回肠代膀胱术与改良Mainz Ⅱ式尿流改道术临床疗效比较

目的:评价回肠代膀胱术与改良MainzⅡ式尿流改道术的临床疗效。方法:对64例膀胱全切术后采用回肠代膀胱术与改良MainzⅡ式尿流改道术,术后对患者控尿,贮尿囊容积、内压,影像学及血生化资料进行比较。结果:回肠代膀胱组49例患者,术后白天控尿良好者44例,夜间控尿良好者42例,容量300-460ml。充盈压12-18cm H_2O。改良MainzⅡ式组15例患者术后白天控尿良好者15例,容量310-500ml。充盈压13-16cmH_2O。结论:两种术式术后疗效均良好。回肠代膀胱生活质量更高,值得优先采用。     

琥珀酸索利那新对女性膀胱活跃症患者P2X3受体表达的影响

目的:探讨琥珀酸索利那新对女性膀胱活跃症患者的治疗效果及对膀胱内P2X3受体的表达的影响。方法:选取我院收治的女性膀胱活跃症患者76例,随机分为两组,对照组38例,予托特罗定2 mg,早晚日2次口服;实验组38例,予琥珀酸索利那新5mg,日1次口服,2周为1个疗程,治疗2个疗程。比较两组患者的24 h排尿次数和尿急次数情况,初始尿意容量、最大尿流率、最大膀胱压容量的变化,以及膀胱内P2X3受体的表达情况。结果:治疗前两组患者尿急次数、排尿次数、尿意容量、最大尿流率及最大膀胱压容量无统计学差异,P0.05;治疗后,患者尿急次数及排尿次数降低,尿意容量、最大尿流率、最大膀胱压容量升高,与对照组比较,实验组改善更明显,差异具有统计学意义,P0.05。P2X3受体主要表达于膀胱黏膜层和黏膜下层,染色为棕黄色或金黄色;实验组P2X3表达低于正常组,差异具有统计学意义,P0.05。结论:琥珀酸索利那新能够缓解女性膀胱活跃症患者临床症状,其治疗机制可能为抑制了P2X3受体的表达。     

臭氧水膀胱腔内灌注治疗女性膀胱过度活动症疗效评价*

目的:评价臭氧水膀胱腔内灌注疗法对膀胱过度活动症的有效性和安全性。方法:2016年1月至2016年12月间共60例患者入组,所有患者均行尿流动力学检查证实膀胱逼尿肌不稳定。患者被随机分入治疗组(n=30)和对照组(n=30),对照组采用行为训练疗法并口服索利那新治疗。治疗组在行为训练疗法于口服索利那新的基础上,同时行臭氧水膀胱腔内灌注治疗。在治疗结束时通过患者病情改善情况评价疗效,主要评价指标包括:治疗前、后的患者24h排尿次数、平均夜尿次数、24h尿失禁次数、OABSS评分、I-QOL评分、治疗前和治疗结束末4周复查尿流动力学检查评估,并评估患者的不良反应。获得的数据采用t检验进行统计学分析。结果:结果证实,在24h排尿次数、平均夜尿次数、OABSS评分和I-QOL评分方面,各组治疗后有改善,而臭氧治疗组改善情况优于对照组(P0.05)。尿流动力学检查证实所有治疗后患者逼尿肌不稳定情况均有改善;初始尿意时膀胱容量、最大膀胱容量、储尿期膀胱逼尿肌最大压力变化情况治疗组改善优于对照组。不良反应由患者自主报告,治疗组主要表现为灌注后尿道内及下腹部不适感,多自主恢复,两组间差异不明显(P0.05)。结论:臭氧水膀胱腔内灌注治疗女性膀胱过度活动症安全、有效,能改善膀胱过度活动症患者排尿次数、夜尿次数和24小时尿失禁次数,能改善OABSS评分,能改善尿流动力学结果,提高患者的生活质量。     

