriers of the virus to uninfected endothelial cells. In that way a lasting pool of CMV-infected endothelial cells could be maintained.     

CXCL8-induced FAK phosphorylation via CXCR1 and CXCR2: cytoskeleton- and integrin-related mechanisms converge with FAK regulatory pathways in a receptor-specific manner

CXCL8 is a potent chemokine, inducing focal adhesion kinase (FAK) phosphorylation, and migration via a FAK-mediated pathway. Since, unlike growth factors, chemokines directly control integrins and cytoskeleton rearrangements, we determined whether these elements regulate CXCL8-induced FAK phosphorylation. The analysis intentionally dissociated between the CXCL8 receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2. In both CXCR1- and CXCR2-expressing cells, actin and microtubules were required for CXCL8-induced FAK phosphorylation, and CXCL8-induced cell spreading was accompanied by concordant re-localization of FAK with actin and beta-tubulin. The phosphorylation of five FAK sites depended on intact actin filaments and microtubules. While in CXCR2-expressing cells FAK phosphorylation was adhesion-dependent and was stimulated by fibronectin, in CXCR1-expressing cells FAK phosphorylation was adhesion-independent. Of note, even in the absence of integrin stimulation, the CXCL8-induced phosphorylation of FAK in CXCR1-expressing cells required cytoskeletal elements. CXCL8-induced migration in both cell types was highly reliant on actin filaments, but only the migration of CXCR1-expressing cells was fully dependent on microtubules. Overall, several aspects of CXCL8-induced FAK phosphorylation and migration are regulated in a receptor-specific manner. These observations lay the basis for future investigation of the equilibrium between CXCR1 and CXCR2 in cells expressing both receptors together, such as neutrophils, endothelial cells and tumor cells.     

ELR+ CXC chemokines in human milk

CXC chemokines bearing the glutamic acid-leucine-arginine (ELR) motif are crucial mediators in neutrophil-dependent acute inflammation. Interestingly, however, Interleukin (IL)-8/CXC ligand (CXCL) 8 is expressed in human milk in biologically significant concentrations, and may play a local maturational role in the developing human intestine. In this chemokine subfamily, there are six other known peptides beside IL-8/CXCL8, all sharing similar effects on neutrophil chemotaxis and angiogenesis. In this study, we measured the concentrations of these chemokines in human milk, sought their presence in human mammary tissue by immunohistochemistry, and confirmed chemokine expression in cultured human mammary epithelial cells (HMECs). Each of the seven ELR(+) CXC chemokines was measurable in milk, and except for NAP-2/CXCL7, these concentrations were higher than serum. The concentrations were higher in colostrum (except for GRO-beta/CXCL2 and NAP-2/CXCL7), and correlated negatively with time elapsed postpartum. IL-8/CXCL8, GRO-gamma/CXCL3, and ENA-78/CXCL5 concentrations were higher in preterm milk. There was intense immunoreactivity in mammary epithelial cells for all ELR(+) CXC chemokines, and the intensity of staining was higher in breast tissue with lactational changes. The supernatants from confluent HMEC cultures also contained measurable concentrations of all the seven ELR(+) CXC chemokines. These results confirm that all ELR(+) CXC chemokines are actively secreted by the mammary epithelial cells into human milk. Further studies are needed to determine if these chemokines share with IL-8/CXCL8 the protective effects on intestinal epithelial cells.     

