Postsynaptic potentials in pacemaker cells: A correlate of behavior in command cells of an electric fish

Intracellular recordings were made from pacemaker-command cells of the electric organ discharge (EOD) of the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia virescens. The fish was immobilized with gallamine triethiodide (Flaxedil) which silenced the EOD. A simulated EOD of this fish (ca. 300 Hz) and a sine wave simulating a neighbor, a few Hz higher (+ΔF) or lower (-ΔF) were introduced into the bath to elicit the “jamming avoidance response” (JAR), monitored through the pacemaker potential. We observed that accompanying the JAR there is a minute hyperpolarizing postsynaptic potential (hpsp) superimposed on the pacemaker potential. A shift in the phase of the hpsp occurs with a change in the sign of ΔF, and therefore of the JAR. Assuming that the behaviorally correlated hpsp is inhibitory, it suggests that mutual inhibition may play a role in regulating the synchronous firing frequency of command neurons, which are electrically coupled with one-another. Scheich and Bullock (1974) proposed a neuronal scheme for the JAR in which they suggest that two systems (P and T) operate together in the nervous system. The T system affects the pacemaker cells at a precise, variable phase of the pacemaker cycle. Although the present results indeed reveal a shift in the hpsp with a change in the sign of ΔF, the actual significance of this shift remains to be evaluated. The unexpected direction of the shift suggests either that the hpsp is excitatory at the phases when it occurs, or that effectiveness of inhibition decreases at later phases in this case instead of increasing as in other cases, or that the hpsp opposes the JAR. The parallel P system is probably more important in explaining the JAR, acting by a DC level control rather than a phase control.     

EOD modulations of brown ghost electric fish: JARs, chirps, rises, and dips.

Weakly electric "wave" fish make highly regular electric organ discharges (EODs) for precise electrolocation. Yet, they modulate the ongoing rhythmicity of their EOD during social interactions. These modulations may last from a few milliseconds to tens of minutes. In this paper we describe the different types of EOD modulations, what they may signal to recipient fish, and how they are generated on a neural level. Our main conclusions, based on a species called the brown ghost (Apteronotus leptorhynchus) are that fish: (1) show sexual dimorphism in the signals that they generate; (2) make different signals depending on Whether they are interacting with a fish of the opposite sex or, within their own sex, to a fish of that which is dominant or subordinate to it; (3) are able to assess relative dominance from electrical cues; (4) have a type of plasticity in the pacemaker nucleus, the control center for the EOD, that occurs after stimulation of NMDA receptors that causes a long-lasting (tens of minutes to hours) change in EOD frequency; (5) that this NMDA receptor-dependent change may occur in reflexive responses, like the jamming avoidance response (JAR), as well as after certain long-lasting social signals. We propose that NMDA-receptor dependent increases in EOD frequency during the JAR adaptively shift the EOD frequency to a new value to avoid jamming by another fish and that such increases in EOD frequency during social encounters may be advantageous since social dominance seems to be positively correlated with EOD frequency in both sexes.     

Electrosensory phase sensitivity in the weakly electric fish Eigenmannia in the detection of signals similar to its own

The electric organ discharge (EOD) of the South American knifefish Eigenmannia sp. is a permanently present wave signal of usually constant amplitude and frequency (similar to a sine wave). A fish perceives discharges of other fish as a modulation of its own. At frequency identity (F = 0 Hz) the phase difference between a fish's own electric discharge and that of another fish affects the superimposed waveform. It was unclear whether or not the electrosensory stimulus-intensity threshold as behaviourally determined depends on the phase difference between a fish's own EOD and a sine-wave stimulus (at F = 0 Hz). Also the strength of the jamming avoidance response (JAR), a discharge frequency shift away from a stimulus that is sufficiently close to the EOD frequency, as a function of phase difference was studied. Sine-wave stimuli were both frequency-clamped and phase-locked to a fish's discharge frequency (F = 0 Hz). In food-rewarded fish, the electrosensory stimulus-intensity threshold depended significantly on the phase difference between a fish's discharge and the stimulus. Stimulus-intensity thresholds were low (down to 3 V/cm, peak-to-peak) when the superimposed complex wave changed such that the shift in zero-crossings times relative to the original EOD was large but amplitude change minimal; stimulus-intensity thresholds were high (up to 16.9 V/cm, peak-to-peak) when the shift in zero-crossings times was small but amplitude change maximal. Similar results were obtained for the non-conditioned JAR: at constant supra-threshold stimulus intensities and F = 0 Hz, the phase difference significantly affected the strength of the JAR, although variability between individuals was higher than that observed in the conditioned experiments.Abbreviations ACP active phase coupling - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response - F frequency (fish) — frequency (stimulus) [Hz] - p-p peak-to-peak     

