Clinical impact of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. A cytohistologic comparison

OBJECTIVE: To assess the percentage of squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) in the atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) cytologic diagnosis. STUDY DESIGN: From January 1994 to December 1995, 421 cervical Pap smears with a diagnosis of ASCUS were followed with cervical biopsies within three months. The ASCUS cytologic diagnosis was correlated with the histologic findings and stratified according to age group, previous abnormal history and cell type of ASCUS (squamoid vs. metaplastic). RESULTS: Histologic diagnosis showed that of ASCUS diagnoses, 13% were normal, 34% were reactive, 4.8% were atypical, 43% were low grade SIL, 4% were high grade SIL, 1% were carcinoma in situ, and none were invasive lesions. The patients in the youngest group, up to 25 years, demonstrated the highest percentage of SIL. Patients with a previous abnormal gynecologic history showed a higher percentage of SIL than those without an abnormal history. SILs were observed in 51.5% of squamoid ASCUS and 36.5% of metaplastic ASCUS. CONCLUSION: Forty-eight percent of females having an ASCUS diagnosis on Pap smears had SIL and thus a preneoplastic lesion. The highest percentage of SIL was found in females 25 years and younger. Our findings suggest that an ASCUS diagnosis warrants ongoing follow-up.     

Is a liquid‐based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?

K. Sigurdsson
Is a liquid‐based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear? Background: The comparative sensitivity of liquid‐based cytology (LBC) test and conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smears is controversial. Material and methods: This study analyses the distribution of cytology, histology, colposcopy and large loop excision of the transformation zone among women screened in Iceland with LBC at the Cancer Detection Clinic in Reykjavik and with a conventional Pap smear outside the Detection Clinic in 2007–2011. The study material included 42 654 LBC tests from 20 439 women and 103 909 Pap smears from 61 574 women. The period 2000–2004 is used to correct for potential bias as a result of unequal distribution of the studied parameters between the study sites before the introduction of LBC. Results: The observed results indicated that women screened with an LBC sample had significantly decreased detection rates of inadequate smears, increased detection of low‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL)/atypical cytology and referrals to colposcopy, and an increased detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) irrespective of age. LBC increased significantly the detection rates of high‐grade squamous intraepithelial lesion or worse (HSIL+) cytology and CIN3+ histology only in women under 40 years of age. Taking into consideration the unequal prevalence of the studied parameters between the study sites in 2000–2004 indicated, however, that LBC only affected the rate of inadequate and low‐grade cytology tests under the age of 40 years. Positive predictive values for CIN2+ were not significantly different between the tests. Conclusions: The study results support the view that LBC is no more sensitive than Pap smears for the detection of HSIL+ and CIN2+ irrespective of age. LBC decreased the rate of inadequate smears, but increased the rate of low‐grade cytology under the age of 40 years and decreased the total rate of abnormal smears over the age of 40 years.     

The post-LLETZ cervical smear: influence of time interval from LLETZ

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of the time interval between large loop excision through the transformation zone (LLETZ) and the first subsequent cervical smear on the adequacy of the smear for cytologic interpretation and cytologic abnormality rates. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, case-note analysis of women attending a colposcopy clinic between May 1, 1999, and March 31, 2002, who had high grade histologic lesions on their LLETZ biopsy, irrespective of the referral indication. RESULTS: A total of 771 women were included in the study. Negative smears were reported in 639 (82.9%); 82 (10.6%) were abnormal and 50 (6.5%) unsatisfactory. The post-LLETZ smear was performed at a median interval of 105 days (range, 48-829). A univariate logistic regression analysis did not reveal any relationship between the rate of unsatisfactory or abnormal smears and the interval since having LLETZ (p = 0.935). CONCLUSION: These data do not support the traditionally held concept that performing the post-LLETZ smear before 6 months increases the rate of unsatisfactory or abnormal smears.     