Ligand selectivity and affinity of chemokine receptor CXCR1. Role of N-terminal domain

Glu-Leu-Arg ("ELR") CXC chemokines interleukin-8 (IL-8) and melanoma growth stimulatory activity (MGSA) recruit neutrophils by binding and activating two receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2. CXCR1 is specific, binding only IL-8 with nanomolar affinity, whereas CXCR2 is promiscuous, binding all ELRCXC chemokines with high affinity. Receptor signaling consists of two events: interactions between the ligand N-terminal loop (N-loop) and receptor N-terminal domain (N-domain) residues (site I), and between the ligand N-terminal ELR and the receptor juxtamembrane domain (J-domain) residues (site II). It is not known how these interactions mediate ligand affinity and selectivity, and whether binding at one site influences binding and function at the other. Sequence analysis and structure-function studies have suggested that the receptor N-domain plays an important role in ligand selectivity. Here, we report ligand-binding properties and structural characteristics of the CXCR1 N-domain in solution and in detergent micelles that mimic the native membrane environment. We find that IL-8 binds the N-domain with significantly higher affinity in micelles than in solution (approximately 1 microM versus approximately 20 microM) and that MGSA does not bind the N-domain in solution but does in micelles with appreciable affinity (approximately 3 microM). We find that the N-domain is structured in micelles and that the entire N-domain interacts with the micelle in an extended fashion. We conclude that the micellar environment constrains the N-domain, and this conformational restraint influences its ligand-binding properties. Most importantly, our data suggest that for both ligands, site I interaction provides similar affinity and that differential coupling between site I and II interactions is responsible for the observed differences in affinity.     

Differential expression and responsiveness of chemokine receptors (CXCR1-3) by human microvascular endothelial cells and umbilical vein endothelial cells.

The basis for the angiogenic effects of CXC chemokines such as interleukin 8 (IL-8) and for angiostatic chemokines such as interferon-inducible protein 10 (IP-10) has been difficult to assess. We recently reported, based on an RNase protection assay, that human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) did not express detectable mRNA for the IL-8 receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2. This raised the possibility of heterogeneity of receptor expression by different endothelial cell (ECs) types. Since systemic angiogenesis induced by IL-8 would more likely involve microvessel ECs, we investigated CXC receptor expression on human microvascular dermal endothelial cells (HMECs). By confocal microscopy and immunofluorescence we observed that HMECs consistently expressed high levels of CXCR1 and CXCR4 (mean fluorescence intensity of 261+/-22.1 and 306.2+/-19, respectively) and intermediate levels of CXCR3 and CXCR2 (173.9+/-30. 2 and 156+/-30.9, respectively). In contrast, only a small proportion of HUVEC preparations expressed low levels of CXCR1, -2, and -3 (66+/-19.9; 49+/-15, and 81.4+/-17.9, respectively). However, both HMECs and HUVECs expressed equal levels of CXCR4. As expected, HMECs had more potent chemotactic responses to IL-8 than HUVECs, and this was correlated with the levels of IL-8 receptors on the ECs. Antibodies to CXCR1 and CXCR2 each had inhibitory effects on chemotaxis of HMECs to IL-8, indicating that both IL-8 receptors contributed to the migratory response of these cells toward IL-8. Assessment of the functional capacity of CXCR3 unexpectedly revealed that HMECs migrated in response to relatively higher concentrations (100-500 ng/ml) of each of the 'angiostatic' chemokines IP-10, ITAC, and MIG. Despite this, the 'angiostatic' chemokines inhibited the chemotactic response of HMECs to IL-8. IL-8 and SDF-1alpha but not IP-10 induced calcium mobilization in adherent ECs, suggesting that signaling events associated with calcium mobilization are separable from those required for chemotaxis. Taken together, our data indicated that functional differences among EC types is dependent on the level of the expression of CXC chemokine receptors. Whether this heterogeneity in receptor expression by ECs reflects distinct differentiation pathways remains to be established.     