The development of the Jamming Avoidance Response (JAR) in Eigenmannia: An innate behavior indeed

Summary In its Jamming Avoidance Response (JAR), the gymnotiform electric fish Eigenmannia shifts its electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency away from similar interfering frequencies. Continual behavioral measurements were carried out in 164 juvenile fish until a correct JAR emerged. Sixty-four of these fish were raised in complete isolation, the remainder in a community of their siblings. A correct JAR emerged in fish of 1.2–1.6 cm in body length, corresponding to a developmental age of 24–32 days. In 6 of 164 fish, the emergence of a correct JAR followed an interim appearance of an incorrect JAR, which involved frequency shifts in the direction opposite to those of a correct JAR. The fish raised in isolation developed the same forms of behavior and showed the same sequence in their appearance as did socially raised fish. This indicates that the JAR and its developmental schedule are innate. The appearance of an incorrect JAR suggests initial errors or incompleteness in the wiring of central nervous connections. A correct JAR ultimately emerged even if a stimulus regimen was offered that rewarded frequency shifts in the direction opposite to those of a correct JAR. This indicates that the development of the JAR is immune to experimental alterations of sensory experience.Abbreviations Df frequency difference between a jamming stimulus and fish's EOD - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - EO electric organ - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR Jamming Avoidance Response - nE nucleus electrosensorius - nE subnucleus of nE, causing drop of EOD frequency - nE subnucleus of nE, causing rise of EOD frequency - Pn pacemaker nucleus - PPn prepacemaker nucleus     

Species-specific differences in sensorimotor adaptation are correlated with differences in social structure

Here, we report a species difference in the strength and duration of long-term sensorimotor adaptation in the electromotor output of weakly electric fish. The adaptation is produced by changes in intrinsic excitability in the electromotor pacemaker nucleus; this change is a form of memory that correlates with social structure. A weakly electric fish may be jammed by a similar electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency of another fish and prevents jamming by transiently raising its own emission frequency, a behavior called the jamming avoidance response (JAR). The JAR requires activation of NMDA receptors, and prolonged JAR performance results in long-term frequency elevation (LTFE) of a fish’s EOD frequency for many hours after the jamming stimulus. We find that LTFE is stronger in a shoaling species (Eigenmannia virescens) with a higher probability of encountering jamming conspecifics, when compared to a solitary species (Apteronotus leptorhynchus). Additionally, LTFE persists in Eigenmannia, whereas, it decays over 5–9 h in Apteronotus.     

Sensory cues for the gradual frequency fall responses of the gymnotiform electric fish, Rhamphichthys rostratus

