Goals for Medical Treatment in Obesity and Prediabetes: Improving Outcomes for Both

Objective: The purpose of this review is to expose the surprising prevalence of diabetes-related complications in people with persistent prediabetes, and hence, to expand the paradigm of diabetes prevention to include the prevention of complications related to both hyperglycemia and obesity.Methods: Published literature was reviewed.Results: Approximately 84 million Americans have prediabetes, 85% of whom are overweight or obese. Although the incidence of diabetes-related complications is lower in people with prediabetes versus those with type 2 diabetes, the overall prevalence is virtually identical. Furthermore, many people with prediabetes not only suffer from the complications related to hyperglycemia, they also experience complications of obesity. Treating obesity as a disease has the potential to prevent complications of both hyperglycemia and obesity. Emerging data reveal the untapped potential for clinicians to enhance the effectiveness of anti-obesity medications through a mindful health care delivery style. This involves an understanding and ethical utilization of the placebo effect in conjunction with active medical therapy. This approach is not intended to mislead patients but rather to activate neurocircuitry that synergizes with the central action of the approved anti-obesity medications to potentiate weight loss.Conclusion: Mindful administration of anti-obesity medications has the potential for widespread health benefits in people with obesity and prediabetes.Abbreviations: ADA = American Diabetes Association; DPP = Diabetes Prevention Program; CVD = cardiovascular disease     

Provider Practice Habits And Barriers To Care In Obesity Management In A Large Multicenter Health System

Objective: To identify provider recommendations and barriers in obesity management in a multicenter academic health system with extensive weight-loss management resources.Methods: A 26-question online survey was sent to attending physicians, trainees, and advanced practice providers in primary care specialties (internal medicine, family medicine, women's health) and endocrinology.Results: The survey response rate was 26% (111/430). Of respondents, 50% were internal medicine, 24% family medicine, 16% women's health, and 9% endocrinology. The majority were attending physicians (54%) and residents (40%). About 50% of respondents advised weight loss for a body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m² in >50% of clinic visits. Limited time (82%) was the most common reason for not discussing weight loss, followed by the perception that discussion would not change patient behavior, insufficient knowledge, and discomfort broaching the subject. Common barriers to prescribing anti-obesity medications included limited experience (57%) and concern for adverse reactions (26%). Only 44% offered bariatric surgery to >50% of their patients who met criteria. Primary reasons for not referring included concerns of high surgical risk from comorbidities (57%) and potential adverse events (32%). Endocrinology had the highest referral to surgery. Attending physicians and fellows were more likely than residents to advise weight loss at lower BMI, offer medications, and refer to bariatric surgery.Conclusion: Our study reveals reluctance and lack of primary care confidence in managing obesity with pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery, especially in the earlier stages of obesity. Barriers to care include lack of clinic time, limited experience, and concerns about treatment risks.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; IRB = Institutional Review Board     

High Body Mass Index is A Significant Barrier to Gender-Confirmation Surgery for Transgender and Gender-Nonbinary Individuals

Objective: Transgender and gender-nonbinary individuals (TGNB) are disproportionately impacted by obesity. In addition to the associated health impact, obesity represents a significant barrier to accessing gender-confirmation surgery (GCS). The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of obesity among TGNB surgical candidates at an urban academic medical center and evaluate the efficacy of self-monitored weight management.Methods: The study was conducted at the Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery at Mount Sinai in New York City. Data abstraction from a quality improvement database was completed for patients with a documented body mass index (BMI) and a GCS consult from October 2015 through February 2019. A total of 1,457 TGNB patients with a documented BMI and a GCS consult in the historical period of review were included in analysis. Data were abstracted to determine the prevalence of obesity among GCS candidates and evaluate the current default pre-operative self-monitored weight management protocol.Results: Of 1,457 TGNB patients, 382 (26%) were obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) at initial surgical consult. In addition, 369 (27%) were obese at a subsequent follow-up, suggesting no statistically significant change in the rate of obesity among evaluated TGNB despite self-monitored weight management (P = .5272).Conclusion: Obesity is a significant barrier to gender affirming surgery for transgender individuals. Self-monitored weight management is an unsuccessful strategy for improvement even among individuals who would be predicted to be motivated.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; CTMS = Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery (at Mount Sinai); GCS = gender confirmation surgery; TGNB = transgender and gender-nonbinary     