Feasibility of cytology-based cervical cancer screening in rural Cameroon

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of cervical cancer and its precursors in a rural population in Cameroon and to evaluate the feasibility of a cytology-based screening program in such areas. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study was conducted in the rural town of Bafang. Following an advocacy campaign, 750 women were recruited. After a clinical examination, all women had a Pap smear with the Cervex Brush. Each sample had two preparations, conventional and liquid based. The conventional smears were interpreted in Bafang. Cytologically abnormal cases, those with clinical inflammation and/or macroscopic cervical lesions, had a colposcopic examination and directed biopsy. HSIL and colposcopically abnormal cases were treated with large loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ). The liquid-based preparations and histopathology were performed in Geneva and the results sent to Cameroon for patient follow-up. RESULTS: Mean age and parity of the women screened were 43.7 years and 7.8, respectively. The conventional smears showed 3.6% cervical abnormalities: 2% (15/740) ASCUS/LSIL and 1.6% (12/740) HSIL. The liquid-based preparations showed 12.6% (91/722) cervical abnormalities: 10.1% (73/722) ASCUS/LSIL and 2.5% (18/722) HSIL. Fifty percent of samples in both preparations showed evidence of inflammation. Histology was performed on 64 colposcopically directed punch biopsies and LLETZ specimens. The histologic diagnoses agreed with the cytologic findings in 60% (14/23) of conventional smears and 85% (12/14) of liquid-based preparations. CONCLUSION: There is a high rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in the unscreened rural population of Cameroon. The situation is complicated by a high rate of cervical infection. A population-based cytologic screening program for cervical cancer would not be feasible in rural Cameroon because of high cost, low quality and limited technical facilities. Rural Africa requires an algorithm using a simple, low-cost technique of mass screening and an improved cytology service only to triage selected patients.     

Do qualifiers of ASCUS distinguish between low- and high-risk patients?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the qualification of a Pap smear classified as atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) favor reactive or neoplasia as recommended by the Bethesda System. STUDY DESIGN: The smears from 105 concurrent patients with a cytologic diagnosis of ASCUS not otherwise qualified were reviewed and subclassified as ASCUS favor reactive, low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) or high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) based on the Bethesda System criteria. The cervical biopsy diagnoses were correlated. RESULTS: Of the 105 cases classified as ASCUS, 37 were subclassified as favor reactive, 51 as favor LSIL and 17 as favor HSIL on cytologic review. In the ASCUS favor reactive group, 19 (51%) had reactive changes on biopsy, 17 (46%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1, and 1 (2%) had CIN 3. A total of 48% patients had CIN. In the favor LSIL group, there was CIN 1 in 28 cases (55%), CIN 2 or 3 in 12 (23%) and benign changes in 11 (22%) on biopsy. Seventy-eight percent had CIN. In the 17 cases classified as ASCUS favor HSIL group, all had CIN. CONCLUSION: Of the total 105 cases of ASCUS, 71% had CIN, 29% had reactive changes on follow-up biopsies, and 48% of patients in the ASCUS favor reactive group had CIN. Qualifiers of ASCUS have questionable utility in patient management.     

Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the conventional Pap test and liquid-based cytology (LBC) in an ongoing multicenter trial testing optional screening tools (cytology, screening colposcopy, visual inspection with acetic acid, visual inspection with Lugol's Iodine, cervicography and Hybrid Capture II [HCII] (Digene Brazil, S?o Paulo, Brazil) conventional and self-sampling), for cervical cancer in Brazil and Argentina. STUDY DESIGN: A cohort of 12,107 women attending four clinics (Campinas, S?o Paulo, Porto Alegre, Buenos Aires) were randomized into the 8 diagnostic arms. Women testing positive with any of the tests were referred for colposcopy, and cervical biopsies were used as the gold standard to assess performance characteristics of the diagnostic tests. Conventional Pap smears were sampled by all clinics (n = 10,240), and LBC (Autocyte PREP, [TriPath Imaging, Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.], n=320, and DNA-Citoliq [Digene Brazil], n =1,346) was performed by 1 of the clinics. RESULTS: Conventional Pap smears showed no squamous intraepithelial lesions (normal) in 8,946 (87.4%) and LBC in 1,373 (82.4%). Using high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) as the cutoff, Pap smears predicted high grade (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia [CIN] 3) with OR 63.0 (95% CI, 36.90-107.70), standard error (SE) 59%, SP 97.8%, positive predictive value (PPV) 68.1% and negative predictive value (NPV) 96.7%. The same figures for Autocyte PREP were: OR 9.0 (95% CI, 2.43-33.24), sensitivity (SE) 33.3%, specificity (SP) 100%, PPV 100% and negative PV (NPV) 88.8%. DNA-Citoliq detected CIN 3 as follows: OR 11.8 (95% CI 2.60-53.26), SE 40.0%, SP 94.6%, PPV 40.0% and NPV 94.6%. Lowering the cutoff to low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions increased SE and NPV but compromised SP and PPV. The detection rates for high grade lesions after an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance diagnosis were similar with the 3 techniques. In our settings, the 3 methods of cervical cytology were slightly different in performance. The conventional Pap smear had the highest SE, while Autocyte PREP had 100% SP and PPV in detecting CIN3 with the HSIL cutoff. All 3 tests had lower SE but higher SP as compared to HCII.     

