Home based care and standard hospital care for patients with severe mental illness: a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE--To compare the efficacy of home based care with standard hospital care in treating serious mental illness. DESIGN--Randomised controlled trial. SETTING--South Southwark, London. PATIENTS--189 patients aged 18-64 living in catchment area. 92 were randomised to home based care (daily living programme) and 97 to standard hospital care. At three months'' follow up 68 home care and 60 hospital patients were evaluated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Use of hospital beds, psychiatric diagnosis, social functioning, patients'' and relatives'' satisfaction, and activity of daily living programme staff. RESULTS--Home care reduced hospital stay by 80% (median stay six days in home care group, 53 days in hospital group) and did not increase the number of admissions compared with hospital care. On clinical and social outcome there was a non-significant trend in favour of home care, but both groups showed big improvements. On the global adjustment scale home care patients improved by 26.8 points and the hospital group by 21.6 points (difference 5.2; 95% confidence interval -1.5 to 12). Other rating scales showed similar trends. Home care patients required a wide range of support in areas such as housing, finance, and work. Only three patients dropped out from the programme. CONCLUSIONS--Home based care may offer some slight advantages over hospital based care for patients with serious mental illness and their relatives. The care is intensive, but the low drop out rate suggests appreciation. Changes to traditional training for mental health workers are required.     

Randomised controlled trial of day patient versus inpatient psychiatric treatment.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the proportion of acutely ill psychiatric patients who can be treated in a day hospital and compare the outcome of day patient and inpatient treatment. DESIGN--Prospective randomised controlled trial of day patient versus inpatient treatment after exclusion of patients precluded by severity of illness or other factors from being treated as day patients. All three groups assessed at three and 12 months. SETTING--Teaching hospital serving small socially deprived inner city area. Day hospital designed to take acute admissions because of few beds. PATIENTS--175 Patients were considered, of whom 73 could not be allocated. Of the remaining 102 patients, 51 were allocated to each treatment setting but only 89 became established in treatment--namely, 41 day patients and 48 inpatients. 73 Of these 89 patients were reassessed at three months and 70 at one year. INTERVENTIONS--Standard day patient and inpatient treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Discharge from hospital and return to previous level of social functioning; reduction of psychiatric symptoms, abnormal behaviour, and burden on relatives. RESULTS--33 Of 48 inpatients were discharged at three months compared with 17 of 41 day patients. But at one year 9 of 48 inpatients and three of 41 day patients were in hospital. 18 Of 35 day patients and 16 of 39 inpatients were at their previous level of social functioning at one year. The only significant difference at three months was a greater improvement in social role performance in the inpatients. At one year there was no significant difference between day patients and inpatients in present state examination summary scores and social role performance, burden, or behaviour. CONCLUSIONS--Roughly 40% of all acutely ill patients presenting for admission to a psychiatric unit may be treated satisfactorily in a well staffed day hospital. The outcome of treatment is similar to that of inpatient care but might possibly reduce readmissions. The hospital costs seem to be similar but further research is required to assess the costs in terms of extra demands on relatives, general practitioners, and other community resources.     

"Homeward bound": a minimal care rehabilitation unit.

A 20 bed minimal care rehabilitation unit was set up by Newham District Health Authority in a small hospital originally scheduled for closure when a new district general hospital was opened. During the first year 114 patients were admitted (throughput 5.7), with a median length of stay of 30 days; in the second year 173 patients were admitted (throughput 8.65) with a median length of stay of 28.5 days. The cost per inpatient day was less than that of an inpatient day at the district''s long stay geriatric unit. Before the unit opened 24% of the acute beds had been occupied for more than six weeks, whereas two years later only 6% of the acute beds were occupied for such a period.     

Inappropriate hospital use by patients receiving care for medical conditions: targeting utilization review