低频电刺激联合间歇导尿及Motomed运动训练对脊髓损伤致神经源性膀胱患者膀胱内压力及膀胱容量的影响

目的:探讨低频电刺激联合间歇导尿及Motomed运动训练对脊髓损伤致神经源性膀胱患者膀胱内压力及膀胱容量的影响。方法:选取我院2015年12月～2018年2月收治的脊髓损伤致神经源性膀胱患者92例,根据随机数字表法将其分为对照组(n=46)与研究组(n=46)。两组均给予间歇性导尿、盆底肌训练、膀胱功能训练等常规干预,对照组在此基础上采取低频电刺激,研究组于对照组基础上采取Motomed运动训练,两组均干预2个月。比较两组的临床疗效、治疗前及治疗2个月后的排尿情况(日均单次排尿量、日单次最大排尿量、日均排尿次数)、尿动力学情况(最大尿流率、膀胱容量、残余尿量、膀胱内压力)、LUTS(国际下尿路症状评分)及USDS(泌尿症状困扰评分)。结果:治疗后,研究组总有效率(93.48%)显著高于对照组(78.26%)(P0.05);治疗2个月后,两组日均单次排尿量、日单次最大排尿量、日均排尿次数、最大尿流率、膀胱容量、膀胱内压力均较治疗前显著增多,且研究组以上指标均明显高于对照组(P0.05);两组LUTS及USDS分值均较治疗前显著降低,且研究组以上指标均显著低于对照组(P0.05)。结论:间歇导尿联合低频电刺激与Motomed运动训练可有效改善脊髓损伤致神经源性膀胱患者尿动力学状态及排尿情况,增大膀胱容量及膀胱内压力等,缓解下尿路症状及泌尿症状困扰程度,提高治疗效果。     

速尿在肾绞痛患者B超检查中的应用

目的 探讨静脉推注速尿在肾绞痛患者B超检查中的应用.方法对78例肾绞痛患者静脉推注速尿10~20 mg,15~20 min膀胱充盈后行B超检查.结果 78例患者全部膀胱充盈,适合行B超检查,均能清晰显示结石的部位、大小.结论 肾绞痛患者静脉推注速尿能在短时间内充盈膀胱,协助明确诊断,且使用简单、方便、安全,具有一定的临...     

大鼠脑胆碱能系统对血量扩张引起利尿与尿钠排泄的作用

本工作在清醒大鼠侧脑室注射胆碱能药物,观察脑胆碱能系统对血量扩张引起利尿与尿钠排泄的作用。侧脑室注射人工脑脊液后进行血量扩张引起尿流量、排钠量和排钾量显著增加(P<0.01)。侧脑室注射胆碱能 M 受体阻断剂阿托品后,血量扩张引起尿流量、排钠量和排钾量增加的效应比注射人工脑脊液组的均显著减弱(P<0.01);而侧脑室注射胆碱能 N 受体阻断剂六烃季胺后,血量扩张引起尿流量、排钠量和排钾量增加的效应与注射人工脑脊液组的相比无显著差异(P>0.05)。侧脑室注射人工脑脊液或阿托品大鼠的肾小球滤过率(GFR)与肾血浆流量(RPF)在血量扩张后均无显著变化(P>0.05)。上述结果表明:大鼠脑胆碱能M 受体参与血量扩张引起利尿与尿钠排泄反应的调节。脑 M 受体的这种作用不是通过改变GFR 和 RPF,而可能是通过未明神经液递机制直接影响肾小管对水钠的重吸收。     

尿源干细胞对神经源性膀胱大鼠膀胱功能及Notch1、Jagged1蛋白表达的影响

目的:研究尿源干细胞对神经源性膀胱大鼠膀胱功能及Notch1、Jagged1蛋白表达的影响。方法:纳入60只健康雌性清洁SD大鼠作为实验对象,将其按照随机抽签法分为正常对照组、研究组以及损伤组,每组各20只。其中研究组和损伤组大鼠均建立神经源性膀胱模型,研究组在造模成功后予以尿源性干细胞尾静脉注射。28 d后,比较三组大鼠膀胱功能相关指标水平,膀胱湿质量和膀胱湿质量/体质量,Notch1、Jagged1蛋白表达水平。结果:损伤组收缩时间、排尿量、膀胱峰压均低于正常对照组,而研究组收缩时间、排尿量、膀胱峰压均高于损伤组(均P0.05);损伤组膀胱基压高于正常对照组,而研究组膀胱基压低于损伤组(均P0.05)。损伤组膀胱湿质量和膀胱湿质量/体质量均高于正常对照组,而研究组膀胱湿质量和膀胱湿质量/体质量低于损伤组(均P0.05)。损伤组Notch1、Jagged1蛋白表达水平均高于正常对照组,而研究组Notch1、Jagged1蛋白表达水平低于损伤组(均P0.05)。结论:尿源干细胞的应用可显著改善神经源性膀胱大鼠膀胱功能,同时可下调Notch1、Jagged1蛋白表达水平。     

帕金森病的尿动力学表现及临床意义

为了评估有持久膀胱排尿障碍的帕金森氏病患者的尿动力学表现及其临床意义,对25例帕金森氏病患者行尿动力检查,并要求记录并回收24小时排尿日记.结果显示,1)有18例患者出现膀胱过度活动,逼尿肌收缩力低下或无反射4例,膀胱出口梗阻6例,另3例检查结果正常,无一例出现逼尿肌-括约肌协同失调; 2)患者所返回的排尿日记显示帕金森氏病患者普遍出现日排尿次数增加及每次排尿量的减少.由此可以得出结论:逼尿肌反射亢进是帕金森氏病患者尿动力学检查的最常见类型;尿动力学检查对正确处理帕金森氏病患者的排尿障碍有指导意义.     

