Evolution of Conifer Diterpene Synthases: Diterpene Resin Acid Biosynthesis in Lodgepole Pine and Jack Pine Involves Monofunctional and Bifunctional Diterpene Synthases

Abscisic acid (ABA) induces stomatal closure and inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. The mechanisms in these two processes are not necessarily the same. It has been postulated that the ABA receptors involved in opening inhibition are different from those involved in closure induction. Here, we provide evidence that four recently identified ABA receptors (PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE1 [PYR1], PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE1 [PYL1], PYL2, and PYL4) are not sufficient for opening inhibition in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). ABA-induced stomatal closure was impaired in the pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4 quadruple ABA receptor mutant. ABA inhibition of the opening of the mutant’s stomata remained intact. ABA did not induce either the production of reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide or the alkalization of the cytosol in the quadruple mutant, in accordance with the closure phenotype. Whole cell patch-clamp analysis of inward-rectifying K⁺ current in guard cells showed a partial inhibition by ABA, indicating that the ABA sensitivity of the mutant was not fully impaired. ABA substantially inhibited blue light-induced phosphorylation of H⁺-ATPase in guard cells in both the mutant and the wild type. On the other hand, in a knockout mutant of the SNF1-related protein kinase, srk2e, stomatal opening and closure, reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide production, cytosolic alkalization, inward-rectifying K⁺ current inactivation, and H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation were not sensitive to ABA.The phytohormone abscisic acid (ABA), which is synthesized in response to abiotic stresses, plays a key role in the drought hardiness of plants. Reducing transpirational water loss through stomatal pores is a major ABA response (Schroeder et al., 2001). ABA promotes the closure of open stomata and inhibits the opening of closed stomata. These effects are not simply the reverse of one another (Allen et al., 1999; Wang et al., 2001; Mishra et al., 2006).A class of receptors of ABA was identified (Ma et al., 2009; Park et al., 2009; Santiago et al., 2009; Nishimura et al., 2010). The sensitivity of stomata to ABA was strongly decreased in quadruple and sextuple mutants of the ABA receptor genes PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE/PYRABACTIN RESISTANCE-LIKE/REGULATORY COMPONENT OF ABSCISIC ACID RECEPTOR (PYR/PYL/RCAR; Nishimura et al., 2010; Gonzalez-Guzman et al., 2012). The PYR/PYL/RCAR receptors are involved in the early ABA signaling events, in which a sequence of interactions of the receptors with PROTEIN PHOSPHATASE 2Cs (PP2Cs) and subfamily 2 SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASES (SnRK2s) leads to the activation of downstream ABA signaling targets in guard cells (Cutler et al., 2010; Kim et al., 2010; Weiner et al., 2010). Studies of Commelina communis and Vicia faba suggested that the ABA receptors involved in stomatal opening are not the same as the ABA receptors involved in stomatal closure (Allan et al., 1994; Anderson et al., 1994; Assmann, 1994; Schwartz et al., 1994). The roles of PYR/PYL/RCAR in either stomatal opening or closure remained to be elucidated.Blue light induces stomatal opening through the activation of plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase in guard cells that generates an inside-negative electrochemical gradient across the plasma membrane and drives K⁺ uptake through voltage-dependent inward-rectifying K⁺ channels (Assmann et al., 1985; Shimazaki et al., 1986; Blatt, 1987; Schroeder et al., 1987; Thiel et al., 1992). Phosphorylation of the penultimate Thr of the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase is a prerequisite for blue light-induced activation of the H⁺-ATPase (Kinoshita and Shimazaki, 1999, 2002). ABA inhibits H⁺-ATPase activity through dephosphorylation of the penultimate Thr in the C terminus of the H⁺-ATPase in guard cells, resulting in prevention of the opening (Goh et al., 1996; Zhang et al., 2004; Hayashi et al., 2011). Inward-rectifying K⁺ currents (I_Kin) of guard cells are negatively regulated by ABA in addition to through the decline of the H⁺ pump-driven membrane potential difference (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Blatt, 1990; McAinsh et al., 1990; Schwartz et al., 1994; Grabov and Blatt, 1999; Saito et al., 2008). This down-regulation of ion transporters by ABA is essential for the inhibition of stomatal opening.A series of second messengers has been shown to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) produced by NADPH oxidases play a crucial role in ABA signaling in guard cells (Pei et al., 2000; Zhang et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003; Sirichandra et al., 2009; Jannat et al., 2011). Nitric oxide (NO) is an essential signaling component in ABA-induced stomatal closure (Desikan et al., 2002; Guo et al., 2003; Garcia-Mata and Lamattina, 2007; Neill et al., 2008). Alkalization of cytosolic pH in guard cells is postulated to mediate ABA-induced stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) and Pisum sativum and Paphiopedilum species (Irving et al., 1992; Gehring et al., 1997; Grabov and Blatt, 1997; Suhita et al., 2004; Gonugunta et al., 2008). These second messengers transduce environmental signals to ion channels and ion transporters that create the driving force for stomatal movements (Ward et al., 1995; MacRobbie, 1998; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003).In this study, we examined the mobilization of second messengers, the inactivation of I_Kin, and the suppression of H⁺-ATPase phosphorylation evoked by ABA in Arabidopsis mutants to clarify the downstream signaling events of ABA signaling in guard cells. The mutants included a quadruple mutant of PYR/PYL/RCARs, pyr1/pyl1/pyl2/pyl4, and a mutant of a SnRK2 kinase, srk2e.     

Focus Issue on Calcium Signaling: Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase CPK6 Positively Functions in Induction by Yeast Elicitor of Stomatal Closure and Inhibition by Yeast Elicitor of Light-Induced Stomatal Opening in Arabidopsis

Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure that is mediated by a Ca²⁺-dependent signaling pathway. A Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinase, CPK6, positively regulates activation of ion channels in abscisic acid and methyl jasmonate signaling, leading to stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). YEL also inhibits light-induced stomatal opening. However, it remains unknown whether CPK6 is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure or in inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. In this study, we investigated the roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis. Disruption of CPK6 gene impaired induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. Activation by YEL of nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation channels was impaired in cpk6-2 guard cells, and transient elevations elicited by YEL in cytosolic-free Ca²⁺ concentration were suppressed in cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 guard cells. YEL activated slow anion channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1 and inhibited inward-rectifying K⁺ channels in wild-type guard cells but not in cpk6-2 or cpk6-1. The cpk6-2 and cpk6-1 mutations inhibited YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide accumulation in guard cells and apoplast of rosette leaves but did not affect YEL-induced hydrogen peroxide production in the apoplast of rosette leaves. These results suggest that CPK6 positively functions in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening in Arabidopsis and is a convergent point of signaling pathways for stomatal closure in response to abiotic and biotic stress.Stomata, formed by pairs of guard cells, play a critical role in regulation of plant CO₂ uptake and water loss, thus critically influencing plant growth and water stress responsiveness. Guard cells respond to a variety of abiotic and biotic stimuli, such as light, drought, and pathogen attack (Israelsson et al., 2006; Shimazaki et al., 2007; Melotto et al., 2008).Elicitors derived from microbial surface mimic pathogen attack and induce stomatal closure in various plant species such as Solanum lycopersicum (Lee et al., 1999), Commelina communis (Lee et al., 1999), Hordeum vulgare (Koers et al., 2011), and Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Melotto et al., 2006; Khokon et al., 2010). Yeast elicitor (YEL) induces stomatal closure in Arabidopsis (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010; Salam et al., 2013). Our recent studies showed that YEL inhibits light-induced stomatal opening and that