The sensory cues for a less known form of frequency shifting behavior, gradual frequency falls, of electric organ discharges (EODs) in a pulse-type gymnotiform electric fish, Rhamphichthys rostratus, were identified. We found that the gradual frequency fall occurs independently of more commonly observed momentary phase shifting behavior, and is due to perturbation of sensory feedback of the fish's own EODs by EODs of neighboring fish. The following components were identified as essential features in the signal mixture of the fish's own and the neighbor's EOD pulses: (1) the neighbor's pulses must be placed within a few millisecond of the fish's own pulses, (2) the neighbor's pulses, presented singly at low frequencies (0.2–4 Hz), were sufficient, (3) the frequency of individual pulse presentation must be below 4 Hz, (4) amplitude modulation of the sensory feedback of the fish's own pulses induced by such insertions of the neighbor's pulses must contain a high frequency component: sinusoidal amplitude modulation of the fish's own EOD feedback at these low frequencies does not induce gradual frequency falls. Differential stimulation across body surfaces, which is required for the jamming avoidance response (JAR) of wave-type gymnotiform electric fish, was not necessary for this behavior. We propose a cascade of high-pass and low-pass frequency filters within the amplitude processing pathway in the central nervous system as the mechanism of the gradual frequency fall response.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - f frequency of EOD or pacemaker command signal - JAR jamming avoidance response - S ₁ stimulus mimicking fish's own EOD - f ₁ frequency of S₁ - S ₂ stimulus mimicking neighbor's EOD - f ₂ frequency of S₂     

Dynamics and stimulus-dependence of pacemaker control during behavioral modulations in the weakly electric fish,Apteronotus

1. Weakly electric fish generate around their bodies low-amplitude, AC electric fields which are used both for the detection of objects and intraspecific communication. The types of modulation in this signal of which the high-frequency wave-type gymnotiform, Apteronotus, is capable are relatively few and stereotyped. Chief among these is the chirp, a signal used in courtship and agonistic displays. Chirps are brief and rapid accelerations in the normally highly regular electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency. 2. Chirping can be elicited artificially in these animals by the use of a stimulus regime identical to that typically used to elicit another behavior, the jamming avoidance response (JAR). The neuronal basis for the JAR, a much slower and lesser alteration in EOD frequency, is well understood. Examination of the stimulus features which induce chirping show that, like the JAR, there is a region of frequency differences between the fish's EOD and the interfering signal that maximally elicits the response. Moreover, the response is sex-specific with regard to the sign of the frequency difference, with females chirping preferentially on the positive and most males on the negative Df. These features imply that the sensory mechanisms involved in the triggering of these communicatory behaviors are fundamentally similar to those explicated for the JAR. 3. Additionally, two other modulatory behaviors of unknown significance are described. The first is a non-selective rise in EOD frequency associated with a JAR stimulus, occurring regardless of the sign of the Df. This modulation shares many characteristics with the JAR. The second behavior, which we have termed a 'yodel', is distinct from and kinetically intermediate to chirping and the JAR. Moreover, unlike the other studied electromotor behaviors it is generally produced only after the termination of the eliciting stimulus.     

Intracellular recording in the medullary pacemaker nucleus of the weakly electric fish,Apteronotus, during modulatory behaviors

1. The weakly electric gymnotiform fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus, can be induced to perform a variety of modulations of its quasi-sinusoidal, electric organ discharge (EOD) in acute physiological preparations. These modulations, many of which are communicatory in function, include the jamming avoidance response (JAR). We have recorded intracellularly from neurons of the medullary pacemaker nucleus which is responsible for maintaining the ongoing EOD frequency during these modulatory behaviors. 2. We have used dye-filled microelectrodes to characterize single cell morphology of the two types of cells in the pacemaker nucleus (relay and pacemaker cells) and to localize anatomically the site of the differing responses we see during frequency modulations. We have also recorded with KCl-filled electrodes and attributed these data to cell type and location on the basis of characteristic behavior during these modulations. 3. Much of our data deals with chirps, brief accelerations of the EOD frequency lasting 10 to 14 ms. We see distinct patterns of activity in the pacemaker nucleus corresponding to different anatomical locations: the relay cell soma and axon, and the pacemaker cell soma and axon. Most of these loci show a marked rise in baseline voltage during the acceleration in spike frequency. The most unusual of these is the pacemaker cell axon which displays an often extreme decline in spike amplitude concurrent with the chirp (Fig. 7A). 4. 'Yodeling' (Dye 1987) appears to involve similar, characteristic changes in the pattern of firing as those seen during chirping. Similar quantitative analyses suggest that the JAR involves a different mechanism, however.     