Assessment of the Accuracy of Cytology In Women Referred For Colposcopy and Biopsy: the Results of a 1 Year Audit

The results of weekly colposcopy review meetings have been audited for 1 year and cases where there was a discrepancy between the referral cervical smear and the initial colposcopy biopsy have been analysed. New referrals (n = 476) for colposcopy were studied. In the final outcome 80% of 326 women referred for moderate or severe dyskaryosis were found to have cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade II or III or invasive carcinoma. Three women found to have invasive carcinoma had been referred for severely dyskaryotic smears. Twenty women were referred for smears with cell changes suggesting glandular neoplasia: five were found to have adenocarcinoma in situ, whereas eight had CIN and seven had negative biopsies. The results justify the referral policy and demonstrate the need for further investigation when initial colposcopic biopsies are negative.     

Should smears in a colposcopy clinic be taken after the application of acetic acid?

Conventionally, cervical smears obtained during a colposcopic examination are taken before the application of acetic acid. However, this occasionally precipitates bleeding and removes epithelium from the cervix, particularly in the presence of cervical pathology, making colposcopic evaluation difficult. This study examined the possibility of deferring the smear until the end of the colposcopic examination. In the first part of the study, the cytologic results on cervical samples taken from the same patient before and after the application of acetic acid were compared. In the second part of the study, only one smear was taken per patient (either before or after colposcopic assessment) to eliminate the possibility that the taking of the first smear affected the quality of the second. The results of both parts of the study showed that deferring the smear until after the application of acetic acid leads to an unacceptably high rate of unsatisfactory and falsely negative smears. Thus, deferring the taking of the cervical smear until after the colposcopic evaluation results in a poor cytologic evaluation, although it might facilitate the colposcopic examination in some patients.     

Outcome of women referred to colposcopy for persistently inadequate smears

The outcome of referral to colposcopy of 240 women who had persistently inadequate smears was investigated. Of 232 women who attended colposcopy, 214 (92.2%) had a normal outcome, 12 (5.2%) had low grade abnormalities, and six (2.6%) had high grade abnormalities. This group of women therefore has a negligibly increased risk of harbouring cervical neoplasia. Although not directly comparable, women with a history of previous abnormal cytology did not have a higher risk than those without such a history. Unnecessary colposcopy could have been avoided in the majority of cases if a good quality repeat smear had been taken. Improved smear taker training could decrease the number of referrals. A hospital cytology clinic is proposed as a cost-effective alternative to colposcopy at the first attendance.     

The Cytological Prediction of Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia In Colposcopically Directed Biopsies

The tissue sections and preceding cervical smears of 1262 women who had colposcopic cervical biopsies were reviewed and the reports correlated. Close correlation between the cytological and histological findings, to within one histological grade of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), was noted in 86% of cases. However, the biopsy was negative, or contained evidence of wart virus infection only, in 24% of cases where dyskaryotic cells had been observed in the cervical smear. Of particular concern was the fact that negative histological findings were recorded in 13% of cases where the smear contained cells showing a moderate dyskaryosis and in 1.26% of cases where the smear showed severe dyskaryosis. This suggests that colposcopically directed biopsies do not always reflect the underlying pathological changes in the cervix. Management of these cases is discussed. In 45 women with a normal cervical smear prior to biopsy, histology revealed seven cases of CIN 3 and one case of invasive squamous carcinoma. This indicates that referral for colposcopy is advisable whenever there is clinical suspicion of cancer, even if the cervical smear report is normal.     

Cytologic predictors of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in women with an ASCUS Pap smear

