Sar1p N-terminal helix initiates membrane curvature and completes the fission of a COPII vesicle

Secretory proteins traffic from the ER to the Golgi via COPII-coated transport vesicles. The five core COPII proteins (Sar1p, Sec23/24p, and Sec13/31p) act in concert to capture cargo proteins and sculpt the ER membrane into vesicles of defined geometry. The molecular details of how the coat proteins deform the lipid bilayer into vesicles are not known. Here we show that the small GTPase Sar1p directly initiates membrane curvature during vesicle biogenesis. Upon GTP binding by Sar1p, membrane insertion of the N-terminal amphipathic alpha helix deforms synthetic liposomes into narrow tubules. Replacement of bulky hydrophobic residues in the alpha helix with alanine yields Sar1p mutants that are unable to generate highly curved membranes and are defective in vesicle formation from native ER membranes despite normal recruitment of coat and cargo proteins. Thus, the initiation of vesicle budding by Sar1p couples the generation of membrane curvature with coat-protein assembly and cargo capture.     

Sar1 GTPase Activity Is Regulated by Membrane Curvature

The majority of biosynthetic secretory proteins initiate their journey through the endomembrane system from specific subdomains of the endoplasmic reticulum. At these locations, coated transport carriers are generated, with the Sar1 GTPase playing a critical role in membrane bending, recruitment of coat components, and nascent vesicle formation. How these events are appropriately coordinated remains poorly understood. Here, we demonstrate that Sar1 acts as the curvature-sensing component of the COPII coat complex and highlight the ability of Sar1 to bind more avidly to membranes of high curvature. Additionally, using an atomic force microscopy-based approach, we further show that the intrinsic GTPase activity of Sar1 is necessary for remodeling lipid bilayers. Consistent with this idea, Sar1-mediated membrane remodeling is dramatically accelerated in the presence of its guanine nucleotide-activating protein (GAP), Sec23-Sec24, and blocked upon addition of guanosine-5′-[(β,γ)-imido]triphosphate, a poorly hydrolysable analog of GTP. Our results also indicate that Sar1 GTPase activity is stimulated by membranes that exhibit elevated curvature, potentially enabling Sar1 membrane scission activity to be spatially restricted to highly bent membranes that are characteristic of a bud neck. Taken together, our data support a stepwise model in which the amino-terminal amphipathic helix of GTP-bound Sar1 stably penetrates the endoplasmic reticulum membrane, promoting local membrane deformation. As membrane bending increases, Sar1 membrane binding is elevated, ultimately culminating in GTP hydrolysis, which may destabilize the bilayer sufficiently to facilitate membrane fission.     

Mechanisms for the modulation of membrane bilayer properties by amphipathic helical peptides

The amphipathic helix, in which hydrophobia and hydrophilic residues are grouped on opposing faces, is a structural mot if found in many peptides and proteins that bind to membranes. One of the physical properties of membranes that can be altered by the binding of amphipathic helices is membrane monolayer curvature strain. Class A amphipathic helices, which are present in exchangeable plasma lipoproteins, can stabilize membranes by reducing negative monolayer curvature strain; proline-punctuated class A amphipathic helical segments are particularly effective in this regard. This property is suggested to be associated with some of the beneficial biological effects of this protein. On the other hand, lytic amphipathic helical peptides can act by increasing negative curvature strain or by forming pores composed of helical clusters. Thus, different amphipathic helical peptides can be membrane stabilizing or be lytic to membranes, depending on the structural motif of the helix, which in turn determines the nature of its association with membranes. Features of these peptides that are responsible for their specific properties are discussed. © 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Crystal structure of Sar1-GDP at 1.7 A resolution and the role of the NH2 terminus in ER export.

The Sar1 GTPase is an essential component of COPII vesicle coats involved in export of cargo from the ER. We report the 1.7-A structure of Sar1 and find that consistent with the sequence divergence of Sar1 from Arf family GTPases, Sar1 is structurally distinct. In particular, we show that the Sar1 NH2 terminus contains two regions: an NH2-terminal extension containing an evolutionary conserved hydrophobic motif that facilitates membrane recruitment and activation by the mammalian Sec12 guanine nucleotide exchange factor, and an alpha1' amphipathic helix that contributes to interaction with the Sec23/24 complex that is responsible for cargo selection during ER export. We propose that the hydrophobic Sar1 NH2-terminal activation/recruitment motif, in conjunction with the alpha1' helix, mediates the initial steps in COPII coat assembly for export from the ER.     