Long-Term,Sustained, Lifestyle-Induced Weight Loss in Severe Obesity: the Get-Real Program

Objective: To study the long-term effectiveness of a patient-centered, multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention treatment in patients medically eligible for bariatric surgery.Methods: Using a case-control study design, we compared treatment results for 98 adults (mean body mass index [BMI], 44.2 kg/m²) with the outcomes of 148 controls (mean BMI, 43.0 kg/m²) receiving standard care. The approach included a phased triage for inclusion, followed by 12 lifestyle intervention group sessions alternating with individual visits for behavior, diet, and exercise instructions.Results: At 2 years, weight loss averaged 15.3 ± 1.4 kg (P<.0010) (12 ± 1% of initial body weight [IBW], P<.001; 21 ± 2% of excess body weight [EBW], P<.001) in an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis; in completers, weight loss was 18.8 ± 1.5 kg (P<.001) (15 ± 1% IBW, P<.001; 26 ± 3% EBW, P<.001). A total of 42 patients lost ≥10% IBW. Controls remained weight stable (P =.35); 3% lost ≥10% IBW. Patients achieving weight loss that would be considered satisfactory for bariatric surgery included 20% who achieved ≥35% EBW loss, 29% who achieved a BMI <35 kg/m² (if starting BMI <50 kg/m²) or BMI <40 kg/m² (if starting BMI ≥50 kg/m²), and 37% who achieved EBW loss ≤50%. These values for completers were 31, 39, and 48%, respectively. In the 55 patients starting the program ≥4 years ago, weight loss maintenance of 12 ± 1% IBW (ITT, 16 ± 1% in completers) was observed.Conclusion: Substantial nonsurgical weight loss, maintained at 2 to 4 years, is achievable in severely obese patients using comprehensive lifestyle approaches; the efficacy/safety trade-off in obesity treatment is an important consideration in interpreting these results.Abbreviations: BMI = body mass index EBW = excess body weight HbA_1c = glycated hemoglobin IBW = initial body weight LOCFA = last observation carried forward analysis     

High allelic burden of four obesity SNPs is associated with poorer weight loss outcomes following gastric bypass surgery

Genome‐wide association and linkage studies have identified multiple susceptibility loci for obesity. We hypothesized that such loci may affect weight loss outcomes following dietary or surgical weight loss interventions. A total of 1,001 white individuals with extreme obesity (BMI >35 kg/m²) who underwent a preoperative diet/behavioral weight loss intervention and Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass surgery were genotyped for single‐nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in or near the fat mass and obesity‐associated (FTO), insulin induced gene 2 (INSIG2), melanocortin 4 receptor (MC4R), and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 1 (PCSK1) obesity genes. Association analysis was performed using recessive and additive models with pre‐ and postoperative weight loss data. An increasing number of obesity SNP alleles or homozygous SNP genotypes was associated with increased BMI (P < 0.0006) and excess body weight (P < 0.0004). No association between the amounts of weight lost from a short‐term dietary intervention and any individual obesity SNP or cumulative number of obesity SNP alleles or homozygous SNP genotypes was observed. Linear mixed regression analysis revealed significant differences in postoperative weight loss trajectories across groups with low, intermediate, and high numbers of obesity SNP alleles or numbers of homozygous SNP genotypes (P < 0.0001). Initial BMI interacted with genotype to influence weight loss with initial BMI <50 kg/m², with evidence of a dosage effect, which was not present in individuals with initial BMI ≥50 kg/m². Differences in metabolic rate, binge eating behavior, and other clinical parameters were not associated with genotype. These data suggest that response to a surgical weight loss intervention is influenced by genetic susceptibility and BMI.     