OBJECTIVE: To identify cytologic parameters on Pap smears of women with an atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) diagnosis that could help cytologists to indicate whether a particular ASCUS case is most likely related to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 1 or 2/3. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 360 eligible women diagnosed with ASCUS and referred to the colposcopy clinic of Saint-Sacrement Hospital participated in the study. Eligible women were those aged 18-50 years, newly diagnosed with ASCUS, with no history of cervical biopsies or treatment, and not pregnant at the time of the visit. Colposcopically directed biopsies of lesions were obtained. All Pap smears were reviewed according to 36 different cytomorphologic criteria. The regression logistic model was used to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) for the associations between cytologic criteria observed in smears and the diagnosis of CIN made on biopsies. All cytologic criteria significantly (P < .05) associated with CIN were entered in the models, and a backward selection was done to determine independent cytologic predictors of CIN 1 and 2/3. RESULTS: Biopsies revealed that 22.2% of the study population had concurrent CIN. CIN I and 2/3 were identified in 61 (16.9%) and 19 women (5.3%), respectively. Clear perinuclear spaces (OR = 2.5, P = .002) and moderate nuclear atypia (OR = 4.4, P = .02) were two cytologic criteria independently associated with CIN 1. Four independent predictors of CIN 2/3 were identified: the presence of clear perinuclear spaces (OR = 5.9, P = .004), hyperchromasia (OR = 3.9, P = .04), moderate anisokaryosis (OR = 13.1, P = .01 and increased nuclear volume of metaplastic cells (OR = 5.1, P = .007). CONCLUSION: These observations may help cytologists to better categorize ASCUS lesions as intraepithelial ones and will also contribute to improving the Bethesda definition of ASCUS. Further studies are planned to validate these observations.     

Utility of imprint cytology for early presumptive diagnosis in clinically suspicious cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: To determine the utility of imprint cytology (IC) in providing an early presumptive diagnosis of clinically suspected cervical carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 219 clinically suspicious cervical cancer cases underwent Pap test, punch biopsy and IC at the same sitting. Correlations were performed between these diagnostic modalities to determine the sensitivity and specificity of IC in diagnosis of cervical cancer. RESULTS: The overall accuracy of IC in detecting cervical cancers was 96.2%. About 78% of squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), 60% of adenocarcinomas and 100% of small cell carcinoma could be accurately typed on imprints. Twelve malignant lesions were diagnosed on IC among 26 unsatisfactory biopsies. Although there was no false positive result, 3.5% false negative diagnoses were given on IC. The sensitivity and specificity of imprint smear cytology to detect malignancy was 96.2% and 100%. Agreement between imprint cytology and Pap smear diagnosis of malignancy was 95.3%. kappa Statistics revealed excellent agreement between imprints and biopsies and between imprints and Pap smears in diagnosis of malignant lesions. CONCLUSION: IC can be used as an adjunctive technique for an early and reliable preliminary presumptive diagnosis of cancer of the uterine cervix.     

Management of women with mild and moderate cervical dyskaryosis.

OBJECTIVE--To compare the outcomes in women with mild and moderate dyskaryosis after increasing periods of surveillance and thereby to define a rational protocol for managing such women. DESIGN--Prospective study with randomisation of women to one of four treatment groups, each with a different period of surveillance; one group in which the women were given immediate treatment and three other groups in which the women were under surveillance for six, 12, and 24 months. SETTING--A dedicated colposcopy clinic in Aberdeen, Scotland. SUBJECTS--902 women who presented with a mildly or moderately dyskaryotic smear for the first time. INTERVENTIONS--Cytological and colposcopic examinations at intervals of six months until the allocated period of surveillance was completed, at which time biopsy was performed. Women with severe dyskaryosis were withdrawn from surveillance and a biopsy was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--The histological findings after punch biopsy or large loop excision of the transformation zone, and the trends in cytological appearances of serial cervical smears. RESULTS--793 women completed the study. In all, 769 women had an adequate final smear, of which 197 were normal cytologically, 328 were still mildly or moderately dyskaryotic, and 244 were severely dyskaryotic. Seventeen of the 67 (25%) women with one repeat smear showing non-dyskaryosis had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade III compared with only one of the 31 (3%) women with no dyskaryosis in four repeat cervical smears (P < 0.0001). None of the women had invasive cancer. Of 158 women whose index smear showed mild dyskaryosis and who were allocated to the group under surveillance for two years, only 40 had not defaulted or still had dyskaryotic smears by the end of the two years. CONCLUSION--Cytological surveillance, although safe, is not an efficient strategy for managing women with mildly abnormal smears. Women with any degree of dyskaryosis in a smear should be referred for colposcopy.     

