Estrogen receptor-alpha 36 mediates mitogenic antiestrogen signaling in ER-negative breast cancer cells

It is prevailingly thought that the antiestrogens tamoxifen and ICI 182, 780 are competitive antagonists of the estrogen-binding site of the estrogen receptor-alpha (ER-α). However, a plethora of evidence demonstrated both antiestrogens exhibit agonist activities in different systems such as activation of the membrane-initiated signaling pathways. The mechanisms by which antiestrogens mediate estrogen-like activities have not been fully established. Previously, a variant of ER-α, EP-α36, has been cloned and showed to mediate membrane-initiated estrogen and antiestrogen signaling in cells only expressing ER-α36. Here, we investigated the molecular mechanisms underlying the antiestrogen signaling in ER-negative breast cancer MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-436 cells that express high levels of endogenous ER-α36. We found that the effects of both 4-hydoxytamoxifen (4-OHT) and ICI 182, 780 (ICI) exhibited a non-monotonic, or biphasic dose response curve; antiestrogens at low concentrations, elicited a mitogenic signaling pathway to stimulate cell proliferation while at high concentrations, antiestrogens inhibited cell growth. Antiestrogens at l nM induced the phosphorylation of the Src-Y416 residue, an event to activate Src, while at 5 μM induced Src-Y527 phosphorylation that inactivates Src. Antiestrogens at 1 nM also induced phosphorylation of the MAPK/ERK and activated the Cyclin D1 promoter activity through the Src/EGFR/STAT5 pathways but not at 5 μM. Knock-down of ER-α36 abrogated the biphasic antiestrogen signaling in these cells. Our results thus indicated that ER-α36 mediates biphasic antiestrogen signaling in the ER-negative breast cancer cells and Src functions as a switch of antiestrogen signaling dependent on concentrations of antiestrogens through the EGFR/STAT5 pathway.     

Acetyl-CoA synthetases ACSS1 and ACSS2 are 4-hydroxytamoxifen responsive factors that promote survival in tamoxifen treated and estrogen deprived cells

Acetyl-CoA synthetases ACSS1 and ACSS2 promote conversion of acetate to acetyl-CoA for use in lipid synthesis, protein acetylation, and energy production. These enzymes are elevated in some cancers and important for cell survival under hypoxia and nutrient stress. 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) can induce metabolic changes that increase cancer cell survival. An effect of 4-OHT on expression of ACSS1 or ACSS2 has not been reported. We found ACSS1 and ACSS2 are increased by 4-OHT in estrogen receptor-α positive (ER+) breast cancer cells and 4-OHT resistant derivative cells. ERα knockdown blocked ACSS1 induction by 4-OHT but not ACSS2. 4-OHT also induced ACSS2 but not ACSS1 expression in triple negative breast cancer cells. Long-term estrogen deprivation (LTED) is a model for acquired resistance to aromatase inhibitors. We found LTED cells and tumors express elevated levels of ACSS1 and/or ACSS2 and are especially sensitive to viability loss caused by depletion of ACSS1 and ACSS2 or treatment with an ACSS2-specific inhibitor. ACSS2 inhibitor also increased toxicity in cells treated with 4-OHT. We conclude ACSS1 and ACSS2 are 4-OHT regulated factors important for breast cancer cell survival in 4-OHT-treated and long-term estrogen deprived cells.     

Autophagy facilitates the progression of ERα-positive breast cancer cells to antiestrogen resistance

A major impediment to the successful treatment of estrogen receptor α (ERα)-positive breast cancer is the development of antiestrogen resistance. Tamoxifen, the most commonly used antiestrogen, exerts its pharmacological action by binding to ERα and blocking the growth- promoting action of estrogen-bound ERα in breast cancer cells. Tamoxifen treatment primarily induces cytostasis (growth arrest) and the surviving breast cancer cells commonly acquire tamoxifen resistance. Numerous clinically-relevant mechanisms of acquired antiestrogen resistance have been identified by in vitro studies. Our recent studies (Mol Cancer Ther 2008: 7:2977-87) now demonstrate that autophagy (also referred to as macroautophagy) is critical to the development of antiestrogen resistance. Under conditions of compromised autophagy, including treatments with pharmacological inhibitors and RNAi targeting of the beclin 1 gene, the cytotoxicity (death-inducing effects) of the antiestrogen 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) was significantly increased. 4-OHT is an active metabolite of tamoxifen commonly used for in vitro studies. A step-wise drug selection protocol, using 4-OHT as the selecting drug, established antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cell lines. Analysis of a representative resistant cell line showed an increased ability of the cells to sustain high levels of antiestrogen-induced autophagy without progression to death. Importantly, blockade of autophagosome function in the 4-OHT-treated, antiestrogen-resistant cells induced a robust death response. These data provide strong evidence that autophagy is a key mechanism of cell survival during antiestrogen challenge and progression to antiestrogen resistance. We discuss the potential benefit of blocking autophagosome function to significantly reduce the emergence of antiestrogen-resistant breast cancer cells.     