OBJECTIVE: To describe characteristics associated with inappropriate hospital use by patients in Manitoba in order to help target concurrent utilization review. Utilization review was developed to reduce inappropriate hospital use but can be a very resource-intensive process. DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of a sample of adult patients who received care for medical conditions in a sample of Manitoba hospitals during the fiscal year 1993-94; assessment of patients at admission and for each day of stay with the use of a standardized set of objective, nondiagnosis-based criteria (InterQual). PATIENTS: A total of 3904 patients receiving care at 26 hospitals. OUTCOME MEASURES: Acute (appropriate) and nonacute (inappropriate) admissions and days of stay for adult patients receiving care for medical conditions. RESULTS: After 1 week, 53.2% of patients assessed as needing acute care at admission no longer required acute care. Patients 75 years of age or older consumed more than 50% of the days of stay, and 74.8% of these days of stay were inappropriate. Four diagnostic categories accounted for almost 60% of admissions and days, and more than 50% of those days of stay were inappropriate. Patients admitted through the emergency department were more likely to require acute care (60.9%) than others (41.7%). Patients who were Treaty Indians had a higher proportion of days of stay requiring acute care than others (45.9% v. 32.8%). Patients'' income and day of the week on admission (weekday v. weekend) were not predictive factors of inappropriate use. CONCLUSION: Rather than conducting a utilization review for every patient, hospitals might garner more information by targeting patients receiving care for medical conditions with stays longer than 1 week, patients with nervous system, circulatory, respiratory or digestive diagnoses, elderly patients and patients not admitted through the emergency department.     

Trial of brief intermittent neuroleptic prophylaxis for selected schizophrenic outpatients: clinical and social outcome at two years.

OBJECTIVE--To evaluate a novel approach to the prophylaxis of schizophrenic relapse characterised by administration of brief courses of neuroleptic for the earliest non-psychotic signs of relapse (prodromal symptoms). DESIGN--Two year follow up of subjects randomised, double blind, to receive either active (control group) or placebo (intermittent group) depot neuroleptic medication. Both groups received brief courses of oral neuroleptic when prodromal symptoms or relapse occurred. SETTING--Psychiatric outpatient department, Charing Cross Hospital, London. SUBJECTS--54 Stable patients in remission who met the American Psychiatric Association''s DSM-III criteria for schizophrenia on the basis of case notes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Survival without relapse, survival without hospitalisation, point prevalence of extrapyramidal side effects and tardive dyskinesia, structured assessment of social functioning (social adjustment scale II), and frequency of prodromal symptoms. RESULTS--Of 19 relapses recorded over two years, 10 (53%) were preceded by non-psychotic prodromal signs. Survival rates for both relapse and hospitalisation were worse with intermittent treatment than continuous treatment over the two year follow up: 92% of controls and only 54% of patients given intermittent treatment survived the two year period without hospitalisation. Prolonged or frequent relapses as well as episodes of prodromal symptoms were more frequent with intermittent treatment. Lower scores for extrapyramidal side effects were recorded in the intermittent treatment group, but periodic assessments of social functioning failed to show any social advantages from this. CONCLUSION--The findings are at variance with a previous report of one year follow up in this cohort and attest to the superiority of continuous depot neuroleptic prophylaxis in preventing both psychotic and neurotic or dysphoric morbidity in schizophrenia.     

Randomised controlled trial comparing effectiveness and acceptability of an early discharge,hospital at home scheme with acute hospital care

Objective: To compare effectiveness and acceptability of early discharge to a hospital at home scheme with that of routine discharge from acute hospital. Design: Pragmatic randomised controlled trial. Setting: Acute hospital wards and community in north of Bristol, with a catchment population of about 224 000 people. Subjects: 241 hospitalised but medically stable elderly patients who fulfilled criteria for early discharge to hospital at home scheme and who consented to participate. Interventions: Patients’ received hospital at home care or routine hospital care. Main outcome measures: Patients’ quality of life, satisfaction, and physical functioning assessed at 4 weeks and 3 months after randomisation to treatment; length of stay in hospital and in hospital at home scheme after randomisation; mortality at 3 months. Results: There were no significant differences in patient mortality, quality of life, and physical functioning between the two arms of the trial at 4 weeks or 3 months. Only one of 11 measures of patient satisfaction was significantly different: hospital at home patients perceived higher levels of involvement in decisions. Length of stay for those receiving routine hospital care was 62% (95% confidence interval 51% to 75%) of length of stay in hospital at home scheme. Conclusions: The early discharge hospital at home scheme was similar to routine hospital discharge in terms of effectiveness and acceptability. Increased length of stay associated with the scheme must be interpreted with caution because of different organisational characteristics of the services.