Mechanism of endophilin N-BAR domain-mediated membrane curvature

Endophilin-A1 is a BAR domain-containing protein enriched at synapses and is implicated in synaptic vesicle endocytosis. It binds to dynamin and synaptojanin via a C-terminal SH3 domain. We examine the mechanism by which the BAR domain and an N-terminal amphipathic helix, which folds upon membrane binding, work as a functional unit (the N-BAR domain) to promote dimerisation and membrane curvature generation. By electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, we show that this amphipathic helix is peripherally bound in the plane of the membrane, with the midpoint of insertion aligned with the phosphate level of headgroups. This places the helix in an optimal position to effect membrane curvature generation. We solved the crystal structure of rat endophilin-A1 BAR domain and examined a distinctive insert protruding from the membrane interaction face. This insert is predicted to form an additional amphipathic helix and is important for curvature generation. Its presence defines an endophilin/nadrin subclass of BAR domains. We propose that N-BAR domains function as low-affinity dimers regulating binding partner recruitment to areas of high membrane curvature.     

Regulation of Sar1 NH2 terminus by GTP binding and hydrolysis promotes membrane deformation to control COPII vesicle fission

The mechanisms by which the coat complex II (COPII) coat mediates membrane deformation and vesicle fission are unknown. Sar1 is a structural component of the membrane-binding inner layer of COPII (Bi, X., R.A. Corpina, and J. Goldberg. 2002. Nature. 419:271-277). Using model liposomes we found that Sar1 uses GTP-regulated exposure of its NH2-terminal tail, an amphipathic peptide domain, to bind, deform, constrict, and destabilize membranes. Although Sar1 activation leads to constriction of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membranes, progression to effective vesicle fission requires a functional Sar1 NH2 terminus and guanosine triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis. Inhibition of Sar1 GTP hydrolysis, which stabilizes Sar1 membrane binding, resulted in the formation of coated COPII vesicles that fail to detach from the ER. Thus Sar1-mediated GTP binding and hydrolysis regulates the NH2-terminal tail to perturb membrane packing, promote membrane deformation, and control vesicle fission.     

Parameters modulating the maximum insertion pressure of proteins and peptides in lipid monolayers

The lipid monolayer model membrane is useful for studying the parameters responsible for protein and peptide membrane binding. Different approaches have been used to determine the extent of protein and peptide binding to lipid monolayers. This review focuses on the use of the “maximum insertion pressure” (MIP) to estimate the extent of protein and peptide penetration in lipid monolayers. The MIP data obtained with different proteins and peptides have been reviewed and discussed which allowed to draw conclusions on the parameters modulating the monolayer binding of proteins and peptides. In particular, secondary structure components such as amphipathic α-helices of proteins and peptides as well as electrostatic interactions play important roles in monolayer binding. The MIPs have been compared to the estimated lateral pressure of biomembranes which allowed to evaluate the possible association between proteins or peptides with natural membranes. For example, the MIP of a membrane-anchored protein with a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) was found to be far below the estimated lateral pressure of biomembranes. This allowed us to conclude that this protein is probably unable to penetrate the membrane and should thus be hanged at the membrane surface by use of its GPI lipid anchor. Moreover, the values of MIP obtained with myristoylated and non-myristoylated forms of calcineurin suggest that the myristoyl group does not contribute to monolayer binding. However, the acylation of a peptide resulted in a large increase of MIP. Finally, the physical state of lipid monolayers can have a strong effect on the values of MIP such that it is preferable to perform measurements with lipids showing a single physical state. Altogether the data show that the measurement of the maximum insertion pressure provides very useful information on the membrane binding properties of proteins and peptides although uncertainties must be provided to make sure the observed differences are significant.     

Membrane reshaping by protein condensates

Proteins can organize into dynamic, functionally important assemblies on fluid membrane surfaces. Phase separation has emerged as an important mechanism for forming such protein assemblies on the membrane during cell signaling, endocytosis, and cytoskeleton regulation. Protein-protein phase separation thus adds novel fluid mosaics to the classical Singer and Nicolson model. Protein condensates formed in this process can modulate membrane morphologies. This is evident from recent reports of protein condensate-driven membrane reshaping in processes such as endocytosis, autophagosome formation, and protein storage vacuole morphogenesis in plants. Lateral phase separation (on the membrane surface) of peripheral curvature coupling proteins can modulate such membrane morphological transitions. Additionally, three-dimensional protein phase separation can result in droplets that through adhesion can affect membrane shape changes. How do these condensate-driven curvature generation mechanisms contrast with the classically recognized scaffolding and amphipathic helix insertion activities of specific membrane remodeling proteins? A salient feature of these condensate-driven membrane activities is that they depend upon both macroscopic features (such as interfacial energies of the condensate, membrane, and cytosol) as well as microscopic, molecular-level interactions (such as protein-lipid binding). This review highlights the current understanding of the mechanisms underlying curvature generation by protein condensates in various biological pathways.     