Estrogen utilization of IGF-1-R and EGF-R to signal in breast cancer cells

As breast cancer cells develop secondary resistance to estrogen deprivation therapy, they increase their utilization of non-genomic signaling pathways. Our prior work demonstrated that estradiol causes an association of ERα with Shc, Src and the IGF-1-R. In cells developing resistance to estrogen deprivation (surrogate for aromatase inhibition) and to the anti-estrogens tamoxifen, 4-OH-tamoxifen, and fulvestrant, an increased association of ERα with c-Src and the EGF-R occurs. At the same time, there is a translocation of ERα out of the nucleus and into the cytoplasm and cell membrane. Blockade of c-Src with the Src kinase inhibitor, PP-2 causes relocation of ERα into the nucleus. While these changes are not identical in response to each anti-estrogen, ERα binding to the EGF-R is increased in response to 4-OH-tamoxifen when compared with tamoxifen. The changes in EGF-R interactions with ERα impart an enhanced sensitivity of tamoxifen-resistant cells to the inhibitory properties of the specific EGF-R tyrosine kinase inhibitor, AG 1478. However, with long term exposure of tamoxifen-resistant cells to AG 1478, the cells begin to re-grow but can now be inhibited by the IGF-R tyrosine kinase inhibitor, AG 1024. These data suggest that the IGF-R system becomes the predominant signaling mechanism as an adaptive response to the EGF-R inhibitor. Taken together, this information suggests that both the EGF-R and IGF-R pathways can mediate ERα signaling.To further examine the effects of fulvestrant on ERα function, we examined the acute effects of fulvestrant, on non-genomic functionality. Fulvestrant enhanced ERα association with the membrane IGF-1-receptor (IGF-1-R). Using siRNA or expression vectors to knock-down or knock-in selective proteins, we further demonstrated that the ERα/IGF-1-R association is Src-dependent. Fulvestrant rapidly induced IGF-1-R and MAPK phosphorylation. The Src inhibitor PP2 and IGF-1-R inhibitor AG1024 greatly blocked fulvestrant-induced ERα/IGF-1-R interaction leading to a further depletion of total cellular ERα induced by fulvestrant and further enhanced fulvestrant-induced cell growth arrest. More dramatic was the translocation of ERα to the plasma membrane in combination with the IGF-1-R as shown by confocal microscopy. Taken in aggregate, these studies suggest that secondary resistance to hormonal therapy results in usage of both IGF-R and EGF-R for non-genomic signaling.     

TWIST represses estrogen receptor-alpha expression by recruiting the NuRD protein complex in breast cancer cells

Loss of estrogen receptor α (ERα) expression and gain of TWIST (TWIST1) expression in breast tumors correlate with increased disease recurrence and metastasis and poor disease-free survival. However, the molecular and functional regulatory relationship between TWIST and ERα are unclear. In this study, we found TWIST was associated with a chromatin region in intron 7 of the human ESR1 gene coding for ERα. This association of TWIST efficiently recruited the nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD) repressor complex to this region, which subsequently decreased histone H3K9 acetylation, increased histone H3K9 methylation and repressed ESR1 expression in breast cancer cells. In agreement with these molecular events, TWIST expression was inversely correlated with ERα expression in both breast cancer cell lines and human breast ductal carcinomas. Forced expression of TWIST in TWIST-negative and ERα-positive breast cancer cells such as T47D and MCF-7 cells reduced ERα expression, while knockdown of TWIST in TWIST-positive and ERα-negative breast cancer cells such as MDA-MB-435 and 4T1 cells increased ERα expression. Furthermore, inhibition of histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity including the one in NuRD complex significantly increased ERα expression in MDA-MB-435 and 4T1 cells. HDAC inhibition together with TWIST knockdown did not further increase ERα expression in 4T1 and MDA-MB-435 cells. These results demonstrate that TWIST/NuRD represses ERα expression in breast cancer cells. Therefore, TWIST may serve as a potential molecular target for converting ERα-negative breast cancers to ERα-positive breast cancers, allowing these cancers to restore their sensitivity to endocrine therapy with selective ERα antagonists such as tamoxifen and raloxifene.     