Key messages

• Pressure on hospital beds, the increasing age of the population, and high costs associated with acute hospital care have fuelled the search for alternatives to inpatient hospital care
• There were no significant differences between early discharge to hospital at home scheme and routine hospital care in terms of patient quality of life, physical functioning, and most measures of patient satisfaction
• Length of stay for hospital patients was significantly shorter than that of hospital at home patients, but, owing to qualitative differences between the two interventions, this does not necessarily mean differences in effectiveness
• Early discharge to hospital at home provides an acceptable alternative to routine hospital care in terms of effectiveness and patient acceptability

     

Evaluation of a stroke family care worker: results of a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of contact with a stroke family care worker on the physical, social, and psychological status of stroke patients and their carers. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with broad entry criteria and blinded outcome assessment six months after randomisation. SETTING: A well organised stroke service in an Edinburgh teaching hospital. SUBJECTS: 417 patients with an acute stroke in the previous 30 days randomly allocated to be contacted by a stroke family care worker (210) or to receive standard care (207). The patients represented 67% of all stroke patients assessed at the hospital during the study period. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient completed Barthel index, Frenchay activities index, general health questionnaire, hospital anxiety and depression scale, social adjustment scale, mental adjustment to stroke scale, and patient satisfaction questionnaire; carer completed Frenchay activities index, general health questionnaire, hospital anxiety and depression scale, social adjustment scale, caregiving bassles scale, and carer satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: The groups were balanced for all important baseline variables. There were no significant differences in physical outcomes in patients or carers, though patients in the treatment group were possibly more helpless less well adjusted socially, and more depressed, whereas carers in the treatment group were possibly less hassled and anxious. However, both patients and carers in the group contacted by the stroke family care worker expressed significantly greater satisfaction with certain aspects of their care, in particular those related to communication and support. CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of a stroke family care worker improved patients'' and their carers'' satisfaction with services and may have had some effect on psychological and social outcomes but did not improve measures of patients'' physical wellbeing.     

Effects of a medical team coordinator on length of hospital stay.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of a medical team coordinator (MTC) on the length of stay in a teaching hospital. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Two of four general medical clinical teaching units (CTUs). PATIENTS: Patients admitted to the CTUs between July and October 1990 except those who were admitted directly to an intensive care unit or whose death was expected within 48 hours. The 267 patients were randomly assigned to receive either standard medical care or standard medical care plus MTC services. INTERVENTION: The MTC was a baccalaureate nurse whose role was to facilitate administrative tasks such as discharge planning, to coordinate tests and procedures, and to collect and collate patient information. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of hospital stay. A subgroup of 40 patients was asked to complete a brief survey on medical care information and satisfaction. RESULTS: The MTC intervention reduced the mean length of stay by 1.97 days (p less than or equal to 0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02 to 2.92 days). Subanalysis by diagnostic group revealed that most of this effect was in an ill-defined group of disorders. In the survey more patients in the MTC group than in the other group reported being satisfied with their medical care (89% v. 62%; p less than or equal to 0.05, 95% CI 2% to 52%). CONCLUSIONS: The services of an MTC help to reduce the length of hospital stay for some groups of patients. Further research is necessary to examine which components of the MTC intervention are most effective and in what conditions.     

A 6-hour working day--effects on health and well-being

The effect of the total amount of work hours and the benefits of a shortening is frequently debated, but very little data is available. The present study compared a group (N = 41) that obtained a 9 h reduction of the working week (to a 6 h day) with a comparison group (N = 22) that retained normal work hours. Both groups were constituted of mainly female health care and day care nursery personnel. The experimental group retained full pay and extra personnel were employed to compensate for loss of hours. Questionnaire data were obtained before and 1 year after the change. The data were analyzed using a two-factor ANOVA with the interaction term year*group as the main focus. The results showed a significant interaction of year*group for social factors, sleep quality, mental fatigue, and heart/respiratory complaints, and attitude to work hours. In all cases the experimental group improved whereas the control group did not change. It was concluded that shortened work hours have clear social effects and moderate effects on well-being.     

The outcome of targeting community mental health services: evidence from the West Lambeth schizophrenia cohort.