Tumor protein D54 binds intracellular nanovesicles via an extended amphipathic region

Tumor protein D54 (TPD54) is an abundant cytosolic protein that belongs to the TPD52 family, a family of four proteins (TPD52, 53, 54, and 55) that are overexpressed in several cancer cells. Even though the functions of these proteins remain elusive, recent investigations indicate that TPD54 binds to very small cytosolic vesicles with a diameter of ca. 30 nm, half the size of classical (e.g., COPI and COPII) transport vesicles. Here, we investigated the mechanism of intracellular nanovesicle capture by TPD54. Bioinformatical analysis suggests that TPD54 contains a small coiled-coil followed by four amphipathic helices (AH1-4), which could fold upon binding to lipid membranes. Limited proteolysis, CD spectroscopy, tryptophan fluorescence, and cysteine mutagenesis coupled to covalent binding of a membrane-sensitive probe showed that binding of TPD54 to small liposomes is accompanied by large structural changes in the amphipathic helix region. Furthermore, site-directed mutagenesis indicated that AH2 and AH3 have a predominant role in TPD54 binding to membranes both in cells and using model liposomes. We found that AH3 has the physicochemical features of an amphipathic lipid packing sensor (ALPS) motif, which, in other proteins, enables membrane binding in a curvature-dependent manner. Accordingly, we observed that binding of TPD54 to liposomes is very sensitive to membrane curvature and lipid unsaturation. We conclude that TPD54 recognizes nanovesicles through a combination of ALPS-dependent and ALPS-independent mechanisms.     

Membrane Curvature Sensing by Amphipathic Helices Is Modulated by the Surrounding Protein Backbone

Membrane curvature is involved in numerous biological pathways like vesicle trafficking, endocytosis or nuclear pore complex assembly. In addition to its topological role, membrane curvature is sensed by specific proteins, enabling the coordination of biological processes in space and time. Amongst membrane curvature sensors are the ALPS (Amphipathic Lipid Packing Sensors). ALPS motifs are short peptides with peculiar amphipathic properties. They are found in proteins targeted to distinct curved membranes, mostly in the early secretory pathway. For instance, the ALPS motif of the golgin GMAP210 binds trafficking vesicles, while the ALPS motif of Nup133 targets nuclear pores. It is not clear if, besides curvature sensitivity, ALPS motifs also provide target specificity, or if other domains in the surrounding protein backbone are involved. To elucidate this aspect, we studied the subcellular localization of ALPS motifs outside their natural protein context. The ALPS motifs of GMAP210 or Nup133 were grafted on artificial fluorescent probes. Importantly, ALPS motifs are held in different positions and these contrasting architectures were mimicked by the fluorescent probes. The resulting chimeras recapitulated the original proteins localization, indicating that ALPS motifs are sufficient to specifically localize proteins. Modulating the electrostatic or hydrophobic content of Nup133 ALPS motif modified its avidity for cellular membranes but did not change its organelle targeting properties. In contrast, the structure of the backbone surrounding the helix strongly influenced targeting. In particular, introducing an artificial coiled-coil between ALPS and the fluorescent protein increased membrane curvature sensitivity. This coiled-coil domain also provided membrane curvature sensitivity to the amphipathic helix of Sar1. The degree of curvature sensitivity within the coiled-coil context remains correlated to the natural curvature sensitivity of the helices. This suggests that the chemistry of ALPS motifs is a key parameter for membrane curvature sensitivity, which can be further modulated by the surrounding protein backbone.     

Endophilin BAR domain drives membrane curvature by two newly identified structure-based mechanisms

The crescent-shaped BAR (Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs-homology) domain dimer is a versatile protein module that senses and generates positive membrane curvature. The BAR domain dimer of human endophilin-A1, solved at 3.1 A, has a unique structure consisting of a pair of helix-loop appendages sprouting out from the crescent. The appendage's short helices form a hydrophobic ridge, which runs across the concave surface at its center. Examining liposome binding and tubulation in vitro using purified BAR domain and its mutants indicated that the ridge penetrates into the membrane bilayer and enhances liposome tubulation. BAR domain-expressing cells exhibited marked plasma membrane tubulation in vivo. Furthermore, a swinging-arm mutant lost liposome tubulation activity yet retaining liposome binding. These data suggested that the rigid crescent dimer shape is crucial for the tubulation. We here propose that the BAR domain drives membrane curvature by coordinate action of the crescent's scaffold mechanism and the ridge's membrane insertion in addition to membrane binding via amino-terminal amphipathic helix.     