Application Of The Aace/Ace Advanced Framework For The Diagnosis Of Obesity And Cardiometabolic Disease Staging In A General Population From 3 Regions Of Venezuela: The Vemsols Study Results

Objective: To determine the prevalence of obesity according to the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists/American College of Endocrinology (AACE/ACE) framework based on a complications-centric model with further application of the Cardiometabolic Disease Staging (CMDS) system in a Venezuelan population.Methods: A total of 1,320 adults were randomly selected from 3 regions. The AACE/ACE framework definitions were as follows: overweight, body mass index (BMI) 25 to 29.9 kg/m² and no obesity-related complications (ORC); obesity stage 0, BMI ≥30 and no ORC; stage 1, BMI ≥25 and 1 or more mild-to-moderate ORC; and stage 2, BMI ≥25 and 1 or more severe ORC. CMDS definitions were as follows: stage 0, no metabolic syndrome (MS) components; stage 1, 1 to 2 MS components without impaired fasting glucose (IFG); stage 2, IFG or ≥3 MS components but without IFG; stage 3, IFG and MS; and stage 4, type 2 diabetes (T2D) or cardiovascular disease.Results: The mean age was 44.8 ± 0.4 years, and 68.5% were female. The prevalence of obesity according to the AACE/ACE framework was 63.1%: overweight 3.0% (95% confidence interval &lsqb;CI]: 2.1–3.9); obesity stage 0: 0.1% (0.07–0.27); obesity stage 1: 26.6% (24.2–29.0); and obesity stage 2: 36.4% (33.8–39.0). Most subjects with a BMI <25 were CMDS 0 or 1. In those with BMI ≥ 25, only 4.6% were CMDS 0. The prevalence of obesity according to the World Health Organization (WHO, BMI ≥30) was 29.3% (24.7–33.7).Conclusion: In a general population study, applying the AACE/ACE framework for obesity and CMDS increased the detection of ORC and therefore higher risk subjects compared to classic anthropometric measurements.Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists; ACE = American College of Endocrinology; BMI = body mass index; CMDS = Cardiometabolic Disease Staging; DALY = disability-adjusted life years; LA = Latin America; MS = metabolic syndrome; ORC = obesity-related complications; WC = waist circumference; WHO = World Health Organization     

Obesity in Older Adults: Technical Review and Position Statement of the American Society for Nutrition and NAASO,The Obesity Society

Obesity causes serious medical complications and impairs quality of life. Moreover, in older persons, obesity can exacerbate the age‐related decline in physical function and lead to frailty. However, appropriate treatment for obesity in older persons is controversial because of the reduction in relative health risks associated with increasing body mass index and the concern that weight loss could have potential harmful effects in the older population. This joint position statement from the American Society for Nutrition and NAASO, The Obesity Society reviews the clinical issues related to obesity in older persons and provides health professionals with appropriate weight‐management guidelines for obese older patients. The current data show that weight‐loss therapy improves physical function, quality of life, and the medical complications associated with obesity in older persons. Therefore, weight‐loss therapy that minimizes muscle and bone losses is recommended for older persons who are obese and who have functional impairments or medical complications that can benefit from weight loss.     

Prevalence and Clinical Determinants of Obesity in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study

ObjectiveTo determine the prevalence of obesity and assess the cardiometabolic risk profile and treatments associated with obesity management in the type 1 diabetes mellitus adult population.MethodsWe reviewed the records of all patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus seen in our institution’s outpatient endocrinology clinic between 2015 and 2018. We stratified the patients into 4 weight categories on the basis of body mass index (BMI) (normal, overweight, obesity class I, and combined obesity class II and III) and evaluated their associated clinical characteristics and relevant medications.ResultsOf 451 patients, 64% had a BMI of >25 kg/m², and 25% had a BMI of ≥30 kg/m². Over 40% of patients with a BMI of >30 kg/m² had a history of cardiovascular disease. The off-label use of the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist was 12% and the sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor use was 5% in those with obesity. Only 2 patients were prescribed phentermine and 3 had undergone bariatric surgery. Hemoglobin A1C and low-density lipoprotein did not significantly differ between the normal weight and obesity groups. The obesity groups had significantly higher levels of median triglycerides and lower high-density lipoprotein than the normal weight group.ConclusionObesity was prevalent in a population of patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus seen in a specialty clinic. Those with obesity had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular disease than their normal weight counterparts. The use of weight loss medications was scarce. Studies exploring the safety and efficacy of obesity-targeted therapy in the type 1 diabetes mellitus population are needed.     

