Sequential expression and differential function of multiple enamel proteins during fetal, neonatal, and early postnatal stages of mouse molar organogenesis

We have established the time and position of expression for multiple enamel proteins during the development of the mouse molar tooth organ. Using high-resolution two-dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled with immunoblotting and immunocytochemistry, a 46-kDa enamel protein (pI, 5.5) was detected during late cap stage (18-days gestation, E18d) within differentiation-zone-II inner enamel epithelia associated with an intact basal lamina. At E19d a second enamel polypeptide of 72 kDa (pI, 5.8) was identified at the time and position of initial biomineralization in differentiation zone V. At 20 days, differentiation-zone-VI ameloblasts without basal lamina (late bell stage) expressed 46- and 72-kDa enamel proteins and, in addition, expressed a relatively more basic 26-kDa enamel protein (pI, 6.5-6.7); detected after initial formation of calcium hydroxyapatite crystals. Antibodies raised against chemically synthesized enamel peptides cross-reacted with both the 72-kDa and 26-kDa polypeptides, but did not cross-react with the 46-kDa enamel polypeptide. The sequential expression of multiple enamel proteins suggests several functions: (a) the anionic enamel proteins may provide an instructive template for calcium hydroxyapatite crystal formation; (b) the more neutral proteins possibly serve to regulate size, shape and rates of enamel crystal formation. We suggest that initial expression of enamel gene products during mouse tooth development possibly recapitulates ancestral features of amelogenesis documented in prereptilian vertebrates. These results imply that multiple instructive signals may be responsible for mammalian enamel protein induction and that the sequential expression of a family of enamel proteins reflects the evolutionary acquisition of a more complex genetic program for amelogenesis.     

Conservation and variation in enamel protein distribution during vertebrate tooth development

Vertebrate enamel formation is a unique synthesis of the function of highly specialized enamel proteins and their effect on the growth and organization of apatite crystals. Among tetrapods, the physical structure of enamel is highly conserved, while there is a greater variety of enameloid tooth coverings in fish. In the present study, we postulated that in enamel microstructures of similar organization, the principle components of the enamel protein matrix would have to be highly conserved. In order to identify the enamel proteins that might be most highly conserved and thus potentially most essential to the process of mammalian enamel formation, we used immunoscreening with enamel protein antibodies as a means to assay for degrees of homology to mammalian enamel proteins. Enamel preparations from mouse, gecko, frog, lungfish, and shark were screened with mammalian enamel protein antibodies, including amelogenin, enamelin, tuftelin, MMP20, and EMSP1. Our results demonstrated that amelogenin was the most highly conserved enamel protein associated with the enamel organ, enamelin featured a distinct presence in shark enameloid but was also present in the enamel organ of other species, while the other enamel proteins, tuftelin, MMP20, and EMSP1, were detected in both in the enamel organ and in other tissues of all species investigated. We thus conclude that the investigated enamel proteins, amelogenin, enamelin, tuftelin, MMP20, and EMSP1, were highly conserved in a variety of vertebrate species. We speculate that there might be a unique correlation between amelogenin-rich tetrapod and lungfish enamel with long and parallel crystals and enamelin-rich basal vertebrate enameloid with diverse patterns of crystal organization.     

Human and mouse cementum proteins immunologically related to enamel proteins

SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, immunoblot and amino acid composition analyses were applied to human and mouse acellular cementum proteins immunologically related to enamelins and amelogenins. In this analysis, anti-mouse amelogenin, anti-human enamelin and synthetic peptide (e.g., -LPPHPGHPGYIC-) antibodies were shown to cross-react with tooth crown-derived enamelin with a molecular mass of 72,000 Da (72 kDa), amelogenins (26 kDa), and also to four human cementum proteins (72, 58, 50 and 26 kDa) and two mouse cementum proteins (72 and 26 kDa). Each of the antibodies recognized tooth root-derived cementum polypeptides which share one or more epitopes with tooth crown-derived enamel proteins. The molecular mass and isoelectric points for crown-derived and root-derived enamel-related proteins were similar. Analysis of human and mouse cementum proteins revealed a characteristic amino acid composition enriched in glutamyl, serine, glycine, alanine, proline, valine and leucine residues; compared to the major enamel protein amelogenin, cementum proteins were low in proline, histidine and methionine. The human and mouse putative intermediate cementum proteins appear to represent a distinct class of enamel-related proteins. Moreover, these results support the hypothesis that epithelial root sheath epithelia express several cementum proteins immunologically related to canonical enamel proteins.     

