Properties of two isoforms of human blood platelet alpha-actinin

The structural and functional properties of the aa (2 X 97 kDa) and cc (2 X 94 kDa) isoforms of platelet alpha-actinin have been compared. Structural differences between aa and cc are revealed by their peptide maps, obtained from limited proteolysis, and by their immunological cross-reactivity. Both isoforms stimulate the Mg ATPase activity of actomyosin, bind to F-actin (high-speed sedimentation) and cross-link or gel actin filaments (low-speed sedimentation and viscometry), in a calcium-dependent manner. The study of the interaction with F-actin indicates that the binding of 1 molecule of aa or cc alpha-actinin/9-11 actin monomers is sufficient to produce maximal gelation in the presence of EGTA. CaCl2 at 0.1 mM strongly inhibits the binding of aa to F-actin and weakly that of cc, while it inhibits similarly the cross-linking of either aa or cc. The cross-linking efficiency of cc is 9, 7, 1.7 and 1.3 times higher than that of aa at 4, 20, 30 and 37 degrees C, respectively. The bb form (2 X 96 kDa), which is a proteolytic product of aa [Y. Gache et al. (1984) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 124, 877-881], behaves roughly as aa, but the calcium sensitivity of its binding to F-actin is intermediate between that of aa and cc. These results suggest that the effect of Ca2+ concentration on the binding of platelet alpha-actinin to F-actin may be partly dissociated from the effect on the cross-linking.     

The identification and characterisation of an actin-binding site in alpha-actinin by mutagenesis.

We have shown previously that the N-terminal actin-binding domain of alpha-actinin retains activity when expressed in E. coli as a fusion protein with glutathione-S-transferase. In the present study we have made a series of N- and C-terminal deletions within this domain and show that an actin-binding site is contained within residues 120-134. Amino acid substitutions within this region indicate that several highly conserved hydrophobic residues are involved in binding to F-actin. The hypothesis that the interaction between alpha-actinin and F-actin is predominantly hydrophobic in nature is supported by the observation that binding is relatively independent of salt concentration.     

Mechanics and multiple-particle tracking microheterogeneity of alpha-actinin-cross-linked actin filament networks

Cell morphology is controlled by the actin cytoskeleton organization and mechanical properties, which are regulated by the available contents in actin and actin regulatory proteins. Using rheometry and the recently developed multiple-particle tracking method, we compare the mechanical properties and microheterogeneity of actin filament networks containing the F-actin cross-linking protein alpha-actinin. The elasticity of F-actin/alpha-actinin networks increases with actin concentration more rapidly for a fixed molar ratio of actin to alpha-actinin than in the absence of alpha-actinin, for networks of fixed alpha-actinin concentration and of fixed actin concentration, but more slowly than theoretically predicted for a homogeneous cross-linked semiflexible polymer network. These rheological measurements are complemented by multiple-particle tracking of fluorescent microspheres imbedded in the networks. The distribution of the mean squared displacements of these microspheres becomes progressively more asymmetric and wider for increasing concentration in alpha-actinin and, to a lesser extent, for increasing actin concentration, which suggests that F-actin networks become progressively heterogeneous for increasing protein content. This may explain the slower-than-predicted rise in elasticity of F-actin/alpha-actinin networks. Together these in vitro results suggest that actin and alpha-actinin provides the cell with an unsuspected range of regulatory pathways to modulate its cytoskeleton's micromechanics and local organization in vivo.     

