Sound reception in marine mammals depending on sound parameters and conduction pathways

The interaction of complex sounds with the body tissues of Black Sea dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) was studied by the method of instrumental conditioned reflexes with food reinforcement. The thresholds of detecting underwater acoustic signals of different frequencies for dolphin and northern fur seal (Callorhinus ursinus) were measured as a function of pulse duration under conditions of full and partial (head above water) submergence of animals into water. It was found that sound conduction through dolphin tissues was more effective than that in a northern fur seal in a wide frequency range. Presumably, the process of sound propagation in dolphin is accompanied by changes in the amplitude-frequency structure of broad-band sounds. The temporal summation in dolphin hearing was observed at all frequencies under conditions of full and partial submergence, whereas in northern fur seal it was nearly absent at a frequency of 5 kHz under the conditions of head lifting above water.     

The conduction of tonal and compound sounds through the body of a bottlenose dolphin

The peculiarities of underwater sound conduction through the body of the Black Sea bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus p.) were investigated to elucidate the mechanisms of acoustic orientation of marine mammals. By using the method of instrumental conditioned reflexes with food reinforcement, underwater hearing thresholds in the bottlenose dolphin depending on signal parameters (tonal pulses and various noises) and sound conduction pathways were measured under conditions of full and partial (with the head out of water and sound being conducted through the body tissues) submergence of the animal into water. The underwater hearing thresholds increased by 6-27 dB upon sound conduction through the body tissues (to the least extent for tonal pulses of 10 and 20 kHz). The hearing thresholds for tonal pulses and narrow-band noises were very similar both under conditions of full and partial submergence of the animal into water.     

Sound reception of marine mammales depending on parameters and sound-conducting tracks

Underwater audiograms of a northern fur seal, a Caspic seal and a dolphin aphalina were measured under conditions of full or partial (the head above the water) submergence of animals using the method of instrumental conditioned reflexes with food reinforcement. The possibility and peculiarities of sound conduction through the body of marine mammals were investigated by isolating the auricle from the medium of sound spreading (under conditions of partial submergence). By the same technique, the hearing thresholds of Caspic seal were measured in the presence of broad- and narrow-band noises with different central frequencies depending on the medium (underwater or in air) the signal and the noise masker were presented and on the sound-conducting ways (under conditions of full or partial submergence of animals). It was found that aerial and underwater sound-conducting canals of the Caspic seal were functionally connected with each other. The level of hearing masking in the Caspic seal is determined by the tracts of signal and noise conduction, by the differences in sensitivity to the signal and masker, and by their spectral structure. Apparently, the tissues of the seal body considerably change the amplitude-frequency characteristics of the sound.     

The underwater and airborne horizontal localization of sound by the northern fur seal

The accuracy of the underwater and airborne horizontal localization of different acoustic signals by the northern fur seal was investigated by the method of instrumental conditioned reflexes with food reinforcement. For pure-tone pulsed signals in the frequency range of 0.5-25 kHz the minimum angles of sound localization at 75% of correct responses corresponded to sound transducer azimuth of 6.5-7.5 degrees +/- 0.1-0.4 degrees underwater (at impulse duration of 3-90 ms) and of 3.5-5.5 degrees +/- 0.05-0.5 degrees in air (at impulse duration of 3-160 ms). The source of pulsed noise signals (of 3-ms duration) was localized with the accuracy of 3.0 degrees +/- 0.2 degrees underwater. The source of continuous (of 1-s duration) narrow band (10% of c.fr.) noise signals was localized in air with the accuracy of 2-5 degrees +/- 0.02-0.4 degrees and of continuous broad band (1-20 kHz) noise, with the accuracy of 4.5 degrees +/- 0.2 degrees.     

Localization of a sum of acoustic signals in air by the northern fur seal]

The localization of a sum of acoustic signals by two northern fur seals in air depending on sound parameters was investigated using the method of instrumental conditioned reflexes with food reinforcement. It was found that sound perception of northern fur seal proceeds by the binaural mechanism. The time/intensity interchange coefficient was 570 microseconds/dB for series of clicks (with amplitude maximum at 1 kHz) and 250 microseconds/dB for tonal impulses with a frequency of 1 kHz. With click amplitudes being equal, the number of approaches of the animal to the source of the first signal reached a 75% level at a delay of the second signal 0.07 ms (the minimum delay); with a delay of 6 ms (the maximum delay) and more, the fur seal, probably hears two separate signals. The minimum delay depended little on the duration of tonal impulses (with a frequency of 1 kHz) and was 0.3-0.7 ms; the maximum delay was 9-11 ms for tonal impulses with a duration of 3 ms and 37-40 ms with impulse duration 20 ms. The precedence effect became apparent at a greater delay for smooth fronts of impulses than for rectangular fronts.     