protein phosphorylation is involved in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening (Salam et al., 2013).Cytosolic Ca²⁺ has long been recognized as a conserved second messenger in stomatal movement (Shimazaki et al., 2007; Roelfsema and Hedrich 2010; Hubbard et al., 2012). Elevation of cytosolic free Ca²⁺ concentration ([Ca2+]_cyt) is triggered by influx of Ca²⁺ from apoplast and release of Ca²⁺ from intracellular stores in guard cell signaling (Leckie et al., 1998; Hamilton et al., 2000; Pei et al., 2000; Garcia-Mata et al., 2003; Lemtiri-Chlieh et al., 2003). The influx of Ca²⁺ is carried by nonselective Ca²⁺-permeable cation (I_Ca) channels that are activated by plasma membrane hyperpolarization and H₂O₂ (Pei et al., 2000; Murata et al., 2001; Kwak et al., 2003). Elevation of [Ca2+]_cyt activates slow anion (S-type) channels and down-regulates inward-rectifying potassium (K_in) channels in guard cells (Schroeder and Hagiwara, 1989; Grabov and Blatt, 1999). The activation of S-type channels is a hallmark of stomatal closure, and the suppression of K_in channels is favorable to stomatal closure but not to stomatal opening (Pei et al., 1997; Kwak et al., 2001; Xue et al., 2011; Uraji et al., 2012).YEL induces stomatal closure with extracellular H₂O₂ production, intracellular H₂O₂ accumulation, activation of I_Ca channels, and transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations (Klüsener et al., 2002; Khokon et al., 2010). However, it remains to be clarified whether YEL activates S-type channels and inhibits K_in channels in guard cells.Calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) are regulators in Ca²⁺-dependent guard cell signaling (Mori et al., 2006; Zhu et al., 2007; Geiger et al., 2010, 2011; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011; Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). In guard cells, CDPKs regulate activation of S-type and I_Ca channels and inhibition of K_in channels (Mori et al., 2006; Zou et al., 2010; Munemasa et al., 2011). A CDPK, CPK6, positively regulates activation of S-type channels and I_Ca channels without affecting H₂O₂ production in abscisic acid (ABA)- and methyl jasmonate (MeJA)-induced stomatal closure (Mori et al., 2006; Munemasa et al., 2011). CPK6 phosphorylates and activates SLOW ANION CHANNEL-ASSOCIATED1 expressed in Xenopus spp. oocyte (Brandt et al., 2012; Scherzer et al., 2012). These findings underline the role of CPK6 in regulation of ion channel activation and stomatal movement, leading us to test whether CPK6 regulates the induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening.In this study, we investigated activation of S-type channels and inhibition of K_in channels by YEL and roles of CPK6 in induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening. For this purpose, we examined the effects of mutation of CPK6 on induction by YEL of stomatal closure and inhibition by YEL of light-induced stomatal opening, activation of I_Ca channels, transient [Ca2+]_cyt elevations, activation of S-type channels, inhibition of K_in channels, H₂O₂ production in leaves, and H₂O₂ accumulation in leaves and guard cells.     

The Rubisco Small Subunit Is Involved in Tobamovirus Movement and Tm-22-Mediated Extreme Resistance

The multifunctional movement protein (MP) of Tomato mosaic tobamovirus (ToMV) is involved in viral cell-to-cell movement, symptom development, and resistance gene recognition. However, it remains to be elucidated how ToMV MP plays such diverse roles in plants. Here, we show that ToMV MP interacts with the Rubisco small subunit (RbCS) of Nicotiana benthamiana in vitro and in vivo. In susceptible N. benthamiana plants, silencing of NbRbCS enabled ToMV to induce necrosis in inoculated leaves, thus enhancing virus local infectivity. However, the development of systemic viral symptoms was delayed. In transgenic N. benthamiana plants harboring Tobacco mosaic virus resistance-2² (Tm-2²), which mediates extreme resistance to ToMV, silencing of NbRbCS compromised Tm-2²-dependent resistance. ToMV was able to establish efficient local infection but was not able to move systemically. These findings suggest that NbRbCS plays a vital role in tobamovirus movement and plant antiviral defenses.Plant viruses use at least one movement protein (MP) to facilitate viral spread between plant cells via plasmodesmata (PD; Lucas and Gilbertson, 1994; Ghoshroy et al., 1997). Among viral MPs, the MP of tobamoviruses, such as Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) and