Involvement of histidine-21 in the pH-induced switch in porin channel size.

Porin is a channel-forming protein in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. In the previous paper (Todt et al., 1992), we showed that the pH induced a switch in the channel size in vitro for the porins OmpF, OmpC, and PhoE. In the results presented here, His21 of OmpC and OmpF from Escherichia coli was chemically modified with diethyl pyrocarbonate. Functional analysis of these modified porins at different pHs suggested that this histidine is involved in the pH-induced switch in channel size. Secondary structure analysis of porins at various pHs using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy indicated that there was no global change in structure accompanying the pH-induced switch in channel size.     

High Salt Concentrations Increase Permeability through OmpC Channels of Escherichia coli

OmpF and OmpC porin channels are responsible for the passage of small hydrophilic solutes across the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. Although these channels are two of the most extensively studied porin channels, what had yet remained elusive was the reason why OmpC shows markedly lower permeability than OmpF, despite having little difference in its channel size. The OmpC channel, however, is known to contain a larger number of ionizable residues than the OmpF channel. In this study, we examined the channel property of OmpF and OmpC using the intact cell of E. coli, and we found that the permeability of several β-lactams and lactose through OmpC became increased to the level comparable with OmpF with up to 0.3 m salt that may increase the Debye-Hückel shielding or with 2% ethanol or 0.3 m urea that may perturb the short range ordering of water molecules. Replacing 10 pore-lining residues that show different ionization behavior between OmpC and OmpF led to substantial conversion of channel property with respect to their permeability and response to external salt concentration. We thus propose that the overall configuration of ionizable residues in the channel that may orient water molecules and the electrostatic profile of the channel play a decisive role in defining the channel property of the OmpC porin rather than its channel size.     

Porin channels in Escherichia coli: studies with liposomes reconstituted from purified proteins.

Rates of diffusion of uncharged and charged solute molecules through porin channels were determined by using liposomes reconstituted from egg phosphatidylcholine and purified Escherichia coli porins OmpF (protein 1a), OmpC (protein 1b), and PhoE (protein E). All three porin proteins appeared to produce channels of similar size, although the OmpF channel appeared to be 7 to 9% larger than the OmpC and PhoE channels in an equivalent radius. Hydrophobicity of the solute retarded the penetration through all three channels in a similar manner. The presence of one negative charge on the solute resulted in about a threefold reduction in penetration rates through OmpF and OmpC channels, whereas it produced two- to tenfold acceleration of diffusion through the PhoE channel. The addition of the second negatively charged group to the solutes decreased the diffusion rates through OmpF and OmpC channels further, whereas diffusion through the PhoE channel was not affected much. These results suggest that PhoE specializes in the uptake of negatively charged solutes. At the present level of resolution, no sign of true solute specificity was found in OmpF and OmpC channels; peptides, for example, diffused through both of these channels at rates expected from their molecular size, hydrophobicity, and charge. However, the OmpF porin channel allowed influx of more solute molecules per unit time than did the equivalent weight of the OmpC porin when the flux was driven by a concentration gradient of the same size. This apparent difference in "efficiency" became more pronounced with larger solutes, and it is likely to be the consequence of the difference in the sizes of OmpF and OmpC channels.     

New pore protein produced in cells lysogenic for Escherichia coli phage HK253hrk

Outer membrane pore protein OmpC was identified as the receptor for the temperate Escherichia coli phage HK253hrk. The part of OmpC protein recognized by the phage was identified by using hybrid proteins in which parts of OmpC protein are replaced by the corresponding parts of the related PhoE protein. In contrast to other OmpC-specific phages, HK253hrk recognizes a part of OmpC within the C-terminal 50 amino acids of the protein. E. coli strains lysogenic for HK253hrk produce reduced amounts of OmpC protein, and produce a new pore protein instead. Expression of this new protein was temperature-dependent, i.e. low at 30 degrees C. The functioning of this new pore protein was characterized both in vivo by studying the uptake of beta-lactam antibodies and in vitro after reconstitution of the protein in black lipid films. Its effective pore size was larger than that of the OmpF pores of E. coli B. The new porin appears to be cation-selective. A comparison with the selectivity of the known OmpC and OmpF pores of E. coli showed that the new pore has a higher selectivity than OmpF but is less selective than OmpC. The new pore protein appears to function in E. coli K12 lysogens as the receptor for the phages HK187, HK189 and HK332.     