‘Recognition units’ at the top of a neuronal hierarchy?

The electric fish, Eigenmannia, is able to discriminate the sign of the frequency difference, Df, between a neighbor's electric organ discharges (EODs) and its own. The fish lowers its EOD frequency for positive Dfs and raises its frequency for negative Dfs to minimize jamming of its electrolocation ability by a neighbor's EODs of similar frequency. This jamming avoidance response (JAR) is controlled by a group of 'sign-selective' neurons in the prepacemaker nucleus (PPN) that is located at the boundary of the midbrain and the diencephalon (Fig. 1). Extracellular recordings from a total of 35 neurons revealed a great similarity between behavioral and neuronal response properties: 1. All neurons fired vigorously for negative Dfs and were almost silent for positive Dfs, regardless of the orientation of the jamming stimulus, and thus discriminated the sign of Df unambiguously (Fig. 2). 2. In accordance with behavioral observations, individual neurons failed to discriminate the sign of Df when the jamming stimulus had the same field geometry as the signal mimicking the animal's own EOD (Fig. 3). 3. Df magnitudes which evoke strongest JARs, usually 4 to 8 Hz, also induced most vigorous responses in sign-selective neurons (Fig. 5). 4. Behavioral and neuronal thresholds for the detection of small jamming signals were similar. Threshold for sign selectivity was reached when the amplitude ratio of the jamming signal to the EOD mimic, measured near the head surface, was 0.001. This value corresponds to a maximal temporal disparity (a necessary cue for performing a correct JAR) of 1 to 2 microseconds for signals received by the two sides of the body in a transverse jamming field (Fig. 7). 5. The effects of two jamming fields, offered orthogonally to each other, may interact nonlinearly at the behavioral as well as at the neuronal level. A positive Df presented in one field may suppress behavioral and neuronal responses to modulations of the sign of Df in the other field (Fig. 8c).     

Evidence for a direct effect of androgens upon electroreceptor tuning

Tuberous electroreceptors of individual wave type weakly electric fish are tuned to the fundamental frequency of that fish's electric organ discharge (EOD). EOD frequency and receptor best frequency (BF) are both lowered following systemic injection of 5-alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT). A previous study (Meyer et al. 1984) showed that the effect of DHT on the EOD generating circuitry was independent of an ongoing EOD and suggested that its effect on electroreceptor tuning was indirect, possibly mediated by the electric field. We have continued these studies to determine the factors which influence electroreceptor tuning. Baseline recordings of EOD frequency, receptor oscillations, and single afferent tuning curves were taken. After fish were electrically silenced by spinal cord transection they were injected daily with either DHT or saline or were implanted with either DHT-filled or empty silastic capsules. As previously reported, the EOD frequency (determined from pacemaker nucleus recordings) was lowered in DHT-treated, transected fish and increased in control fish. Similarly, receptor tuning was lowered in the DHT-treated, silenced fish. Oscillation frequencies decreased in both treated and control groups, but significantly more in the hormone group. Single afferent best frequencies were lowered in both DHT groups and raised in their respective control groups. In another series of experiments exogenous electric fields capable of driving receptors in a 1-to-1 phase-locked manner were placed around silenced fish. We were unable to elicit any shift in pacemaker frequency or electroreceptor tuning regardless of stimulus field geometry. Four transected fish were injected with DHT and placed in exogenous electric fields of higher frequency than their original EOD. Even in the presence of a higher frequency electric field, DHT lowered EOD frequency and afferent BF. We conclude that androgens produce effects both on the EOD generating circuitry, probably at the level of the pacemaker nucleus, and on electroreceptors, probably, ultimately, on receptor cell membrane conductances. These effects occur in parallel allowing the two parameters to remain well matched. In contrast to former predictions, exogenous electric fields alone appear unable to shift receptor tuning.     