The localization of the sound source in the vertical plane by a bottlenose dolphin

The accuracy of localizing the underwater sound source in the vertical-plane by the bottlenose dolphin was investigated using the method of instrumental conditioned reflexes with food reinforcement. The accuracy of determining the underwater sound in the vertical plane (the full angle) was on the average: 2 - 2,5 degrees for tonal signals with frequencies of 5, 20, and 120 kHz; pulsed clicks with the central frequency of 120 kHz and the exponential forms of amplitude alteration wavefronts were localized by the dolphin with an accuracy of 1,5 degrees. Among all marine mammals examined, dolphins are characterized by the maximal exact analysis of acoustic space.     

Characterization of beam patterns of bottlenose dolphin in the transversal plane

The characteristics of the absolute auditory sensitivity of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus p.) in the transverse plane have been measured using short broad-band stimuli simulating dolphin clicks (with energy maximum at frequencies 8, 16, 30, 50 and 100 kHz). Experiments were performed using the method of conditioned reflexes with food reinforcement. It was shown that, in the frequency range of 8-30 kHz, the absolute sensitivity of dolphin hearing in any ventral and lateral directions of the transverse plane is only by 2-8 dB worse than in the nasal direction. Moreover, it is approximately by 25-30 dB better than at frequencies of 50-100 kHz. At frequencies of 8-30 kHz, a pronounced dorsoventral asymmetry has been observed. In this frequency range, it reaches approximately 15-18 dB whereas at frequencies of 50-100 kHz, this asymmetry decreases to 2-3 dB. In the dorsal direction, the auditory sensitivity is by 18 dB worse than in the nasal one at frequencies of around 8 kHz, and the difference rises smoothly to 33 dB at frequencies of about 100 kHz. At frequencies of 50-100 kHz, the acoustical thresholds of the cross-section plane in comparison with thresholds for the with nasal direction get worse almost uniformly in all directions by 25-33 dB. As a result, in the transversal plane, the beam patterns have a nearly circular form, unlike the patterns at frequencies of 8-30 kHz. The results are discussed in terms of the model of sound perception through the left and right mental foramens. The biological expediency of the asymmetry is emphasized.     

Mechanisms of sound reception and conduction in the dolphin

Morphology of the dolphin’s lower jaw, model and behavioral experiments are discussed with the aim of exploring the mechanisms of sound reception and conduction to the lower jaw canals, taking into account the known concepts of acoustics and the theory of grouped antennas. It is shown that the left and right rows of mental foramens with the respective mandibular canal and tissues of the canals are forming the new external ear and the new external auditory duct whereby sound (in the frequency band of 0.1–160 kHz) is transmitted into the middle ear, in contrast to the dolphin’s nonfunctional outer ear. This new external ear is created by nature as a receiving array of traveling-wave antennas located in the throat of an acoustic horn (the respective mandibular canal). The results give reason to assume the existence of a similar new external ear in Odontoceti.     

AUDIOMETRIC ASSESSMENT OF NORTHERN FUR SEALS, CALLORHINUS URSINUS

Aerial and underwater audiograms for two young female northern fur seals ( Callorhinus ursinus ) and one young female California sea lion (Zalophus californianus) were obtained with the same procedure and apparatus. Callorhinus hears over a larger frequency range and is more sensitive to airborne sounds than Zalophus or any other pinniped thus far tested in the frequency range of 500 Hz to 32 kHz. Sensitivity of Callorhinus to waterborne pure tones, ranging from 2 to 28 kHz, is equal or superior to all other pinnipeds tested in this same frequency range. Like Zalophus , the upper frequency limit for underwater hearing (as defined by Masterton et al. 1969) in Callorhinus is about one-half octave lower than the three phocid species thus far tested. Callorhinus' upper frequency limit in air is about 36 kHz and under water it is about 40 kHz. Comparison of air and water audiograms shows Callorhinus is no exception to previous behavioral findings demonstrating that the „pinniped ear” is more suitable for hearing in water than in air. Similar to Zalophus and Phoca vitulina, Callorhinus shows an anomalous hearing loss at 4 kHz in air. The basis for this insensitivity to airborne sounds at 4kHz and not at lower or higher frequencies is presumably caused by specialized middle ear mechanisms matching impedance for waterborne sounds. Critical ratio curves for Callorhinus are similarly shaped to ones obtained for humans but are shifted upwards in frequency. Compared to all other marine mammals thus far evaluated, the critical ratios for Callorhinus are the smallest yet reported.     