Molecular cloning and genomic structure of an interleukin-8 receptor-like gene from homozygous clones of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss)

Chemokines are small proteins (70-100 amino acids) which play an important role in recruitment and activation of leucocytes to migrate to the site of inflammation. Based on the position of the first two conserved cysteines, chemokines are classified into four subfamilies: C, CC, CXC and CX3C. To date, many members of CC and CXC have been found and studied extensively [1]. Chemokines exert effects on their target cell via chemokine receptors, which are G-protein coupled receptors containing seven transmembrane domains with an extracellular N-terminus and an intracellular C-terminus [2]. Interleukin 8 (IL-8) belongs to the CXC chemokine subfamily. It can activate and attract migratory neutrophils to an inflammation site. Two IL-8 receptors, CXCR1 and CXCR2, have been identified in mammals [3-6]; both of these receptors have high affinity for IL-8 and are expressed on the neutrophil. CXCR1 just binds IL-8; however, CXCR2 binds IL-8 and other structurally related chemokines such as growth-related oncogene (GRO) a, GRObeta, GROgamma, neutrophil-activating peptide-2 (NAP-2) and epithelial cell-derived neutrophil activating peptide-78 (ENA-78) [7, 8]. Several studies on fish chemokine receptors have been reported [9-11]. Thus far, however, IL-8 and CXCR1 and CXCR2 proteins from rainbow trout have not been reported: however, the sequence of a rainbow trout IL-8 has been noted (GenBank Accession No. AJ279069 [12]). Cloning of the IL-8 receptor is important to study the function of IL-8/CXCR1 and (CXCR2) in inflammation and signal transduction in fish. This paper reports the molecular cloning and genomic structure of an IL-8 receptor-like gene from four homozygous clones of rainbow trout: Oregon State University (OSU), Hot Creek (HC), Arlee (AR) and Swanson (SW).     

Cloning and characterization of mouse homolog of the CXC chemokine receptor CXCR1

CXCR2/IL-8RB was the only receptor previously reported in mice for ELR+ CXC chemokines, whereas the receptors for these chemokines in human include both CXCR1 and CXCR2. In this study, we cloned the full length cDNA of the mouse CXCR1 (mCXCR1) gene. The deduced amino acid of mCXCR1 was 77% and 58% identical to the rat and human CXCR1, respectively. RT-PCR and Northern blot analysis showed that mCXCR1 mRNA was expressed in lung, spleen, thymus, peripheral blood leukocytes, as well as in the isolated neutrophils. In a mouse respiratory inflammation model induced by lipopolysaccharide, a large number of neutrophils infiltrated into the lung and, meanwhile, the mCXCR1 expression was significantly increased in the recruited neutrophils, suggesting that mCXCR1 may mediate the recruitment of neutrophils to the inflammation site under certain infections.     

CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand biology during lung transplant ischemia-reperfusion injury

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for a number of end-stage pulmonary disorders. Early lung allograft dysfunction (ischemia-reperfusion injury) continues to be the most common cause of early mortality after lung transplantation and a significant risk factor for the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is characterized histopathologically by lung edema and a neutrophil predominate leukocyte extravasation. The specific mechanism(s) that recruit leukocytes to the lung during post-lung transplantation ischemia-reperfusion injury have not been fully elucidated. Because the ELR+ CXC chemokines are potent neutrophil chemoattractants, we investigated their role during post-lung transplantation ischemic-reperfusion injury. We found elevated levels of multiple ELR+ CXC chemokines in human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with ischemia-reperfusion injury. Proof of concept studies using a rat orthotopic lung transplantation model of "cold" ischemic-reperfusion injury demonstrated an increase in lung graft neutrophil sequestration and injury. In addition, lung expression of CXCL1, CXCL2/3, and their shared receptor CXCR2 paralleled lung neutrophil infiltration and injury. Importantly, inhibition of CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand interactions in vivo led to a marked reduction in lung neutrophil sequestration and graft injury. Taken together these experiments support the notion that increased expression of ELR+ CXC chemokines and their interaction with CXCR2 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of post-lung transplantation cold ischemia-reperfusion injury.     

