Conserved Residues in the UL24 Protein of Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Are Important for Dispersal of the Nucleolar Protein Nucleolin

The UL24 family of proteins is widely conserved among herpesviruses. We demonstrated previously that UL24 of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is important for the dispersal of nucleolin from nucleolar foci throughout the nuclei of infected cells. Furthermore, the N-terminal portion of UL24 localizes to nuclei and can disperse nucleolin in the absence of any other viral proteins. In this study, we tested the hypothesis that highly conserved residues in UL24 are important for the ability of the protein to modify the nuclear distribution of nucleolin. We constructed a panel of substitution mutations in UL24 and tested their effects on nucleolin staining patterns. We found that modified UL24 proteins exhibited a range of subcellular distributions. Mutations associated with a wild-type localization pattern for UL24 correlated with high levels of nucleolin dispersal. Interestingly, mutations targeting two regions, namely, within the first homology domain and overlapping or near the previously identified PD-(D/E)XK endonuclease motif, caused the most altered UL24 localization pattern and the most drastic reduction in its ability to disperse nucleolin. Viral mutants corresponding to the substitutions G121A and E99A/K101A both exhibited a syncytial plaque phenotype at 39°C. vUL24-E99A/K101A replicated to lower titers than did vUL24-G121A or KOS. Furthermore, the E99A/K101A mutation caused the greatest impairment of HSV-1-induced dispersal of nucleolin. Our results identified residues in UL24 that are critical for the ability of UL24 to alter nucleoli and further support the notion that the endonuclease motif is important for the function of UL24 during infection.The UL24 protein is conserved throughout the Herpesviridae family, and to the best of our knowledge, a UL24 homolog has been identified in all Herpesvirales genomes sequenced to date with the exception of the channel catfish virus (9, 10, 19). UL24 of herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) is required for efficient virus replication both in vitro and in vivo and for reactivation from latency in a mouse model of ocular infection (18). UL24 is one of the few HSV-1 genes, along with gB, gK, and UL20, in which mutations have been identified that cause the formation of syncytial plaques (2, 7, 34, 36, 39). The UL24-associated syncytial phenotype is only partially penetrant at 37°C but is fully penetrant at 39°C. Indications are that gK and UL20 have an inhibitory effect on the formation of syncytia (1), while certain mutations in gB entrain an uncontrolled fusogenic activity (11, 13, 15).UL24 is a highly basic protein of 269 amino acids that is expressed with leaky-late kinetics (31). Five homology domains (HDs), which consist of stretches of amino acids with a high percentage of identity between homologs, are present in the UL24 open reading frame (ORF) (19). In addition, a PD-(D/E)XK endonuclease motif has been identified that falls within the HDs (20); however, a role for this motif has yet to be demonstrated. In infected cells, UL24 is detected in the nucleus and the cytoplasm and transiently localizes to nucleoli (23). In the absence of other viral proteins, UL24 accumulates in the Golgi apparatus and in the nucleus, where it usually exhibits a diffuse staining pattern, but in a minority of cells it is detected in nucleoli (3).During infection, the formation of the viral replication compartments in the nucleus and the action of several viral proteins result in a remodeling of the nucleus. Chromatin is marginalized (29, 40), promyelocytic leukemia bodies are dispersed (26, 27), and the nuclear lamina is disrupted (33, 37). HSV-1 infection also affects the nucleolus, a prominent nuclear substructure implicated in the synthesis of rRNA, cell cycle regulation, and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling (5). Nucleoli become elongated following infection, and the synthesis of mature rRNA is reduced (4, 38, 42). Several HSV-1 proteins have been shown to localize to, or associate with, the nucleolus (12). The viral protein VP22 associates with the nucleolus and with dispersed nucleolin in HSV-1-infected cells (22), and RL1, US11, and ICP0 have also been shown to localize to nucleoli (24, 30, 35). Previously we showed that nucleolin is dispersed throughout the nucleus upon HSV-1 infection and that UL24 is involved in this nuclear modification (23). We further found that the N-terminal portion of UL24 is sufficient to induce the redistribution of nucleolin in the absence of other viral proteins (3).In this study, we sought to test the hypothesis that the endonuclease motif, which is made up of some of the most highly conserved residues in UL24, is important for the dispersal of nucleolin. A panel of substitution mutations in UL24 was generated, and the impact on the function of UL24 was assessed.     

Analysis of the Functions of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Regulatory Protein ICP0 That Are Critical for Lytic Infection and Derepression of Quiescent Viral Genomes

Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) immediate-early regulatory protein ICP0 is important for stimulating the initiation of the lytic cycle and efficient reactivation of latent or quiescent infection. Extensive investigation has suggested several potential functions for ICP0, including interference in the interferon response, disruption of functions connected with PML nuclear bodies (ND10), and inhibition of cellular histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity through an interaction with the HDAC-1 binding partner CoREST. Analysis of the significance of these potential functions and whether they are direct or indirect effects of ICP0 is complicated because HSV-1 mutants expressing mutant forms of ICP0 infect cells with widely differing efficiencies. On the other hand, transfection approaches for ICP0 expression do not allow studies of whole cell populations because of their limited efficiency. To overcome these problems, we have established a cell line in which ICP0 expression can be induced at levels pertaining during the early stages of HSV-1 infection in virtually all cells in the culture. Such cells enable 100% complementation of ICP0-null mutant HSV-1. Using cells expressing the wild type and a variety of mutant forms of ICP0, we have used this system to analyze the role of defined domains of the protein in stimulating lytic infection and derepression from quiescence. Activity in these core functions correlated well the ability of ICP0 to disrupt ND10 and inhibit the recruitment of ND10 proteins to sites closely associated with viral genomes at the onset of infection, whereas the CoREST binding region was neither sufficient nor necessary for ICP0 function in lytic and reactivating infections.Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is an important human pathogen that infects the majority of the population at an early age and then establishes a life-long latent infection in sensory neurones. Periodic reactivation of latent virus causes episodes of active disease characterized by epithelial lesions at the site of the original primary infection. As with all herpesviruses, the ability of HSV-1 to establish and reactivate from latency is key to its clinical importance and evolutionary success. Therefore, the molecular mechanisms that regulate these processes have been the subject of intensive research (reviewed in reference 15). HSV-1 immediate-early (IE) protein ICP0 is required for efficient reactivation from latency in both mouse models and cultured cell systems of quiescent infection (15). ICP0 is also required to stimulate lytic infection by enhancing the probability that a cell receiving a viral genome will engage in productive infection (reviewed in references 19, 20 and 42). Therefore, a full understanding of the biology of HSV-1 infection requires a definition of the functions and mode of action of ICP0.The basic phenotype of ICP0-null mutant HSV-1 is a low probability of plaque formation, particularly in human diploid fibroblasts, that causes a high particle-to-PFU ratio (reference 20 and references therein). Biochemically, ICP0 is an E3 ubiquitin ligase of the RING finger class (4) that induces the degradation of several cellular proteins, including the promyelocytic leukemia (PML) protein (23), centromere proteins including CENP-C (54, 55), and the catalytic subunit of DNA-protein kinase (53, 72). Among the consequences of these activities are the disruption of PML nuclear bodies (herein termed nuclear domain 10 [ND10]) (24, 58) and centromeres (54). ICP0 has also been reported to interact with histone deacetylase enzymes (HDACs) (56) and the CoREST repressor protein, thereby disrupting the CoREST/HDAC-1 complex (37, 39). Evidence has also been presented that expression of ICP0 correlates with increased acetylation of histones on viral chromatin (12). ICP0-null mutant viruses replicate less efficiently than the wild type (wt) in cells pretreated with interferon (IFN) (44, 66), and there is evidence that ICP0 is able to impede an IFN-independent induction of IFN-stimulated genes that arises after infection with defective HSV-1 mutants (16, 59, 60, 65, 67, 76). As a further complication, ICP0-null mutant HSV-1 replicates more efficiently in cells that have been highly stressed by a variety of treatments (5, 6, 79).On the basis of this evidence, several not necessarily mutually exclusive hypotheses have been put forward to explain the biological effects of ICP0. These include (i) that ICP0 counteracts an intrinsic cellular resistance mechanism that involves PML and other components of ND10, (ii) that ICP0 overcomes the innate cellular antiviral defense based on the IFN pathway, and (iii) that ICP0 counteracts the establishment of a repressed chromatin structure on the viral genome by interfering with histone deacetylation. The aim of this paper is to investigate some of these issues using a novel inducible expression system. The question of the effects of ICP0 on IFN pathways is considered in the companion paper (28).The brief and by no means exhaustive summary of the functions and activities attributed to ICP0, presented above, illustrates that the understanding of ICP0 is a difficult issue. It is further complicated by the difficulty of working with ICP0-null mutant viruses under tightly controlled conditions. This arises because the defect varies greatly between different cell types, is highly dependent on the multiplicity of infection (MOI), and varies in a nonlinear manner with respect to virus dose (reference 20 and references therein). Furthermore, use of ICP0 mutant viruses in cultured cell models of reactivation of quiescent HSV-1 is complicated by competition between the resident quiescent viral genome targeted for reactivation and the genomes of the superinfecting virus used to induce the reactivation (75). Therefore, it is very difficult to establish infections with wt and ICP0 mutant viruses that are truly comparable in a way that allows clear distinctions between the direct effects of ICP0 and indirect effects that are due either to expression of other viral proteins that are expressed more efficiently in the presence of ICP0 or to less specific consequences of an active infection and subsequent effects on the cell. Here, we describe a system that enables expression of ICP0 in an inducible manner at levels similar to those at the early stages of infection in almost all cells in a population. We have used this system to study wt and mutant forms of ICP0 in assays of lytic infection and derepression of quiescent viral genomes in a cultured cell model of latency. We discuss the results in terms of the requirements of specific regions of the ICP0 protein for stimulating lytic infection and derepression of quiescent genomes, the potential biological significance of ND10 disruption, recruitment of ND10 components to the sites of HSV-1 genomes at the outset of virus infection, and the interaction of ICP0 with CoREST.     

Antibodies Are Required for Complete Vaccine-Induced Protection against Herpes Simplex Virus 2

Herpes simplex virus 2 (HSV-2) 0ΔNLS is a live HSV-2 ICP0 ^- mutant vaccine strain that is profoundly attenuated in vivo due to its interferon-hypersensitivity. Recipients of the HSV-2 0ΔNLS vaccine are resistant to high-dose HSV-2 challenge as evidenced by profound reductions in challenge virus spread, shedding, disease and mortality. In the current study, we investigated the requirements for HSV-2 0ΔNLS vaccine-induced protection. Studies using (UV)-inactivated HSV-2 0ΔNLS revealed that self-limited replication of the attenuated virus was required for effective protection from vaginal or ocular HSV-2 challenge. Diminished antibody responses in recipients of the UV-killed HSV-2 vaccine suggested that antibodies might be playing a critical role in early protection. This hypothesis was investigated in B-cell-deficient μMT mice. Vaccination with live HSV-2 0ΔNLS induced equivalent CD8⁺ T cell responses in wild-type and μMT mice. Vaccinated μMT mice shed ~40-fold more infectious HSV-2 at 24 hours post-challenge relative to vaccinated wild-type (B-cell⁺) mice, and most vaccinated μMT mice eventually succumbed to a slowly progressing HSV-2 challenge. Importantly, passive transfer of HSV-2 antiserum restored full protection to HSV-2 0ΔNLS-vaccinated μMT mice. The results demonstrate that B cells are required for complete vaccine-induced protection against HSV-2, and indicate that virus-specific antibodies are the dominant mediators of early vaccine-induced protection against HSV-2.     