From distributed sensory processing to discrete motor representations in the diencephalon of the electric fish,Eigenmannia

Summary During their jamming avoidance response (JAR), weakly electric fish of the genusEigenmannia shift their electric organ discharge (EOD) frequency away from a similar EOD frequency of a neighboring fish. The behavioral rules and neural substrates for stimulus recognition and motor control of the JAR have been extensively studied (see review by Heiligenberg 1986). The diencephalic nucleus electrosensorius (nE) links sensory processing within the torus semicircularis and optic tectum with the mesencephalic prepacemaker nucleus which, in turn, modulates the medullary pacemaker nucleus and hence the EOD frequency. Two separate areas within the nE responsible for JAR-related EOD frequency rises and frequency falls, respectively, were identified by iontophoresis of the excitatory amino acid L-glutamate. Bilateral lesion of the areas causing EOD frequency rises resulted in elimination of JAR-related frequency rises above a baseline frequency obtained in the absence of a jamming stimulus. Similarly, bilateral lesion of the areas causing frequency falls resulted in a loss of JAR-related frequency falls below the baseline frequency. Whether these areas are also responsible for non-JAR-related frequency shifts is not known. The strength of response and spatial extent of the areas causing frequency shifts varied among fish and also varied in individual fish, reflecting the strength of JAR-related frequency shifts and the balance of activities in frequency-rise and frequency-fall areas. Local application of bicuculline-methiodide or GABA demonstrated a tonic inhibitory input to each area and suggests a reciprocal inhibitory interaction between the two ipsilateral areas, possibly accounting for much of the individual plasticity.The nE thus is a site for neuronal transformation from distributed, topographically organized processing within the laminated structures of the torus and tectum to discrete cell clusters which control antagonistic motor responses.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response - Df difference frequency between jamming signal and the fish's own EOD - nE nucleus electrosensorius - PPn prepacemaker nucleus     

Interruption of pacemaker signals is mediated by GABAergic inhibition of the pacemaker nucleus in the African electric fish <Emphasis Type="Italic">Gymnarchus niloticus</Emphasis>

The wave-type African weakly electric fish Gymnarchus niloticus produces electric organ discharges (EODs) from an electric organ in the tail that is driven by a pacemaker complex in the medulla, which consists of a pacemaker nucleus, two lateral relay nuclei and a medial relay nucleus. The prepacemaker nucleus (PPn) in the area of the dorsal posterior nucleus of the thalamus projects exclusively to the pacemaker nucleus and is responsible for EOD interruption behavior. The goal of the present study is to test the existence of inhibition of the pacemaker nucleus by the PPn. Immunohistochemical results showed clear anti-GABA immunoreactive labeling of fibers and terminals in the pacemaker nucleus, but no apparent anti-glycine immunoreactivity anywhere in the pacemaker complex. GABA injection into the pacemaker nucleus could induce EOD interruptions that are comparable to the interruptions induced by glutamate injection into the PPn. Application of the GABA_A receptor blocker bicuculline methiodide reversibly eliminated the effects of stimulation of the PPn. Thus the EOD interruption behavior in Gymnarchus is mediated through GABAergic inhibition of the pacemaker nucleus by the PPn.     

Individual prepacemaker neurons can modulate the pacemaker cycle of the gymnotiform electric fish,Eigenmannia

