Potential Place of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Treatment Paradigms for type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Objective: Following the first Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval in 2013, sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have generated much interest among physicians treating patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Here, the role in treatment with this drug class is considered in the context of T2DM treatment paradigms.Methods: The clinical trials for the SGLT2 inhibitors are examined with a focus on canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin.Results: Evidence from clinical trials in patients with T2DM supports the use of SGLT2 inhibitors either as monotherapy or in addition to other glucose-lowering treatments as adjuncts to diet and exercise, and we have gained significant clinical experience in a relatively short time.Conclusion: The drugs appear to be useful in a variety of T2DM populations, contingent primarily on renal function. Most obviously, SGLT2 inhibitors appear to be well suited for patients with potential for hypoglycemia or weight gain. In clinical trials, patients treated with SGLT2 inhibitors have experienced moderate weight loss and a low risk of hypoglycemic events except when used in combination with an insulin secretagogue. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors have been shown to reduce blood pressure, so they may be beneficial in patients with T2DM complicated by hypertension. SGLT2 inhibitors were incorporated into the 2015 American Diabetes Association (ADA)/European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) position statement on the management of hyperglycemia and received an even more prominent position in the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE)/American College of Endocrinology (ACE) comprehensive diabetes management guidelines and algorithm.Abbreviations: AE = adverse event A1C = glycated hemoglobin CI = confidence interval CKD = chronic kidney disease DKA = diabetic ketoacidosis DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase 4 eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate FDA = Food and Drug Administration FPG = fasting plasma glucose GLP-1 = glucagon-like peptide 1 HDL-C = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol HR = hazard ratio LADA = late-onset autoimmune diabetes of adulthood LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol MACE = major adverse cardiovascular events SGLT1 = sodium glucose cotransporter 1 SGLT2 = sodium glucose cotransporter 2 T1DM = type 1 diabetes mellitus T2DM = type 2 diabetes mellitus UACR = urine albumin to creatinine ratio     

Reshaping Diabetes Care: The Fundamental Role of Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors and Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Clinical Practice

ObjectiveTo update clinicians on the most recent safety and efficacy data on current incretin-based strategies for the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D).MethodsTitle searches were conducted in the Pubmed database to identify literature pertaining to the safety and efficacy of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Product-specific title searches included the terms exenatide, liraglutide, linagliptin, saxagliptin, sita-gliptin, and vildagliptin.ResultsThe recent literature has introduced us to newer DPP-4 inhibitors and longer-acting GLP-1RAs, updated meta-analyses assessing the safety and efficacy of incretin-based therapies, and studies exploring the use of incretin-based treatments in broader clinical settings such as combination therapy with insulin. Meta-analyses have demonstrated placebo-adjusted glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) reductions of ~1% with GLP-1RAs and 0.6 to 0.8% with DPP-4 inhibitors and have suggested cardioprotective effects such as reduction of cardiovascular events and improvement of lipid profile. As a class, these agents have consistently demonstrated low risks of hypoglycemia relative to other agents.ConclusionIncretin-based therapies are characterized by an overall favorable safety profile and weight effect, a low risk of hypoglycemia, and clinically meaningful improvements in HbA1c. Based on an expanding and favorable literature describing their use in various patient populations, the guidelines of the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and the recently updated guidelines from the American Diabetes Association assign these agents a central role in the treatment of T2D. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:718-728)     

磷酸西格列汀治疗2型糖尿病疗效观察

目的：观察口服降糖药磷酸西格列汀对2型糖尿病患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法：对47例血糖控制欠佳的2型糖尿病患者进行为期12月的磷酸西格列汀治疗并观察,分别在治疗前和治疗3、6、12个月后检测空腹血糖（FBG）、餐后2 h血糖、胰高血糖素、糖化血红蛋白、血常规、血压、肝肾功能、体重。结果：磷酸西格列汀治疗3、6、12个月后空腹血糖及餐后2 h血糖、胰高血糖素、糖化血红蛋白水平均较治疗前明显下降（P〈0.05或0.01）,体重、血压、肝肾功能、血常规无明显变化（均P〉0.05）。结论：磷酸西列汀可显著降低2型糖尿病患者的空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、糖化血红蛋白及抑制α细胞活性,同时无明显副作用,是治疗2型糖尿病有效且安全的口服降糖药。     