Bimolecular Complementation Defines Functional Regions of Herpes Simplex Virus gB That Are Involved with gH/gL as a Necessary Step Leading to Cell Fusion

Herpes simplex virus (HSV) entry into cells requires four membrane glycoproteins: gD is the receptor binding protein, and gB and gH/gL constitute the core fusion machinery. Crystal structures of gD and its receptors have provided a basis for understanding the initial triggering steps, but how the core fusion proteins function remains unknown. The gB crystal structure shows that it is a class III fusion protein, yet unlike other class members, gB itself does not cause fusion. Bimolecular complementation (BiMC) studies have shown that gD-receptor binding triggers an interaction between gB and gH/gL and concurrently triggers fusion. Left unanswered was whether BiMC led to fusion or was a by-product of it. We used gB monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to block different aspects of these events. Non-virus-neutralizing MAbs to gB failed to block BiMC or fusion. In contrast, gB MAbs that neutralize virus blocked fusion. These MAbs map to three functional regions (FR) of gB. MAbs to FR1, which contains the fusion loops, and FR2 blocked both BiMC and fusion. In contrast, MAbs to FR3, a region involved in receptor binding, blocked fusion but not BiMC. Thus, FR3 MAbs separate the BiMC interaction from fusion, suggesting that BiMC occurs prior to fusion. When substituted for wild-type (wt) gB, fusion loop mutants blocked fusion and BiMC, suggesting that loop insertion precedes BiMC. Thus, we postulate that each of the gB FRs are involved in different aspects of the path leading to fusion. Upon triggering by gD, gB fusion loops are inserted into target lipid membranes. gB then interacts with gH/gL, and this interaction is eventually followed by fusion.Entry of herpes simplex virus (HSV) into cells requires four viral glycoproteins, gB, gD, gH, and gL, plus one of several cell receptors, either herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM), nectin-1, or 3-OST (45). Crystal structures and other studies have documented that receptor binding triggers conformational changes to gD that trigger the downstream events leading to fusion (10, 11, 18, 26, 28, 52). Moreover, when HSV receptor-bearing cells are transfected with expression plasmids for glycoproteins gB, gD, gH, and gL, the cells fuse to form multinucleated giant cells or syncytia (39, 48). However, the precise series of events that take place after receptor binding have not yet been fully elucidated. What we do know is that both gB and a heterodimer of gH/gL constitute the core fusion machinery that is conserved and required for the fusion step of entry of all herpesviruses (18, 26, 30, 46, 49).Thus far, we know the crystal structure of one form of the gB ectodomain of HSV type 1 (HSV-1) (19). This protein has the characteristics of a fusion protein and is a charter member of the class III group of viral fusion proteins (4). Others in this class include Epstein-Barr virus gB, vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) G, and baculovirus gp64 (5, 22, 41). Like VSV G and gp64, gB has two putative fusion loops at the base of each protomer of the crystallized trimer. Single-amino-acid mutations in many of the hydrophobic residues of the putative fusion loops of gB ablate its ability to function in cell-cell fusion assays (16, 17). Moreover, these mutants are unable to complement the entry of a gB-null virus (16). Finally, the ectodomains of these mutants, unlike wild-type protein, failed to coassociate with liposomes, indicating that the putative fusion loops do insert into membranes (16, 17). Recently, it was shown that several of these mutants are also defective for fusion events involved in virus egress (51). Together, these studies provide compelling evidence that HSV gB functions as a fusion protein and that the fusion loops are critical for this function. However, unlike VSV G and baculovirus gp64, gB does not function on its own in entry but, rather, requires the participation of gH/gL. In the absence of crystallographic data for gH/gL, it is not yet clear what role it plays in herpesvirus fusion. In a previous study, we used bimolecular complementation (BiMC) to examine protein-protein interactions that occur among the viral glycoproteins during fusion (1). A similar study was carried out by Avitabile et al. (2). The BiMC assay is based on the observation that N- and C-terminal fragments of green fluorescent protein (GFP) (and derivatives such as enhanced yellow fluorescent protein [EYFP]) do not spontaneously reconstitute a functional fluorophore (20, 29, 40). However, the codons for each half can be appended to the genes for two interacting proteins (23, 24). When these are cotransfected, an interaction between the two proteins of interest brings the two halves of the fluorophore in close enough contact to restore fluorescence.When HSV receptor-bearing cells, such as B78H1 cells that are engineered to express nectin-1, are transfected with plasmids that express gB, gD, gH, and gL, they undergo cell-cell fusion (13, 15, 27, 31, 48). When gD is omitted, no fusion occurs. We found that fusion of these transfected cells could be triggered by addition of a soluble form of gD (the gD ectodomain). We then used this approach to examine interactions between gB and gH/gL during cell fusion (1). Therefore, we tagged gB with the C-terminal half of EYFP and gH with the N-terminal half. When plasmids bearing these forms were cotransfected into C10 cells along with a plasmid for untagged gL, no fusion occurred, but importantly, no BiMC occurred. However, when we added gD306, cells began to fuse within 10 min, and all of the syncytia that formed exhibited bright EYFP fluorescence indicative of BiMC. We concluded that gD triggers both fusion and a physical interaction between gB and gH/gL. However, these experiments did not separate these two events, so we were unable to determine if the interaction preceded fusion or merely was a by-product of it.The purpose of this study was to determine if the gB-gH/gL interaction is essential for fusion and if it occurs prior to fusion. We focused on gB because its structure is known and we have a panel of well-characterized monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to gB. Our approach was to determine which of these MAbs, if any, could block fusion and also block the interaction with gH/gL. We also examined the effect of mutations to the fusion loops of gB on its interaction with gH/gL. We previously mapped these MAbs to four functional regions (FR) of gB, three of which were resolved in the crystal structure (6, 19). Of these, FR1 contains the fusion loops, FR2 is in the center of the gB structure with no known function, and FR3 is at in the crown of the protein and may be involved in binding to cells (7). Our rationale was that if the interaction between gB and gH/gL is important for fusion, then it should not be blocked by nonneutralizing anti-gB MAbs. At the same time, we thought that some neutralizing MAbs might not only block fusion but also block BiMC. We found that neutralizing MAbs to FR1 and FR2 inhibited both BiMC and fusion. In contrast, we found that neutralizing MAbs that map to FR3 blocked fusion but failed to block the interaction between gB and gH/gL, thereby dissociating the two events. Finally, we found that gB mutants with changes in the fusion loops that were fusion negative were also unable to bind to gH/gL. The latter results suggest that insertion of gB into the target membrane precedes its interaction with gH/gL.     

Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Glycoprotein M and the Membrane-Associated Protein UL11 Are Required for Virus-Induced Cell Fusion and Efficient Virus Entry

Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1) facilitates virus entry into cells and cell-to-cell spread by mediating fusion of the viral envelope with cellular membranes and fusion of adjacent cellular membranes. Although virus strains isolated from herpetic lesions cause limited cell fusion in cell culture, clinical herpetic lesions typically contain large syncytia, underscoring the importance of cell-to-cell fusion in virus spread in infected tissues. Certain mutations in glycoprotein B (gB), gK, UL20, and other viral genes drastically enhance virus-induced cell fusion in vitro and in vivo. Recent work has suggested that gB is the sole fusogenic glycoprotein, regulated by interactions with the viral glycoproteins gD, gH/gL, and gK, membrane protein UL20, and cellular receptors. Recombinant viruses were constructed to abolish either gM or UL11 expression in the presence of strong syncytial mutations in either gB or gK. Virus-induced cell fusion caused by deletion of the carboxyl-terminal 28 amino acids of gB or the dominant syncytial mutation in gK (Ala to Val at amino acid 40) was drastically reduced in the absence of gM. Similarly, syncytial mutations in either gB or gK did not cause cell fusion in the absence of UL11. Neither the gM nor UL11 gene deletion substantially affected gB, gC, gD, gE, and gH glycoprotein synthesis and expression on infected cell surfaces. Two-way immunoprecipitation experiments revealed that the membrane protein UL20, which is found as a protein complex with gK, interacted with gM while gM did not interact with other viral glycoproteins. Viruses produced in the absence of gM or UL11 entered into cells more slowly than their parental wild-type virus strain. Collectively, these results indicate that gM and UL11 are required for efficient membrane fusion events during virus entry and virus spread.     

The Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infected Cell Protein 22

As one of the immediate-early(IE)proteins of herpes simplex virus type 1(HSV-1),ICP22 is a multifunctional viral regulator that localizes in the nucleus of infected cells.It is required in experimental animal systems and some nonhuman cell lines,but not in Vero or HEp-2 cells.ICP22 is extensively phosphorylated by viral and cellular kinases and nucleotidylylated by casein kinase Ⅱ.It has been shown to be required for efficient expression of early(E)genes and a subset of late(L)genes.ICP22,in conjunction wit...     

Evidence for Translational Regulation by the Herpes Simplex Virus Virion Host Shutoff Protein

The herpes simplex virus (HSV) virion host shutoff protein (vhs) encoded by gene UL41 is an mRNA-specific RNase that triggers accelerated degradation of host and viral mRNAs in infected cells. We report here that vhs is also able to modulate reporter gene expression without greatly altering the levels of the target mRNA in transient-transfection assays conducted in HeLa cells. We monitored the effects of vhs on a panel of bicistronic reporter constructs bearing a variety of internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) located between two test cistrons. As expected, vhs inhibited the expression of the 5′ cistrons of all of these constructs; however, the response of the 3′ cistron varied with the IRES: expression driven from the wild-type EMCV IRES was strongly suppressed, while expression controlled by a mutant EMCV IRES and the cellular ApaF1, BiP, and DAP5 IRES elements was strongly activated. In addition, several HSV type 1 (HSV-1) 5′ untranslated region (5′ UTR) sequences also served as positive vhs response elements in this assay. IRES activation was also observed in 293 and HepG2 cells, but no such response was observed in Vero cells. Mutational analysis has yet to uncouple the ability of vhs to activate 3′ cistron expression from its shutoff activity. Remarkably, repression of 5′ cistron expression could be observed under conditions where the levels of the reporter RNA were not correspondingly reduced. These data provide strong evidence that vhs can modulate gene expression at the level of translation and that it is able to activate cap-independent translation through specific cis-acting elements.The virion host shutoff protein (vhs) encoded by herpes simplex virus (HSV) gene UL41 is an endoribonuclease that is packaged into the tegument of mature HSV virions. Once delivered into the cytoplasm of newly infected cells, vhs triggers shutoff of host protein synthesis, disruption of preexisting polysomes, and degradation of host mRNAs (reviewed in reference 62). The vhs-dependent shutoff system destabilizes many cellular and viral mRNAs (36, 46, 67). The rapid decline in host mRNA levels presumably helps viral mRNAs gain access to the cellular translational apparatus. In addition, the relatively short half-lives of viral mRNAs contribute to the sharp transitions between the successive phases of viral protein synthesis by tightly coupling changes in the rates of synthesis of viral mRNAs to altered mRNA levels (46). These effects enhance virus replication and may account for the modest reduction in virus yield displayed by vhs mutants in cultured Vero cells (55, 61).vhs also plays a critical role in HSV pathogenesis: vhs mutants are severely impaired for replication in the corneas and central nervous systems of mice and cannot efficiently establish or reactivate from latency (63, 65, 66). Mounting evidence indicates that this attenuation stems at least in part from an impaired ability to disarm elements of the innate and adaptive host immune responses (reviewed in reference 62). For example, vhs suppresses certain innate cellular antiviral responses, including production of proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (68); dampens the type I interferon system (11, 45, 49, 78); and blocks activation of dendritic cells (58). Moreover, vhs mutants display enhanced virulence in knockout mice lacking type I interferon (IFN) receptors (37, 45) or Stat1 (48) and are hypersensitive to the antiviral effects of IFN in some cells in tissue culture (11, 49, 68). Thus, vhs is arguably a bona fide virulence factor.vhs present in extracts of HSV virions or purified from bacteria has nonspecific RNase activity capable of degrading all RNA substrates (15, 70, 71, 79). However, vhs is highly selective in vivo, targeting mRNAs and sparing other cytoplasmic RNAs (36, 46). In vivo and in mammalian whole-cell extracts, vhs-induced decay of at least some mRNAs initiates near regions of translation initiation and proceeds in an overall 5′-to-3′ direction (12, 13, 29, 52). Moreover, vhs binds to the translation initiation factors eIF4H, eIF4B, and eIF4A II, all components of the cap recognition factor eIF4F (10, 16, 17). Thus, it has been proposed that vhs selectively targets actively translated mRNAs through interactions with eIF4F components (17). Consistent with this hypothesis, recent data document that eIF4H is required for vhs activity in vivo (59).A previous report from this laboratory documented that the internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) of the picornaviruses poliovirus and encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) strongly target vhs-induced RNA cleavage events to sequences immediately 3′ to the IRES in an in vitro translation system derived from rabbit reticulocyte lysates (RRL) (13). IRES elements are highly structured RNA sequences that are able to direct cap-independent translational initiation (reviewed in references 21, 25, 30, and 64). In the case of the poliovirus and EMCV elements, this is achieved by directly recruiting the eIF4F scaffolding protein eIF4G, thus bypassing the requirement for the cap-binding eIF4F subunit, eIF4E (reviewed in reference 30). Based on these data, we suggested that vhs is strongly targeted to the picornavirus IRES elements via interactions with eIF4 factors.A growing number of cellular mRNAs have been proposed to bear IRES elements in their 5′ untranslated regions (5′ UTRs). These include many that are involved in cellular stress responses, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression (24, 64, 74). Given the striking ability of picornavirus IRES elements to target vhs RNase activity in vitro, we asked whether viral and cellular IRES elements are able to modify the susceptibility of mRNAs to vhs in vivo. During the course of preliminary experiments designed to test this hypothesis, we unexpectedly discovered that vhs is able to strongly activate gene expression controlled by some cellular IRES elements and HSV 5′ UTR sequences in in vivo bicistronic reporter assays. These observations are the subject of the present report.     

