Induced systemic resistance (ISR) against pathogens – a promising field for ecological research

Putative fitness costs provide an explanation for why ISR is induced instead of constitutive, and they might constrain the use of ISR as preventative protection of cultivated plants. Though ISR is mainly elicited by and effective against pathogens, further biotic agents such as leaf-chewing herbivores, leaf miners, aphids and even non-pathogenic root-colonising bacteria can induce systemic pathogen resistance, while some ISR traits can have a defensive effect against herbivores. ‘Cross-resistance’ elicited by and effective against non-microbial plant enemies thus might add significantly to the function of ISR. On the other hand, ‘trade-offs” have been reported, i.e. increased susceptibility to herbivores in ISR-expressing plants. Finally, ISR is a rather unspecific response, being active against different microbes. It thus might have effects on mutualistic bacteria and fungi, too. The question of how expression of ISR affects the large variety of mutualistic and antagonistic plant-microbe and plant-insect interactions cannot yet be answered. This knowledge is, however, needed to obtain a risk assessment for the use of chemically induced or genetically engineered ISR in crop protection. This review aims to provide an overview and to highlight some of the many open questions which require intensive ecological research.     

高等植物病原相关蛋白

在过去的三十年中,人们对诱导系统性抗性——这一普遍存在于高等植物抗病过程中的现象——进行了深入研究。被真菌、细菌或病毒侵染后,植物表现出广泛的、长时间的系统性抗性。在这一过程中,植物细胞壁组成成分发生改变,表达各种病原相关蛋白(PR蛋白),并合成多种植物抗毒素。本文就主要的PR蛋白家族的结构和功能特性,PR蛋白的发现和分类,及PR蛋白的应用作一综述。     

The Arabidopsis ISR1 Locus is Required for Rhizobacteria-Mediated Induced Systemic Resistance Against Different Pathogens

Abstract: In Arabidopsis thaliana, non-pathogenic, root-colonizing Pseudomonas fluorescens WCS417r bacteria trigger an induced systemic resistance (ISR) that is phenotypically similar to pathogen-induced systemic acquired resistance (SAR). In contrast to SAR, WCS417r-mediated ISR is controlled by a salicylic acid (SA)-independent signalling pathway that requires an intact response to the plant hormones jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene (ET). Arabidopsis accessions RLD1 and Ws-0 fail to express ISR against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato and show enhanced disease susceptibility to this pathogen. Genetic analysis of progeny from crosses between WCS417r-responsive and non-responsive accessions demonstrated that ISR inducibility and basal resistance against P. syringae pv. tomato are controlled by a single dominant locus (ISR1) on chromosome III (Ton et al., 1999^[294]). Here, we investigated the role of the ISR1 locus in ISR, SAR and basal resistance against three additional pathogens: Xanthomonas campestris pv. armoraciae, Peronospora parasitica and turnip crinkle virus (TCV), using accessions Col-0 (ISR1), RLD1 (isr1) and Ws-0 (isr1) as host plants.     

Signalling in Rhizobacteria-Induced Systemic Resistance in Arabidopsis thaliana

Abstract: To protect themselves from disease, plants have evolved sophisticated defence mechanisms in which the signal molecules salicylic acid, jasmonic acid and ethylene often play crucial roles. Elucidation of signalling pathways controlling disease resistance is a major objective in research on plant-pathogen interactions. The capacity of a plant to develop a broad spectrum, systemic acquired resistance (SAR) after primary infection with a necrotizing pathogen is well-known and its signal transduction pathway extensively studied. Plants of which the roots have been colonized by specific strains of non-pathogenic fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. develop a phenotypically similar form of protection that is called rhizobacteria-mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR). In contrast to pathogen-induced SAR, which is regulated by salicylic acid, rhizobacteria-mediated ISR is controlled by a signalling pathway in which jasmonic acid and ethylene play key roles. In the past eight years, the model plant species Arabidopsis thaliana was explored to study the molecular basis of rhizobacteria-mediated ISR. Here we review current knowledge of the signal transduction steps involved in the ISR pathway that leads from recognition of the rhizobacteria in the roots to systemic expression of broad-spectrum disease resistance in aboveground foliar tissues.     