Outer Membrane Protein PhoE Takes the Place of OmpC/OmpF in Maintenance of the Surface Structure of Escherichia coli Cells

OmpC and OmpF, outer membrane porin proteins, are important in the maintenance of the cell surface structure of Escherichia coli cells [T. Nogami and S. Mizushima, J. Bacteriol., 156, 402 (1983)]. Mutants lacking both proteins are unstable and frequently revert or mutate to strains which either have regained one or both of the proteins or constitutively produce PhoE, another porin protein. In the present work, the structural importance of PhoE was studied in relation to OmpC. and OmpF. The strain devoid of both OmpC and OmpF was highly susceptible to Tris-HCl buffer at a concentration of 120 mm in terms of viability and cell structure. This strain was also susceptible to osmotic shock. In contrast, the strain possessing PhoE in place of OmpC/OmpF was as stable as the strain possessing OmpC/OmpF against these treatments. PhoE, like OmpC and OmpF, was assembled into a hexagonal lattice with lipopolysaccharide that covered the peptidoglycan sacculus. These results suggest that PhoE can take the place of OmpC/OmpF in the maintenance of the cell surface structure. The importance of porins in general in the maintenance of the cell structure is discussed.     

Construction of a series of ompF-ompC chimeric genes by in vivo homologous recombination in Escherichia coli and characterization of the translational products.

OmpF and OmpC are major outer membrane proteins. Although they are homologous proteins, they function differently in several respects. As an approach to elucidate the submolecular structures that determine the difference, a method was developed to construct a series of ompF-ompC chimeric genes by in vivo homologous recombination between these two genes, which are adjacent on a plasmid. The genomic structures of these chimeric genes were determined by restriction endonuclease analysis and nucleotide sequence determination. In almost all cases, recombination took place between the corresponding homologous regions of the ompF and ompC genes. Many of the chimeric genes produced proteins that migrated to various positions between the OmpF and OmpC proteins on polyacrylamide gel. On the basis of the results, a domain contributing to the mobility difference the OmpF and OmpC proteins was identified. Some chimeric genes did not accumulate outer membrane proteins, despite the fact that the fusion of the ompF and ompC genes was in frame. Bacterial cells possessing the chimeric proteins were also tested as to their sensitivity to phages which require either OmpF or OmpC as a receptor component. The chimeric proteins were either of the OmpF or OmpC type with respect to receptor activity. Based on the observations, the roles of submolecular domains in the structure, function, and biogenesis of the OmpF and OmpC proteins are discussed.     

Discovery of biphasic thermal unfolding of ompc with implications for surface loop stability

Escherichia coli outer membrane protein C (osmoporin) is a close homologue of OmpF or matrix porin, expressed under conditions of high osmolarity or ionic strength. Despite the fact that the proteins display very similar structures (rmsd = 0.78 ?), the channel activities (gating or selectivity) of the two proteins are markedly different, and compared to OmpF, there is much less published information about the stability and folding of OmpC. In this paper, we report a structural study of nine OmpC mutations that affect channel size and voltage gating. The secondary and tertiary structural analysis by circular dichroism (CD) indicated that the single-amino acid substitutions have little impact on the protein fold. However, a thermal denaturation study using CD and differential scanning calorimetry shows that different mutations lead to varied levels of destabilization, with the largest showing a 15 °C lower T(m) than the wild type and a 40% reduction in ΔH(cal). CD thermal denaturation measurements revealed that OmpC unfolds in a biphasic process, in which only the second phase is affected by the known mutations. The first stage of unfolding was shown to be reversible and separate from the main unfolding and loss of trimeric structure occurring in the second phase, leaving the flexible extracellular loops as the likely site of unfolding. The first phase is abolished as OmpC becomes more stable at lower pH.     

Expression of outer membrane proteins in Escherichia coli growing at acid pH

It is generally accepted for Escherichia coli that (i) the level of OmpC increases with increased osmolarity when cells are growing in neutral and alkaline media, whereas the level of OmpF decreases at high osmolarity, and that (ii) the two-component system composed of OmpR (regulator) and EnvZ (sensor) regulates porin expression. In this study, we found that OmpC was expressed at low osmolarity in medium of pH below 6 and that the expression was repressed when medium osmolarity was increased. In contrast, the expression of ompF at acidic pH was essentially the same as that at alkaline pH. Neither OmpC nor OmpF was detectable in an ompR mutant at both acid and alkaline pH values. However, OmpC and OmpF were well expressed at acid pH in a mutant envZ strain, and their expression was regulated by medium osmolarity. Thus, it appears that E. coli has a different mechanism for porin expression at acid pH. A mutant deficient in ompR grew slower than its parent strain in low-osmolarity medium at acid pH (below 5.5). The same growth diminution was observed when ompC and ompF were deleted, suggesting that both OmpF and OmpC are required for optimal growth under hypoosmosis at acid pH.     

