Preparation of potent cytotoxic ribonucleases by cationization: enhanced cellular uptake and decreased interaction with ribonuclease inhibitor by chemical modification of carboxyl groups.

Carboxyl groups of bovine RNase A were amidated with ethylenediamine (to convert negative charges of carboxylate anions to positive ones), 2-aminoethanol (to eliminate negative charges), and taurine (to keep negative charges), respectively, by a carbodiimide reaction. Human RNase 1 was also modified with ethylenediamine. Surprisingly, the modified RNases were all cytotoxic toward 3T3-SV-40 cells despite their decreased ribonucleolytic activity. However, their enzymatic activity was not completely eliminated by the presence of excess cytosolic RNase inhibitor (RI). As for native RNase A and RNase 1 which were not cytotoxic, they were completely inactivated by RI. More interestingly, within the cytotoxic RNase derivatives, cytotoxicity correlated well with the net positive charge. RNase 1 and RNase A modified with ethylenediamine were more cytotoxic than naturally occurring cytotoxic bovine seminal RNase. An experiment using the fluorescence-labeled RNase derivatives indicated that the more cationic RNases were more efficiently adsorbed to the cells. Thus, it is suggested that the modification of carboxyl groups could change complementarity of RNase to RI and as a result endow RNase cytotoxicity and that cationization enhances the efficiency of cellular uptake of RNase so as to strengthen its cytotoxicity. The finding that an extracellular human enzyme such as RNase 1 could be effectively internalized into the cell by cationization suggests that cationization is a simple strategy for efficient delivery of a protein into cells and may open the way of the development of new therapeutics.     

Cytotoxicity of RNases is increased by cationization and counteracted by K(Ca) channels

K(Ca) channels are involved in control of cell proliferation and differentiation. Here we have revealed their role in overcoming the RNase-induced cytotoxicity. Toxic effects of Streptomyces aureofaciens RNases Sa, Sa2, Sa3, and of RNase Sa charge reversal mutants on the human embryonic kidney cell lines differing only by the presence of K(Ca) channels were characterized. In contrast to other RNases, a basic variant of RNase Sa and RNase Sa3 exhibit significant cytotoxic activity of the same order of magnitude as onconase. Our data indicate the absence of a correlation between catalytic activity and stability of RNases and cytotoxicity. On the other hand, cationization enhances toxic effect of an RNase indicating the major role of a positive charge. Essentially lower sensitivity to cytotoxic microbial RNases of cells expressing K(Ca) channels was found. These results suggest that cells without the K(Ca) channel activity cannot counteract toxic effect of RNases.     

Endocytotic internalization as a crucial factor for the cytotoxicity of ribonucleases

The cytotoxic action of ribonucleases (RNases) requires the interaction of the enzyme with the cellular membrane, its internalization, translocation to the cytosol, and the degradation of ribonucleic acid. The interplay of these processes as well as the role of the thermodynamic and proteolytic stability, the catalytic activity, and the evasion from the intracellular ribonuclease inhibitor (RI) has not yet been fully elucidated. As cytosolic internalization is indispensable for the cytotoxicity of extracellular ribonucleases, we investigated the extent of cytosolic internalization of a cytotoxic, RI-evasive RNase A variant (G88R-RNase A) and of various similarly cytotoxic but RI-sensitive RNase A tandem enzyme variants in comparison to the internalization of the non-cytotoxic and RI-sensitive RNase A. After incubation of K-562 cells with the RNase A variants for 36 h, the internalized amount of RNases was analyzed by rapid cell disruption followed by subcellular fractionation and semiquantitative immunoblotting. The data indicate that an enhanced cellular uptake and an increased entry of the RNases into the cytosol can outweigh the abolishment of catalytic activity by RI. As all RNase A variants proved to be resistant to the proteases present in the different subcellular fractions for more than 100 h, our results suggest that the cytotoxic potency of RNases is determined by an efficient internalization into the cytosol.     