微生物诱导的植物系统抗性

综述了由植物病原菌和非病原性的根际促生菌诱导产生的两种植物系统抗性:系统获得性抗性(SAR)和系统诱导抗性(ISR),比较了两类系统抗性的诱导、信号分子和机理的异同点,阐述了信号分子水杨酸在系统获得性抗性诱导过程中的作用及茉莉酸和乙烯在系统诱导抗性产生过程中的作用。     

生防菌诱导植物系统抗性及其生化和细胞学机制

生防菌通常可利用竞争、抗生、寄生和交叉保护等直接的拮抗机制抑制植物病害;同时某些生防菌还能促进植物生长,诱导植物对真菌、细菌和病毒引起的病害乃至对线虫和昆虫为害的抗性,称为诱导系统抗性(ISR).ISR具有非特异性、广谱性和系统性,其在表型上与病原菌侵染激发的系统获得抗性(SAR)相似,具有同样的效率;但在寄主植物上不发生过敏性坏死反应(HR),无可见症状,为发展和改善更加安全而环境友好的植物保护策略开辟了新的思路.本文总结了生防真菌和细菌诱导系统抗性及其激发子和信号转导途径等方面的研究进展,重点阐述了寄主防御反应的生化和细胞学机制,并对ISR在植物病害生物防治中的应用前景进行了展望.     

Nitric oxide functions as a signal in induced systemic resistance

The study was aimed to search out the probable molecule behind the activation of a broad spectrum resistance during Pseudomonas aeruginosa WS-1 mediated induced systemic resistance (ISR) in Capsicum annuum where plants were challenged inoculated with its pathogen Colletotrichum capsici 24 h after induction of ISR. On the fourth day after pathogen inoculation a significant increase of pathogenesis-related (PR) proteins, other defence enzymes and phenolics as well as a two-fold increase of nitric oxide (NO) a potent defence signalling molecule were observed. Treatment of the host with NO donor also induced the same defence molecule in a similar manner. Results suggest the possible signalling role of NO in ISR during crosstalk between ISR inducing agent and pathogen within the host system.     

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 represses plant miR846 to induce systemic resistance via a jasmonic acid‐dependent signalling pathway

Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 is a type of plant growth‐promoting rhizobacterium (PGPR) which activates induced systemic resistance (ISR) in Arabidopsis. Blocking of the synthesis of cyclic lipopeptides and 2,3‐butanediol by FZB42, which have been demonstrated to be involved in the priming of ISR, results in the abolishment of the plant defence responses. To further clarify the ISR activated by PGPRs at the microRNA (miRNA) level, small RNA (sRNA) libraries from Arabidopsis leaves after root irrigation with FZB42, FZB42ΔsfpΔalsS and control were constructed and sequenced. After fold change selection, promoter analysis and target prediction, miR846‐5p and miR846‐3p from the same precursor were selected as candidate ISR‐associated miRNAs. miR846 belongs to the non‐conserved miRNAs, specifically exists in Arabidopsis and its function in the plant defence response remains unclear. The disease severity of transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing miR846 (OEmiR846) or knockdown miR846 (STTM846) against Pseudomonas syringae DC3000 suggests that the miR846 expression level in Arabidopsis is negatively correlated with disease resistance. Moreover, miR846 in Arabidopsis Col‐0 is repressed after methyl jasmonate treatment. In addition, jasmonic acid (JA) signalling‐related genes are up‐regulated in STTM846, and the stomatal apertures of STTM846 are also less than those in Arabidopsis Col‐0 after methyl jasmonate treatment. Furthermore, the disease resistance of STTM846 transgenic Arabidopsis against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst DC3000) is blocked by the addition of the JA biosynthetic inhibitor diethyldiethiocarbamic acid (DIECA). Taken together, our results suggest that B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42 inoculation suppresses miR846 expression to induce Arabidopsis systemic resistance via a JA‐dependent signalling pathway.     