Obesity: Overview of Weight Management

IntroductionObesity is a chronic illness that requires a multifaceted personalized treatment approach.Methods & FindingsUsing current guidelines and recent studies in weight management, this article reviews the multiple components of weight management: lifestyle intervention (dietary intervention, physical activity, and behavioral interventions), pharmacotherapy, endoscopic procedures, and surgical procedures. This review briefly discusses specific diets and dietary strategies, compensatory mechanisms acting against weight loss, recent changes to Food and Drug Administration approved antiobesity medications, and technological advances in weight management delivery.ConclusionCurrent literature is lacking large studies on the safety and efficacy of combination therapies involving pharmacotherapy plus 1 or more procedures.     

Bariatric surgery for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus requiring insulin: Clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness analyses

BackgroundAlthough bariatric surgery is well established as an effective treatment for patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), there exists reluctance to increase its availability for patients with severe T2DM. The aims of this study were to examine the impact of bariatric surgery on T2DM resolution in patients with obesity and T2DM requiring insulin (T2DM-Ins) using data from a national database and to develop a health economic model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of surgery in this cohort when compared to best medical treatment (BMT).Methods and findingsClinical data from the National Bariatric Surgical Registry (NBSR), a comprehensive database of bariatric surgery in the United Kingdom, were extracted to analyse outcomes of patients with obesity and T2DM-Ins who underwent primary bariatric surgery between 2009 and 2017. Outcomes for this group were combined with data sourced from a comprehensive literature review in order to develop a state-transition microsimulation model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of bariatric surgery versus BMT for patients over a 5-year time horizon. The main outcome measure for the clinical study was insulin cessation at 1-year post-surgery: relative risks (RR) summarising predictive factors were determined, unadjusted, and after adjusting for variables including age, initial body mass index (BMI), duration of T2DM, and weight loss. Main outcome measures for the economic evaluation were total costs, total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at willingness-to-pay threshold of GBP£20,000.A total of 2,484 patients were eligible for inclusion, of which 1,847 had 1-year follow-up data (mean age of 51 years, mean initial BMI 47.2 kg/m², and 64% female). 67% of patients no longer required insulin at 1-year postoperatively: these rates persisted for 4 years. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) was associated with a higher rate of insulin cessation (71.7%) than sleeve gastrectomy (SG; 64.5%; RR 0.92, confidence interval (CI) 0.86–0.99) and adjustable gastric band (AGB; 33.6%; RR 0.45, CI 0.34–0.60; p < 0.001). When adjusted for percentage total weight loss and demographic variables, insulin cessation following surgery was comparable for RYGB and SG (RR 0.97, CI 0.90–1.04), with AGB having the lowest cessation rates (RR 0.55, CI 0.40–0.74; p < 0.001). Over 5 years, bariatric surgery was cost saving compared to BMT (total cost GBP£22,057 versus GBP£26,286 respectively, incremental difference GBP£4,229). This was due to lower treatment costs as well as reduced diabetes-related complications costs and increased health benefits. Limitations of this study include loss to follow-up of patients within the NBSR dataset and that the time horizon for the economic analysis is limited to 5 years. In addition, the study reflects current medical and surgical treatment regimens for this cohort of patients, which may change.ConclusionsIn this study, we observed that in patients with obesity and T2DM-Ins, bariatric surgery was associated with high rates of postoperative cessation of insulin therapy, which is, in turn, a major driver of overall reductions in direct healthcare cost. Our findings suggest that a strategy utilising bariatric surgery for patients with obesity and T2DM-Ins is cost saving to the national healthcare provider (National Health Service (NHS)) over a 5-year time horizon.