NH2- and COOH-terminal truncations of murine granulocyte chemotactic protein-2 augment the in vitro and in vivo neutrophil chemotactic potency

Chemokines are important mediators of leukocyte migration during the inflammatory response. Post-translational modifications affect the biological potency of chemokines. In addition to previously identified NH2-terminally truncated forms, COOH-terminally truncated forms of the CXC chemokine murine granulocyte chemotactic protein-2 (GCP-2) were purified from conditioned medium of stimulated fibroblasts. The truncations generated 28 natural murine GCP-2 isoforms containing 69-92 residues, including most intermediate forms. Both NH2- and COOH-terminal truncations of GCP-2 resulted in enhanced chemotactic potency for human and murine neutrophils in vitro. The truncated isoform GCP-2(9-78) was 30-fold more potent than intact GCP-2(1-92)/LPS-induced CXC chemokine (LIX) at inducing an intracellular calcium increase in human neutrophils. After intradermal injection in mice, GCP-2(9-78) was also more effective than GCP-2(1-92)/LIX at inducing neutrophil infiltration. Similar to human IL-8 and GCP-2, murine GCP-2(9-78) and macrophage inflammatory protein-2 (MIP-2) induced calcium increases in both CXCR1 and CXCR2 transfectants. Murine GCP-2(9-78) could desensitize the calcium response induced by MIP-2 in human neutrophils and vice versa. Furthermore, MIP-2 and truncated GCP-2(9-78), but not intact GCP-2(1-92)/LIX, partially desensitized the calcium response to human IL-8 in human neutrophils. Taken together, these findings point to an important role of post-translationally modified GCP-2 to replace IL-8 in the mouse.     

Biochemical and biological characterization of neutrophil chemotactic protein, a novel rabbit CXC chemokine from alveolar macrophages

The role of interleukin-8 (IL-8) and related CXC chemokines has been demonstrated in many human diseases. However, more profound studies, e.g., by blocking the effect of these inflammatory mediators, request animal models and hence the identification of all human counterparts for commonly used laboratory animals. In this study, we describe the identification of a novel neutrophil chemotactic protein (NCP) of the rabbit. Intact and NH(2)-terminally truncated NCP forms and IL-8 were isolated from LPS-stimulated rabbit alveolar macrophages and purified to homogeneity by a four-step purification procedure. Determination of the complete primary structure of NCP by mass spectrometry and NH(2)-terminal sequencing of natural protein revealed high structural homology with human epithelial cell-derived neutrophil attractant-78 (ENA-78) and granulocyte chemotactic protein-2 (GCP-2), two related ELR(+)CXC chemokines. Intact NCP(1-76) was found to be 10-fold less potent than truncated NCP(7, 8-76) at inducing neutrophil chemotaxis. NCP(7,8-76) was equally potent as intact rabbit IL-8 at chemoattracting human neutrophils and at inducing calcium fluxes in rabbit neutrophils, 1 ng/mL being the minimal effective concentration. However, like IL-8, NCP failed to induce monocyte or eosinophil migration at 300-fold higher concentrations. IL-8 desensitized the calcium increase induced by NCP and vice versa. Finally, intradermal injection of NCP induced a dose-dependent and significant infiltration of neutrophils in mice skin. It can be concluded that NCP is a novel rabbit CXC chemokine that is, like IL-8, implicated in animal models used to study various human disorders in which neutrophils play an important role.     

Depletion of CXCR2 inhibits tumor growth and angiogenesis in a murine model of lung cancer