The filamentous actin cross-linking/bundling activity of mammalian formins

Formins are multidomain proteins that regulate actin filament dynamics and are defined by the formin homology 2 domain. Biochemical assays suggest that mammalian formins display actin-filament nucleation, severing, and bundling activities. Whether formins can cross-link actin filaments into viscoelastic arrays and the effectiveness of formins' bundling activity compared with that of important filamentous actin (F-actin) cross-linking/bundling proteins are unknown. Here, we used rigorous in vitro rheologic assays to deconvolve the dynamic cross-linking activity from the bundling activity of formin FRL1 and the closely related mDia1 and mDia2. In addition, we compared these formins with the canonical F-actin bundling protein fascin and cross-linking/bundling proteins alpha-actinin and filamin. We found that FRL1 and mDia2, but not mDia1, can help F-actin form highly elastic networks. FRL1 and mDia2 mediate the formation of highly elastic F-actin networks as effectively and rapidly as alpha-actinin and filamin but only past a relatively high actin-to-formin molar ratio of 50:1. Past that threshold molar ratio, the mechanical properties of F-actin/formin networks are independent of formin concentration, similar to fascin. Moreover, unlike those for alpha-actinin and filamin but similar to those for fascin, F-actin/formin networks show no strain-induced hardening. mDia1 cannot bundle F-actin but can weakly cross-link filaments at high concentrations. Point mutagenesis reveals that reducing the barbed-end binding activity of FRL1 and mDia2 greatly enhances the rate of formation of F-actin gels but does not significantly affect the mechanical properties of the resulting networks at steady state. Together, these results suggest that the mechanical behaviors of FRL1 and mDia2 are fundamentally different from those of cross-linking/bundling proteins alpha-actinin and filamin but qualitatively similar to the mechanical behavior of the bundling protein fascin, albeit with a dramatically increased (>10-fold) threshold concentration for transition to bundling, which nevertheless leads to much stiffer F-actin networks than fascin.     

Novel structures for alpha-actinin:F-actin interactions and their implications for actin-membrane attachment and tension sensing in the cytoskeleton

We have applied correspondence analysis to electron micrographs of 2-D rafts of F-actin cross-linked with alpha-actinin on a lipid monolayer to investigate alpha-actinin:F-actin binding and cross-linking. More than 8000 actin crossover repeats, each with one to five alpha-actinin molecules bound, were selected, aligned, and grouped to produce class averages of alpha-actinin cross-links with approximately 9-fold improvement in the stochastic signal-to-noise ratio. Measurements and comparative molecular models show variation in the distance separating actin-binding domains and the angle of the alpha-actinin cross-links. Rafts of F-actin and alpha-actinin formed predominantly polar 2-D arrays of actin filaments, with occasional insertion of filaments of opposite polarity. Unique to this study are the numbers of alpha-actinin molecules bound to successive crossovers on the same actin filament. These "monofilament"-bound alpha-actinin molecules may reflect a new mode of interaction for alpha-actinin, particularly in protein-dense actin-membrane attachments in focal adhesions. These results suggest that alpha-actinin is not simply a rigid spacer between actin filaments, but rather a flexible cross-linking, scaffolding, and anchoring protein. We suggest these properties of alpha-actinin may contribute to tension sensing in actin bundles.     

Evidence for functional homology in the F-actin binding domains of gelsolin and alpha-actinin: implications for the requirements of severing and capping

The F-actin binding domains of gelsolin and alpha-actinin compete for the same site on actin filaments with similar binding affinities. Both contain tandem repeats of approximately 125 amino acids, the first of which is shown to contain the actin-binding site. We have replaced the F-actin binding domain in the NH2-terminal half of gelsolin by that of alpha-actinin. The hybrid severs filaments almost as efficiently as does gelsolin or its NH2-terminal half, but unlike the latter, requires calcium ions. The hybrid binds two actin monomers and caps the barbed ends of filaments in the presence or absence of calcium. The cap produced by the hybrid binds with lower affinity than that of gelsolin and is not stable: It dissociates from filament ends with a half life of approximately 15 min. Although there is no extended sequence homology between these two different F-actin binding domains, our experiments show that they are functionally equivalent and provide new insights into the mechanism of microfilament severing.     