Summary The prepacemaker nucleus (PPN) in the midbrain of the gymnotiform electric fishEigenmannia provides the only known neuronal input to the medullary pacemaker nucleus, which triggers each electric organ discharge (EOD) cycle by a single command pulse. Electrical stimulation of the PPN elicited two distinct forms of modulations in the pacemaker activity, brief accelerations, hence referred to as chirps, and gradual frequency shifts with a time constant of approximately one second. The associated EOD modulations were indistinguishable from natural communication signals. Depending upon the site of stimulation, the two forms of modulation could be elicited alone or superimposed (Fig. 1). Stimulation sites eliciting only chirps could be separated from sites eliciting only gradual shifts by as little as 60 m. The magnitude of the elicited chirps depended upon the timing of the pulse stimulus with reference to the phase of the pacemaker cycle (Figs. 2, 3).Extracellular and intracellular recordings of single PPN neurons revealed that an action potential from a single neuron generates a chirp, and that the magnitude of the chirp depends upon the timing of the action potential with reference to the phase of the pacemaker cycle (Figs. 4, 5). The spike activity of these neurons had no relation to the jamming avoidance response (JAR), suggesting independent neuronal mechanisms for chirps and the JAR. Depolarization of such neurons by current injection produced bursts of chirps (Fig. 6), and intracellular injection of Lucifer Yellow identified these cells as a large type of PPN neuron which could also be retrogradely labeled from the pacemaker with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (Fig. 7). We were unable to record from neurons linked to gradual shifts of the pacemaker frequency, although the JAR was elicited continually during the experiments. A smaller cell type of the PPN which can be retrogradely labeled with HRP but so far could not be recorded may control gradual frequency shifts.Abbreviations PPN prepacemaker nucleus - JAR jamming avoidance response - EOD electric organ discharge - Df neighbor's EOD frequency (or its mimic) minus animal's own EOD frequency (or its mimic)     

Communication in the weakly electric fish Sternopygus macrurus

Summary A classical conditioning paradigm was used to test the ability of Sternopygus macrurus to detect EOD-like stimuli (sine waves) of different frequencies. The behavioral tuning curves were quite close in shape to tuning curves based on single-unit recordings of T units, although the sensitivity at all frequencies was much greater. The behavioral curves showed notches of greatly reduced sensitivity when the test frequency was equal to, or twice the EOD frequency. The EOD of each of the fish was eliminated by lesioning the medullary pacemaker nucleus, and the fish were retested. The resulting tuning curves were nearly the same in shape as those of the EOD-intact individuals, but the PMN-lesioned fish showed an overall reduction of sensitivity of 30 dB. The EOD appears to enhance sensitivity by placing the summed stimulus (test stimulus + fish's EOD) at an amplitude where T units are maximally sensitive to small temporal modulations in the fish's own EOD. Peripheral tuning appears to limit the ability of males to detect the EOD of females, since these are, on average, an octave higher in frequency than the male EOD, while the peak sensitivity of the male occurs 5–10 Hz above its own EOD frequency.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - PMN pacemaker nucleus - BF best frequency - DF difference frequency     

Testosterone modulates female chirping behavior in the weakly electric fish,Apteronotus leptorhynchus

The weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus, produces a wave-like electric organ discharge (EOD) utilized for electrolocation and communication. Both sexes communicate by emitting chirps: transient increases in EOD frequency. In males, chirping behavior and the jamming avoidance response (JAR) can be evoked by an artificial EOD stimulus delivered to the water at frequencies 1–10 Hz below the animal's own EOD. In contrast, females rarely chirp in response to this stimulus even though they show consistent JARs. To investigate whether this behavioral difference is hormone dependent, we implanted females with testosterone (T) and monitored their chirping activity over a 5 week period. Our findings indicate that elevations in blood levels of T cause an enhancement of chirping behavior and a lowering of basal EOD frequency in females. Elevated blood levels of T also appear to modulate the quality of chirps produced by hormone treated females. The effects of T on female chirping behavior and basal EOD frequency appear specific, since the magnitude of the JAR was not affected by the hormonal treatment. These findings suggest that seasonal changes in circulating concentrations of T may regulate behavioral changes in female chirping behavior and basal EOD frequency.Abbreviations DHT dihydrotestosterone - E estradiol - EOD elecdric organ discharge - GSI gonadal size index - JAR jamming avoidance response - PPn prepacemaker nucleus - T testosterone     

Androgen modulates the kinetics of the delayed rectifying K+ current in the electric organ of a weakly electric fish