A Network of Protein Interactions around the Herpes Simplex Virus Tegument Protein VP22

Assembly of the herpesvirus tegument is poorly understood but is believed to involve interactions between outer tegument proteins and the cytoplasmic domains of envelope glycoproteins. Here, we present the detailed characterization of a multicomponent glycoprotein-tegument complex found in herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1)-infected cells. We demonstrate that the tegument protein VP22 bridges a complex between glycoprotein E (gE) and glycoprotein M (gM). Glycoprotein I (gI), the known binding partner of gE, is also recruited into this gE-VP22-gM complex but is not required for its formation. Exclusion of the glycoproteins gB and gD and VP22''s major binding partner VP16 demonstrates that recruitment of virion components into this complex is highly selective. The immediate-early protein ICP0, which requires VP22 for packaging into the virion, is also assembled into this gE-VP22-gM-gI complex in a VP22-dependent fashion. Although subcomplexes containing VP22 and ICP0 can be formed when either gE or gM are absent, optimal complex formation requires both glycoproteins. Furthermore, and in line with complex formation, neither of these glycoproteins is individually required for VP22 or ICP0 packaging into the virion, but deletion of gE and gM greatly reduces assembly of both VP22 and ICP0. Double deletion of gE and gM also results in small plaque size, reduced virus yield, and defective secondary envelopment, similar to the phenotype previously shown for pseudorabies virus. Hence, we suggest that optimal gE-VP22-gM-gI-ICP0 complex formation correlates with efficient virus morphogenesis and spread. These data give novel insights into the poorly understood process of tegument acquisition.     