OBJECTIVES--To report outcome of targeting community mental health services to people with schizophrenia in an inner London district who had been shown, one year after discharge, to have high levels of psychotic symptomatology and social disability but very low levels of supported housing and structured day activity. DESIGN--Repeat interview survey of symptoms, disability, and receipt of care four years after index discharge. SETTING--Inner London health district with considerable social deprivation and a mental hospital in the process of closure. SUBJECTS--51 patients originally aged 20-65 years who satisfied the research diagnostic criteria for schizophrenia. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Contact with services during the three months before interview, levels of symptoms (from present state examination), global social disability rating. RESULTS--65% (33/51) of the study group had been readmitted at least once in the three years between surveys. Recent contacts with community psychiatric nurses and rates of hospital admission increased (8 at one year v 24 at four years, p < 0.01; 5 v 13, p < 0.06). Conversely, fewer patients were in contact with social workers (17 v 7, p < 0.03). Proportions in supported housing, day care, or sheltered work did not change. Unemployment rates remained very high. A considerable reduction (almost a halving) in psychiatric symptoms was observed, but there was no significant change in mean levels of social disability. CONCLUSIONS--The policy of targeting the long term mentally ill resulted in significant increases in professional psychiatric input to the cohort but failed to improve access to social workers or suitable accommodation. Improvements in social functioning did not follow from reductions in the proportions of patients with psychotic mental states. Social interventions are likely to be crucial to achieving the Health of the Nation target of improving social functioning for the seriously mentally ill, as improving mental state seems in itself to be insufficient.     

无创正压通气治疗重症社区获得性肺炎临床疗效和预后影响

摘要 目的：考察无创正压机械通气(noninvasive positive-presure ventilation,NIPPV)对重症社区获得性肺炎(Severe community acquired Pneumonia,SCAP)的治疗效果和预后的影响。方法：以2018年7月-2020年2月我院收治的80例SCAP患者为研究对象,采用随机数字法分为无创组和常规组,各40例。两组患者均在在入院后均接受常规治疗,无创组在常规治疗的基础上进行NIPPV治疗。详细记录患者治疗前和治疗后1 h、24 h的体温、呼吸、血压、心率、血二氧化碳分压(arterial partial pressure of CO₂,PaCO₂)、氧合指数(PaO₂/FIO₂)、气管插管率、病死率、ICU住院天数,对患者入院的第1、3、7 d的血清可溶性尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体(soluble urokinase-plasminogen activator receptor,suPAR)、降钙素原(procalcitonin,PCT)及C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)的水平进行检测。结果：治疗后1 h和24 h,无创组患者呼吸、心率、PaCO₂、PaO₂/FIO₂和PH均显著的改善（P＜0.05）,显示NIPPV可明显改善患者肺部气体交换,减慢呼吸频率、提高氧和指数,降低二氧化碳分压;第1 d两组患者的PCT、CRP和suPAR的水平无明显差异（P＞0.05）,相对于第1 d,两组患者第3 d和第7 d的PCT、CRP和suPAR水平均明显的降低（P＜0.05）;相对于常规组,第3 d和第7 d无创组患者的PCT、CRP和suPAR水平有显著的降低（P＜0.05）;与常规组相比,无创组患者的插管率、ICU住院天数和死亡率统计学上无显著差异（P＞0.05）,但均有一定程度上的降低。结论：NIPPV能显著改善SCAP患者的呼气情况,降低血清PCT、CRP和suPAR水平,对降低气管插管率、缩短ICU住院天数,降低患者死亡率有一定的效果。     

Cost effectiveness of day and inpatient psychiatric treatment: results of a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare direct and indirect costs of day and inpatient treatment of acute psychiatric illness. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial with outcome and costs assessed over 12 months after the date of admission. SETTING: Teaching hospital in an inner city area. SUBJECTS: 179 patients with acute psychiatric illness referred for admission who were suitable for random allocation to day hospital or inpatient treatment. 77 (43%) patients had schizophrenia. INTERVENTIONS: Routine inpatient or day hospital treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Direct and indirect costs over 12 months, clinical symptoms, social functioning, and burden on relatives over the follow up period. RESULTS: Clinical and social outcomes were similar at 12 months, except that inpatients improved significantly faster than day patients and burden on relatives was significantly less in the day hospital group at one year. Median direct costs to the hospital were 1923 pounds (95% confidence interval 750 pounds to 3174 pounds) per patient less for day hospital treatment than inpatient treatment. Indirect costs were greater for day patients; when these were included, overall day hospital treatment was 2165 pounds cheaper than inpatient treatment (95% confidence interval of median difference 737 pounds to 3593 pounds). Including costs to informants when appropriate meant that day hospital treatment was 1994 pounds per patient cheaper (95% confidence interval 600 pounds to 3543 pounds). CONCLUSIONS: Day patient treatment is cheaper for the 30-40% of potential admissions that can be treated in this way. Carers of day hospital patients may bear additional costs. Carers of all patients with acute psychiatric illness are often themselves severely distressed at the time of admission, but day hospital treatment leads to less burden on carers in the long term.     