Efficiency of body conduction of underwater sounds in the bottlenose dolphin

Hearing thresholds of the Black Sea bottlenose dolphin Tursiops truncatus for tonal and composite underwater sounds within 50 kHz were ascertained in fully or partly submerged (head out of water) animals (trained by operant conditioning with food reinforcement). Perception of sounds conducted through the body deteriorated in all cases (thresholds for 75%-correct response rose typically by 6-24 dB); the least changes were observed for 10 and 20 kHz tones. The aggregate data also suggested significant individual variations.     

Characterization of beam patterns of bottlenose dolphin in the transverse plane

The characteristics of absolute auditory sensitivity of the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus) in the transverse plane have been measured using short broadband stimuli simulating dolphin clicks (with energy maximum at frequencies 8, 16, 30, 50 and 100 kHz). Experiments were performed using the method of conditioned reflexes with food reinforcement. It is shown that, in the frequency range of 8–30 kHz, the absolute sensitivity of dolphin hearing in any ventral and lateral directions of the transverse plane is only 2–8 dB worse than in the rostral direction. Moreover, it is 25–30 dB better than at 50–100 kHz. At 8–30 kHz, pronounced dorsoventral asymmetry has been observed. In this frequency range, it reaches 15–18 dB whereas at 50–100 kHz this asymmetry decreases to 2–3 dB. In the dorsal direction, the auditory sensitivity is 18 dB worse than in the rostral one at ∼8 kHz, and the difference rises smoothly to 33 dB at ∼100 kHz. At 50–100 kHz, the acoustical thresholds in the transverse plane relative to those for the with rostral direction get worse almost uniformly in all directions by 25–33 dB. As a result, in the transverse plane the beam patterns are nearly circular, unlike those at 8–30 kHz. The results are discussed in terms of the model of sound perception through the left and right mental foramens. The biological relevance of such asymmetry is emphasized.     

Tympanic and extratympanic sound transmission in the leopard frog

Summary The inner ear of the leopard frog,Rana pipiens, receives sound via two separate pathways: the tympanic-columellar pathway and an extratympanic route. The relative efficiency of the two pathways was investigated. Laser interferometry measurements of tympanic vibration induced by free-field acoustic stimulation reveal a broadly tuned response with maximal vibration at 800 and 1500 Hz. Vibrational amplitude falls off rapidly above and below these frequencies so that above 2 kHz and below 300 Hz tympanic vibration is severely reduced. Electrophysiological measurements of the thresholds of single eighth cranial nerve fibers from both the amphibian and basilar papillae in response to pure tones were made in such a way that the relative efficiency of tympanic and extratympanic transmission could be assessed for each fiber. Thresholds for the two routes are very similar up to 1.0 kHz, above which tympanic transmission eventually becomes more efficient by 15–20 dB. By varying the relative phase of the two modes of stimulation, a reduction of the eighth nerve response can be achieved. When considered together, the measurements of tympanic vibration and the measurements of tympanic and extratympanic transmission thresholds suggest that under normal conditions in this species (1) below 300 Hz extratympanic sound transmission is the main source of inner ear stimulation; (2) for most of the basilar papilla frequency range (i.e., above 1.2 kHz) tympanic transmission is more important; and (3) both routes contribute to the stimulation of amphibian papilla fibers tuned between those points. Thus acoustic excitation of the an uran's inner ear depends on a complex interac tion between tympanic and extratympanic sound transmission.Abbreviations dB SPL decibels sound pressure level re: 20 N/ m² - AP amphibian papilla - BP basilar papilla - BEF best excitatory frequency     

TEMPORARY THRESHOLD SHIFTS AFTER NOISE EXPOSURE IN THE BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN (TURSIOPS TRUNCATUS) MEASURED USING EVOKED AUDITORY POTENTIALS

The time course of recovery from temporary threshold shift (TTS) was measured in a bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus , using an evoked-potential procedure. The envelope-following response (EFR), which is a rhythmic train of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated tones, was used as an indicator of the sound reception by the animal. Variation of the intensity of the stimulus allowed us to measure the animal's hearing via EFR thresholds. During each session, following an initial measure of threshold, the trained animal voluntary positioned itself within a hoop 1 m underwater while a 160 dB re 1 μPa noise of a 4–11 kHz bandwidth was presented for 30 min. After the noise exposure, thresholds were measured again at delays of 5, 10, 15, 25, 45, and 105 min. Measurements were made at test frequencies of 8, 11.2, 16, 22.5, and 32 kHz. The maximum TTS occurred 5 min after exposure and rapidly recovered with a rate of around 1.5 dB per doubling of time. TTS occurred at test frequencies from 8 to 16 kHz, with the maximum at 16 kHz. TTS was negligible at 22.5 kHz and absent at 32 kHz.     