Sed4p stimulates Sar1p GTP hydrolysis and promotes limited coat disassembly

The coat protein complex II (COPII) generates transport vesicles that mediate protein export from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The first step of COPII vesicle formation involves conversion of Sar1p-GDP to Sar1p-GTP by guanine-nucleotide-exchange factor (GEF) Sec12p. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Sed4p is a structural homolog of Sec12p, but no GEF activity toward Sar1p has been found. Although the role of Sed4p in COPII vesicle formation is implied by the genetic interaction with SAR1, the molecular basis by which Sed4p contributes to this process is unclear. This study showed that the cytoplasmic domain of Sed4p preferentially binds the nucleotide-free form of Sar1p and that Sed4p binding stimulates both the intrinsic and Sec23p GTPase-activating protein (GAP)-accelerated GTPase activity of Sar1p. This stimulation of Sec23p GAP activity by Sed4p leads to accelerated dissociation of coat proteins from membranes. However, Sed4p binding to Sar1p occurs only when cargo is not associated with Sar1p. On the basis of these findings, Sed4p appears to accelerate the dissociation of the Sec23/24p coat from the membrane, but the effect is limited to Sar1p molecules that do not capture cargo protein. We speculate that this restricted coat disassembly may contribute to the concentration of specific cargo molecules into the COPII vesicles.     

Characterization of lipid insertion into monomolecular layers mediated by lung surfactant proteins SP-B and SP-C

Pulmonary surfactant proteins, SP-B and SP-C, if present in preformed monolayers can induce lipid insertion from lipid vesicles into the monolayer after the addition of (divalent) cations [Oosterlaken-Dijksterhuis, M. A., Haagsman, H. P., van Golde, L. M. G., & Demel, R. A. (1991) Biochemistry 30, 8276-8287]. This model system was used to study the mechanisms by which SP-B and SP-C induce monolayer formation from vesicles. Lipid insertion proceeds irrespectively of the molecular class, and PG is not required for this process. In addition to lipids that are immediately inserted from vesicles into the monolayer, large amounts of vesicles are bound to the monolayer and their lipids eventually inserted when the surface area is expanded. SP-B and SP-C are directly responsible for the binding of vesicles to the monolayer. By weight, the vesicle binding capacity of SP-B is approximately 4 times that of SP-C. For vesicle binding and insertion, the formation of close contacts between monolayer and vesicles is essential. SP-B and SP-C show very similar surface properties. Both proteins form extremely stable monolayers (collapse pressures 36-37 mN/m) of alpha-helical structures oriented parallel to the interface. In monolayers consisting of DPPC and SP-B or SP-C, an increase in mean molecular area is observed, which is mainly attributed to the phospholipid. This will greatly enhance the insertion of new lipid material into the monolayer. The results of this study suggest that the surface properties and the hydrophobic nature of SP-B and SP-C are important for the protein-mediated monolayer formation.     

NMR determination of protein partitioning into membrane domains with different curvatures and application to the influenza M2 peptide

The M2 protein of the influenza A virus acts both as a drug-sensitive proton channel and mediates virus budding through membrane scission. The segment responsible for causing membrane curvature is an amphipathic helix in the cytoplasmic domain of the protein. Here, we use ³¹P and ¹³C solid-state NMR to examine M2-induced membrane curvature. M2(22–46), which includes only the transmembrane (TM) helix, and M2(21–61), which contains an additional amphipathic helix, are studied. ³¹P chemical shift lineshapes indicate that M2(21–61) causes a high-curvature isotropic phase to both cholesterol-rich virus-mimetic membranes and 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine bilayers, whereas M2(22–46) has minimal effect. The lamellar and isotropic domains have distinct ³¹P isotropic chemical shifts, indicating perturbation of the lipid headgroup conformation by the amphipathic helix. ³¹P- and ¹³C-detected ¹H T₂ relaxation and two-dimensional peptide-lipid correlation spectra show that M2(21–61) preferentially binds to the high-curvature domain. ³¹P linewidths indicate that the isotropic vesicles induced by M2(21–61) are 10–35 nm in diameter, and the virus-mimetic vesicles are smaller than the 1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine vesicles. A strong correlation is found between high membrane curvature and weak drug-binding ability of the TM helix. Thus, the M2 amphipathic helix causes membrane curvature, which in turn perturbs the TM helix conformation, abolishing drug binding. These NMR experiments are applicable to other curvature-inducing membrane proteins such as fusion proteins and antimicrobial peptides.     