On the track of antitumour ribonucleases

Ribonucleases (RNases) are potential alternatives to non-mutagenic antitumour drugs. Among these enzymes, onconase, bovine-seminal ribonuclease and the Rana catesbeiana and Rana japonica lectins exert a cytotoxic activity that is selective for tumour cells. A model for the mechanism of cytotoxicity of these RNases which involves different steps is generally accepted. The model predicts that cytotoxicity requires interaction of the RNases with the cell membrane and internalisation to occur by endocytosis. Then, at a precise point, the RNases are translocated to the cytosol where they cleave cellular RNA if they have been able to preserve their ribonucleolytic activity. The cleavage of cellular RNA induces apoptosis but there is evidence suggesting that RNase-triggered apoptosis does not entirely result from the inhibition of protein synthesis. How efficiently a particular RNase carries out each of the steps determines its potency as a cytotoxin.     

Inhibition of cell growth by a fused protein of human ribonuclease 1 and human basic fibroblast growth factor

Pancreatic-type RNases are considered to have cytotoxic potential due to their ability to degrade RNA molecules when they enter the cytosol. However, most of these RNases show little cytotoxicity because cells have no active uptake mechanism for these RNases and because the ubiquitous cytoplasmic RNase inhibitor is considered to play a protective role against the endocytotic leak of RNases from the outside of cells. To study the cytotoxic potential of RNase toward malignant cells targeting growth factor receptors, the C-terminus of human RNase 1 was fused to the N-terminus of human basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF). This RNase-FGF fused protein effectively inhibited the growth of mouse melanoma cell line B16/BL6 with high levels of cell surface FGF receptor. This effect appeared to result from prolongation of the overall cell cycle rather than the killing of cells or specific arrest in a particular phase of the cell cycle. Thus, human RNase 1 fused to a ligand of cell surface molecules, such as the FGF receptor, is shown to be an effective candidate for a selective cell targeting agent with low toxic effects on normal cell types.     

Natural and engineered ribonucleases as potential cancer therapeutics

By reason of their cytotoxicity, ribonucleases (RNases) are potential anti-tumor drugs. Particularly members from the RNase A and RNase T1 superfamilies have shown promising results. Among these enzymes, Onconase, an RNase from the Northern Leopard frog, is furthest along in clinical trials. A general model for the mechanism of the cytotoxic action of RNases includes the interaction of the enzyme with the cellular membrane, internalization, translocation to the cytosol, and degradation of ribonucleic acid. The interplay of these processes as well as the role of the thermodynamic and proteolytic stability, the catalytic activity, and the capability of the RNase to evade the intracellular RNase inhibitor has not yet been fully elucidated. This paper discusses the various approaches to exploit RNases as cytotoxic agents.     

RNase 3 (ECP) is an extraordinarily stable protein among human pancreatic-type RNases

There have been some attempts to develop immunotoxins utilizing human RNase as a cytotoxic domain of antitumor agents. We have recently shown that only human RNase 3 (eosinophil cationic protein, ECP) among five human pancreatic-type RNases excels in binding to the cell surface and has a growth inhibition effect on several cancer cell lines, even though the RNase activity of RNase 3 is completely inhibited by the ubiquitously expressed cytosolic RNase inhibitor. This phenomenon may be explained by that RNase 3 is very stable against proteolytic degradation because RNase 3 internalized through endocytosis could have a longer life time in the cytosol, resulting in the accumulation of enough of it to exceed the concentration of RNase inhibitor, which allows the degradation of cytosolic RNA molecules. Thus, we compared the stabilities of human pancreatic-type RNases (RNases 1-5) and bovine RNase A by means of guanidium chloride-induced denaturation experiments based on the assumption of a two-state transition for unfolding. It was demonstrated that RNase 3 is extraordinarily stabler than either RNase A or the other human RNases (by more than 25 kJ/mol). Thus, our data suggest that in addition to its specific affinity for certain cancer cell lines, the stability of RNase 3 contributes to its unique cytotoxic effect and that it is important to stabilize a human RNase moiety through protein engineering for the design of human RNase-based immunotoxins.     