Selachian tooth development: II. Immunolocalization of amelogenin polypeptides in epithelium during secretory amelogenesis in Squalus acanthias

We have determined the distribution of amelogenin polypeptides in an order of elasmobranchs using indirect immunofluorescence with rabbit polyclonal antibodies prepared to purified murine amelogenins. We find that amelogenins are definitely present within the inner enamel epithelium prior to the production of the extracellular matrix component termed "enameloid" (row II developing tooth organs). During subsequent stages of selachian tooth development (row III tooth organs), immunofluorescence staining data indicated localization of amelogenin antigens within epithelium as well as the enameloid extracellular matrix. The results from these immunohistochemical studies suggest that the 16-20 kdalton amelogenins, which are characteristic of murine inner enamel epithelial cells undergoing terminal biochemical differentiation into secretory ameloblasts, may also be regarded as molecular markers for amelogenesis in developing teeth in the spiny dogfish, Squalus acanthias.     

Identification and characterization of a squamate reptilian amelogenin gene: Iguana iguana

As the principal components of the developing tooth enamel matrix, amelogenins play a significant role in tooth enamel formation and organization. In order to elucidate the structure and function of amelogenins in the evolution of enamel, we have selected the Iguana iguana as a squamate model organism. Here we report the first complete squamate amelogenin sequence available as of yet and document unique features of Iguana amelogenins and enamel. Transmission electron microscopy documented randomly oriented Iguana enamel crystals during the elongation phase compared with organized enamel crystal patterns at comparable stages in mammals. Sequencing of PCR amplified products revealed a full-length I. iguana amelogenin cDNA containing 877 nucleotides with a 564 nucleotide coding sequence encoding 187 amino acids. The homologies of the newly discovered I. iguana amelogenin amino acid sequence with the published mouse, caiman (Palaeosuchus), and snake (Elaphe) amelogenin were 41.3%, 53.5%, and 55.5%, respectively. On Western blots one major protein with a molecular weight of 24 kDa, and two minor proteins with molecular weights of 28 and 13.5 kDa, respectively, were detected based on the cross-reactivity of antisera against recombinant Rana pipiens amelogenin proteins. Sequence analysis revealed a moderate sequence homology between mammalian and reptilian amelogenin genes. A significant alteration was the deletion of the hydrophilic GSP sequence from exon 3 in the mouse sequence resulting in a conversion to a hydrophobic region in Iguana. Together, these findings identified a novel amelogenin cDNA sequence in the squamate reptilian I. iguana and functional implications for the evolution of amelogenins and enamel in squamates.     

Fine structural and immunohistochemical detection of collar enamel in the teeth of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Polypterus senegalus</Emphasis>, an actinopterygian fish

This is the first detailed report about the collar enamel of the teeth of Polypterus senegalus. We have examined the fine structure of the collar enamel and enamel organ of Polypterus during amelogenesis by light and transmission electron microscopy. An immunohistochemical analysis with an antibody against bovine amelogenin, an antiserum against porcine amelogenin and region-specific antibodies or antiserum against the C-terminus, middle region and N-terminus of porcine amelogenin has also been performed to examine the collar enamel matrix present in these teeth. Their ameloblasts contain fully developed Golgi apparatus, rough endoplasmic reticulum and secretory granules. During collar enamel formation, an amorphous fine enamel matrix containing no collagen fibrils is found between the dentin and ameloblast layers. In non-demineralized sections, the collar enamel (500 nm to 1 μm thick) is distinguishable from dentin, because of its higher density and differences in the arrangement of its crystals. The fine structural features of collar enamel in Polypterus are similar to those of tooth enamel in Lepisosteus (gars), coelacanths, lungfish and amphibians. The enamel matrix shows intense immunoreactivity to the antibody and antiserum against mammalian amelogenins and to the middle-region- and C-terminal-specific anti-amelogenin antibodies. These findings suggest that the proteins in the enamel of Polypterus contain domains that closely resemble those of bovine and porcine amelogenins. The enamel matrix, which exhibits positive immunoreactivity to mammalian amelogenins, extends to the cap enameloid surface, implying that amelogenin-like proteins are secreted by ameloblasts as a thin matrix layer that covers the cap enameloid after enameloid maturation.     