The Glu-Leu-Arg(+) (ELR(+)) CXC chemokines are potent promoters of angiogenesis and have been demonstrated to induce a significant portion of nonsmall cell lung cancer-derived angiogenic activity and support tumorigenesis. ELR(+) CXC chemokines share a common chemokine receptor, CXCR2. We hypothesized that CXCR2 mediates the proangiogenic effects of ELR(+) CXC chemokines during tumorigenesis. To test this postulate, we used syngeneic murine Lewis lung cancer (LLC; 3LL, H-2(b)) heterotopic and orthotopic tumor model systems in C57BL/6 mice replete (CXCR2(+/+)) and deficient in CXCR2 (CXCR2(-/-)). We first demonstrated a correlation of the expression of endogenous ELR(+) CXC chemokines with tumor growth and metastatic potential of LLC tumors. Next, we found that LLC primary tumors were significantly reduced in growth in CXCR2(-/-) mice. Moreover, we found a marked reduction in the spontaneous metastases of heterotopic tumors to the lungs of CXCR2(-/-) mice. Morphometric analysis of the primary tumors in CXCR2(-/-) mice demonstrated increased necrosis and reduced vascular density. These findings were further confirmed in CXCR2(+/+) mice using specific neutralizing Abs to CXCR2. The results of these studies support the notion that CXCR2 mediates the angiogenic activity of ELR(+) CXC chemokines in a preclinical model of lung cancer.     

Gelatinase B/MMP-9 and neutrophil collagenase/MMP-8 process the chemokines human GCP-2/CXCL6, ENA-78/CXCL5 and mouse GCP-2/LIX and modulate their physiological activities.

On chemokine stimulation, leucocytes produce and secrete proteolytic enzymes for innate immune defence mechanisms. Some of these proteases modify the biological activity of the chemokines. For instance, neutrophils secrete gelatinase B (matrix metalloproteinase-9, MMP-9) and neutrophil collagenase (MMP-8) after stimulation with interleukin-8/CXCL8 (IL-8). Gelatinase B cleaves and potentiates IL-8, generating a positive feedback. Here, we extend these findings and compare the processing of the CXC chemokines human and mouse granulocyte chemotactic protein-2/CXCL6 (GCP-2) and the closely related human epithelial-cell derived neutrophil activating peptide-78/CXCL5 (ENA-78) with that of human IL-8. Human GCP-2 and ENA-78 are cleaved by gelatinase B at similar rates to IL-8. In addition, GCP-2 is cleaved by neutrophil collagenase, but at a lower rate. The cleavage of GCP-2 is exclusively N-terminal and does not result in any change in biological activity. In contrast, ENA-78 is cleaved by gelatinase B at eight positions at various rates, finally generating inactive fragments. Physiologically, sequential cleavage of ENA-78 may result in early potentiation and later in inactivation of the chemokine. Remarkably, in the mouse, which lacks IL-8 which is replaced by GCP-2/LIX as the most potent neutrophil activating chemokine, N-terminal clipping and twofold potentiation by gelatinase B was also observed. In addition to the similarities in the potentiation of IL-8 in humans and GCP-2 in mice, the conversion of mouse GCP-2/LIX by mouse gelatinase B is the fastest for any combination of chemokines and MMPs so far reported. This rapid conversion was also performed by crude neutrophil granule secretion under physiological conditions, extending the relevance of this proteolytic cleavage to the in vivo situation.     

Interleukin 8, neutrophil-activating peptide-2 and GRO-alpha bind to and elicit cell activation via specific and different amino acid residues of CXCR2

The objective of this investigation was to determine the amino acid residues of the human neutrophil CXC chemokine receptor-2 (CXCR2) that are critical for binding the ligands interleukin 8 (IL-8), neutrophil-activating peptide-2 (NAP-2), and growth-related protein alpha (GROalpha) and critical for receptor-mediated signal transduction. Charged residues of the amino terminus and the first extracellular loop of CXCR2 were targeted for point mutagenesis studies. Seven separate CXCR2 mutants (Glu7, Asp9, Glu12, Asp13, Lys108, Asn110, and Lys120, all to Ala) were generated. Based on the Scatchard analysis of radioligand binding studies, the following amino acids were deemed critical for ligand binding: (i) Asp9, Glu12, Lys108, and Lys120 for IL-8 and (ii) Glu7, Asp9, and Glu12 for GROalpha. Point mutations in the amino terminus domain (Asp9 and Glu12) and the first extracellular loop (Lys108, Asn110, and Lys120) of CXCR2 reduced cell activation to all three ligands as measured by changes in intracellular calcium concentration. In conclusion, high-affinity binding of IL-8, NAP-2, and GROalpha to CXCR2 involves interaction with specific and different amino acid residues of CXCR2. Furthermore, we propose that the CXCR2 amino acid residues required for cell activation are not necessarily the same residues required for ligand binding.     