Polymorphism of Ag(+)-NORs in cervical smears from women with cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate Ag(+)-stained (Ag(+)-NOR) polymorphism in four groups of patients with various grades of cervical lesions and in a control group. STUDY DESIGN: Forty-five women were selected, diagnosed and classified on the bases of the Pap smear and colposcopy/biopsy at Hospital de Ginecologia y Obstetricia del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social in Monterrey, Mexico. Five categories were considered: (1) inflammatory, (2) low grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSILs), (3) high grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSILs), (4) invasive cervical cancer, and (5) normal. The cervical smears were stained by the Ag(+)-NOR method. One hundred cells per slide were counted and classified according to the polymorphism of Ag(+)-NOR dots: typical (spherical) and atypical (large, kidney shaped and clustered). The four shapes of Ag(+)-NORs were quantified by percentage and transformed using the arcsine root procedure. RESULTS: Statistical analysis showed a significant decrease in spherical shape according to neoplastic development. The three atypical shapes showed a significant increase in patients with HSIL and invasive carcinoma in respect to LSIL. Principal components analysis grouped the data at five locations in the plane formed by the first two principal components according to the diagnosis. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest the potential diagnostic and prognostic value of the determination of Ag(+)-NOR polymorphism in cervical cytology studies.     

Accuracy of thin-layer cytology in patients undergoing cervical cone biopsy

OBJECTIVE: To compare the accuracy of thin-layer cytology with Autocyte PREP (TriPath Imaging Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) with conventional smears in 500 women undergoing cervical cone biopsy. STUDY DESIGN: The study was performed among 500 consecutive women presenting for cone biopsy for high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) on biopsy in 350 (70%) and discrepant cytology/colpohistology in 150 (30%). Before performing a cone biopsy, two cervical samples were collected for conventional smears and thin-layer cytologic slides, with randomization of the order. Conventional smears were stained and diagnosed at Pasteur Cerba, while thin-layer cytologic slides were processed at a local TriPath office (Meylan, France) and sent in a masked fashion for screening at Pasteur Cerba. Any slides initially read as normal were reviewed again and reported without knowledge of the other cytologic or cone biopsy data. The final cytologic diagnoses for the two methods were compared with histopathology of the cone biopsy. RESULTS: The conventional smear was unsatisfactory in 58 (11.6%) of cases, while there were 4 (0.8%) unsatisfactory thin-layer cytologic slides (P < .001). Endocervical cells were missing from 31 (6.2%) of conventional smears and 34 (6.8%) of thin-layer cytologic slides. For the pooled data, sensitivities of conventional smear and thin layer for detecting high grade CIN (0.82% and 0.86%, respectively) were similar as were specificities (0.40% and 0.43%, respectively). When first samples were compared, the sensitivities of the conventional smear and thin layer for high grade CIN were 0.79% and 0.89%, respectively (P = .02), with corresponding specificities of 0.41% and 0.36% (P < .01). CONCLUSION: When controlled for sample order, the sensitivity of thin-layer cytology for detecting high grade CIN was significantly higher than that of conventional smears in patients with previous abnormal cytology, but at the expense of specificity.     

Performance of cytology and colposcopy in diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) in HIV-positive and HIV-negative women

As part of an extensive multi-institutional DIANAIDS-HIV-HPV-SIL project run in Italy (co-ordinated by ISS), the present study compares the performance (sensitivity, specificity, agreement) of routine cervical smear cytology with that of colposcopy in the detection of histologically-confirmed CIN lesions in 37 HIV-positive and 21 HIV-negative women, belonging to the DIANAIDS cohort of 459 women. All women were subjected to a cervical smear, colposcopy and biopsy, making possible the pairwise comparison of these techniques. In the whole series of HIV-positive and HIV-negative women, cytology had a sensitivity of 86.9% and specificity of 83.3%, the sensitivity of grade 2 abnormality on colposcopy against histology being 82.6% and specificity, 33.3%. No statistically significant difference was observed in the performance of Pap smears between the HIV-positive and HIV-negative women. The sensitivity of cytology was 89.7% vs 82.4% and the specificity, 75% vs 100%. For colposcopy, the sensitivity was 79.3% vs 88.2% and the specificity, 75% vs 50%. These data suggest that cervical Pap smear cytology is a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic tool in the clinical monitoring of lower genital tract pathology in HIV-positive women. Colposcopy, on the other hand, proved to be a somewhat less accurate diagnostic tool in these women.     