Immunochemical and immunohistochemical studies, using antisera against porcine 25 kDa amelogenin, 89 kDa enamelin and the 13-17 kDa nonamelogenins, on immature enamel of the pig and rat

Enamel proteins were extracted from the newly formed layer of immature porcine enamel, and the 25 kDa amelogenin, 89 kDa enamelin and 13-17 kDa nonamelogenins were purified. Specific antisera were raised against these proteins. Antibodies specific to the C-terminal region (residues 149-173) of the 25 kDa amelogenin were generated by absorption of the anti-25 kDa amelogenin serum with 20 kDa amelogenin, which contains residues 1-148 of the antigen. Immunoelectro-transfer blotting of the extracted porcine enamel proteins showed that the anti-25 kDa amelogenin serum recognized the 25 kDa and other low and high molecular weight amelogenins. The C-terminal specific anti-25 kDa amelogenin serum reacted only with amelogenins having molecular weights over 23 kDa. The anti-89 kDa enamelin serum recognized the 89 kDa enamelin and lower molecular weight proteins, but neither the amelogenins nor the 13-17 kDa nonamelogenins. The antiserum against the 13-17 kDa nonamelogenins showed no cross reactivity to the 89 kDa enamelin, but recognized higher molecular weight nonamelogenins. In immunohistochemical preparations of the porcine tooth germs, the 25 kDa amelogenin-like immunoreactivity over immature enamel decreased in a gradient from the enamel surface to the middle layer. In the inner layer immunoreactivity was concentrated over the prism sheaths. The C-terminal specific 25 kDa amelogenin-like immunoreactivity was intense at the outer layer of immature enamel and decreased sharply toward the middle layer. Prism sheaths were intensely stained by the antiserum to the 13-17 kDa nonamelogenins.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Amelogenin sequence and enamel biomineralization in Rana pipiens

The amelogenin gene contributes the majority of tooth enamel proteins and plays a significant role in enamel biomineralization. While several mammalian and reptilian amelogenins have been cloned and sequenced, basal vertebrate amelogenin evolution remains to be understood. In order to start elucidating the structure and function of amelogenins in the evolution of enamel, the leopard frog (Rana pipiens) was used as a model. Tissues from Rana pipiens teeth were analyzed for enamel structure and RNA extracts were processed for sequence analysis. Electron microscopy revealed that Rana pipiens enamel contains long and parallel crystals similar to mammalian enamel, while immunoreactions confirmed the site-specific localization of cross-reactive amelogenins in Rana pipiens enamel. Sequencing of amelogenin PCR products revealed a 782bp cDNA with a 546-nucleotide coding sequence encoding 181 amino acids. The homology of the newly discovered Rana pipiens amelogenin nucleotide and amino acid sequence with the published mouse amelogenin was 38.6% and 45%, respectively. These findings report the first complete amelogenin cDNA sequence in amphibians and indicate a close homology between mammalian enamel formation and Rana pipiens enamel biomineralization.     