磷酸西格列汀治疗2 型糖尿病疗效观察

目的：观察口服降糖药磷酸西格列汀对2 型糖尿病患者的临床疗效及安全性。方法：对47 例血糖控制欠佳的2 型糖尿病患 者进行为期12 月的磷酸西格列汀治疗并观察,分别在治疗前和治疗3、6、12 个月后检测空腹血糖( FBG) 、餐后2 h血糖、胰高血 糖素、糖化血红蛋白、血常规、血压、肝肾功能、体重。结果：磷酸西格列汀治疗3、6、12 个月后空腹血糖及餐后2 h血糖、胰高血糖 素、糖化血红蛋白水平均较治疗前明显下降(P＜0.05 或0.01),体重、血压、肝肾功能、血常规无明显变化(均P＞0.05)。结论：磷酸 西列汀可显著降低2 型糖尿病患者的空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、糖化血红蛋白及抑制α细胞活性,同时无明显副作用,是治疗2 型 糖尿病有效且安全的口服降糖药。     

Novel heterocyclic DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of type 2 diabetes

Novel deazaxanthine-based DPP-4 inhibitors have been identified that are potent (IC(50) <10nM) and highly selective versus other dipeptidyl peptidases. Their synthesis and SAR are reported, along with initial efforts to improve the PK profile through decoration of the deazaxanthine core. Optimisation of compound 3a resulted in the identification of compound (S)-4i, which displayed an improved in vitro and ADME profile. Further enhancements to the PK profile were possible by changing from the deazahypoxanthine to the deazaxanthine template, culminating in compound 12g, which displayed good ex vivo DPP-4 inhibition and a superior PK profile in rat, suggestive of once daily dosing in man.     

Quality of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background

Several studies have reported that clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in a variety of clinical areas are of modest or variable quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate the quality of an international cohort of CPGs that provide recommendations on pharmaceutical management of glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2).

Methods and Findings

We searched the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) on February 15th and June 4th, 2012 for CPGs meeting inclusion criteria. Two independent assessors rated the quality of each CPG using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument. Twenty-four guidelines were evaluated, and most had high scores for clarity and presentation. However, scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, and applicability domains varied considerably. The majority of guidelines scored low on editorial independence, and only seven CPGs were based on an underlying systematic review of the evidence.

Conclusions

The overall quality of CPGs for glycemic control in DM2 is moderate, but there is substantial variability among quality domains within and across guidelines. Guideline users need to be aware of this variability and carefully appraise and select the guidelines that they apply to patient care.     

The Role of Bromocriptine-Qr in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Expert Panel Recommendations

ObjectiveTo review available data on the efficacy and safety of bromocriptine-QR (BQR) and to consider its role in the management of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).MethodsPublished literature reporting the efficacy and safety of BQR in the treatment of T2DM was reviewed, including peer-reviewed abstracts and poster presentations.ResultsBQR is an oral hypoglycemic agent with a novel mechanism of action that appears to involve enhancement of morning central nervous system (CNS) dopaminergic activity, resulting in improved insulin sensitivity and reduced hepatic glucose output. Adjunctive treatment with BQR in the dosing range of 1.6 to 4.8 mg/d may result in a mean (95% confidence interval [CI]) reduction in glycated hemoglobin (A1c) levels of 0.69% (0.97%, 0.41%). Treatment with BQR appears to be associated with minimal intrinsic risk of hypoglycemia, and does not appear to be associated with clinically significant adverse effects on weight, triglycerides, free fatty acids, or blood pressure.ConclusionThe favorable cardiovascular risk profile of BQR suggests that it may be useful in the treatment of patients with T2DM with a history of cardiovascular disease (CVD) or who have significant risk factors for CVD. However, knowledge of the efficacy and safety of BQR is limited by the relatively small clinical trials database. As a result, there is currently insufficient information on the safety and efficacy of adjunctive BQR in T2DM patients being treated with several common diabetes regimens (e.g., thiazolidinediones, insulin). (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:100-106)     