Exfoliative cytology of lymphoepitheliomalike carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A report of two cases

BACKGROUND: Lymphoepitheliomalike carcinomas (LECs) are morphologically similar to undifferentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma but occur at sites other than the nasopharynx. They rarely occur in the uterine cervix. Sixty-five cases of LEC of the cervix have been published to date, and the pitfalls of histopathologic interpretation have been discussed. This undifferentiated carcinoma with a prominent lymphocytic infiltrate represents a challenge for the pathologist examining a scant cervical biopsy or Pap smear. Distinguishing LEC as a separate entity is important. Despite the fact that the epithelial component is poorly differentiated, this neoplasm is associated with a lower frequency of lymph node metastases, is potentially radiosensitive and has a better prognosis. Although mentioned in passing in several papers, the exfoliative cytology of this cervical neoplasm has not been adequately discussed. We report the cytologic features of LEC in cervical smears obtained from two patients. CASES: The first patient presented with menometrorrhagia and postcoital bleeding. The cervical smear taken at the time of presentation was reported as unsatisfactory for evaluation. ASCUS was diagnosed on a vaginal smear obtained one year earlier. The second patient presented with a complaint of postcoital bleeding. A cervical smear and the cervical biopsy taken at the time of presentation were reported as ASCUS and high grade dysplasia versus carcinoma, respectively. A retrospective review of the cervical smears revealed rare malignant cells occurring singly or in small groups. The tumor cells had a high nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio, irregular nuclear membrane and hyperchromatic nuclei with coarse chromatin and were obscured by heavy inflammation and blood. The background resembled that of a menstrual smear. CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of LEC of the cervix is often made on a loop electrical excision procedure or on a hysterectomy specimen. The presence of heavy inflammation and blood, which can obscure the malignant nature of the cells, presents the cytopathologist with a challenging diagnosis of LEC in cervical smears. In view of the prognostic implications, it is desirable for the pathologist to classify LEC as a distinct entity.     

Primary cervical lymphoma: the role of cervical cytology

Two cases of primary malignant lymphoma of the uterine cervix are reported. Both were confirmed by histology as high grade B cell lymphomas. In one case, the diagnosis was made on a second colposcopic biopsy after an initial cervical smear and colposcopic biopsy were negative. In the second case, dyskaryotic cells of uncertain type were identified in a cervical smear taken at colposcopy performed as part of follow up for previous cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)I. The cytologic features and differential diagnosis of this rare cervical neoplasm are discussed, with emphasis on the role of the Papanicolaou smear in the initial diagnosis of this tumour.     

Pap smear adequacy--is the assessing criterion including endocervical cells really valid?

The significance of endocervical cylindrical cells (EC) as a criterion of sample adequacy has been established on 1,000 patients by comparing VCE smears (vaginal, cervical, endocervical) with or without EC in relation to prevalence of abnormal cells, prevalence of histological diagnosed lesions and sensitivity and negative predictive value of Pap smear, as well as by comparison of negative findings without EC with control smears with the aim of discovering overlooked lesions. A considerably greater yield of cytological (107/536 in relation to 49/464) and histological (105/536 in relation to 55/464) (p < 0.05) abnormalities in smears with EC support the hypothesis that the presence of EC is strongly and positively associated with prevalence of disease. In contrast, the presence of EC predicts only a moderate improvement in Pap smear quality with a weaker effect on sensitivity (95% in relation to 80%). During two-years monitoring of patients with negative Pap smear and negative colposcopy (403 with EC and 390 without EC in smears), no positive cytology/histology diagnosis was made. Also, because the prevalence of missed lesions among negative Pap smears is extremely low in absolute terms, no appreciable impact on negative predictive value was observed (98.8% in relation to 97.3%).     

Performance of the AutoPap Primary Screening System in the detection of high-risk cases in cervicovaginal smears

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of the AutoPap Primary Screening System (APSS) (TriPath Imaging, Inc., Burlington, North Carolina, U.S.A.) for the detection of high grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions and invasive cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 14,779 consecutive conventional Pap smears were processed by the APSS. All slides designated as "Review" by the device were manually screened according to the Bethesda System. The ranking scores obtained from the device were compared with the cytologic interpretations in all cases and with the final histologic diagnoses in the cases with cytologic severe abnormalities. RESULTS: The device classified 10,349 slides as Review (78%) and 2,912 (22%) as "No Further Review." In the 78% Review cases, the samples were ranked in descending order of potential abnormality, broken into quintiles. The correlation between the slide quintile ranks and the manual cytologic diagnosis indicated that 90% of abnormal smears were categorized by the device as in the first and second quintile rank, and the correlation between the rank report of the device and the histologic diagnosis showed that all cases of HSIL or invasive carcinoma were in the top two ranks. No significant abnormalities were observed in any of the smears categorized as No Further Review. CONCLUSION: This study confirmed the effectiveness of APSS for the detection of Pap smears with severe abnormalities.