Emma Rose McGlone and colleagues report the clinical and cost- effectiveness of bariatric surgery for patients with Type 2 diabetes.     

Metabolic surgery for type 2 diabetes mellitus

Background: Metabolic surgery for morbid obesity induces significant weight loss and resolution of many obesity-related comorbidities, the most notable of which is remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). Such changes seem to precede significant weight loss in this population shortly after undergoing diversionary procedures.Objective: This article explores the evidence for salutary metabolic benefits of bariatric surgery, with special emphasis on glycemic control and remission of type 2 DM.Methods: We conducted a query of the PubMed database for articles published in English within the past 15 years using the search terms bariatric surgery, obesity, type 2 diabetes, gastric bypass, gastric banding, incretins, enteroinsular axis, GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1), and GIP (glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide). We targeted review articles as well as those discussing the effects of bariatric surgery on the enteroinsular axis and the respective effects on glyce-mic control.Results: Most of the clinical reports indicated a high remission rate (≥85%) for type 2 DM, and relatively higher rates in patients who underwent diversionary procedures. Studies with small cohorts and laboratory data suggested a role for gastrointestinal hormones in the regulation of glucose homeostasis after bariatric surgery.Conclusions: Gastrointestinal surgery for severe obesity, through restrictive and/or neurohormonal effects, is an effective treatment for type 2 DM. Surgically induced weight loss was found to be sustainable, durable, and associated with remission of type 2 DM, a reduction in mortality, and improvement in quality of life.     

Gastric Bypass in a Low‐Income,Inner‐City Population: Eating Disturbances and Weight Loss

Objective: To examine the prevalence of eating disturbances and psychiatric disorders among extremely obese patients before and after gastric bypass surgery and to examine the relationship between these disturbances and weight outcomes. Research Methods and Procedures: Sixty‐five women patients (ages 19 to 67) with a mean BMI of 54.1 were assessed by semistructured psychiatric interview before surgery and by telephone interview after surgery (mean follow‐up: 16.4 months) to determine psychiatric status, eating disturbances, and weight and health‐related variables. Results: Patients lost a mean of 71% of their excess BMI, with significantly poorer weight loss outcomes among African Americans. Psychiatric disorders remained prevalent before (37%) and after (41%) surgery. In contrast, binge eating disorder dropped from 48% to 0%. Psychiatric diagnosis did not affect weight outcomes. Instead, more frequent preoperative binge eating, along with greater initial BMI, follow‐up length, and postoperative exercise, predicted greater BMI loss. Postsurgical health behaviors (exercise and smoking) and nocturnal eating episodes were also linked to weight loss. Exercise frequency increased and smoking frequency tended to decrease after surgery. Discussion: These findings indicated that eating and psychiatric disturbances did not inhibit weight loss after gastric bypass and should not contraindicate surgery. Prior binge eating, eliminated after surgery, predicted BMI loss and, thus, may have previously been a maintaining factor in the obesity of these patients. The association between health behaviors and outcome suggests possible targets for intervention to improve surgical results. Poorer outcomes among African Americans indicate that these patients should be closely monitored and supported after surgery.     

Anti-Obesity Pharmacotherapy and the Potential for Preventing Progression from Prediabetes to Type 2 Diabetes