利拉鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病的临床研究进展

利拉鲁肽是一种新型胰高糖素样肽-1 GLP-1类似物,能迅速、高效、持久地降低血糖及糖化血红蛋白,具有改善胰岛β细胞功能、调节收缩压、保护心血管、降低血脂、减轻体重、延迟胃排空、增加饱腹感等作用。此外,利拉鲁肽具有葡萄糖依赖的促胰岛素分泌作用,仅在机体血糖水平高时刺激胰岛素的释放,但当患者体内血糖浓度恢复至正常时,GLP-1分泌促胰岛素的作用便消退,因而发生低血糖事件的几率较低,能有效地改善糖尿病患者的病情,已成为目前2型糖尿病治疗领域的研究热点。本文主要就利拉鲁肽治疗2型糖尿病的临床研究进展进行综述。     

Understanding the Molecular Dynamics of Type-2 Diabetes Drug Target DPP-4 and its Interaction with Sitagliptin and Inhibitor Diprotin-A

The occurrence of type 2 diabetes (T2D) accounts for 90–95 % of all diabetes. Intestine hormone glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) has an antidiabetic role that enhances insulin secretion and pancreatic β-cell proliferation. GLP-1 is degraded by the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) rapidly. Hence, the DPP-4 inhibition has been preferred not only for the treatment but also as a major drug target. Sitagliptin and Diprotin-A are antihyperglycemic agents for the treatment of T2D. However, little is known on the molecular dynamics of DPP-4 and the interaction properties with its ligands, namely Sitagliptin and Diprotin-A. This study has used the latest bioinformatic tools to understand the molecular dynamics and its interaction properties of DPP-4. This study has explored the number of α helices, β strands, β hairpins, Ψ loop, β bulges, β turns, and ? turns and they were 19, 46, 25, 1, 14, 70, and 4, respectively. The highest number of H-bonds was recorded in α helix of domain-1, and the lowest number H-bonds were noted in α helix of domain-2. During interaction between residues, in A- and B-chain, 47 and 48 residues are involved for interaction, and interaction interface area was more in A-Chain (2176 Å²). From DPP-4 and Sitagliptin interaction, three residues in active sites such as Try226, Glu205, and Glu206 were involved in three H-bond formation, while 10 other amino acids (Try547, Try667, Asn710, Val711, His740, Ser630, Ser209, Arg358, Phe357, and Val207) were involved in hydrophobic interactions. In this review, we have shown the importance of bioinformatics as an excellent tool for a rapid method to assess the molecular dynamics and its interaction properties of DPP-4. Our predictions highlighted in this review will help researchers to understand the interaction properties and recognition of interactive sites to design more DPP-4 inhibitors for the treatment of T2D and drug discovery.     

Discovery of new binding elements in DPP-4 inhibition and their applications in novel DPP-4 inhibitor design

Probing with tool molecules, and by modeling and X-ray crystallography the binding modes of two structurally distinct series of DPP-4 inhibitors led to the discovery of a rare aromatic fluorine H-bond and the spatial requirement for better biaryl binding in the DPP-4 enzyme active site. These newly found binding elements were successfully incorporated into novel DPP-4 inhibitors.     

Conflicts of Interest among Authors of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Background

Conflict of interest (COI) is an important potential source of bias in the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

Objectives

To examine rates of disclosure of COI, including financial interests in companies that manufacture drugs that are recommended in CPGs on glycemic control in type 2 diabetes mellitus, and to explore the relationship between recommendations for specific drugs in a guideline and author COI.

Methods

We identified a cohort of relevant guidelines from the National Guideline Clearinghouse (NGC) and abstracted COI disclosures from all guideline authors for this observational, cross-sectional study. We determined which hypoglycemic drugs were recommended in each guideline, and explored the relationship between specific disclosures and whether a drug was recommended.

Results

Among 13 included guidelines, the percentage of authors with one or more financial disclosures varied from 0 to 94% (mean 44.2%), and was particularly high for two US-based guidelines (91% and 94%). Three guidelines disclosed no author financial COI. The percentage of authors with disclosures of financial interests in manufacturers of recommended drugs was also high (mean 30%). On average, 56% of manufacturers of patented drugs recommended in each guideline had one or more authors with a financial interest in their company. We did not find a significant relationship between financial interests and whether a drug was recommended in our sample; US-based guidelines were more likely to make recommendations for a specific drug compared to non-US based guidelines.