Investigation of the functional properties of domains of alpha-actinin

The role of domains in rabbit skeletal muscle alpha-actinin was investigated. The binding center of alpha-actinin containing F-actin is localized in the N-terminal domain, while the C-terminal domain provides for dimerization of the protein molecule. A model of structural organization of the alpha-actinin was proposed, according to which the subunits within the molecule are oriented so that the N-terminal domains localized on the opposite sides of the protein molecule form the binding centers of alpha-actinin with F-actin.     

Strain hardening of actin filament networks. Regulation by the dynamic cross-linking protein alpha-actinin

Mechanical stresses applied to the plasma membrane of an adherent cell induces strain hardening of the cytoskeleton, i.e. the elasticity of the cytoskeleton increases with its deformation. Strain hardening is thought to mediate the transduction of mechanical signals across the plasma membrane through the cytoskeleton. Here, we describe the strain dependence of a model system consisting of actin filaments (F-actin), a major component of the cytoskeleton, and the F-actin cross-linking protein alpha-actinin, which localizes along contractile stress fibers and at focal adhesions. We show that the amplitude and rate of shear deformations regulate the resilience of F-actin networks. At low temperatures, for which the lifetime of binding of alpha-actinin to F-actin is long, F-actin/alpha-actinin networks exhibit strong strain hardening at short time scales and soften at long time scales. For F-actin networks in the absence of alpha-actinin or for F-actin/alpha-actinin networks at high temperatures, strain hardening appears only at very short time scales. We propose a model of strain hardening for F-actin networks, based on both the intrinsic rigidity of F-actin and dynamic topological constraints formed by the cross-linkers located at filaments entanglements. This model offers an explanation for the origin of strain hardening observed when shear stresses are applied against the cellular membrane.     

Actin-binding proteins are conserved from slime molds to man

DNA clones encoding the actin-binding proteins alpha-actinin and severin from Dictyostelium discoideum were isolated and sequenced. Comparisons of the deduced amino acid sequences with proteins from other species showed striking similarities at distinct regions. The F-actin cross-linking molecule alpha-actinin carries two characteristic EF-hand structures highly homologous to the Ca2+-binding loops of proteins from the calmodulin superfamily. An N-terminal region that is conserved in alpha-actinin from D. discoideum and vertebrates is also related to parts of the dystrophin sequence and might represent the F-actin binding site. Severin, gelsolin, villin, and fragmin share homologous sequences that are believed to participate in the severing activity of these proteins.     

Synaptopodin, a molecule involved in the formation of the dendritic spine apparatus, is a dual actin/alpha-actinin binding protein

Synaptopodin (SYNPO) is a cytoskeletal protein that is preferentially located in mature dendritic spines, where it accumulates in the spine neck and closely associates with the spine apparatus. Formation of the spine apparatus critically depends on SYNPO. To further determine its molecular action, we screened for cellular binding partners. Using the yeast two-hybrid system and biochemical assays, SYNPO was found to associate with both F-actin and alpha-actinin. Ectopic expression of SYNPO in neuronal and non-neuronal cells induced actin aggregates, thus confirming a cytoplasmic interaction with the actin cytoskeleton. Whereas F-actin association is mediated by a central SYNPO motif, binding to alpha-actinin requires the C-terminal domain. Notably, the alpha-actinin binding domain is also essential for dendritic targeting and postsynaptic accumulation of SYNPO in primary neurons. Taken together, our data suggest that dendritic spine accumulation of SYNPO critically depends on its interaction with postsynaptic alpha-actinin and that SYNPO may regulate spine morphology, motility and function via its distinct modes of association with the actin cytoskeleton.     