The need for acute,subacute, and nonacute care at 105 general hospital sites on Ontario

BACKGROUND: Previous studies of hospital utilization have not taken into account the use of acute care beds for subacute care. The authors determined the proportion of patients who required acute, subacute and nonacute care on admission and during their hospital stay in general hospitals in Ontario. From this analysis, they identified areas where the efficiency of care delivery might be improved. METHODS: Ninety-eight of 189 acute care hospitals in Ontario, at 105 sites, participated in a review that used explicit criteria for rating acuity developed by Inter-Qual Inc., Marlborough, Mass. The records of 13,242 patients who were discharged over a 9-month period in 1995 after hospital care for 1 of 8 high-volume, high-variability diagnoses or procedures were randomly selected for review. Patients were categorized on the basis of the level of care (acute, subacute or nonacute) they required on admission and during subsequent days of hospital care. RESULTS: Of all admissions, 62.2% were acute, 19.7% subacute and 18.1% nonacute. The patients most likely to require acute care on admission were those with acute myocardial infarction (96.2% of 1826 patients) or cerebrovascular accident (84.0% of 1596 patients) and those admitted for elective surgery on the day of their procedure (73.4% of 3993 patients). However, 41.1% of patients awaiting hip or knee replacement were admitted the day before surgery so did not require acute care on admission. The proportion of patients who required acute care on admission and during the subsequent hospital stay declined with age; the proportion of patients needing nonacute care did not vary with age. After admission, acute care was needed on 27.5% of subsequent days, subacute care on 40.2% and nonacute care on 32.3%. The need for acute care on admission was a predictor of need for acute care during subsequent hospital stay among patients with medical conditions. The proportion of patients requiring subacute care during the subsequent hospital stay increased with age, decreased with the number of inpatient beds in each hospital and was highest among patients with congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and pneumonia. INTERPRETATION: In 1995, inpatients requiring subacute care accounted for a substantial proportion of nonacute care days in Ontario''s general hospitals. These findings suggest a need to evaluate the efficiencies that might be achieved by introducing a subacute category of care into the Canadian health care system. Generally, efforts are needed to reduce the proportion of admissions for nonacute care and of in-hospital days for other than acute care.     

经皮椎间孔镜法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的效果观察

目的:探究经皮椎间孔镜法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的效果。方法:选择我院于2018年1月2020年3月收治的腰椎间盘突出症患者77例为研究对象,根据入院顺序经随机数字表法分成两组,给予对照组39例患者进行开放手术:腰椎后路间盘切除、椎间融合、椎弓根钉内固定术,给予研究组38例患者经皮椎间孔镜法进行治疗。对比两组治疗后腰部功能恢复情况;两组手术时间、术中出血量、住院天数、切口长度等临床指标;两组术前及术后1 d白介素-1β(Inter leukin-1β,IL-1β)及C反应蛋白(C-reactive protein,CRP)水平。结果:研究组的腰部功能恢复总优良率92.11%(35/38)显著高于对照组的腰部功能恢复总优良率66.67%(26/39)(P<0.05);研究组的术中出血量、住院天数、切口长度、手术时间均显著少(短)于对照组(P<0.05);术前,两组的IL-1β、CRP水平对比无显著性差异(P>0.05);术后1 d,两组的IL-1β、CRP水平均比术前显著升高,但研究组显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:经皮椎间孔镜法治疗腰椎间盘突出症的效果显著,可有效改善患者临床指标,且损伤较小,值得推荐至临床广泛应用。     