Point mutation of estrogen receptor (ER) in the ligand-binding domain changes the pharmacology of antiestrogens in ER-negative breast cancer cells stably expressing complementary DNAs for ER.

The antiestrogen tamoxifen is used in the treatment of hormone-responsive breast cancer. However, therapeutic failure has frequently been observed in both patients and animal models after long term treatment. We have studied the effect of a point mutation that leads to the substitution of Val for Gly at codon 400 in the ligand-binding domain of the estrogen receptor (ER) on estrogenic and antiestrogenic activities of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) and its derivatives. Stable ER transfectants derived from MDA-MB-231 CL10A, an ER-negative breast cancer cell line, have been used in these studies. 4-OHT and its fixed ring derivatives showed more estrogen-like activity in ER transfectants than in MCF-7, an ER-positive breast cancer cell line. In this study, 4-OHT was a partial agonist of cell growth in the transfectant S30 cells, which express the wild-type ER. However, it was a full agonist in the mutant ER transfectant ML alpha 2H, which expressed ER with Val at codon 400. The increased estrogenic activity of 4-OHT in ML alpha 2H cells was not due to the preferential isomerization of trans 4-OHT to cis 4-OHT, since the nonisomerizable fixed ring trans 4-OHT was a partial agonist for cell growth in S30 cells and was a full agonist in ML alpha 2H cells. Transient transfection using a reporter plasmid containing an estrogen response element demonstrated that fixed ring trans 4-OHT had estrogenic activity in ML alpha 2H cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Phosphorylation by p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase promotes estrogen receptor α turnover and functional activity via the SCF(Skp2) proteasomal complex

The nuclear hormone receptor estrogen receptor α (ERα) mediates the actions of estrogens in target cells and is a master regulator of the gene expression and proliferative programs of breast cancer cells. The presence of ERα in breast cancer cells is crucial for the effectiveness of endocrine therapies, and its loss is a hallmark of endocrine-insensitive breast tumors. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of the cellular levels of ERα are not fully understood. Our findings reveal a unique cellular pathway involving the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38MAPK)-mediated phosphorylation of ERα at Ser-294 that specifies its turnover by the SCF(Skp2) proteasome complex. Consistently, we observed an inverse relationship between ERα and Skp2 or active p38MAPK in breast cancer cell lines and human tumors. ERα regulation by Skp2 was cell cycle stage dependent and critical for promoting the mitogenic effects of estradiol via ERα. Interestingly, by the knockdown of Skp2 or the inhibition of p38MAPK, we restored functional ERα protein levels and the control of gene expression and proliferation by estrogen and antiestrogen in ERα-negative breast cancer cells. Our findings highlight a novel pathway with therapeutic potential for restoring ERα and the responsiveness to endocrine therapy in some endocrine-insensitive ERα-negative breast cancers.     

Aromatase inhibitors and xenograft studies

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) have become the front-line choice for treatment of ER+ breast cancer. Nevertheless, although patients are responsive initially, they may acquire resistance and become unresponsive to further treatment. In addition, approximately 25% of breast cancers do not express the estrogen receptor (ERα) and consequently, are innately resistant to endocrine therapy. We have investigated the mechanisms associated with this lack of treatment response using xenograft models. We found that in cells and tumors that acquired resistance to the AI letrozole therapy, expression of the ER was reduced whereas growth factor signally was enhanced, including a marked increase in HER2 expression. Treatment with trastuzumab (HER2 antibody) resulted in a significant down-regulation of HER2 and p-MAPK as well as restoration of ERα expression. Thus, when trastuzumab was added to letrozole treatment at the time of tumor progression, there was significantly prolonged tumor suppression compared to trastuzumab or letrozole alone. This suggests that inhibition of both HER2 and ERα signaling pathways are required for overcoming resistance and restoring treatment sensitivity. ER negative tumors are innately resistant to endocrine therapy. Repression of the ERα has been found to be due to epigenetic modifications such as increased methylation and histone deacetylation. We found that entinostat (ENT), a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), activated not only expression of ERα but also aromatase in MDA-MB-231 ER-negative breast cancer cells, resulting in their ability to respond to estrogen and letrozole. Treatment with ENT in combination with letrozole significantly reduced tumor growth rate in xenografts compared to control tumors (p < 0.001). ENT plus letrozole treatment also prevented the colonization and growth of MDA-MB-231 cells in the lung with a significant reduction (p < 0.03) in both visible and microscopic foci. These results provide a strong indication for possible use of AIs in combination with HDAC inhibitors for the treatment of ER-negative breast cancer.     