Functional Evolution of Ribonuclease Inhibitor: Insights from Birds and Reptiles

Ribonuclease inhibitor (RI) is a conserved protein of the mammalian cytosol. RI binds with high affinity to diverse secretory ribonucleases (RNases) and inhibits their enzymatic activity. Although secretory RNases are found in all vertebrates, the existence of a non-mammalian RI has been uncertain. Here, we report on the identification and characterization of RI homologs from chicken and anole lizard. These proteins bind to RNases from multiple species but exhibit much greater affinity for their cognate RNases than for mammalian RNases. To reveal the basis for this differential affinity, we determined the crystal structure of mouse, bovine, and chicken RI·RNase complexes to a resolution of 2.20, 2.21, and 1.92 Å, respectively. A combination of structural, computational, and bioinformatic analyses enabled the identification of two residues that appear to contribute to the differential affinity for RNases. We also found marked differences in oxidative instability between mammalian and non-mammalian RIs, indicating evolution toward greater oxygen sensitivity in RIs from mammalian species. Taken together, our results illuminate the structural and functional evolution of RI, along with its dynamic role in vertebrate biology.     

Structural determinants of the eosinophil cationic protein antimicrobial activity

Abstract Antimicrobial RNases are small cationic proteins belonging to the vertebrate RNase A superfamily and endowed with a wide range of antipathogen activities. Vertebrate RNases, while sharing the active site architecture, are found to display a variety of noncatalytical biological properties, providing an excellent example of multitask proteins. The antibacterial activity of distant related RNases suggested that the family evolved from an ancestral host-defence function. The review provides a structural insight into antimicrobial RNases, taking as a reference the human RNase 3, also named eosinophil cationic protein (ECP). A particular high binding affinity against bacterial wall structures mediates the protein action. In particular, the interaction with the lipopolysaccharides at the Gram-negative outer membrane correlates with the protein antimicrobial and specific cell agglutinating activity. Although a direct mechanical action at the bacteria wall seems to be sufficient to trigger bacterial death, a potential intracellular target cannot be discarded. Indeed, the cationic clusters at the protein surface may serve both to interact with nucleic acids and cell surface heterosaccharides. Sequence determinants for ECP activity were screened by prediction tools, proteolysis and peptide synthesis. Docking results are complementing the structural analysis to delineate the protein anchoring sites for anionic targets of biological significance.     

Cell targets of antitumor ribonucleases

Several ribonucleases (RNases) are known to exert a toxic effect on tumor cells, but the mechanism of their antitumor activity is still poorly understood. The review considers the RNase-cell component interaction that leads to induction of apoptosis in the tumor cell. The cell surface structures that potentially act as acceptors of exogenous RNases include acidic lipids, glycoproteins, heparan sulfate-containing proteoglycans, actin, and RNA-associated proteins. Normal and malignant cells differ in the membrane composition of these components, and the difference is to a great extent responsible for the selectivity of the RNase effect. Various RNAs may act as intracellular RNase targets, and there is evidence that exogenous RNases may intervene in RNA interference. Potassium channels, the NF-κB signaling pathway, and various caspases play a role in exogenous RNase-induced apoptosis. The cell sensitivity to exogenous RNases proved to be related to expression of certain oncogenes, such as RAS, KIT, and AML1-ETO. Understanding the mechanisms that sustain RNase cytotoxicity in susceptible malignant cells is thought to provide a basis for designing new drugs for targeted anticancer therapy.     

Identification of RNase HII from psychrotrophic bacterium, Shewanella sp. SIB1 as a high-activity type RNase H

The gene encoding RNase HII from the psychrotrophic bacterium, Shewanella sp. SIB1 was cloned, overexpressed in Escherichia coli, and the recombinant protein was purified and biochemically characterized. SIB1 RNase HII is a monomeric protein with 212 amino acid residues and shows an amino acid sequence identity of 64% to E. coli RNase HII. The enzymatic properties of SIB1 RNase HII, such as metal ion preference, pH optimum, and cleavage mode of substrate, were similar to those of E. coli RNase HII. SIB1 RNase HII was less stable than E. coli RNase HII, but the difference was marginal. The half-lives of SIB1 and E. coli RNases HII at 30 degrees C were approximately 30 and 45 min, respectively. The midpoint of the urea denaturation curve and optimum temperature of SIB1 RNase HII were lower than those of E. coli RNase HII by approximately 0.2 M and approximately 5 degrees C, respectively. However, SIB1 RNase HII was much more active than E. coli RNase HII at all temperatures studied. The specific activity of SIB1 RNase HII at 30 degrees C was 20 times that of E. coli RNase HII. Because SIB1 RNase HII was also much more active than SIB1 RNase HI, RNases HI and HII represent low- and high-activity type RNases H, respectively, in SIB1. In contrast, RNases HI and HII represent high- and low-activity type RNases H, respectively, in E. coli. We propose that bacterial cells usually contain low- and high-activity type RNases H, but these types are not correlated with RNase H families.     