Weakly electric fish such as Sternopygus macrurus utilize a unique signal production system, the electric organ (EO), to navigate within their environment and to communicate with conspecifics. The electric organ discharge (EOD) generated by the Sternopygus electric organ is quasi-sinusoidal and sexually dimorphic; sexually mature males produce long duration EOD pulses at low frequencies, whereas mature females produce short duration EOD pulses at high frequencies. EOD frequency is set by a medullary pacemaker nucleus, while EOD pulse duration is determined by the kinetics of Na+ and K+ currents in the electric organ. The inactivation of the Na+ current and the activation of the delayed rectifying K+ current of the electric organ covary with EOD frequency such that the kinetics of both currents are faster in fish with high (female) EOD frequency than those with low (male) EOD frequencies. Dihydrotestosterone (DHT) implants masculinize the EOD centrally by decreasing frequency at the pacemaker nucleus (PMN). DHT also acts at the electric organ, broadening the EO pulse, which is at least partly due to a slowing of the inactivation kinetics of the Na+ current. Here, we show that chronic DHT treatment also slows the activation and deactivation kinetics of the electric organ's delayed rectifying K+ current. Thus, androgens coregulate the time-varying kinetics of two distinct ion currents in the EO to shape a sexually dimorphic communication signal.     

Stimulus discrimination in the diencephalon ofEigenmannia: the emergence and sharpening of a sensory filter

Summary Neuronal reliability and sensitivity to behaviorally relevant stimulus patterns were investigated in a higher-order nucleus of the diencephalon believed to participate in the jamming avoidance response (JAR) of the weakly electric fish,Eigenmannia. The fish raises or lowers its frequency of electric organ discharge (EOD) to minimize interference from a neighboring fish's EOD. Proper JARs require determination of the sign of the difference frequency (Df) between the neighboring fish's EOD and the fish's own EOD. Bastian and Yuthas (1984) recently described diencephalic neurons within the nucleus electrosensorius that are able to make this determination. In the present study, response properties of such neurons were compared with those of lower-level sign-selective cells found in the torus semicircularis and the optic tectum (Heiligenberg and Rose 1985) as well as with properties of the intact behavior.Most sign-selective cells within the nucleus electrosensorius show a high degree of selectivity for one sign of the difference frequency; cells with either sign preference were found in approximately equal numbers. The sign preference and the degree of sign selectivity is most often independent of the spatial orientation of the jamming stimulus. In contrast, the responses of toral and tectal cells are less robust and consistent and are often highly dependent on the geometry of the jamming stimulus.Determination of the sign of the difference frequency requires the analysis of amplitude modulations coupled with modulations in phase (timing) differences between pairs of areas of the body surface. The most sensitive cells recorded in the nucleus electrosensorius can determine the sign of the difference frequency with timing differences of 1 s or less, roughly comparable to the behavioral threshold of 400 ns (Carr et al. 1986). The best toral/tectal response required at least a 16 s modulation.Cells within the nucleus electrosensorius thus code the sign of Df with a high degree of reliability and sensitivity. Ambiguities persist, however, which suggest that single cells at this level cannot completely account for the behavioral discrimination. Additional processing may be necessary to transform a still primarily sensory code into a motor program for control of the JAR (Rose et al. 1988).Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jammning avoidance response - Df difference frequency between jamming signal and fish's own EOD - S ₁ sinusoidal EOD mimic of subject fish - S ₂ sinusoidal EOD mimic of neighbor     

Development of the jamming avoidance response and its morphological correlates in the gymnotiform electric fish,Eigenmannia