腹腔镜根治性膀胱全切除联合回肠原位新膀胱术对膀胱癌患者免疫功能和生活质量的影响

目的:探讨腹腔镜根治性膀胱全切除联合回肠原位新膀胱术对膀胱癌患者免疫功能和生活质量的影响。方法:选取2016年7月到2017年8月在我院进行治疗的膀胱癌患者90例,患者均采用根治性膀胱全切除联合回肠原位新膀胱术治疗,其中50例行开放性根治性膀胱全切除联合回肠原位新膀胱术,作为对照组;40例行腹腔镜根治性膀胱全切除联合回肠原位新膀胱术,作为观察组。记录患者围手术期指标及并发症,比较两组患者的尿动力学指标和免疫功能变化情况以及SF-36量表评分。结果:观察组患者的手术时间长于对照组,术中出血量、住院时间、胃肠功能恢复时间均短于对照组(P<0.05)。两组患者的膀胱容量、最大尿流率、充盈期膀胱压力、排尿时最大膀胱压、最大尿道压、残留尿量和总并发症发生率比较无差异(P>0.05)。术后3 d,两组患者的CD3^+、CD4^+、CD4^+/CD8^+水平均有所下降,CD8^+水平有所上升(P<0.05),且观察组的CD3^+、CD4^+、CD4^+/CD8^+水平高于对照组,CD8^+水平低于对照组(P<0.05)。术后1个月两组患者的生理职能、生理机能、健康状况、躯体疼痛、社会功能、精力、情感职能以及精神健康评分均有增加(P<0.05),且观察组的生理职能、健康状况、精力、情感职能以及精神健康评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:与开放手术相比,腹腔镜根治性膀胱全切除联合回肠原位新膀胱术手术时间更长,但术中出血量少,患者术后恢复快,且手术对患者的免疫功能影响较小,可显著提升患者的生活质量。     

尿道内口周围的环行平滑肌称为“尿道括约肌”,对吗?

答:把尿道内口周围的球行平滑肌称为“尿道括约肌”是不准确的。首先,这种称谓太笼统。因为尿道括约肌分尿道内括约肌和尿道外括约肌,这两种括约肌的结构和功能有所不同,神经支配也不一样。尿道内括约肌有内括约肌、膀胱内括约肌和膀胱括约肌多种名称。尿道内括约肌由膀胱壁的肌层构成。膀胱壁的肌层由平滑肌组成,有内纵、中环、外纵三层。中环层肌在尿道内口处形成膀胱内括约肌(平滑肌),其收缩和舒张有抑尿和排尿的功能。排尿反射的初级中枢在腰骶部脊髓。尿道内括约肌受盆神经(副交感神经)和腹下神经(交感神经)的支配。盆神经兴奋时,可使膀胱逼尿肌收缩,尿道内括约肌松弛,因而促成排尿。腹下神经兴奋时,则使膀胱逼尿肌松弛,尿道内括约肌收缩,抑制尿的排放。尿道内括约肌的抑尿和排尿作用不受意识控制。尿道外括约肌有外括约肌、尿道膜部括约肌等名称,男女有别。女     

On the origin of the Hirudinea and the demise of the Oligochaeta

The phylogenetic relationships of the Clitellata were investigated with a data set of published and new complete 18S rRNA gene sequences of 51 species representing 41 families. Sequences were aligned on the basis of a secondary structure model and analysed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood. In contrast to the latter method, parsimony did not recover the monophyly of Clitellata. However, a close scrutiny of the data suggested a spurious attraction between some polychaetes and clitellates. As a rule, molecular trees are closely aligned with morphology-based phylogenies. Acanthobdellida and Euhirudinea were reconciled in their traditional Hirudinea clade and were included in the Oligochaeta with the Branchiobdellida via the Lumbriculidae as a possible link between the two assemblages. While the 18S gene yielded a meaningful historical signal for determining relationships within clitellates, the exact position of Hirudinea and Branchiobdellida within oligochaetes remained unresolved. The lack of phylogenetic signal is interpreted as evidence for a rapid radiation of these taxa. The placement of Clitellata within the Polychaeta remained unresolved. The biological reality of polytomies within annelids is suggested and supports the hypothesis of an extremely ancient radiation of polychaetes and emergence of clitellates.     