Role of ethylene signalling in growth and systemic resistance induction by the plant growth‐promoting fungus Penicillium viridicatum in Arabidopsis

The plant growth‐promoting fungi (PGPF) have long been known to improve plant growth and suppress plant diseases. The PGPF Penicillium viridicatum GP15‐1 elicited plant growth and induced systemic resistance (ISR) in Arabidopsis thaliana against Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 (Pst), leading to a restriction of pathogen growth and disease development. Examination of local and systemic genes indicated that GP15‐1 did not modulate the expression of any of the tested defence‐related marker genes involved in salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene signalling pathways. Subsequent challenge of GP15‐1‐colonized plants with Pst bacterium primed Arabidopsis plants for enhanced activation of the JA‐inducible Atvsp (vegetative storage protein) gene at a later stage of infection. To assess the contribution of different signalling pathways in GP15‐1‐elicited plant growth and ISR, Arabidopsis genotypes implicated in SA signalling expressing the nahG transgene (NahG) or carrying disruption in NPR1 (npr1), JA signalling (jar1) and ethylene signalling (ein2) were tested. The GP15‐1‐induced plant growth and ISR were fully compromised in an ein2 mutation. Root colonization assay revealed that the inability of the ein2 mutant to express GP15‐1‐induced plant growth and ISR was not associated with reduced root colonization by GP15‐1. In conclusion, our results demonstrate the ethylene signalling pathway is involved in plant growth promotion and ISR elicitation by the PGPF P. viridicatum GP15‐1 in Arabidopsis. These results provide evidence that ethylene signalling has a substantial role in plant growth and disease resistance.     

Chemical-based resistance of Brassica oleracea and Rorippa dubia in response to Spodoptera litura attack

A plant's chemical-based resistance against insects can be characterized by an accumulation of phytochemicals that can severely harm or deter the generalist and non-adapted specialist insects. In the absence of an herbivore threat, plants maintain a basic concentration of defensive compounds as a constitutive resistance mechanism. On the other hand, plants are capable of sharply increasing their production of defensive compounds as induced defence in response to herbivore attacks. In this study, we highlight the role of chemical-based defence by comparing the constitutive and herbivore-induced resistances of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var. botrytis L.) and yellow cress (Rorippa dubia (Persoon)) with respect to time-dependent changes of phytochemicals that directly influence the performance of the generalist herbivore insect, Spodoptera litura (Fabricius ) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). The results of the study showed that both plant species were able to switch, albeit different degrees, between constitutive and induced resistances to combat herbivore attack. Brassica oleracea amassed lesser defensive compounds of constitutive resistance (trypsin inhibitor, polyphenol oxidase and sinigrin) than R. dubia. This led to a higher relative growth rate (RGR) of the S. litura larvae fed on cauliflower than in those fed on yellow cress. Brassica oleracea also demonstrated a lower induced response capability than R. dubia in its production of allelochemicals in herbivore-induced resistances. This was shown by the decrease of the RGR of larvae fed on induced foliage of the cauliflower compared to those fed on yellow cress. These results of the study proved and added to the belief that modern crop variety is not only lower in constitutive resistance but also weaker in induced resistance capability against herbivores, which is likely to be an effect of domestication even Rorippa and Brassica are relatively far from each other in Brassicaceae phylogeny.     

Signal transduction downstream of salicylic and jasmonic acid in herbivory-induced parasitoid attraction by Arabidopsis is independent of JAR1 and NPR1

Plants can defend themselves indirectly against herbivores by emitting a volatile blend upon herbivory that attracts the natural enemies of these herbivores, either predators or parasitoids. Although signal transduction in plants from herbivory to induced volatile production depends on jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA), the pathways downstream of JA and SA are unknown. Use of Arabidopsis provides a unique possibility to study signal transduction by use of signalling mutants, which so far has not been exploited in studies on indirect plant defence. In the present study it was demonstrated that jar1‐1 and npr1‐1 mutants are not affected in caterpillar (Pieris rapae)‐induced attraction of the parasitoid Cotesia rubecula. Both JAR1 and NPR1 (also known as NIM1) are involved in signalling downstream of JA in induced defence against pathogens such as induced systemic resistance (ISR). NPR1 is also involved in signalling downstream of SA in defence against pathogens such as systemic acquired resistance (SAR). These results demonstrate that signalling downstream of JA and SA differs between induced indirect defence against herbivores and defence against pathogens such as SAR and ISR. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that herbivore‐derived elicitors are involved in induced attraction of the parasitoid Cotesia rubecula     