The vinculin binding sites of talin and alpha-actinin are sufficient to activate vinculin

Vinculin regulates both cell-cell and cell-matrix junctions and anchors adhesion complexes to the actin cytoskeleton through its interactions with the vinculin binding sites of alpha-actinin or talin. Activation of vinculin requires a severing of the intramolecular interactions between its N- and C-terminal domains, which is necessary for vinculin to bind to F-actin; yet how this occurs in cells is not resolved. We tested the hypothesis that talin and alpha-actinin activate vinculin through their vinculin binding sites. Indeed, we show that these vinculin binding sites have a high affinity for full-length vinculin, are sufficient to sever the head-tail interactions of vinculin, and they induce conformational changes that allow vinculin to bind to F-actin. Finally, microinjection of these vinculin binding sites specifically targets vinculin in cells, disrupting its interactions with talin and alpha-actinin and disassembling focal adhesions. In their native (inactive) states the vinculin binding sites of talin and alpha-actinin are buried within helical bundles present in their central rod domains. Collectively, these results support a model where the engagement of adhesion receptors first activates talin or alpha-actinin, by provoking structural changes that allow their vinculin binding sites to swing out, which are then sufficient to bind to and activate vinculin.     

The effect of alpha-actinin on the length distribution of F-actin

Actin filament length distribution in cells is often regulated to fit specific tasks. In comparison to the well-studied regulation of the average filament length (e.g., using capping proteins), controlling the width of the distribution is less well understood. We utilize two complementary methods to measure the effect of alpha-actinin on the width of the distribution of lengths of F-actin in vitro. Analyzing transmission electron micrographs shows that crosslinking by alpha-actinin reduces the width of the length distribution of F-actin, decreasing the coefficient of variation by two- to threefold. Analysis of fluorescence data from depolymerization assays confirms this observation. We suggest a mechanistic molecular model in which a local (weak) stabilization of crosslinked monomers in the filament is the physical origin of the decrease in the variance of lengths. Although alpha-actinin is known to bind reversibly to F-actin, our model shows that even weak binding can produce this effect, and that in fact it persists throughout a wide range of binding strengths.     

Bundling of actin filaments by alpha-actinin depends on its molecular length

Cross-linking of actin filaments (F-actin) into bundles and networks was investigated with three different isoforms of the dumbbell-shaped alpha-actinin homodimer under identical reaction conditions. These were isolated from chicken gizzard smooth muscle, Acanthamoeba, and Dictyostelium, respectively. Examination in the electron microscope revealed that each isoform was able to cross-link F-actin into networks. In addition, F-actin bundles were obtained with chicken gizzard and Acanthamoeba alpha-actinin, but not Dictyostelium alpha-actinin under conditions where actin by itself polymerized into disperse filaments. This F-actin bundle formation critically depended on the proper molar ratio of alpha-actinin to actin, and hence F-actin bundles immediately disappeared when free alpha-actinin was withdrawn from the surrounding medium. The apparent dissociation constants (Kds) at half-saturation of the actin binding sites were 0.4 microM at 22 degrees C and 1.2 microM at 37 degrees C for chicken gizzard, and 2.7 microM at 22 degrees C for both Acanthamoeba and Dictyostelium alpha-actinin. Chicken gizzard and Dictyostelium alpha-actinin predominantly cross-linked actin filaments in an antiparallel fashion, whereas Acanthamoeba alpha-actinin cross-linked actin filaments preferentially in a parallel fashion. The average molecular length of free alpha-actinin was 37 nm for glycerol-sprayed/rotary metal-shadowed and 35 nm for negatively stained chicken gizzard; 46 and 44 nm, respectively, for Acanthamoeba; and 34 and 31 nm, respectively, for Dictyostelium alpha-actinin. In negatively stained preparations we also evaluated the average molecular length of alpha-actinin when bound to actin filaments: 36 nm for chicken gizzard and 35 nm for Acanthamoeba alpha-actinin, a molecular length roughly coinciding with the crossover repeat of the two-stranded F-actin helix (i.e., 36 nm), but only 28 nm for Dictyostelium alpha-actinin. Furthermore, the minimal spacing between cross-linking alpha-actinin molecules along actin filaments was close to 36 nm for both smooth muscle and Acanthamoeba alpha-actinin, but only 31 nm for Dictyostelium alpha-actinin. This observation suggests that the molecular length of the alpha-actinin homodimer may determine its spacing along the actin filament, and hence F-actin bundle formation may require "tight" (i.e., one molecule after the other) and "untwisted" (i.e., the long axis of the molecule being parallel to the actin filament axis) packing of alpha-actinin molecules along the actin filaments.     