Cationization, a process for the delivery of antibodies to the central nervous system. Problems encountered in its application for immunotherapy strategies such as those for clostridial poisoning

The central nervous system is separated from the rest of the body by the blood-brain barrier. This barrier prevents many substances, such as the antibodies, to penetrate into the brain making it difficult to use them for the treatment of brain diseases, such as tetanus and botulism. These two diseases are caused by the development of bacilli of the genus Clostridium which release neurotropic toxins. Specific antibodies can neutralize toxin activity when the toxin is in the blood but are ineffective when it is transported into nerve cells. Various invasive strategies have been used to deliver antibodies to the brain. However, they can induce seizures and transient neurologic deficits and may be applicable only for diseases restricted to the brain surface. Physiologically based strategies utilizing transport systems naturally present at the blood-brain barrier appear to be a more promising approach to brain delivery of antibodies. Cationization is a chemical treatment that causes the conversion of superficial carboxyl groups on a protein into extended primary amino groups. This is used to increase interactions of this protein with the negative charges at the luminal plasma membrane of the brain endothelial cells. The cationized protein can then undergo adsorptive mediated transcytosis through the blood-brain barrier. There are many problems yet to be solved in successfully carrying out in vivo applications of cationized antibodies. One of these problems is that cationization can cause damage to an antibody molecule and, thus, can compromise its binding affinity. Depending on the radiolabelling of the cationized antibodies, a serum inhibition phenomenon can possibly alter the pharmacokinetics and the organ distribution of these molecules. The antibodies can be cationized using various, synthetic (hexamethylenediamine) or naturally occuring (e.g., putrescine) polyamines. Hexamethylenediamine-induced and putrescine-induced brain uptakes of various antibodies and proteins have been shown, but the results obtained suggest that cationization with putrescine may be a more efficient approach to blood-brain barrier delivery. The development of animal or cellular models to check for therapeutic efficacy of cationized antibodies is necessary. In spite of the difficulties, the studies described in this paper indicate that cationization can be a realistic delivery strategy for carrying antibodies across the blood-brain barrier. The advances made in antibody technologies help generate more appropriate immunological structures for brain transfer with better effector functions and decreased immunogenicity or toxicity. Taken together, these two aspects can lead to further developments in treatment of intoxications caused by the clostridial neurotoxins.     

Cytosolic RNase inhibitor only affects RNases with intrinsic cytotoxicity

Cytosolic RNase inhibitor binds to and neutralizes most members of the pancreatic type RNase superfamily. However, there are a few exceptions, e.g. amphibian onconase and bovine seminal RNase, and these are endowed with cytotoxic activity. Also, RNase variants created by mutagenesis to partially evade the RNase inhibitor acquire cytotoxic activity. These findings have led to the proposal that the cytosolic inhibitor acts as a sentry to protect mammalian cells from foreign RNases. We silenced the expression of the gene encoding the cytosolic inhibitor in HeLa cells and found that the cells become more sensitive to foreign cytotoxic RNases. However foreign, non-cytotoxic RNases remain non-cytotoxic. These results indicate that the cytosolic inhibitor neutralizes those foreign RNases that are intrinsically cytotoxic and have access to the cytosol. However, its normal physiological role may not be to guard against foreign RNases in general.     