Induced systemic resistance (ISR) in plants: mechanism of action

Plants possess a range of active defense apparatuses that can be actively expressed in response to biotic stresses (pathogens and parasites) of various scales (ranging from microscopic viruses to phytophagous insect). The timing of this defense response is critical and reflects on the difference between coping and succumbing to such biotic challenge of necrotizing pathogens/parasites. If defense mechanisms are triggered by a stimulus prior to infection by a plant pathogen, disease can be reduced. Induced resistance is a state of enhanced defensive capacity developed by a plant when appropriately stimulated. Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) and induced systemic resistance (ISR) are two forms of induced resistance wherein plant defenses are preconditioned by prior infection or treatment that results in resistance against subsequent challenge by a pathogen or parasite. Selected strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) suppress diseases by antagonism between the bacteria and soil-borne pathogens as well as by inducing a systemic resistance in plant against both root and foliar pathogens. Rhizobacteria mediated ISR resembles that of pathogen induced SAR in that both types of induced resistance render uninfected plant parts more resistant towards a broad spectrum of plant pathogens. Several rhizobacteria trigger the salicylic acid (SA)-dependent SAR pathway by producing SA at the root surface whereas other rhizobacteria trigger different signaling pathway independent of SA. The existence of SA-independent ISR pathway has been studied in Arabidopsis thaliana, which is dependent on jasmonic acid (JA) and ethylene signaling. Specific Pseudomonas strains induce systemic resistance in viz., carnation, cucumber, radish, tobacco, and Arabidopsis, as evidenced by an enhanced defensive capacity upon challenge inoculation. Combination of ISR and SAR can increase protection against pathogens that are resisted through both pathways besides extended protection to a broader spectrum of pathogens than ISR/SAR alone. Beside Pseudomonas strains, ISR is conducted by Bacillus spp. wherein published results show that several specific strains of species B. amyloliquifaciens, B. subtilis, B. pasteurii, B. cereus, B. pumilus, B. mycoides, and B.sphaericus elicit significant reduction in the incidence or severity of various diseases on a diversity of hosts.     

The toolbox of Trichoderma spp. in the biocontrol of Botrytis cinerea disease

Botrytis cinerea is a necrotrophic fungal pathogen causing disease in many plant species, leading to economically important crop losses. So far, fungicides have been widely used to control this pathogen. However, in addition to their detrimental effects on the environment and potential risks for human health, increasing fungicide resistance has been observed in the B. cinerea population. Biological control, that is the application of microbial organisms to reduce disease, has gained importance as an alternative or complementary approach to fungicides. In this respect, the genus Trichoderma constitutes a promising pool of organisms with potential for B. cinerea control. In the first part of this article, we review the specific mechanisms involved in the direct interaction between the two fungi, including mycoparasitism, the production of antimicrobial compounds and enzymes (collectively called antagonism), and competition for nutrients and space. In addition, biocontrol has also been observed when Trichoderma is physically separated from the pathogen, thus implying an indirect systemic plant defence response. Therefore, in the second part, we describe the consecutive steps leading to induced systemic resistance (ISR), starting with the initial Trichoderma–plant interaction and followed by the activation of downstream signal transduction pathways and, ultimately, the defence response resulting in ISR (ISR‐prime phase). Finally, we discuss the ISR‐boost phase, representing the effect of ISR priming by Trichoderma spp. on plant responses after additional challenge with B. cinerea.     