Analysis of the actin-binding domain of alpha-actinin by mutagenesis and demonstration that dystrophin contains a functionally homologous domain

To define the actin-binding site within the NH2-terminal domain (residues 1-245) of chick smooth muscle alpha-actinin, we expressed a series of alpha-actinin deletion mutants in monkey Cos cells. Mutant alpha-actinins in which residues 2-19, 217-242, and 196-242 were deleted still retained the ability to target to actin filaments and filament ends, suggesting that the actin-binding site is located within residues 20-195. When a truncated alpha-actinin (residues 1-290) was expressed in Cos cells, the protein localized exclusively to filament ends. This activity was retained by a deletion mutant lacking residues 196-242, confirming that these are not essential for actin binding. The actin-binding site in alpha-actinin was further defined by expressing both wild-type and mutant actin-binding domains as fusion proteins in E. coli. Analysis of the ability of such proteins to bind to F-actin in vitro showed that the binding site was located between residues 108 and 189. Using both in vivo and in vitro assays, we have also shown that the sequence KTFT, which is conserved in several members of the alpha-actinin family of actin-binding proteins (residues 36-39 in the chick smooth muscle protein) is not essential for actin binding. Finally, we have established that the NH2-terminal domain of dystrophin is functionally as well as structurally homologous to that in alpha-actinin. Thus, a chimeric protein containing the NH2-terminal region of dystrophin (residues 1-233) fused to alpha-actinin residues 244-888 localized to actin-containing structures when expressed in Cos cells. Furthermore, an E. coli-expressed fusion protein containing dystrophin residues 1-233 was able to bind to F-actin in vitro.     

Molecular properties and functions in vitro of chicken smooth-muscle alpha-actinin in comparison with those of striated-muscle alpha-actinins

alpha-Actinin purified from chicken gizzard smooth muscle was characterized in comparison with alpha-actinins from chicken striated muscles, or fast-skeletal muscle, slow-skeletal muscle, and cardiac muscle. The gizzard alpha-actinin molecule consisted of two apparently identical subunits with a molecular weight of 100,000 on SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, as do striated-muscle alpha-actinins. Its isoelectric points in the presence of urea were similar to the striated-muscle counterparts. Despite these similarities, distinctive amino acid sequences between smooth-muscle alpha-actinin and striated-muscle alpha-actinins were revealed by peptide mapping using limited proteolysis in SDS. Gizzard alpha-actinin was immunologically distinguished from striated-muscle alpha-actinins. Gizzard alpha-actinin formed bundles of gizzard F-actin as well as of skeletal-muscle F-actin, but could not form any cross-bridges between adjacent actin filaments under conditions where skeletal-muscle alpha-actinin could. Temperature-dependent competition between gizzard alpha-actinin and tropomyosin on binding to gizzard thin filaments was demonstrated by electron microscopic observations. Gizzard alpha-actinin promoted Mg2+-ATPase activity of reconstituted skeletal actomyosin, gizzard acto-skeletal myosin, and gizzard actomyosin. This promoting effect was depressed by the addition of gizzard tropomyosin. These findings imply that, despite structural differences between gizzard and striated-muscle alpha-actinin molecules, they function similarly in vitro, and that gizzard alpha-actinin can interact not only with smooth-muscle actin (gamma- and beta-actin) but also with skeletal-muscle actin (alpha-actin).     