Immunochemical and immunohistochemical studies,using antisera against porcine 25 kDa amelogenin, 89 kDa enamelin and the 13–17 kDa nonamelogenins,on immature enamel of the pig and rat

Summary Enamel proteins were extracted from the newly formed layer of immature porcine enamel, and the 25 kDa amelogenin, 89 kDa enamelin and 13–17 kDa nonamelogenins were purified. Specific antisera were raised against these proteins. Antibodies specific to the C-terminal region (residues 149–173) of the 25 kDa amelogenin were generated by absorption of the anti-25 kDa amelogenin serum with 20 kDa amelogenin, which contains residues 1–148 of the antigen. Immunoelectrotransfer blotting of the extracted porcine enamel proteins showed that the anti-25 kDa amelogenin serum recognized the 25 kDa and other low and high molecular weight amelogenins. The C-terminal specific anti-25 kDa amelogenin serum reacted only with amelogenins having molecular weights over 23 kDa. The anti-89 kDa enamelin serum recognized the 89 kDa enamelin and lower molecular weight proteins, but neither the amelogenins nor the 13–17 kDa nonamelogenins. The antiserum against the 13–17 kDa nonamelogenins showed no cross reactivity to the 89 kDa enamelin, but recognized higher molecular weight nonamelogenins. In immunohistochemical preparations of the porcine tooth germs, the 25 kDa amelogenin-like immunoreactivity over immature enamel decreased in a gradient from the enamel surface to the middle layer. In the inner layer immunoreactivity was concentrated over the prism sheaths. The C-terminal specific 25 kDa amelogenin-like immunoreactivity was intense at the outer layer of immature enamel and decreased sharply toward the middle layer. Prism sheaths were intensely stained by the antiserum to the 13–17 kDa nonamelogenins. The 89 kDa enamelin-like immunoreactivity over enamel prisms was intense at the outer layer and decreased toward the middle layer. Staining by the anti-89 kDa enamelin serum of prism sheaths was faint. In immature rat incisor enamel, the C-terminal specific 25 kDa amelogenin antiserum demonstrated a staining pattern similar to that in the immature enamel of the pig. Distinct 13–17 kDa nonamelogenin-like and 89 kDa enamelin-like immunoreactivities were found especially in the layer adjacent to the Tomes' process. We conclude that some enamel proteins are degraded soon after their secretion from the secretory ameloblast in the rat and the pig. The specific enamel proteins which reacted with the antiserum to the 13–17 kDa nonamelogenins seem to be involved with the formation of prism sheaths in immature porcine enamel, but not in rat incisor enamel.     

Binding of amelogenin to MMP-9 and their co-expression in developing mouse teeth

Amelogenin is the most abundant matrix protein in enamel. Proper amelogenin processing by proteinases is necessary for its biological functions during amelogenesis. Matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9) is responsible for the turnover of matrix components. The relationship between MMP-9 and amelogenin during tooth development remains unknown. We tested the hypothesis that MMP-9 binds to amelogenin and they are co-expressed in ameloblasts during amelogenesis. We evaluated the distribution of both proteins in the mouse teeth using immunohistochemistry and confocal microscopy. At postnatal day 2, the spatial distribution of amelogenin and MMP-9 was co-localized in preameloblasts, secretory ameloblasts, enamel matrix and odontoblasts. At the late stages of mouse tooth development, expression patterns of amelogenin and MMP-9 were similar to that seen in postnatal day 2. Their co-expression was further confirmed by RT-PCR, Western blot and enzymatic zymography analyses in enamel organ epithelial and odontoblast-like cells. Immunoprecipitation assay revealed that MMP-9 binds to amelogenin. The MMP-9 cleavage sites in amelogenin proteins across species were found using bio-informative software program. Analyses of these data suggest that MMP-9 may be involved in controlling amelogenin processing and enamel formation.     