Objective: Type 2 diabetes and its associated complications place heavy burdens on affected individuals, their caregivers, and society. The prevalence of type 2 diabetes is increasing worldwide. Attempts to combat this problem have been extended to the treatment of obesity and prevention of progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes. As such, weight loss is an important component of type 2 diabetes prevention. However, successful strategies for achieving sustained weight loss have remained elusive. Although lifestyle modification remains a cornerstone of this approach, it has become clear that changes to lifestyle alone will not suffice for many patients. A pragmatic approach includes consideration of pharmacotherapeutic options.Methods: This review discusses the different pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of obesity and prediabetes.Results: Approved anti-obesity therapies and antihyperglycemic agents associated with weight loss may prove effective earlier in the treatment paradigm, and other promising agents that are in clinical development for chronic weight management show promise for both weight reduction and a reduction in the risk of type 2 diabetes in high-risk individuals.Conclusion: Long-term evaluation of safety and efficacy is required for many of these agents before we can begin to optimize their use in clinical practice, but treatment choices for obese or prediabetic patients are increasing.Abbreviations: AACE = American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists ADA = American Diabetes Association AE = adverse event AMA = American Medical Association BMI = body mass index CI = confidence interval CR = controlled release DPP = Diabetes Prevention Program IFG = impaired fasting glucose IGT = impaired glucose tolerance FDA = Food and Drug Administration FPG = fasting plasma glucose GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide-1 GLP-1 RA = glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist HbA_1c= glycosylated hemoglobin ITT-LOCF = intention-totreat with last observation carried forward LS = least squares NB = naltrexone/bupropion OR = odds ratio PHEN = phentermine PYE = patient years of exposure PYY = peptide YY SGLT-2 = sodium glucose cotransporter 2 TPM = topiramate TZD = thiazolidinedione     

Risks and Benefits of Estrogen Therapy for a Male-to-Female Transsexual with a Prothrombin Gene Mutation

ObjectiveWe present the case of a male-to-female transsexual person in her 20s requesting hormone therapy in the setting of a history of a deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus and carrying the prothrombin G20210A gene mutation.MethodsWe interviewed the patient and reviewed her medical records. We carefully weighed the risks and benefits of hormone therapy and took into account two important ethical principles: beneficence (to act in the patient’s best interest) and nonmaleficence (to avoid harm).ResultsOur patient presented to an outside facility with weight loss, generalized weakness, right lower extremity swelling, and chest pain. She was diagnosed with a pulmonary embolus and extensive deep venous thrombus by computed tomography (CT) scan and Doppler ultrasound, respectively. She was found to carry the pro-thrombin G20210A gene mutation. She was treated with anticoagulation therapy for 12 months, which was restarted prior to beginning therapy with transdermal estrogen.ConclusionWhile the exact risk of recurrent deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus in our patient is unknown, we recommended that hormone therapy should only be given in conjunction with anticoagulation. We speculate that this strategy would allow the patient to experience the benefits to her overall well-being with hormone therapy while reducing the risks of venous thrombosis to acceptable levels. Prospective long-term follow-up of this patient is needed to verify the benefits and risk of the intervention chosen. (Endocr. Pract. 2013;19:e150-e153)     

Bariatric Surgery Patients’ Views of Their Physicians’ Weight‐Related Attitudes and Practices

Objective: A prior study found that nearly 80% of bariatric surgery patients felt that they were treated disrespectfully by members of the medical profession. This study assessed patient‐physician interactions in a group of bariatric surgery patients and in a group of less obese patients who sought weight loss by other means. Research Methods and Procedures: A total of 105 bariatric surgery candidates (mean BMI, 54.8 kg/m²) and 214 applicants to a randomized controlled trial of the effects of behavior modification and sibutramine (mean BMI, 37.8 kg/m²) completed a questionnaire that assessed patient‐physician interactions concerning weight. Results: Only 13% of bariatric surgery patients reported that they were usually or always treated disrespectfully by members of the medical profession, a percentage substantially lower than that found in the previous study. Surprisingly, surgery patients were significantly more satisfied than nonsurgery patients with the care they received for their obesity. Surgery patients also reported significantly more interactions with physicians concerning obesity and weight loss compared with nonsurgery patients. A substantial percentage of both groups, however, reported that their physician did not discuss weight control with them. Discussion: These and other findings suggest that doctor‐patient interactions concerning weight may have improved in the past decade; however, there is still much room for improvement. Increased efforts are needed to help physicians discuss, assess, and potentially treat obesity in primary care practice.     