The molecular mobility of alpha-actinin and actin in a reconstituted model of gelation

Dictyostelium discoideum alpha-actinin (D.d. alpha-actinin) is a calcium and pH-regulated actin-binding protein that can cross-link F-actin into a gel at a submicromolar free calcium concentration and a pH less than 7 [Fechheimer, et al., 1982]. We examined mixtures of actin and D.d. alpha-actinin at four pH and calcium concentrations that exhibited various degrees of gelation or solation. The macroscopic viscosities of these mixtures were measured by falling ball viscometry (FBV) and compared to the translational diffusion coefficients measured by gaussian spot and periodic-pattern fluorescence photobleaching recovery (FPR) of both the actin filaments and D.d. alpha-actinin. A homogeneous, macroscopic gel was not composed of a static actin network. Instead, the filament diffusion coefficient decreased to approximately 65% of the control value. If the D.d. alpha-actinin concentration was increased, the solution became inhomogeneous, consisting of domains of higher actin concentration. These domains were often composed of a static actin network. The mobility of D.d. alpha-actinin consisted of a major fraction that freely diffused and a minor fraction that appeared immobile under the conditions employed. This suggested that D.d. alpha-actinin binding to the actin filaments was static over the time course of measurement (approximately 5 sec). Under solation conditions, there was no apparent interaction of actin with D.d. alpha-actinin. These results demonstrate that 1) actin filaments need not be cross-linked into an immobile, static array in order to have macroscopic properties of a gel; 2) interpretation of the rheological properties of actin:alpha-actinin gels are complicated by spatial heterogeneity of the filament concentration and mobility; and 3) a fraction of D.d. alpha-actinin binds statically to actin in undisturbed gels. The implications of these results are discussed in relation to cytoplasmic structure and contractility.     

Rabphilin localizes with the cell actin cytoskeleton and stimulates association of granules with F-actin cross-linked by {alpha}-actinin

In endocrine cell, granules accumulate within an F-actin-rich region below the plasma membrane. The mechanisms involved in this process are largely unknown. Rabphilin is a cytosolic protein that is expressed in neurons and neuroendocrine cells and binds with high affinity to members of the Rab3 family of GTPases localized to synaptic vesicles and dense core granules. Rabphilin also interacts with alpha-actinin, a protein that cross-links F-actin into bundles and networks and associates with the granule membrane. Here we asked whether rabphilin, in addition to its granule localization, also interacts with the cell actin cytoskeleton. Immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy show that rabphilin localizes to the sub-plasmalemmal actin cytoskeleton both in neuroendocrine and unspecialized cells. By using purified components, it is found that association of rabphilin with F-actin is dependent on added alpha-actinin. In an in vitro assay, granules, unlike endosomes or mitochondria, associate with F-actin cross-linked by alpha-actinin. Rabphilin is shown to stimulate this process. Rabphilin enhances by approximately 8-fold the granule ability to localize within regions of elevated concentration of cross-linked F-actin. These results suggest that rabphilin, by interacting with alpha-actinin, organizes the cell cytoskeleton to facilitate granule localization within F-actin-rich regions.     

Studies on the interaction between actin and cofilin purified by a new method.

Cofilin is a 21,000-Mr actin-binding protein that widely exists in mammalian tissues. (1) A new purification procedure for porcine brain cofilin has been developed that involves (NH4)2SO4 fractionation and sequential chromatographies on Toyo Pearl and butyl-Toyo Pearl hydrophobic columns, hydroxyapatite, phosphocellulose and Sephadex G-75 gel-filtration columns. The purified cofilin bound to F-actin and increased the amount of G-actin to a limited extent, as previously reported [Nishida, Maekawa & Sakai (1984) Biochemistry 23, 5307-5313]. (2) The binding of cofilin to F-actin was scarcely affected by Mg2+, Ca2+ or by calmodulin. However, the binding was diminished by increasing concentrations of KCl, but was only slightly affected by temperature. (3) Cofilin and either alpha-actinin or filamin could bind to F-actin simultaneously with some competition, but the binding of caldesmon to F-actin was markedly inhibited by cofilin. Phalloidin inhibited the binding of cofilin to F-actin, and protected F-actin from depolymerization by cofilin.     