Cartilage Conduction Is Characterized by Vibrations of the Cartilaginous Portion of the Ear Canal

Cartilage conduction (CC) is a new form of sound transmission which is induced by a transducer being placed on the aural cartilage. Although the conventional forms of sound transmission to the cochlea are classified into air or bone conduction (AC or BC), previous study demonstrates that CC is not classified into AC or BC (Laryngoscope 124: 1214–1219). Next interesting issue is whether CC is a hybrid of AC and BC. Seven volunteers with normal hearing participated in this experiment. The threshold-shifts by water injection in the ear canal were measured. AC, BC, and CC thresholds at 0.5–4 kHz were measured in the 0%-, 40%-, and 80%-water injection conditions. In addition, CC thresholds were also measured for the 20%-, 60%-, 100%-, and overflowing-water injection conditions. The contributions of the vibrations of the cartilaginous portion were evaluated by the threshold-shifts. For AC and BC, the threshold-shifts by the water injection were 22.6–53.3 dB and within 14.9 dB at the frequency of 0.5–4 kHz, respectively. For CC, when the water was filled within the bony portion, the thresholds were elevated to the same degree as AC. When the water was additionally injected to reach the cartilaginous portion, the thresholds at 0.5 and 1 kHz dramatically decreased by 27.4 and 27.5 dB, respectively. In addition, despite blocking AC by the injected water, the CC thresholds in force level were remarkably lower than those for BC. The vibration of the cartilaginous portion contributes to the sound transmission, particularly in the low frequency range. Although the airborne sound is radiated into the ear canal in both BC and CC, the mechanism underlying its generation is different between them. CC generates airborne sound in the canal more efficiently than BC. The current findings suggest that CC is not a hybrid of AC and BC.     

Anatomy and physics of the exceptional sensitivity of dolphin hearing (Odontoceti: Cetacea)

During the past 50 years, the high acoustic sensitivity and the echolocation behavior of dolphins and other small odontocetes have been studied thoroughly. However, understanding has been scarce as to how the dolphin cochlea is stimulated by high frequency echoes, and likewise regarding the ear mechanics affecting dolphin audiograms. The characteristic impedance of mammalian soft tissues is similar to that of water, and thus no radical refractions of sound, nor reflections of sound, can be expected at the water/soft tissue interfaces. Consequently, a sound-collecting terrestrial pinna and an outer ear canal serve little purpose in underwater hearing. Additionally, compared to terrestrial mammals whose middle ear performs an impedance match from air to the cochlea, the impedance match performed by the odontocete middle ear needs to be reversed to perform an opposite match from water to the cochlea. In this paper, we discuss anatomical adaptations of dolphins: a lower jaw collecting sound, thus replacing the terrestrial outer ear pinna, and a thin and large tympanic bone plate replacing the tympanic membrane of terrestrial mammals. The paper describes the lower jaw anatomy and hypothetical middle ear mechanisms explaining both the high sensitivity and the converted acoustic impedance match.     

The effects of noise on the auditory sensitivity of the bluegill sunfish,Lepomis macrochirus

As concerns about the effects of underwater anthropogenic noises on the auditory function of organisms increases, it is imperative to assess if all organisms are equally affected by the same noise source. Consequently, auditory capabilities of an organism need to be evaluated and compared interspecifically. Teleost fishes provide excellent models to examine these issues due to their diversity of hearing capabilities. Broadly, fishes can be categorized as hearing specialists (broad hearing frequency range with low auditory thresholds) or hearing generalists (narrower frequency range with higher auditory thresholds). The goal of this study was to examine the immediate effects of white noise exposure (0.3-2.0 kHz, 142 dB re: 1 microPa) and recovery after exposure (1-6 days) on a hearing generalist fish, bluegill sunfish (Lepomis macrochirus). Noise exposure resulted in only a slight, but not statistically significant, elevation in auditory threshold compared to fish not exposed to noise. In combination with results from our previous studies examining effects of noise on a hearing specialist fish, the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas), this study provides evidence supporting the hypothesis that fish's auditory thresholds can be differentially affected by noise exposure.     