内固定术后股骨颈短缩的多因素分析及其对骨折的影响

目的:分析股骨颈短缩的发生率、对骨折愈合造成的影响以及造成颈短缩的影响因素。方法:选择在我院行闭合复位空心钉内固定术治疗并成功获得随访信息的老年股骨颈骨折患者106例作为研究对象。于术后1、3、6、12个月对患者进行门诊随访,记录患者的髋关节Harris评分、骨折愈合情况以及颈短缩的发生率,并将患者分为短缩组和无短缩组,对两组患者的骨折愈合率与髋关节Harris评分进行对比,并分析空心钉内固定术后颈短缩发生的危险因素。结果:短缩组43例,未短缩组63例。短缩组中骨折愈合率93.02%;未短缩组中骨折愈合率93.65%,两组骨折愈合率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。短缩组中术后髋关节Harris评分为(74.58±7.85)分;未短缩组中术后髋关节Harris评分为(85.69±11.34)分,短缩组Harris评分低于未短缩组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。颈短缩的发生与年龄、性别、骨折类型、骨密度值及骨折复位质量密切相关(P<0.05),与受伤至手术时间、置入方式、负重时间、住院时间无明显的相关性(P>0.05)。颈短缩的发生与骨密度值和骨折复位质量相关性最大,骨折类型与年龄次之,性别的相关性相对较小。结论:空心钉内固定治疗股骨颈骨折并发颈短缩的发生率较高,颈短缩会影响髋关节的功能,但不影响骨折的愈合。骨密度、骨折复位质量、骨折类型、年龄以及性别是颈短缩的独立影响因素。     

The TAPS project. 17: Readmission to hospital for long term psychiatric patients after discharge to the community.

OBJECTIVE--To identify risk factors which increase the likelihood of readmission for long stay psychiatric patients after discharge from hospital. DESIGN--Follow up for five years of all long stay patients discharged from two large psychiatric hospitals to compare patients readmitted and not readmitted. SETTING--Friern and Claybury Hospitals in north London and their surrounding catchment areas. Most patients were discharged to staffed or unstaffed group homes. SUBJECTS--357 psychiatric patients who had been in hospital for over one year, of whom 118 were "new" long stay and 239 "old" long stay patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Readmission to hospital and length of subsequent stay. RESULTS--Of all discharged patients 97 (27%) were readmitted at some time during the follow up period, 57 (16%) in the first year after discharge, and 31 (9%) then remained in hospital for over a year. The best explanatory factors for readmission were: male sex, younger age group, high number of previous admissions, higher levels of symptomatic and social behavioural disturbance, a diagnosis of manic-depressive psychosis, and living in a non-staffed group home. CONCLUSIONS--During the closure of psychiatric hospitals, facilities need to be preserved for acute relapses among long term, and especially younger, discharged patients. Staffed group homes may help prevent relapse and reduce the number of admission beds required.     

Community care for patients with schizophrenia one year after hospital discharge.

OBJECTIVES--To document the circumstances and care of patients with schizophrenia who had recently been discharged from local psychiatric inpatient services, and to establish the extent to which misgivings about community care might be justified. DESIGN--Cross sectional surveys with review of case notes. Follow up interviews with questionnaires administered one year after discharge. SETTING--Two inner London districts (West Lambeth and Lewisham) with high levels of social deprivation and at different stages of developing community services. PATIENTS--90 and 50 patients in the two services respectively, aged 18 to 65, who satisfied the Research Diagnostic Criteria for schizophrenia and who were discharged from inpatient services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Diagnosis elicited by present state examination, global social disability rating, use of services during the three months before interview. RESULTS--89 of the 140 patients (64%) had been ill for five or more years, yet few were former long stay inpatients. 55% (50/91; 95% confidence interval 45% to 65%) of those interviewed had current psychotic mental states and 22% (27/124; 16% to 31%) were functioning socially at very poor or severely maladjusted levels. 86% (107/124) were unemployed. The majority of patients had seen a mental health or social service professional, yet only 16% (20/124) were in specialised accomodation (excluding hospitals) and only 23% (17/73) of those eligible had used day care. Small numbers of people had experienced homelessness (two) or imprisonment (four over six months). CONCLUSIONS--Many schizophrenic patients leaving local psychiatric inpatient care have active symptomatology and profound social disabilities. Community care was characterised by high rates of contact with service professionals but little supported accommodation or day activity. This group of clients may require dedicated provision, which would actively encourage them to use services protected from the demands of those with less severe illness.     

Reduction in hospital readmission stay of elderly patients by a community based hospital discharge scheme: a randomised controlled trial.