COPII coat assembly and selective export from the endoplasmic reticulum

The coat protein complex II (COPII) generates transport vesicles that mediate protein transport from the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Recent structural and biochemical studies have suggested that the COPII coat is responsible for direct capture of membrane cargo proteins and for the physical deformation of the ER membrane that drives the transport vesicle formation. The COPII-coated vesicle formation at the ER membrane is triggered by the activation of the Ras-like small GTPase Sar1 by GDP/GTP exchange, and activated Sar1 in turn promotes COPII coat assembly. Subsequent GTP hydrolysis by Sar1 leads to disassembly of the coat proteins, which are then recycled for additional rounds of vesicle formation. Thus, the Sar1 GTPase cycle is thought to regulate COPII coat assembly and disassembly. Emerging evidence suggests that the cargo proteins modulate the Sar1 GTP hydrolysis to coordinate coat assembly with cargo selection. Here, I discuss the possible roles of the GTP hydrolysis by Sar1 in COPII coat assembly and selective uptake of cargo proteins into transport vesicles.     

The hydrophobic insertion mechanism of membrane curvature generation by proteins

A wide spectrum of intracellular processes is dependent on the ability of cells to dynamically regulate membrane shape. Membrane bending by proteins is necessary for the generation of intracellular transport carriers and for the maintenance of otherwise intrinsically unstable regions of high membrane curvature in cell organelles. Understanding the mechanisms by which proteins curve membranes is therefore of primary importance. Here we suggest, for the first time to our knowledge, a quantitative mechanism of lipid membrane bending by hydrophobic or amphipathic rodlike inclusions which simulate amphipathic α-helices—structures shown to sculpt membranes. Considering the lipid monolayer matrix as an anisotropic elastic material, we compute the intramembrane stresses and strains generated by the embedded inclusions, determine the resulting membrane shapes, and the accumulated elastic energy. We characterize the ability of an inclusion to bend membranes by an effective spontaneous curvature, and show that shallow rodlike inclusions are more effective in membrane shaping than are lipids having a high propensity for curvature. Our computations provide experimentally testable predictions on the protein amounts needed to generate intracellular membrane shapes for various insertion depths and membrane thicknesses. We also predict that the ability of N-BAR domains to produce membrane tubules in vivo can be ascribed solely to insertion of their amphipathic helices.     

The N-terminal amphipathic helix of the topological specificity factor MinE is associated with shaping membrane curvature

Pole-to-pole oscillations of the Min proteins in Escherichia coli are required for the proper placement of the division septum. Direct interaction of MinE with the cell membrane is critical for the dynamic behavior of the Min system. In vitro, this MinE-membrane interaction led to membrane deformation; however, the underlying mechanism remained unclear. Here we report that MinE-induced membrane deformation involves the formation of an amphipathic helix of MinE(2-9), which, together with the adjacent basic residues, function as membrane anchors. Biochemical evidence suggested that the membrane association induces formation of the helix, with the helical face, consisting of A2, L3, and F6, inserted into the membrane. Insertion of this helix into the cell membrane can influence local membrane curvature and lead to drastic changes in membrane topology. Accordingly, MinE showed characteristic features of protein-induced membrane tubulation and lipid clustering in in vitro reconstituted systems. In conclusion, MinE shares common protein signatures with a group of membrane trafficking proteins in eukaryotic cells. These MinE signatures appear to affect membrane curvature.     

Amphipathic motifs in BAR domains are essential for membrane curvature sensing

BAR (Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs) domains and amphipathic α‐helices (AHs) are believed to be sensors of membrane curvature thus facilitating the assembly of protein complexes on curved membranes. Here, we used quantitative fluorescence microscopy to compare the binding of both motifs on single nanosized liposomes of different diameters and therefore membrane curvature. Characterization of members of the three BAR domain families showed surprisingly that the crescent‐shaped BAR dimer with its positively charged concave face is not able to sense membrane curvature. Mutagenesis on BAR domains showed that membrane curvature sensing critically depends on the N‐terminal AH and furthermore that BAR domains sense membrane curvature through hydrophobic insertion in lipid packing defects and not through electrostatics. Consequently, amphipathic motifs, such as AHs, that are often associated with BAR domains emerge as an important means for a protein to sense membrane curvature. Measurements on single liposomes allowed us to document heterogeneous binding behaviour within the ensemble and quantify the influence of liposome polydispersity on bulk membrane curvature sensing experiments. The latter results suggest that bulk liposome‐binding experiments should be interpreted with great caution.