Role of the cytoplasmic tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in mediating leukocyte migration,activation, and regulation

IL-8 (or CXCL8) activates the receptors CXCR1 (IL-8RA) and CXCR2 (IL-8RB) to induce chemotaxis in leukocytes, but only CXCR1 mediates cytotoxic and cross-regulatory signals. This may be due to the rapid internalization of CXCR2. To investigate the roles of the intracellular domains in receptor regulation, wild-type, chimeric, phosphorylation-deficient, and cytoplasmic tail (C-tail) deletion mutants of both receptors were expressed in RBL-2H3 cells and studied for cellular activation, receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, and internalization. All but one chimeric receptor bound IL-8 and mediated signal transduction, chemotaxis, and exocytosis. Upon IL-8 activation, the chimeric receptors underwent receptor phosphorylation and desensitization. One was resistant to internalization, yet it mediated normal levels of beta-arrestin 2 (beta arr-2) translocation. The lack of internalization by this receptor may be due to its reduced association with beta arr-2 and the adaptor protein-2 beta. The C-tail-deleted and phosphorylation-deficient receptors were resistant to receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, arrestin translocation, and internalization. They also mediated greater phosphoinositide hydrolysis and exocytosis and sustained Ca(2+) mobilization, but diminished chemotaxis. These data indicate that phosphorylation of the C-tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 are required for arrestin translocation and internalization, but are not sufficient to explain the rapid internalization of CXCR2 relative to CXCR1. The data also show that receptor internalization is not required for chemotaxis. The lack of receptor phosphorylation was correlated with greater signal transduction but diminished chemotaxis, indicating that second messenger production, not receptor internalization, negatively regulates chemotaxis.     

Role of tyrosine phosphorylation in ligand-independent sequestration of CXCR4 in human primary monocytes-macrophages

The chemokine stromal cell-derived factor (SDF)-1 and its receptor, CXCR4, play important roles in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) pathophysiology, leukocyte trafficking, inflammation, hematopoiesis, embryogenesis, angiogenesis, and cancer metastasis. The effects of cytokines on the regulation of CXCR4 function were investigated in human primary monocytes-macrophages. The expression of functional CXCR4 on the cell surface was demonstrated by the detection of ligand-induced Ca(2+) mobilization, chemotaxis, and ligand-induced receptor endocytosis. Surface CXCR4 expression was down-regulated by cytokines interleukin-4 (IL-4), IL-13, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and up-regulated by IL-10 and transforming growth factor-beta 1. Down-regulation was mediated post-translationally, in the absence of protein degradation, through an endocytotic mechanism. In contrast to SDF-1 alpha-induced CXCR4 endocytosis, cytokine-induced endocytosis of this receptor was independent of actin filament polymerization. GM-CSF increased the expression of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 3 (GRK3), beta-arrestin-1, Pyk2, and focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Cytokine treatment also increased the total and tyrosine-specific phosphorylation of CXCR4 as well as the phosphorylation of FAK on tyrosine 397. It also induced the formation of GRK3.CXCR4 or FAK.CXCR4 complexes. Infection of macrophages by primary R5X4 and X4 isolates of HIV-1 was inhibited by IL-4, IL-13, and GM-CSF, an effect that was associated with down-regulation of surface CXCR4 expression. These data indicate that ligand-dependent and ligand-independent endocytoses of CXCR4 are mediated by different mechanisms. Cytokine-induced endocytosis of chemokine receptors may be of therapeutic value in HIV-1 infection, inflammation, tumor metastasis, and defective hematopoiesis.