Treatment of Hypothalamic Obesity with Caffeine and Ephedrine

ObjectiveTo investigate the hypothesis that the peripheral actions of caffeine and ephedrine to increase sympathetic tone and metabolic rate and to preserve lean tissue will cause weight loss in patients with hypothalamic obesity.MethodsWe present 3 case studies of consecutive patients who presented with hypothalamic obesity and were treated with caffeine (200 mg) and ephedrine hydrochloride (25 mg) 3 times a day.ResultsAll patients were gaining weight at the time of initial assessment. The first patient lost 8% to 9% of her body weight and maintained that loss for the subsequent 2 years. The second patient lost 18.8% of her body weight and was maintaining a 9.5% weight loss after 6 years. The third patient lost 14% of her body weight during a 6- month period and gradually returned to her baseline weight during a period of 5 years, after which she was referred for bariatric surgical treatment.ConclusionThese 3 patients with hypothalamic obesity, who had been steadily gaining weight, lost a mean of 13.9% of their body weight, and 2 of them maintained weight loss for a period of years. Thus, caffeine and ephedrine appeared to halt weight gain and maintain a clinically significant weight loss in 2 of our 3 patients. A randomized clinical trial to confirm these findings would be appropriate but difficult because of the rarity of this disorder. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:697-703)     

Health Outcomes of Gastric Bypass Patients Compared to Nonsurgical,Nonintervened Severely Obese

Favorable health outcomes at 2 years postbariatric surgery have been reported. With exception of the Swedish Obesity Subjects (SOS) study, these studies have been surgical case series, comparison of surgery types, or surgery patients compared to subjects enrolled in planned nonsurgical intervention. This study measured gastric bypass effectiveness when compared to two separate severely obese groups not participating in designed weight‐loss intervention. Three groups of severely obese subjects (N = 1,156, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m²) were studied: gastric bypass subjects (n = 420), subjects seeking gastric bypass but did not have surgery (n = 415), and population‐based subjects not seeking surgery (n = 321). Participants were studied at baseline and 2 years. Quantitative outcome measures as well as prevalence, incidence, and resolution rates of categorical health outcome variables were determined. All quantitative variables (BMI, blood pressure, lipids, diabetes‐related variables, resting metabolic rate (RMR), sleep apnea, and health‐related quality of life) improved significantly in the gastric bypass group compared with each comparative group (all P < 0.0001, except for diastolic blood pressure and the short form (SF‐36) health survey mental component score at P < 0.01). Diabetes, dyslipidemia, and hypertension resolved much more frequently in the gastric bypass group than in the comparative groups (all P < 0.001). In the surgical group, beneficial changes of almost all quantitative variables correlated significantly with the decrease in BMI. We conclude that Roux‐en‐Y gastric bypass surgery when compared to severely obese groups not enrolled in planned weight‐loss intervention was highly effective for weight loss, improved health‐related quality of life, and resolution of major obesity‐associated complications measured at 2 years.     

“Metabolic” Surgery For Treatment Of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo discuss the potential contribution of “metabolic” surgery in providing optimal management of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsA literature search was performed with use of PubMed, and the clinical experience of the authors was also considered.ResultsBariatric—or, more appropriately, metabolic—surgical procedures have been shown to provide dramatic improvement in blood glucose levels, blood pressure, and lipid control in obese patients with T2DM. In these patients, metabolic surgery involves a low risk of short-term mortality and a significant long-term survival advantage, whereas the diagnosis of diabetes is associated with significant long-term mortality. Experimental studies in animals and clinical trials suggest that gastrointestinal bypass procedures can control diabetes and associated metabolic alterations by mechanisms independent of weight loss. As a result, the use of bariatric surgery and experimental gastrointestinal manipulations to treat T2DM is increasing, even among less obese patients. Although body mass index (BMI) currently is the most important factor for identifying candidates for bariatric surgery, evidence shows that a specific cutoff BMI value cannot accurately predict successful surgical outcomes. Furthermore, BMI appears limited in defining the risk profile for patients with T2DM.ConclusionCurrent BMI-based criteria for performance of bariatric surgery are not adequate for determining eligibility for operative treatment in patients with diabetes. Large clinical trials, comparing bariatric surgery versus optimal medical care of patients with T2DM, should be given priority in order to define the role of surgery in the management of diabetes. Recognizing the need to work as a multidisciplinary team that includes endocrinologists and surgeons is an initial step in addressing the issues and opportunities that surgery offers to diabetes care and research. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:624-631)     