The regulation of porin expression in Escherichia coli: effect of turgor stress

The OmpF and OmpC porins are major outer membrane proteins of Escherichia coli. Their expression is affected by medium osmolarity such that OmpF is normally produced at low osmolarity and OmpC at high osmolarity. Potassium ion accumulation is a major means by which cells maintain their internal osmolarity in high osmolarity medium in the absence of organic osmolytes such as glycine-betaine. Starvation for potassium causes cells to become turgor stressed. The effect of turgor stress and potassium ion concentration on OmpF and OmpC expression was examined. It was found that ompF gene expression was switched off by turgor stress but there was no concomitant increase in OmpC. Instead, ompC expression responded to the accumulation of potassium ions by the cell in high osmolarity medium.     

Complementation analysis of the wild-type and mutant ompR genes exhibiting different phenotypes of osmoregulation of the ompF and ompC genes of Escherichia coli

Expression of the ompF and ompC genes, which encode the major outer membrane proteins, OmpF and OmpC, respectively, is affected in a reciprocal manner by the osmolarity of the growth medium. This osmoregulation is mediated by the OmpR protein, a positive regulator of both genes, which is encoded by the ompR gene. Structural and functional properties of this regulatory protein were studied through complementation analysis of the wild-type and five mutant ompR genes that exhibited differences in osmoregulation of the expression of the OmpF and OmpC proteins. Complementation was carried out with combinations of a host strain and a plasmid, each of which carried either the wild-type or a mutant ompR gene. In some combinations, negative complementation was observed. For example, ompR1, a deletion mutation with an OmpF- OmpC- phenotype, was dominant to OmpF+ or OmpC+ phenotypes conferred by other ompR genes. Positive complementation of two mutant ompR genes was also observed in other combinations, when the two mutations were distantly located from each other on the OmpR protein. These results, together with other observations, support the view that the OmpR protein has a two-domain structure, each domain exhibiting a different role in the expression of the OmpF and OmpC proteins, and that this protein takes a multimeric structure as a functional unit.     

Crystal structure of osmoporin OmpC from E. coli at 2.0 A

Porins form transmembrane pores in the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria with matrix porin OmpF and osmoporin OmpC from Escherichia coli being differentially expressed depending on environmental conditions. The three-dimensional structure of OmpC has been determined to 2.0 A resolution by X-ray crystallography. As expected from the high sequence similarity, OmpC adopts the OmpF-like 16-stranded hollow beta-barrel fold with three beta-barrels associated to form a tight trimer. Unlike in OmpF, the extracellular loops form a continuous wall at the perimeter of the vestibule common to the three pores, due to a 14-residues insertion in loop L4. The pore constriction and the periplasmic outlet are very similar to OmpF with 74% of the pore lining residues being conserved. Overall, only few ionizable residues are exchanged at the pore lining. The OmpC structure suggests that not pore size, but electrostatic pore potential and particular atomic details of the pore linings are the critical parameters that physiologically distinguish OmpC from OmpF.     

Osmoporin OmpC forms a complex with MlaA to maintain outer membrane lipid asymmetry in Escherichia coli

Gram‐negative bacteria can survive in harsh environments in part because the asymmetric outer membrane (OM) hinders the entry of toxic compounds. Lipid asymmetry is established by having phospholipids (PLs) confined to the inner leaflet of the membrane and lipopolysaccharides (LPS) to the outer leaflet. Perturbation of OM lipid asymmetry, characterized by PL accumulation in the outer leaflet, disrupts proper LPS packing and increases membrane permeability. The multi‐component Mla system prevents PL accumulation in the outer leaflet of the OM via an unknown mechanism. Here, we demonstrate that in Escherichia coli, the Mla system maintains OM lipid asymmetry with the help of osmoporin OmpC. We show that the OM lipoprotein MlaA interacts specifically with OmpC and OmpF. This interaction is sufficient to localize MlaA lacking its lipid anchor to the OM. Removing OmpC, but not OmpF, causes accumulation of PLs in the outer leaflet of the OM in stationary phase, as was previously observed for MlaA. We establish that OmpC is an additional component of the Mla system; the OmpC‐MlaA complex may function to remove PLs directly from the outer leaflet to maintain OM lipid asymmetry. Our work reveals a novel function for the general diffusion channel OmpC in lipid transport.     