Amelogenesis in vitro: a model for studies of epithelial postsecretory processing during tissue-specific extracellular matrix biomineralization

The extracellular matrix (ECM) of developing mammalian enamel comprises a complex of unusual epithelial-derived proteins, which appear to function in concert to initiate and propagate tissue-specific biomineralization. Following enamel protein synthesis by ameloblast cells within the enamel organ, the subsequent steps of posttranslational modification, secretion, postsecretory processing and eventual removal of these proteins from forming enamel are largely unknown. To address this issue we have designed studies to investigate the hypothesis that enamel proteins are removed from enamel and translocated into the vasculature as relatively high-molecular-weight components. We examined enamel proteins recovered from serumless medium during prolonged organ culture of mouse capstage mandibular first molars. By 21 days in vitro the tooth crown formed and dentine and enamel biomineralization were apparent. At 31 days, explants retained metabolic activity and the enamel matrix showed extensive transformation. Immunologically identified enamel proteins of 26-18 k Da were produced by cultured tooth organs, translocated from tooth explants to the culture medium, recovered from the medium and then compared to control enamel protein from in vivo preparations. Comparable postsecretory processing of the 26-k Da amelogenin protein was observed in vitro and in vivo. We speculate that the pathway reported in the present studies is comparable to the processing of the enamel protein polypeptides of the maturing enamel which occurs in vivo. The in vitro organ culture model described in this report provides an approach with which to investigate the molecular events associated with epithelial-derived postsecretory processing of ECM molecules associated with tissue-specific biomineralization.     

Isolation of enamelinlike proteins from blue shark (Prionace glauca) enameloid

A sequential dissociative extraction scheme was used to extract proteins from developing Blue Shark enameloid. The first extraction solution (4 M guanidine HC1) solubilized the polypeptides, mainly collagenous, not closely associated with the hydroxyapatite. The next extraction solution (4 M guanidine HC1, 0.5 M ethylenediaminetetraacedic acid (EDTA] solubilized the proteins more closely associated with the tooth mineral component. After extraction, the proteins were separated and isolated with gel electrophoresis. Protein molecular weights were determined and selected proteins were isolated for amino acid composition analysis. The two proteins isolated were tested for mammalian enamel protein antigenic determinants by a "Dot" immunobinding assay. The isolated proteins were enamelinlike by extraction criteria and amino acid composition. Further, the two proteins share antigenic determinants with mammalian enamel proteins.     

Isolation and characterization of fatty acid binding protein in the liver of the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum.

1. A 14.5 kDa fatty acid binding protein was isolated from the liver of the nurse shark, Ginglymostoma cirratum. 2. Purified shark liver FABP (pI = 5.4) bound oleic acid at a single site with an affinity similar to that of mammalian FABP. 3. The apparent size, pI and amino acid composition of shark liver FABP indicate a close structural relationship between this protein and mammalian heart FABP.     

Spatiotemporal expression of ameloblastin isoforms during murine tooth development

Ameloblasts synthesize and secrete the enamel matrix proteins (amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin). This investigation examined the profiles of ameloblastin in the ameloblasts and in the enamel matrix during different postnatal (PN) days (days 0-9) of development of mouse molar, using an antibody specific for C-terminal sequence of ameloblastin (Ct; GNKVHQPQVHNAWRF). Ameloblastin is found in three different molecular sizes (37, 55, and 66 kDa) in both ameloblasts and enamel matrix during PN development. In the ameloblasts, the sequence of expression of these fractions varied. The 37-kDa fraction was observed (even before the appearances of mRNA of the proteases, enamelysin and kallikrein-4) on days 0 and 1, persisted until day 3, and was not found thereafter. Other isoforms (55 and 66 kDa) distinctly appeared in ameloblasts after day 1, reached a peak on day 5, and remained thereafter. The Ct-positive granules appeared beaded in the ameloblasts on day 3. In the extracellular matrix, a 37-kDa (but not 66- or 55-kDa) fraction was detected on days 0 and 1 and remained in the matrix throughout the PN days. The larger isoforms (55 and 66 kDa) appeared in the enamel matrix from day 3 onward. On days 0-3, but not later, the 37-kDa isoform co-localizes with amelogenin in Tomes' process and formative enamel, as revealed by laser scan confocal microscopy. Autoradiography confirmed accumulation of 3H-labeled amelogenin trityrosyl motif peptide in the region of Tomes' process and formative enamel from day 0 to 3. These observations suggest that the 37-kDa isoform interacts with amelogenin during early tooth development.     