Reevaluating Herpes Simplex Virus Hemifusion

Membrane fusion induced by enveloped viruses proceeds through the actions of viral fusion proteins. Once activated, viral fusion proteins undergo large protein conformational changes to execute membrane fusion. Fusion is thought to proceed through a “hemifusion” intermediate in which the outer membrane leaflets of target and viral membranes mix (lipid mixing) prior to fusion pore formation, enlargement, and completion of fusion. Herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) requires four glycoproteins—glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein B (gB), and a heterodimer of glycoprotein H and L (gH/gL)—to accomplish fusion. gD is primarily thought of as a receptor-binding protein and gB as a fusion protein. The role of gH/gL in fusion has remained enigmatic. Despite experimental evidence that gH/gL may be a fusion protein capable of inducing hemifusion in the absence of gB, the recently solved crystal structure of HSV-2 gH/gL has no structural homology to any known viral fusion protein. We found that in our hands, all HSV entry proteins—gD, gB, and gH/gL—were required to observe lipid mixing in both cell-cell- and virus-cell-based hemifusion assays. To verify that our hemifusion assay was capable of detecting hemifusion, we used glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked hemagglutinin (HA), a variant of the influenza virus fusion protein, HA, known to stall the fusion process before productive fusion pores are formed. Additionally, we found that a mutant carrying an insertion within the short gH cytoplasmic tail, 824L gH, is incapable of executing hemifusion despite normal cell surface expression. Collectively, our findings suggest that HSV gH/gL may not function as a fusion protein and that all HSV entry glycoproteins are required for both hemifusion and fusion. The previously described gH 824L mutation blocks gH/gL function prior to HSV-induced lipid mixing.Membrane fusion is an essential step during the entry process of enveloped viruses, such as herpes simplex virus (HSV), into target cells. The general pathway by which enveloped viruses fuse with target membranes through the action of fusion proteins is fairly well understood. Viral fusion proteins use the free energy liberated during their own protein conformational changes to draw the two membranes—viral and target—together. Fusion is thought to proceed through a “hemifusion” intermediate, in which the proximal leaflets of the two bilayers have merged but a viral pore has not yet formed and viral contents have not yet mixed with the cell cytoplasm (10, 38). Fusion proteins then drive the completion of fusion, which includes fusion pore formation, pore enlargement, and complete content mixing.HSV, an enveloped neurotropic virus, requires four glycoproteins—glycoprotein B (gB), glycoprotein D (gD), glycoprotein H (gH), and glycoprotein L (gL)—to execute fusion (9, 57, 60). gB, gD, and gH are membrane bound; gL is a soluble protein which complexes with gH to form a heterodimer (gH/gL). HSV-1 gH is not trafficked to the cell or virion surface in the absence of gL (32, 52). The requirement of four entry glycoproteins sets HSV apart from other enveloped viruses, most of which induce fusion through the activity of a single fusion protein. Although the specific mode of HSV entry is cell type dependent—fusion with neurons and Vero cells occurs at the plasma membrane at neutral pH; fusion with HeLa and CHO cells involves pH-dependent endocytosis, and fusion with C10 cells involves pH-independent endocytosis (42, 45)—all routes of entry require gD, gB, and gH/gL. Furthermore, although some discrepancies between virus-cell and cell-cell fusion have been observed (8, 44, 55, 58), both generally require the actions of gD, gB, and gH/gL.Much work has gone toward the understanding of how the required HSV entry glycoproteins work together to accomplish fusion, and many questions remain. After viral attachment, mediated by glycoprotein C and/or gB (54), the first step in HSV fusion is thought to be gD binding a host cell receptor (either herpesvirus entry mediator [HVEM], nectin-1, nectin-2, or heparan sulfate modified by specific 3-O-sulfotransferases) (56). The gD-receptor interaction induces a conformational change in gD (39) that is thought to trigger gD-gB and/or gD-gH/gL interactions that are required for the progression of fusion (1-4, 13, 18, 23, 49).gB and gH/gL are considered the core fusion machinery of most herpesviruses. The HSV-1 gB structure revealed surprising structural homology to the postfusion structures of two known viral fusion proteins (31, 35, 51). This structural homology indicates that despite not being sufficient for HSV fusion, gB is likely a fusion protein. Although the gB cytoplasmic tail (CT) is not included in the solved structure, it acts as a regulator of fusion, as CT truncations can cause either hyperfusion or fusion-null phenotypes (5, 17). The gB CT has been proposed to bind stably to lipid membranes and negatively regulate membrane fusion (12). Another proposed regulator of gB function is gH/gL. Despite conflicting accounts of whether gD and a gD receptor are required for the interaction of gH/gL and gB (1, 3, 4), a recent study indicates that gH/gL and gB interact prior to fusion and that gB may interact with target membranes prior to an interaction with gH/gL (2). The gB-gH/gL interaction seems to be required for the progression of fusion.Compared to the other required HSV entry glycoproteins, the role of gH/gL during fusion remains enigmatic. Mutational studies have revealed several regions of the gH ectodomain, transmembrane domain (TM), and CT that are required for its function (19, 25, 26, 30, 33). gH/gL of another herpesvirus, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), have been shown to bind integrins during epithelial cell fusion, and soluble forms of HSV gH/gL have been shown to bind cells and inhibit viral entry in vitro (24, 46). However, the role of gH/gL binding to target cells in regard to the fusion process remains to be determined.There are some lines of evidence that suggest that gH/gL is a fusion protein. The gH/gL complexes of VZV and CMV have been reported to independently execute some level of cell-cell fusion (14, 37). HSV-1 gH/gL has been reported to independently mediate membrane fusion during nuclear egress (15). In silico analyses and studies of synthetic HSV gH peptides have proposed that gH has fusogenic properties (20, 21, 25-28). Finally, of most importance to the work we report here, gH/gL has been shown to be sufficient for induction of hemifusion in the presence of gD and a gD receptor, further promoting the premise that gH/gL is a fusion protein (59). However, the recently solved crystal structure of HSV-2 gH/gL revealed a tight complex of gH/gL in a “boot-like” structure, which bears no structural homology to any known fusion proteins (11). The HSV-2 gH/gL structure and research demonstrating that gH/gL and gB interactions are critical to fusion (2) have together prompted a new model of HSV fusion in which gH/gL is required to either negatively or positively regulate the activity of gB through direct binding.We wanted to investigate the ability of a previously reported gH CT mutant, 824L, to execute hemifusion. 824L gH contains a five-residue insertion at gH residue 824, just C-terminal of the TM domain. 824L is expressed on cell surfaces and incorporated into virions at levels indistinguishable from those of wild-type gH by either cell-based ELISA or immunoblotting, yet it is nonfunctional (33). We relied on a fusion assay capable of detecting hemifusion, developed by Subramanian et al. (59), which we modified to include an additional control for hemifusion or nonenlarging pore formation, glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-linked hemagglutinin (GPI-HA). GPI-HA is a variant of the influenza virus fusion protein, HA, that is known to stall the fusion process before enlarging fusion pores are formed.We were surprised to find that in our hands, gD, a gD receptor, and gH/gL were insufficient for the induction of hemifusion or lipid mixing in both cell-based and virus-based fusion assays. We found that gD, gB, and gH/gL are all required to observe lipid mixing. Further, we found that gB, gD, gL, and 824L gH are insufficient for lipid mixing. Our findings support the emerging view, based on gH/gL structure, that the gH/gL complex does not function as a fusion protein and does not insert into target membranes to initiate the process of fusion through a hemifusion intermediate. Our findings also further demonstrate that mutations in the CT of gH can have a dramatic effect on the ability of gH/gL to function in fusion.     

Identification of Phosphorylation Sites within the Herpes Simplex Virus Tegument Protein VP22

The herpes simplex virus protein VP22 is a major phosphoprotein of infected cells. In this study, we identify two serine phosphorylation sites within VP22 and show that the N-terminal site is a substrate for casein kinase II, while the extreme C-terminal site is a substrate for another, as yet unidentified, cellular kinase. Furthermore, we show that a mutant of VP22 which has both sites altered is unable to incorporate phosphate in vivo, confirming that there are no other phosphorylation sites within VP22.     

The Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 UL17 Gene Encodes Virion Tegument Proteins That Are Required for Cleavage and Packaging of Viral DNA