Induced systemic resistance in tomato by non-pathogenic Fusarium species for the management of Fusarium wilt

Isolates of non-pathogenic Fusarium moniliforme (Fu3, Fu7 and Fu24), F. oxysporum (Fu2, Fu4), F. solani (Fu25) and F. merismoides (Fu1) that were found to be effective in reducing wilt incidence in tomato were tested for their potential to elicit induced systemic resistance (ISR) in tomato. Talc formulations of these isolates derived from liquid fermentation as well as cell elicitors of these cultures were tested. Changes in the phenol and total protein contents and activities of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase were studied. Isolate Fu3 induced more phenol and total protein contents as well as activities of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase. Elicitors of Fu2 induced more of these compounds and enzymes. Although Fu1, Fu4 and Fu24 were found to give good control against Fusarium wilt incidence in an earlier study, they were less effective in inducing these defense related compounds. Peroxidase activity was increased when plants were treated with Fu3, Fu4, Fu7, Fu24 and Fu25, whereas polyphenol oxidase activity was increased only with the isolate Fu3 and elicitor of Fu2. It is suggested that ISR was the mode of action for the isolates Fu2 and Fu3, whereas for the other isolates, the mode of action may be root colonisation, competition for nutrition and so on. The role of ISR with non-pathogenic isolates of Fusarium spp. is discussed.     

The antagonistic strain Bacillus subtilis UMAF6639 also confers protection to melon plants against cucurbit powdery mildew by activation of jasmonate-and salicylic acid-dependent defence responses

Biological control of plant diseases has gained acceptance in recent years. Bacillus subtilis UMAF6639 is an antagonistic strain specifically selected for the efficient control of the cucurbit powdery mildew fungus Podosphaera fusca, which is a major threat to cucurbits worldwide. The antagonistic activity relies on the production of the antifungal compounds iturin and fengycin. In a previous study, we found that UMAF6639 was able to induce systemic resistance (ISR) in melon and provide additional protection against powdery mildew. In the present work, we further investigated in detail this second mechanism of biocontrol by UMAF6639. First, we examined the signalling pathways elicited by UMAF6639 in melon plants, as well as the defence mechanisms activated in response to P. fusca. Second, we analysed the role of the lipopeptides produced by UMAF6639 as potential determinants for ISR activation. Our results demonstrated that UMAF6639 confers protection against cucurbit powdery mildew by activation of jasmonate- and salicylic acid-dependent defence responses, which include the production of reactive oxygen species and cell wall reinforcement. We also showed that surfactin lipopeptide is a major determinant for stimulation of the immune response. These results reinforce the biotechnological potential of UMAF6639 as a biological control agent.     

Induction of resistance against pathogens by β-aminobutyric acid

Among the many types of plant stressors, pathogen attack, mainly fungi and bacteria can cause particularly severe damage both to individual plants and, on a wider scale, to agricultural productivity. The magnitude of these pathogen-induced problems has stimulated rapid progress in green biotechnology research into plant defense mechanisms. Plants can develop local and systemic wide-spectrum resistance induced by their exposure to virulent (systemic acquired resistance—SAR) or non-pathogenic microbes and various chemical elicitors (induced systemic resistance—ISR). β-Aminobutyric acid (BABA), non-protein amino acid, is though to be important component of the signaling pathway regulating ISR response in plants. After treatment with BABA or various chemicals, after infection by a necrotizing pathogen, colonization of the roots by beneficial microbes many plants establish a unique physiological state that is called the “primed” state of the plant. This review will focus on the recent knowledge about the role of BABA in the induction of ISR against pathogens mainly against fungi.     

一种改进的诱发拟南芥产生系统抗病性的方法

报告了诱发拟南芥产生系统抗性的改进的方法。通过直接用荧光假单胞菌(Pseudomonas fluores-cent)M18菌悬液浇灌植株根际代替收集菌体与土壤混合的方法、以直接播种替代移苗以及以病原菌喷雾接种法替代蘸叶接种法,在拟南芥(Arabidopsis thali-ana)生态型Columbia中,有效地建立了诱导性系统抗性(induced systemic resistance,ISR)的实验模式。这种改进的方法简化了操作步骤,缩短了试验周期,使大规模筛选ISR突变体成为可能,同时还能避免因移栽引起的各种其他抗性反应的干扰。