On the ontogeny of the haptor and the evolution of the Monogenea

Data on the ontogeny of the posterior haptor of monogeneans were obtained from more than 150 publications and summarised. These data were plotted into diagrams showing evolutionary capacity levels based on the theory of a progressive evolution of marginal hooks, anchors and other attachment components of the posterior haptor in the Monogenea (Malmberg, 1986). 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks are assumed to be the most primitive monogenean haptoral condition. Thus the diagrams were founded on a 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hook evolutionary capacity level, and the evolutionary capacity levels of anchors and other haptoral attachement components were arranged according to haptoral ontogenetical sequences. In the final plotting diagram data on hosts, type of spermatozoa, oncomiracidial ciliation, sensilla pattern and protonephridial systems were also included. In this way a number of correlations were revealed. Thus, for example, the number of 5 + 5 marginal hooks correlates with the most primitive monogenean type of spermatozoon and with few sensillae, many ciliated cells and a simple protonephridial system in the oncomiracidium. On the basis of the reviewed data it is concluded that the ancient monogeneans with 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks were divided into two main lines, one retaining unhinged marginal hooks and the other evolving hinged marginal hooks. Both main lines have recent representatives at different marginal hook evolutionary capacity levels, i.e. monogeneans retaining a haptor with only marginal hooks. For the main line with hinged marginal hooks the name Articulon-choinea n. subclass is proposed. Members with 8 + 8 hinged marginal hooks only are here called Proanchorea n. superord. Monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks only are here called Ananchorea n. superord. and three new families are erected for its recent members: Anonchohapteridae n. fam., Acolpentronidae n. fam. and Anacanthoridae n. fam. (with 7 + 7, 8 + 8 and 9 + 9 unhinged marginal hooks, respectively). Except for the families of Articulonchoinea (e.g. Acanthocotylidae, Gyrodactylidae, Tetraonchoididae) Bychowsky's (1957) division of the Monogenea into the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea fits the proposed scheme, i.e. monogeneans with unhinged marginal hooks form one old group, the Oligonchoinea, which have 5 + 5 unhinged marginal hooks, and the other group form the Polyonchoinea, which (with the exception of the Hexabothriidae) has a greater number (7 + 7, 8 + 8 or 9 + 9) of unhinged marginal hooks. It is proposed that both these names, Oligonchoinea (sensu mihi) and Polyonchoinea (sensu mihi), will be retained on one side and Articulonchoinea placed on the other side, which reflects the early monogenean evolution. Except for the members of Ananchorea [Polyonchoinea], all members of the Oligonchoinea and Polyonchoinea have anchors, which imply that they are further evolved, i.e. have passed the 5 + 5 marginal hook evolutionary capacity level (Malmberg, 1986). There are two main types of anchors in the Monogenea: haptoral anchors, with anlages appearing in the haptor, and peduncular anchors, with anlages in the peduncle. There are two types of haptoral anchors: peripheral haptoral anchors, ontogenetically the oldest, and central haptoral anchors. Peduncular anchors, in turn, are ontogenetically younger than peripheral haptoral anchors. There may be two pairs of peduncular anchors: medial peduncular anchors, ontogentically the oldest, and lateral peduncular anchors. Only peduncular (not haptoral) anchors have anchor bars. Monogeneans with haptoral anchors are here called Mediohaptanchorea n. superord. and Laterohaptanchorea n. superord. or haptanchoreans. All oligonchoineans and the oldest polyonchoineans are haptanchoreans. Certain members of Calceostomatidae [Polyonchoinea] are the only monogeneans with both (peripheral) haptoral and peduncular anchors (one pair). These monogeneans are here called Mixanchorea n. superord. Polyonchoineans with peduncular anchors and unhinged marginal hooks are here called the Pedunculanchorea n. superord. The most primitive pedunculanchoreans have only one pair of peduncular anchors with an anchor bar, while the most advanced have both medial and lateral peduncular anchors; each pair having an anchor bar. Certain families of the Articulonchoinea, the Anchorea n. superord., also have peduncular anchors (parallel evolution): only one family, the Sundanonchidae n. fam., has both medial and lateral peduncular anchors, each anchor pair with an anchor bar. Evolutionary lines from different monogenean evolutionary capacity levels are discussed and a new system of classification for the Monogenea is proposed.In agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. EditorIn agreeing to publish this article, I recognise that its contents are controversial and contrary to generally accepted views on monogenean systematics and evolution. I have anticipated a reaction to the article by inviting senior workers in the field to comment upon it: their views will be reported in a future issue of this journal. Editor