Previous studies have suggested that the U_L17 gene of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) is essential for virus replication. In this study, viral mutants incorporating either a lacZ expression cassette in place of 1,490 bp of the 2,109-bp U_L17 open reading frame [HSV-1(ΔU_L17)] or a DNA oligomer containing an in-frame stop codon inserted 778 bp from the 5′ end of the U_L17 open reading frame [HSV-1(U_L17-stop)] were plaque purified on engineered cell lines containing the U_L17 gene. A virus derived from HSV-1(U_L17-stop) but containing a restored U_L17 gene was also constructed and was designated HSV-1(U_L17-restored). The latter virus formed plaques and cleaved genomic viral DNA in a manner indistinguishable from wild-type virus. Neither HSV-1(ΔU_L17) nor HSV-1(U_L17-stop) formed plaques or produced infectious progeny when propagated on noncomplementing Vero cells. Furthermore, genomic end-specific restriction fragments were not detected in DNA purified from noncomplementing cells infected with HSV-1(ΔU_L17) or HSV-1(U_L17-stop), whereas end-specific fragments were readily detected when the viruses were propagated on complementing cells. Electron micrographs of thin sections of cells infected with HSV-1(ΔU_L17) or HSV-1(U_L17-stop) illustrated that empty capsids accumulated in the nuclei of Vero cells, whereas DNA-containing capsids accumulated in the nuclei of complementing cells and enveloped virions were found in the cytoplasm and extracellular space. Additionally, protein profiles of capsids purified from cells infected with HSV-1(ΔU_L17) compared to wild-type virus show no detectable differences. These data indicate that the U_L17 gene is essential for virus replication and is required for cleavage and packaging of viral DNA. To characterize the U_L17 gene product, an anti-U_L17 rabbit polyclonal antiserum was produced. The antiserum reacted strongly with a major protein of apparent M_r 77,000 and weakly with a protein of apparent M_r 72,000 in wild-type infected cell lysates and in virions. Bands of similar sizes were also detected in electrophoretically separated tegument fractions of virions and light particles and yielded tryptic peptides of masses characteristic of the predicted U_L17 protein. We therefore conclude that the U_L17 gene products are associated with the virion tegument and note that they are the first tegument-associated proteins shown to be required for cleavage and packaging of viral DNA.     

Incorporation of the Green Fluorescent Protein into the Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Capsid

The herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) UL35 open reading frame (ORF) encodes a 12-kDa capsid protein designated VP26. VP26 is located on the outer surface of the capsid specifically on the tips of the hexons that constitute the capsid shell. The bioluminescent jellyfish (Aequorea victoria) green fluorescent protein (GFP) was fused in frame with the UL35 ORF to generate a VP26-GFP fusion protein. This fusion protein was fluorescent and localized to distinct regions within the nuclei of transfected cells following infection with wild-type virus. The VP26-GFP marker was introduced into the HSV-1 (KOS) genome resulting in recombinant plaques that were fluorescent. A virus, designated K26GFP, was isolated and purified and was shown to grow as well as the wild-type virus in cell culture. An analysis of the intranuclear capsids formed in K26GFP-infected cells revealed that the fusion protein was incorporated into A, B, and C capsids. Furthermore, the fusion protein incorporated into the virion particle was fluorescent as judged by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis of infected cells in the absence of de novo protein synthesis. Cells infected with K26GFP exhibited a punctate nuclear fluorescence at early times in the replication cycle. At later times during infection a generalized cytoplasmic and nuclear fluorescence, including fluorescence at the cell membranes, was observed, confirming visually that the fusion protein was incorporated into intranuclear capsids and mature virions.     

Herpes Simplex Virus 2 UL45 Is a Type II Membrane Protein

In addition to eleven glycoproteins, the herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) genome encodes several proteins with potential membrane-spanning segments but no asparagine-linked carbohydrates. One of these is UL45. Fractionation of infected cells showed that HSV-2 UL45 is an integral membrane protein, and analysis of UL45 mutants with potential glycosylation sites showed that it has a type II membrane orientation, the first HSV protein known to have this orientation. Furthermore, it is detectable in infected cells at a time similar to that when glycoproteins gB and gD are detected, consistent with a role in cell-cell fusion, which has previously been found for HSV-1 UL45.     

Intracellular Trafficking of the UL11 Tegument Protein of Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1

Growing evidence indicates that herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) acquires its final envelope in the trans-Golgi network (TGN). During the envelopment process, the viral nucleocapsid as well as the envelope and tegument proteins must arrive at this site in order to be incorporated into assembling virions. To gain a better understanding of how these proteins associate with cellular membranes and target to the correct compartment, we have been studying the intracellular trafficking properties of the small tegument protein encoded by the U(L)11 gene of HSV-1. This 96-amino-acid, myristylated protein accumulates on the cytoplasmic face of internal membranes, where it is thought to play a role in nucleocapsid envelopment and egress. When expressed in the absence of other HSV-1 proteins, the UL11 protein localizes to the Golgi apparatus, and previous deletion analyses have revealed that the membrane-trafficking information is contained within the first 49 amino acids. The goal of this study was to map the functional domains required for proper Golgi membrane localization. In addition to N-terminal myristylation, which allows for weak membrane binding, UL11 appears to be palmitylated on one or more of three consecutive N-terminal cysteines. Using membrane-pelleting experiments and confocal microscopy, we show that palmitylation of UL11 is required for both Golgi targeting specificity and strong membrane binding. Furthermore, we found that a conserved acidic cluster within the first half of UL11 is required for the recycling of this tegument protein from the plasma membrane to the Golgi apparatus. Taken together, our results demonstrate that UL11 has highly dynamic membrane-trafficking properties, which suggests that it may play multiple roles on the plasma membrane as well as on the nuclear and TGN membranes.     

Stepwise Evolution of the Herpes Simplex Virus Origin Binding Protein and Origin of Replication