its close relative Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV), is the best characterized. TMV MP specifically accumulates in PD and modifies the plasmodesmatal size exclusion limit in mature source leaves or tissues (Wolf et al., 1989; Deom et al., 1990; Ding et al., 1992). TMV MP and viral genomic RNA form a mobile ribonucleoprotein complex that is essential for cell-to-cell movement of viral infection (Watanabe et al., 1984; Deom et al., 1987; Citovsky et al., 1990, 1992; Kiselyova et al., 2001; Kawakami et al., 2004; Waigmann et al., 2007). TMV MP also enhances intercellular RNA silencing (Vogler et al., 2008) and affects viral symptom development, host range, and host susceptibility to virus (Dardick et al., 2000; Bazzini et al., 2007). Furthermore, ToMV MP is identified as an avirulence factor that is recognized by tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) resistance proteins Tobacco mosaic virus resistance-2 (Tm-2) and Tm-2² (Meshi et al., 1989; Lanfermeijer et al., 2004). Indeed, tomato Tm-2² confers extreme resistance against TMV and ToMV in tomato plants and even in heterologous tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants (Lanfermeijer et al., 2003, 2004).To date, several host factors that interact with TMV MP have been identified. These TMV MP-binding host factors include cell wall-associated proteins such as pectin methylesterase (Chen et al., 2000), calreticulin (Meshi et al., 1989), ANK1 (Ueki et al., 2010), and the cellular DnaJ-like protein MPIP1 (Shimizu et al., 2009). Many cytoskeletal components such as actin filaments (McLean et al., 1995), microtubules (Heinlein et al., 1995), and the microtubule-associated proteins MPB2C (Kragler et al., 2003) and EB1a (Brandner et al., 2008) also interact with TMV MP. Most of these factors are involved in TMV cell-to-cell movement.Rubisco catalyzes the first step of CO₂ assimilation in photosynthesis and photorespiration. The Rubisco holoenzyme is a heteropolymer consisting of eight large subunits (RbCLs) and eight small subunits (RbCSs). RbCL was reported to interact with the coat protein of Potato virus Y (Feki et al., 2005). Both RbCS and RbCL were reported to interact with the P3 proteins encoded by several potyviruses, including Shallot yellow stripe virus, Onion yellow dwarf virus, Soybean mosaic virus, and Turnip mosaic virus (Lin et al., 2011). Proteomic analysis of the plant-virus interactome revealed that RbCS participates in the formation of virus complexes of Rice yellow mottle virus (Brizard et al., 2006). However, the biological function of Rubisco in viral infection remains unknown.In this study, we show that RbCS plays an essential role in virus movement, host susceptibility, and Tm-2²-mediated extreme resistance in the ToMV-host plant interaction.     

Involvement of the Sieve Element Cytoskeleton in Electrical Responses to Cold Shocks

This study dealt with the visualization of the sieve element (SE) cytoskeleton and its involvement in electrical responses to local cold shocks, exemplifying the role of the cytoskeleton in Ca²⁺-triggered signal cascades in SEs. High-affinity fluorescent phalloidin as well as immunocytochemistry using anti-actin antibodies demonstrated a fully developed parietal actin meshwork in SEs. The involvement of the cytoskeleton in electrical responses and forisome conformation changes as indicators of Ca²⁺ influx was investigated by the application of cold shocks in the presence of diverse actin disruptors (latrunculin A and cytochalasin D). Under control conditions, cold shocks elicited a graded initial voltage transient, ΔV₁, reduced by external La³⁺ in keeping with the involvement of Ca²⁺ channels, and a second voltage transient, ΔV₂. Cytochalasin D had no effect on ΔV₁, while ΔV₁ was significantly reduced with 500 nm latrunculin A. Forisome dispersion was triggered by cold shocks of 4°C or greater, which was indicative of an all-or-none behavior. Forisome dispersion was suppressed by incubation with latrunculin A. In conclusion, the cytoskeleton controls cold shock-induced Ca²⁺ influx into SEs, leading to forisome dispersion and sieve plate occlusion in fava bean (Vicia faba).It has been argued for a long time that sieve elements (SEs) are devoid of a cytoskeleton (Parthasarathy and Pesacreta, 1980; Thorsch and Esau, 1981; Evert, 1990), but more recent biochemical and cytological studies favor the opposite view. Actin as well as profilin were detected in phloem exudates of various monocot and dicot