Construction of a series of ompC-ompF chimeric genes by in vivo homologous recombination in Escherichia coli and characterization of their translational products

Summary OmpC and OmpF are major outer membrane proteins and although they are homologous proteins, they function differently in several respects. As an approach to elucidate the submolecular structures that determine their differences, we have constructed a series of ompC-ompF chimeric genes by in vivo homologous recombination between these two genes, which are adjacent on a plasmid. The recombination sites in the chimeric genes were localized by means of restriction endonuclease analysis and nucleotide sequence determination. Most of the chimeric gene products were accumulated in the outer membrane. One of the chimeric gene products, with a fusion site in a central region between the OmpC and OmpF proteins, was normally expressed but not accumulated in the outer membrane. The trimeric structures of some of the chimeric gene products appeared to be extremely unstable in a SDS solution. From these results, domains contributing to the formation of specific structures in which the OmpC and OmpF proteins differ were identified. Bacterial cells possessing the chimeric gene products were also investigated as to their sensitivity to phages that require either OmpC or OmpF as a receptor component. With the aid of the chimeric gene products, the immunogenic determinants for three anti-OmpC monoclonal antibodies were found to be localized at different portions of the OmpC polypeptide: the N-terminal, central and C-terminal portions, respectively.     

Expression of Outer Membrane Proteins in Escherichia coli Growing at Acid pH

It is generally accepted for Escherichia coli that (i) the level of OmpC increases with increased osmolarity when cells are growing in neutral and alkaline media, whereas the level of OmpF decreases at high osmolarity, and that (ii) the two-component system composed of OmpR (regulator) and EnvZ (sensor) regulates porin expression. In this study, we found that OmpC was expressed at low osmolarity in medium of pH below 6 and that the expression was repressed when medium osmolarity was increased. In contrast, the expression of ompF at acidic pH was essentially the same as that at alkaline pH. Neither OmpC nor OmpF was detectable in an ompR mutant at both acid and alkaline pH values. However, OmpC and OmpF were well expressed at acid pH in a mutant envZ strain, and their expression was regulated by medium osmolarity. Thus, it appears that E. coli has a different mechanism for porin expression at acid pH. A mutant deficient in ompR grew slower than its parent strain in low-osmolarity medium at acid pH (below 5.5). The same growth diminution was observed when ompC and ompF were deleted, suggesting that both OmpF and OmpC are required for optimal growth under hypoosmosis at acid pH.     

Isolation and characterization of mutations altering expression of the major outer membrane porin proteins using the local anaesthetic procaine

Mutations at several different chromosomal locations affect expression of the major outer membrane porin proteins (OmpF and OmpC) of Escherichia coli K12. Those that map at 21 and 47 minutes define the structural genes for OmpF and OmpC, respectively. A third locus, ompB, is defined by mutations that map at 74 minutes. The ompB locus contains two genes whose products regulate the relative amounts of ompF and ompC expression. One of these genes, ompR, encodes a positive regulatory protein that interacts at the ompF and ompC promoters. Mutations in ompR exhibit an OmpF- OmpC- or an OmpF+ OmpC- phenotype. The product of the second gene, envZ, affects regulation of the porin proteins in an unknown manner. Previously isolated mutations in envZ exhibit an OmpF- OmpC+ phenotype and also have pleiotropic effects on other exported proteins. In the presence of local anaesthetics such as procaine, wild-type strains exhibit properties similar to these envZ mutants, i.e. OmpF- OmpC+. Using ompF-lac fusion strains, we have exploited this procaine effect to isolate two new classes of envZ mutations. One of these classes exhibits an OmpF+ OmpC- phenotype. The other allows expression of both OmpF and OmpC but alters the relative amounts found under various growth conditions. Like previously isolated envZ mutations, these also affect regulation of other exported proteins, such as lambda receptor. These results permit a more detailed analysis of the omp regulon and they may shed light on one of the mechanisms by which local anaesthetics exert their effect.