The electric fish, Eigenmannia, will smoothly shift the frequency of its electric organ discharge away from an interfering electric signal. This shift in frequency is called the jamming avoidance response (JAR). In this article, we analyze the behavioral development of the JAR and the anatomical development of structures critical for the performance of the JAR. The JAR first appears when juvenile Eigenmannia are approximately 1 month old, at a total length of 13–18 mm. We have found that the establishment of much of the sensory periphery and of central connections precedes the onset of the JAR. We describe three aspects of the behavioral development of the JAR: (a) the onset and development of the behavior is closely correlated with size, not age; (b) the magnitude (in Hz) of the JAR increases with size until the juveniles display values within the adult range (10–20 Hz) at a total length of 25–30 mm; and (3) the JAR does not require prior experience or exposure to electrical signals. Raised in total electrical isolation from the egg stage, animals tested at a total length of 25 mm performed a correct JAR when first exposed to the stimulus. We examine the development of anatomical areas important for the performance of the JAR: the peripheral electrosensory system (mechano- and electroreceptors and peripheral nerves); and central electrosensory pathways and nuclei [the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL), the lateral lemniscus, the torus semicircularis, and the pacemaker nucleus]. The first recognizable structures in the developing electrosensory system are the peripheral neurites of the anterior lateral line nerve. The afferent nerves are established by day 2, which is prior to the formation of receptors in the epidermis. Thus, the neurites wait for their targets. This sequence of events suggests that receptor formation may be induced by innervation of primordial cells within the epidermis. Mechanoreceptors are first formed between day 3 and 4, while electroreceptors are first formed on day 7. Electroreceptor multiplication is observed for the first time at an age of 25 days and correlates with the onset of the JAR. The somata of the anterior lateral line nerve ganglion project afferents out to peripheral electroreceptors and also send axons centrally into the ELL. The first electroreceptive axons invade the ELL by day 6, and presumably a rough somatotopic organization and segmentation within the ELL may arise as early as day 7. Axonal projections from the ELL to the torus develop after day 18. Within the torus semicircularis, giant cells are necessary for the performance of the JAR. Giant cell numbers increase exponentially during development and the onset of the JAR coincides with a minimum of at least 150 giant cells and the attainment of a total length of at least 15 mm and at least 150 giant cells. Pacemaker and relay cells comprise the adult Eigenmannia pacemaker nucleus. The growth and differentiation of these cell types also correlates with the onset of the JAR in developing animals. We describe a gradual improvement of sensory abilities, as opposed to an explosive onset of the mature JAR. We further suggest that this may be a rule common in most developing behavioral systems. © 1992 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Discrimination of the sign of frequency differences bySternopygus,an electric fish without a jamming avoidance response

Several species of weakly electric fish reflexively change their frequency of electric organ discharge (EOD) in response to sensing signals of similar frequency from conspecifics; that is, they exhibit jamming avoidance responses (JAR).Eigenmannia increases its EOD frequency if jammed by a signal of lower frequency and decreases its EOD frequency if jammed by a signal of higher frequency. This discrimination is based on an analysis of the patterns of amplitude modulations and phase differences resulting from signal interference. Fish of the closely related genus,Sternopygus, however, do not exhibit a JAR. Here we show that despite lacking this behavior,Sternopygus shares many sensory processing capacities withEigenmannia:

Androgens alter electric organ discharge pulse duration despite stability in electric organ discharge frequency.

Weakly electric fish in the genus Sternopygus emit a sinusoidal, individually distinct, and sexually dimorphic electric organ discharge (EOD) that is used in electrolocation and communication. Systemically applied androgens decrease EOD frequency, which is set by a medullary pacemaker nucleus, and increase pulse duration, which is determined by the cells of the electric organ (the electrocytes), in a coordinated fashion. One possibility is that androgens broaden the EOD pulse duration by acting on the pacemaker neurons, thereby effecting a change in pacemaker firing frequency, and that the change in EOD pulse duration is due to an activity-dependent process. To determine whether androgens can alter pulse duration despite a stable pacemaker nucleus firing frequency, we implanted small doses of dihydrotestosterone in the electric organ. We found that androgen implants increased EOD pulse duration, but did not influence EOD frequency. In addition, using immunocytochemistry, we found that electrocytes label positively with an androgen receptor antibody. While it is not known on which cells androgens act directly, together these experiments suggest that they likely act on the electrocytes to increase EOD pulse duration. Since pulse duration is determined by electrocyte action potential duration and ionic current kinetics, androgens may therefore play a causative role in influencing individual variation and sexual dimorphism in electrocyte electrical excitability, an important component of electrocommunicatory behavior.