Discussion

Authors of this cohort of guidelines have financial interests directly related to the drugs that they are recommending. Although we did not find an association between author COI and drugs recommended in these guidelines and we cannot draw conclusions about the validity of the recommendations, the credibility of many of these guidelines is in doubt.     

Affinity-based ranking of ligands for DPP-4 from mixtures

Affinity-based selection strategies have recently emerged as a complement to traditional high throughput screening for the rapid discovery of lead compounds for the large number of protein targets emerging from--omics technologies. Herein, we describe a method for the ranking of mixtures of ligands by affinity selection and apply it to rank order a set of inhibitors for the enzyme dipeptidyl peptidase IV.     

Revisiting The Use of Pioglitazone in the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes

Abbreviations:CHF = congestive heart failureGLP-1 RA = glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonistT2D = type 2 diabetesTZD = thiazolidinedione     

Predictors of Adherence to Multiple Clinical Preventive Recommendations among Adults with Diabetes in Spain

ObjectiveThis study aims to describe adherence to seven clinical preventive services among Spanish adults with diabetes, to compare adherence with people without diabetes and to identify predictor of adherence to multiple practices among adults with diabetes.DesignCross-sectional study based on data obtained from the European Health Survey for Spain 2009 and the Spanish National Health Survey 2011. We analyzed those aged 40-69 years (n= 20,948). Diabetes status was self-reported. The study variables included adherence to blood pressure (BP) checkup, cholesterol measurement, influenza vaccination, dental examination, fecal occult blood test (FOBT), mammography and cytology. Independent variables included socio-demographic characteristics, variables related to health status and lifestyle factors.ResultsThe study sample included 1,647 subjects with diabetes and 19,301 without. Over 90% had measured their BP and cholesterol in the last year, 44.4% received influenza immunization, 36.4% had a dental checkup within the year and only 8.1% underwent a FOBT. Among diabetic women 75.4% had received a mammography and 52.4% a cytology in the recommended periods. The adherence to BP and cholesterol measurements and influenza vaccination was significantly higher among those suffering diabetes and cytology and dental checkup were lower. Only 63.4% of people with diabetes had fulfilled half or more of the recommended practices. Female sex, higher educational level, being married or cohabiting, higher number of chronic conditions and number of physician visits increased the adherence to multiple preventive practices. For each unhealthy lifestyle reported the probability of having a higher adherence level decreased.ConclusionsAcceptable adherence is found for BP and cholesterol checkups and mammography. Unacceptably low rates were found for influenza vaccine, dental care, cytology and FOBT. Moreover, preventive services are provided neither equitably nor efficiently so future research needs to identify individual and organizational factors that allow interventions to reach these subjects with diabetes.     

Clinical Markers Implying the Need for Treatment in Women with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo assess the association of the point-of-care hemoglobin A_1c (POC A1C), fasting blood glucose (FBG), and BMI with fetal macrosomia and the need for medication in women with gestational diabetes (GDM).MethodsPOC A1C, FBG, and BMI values at GDM diagnosis and fetal weight at delivery were obtained for women identified from a prospective patient registry. These outcomes were compared between women who did not require medication for GDM and women who did require medication.ResultsMean values of POC A1C, FBG, and BMI in 67 patients who required medication were higher than those in 71 patients who did not require medication (POC A1C: 5.72 ± 0.45% vs 5.35 ± 0.46% [P < .001]; FBG: 97.4 ± 12.3 mg/dL vs 86.4 ± 9.5 mg/dL [P < .001]; BMI: 35.4 ± 6.4 kg/m2 vs 30.4 ± 6.2 kg/m2 [P < .001]). There was a modest correlation between POC A1C and FBG (Spearman rho 0.4, P < .001) and between POC A1C and BMI (Spearman rho 0.366, P < .001). Maternal POC A1C was not correlated with fetal weight at delivery (Spearman rho –0.010, P = .915).ConclusionsHigher POC A1C, FBG, and BMI values were associated with the need for medication in women with GDM. The use of clinical markers to assess glycemic control sooner in pregnancy may lead to the earlier identification of women at risk for GDM and earlier intervention to decrease the risk for complications. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:62-65)