COUNTERPOINT: Artificial Sweeteners for Obesity—Better than Sugary Alternatives; Potentially a Solution

ObjectiveNonnutritive (NNSs) are used in place of sugars to reduce caloric and glycemic intake while providing desired sweetness, commonly replacing sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) with “diet” (zero-calorie) alternatives. Concern has developed due to observational data associating NNSs with obesity and adiposity-based chronic disease. This counterpoint argues that, in general, NNSs used in place of added or excess sugars in the diet are likely beneficial.MethodsA literature review was conducted on interventional trials investigating NNSs and obesity or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Key words used in the search included artificial sweeteners, nonnutritive sweeteners, saccharin, sucralose, aspartame, stevia/steviol, acesulfame potassium, meal replacements, type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, and weight.ResultsInterventional data and indirect interventional data consistently showed beneficial effects on weight and cardiometabolic health, including glycemia, when SSBs or other energy-dense foods were replaced by artificially sweetened beverages or artificially sweetened meal replacements.ConclusionAlthough NNSs correlate with obesity and adiposity-based chronic disease, those data are fraught with confounding and error. Plausibility has been suggested on the basis of preclinical research on neuroendocrine control of appetite, satiety, and cravings plus the gut microbiome. However, interventional data reveal that replacing caloric/glycemic energy intake via NNSs creates an energy deficit resulting in weight loss and improvement in disease—especially dysglycemic disease. Intensive dietary intervention using artificially sweetened meal replacements shows a marked clinical benefit without detriment from their NNSs. Furthermore, beverages sweetened with NNSs rather than SSBs have been noted to be a critical component for those succeeding in maintaining weight loss. Although individual responses to the effects of NNSs are always warranted just like in any clinical situation, patients should not be advised to avoid NNSs in the context of dietary intervention to improve quality and energy deficit.     

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Consensus Statement: Addressing Stigma and Bias in the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Obesity/Adiposity-Based Chronic Disease and Assessing Bias and Stigmatization as Determinants of Disease Severity

ObjectiveTo focus on the intersection of perception, diagnosis, stigma, and weight bias in the management of obesity and obtain consensus on actionable steps to improve care provided for persons with obesity.MethodsThe American Association of Clinical Endocrinology (AACE) convened a consensus conference of interdisciplinary health care professionals to discuss the interplay between the diagnosis of obesity using adiposity-based chronic disease (ABCD) nomenclature and staging, weight stigma, and internalized weight bias (IWB) with development of actionable guidance to aid clinicians in mitigating IWB and stigma in that context.ResultsThe following affirmed and emergent concepts were proposed: (1) obesity is ABCD, and these terms can be used in differing ways to communicate; (2) classification categories of obesity should have improved nomenclature across the spectrum of body mass index (BMI) using ethnic-specific BMI ranges and waist circumference (WC); (3) staging the clinical severity of obesity based on the presence and severity of ABCD complications may reduce weight-centric contribution to weight stigma and IWB; (4) weight stigma and internalized bias are both drivers and complications of ABCD and can impair quality of life, predispose to psychological disorders, and compromise the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions; (5) the presence and of stigmatization and IWB should be assessed in all patients and be incorporated into the staging of ABCD severity; and (6) optimal care will necessitate increased awareness and the development of educational and interventional tools for health care professionals that address IWB and stigma.ConclusionsThe consensus panel has proposed an approach for integrating bias and stigmatization, psychological health, and social determinants of health in a staging system for ABCD severity as an aid to patient management. To effectively address stigma and IWB within a chronic care model for patients with obesity, there is a need for health care systems that are prepared to provide evidence-based, person-centered treatments; patients who understand that obesity is a chronic disease and are empowered to seek care and participate in behavioral therapy; and societies that promote policies and infrastructure for bias-free compassionate care, access to evidence-based interventions, and disease prevention.