Specialization for underwater hearing by the tympanic middle ear of the turtle, Trachemys scripta elegans

Turtles, like other amphibious animals, face a trade-off between terrestrial and aquatic hearing. We used laser vibrometry and auditory brainstem responses to measure their sensitivity to vibration stimuli and to airborne versus underwater sound. Turtles are most sensitive to sound underwater, and their sensitivity depends on the large middle ear, which has a compliant tympanic disc attached to the columella. Behind the disc, the middle ear is a large air-filled cavity with a volume of approximately 0.5 ml and a resonance frequency of approximately 500 Hz underwater. Laser vibrometry measurements underwater showed peak vibrations at 500-600 Hz with a maximum of 300 μm s(-1) Pa(-1), approximately 100 times more than the surrounding water. In air, the auditory brainstem response audiogram showed a best sensitivity to sound of 300-500 Hz. Audiograms before and after removing the skin covering reveal that the cartilaginous tympanic disc shows unchanged sensitivity, indicating that the tympanic disc, and not the overlying skin, is the key sound receiver. If air and water thresholds are compared in terms of sound intensity, thresholds in water are approximately 20-30 dB lower than in air. Therefore, this tympanic ear is specialized for underwater hearing, most probably because sound-induced pulsations of the air in the middle ear cavity drive the tympanic disc.     

STRUCTURE AND FUNCTION IN WHALE EARS

ABSTRACT

Ultrasonic echolocation abilities are well documented in several dolphin species, but hearing characteristics are unknown for most whales. Vocalization data suggest whale hearing spans infra- to ultrasonic ranges. This paper presents an overview of whale ear anatomy and analyzes 1) how whale ears are adapted for underwater hearing and 2) how inner ear differences relate to different hearing capacities among whales.

Whales have adaptations for rapid, deep diving and long submersion; e.g., broad- bore Eustachian tubes, no pinnae, and no air-filled external canals, that impact sound reception. In odontocetes, two soft tissue channels conduct sound to the ear. In mysticetes, bone and soft tissue conduction are likely. The middle ear is air-filled but has an extensible mucosa. Cochlear structures are hypertrophied and vestibular components are reduced. Auditory ganglion cell densities are double land mammal averages (2000–4000/mm). Basilar membrane lengths range 20–70 mm; gradients are larger than in terrestrial mammals. Odontocetes have 20–60% bony membrane support and basal ratios >0.6, consistent with hearing >150 kHz. Mysticetes have apical ratios <0.002 and no bony lateral support, implying acute infrasonic hearing. Cochlear hypertrophy may be adaptive for high background noise. Vestibular loss is consistent with cervical fusion. Exceptionally high auditory fiber counts suggest both mysticetes and odontocetes have ears “wired” for more complex signal processing mechanisms than most land mammals.     

Evoked potential audiometry of 13 Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus gilli)

Evoked potential audiograms were measured in 13 Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus gilli) to determine the variability in hearing sensitivity and range of hearing. The auditory evoked potential system used a transducer embedded in a suction cup to deliver sinusoidal amplitude modulated tones to each dolphin through the pan region of the lower right jaw. Evoked potentials were recorded noninvasively using surface electrodes, and hearing thresholds were estimated by tracking the amplitude of the envelope following response, an evoked potential that is phase‐locked to the stimulus modulation rate. Frequencies tested ranged from 10 to 180 kHz in each animal. Variability in the range of hearing and age‐related reductions in hearing sensitivity and range of hearing were consistent with those observed in Atlantic bottlenose dolphins. Comparison of audiograms to a captive population of Atlantic bottlenose dolphins demonstrated that the Pacific bottlenose dolphins tested in this study had significantly lower thresholds at frequencies of 40 and 60–115 kHz. Differences in thresholds between the groups are unlikely to be due to methodological factors.     

Hearing in honeybees: operant conditioning and spontaneous reactions to airborne sound

Summary Airborne sound signals emitted by dancing bees (Apis mellifera) play an essential role in the bees' dance communication. It has been shown earlier that bees can learn to respond to airborne sounds in an aversive conditioning paradigm. Here we present a new training paradigm. A Y-choice situation was used to determine the frequency range and amplitude thresholds of hearing in bees. In addition, spontaneous reactions of bees to airborne sound were observed and used to determine thresholds of hearing. Both methods revealed that bees are able to detect sound frequencies up to about 500 Hz. The hearing threshold is 100–300 mm/s peak-to-peak velocity and is roughly constant over the range of detectable frequencies. The amplitude of the signals emitted in the dance language is 5 to 10 times higher, so we can conclude that bees can easily detect the dance sounds.