species (Schobert et al., 1998, 2000), while immunocytochemical tests showed the presence of actin and tubulin in phloem exudates of pumpkin (Cucurbita maxima; Kulikova and Puryaseva, 2002). Proteome analyses gave further credence to the occurrence of microfilaments in SEs in castor bean (Ricinus communis; profilin; Barnes et al., 2004), pumpkin (actin; Walz et al., 2004), canola (Brassica napus; actin, profilin1 and profilin2, actin-depolymerizing factor4; Giavalisco et al., 2006), and rice (Oryza sativa; actin1, actin-depolymerizing factor2, actin depolymerizing-factor3, and actin-depolymerizing factor6; Aki et al., 2008). Moreover, cytological evidence suggests residues of a cytoskeleton in SEs; fluorescent immunolabeling identified an actin/myosin system at the sieve plates (Chaffey and Barlow, 2002).Theoretical considerations also call for the presence of a cytoskeleton in SEs. Turnover and addressing of macromolecules (Fisher et al., 1992; Leineweber et al., 2000) requires a local distribution network in SEs. This function was attributed to an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) continuous to the ER strands running through pore plasmodesma units (Blackman et al., 1998) into the companion cells. Although such a mechanism is essentially conceivable, an interaction between the ER and cytoskeleton would provide a more conventional mode of intracellular distribution (Hepler et al., 1990; Boevink et al., 1998; Ueda et al., 2010; Yokota et al., 2011; Chen et al., 2012). Moreover, macromolecular trafficking through pore plasmodesma units (Lucas et al., 2001) was proposed to be executed by actin and myosin (Oparka, 2004), implying the presence of a cytoskeleton in SEs. Despite the massive circumstantial evidence, however, a complete cytoskeleton network and its spatial distribution in SEs have not been visually documented thus far.The existence of an SE cytoskeleton would raise questions regarding its task(s) in this highly specialized cell type. In other plant cells, the cytoskeleton was proposed to be engaged, among others, in ion channel operation and intracellular signaling (Trewavas and Malho, 1997; Mazars et al., 1997, and refs. therein; Thuleau et al., 1998; Örvar et al., 2000; Sangwan et al., 2001; Drøbak et al., 2004; Davies and Stankovic, 2006), as in animal cells (Janmey, 1998; Lange and Gartzke, 2006). For instance, K⁺ fluxes are regulated by actin dynamics (Hwang et al., 1997; Liu and Luan, 1998; Chérel, 2004), while Ca²⁺ influx into the cytoplasm appears to be mediated by voltage-dependent Ca²⁺-permeable channels associated with microtubules (Mazars et al., 1997; Thion et al., 1998) or by mechanosensitive channels possibly associated with microfilaments (Wang et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2007).Both types of Ca²⁺-permeable channels probably reside in the SE plasma membrane (Knoblauch et al., 2001; Hafke et al., 2007, 2009; Furch et al., 2009), where they are likely involved in Ca²⁺-dependent systemic signaling (Furch et al., 2009; Hafke et al., 2009; van Bel et al., 2011; Hafke and van Bel, 2013). These channels are also putative initiators of Ca²⁺-induced signal transduction in SEs, leading to sieve-plate occlusion in response to local cold shocks (Thorpe et al., 2010). In fava bean (Vicia faba), Ca²⁺-dependent sieve tube occlusion by dispersion of special phloem-specific proteins (P-proteins) known as forisomes has been studied intensely (Knoblauch et al., 2001; Furch et al., 2007, 2009; Thorpe et al., 2010). Thus, apart from its distributive tasks, a cytoskeleton may be of major importance for intracellular signaling cascades in the highly specialized, sparsely equipped SEs.Our objective was to investigate the existence and spatial distribution of an SE cytoskeleton and its engagement in local signaling through Ca²⁺ influx brought about by cold shocks. This study dealt with the visualization of cytoskeletal components in intact sieve tubes using microinjection of fluorescent phalloidin and immunocytochemistry. Confocal laser-scanning micrography (CLSM) and transmission electron microscopy unequivocally showed a parietally located cylindrical actin meshwork. We demonstrated the engagement of the network in local cold shock-induced electrical responses and its association with Ca²⁺ influx, since we found effects of the Ca²⁺ channel blocker La³⁺ and of the cytoskeleton disruptor latrunculin A (LatA) on electrical signatures triggered by cold shocks and, by consequence, on forisome conformation changes.     