Enamelysin (matrix metalloproteinase 20)-deficient mice display an amelogenesis imperfecta phenotype

Enamelysin is a tooth-specific matrix metalloproteinase that is expressed during the early through middle stages of enamel development. The enamel matrix proteins amelogenin, ameloblastin, and enamelin are also expressed during this same approximate developmental time period, suggesting that enamelysin may play a role in their hydrolysis. In support of this interpretation, recombinant enamelysin was previously demonstrated to cleave recombinant amelogenin at virtually all of the precise sites known to occur in vivo. Thus, enamelysin is likely an important amelogenin-processing enzyme. To characterize the in vivo biological role of enamelysin during tooth development, we generated an enamelysin-deficient mouse by gene targeting. Although mice heterozygous for the mutation have no apparent phenotype, the enamelysin null mouse has a severe and profound tooth phenotype. Specifically, the null mouse does not process amelogenin properly, possesses an altered enamel matrix and rod pattern, has hypoplastic enamel that delaminates from the dentin, and has a deteriorating enamel organ morphology as development progresses. Our findings demonstrate that enamelysin activity is essential for proper enamel development.     

Ameloblastic secretion and calcification of the enamel layer in shark teeth

Tooth primordia at early stages of mineralization in the sharks Negaprion brevirostris and Triaenodon obesus were examined electron microscopically for evidence of ameloblastic secretion and its relation to calcification of the enamel (enameloid) layer. Ameloblasts are polarized with most of the mitochondria and all of the Golgi dictyosomes localized in the infranuclear end of the cell toward the squamous outer cells of the enamel organ. Endoplasmic reticular membranes and ribosomes are also abundant in this region. Ameloblastic vesicles bud from the Golgi membranes and evidently move through perinuclear and supranuclear zones to accumulate at the apical end of the cell. The vesicles secrete their contents through the apical cell membrane in merocrine fashion and appear to contribute precursor material both for the basal lamina and the enameline matrix. The enamel layer consists of four zones: a juxta-laminar zone containing newly polymerized mineralizing fibrils (tubules); a pre-enamel zone of assembly of matrix constituents; palisadal zones of mineralizing fibrils (tubules); and interpalisadal zones containing granular amorphous matrix, fine unit fibrils, and giant cross-banded fibers with a periodicity of 17.9 nm. It seems probable that amorphous, non-mineralizing fibrillar and mineralizing fibrillar constituents of the matrix are all products of ameloblastic secretion. Odontoblastic processes are tightly embedded in the matrix of the palisadal zones and do not appear to be secretory at the stages investigated. The shark tooth enamel layer is considered homologous with that of other vertebrates with respect to origin of its mineralizing fibrils from the innerental epithelium. The term enameloid is appropriate to connote the histological distinction that the enamel layer contains odontoblastic processes but should not signify that shark tooth enamel is a modified type of dentine. How amelogenins and/or enamelins secreted by amelo- blasts in the shark and other vertebrates are related to nucleation and growth of enamel crystallites is still not known.     

The Evolution of Enamel Microstructure: How Important Is Amelogenin?

The shape, size, and orientation of enamel prisms have heretofore been thought to be controlled solely by the shape of the Tomes' process. It is known, however, that amelogenin proteins play an important role in enamel deposition and maturation and it is possible that they contribute independently to enamel structure. Using a phylogenetic framework, we clarify the role of amelogenin proteins in the formation of enamel microstructure. We found a negative association between evolutionary changes in amelogenin protein sequences and enamel complexity: amelogenin evolution slows as enamel complexity increases. This is probably because selective constraints on amelogenin increase as enamel complexity increases. Monotremes, which have lost their adult dentition, have particularly high rates of amelogenin evolution while rodents, which have very complex enamel, have very low rates. There is a positive correlation between the number of different amelogenin proteins in a given species and the complexity of its enamel microstructure. An increased number of amelogenins may be necessary for the formation of multiple enamel types in the same tooth. Alternative splicing of amelogenin exons, which allows multiple protein products to be produced from the same gene, may be a key innovation in the diversification of enamel microstructure.