Human non-secretory ribonucleases. I. Purification, peptide mapping and lectin blotting analysis of the kidney, liver and spleen enzymes

Human non-secretory neutral ribonucleases (RNases) from kidney,liver and spleen have been purified and characterized. SDS—PAGEindicates that all three RNases are highly purified and haveapparent mol. wts of 17–18 kDa. Kinetic analysis indicatesthat all three RNases have a broad pH optimum centred around6.5, and all three have similar substrate specificities withsignificant preference for RNA and poly(U) when compared topoly(C), poly (A) and poly(G). All of the above data, as wellas immunoblotting data using three polyclonal antibodies (anti-humanliver RNase, anti-human pancreatic RNase, anti-human eosino-phil-derivedneurotoxin), indicate that the three proteins are highly purifiedand are non-secretory RNases (IIN). Further characterizationby cyanogen bromide peptide mapping and extensive lectin blottingindicated no significant differences between the three humanRNases. All three RNases appear to have very similar, if notidentical, protein backbones and all three are glycoproteinswhich are recognized by lectins with specificity for GlcNAc,Fuc and, to a lesser extent, with specificity for Galß(1–4)GlcNAc.No significant tissuespecific differences were found among thethree human non-secretory RNases. lectin blotting non-secretory RNases peptide mapping     

The success of the RNase scaffold in the advance of biosciences and in evolution

In 1938 the new word "ribonuclease" was coined to name an enzyme capable of degrading RNA, before the name "ribonucleic acid" was accepted, as at that time RNA was still labeled YNA, for Yeast Nucleic Acid. Later, four Nobel prizes were awarded to investigators working with the "ribonuclease", RNase A from bovine pancreas. Their work greatly advanced our knowledge of protein chemistry and biology, by producing the first complete amino acid composition and the first covalent structure of a protein, the first complete synthesis of an enzyme, and the discovery that the three-dimensional structure of a protein is dictated by its amino acid sequence. Today, well over 100 homologs of RNase A have been identified in all tetrapods, and recently in fishes. Based on the latter findings, a vertebrate RNase superfamily has been appropriately defined, with RNase A as its prototype. Thus, the success of the RNase structure and function not only in promoting the advance of biosciences, but also in evolution, has become clear. Several RNases from the superfamily are endowed with non-catalytic "special" bioactions. Among these are angiogenins, characterized by their ability to stimulate the formation of blood vessels. Recently, four RNases have been identified in Danio rerio, or zebrafish, produced as recombinant proteins, and characterized. As two of them have angiogenic activity, the hypothesis is made that the whole superfamily of vertebrate RNases evolved from early angiogenic RNases. Given the microbicidal activity of some mammalian angiogenins, and of the reported fish angiogenins, the alternative hypothesis is also discussed, that the ancestral RNases were host-defense RNases.     

The role of electrostatic interactions in the antitumor activity of dimeric RNases

The cytotoxic action of some ribonucleases homologous to bovine pancreatic RNase A, the superfamily prototype, has interested and intrigued investigators. Their ribonucleolytic activity is essential for their cytotoxic action, and their target RNA is in the cytosol. It has been proposed that the cytosolic RNase inhibitor (cRI) plays a major role in determining the ability of an RNase to be cytotoxic. However, to interact with cRI RNases must reach the cytosol, and cross intracellular membranes. To investigate the interactions of cytotoxic RNases with membranes, cytotoxic dimeric RNases resistant, or considered to be resistant to cRI, were assayed for their effects on negatively charged membranes. Furthermore, we analyzed the electrostatic interaction energy of the RNases complexed in silico with a model membrane. The results of this study suggest that close correlations can be recognized between the cytotoxic action of a dimeric RNase and its ability to complex and destabilize negatively charged membranes.     