The herpes simplex virus replicon consists of cis-acting sequences, oriS and oriL, and the origin binding protein (OBP) encoded by the UL9 gene. Here we identify essential structural features in the initiator protein OBP and the replicator sequence oriS, and we relate the appearance of these motifs to the evolutionary history of the alphaherpesvirus replicon. Our results reveal two conserved sequence elements in herpes simplex virus type 1, OBP; the RVKNL motif, common to and specific for all alphaherpesviruses, is required for DNA binding, and the WP XXXGAXXFXX L motif, found in a subset of alphaherpesviruses, is required for specific binding to the single strand DNA-binding protein ICP8. A 121-amino acid minimal DNA binding domain containing conserved residues is not soluble and does not bind DNA. Additional sequences present 220 amino acids upstream from the RVKNL motif are needed for solubility and function. We also examine the binding sites for OBP in origins of DNA replication and how they are arranged. NMR and DNA melting experiments demonstrate that origin sequences derived from many, but not all, alphaherpesviruses can adopt stable boxI/boxIII hairpin conformations. Our results reveal a stepwise evolutionary history of the herpes simplex virus replicon and suggest that replicon divergence contributed to the formation of major branches of the herpesvirus family.Herpesviruses have been found in animal species ranging from molluscs to man. According to the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses, the order of Herpesvirales consists of three families as follows: Alloherpesviridae, Herpesviridae, and Malacoherpesviridae (1). The subfamilies Alphaherpesvirinae, Betaherpesvirinae, and Gammaherpesvirinae are found within the family of Herpesviridae. The events leading to establishment of a new virus species are poorly understood, but in the case of herpesviruses it is commonly assumed that viruses co-evolve with their hosts (2). Herpesviruses have thus become well adapted to their hosts and may reside in a latent state in the host for a lifetime with little or no overt signs of infection. Upon reactivation, the infectious virus will be released. The viruses remain faithful to their hosts, and infections across species borders are rare but may under specific circumstances give rise to fatal disease.Replication of herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1),² requires a cis-acting DNA sequence, the replicator, termed oriS or oriL, an initiator protein, OBP or UL9 protein, and a replisome composed of DNA polymerase, helicase-primase, and a single strand DNA-binding protein referred to as ICP8 or UL29 protein (3). OBP assisted by ICP8 can in an ATP-dependent reaction unwind double-stranded oriS (4, 5). The resulting single-stranded DNA adopts a hairpin conformation, which is stably bound by OBP (6, 7). The herpesvirus replisome once assembled on DNA is capable of synthesizing leading and lagging strands processively in a coordinated fashion (8). DNA replication is likely to start on circular molecules produced by the action of DNA ligase IV/XRCC4 and proceed in a θ-type manner (9, 10). Later, a rolling circle mode of replication dominates giving rise to characteristic head-to-tail concatemers. The initiator protein OBP appears to be strictly required only during the first few hours of the infectious cycle (11, 12).The HSV-1 origin binding protein was first isolated using an assay monitoring specific binding to HSV-1 oriS (13). A minimal DNA-binding site was identified using footprinting techniques as well as binding studies with double-stranded oligonucleotides (14). For alphaherpesviruses the high affinity binding site is always TTCGCAC, with a minor exception for CHV1 also referred to as monkey B virus (3 The C-terminal 317 amino acids of alphaherpesvirus OBP can be isolated as a soluble protein, which remains capable of high affinity binding to the sequence TTCGCAC (15). The C-terminal domain of HSV-1 OBP, here referred to as ΔOBP, binds as a monomer to the major groove in the DNA and makes contacts with base pairs as well as the deoxyribose-phosphate backbone (16, 17). ΔOBP binds DNA specifically with an estimated K_d of 0.3 nm, a value that is highly influenced by the composition of the assay buffer (16). At high protein concentrations ΔOBP form aggregates, which, still in a sequence-specific manner, binds DNA (16). A number of studies have attempted to define amino acids involved in DNA binding (18–21). In addition, sequence comparisons between alphaherpesviruses and roseoloviruses have helped to identify amino acids in OBP potentially involved in DNA binding as well as corresponding recognition sequences in origins of DNA replication (22–25). However, a comprehensive and quantitative study of evolutionarily conserved amino acids required for DNA binding is still lacking.

TABLE 1

Functionally significant sequence motifs for herpes simplex virus replicon evolutionOrigins of DNA replication have been identified from sequence analysis. For roseoloviruses the sequences for two slightly different binding sites for OBP have been listed (31). The number and orientation of OBP-binding sites in relation to an AT-rich spacer sequence are schematically presented by symbols > and <. Note that since a virus often has more than one origin of replication they may exist as variants. This is indicated by symbols within parentheses. The conserved amino acids within the ICP8-binding motif are shown in boldface type. Sources and nomenclature for DNA sequences have been presented in Footnote 3.Open in a separate windowThe single strand DNA-binding protein, ICP8 encoded by the UL29 gene, is involved in initiation of DNA replication, and it also participates in the elongation phase at the replication fork (4, 5, 26). ICP8 forms a specific complex with OBP (26, 27). Studies with deletion mutants have demonstrated that important sequences are found close to the C terminus of OBP, but amino acids directly participating in the high affinity interaction have not been identified. The interaction is biologically significant, because deletion of the extreme C terminus enhances the helicase activity of OBP but reduces origin-dependent DNA synthesis (26).The HSV-1 oriS contains three copies of the binding site for OBP; two binding sites, box I and box II, are high affinity sites, and the third binding site, box III, has a very low affinity for OBP (14) (Fig. 1). All sites are required for efficient replication, and in a competitive situation there is a strong selection for the most efficient replicator sequence (28). Box III and box I are arranged in a palindrome, which becomes rearranged upon activation to form an alternative conformation, most likely a hairpin (4, 6, 7). Point mutations that prevent formation of a hairpin reduce replication, and compensatory mutations restore complementary base pairing as well as the ability to replicate (7).Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.Schematic presentation of the herpes simplex virus replicon. Upper part, HSV-1 oriS. The linear genome contains three homologous replication origins, two copies of oriS and one copy oriL, and encodes seven replication proteins. Middle part, HSV-1 OBP. OBP or UL9 protein is a superfamily II DNA helicase as well as a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein. Here the helicase domain is represented by two connected ellipsoids, and the C-terminal DNA binding is drawn as a circle. The OBP-binding sites in oriS are shown. The OBP dimer binds two double-stranded DNA box I oligonucleotides but only one hairpin with a single-stranded tail (48). The figure is intended to demonstrate conformational changes affecting the DNA binding domain, referred to as ΔOBP, during activation of oriS. Lower part, DNA binding domain ΔOBP. A schematic presentation of the following three motifs discussed in this publication: the F553 XX KYL motif required for proper folding of the DNA binding domain, the R756VKNL motif necessary for DNA binding, and the W839PXXXGAXXFXXL motif involved in binding to ICP8.To learn more about the mechanism of virus evolution, we have examined the evolutionary history of some functionally significant features of the HSV-1 replicon and related them to a sequence-based evolutionary tree. The results indicate that replicon divergence, characterized by the stepwise appearance of the DNA-binding RVKNL motif, the WPXXXGAXXFXXL ICP8-binding motif, and the boxIII–boxI palindrome, may have played important roles in establishing major branches of the alphaherpesvirus tree.