Arsenic induces functional re-expression of estrogen receptor α by demethylation of DNA in estrogen receptor-negative human breast cancer

Estrogen receptor α (ERα) is a marker predictive for response of breast cancers to endocrine therapy. About 30% of breast cancers, however, are hormone- independent because of lack of ERα expression. New strategies are needed for re-expression of ERα and sensitization of ER-negative breast cancer cells to selective ER modulators. The present report shows that arsenic trioxide induces reactivated ERα, providing a target for therapy with ER antagonists. Exposure of ER-negative breast cancer cells to arsenic trioxide leads to re-expression of ERα mRNA and functional ERα protein in in vitro and in vivo. Luciferase reporter gene assays and 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)- 5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) assays show that, upon exposure to arsenic trioxide, formerly unresponsive, ER-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells become responsive to ER antagonists, 4-hydroxytamoxifen and ICI 182,780. Furthermore, methylation- specific PCR and bisulfite-sequencing PCR assays show that arsenic trioxide induces partial demethylation of the ERα promoter. A methyl donor, S-adenosylmethionine (SAM), reduces the degree of arsenic trioxide-induced re-expression of ERα and demethylation. Moreover, Western blot and ChIP assays show that arsenic trioxide represses expression of DNMT1 and DNMT3a along with partial dissociation of DNMT1 from the ERα promoter. Thus, arsenic trioxide exhibits a previously undefined function which induces re-expression ERα in ER-negative breast cancer cells through demethylation of the ERα promoter. These findings could provide important information regarding the application of therapeutic agents targeting epigenetic changes in breast cancers and potential implication of arsenic trioxide as a new drug for the treatment of ER-negative human breast cancer.     

Sonic hedgehog pathway is essential for maintenance of cancer stem-like cells in human gastric cancer

Abnormal activation of the Sonic hedgehog (SHH) pathway has been described in a wide variety of human cancers and in cancer stem cells (CSCs), however, the role of SHH pathway in gastric CSCs has not been reported. In this study, we investigated the possibility that abnormal activation of the SHH pathway maintained the characteristics of gastric CSCs. First, we identified cancer stem-like cells (CSLCs) from human gastric cancer cell lines (HGC-27, MGC-803 and MKN-45) using tumorsphere culture. Compared with adherent cells, the floating tumorsphere cells had more self-renewing capacity and chemoresistance. The cells expressing CSCs markers (CD44, CD24 and CD133) were also significantly more in tumorsphere cells than in adherent cells. More importantly, in vivo xenograft studies showed that tumors could be generated with 2×10⁴ tumorsphere cells, which was 100-fold less than those required for tumors seeding by adherent cells. Next, RT-PCR and Western blot showed that the expression levels of Ptch and Gli1 (SHH pathway target genes) were significantly higher in tumorsphere cells than in adherent cells. The results of quantitative real-time PCR were similar to those of RT-PCR and Western blot. Further analysis revealed that SHH pathway blocked by cyclopamine or 5E1 caused a higher reduction in self-renewing capacity of HGC-27 tumorsphere cells than that of adherent cells. We also found that SHH pathway blocking strongly enhanced the efficacy of chemotherapeutic drugs in HGC-27 tumorsphere cells in vitro and in vivo but had no significant effect in adherent cells. Finally, we isolated the tumorspheres from gastric cancer specimen, these cells also had chemoresistance and tumorigenic capacity, and SHH pathway maintained the gastric CSLCs characteristics of tumorsphere cells from primary tumor samples. In conclusion, our data suggested that SHH pathway was essential for maintenance of CSLCs in human gastric cancer.     