The Ca(2+)-binding domains in non-muscle type alpha-actinin: biochemical and genetic analysis

Dictyostelium alpha-actinin is a Ca(2+)-regulated F-actin cross-linking protein. To test the inhibitory function of the two EF hands, point mutations were introduced into either one or both Ca(2+)-binding sites. After mutations, the two EF hands were distinguishable with respect to their regulatory activities. Inactivation of EF hand I abolished completely the F-actin cross-linking activity of Dictyostelium discoideum alpha-actinin but Ca2+ binding by EF hand II was still observed in a 45Ca2+ overlay assay. In contrast, after mutation of EF hand II the molecule was still active and inhibited by Ca2+; however, approximately 500-fold more Ca2+ was necessary for inhibition and 45Ca2+ binding could not be detected in the overlay assay. These data indicate that EF hand I has a low affinity for Ca2+ and EF hand II a high affinity, implying a regulatory function of EF hand I in the inhibition of F-actin cross-linking activity. Biochemical data is presented which allows us to distinguish two functions of the EF hand domains in D. discoideum alpha-actinin: (a) at the level of the EF- hands, the Ca(2+)-binding affinity of EF hand I was increased by EF hand II in a cooperative manner, and (b) at the level of the two subunits, the EF hands acted as an on/off switch for actin-binding in the neighboring subunit. To corroborate in vitro observations in an in vivo system we tried to rescue the abnormal phenotype of a mutant (Witke, W., M. Schleicher, A. A. Noegel. 1992. Cell. 68:53-62) by introducing the mutated alpha-actinin cDNAs. In agreement with the biochemical data, only the molecule modified in EF hand II could rescue the abnormal phenotype. Considering the fact that the active construct is "always on" because it requires nonphysiological, high Ca2+ concentrations for inactivation, it is interesting to note that an unregulated alpha-actinin was able to rescue the mutant phenotype.     

Micromechanics and ultrastructure of actin filament networks crosslinked by human fascin: a comparison with alpha-actinin.

Fascin is an actin crosslinking protein that organizes actin filaments into tightly packed bundles believed to mediate the formation of cellular protrusions and to provide mechanical support to stress fibers. Using quantitative rheological methods, we studied the evolution of the mechanical behavior of filamentous actin (F-actin) networks assembled in the presence of human fascin. The mechanical properties of F-actin/fascin networks were directly compared with those formed by alpha-actinin, a prototypical actin filament crosslinking/bundling protein. Gelation of F-actin networks in the presence of fascin (fascin to actin molar ratio >1:50) exhibits a non-monotonic behavior characterized by a burst of elasticity followed by a slow decline over time. Moreover, the rate of gelation shows a non-monotonic dependence on fascin concentration. In contrast, alpha-actinin increased the F-actin network elasticity and the rate of gelation monotonically. Time-resolved multiple-angle light scattering and confocal and electron microscopies suggest that this unique behavior is due to competition between fascin-mediated crosslinking and side-branching of actin filaments and bundles, on the one hand, and delayed actin assembly and enhanced network micro-heterogeneity, on the other hand. The behavior of F-actin/fascin solutions under oscillatory shear of different frequencies, which mimics the cell's response to forces applied at different rates, supports a key role for fascin-mediated F-actin side-branching. F-actin side-branching promotes the formation of interconnected networks, which completely inhibits the motion of actin filaments and bundles. Our results therefore show that despite sharing seemingly similar F-actin crosslinking/bundling activity, alpha-actinin and fascin display completely different mechanical behavior. When viewed in the context of recent microrheological measurements in living cells, these results provide the basis for understanding the synergy between multiple crosslinking proteins, and in particular the complementary mechanical roles of fascin and alpha-actinin in vivo.