Cell cycle-related differences in susceptibility of NIH/3T3 cells to ribonucleases

Microinjection of Onconase or RNase A into NIH/3T3 cells was used to study the intracellular actions of these two proteins. Onconase preferentially killed actively growing cells in both microinjection and cell culture experiments. Moreover, agents that increased the number of cells in S phase such as serum or microinjected signal transduction mediators (Ras, protein kinase C, and mitogen-activated protein kinase) enhanced Onconase cytotoxicity. Conversely, agents that decreased these proliferative pathways (dibutyryl cAMP and protein kinase A) correspondingly diminished Onconase cytotoxicity in microinjection experiments. These results were also mimicked in cell culture experiments since log-phase v-ras-transformed NIH/3T3 cells were more sensitive to Onconase (IC50 of 7 microg/ml) than parental NIH/3T3 fibroblasts (IC50 of 40 microg/ml). Based on those data we postulated that Onconase-mediated cell death in NIH/3T3 cells was related to events occurring at two or more points in the cell cycle preferentially associated with late G1/S and S phases. In contrast, quiescent NIH/3T3 cells were more sensitive to microinjected RNase A than log phase cells and positive mediators of proliferative signal transduction did not enhance RNase A-mediated cytotoxicity. Taken together, these results demonstrate that these two RNases use different pathways and/or mechanisms to elicit cytotoxic responses in NIH/3T3 cells. Predictions formulated from these studies can be tested for relevance to RNase actions in different target tumor cells.     

Specific binding of a Pop6/Pop7 heterodimer to the P3 stem of the yeast RNase MRP and RNase P RNAs

Pop6 and Pop7 are protein subunits of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RNase MRP and RNase P. Here we show that bacterially expressed Pop6 and Pop7 form a soluble heterodimer that binds the RNA components of both RNase MRP and RNase P. Footprint analysis of the interaction between the Pop6/7 heterodimer and the RNase MRP RNA, combined with gel mobility assays, demonstrates that the Pop6/7 complex binds to a conserved region of the P3 domain. Binding of these proteins to the MRP RNA leads to local rearrangement in the structure of the P3 loop and suggests that direct interaction of the Pop6/7 complex with the P3 domain of the RNA components of RNases MRP and P may mediate binding of other protein components. These results suggest a role for a key element in the RNase MRP and RNase P RNAs in protein binding, and demonstrate the feasibility of directly studying RNA-protein interactions in the eukaryotic RNases MRP and P complexes.     

Denatured and reversibly cationized p53 readily enters cells and simultaneously folds to the functional protein in the cells

Cationization is a powerful strategy for internalizing a protein into living cells. On the other hand, a reversibly cationized denatured protein through disulfide bonds is not only soluble in water but also able to fold to the native conformation in vitro. When these advantages in cationization were combined, we developed a novel method to deliver a denatured protein into cells and simultaneously let it fold to express its function within cells. This "in-cell folding" method enhances the utility of recombinant proteins expressed in Escherichia coli as inclusion bodies; that is, the recombinant proteins in inclusion bodies are solubilized by reversible cationization through cysteine residues by disulfide bonds with aminopropyl methanethiosulfonate or pyridyldithiopropionylpolyethylenimine and then incubated with cells without an in vitro folding procedure. As a model protein, we investigated human tumor-suppressor p53. Treatment of p53-null Saos-2 cells with reversibly cationized p53 revealed that all events examined as indications of the activation of p53 in cells, such as reduction of disulfide bonds followed by tetramer formation, localization into the nucleus, induction of p53 target genes, and induction of apoptosis of cells, occurred. These results suggest that reversible cationization of a denatured protein through cysteine residues is an alternative method for delivery of a functional protein into cells. This method would be very useful when a native folded protein is not readily available.     

Why ribonucleases cause death of cancer cells

Molecular properties and possible mechanisms of action of cytotoxic ribonucleases (RNases), potential antitumor therapeutics, are characterized. The analysis of recent publications and own experimental results have allowed the authors, on the one hand, to distinguish cellular components that are responsible for selective activity of exogenous RNases towards malignant cells, and on the other--to identify the contribution of definite molecular determinants to the enzyme cytotoxicity. The predominant effect of the RNase molecule charge on the cell death induction is shown. The RNase cytotoxic effects are caused by catalytic cleavage of available RNA, by products of its hydrolysis, as well as by non-catalytic electrostatic interaction of exogenous enzyme with cell components. Potential targets for RNase action in a cancer cell have been revealed. The role of modulation of the membrane calcium-dependent potassium channels and ras-oncogene functions in the RNase-induced cell damage is defined. The effect of cytotoxic RNases on gene expression via influencing the RNA interference is discussed.