STUDY OBJECTIVE--To compare a community support scheme using care attendants with standard aftercare for their effects on independence and morale of elderly patients discharged from hospital and on their use of health and social services. DESIGN--Randomised controlled study of cohort of patients over 75 discharged to their own homes. SETTING--District general hospital and community. PATIENTS--Total of 903 patients (mean age 82, 25% over 85). INTERVENTIONS--Total of 464 patients received support from care attendants on first day at home and for up to 12 hours a week for two weeks. Support comprised practical care, help with rehabilitation, and organising social help. The remaining 439 patients received standard aftercare. END POINT--Difference between two groups of 7% in hospital readmission rates or one point on activities of daily living scale (power 80%, significance level 5%). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS--Three months after the initial discharge 763 patients were interviewed (84%). There were no significant differences between the two groups in physical independence (activities of daily living scale), in measures of morale (Philadelphia scale), or in death rates. Hospital readmission rates within 18 months of discharge, however, were significantly higher in the control group and they spent more days in hospital (mean; control group 30.6 days, support group 17.1 days; p = 0.014). Of the patients living alone who were followed up for 18 months 21 (15%) receiving standard aftercare were readmitted more than twice compared with 6 (5%) supported by care attendants (p less than 0.01). CONCLUSIONS--If the findings are confirmed, and the policy extended to all patients over the age of 75 living alone, an average health district might expect either to save about 23 hospital beds at a net annual saving of about pounds 220,000 in the short term or to increase available beds by this number.     

The health and cost effects of substituting home care for inpatient acute care: a review of the evidence

BACKGROUND: There is much interest in reducing hospital stays by providing some health care services in patients'' homes. The authors review the evidence regarding the effects of this acute care at home (acute home care) on the health of patients and caregivers and on the social costs (public and private costs) of managing the patients'' health conditions. METHODS: MEDLINE and HEALTHSTAR databases were searched for articles using the key term "home care." Bibliographies of articles read were checked for additional references. Fourteen studies met the selection criteria (publication between 1975 and early 1998, evaluation of an acute home care program for adults, and use of a control group to evaluate the program). Of the 14, only 4 also satisfied 6 internal validity criteria (patients were eligible for home care, comparable patients in home care group and hospital care group, adequate patient sample size, appropriate analytical techniques, appropriate health measures and appropriate costing methods). RESULTS: The 4 studies with internal validity evaluated home care for 5 specific health conditions (hip fracture, hip replacement, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], hysterectomy and knee replacement); 2 of the studies also evaluated home care for various medical and surgical conditions combined. Compared with hospital care, home care had no notable effects on patients'' or caregivers'' health. Social costs were not reported for hip fracture. They were unaffected for hip and knee replacement, and higher for COPD and hysterectomy; in the 2 studies of various conditions combined, social costs were higher in one and lower in the other. Effects on health system costs were mixed, with overall cost savings for hip fracture and higher costs for hip and knee replacement. INTERPRETATION: The limited existing evidence indicates that, compared with hospital care, acute home care produces no notable difference in health outcomes. The effects on social and health system costs appear to vary with condition. More well-designed evaluations are needed to determine the appropriate use of acute home care.     

Quality of Care of Hospitalized Internal Medicine Patients Bedspaced to Non-Internal Medicine Inpatient Units

Background

When the number of patients requiring hospital admission exceeds the number of available department-allotted beds, patients are often placed on a different specialty''s inpatient ward, a practice known as “bedspacing”. Whether bedspacing affects quality of patient care has not been previously studied.

Methods

We reviewed consecutive general internal medicine (GIM) admissions for congestive heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and pneumonia at St. Michael''s Hospital in Toronto, Canada, from 2007 to 2011 and examined whether quality of care differs between bedspaced and nonbedspaced patients. We matched each bedspaced patient with a GIM ward patient admitted on the same call shift with the same diagnosis. The primary outcome was the ratio of the actual to the estimated length of stay (ELOS). General and disease specific measures for CHF, COPD, and pneumonia (e.g. fluid restriction) were evaluated, as well as 30-day Emergency Department (ED) and hospital readmissions.

Results

Overall, 1639 consecutive admissions were reviewed, and 39 matched pairs for CHF, COPD and pneumonia were studied. Differences in both general and disease specific care measures were not detected between groups. For many disease-specific comparisons, ordering and adherence to quality of care indicators was low in both groups.

Conclusions

We were unable to detect differences in quality of care between bedspaced and nonbedspaced patients. As high patient volumes and hospital overcrowding remains, bedspacing will likely continue. More research is required in order to determine if quality of care is compromised by this ongoing practice.