EPO-independent functional EPO receptor in breast cancer enhances estrogen receptor activity and promotes cell proliferation

The main function of Erythropoietin (EPO) and its receptor (EPOR) is the stimulation of erythropoiesis. Recombinant human EPO (rhEPO) is therefore used to treat anemia in cancer patients. However, clinical trials have indicated that rhEPO treatment might promote tumor progression and has a negative effect on patient survival. In addition, EPOR expression has been detected in several cancer forms. Using a newly produced anti-EPOR antibody that reliably detects the full-length isoform of the EPOR we show that breast cancer tissue and cells express the EPOR protein. rhEPO stimulation of cultured EPOR expressing breast cancer cells did not result in increased proliferation, overt activation of EPOR (receptor phosphorylation) or a consistent activation of canonical EPOR signaling pathway mediators such as JAK2, STAT3, STAT5, or AKT. However, EPOR knockdown experiments suggested functional EPO receptors in estrogen receptor positive (ERα⁺) breast cancer cells, as reduced EPOR expression resulted in decreased proliferation. This effect on proliferation was not seen in ERα negative cells. EPOR knockdown decreased ERα activity further supports a mechanism by which EPOR affects proliferation via ERα-mediated mechanisms. We show that EPOR protein is expressed in breast cancer cells, where it appears to promote proliferation by an EPO-independent mechanism in ERα expressing breast cancer cells.     

Estrogen receptor alpha mediated induction of the transforming growth factor alpha gene by estradiol and 4-hydroxytamoxifen in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells

The selective estrogen receptor modulator, 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-OHT) is a full agonist at the transforming growth factor (TGF) alpha gene in ER negative breast cancer cells stably transfected with ER alpha cDNA (Levenson et al., Br. J. Cancer 77 (1998) 1812-1819). E(2) and 4-OHT increase TGF alpha mRNA and protein in a concentration dependent manner. The responses to E(2) and 4-OHT are blocked by the pure antiestrogen ICI 182,780, which does not induce TGF alpha. Transfected MDA-MB-231 cells contain functional ER alpha but no ER beta function was detected. Neo transfected cells that did not express ER alpha or cells stably transfected with the DNA binding domain mutant C202R/E203V which prevents gene activation did not induce TGF alpha mRNA after either E(2) or 4-OHT treatment. An examination of the time course for either 10 nM E(2) or 1 microM 4-OHT for MDA-MB-231 cells stably transfected with cDNA for ER alpha showed increases in TGF alpha mRNA within 2 or 3 h respectively. Cells pretreated with cycloheximide (1 microg/ml) showed induced TGF alpha mRNA in response to E(2) or 4-OHT but TGF alpha mRNA induction was blocked by actinomycin D (1 microg/ml). We conclude that both E(2) and 4-OHT induce TGF alpha by direct interaction of ER alpha with DNA and that ER beta is not involved in the estrogen-like response to 4-OHT in the MDA-MB-231 cells.     

Estrogen receptor alpha is cell cycle-regulated and regulates the cell cycle in a ligand-dependent fashion

Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα) has been implicated in several cell cycle regulatory events and is an important predictive marker of disease outcome in breast cancer patients. Here, we aimed to elucidate the mechanism through which ERα influences proliferation in breast cancer cells. Our results show that ERα protein is cell cycle-regulated in human breast cancer cells and that the presence of 17-β-estradiol (E2) in the culture medium shortened the cell cycle significantly (by 4.5 hours, P < 0.05) compared with unliganded conditions. The alterations in cell cycle duration were observed in the S and G₂/M phases, whereas the G₁ phase was indistinguishable under liganded and unliganded conditions. In addition, ERα knockdown in MCF-7 cells accelerated mitotic exit, whereas transfection of ERα-negative MDA-MB-231 cells with exogenous ERα significantly shortened the S and G₂/M phases (by 9.1 hours, P < 0.05) compared with parental cells. Finally, treatment of MCF-7 cells with antiestrogens revealed that tamoxifen yields a slower cell cycle progression through the S and G₂/M phases than fulvestrant does, presumably because of the destabilizing effect of fulvestrant on ERα protein. Together, these results show that ERα modulates breast cancer cell proliferation by regulating events during the S and G₂/M phases of the cell cycle in a ligand-dependent fashion. These results provide the rationale for an effective treatment strategy that includes a cell cycle inhibitor in combination with a drug that lowers estrogen levels, such as an aromatase inhibitor, and an antiestrogen that does not result in the degradation of ERα, such as tamoxifen.