Heterodimeric Capping Protein from Arabidopsis Is a Membrane-Associated,Actin-Binding Protein

The actin cytoskeleton is a major regulator of cell morphogenesis and responses to biotic and abiotic stimuli. The organization and activities of the cytoskeleton are choreographed by hundreds of accessory proteins. Many actin-binding proteins are thought to be stimulus-response regulators that bind to signaling phospholipids and change their activity upon lipid binding. Whether these proteins associate with and/or are regulated by signaling lipids in plant cells remains poorly understood. Heterodimeric capping protein (CP) is a conserved and ubiquitous regulator of actin dynamics. It binds to the barbed end of filaments with high affinity and modulates filament assembly and disassembly reactions in vitro. Direct interaction of CP with phospholipids, including phosphatidic acid, results in uncapping of filament ends in vitro. Live-cell imaging and reverse-genetic analyses of cp mutants in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) recently provided compelling support for a model in which CP activity is negatively regulated by phosphatidic acid in vivo. Here, we used complementary biochemical, subcellular fractionation, and immunofluorescence microscopy approaches to elucidate CP-membrane association. We found that CP is moderately abundant in Arabidopsis tissues and present in a microsomal membrane fraction. Sucrose density gradient separation and immunoblotting with known compartment markers were used to demonstrate that CP is enriched on membrane-bound organelles such as the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi. This association could facilitate cross talk between the actin cytoskeleton and a wide spectrum of essential cellular functions such as organelle motility and signal transduction.The cellular levels of membrane-associated lipids undergo dynamic changes in response to developmental and environmental stimuli. Different species of phospholipids target specific proteins and this often affects the activity and/or subcellular localization of these lipid-binding proteins. One such membrane lipid, phosphatidic acid (PA), serves as a second messenger and regulates multiple developmental processes in plants, including seedling development, root hair growth and pattern formation, pollen tube growth, leaf senescence, and fruit ripening. PA levels also change during various stress responses, including high salinity and dehydration, pathogen attack, and cold tolerance (Testerink and Munnik, 2005, 2011; Wang, 2005; Li et al., 2009). In mammalian cells, PA is critical for vesicle trafficking events, such as vesicle budding from the Golgi apparatus, vesicle transport, exocytosis, endocytosis, and vesicle fusion (Liscovitch et al., 2000; Freyberg et al., 2003; Jenkins and Frohman, 2005).The actin cytoskeleton and a plethora of actin-binding proteins (ABPs) are well-known targets and transducers of lipid signaling (Drøbak et al., 2004; Saarikangas et al., 2010; Pleskot et al., 2013). For example, several ABPs have the ability to bind phosphoinositide lipids, such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate [PtdIns(4,5)P₂]. The severing or actin filament depolymerizing proteins such as villin, cofilin, and profilin are inhibited when bound to PtdIns(4,5)P₂. One ABP appears to be strongly regulated by another phospholipid; human gelsolin binds to lysophosphatidic acid and its filament severing and barbed-end capping activities are inhibited by this biologically active lipid (Meerschaert et al., 1998). Gelsolin is not, however, regulated by PA (Meerschaert et al., 1998), nor are profilin (Lassing and Lindberg, 1985), α-actinin (Fraley et al., 2003), or chicken CapZ (Schafer et al., 1996).The heterodimeric capping protein (CP) from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) also binds to and its activity is inhibited by phospholipids, including both PtdIns(4,5)P₂ and PA (Huang et al., 2003, 2006). PA and phospholipase D activity have been implicated in the actin-dependent tip growth of root hairs and pollen tubes (Ohashi et al., 2003; Potocký et al., 2003; Samaj et al., 2004; Monteiro et al., 2005a; Pleskot et al., 2010). Exogenous application of PA causes an elevation of actin filament levels in suspension cells, pollen, and Arabidopsis epidermal cells (Lee et al., 2003; Potocký et al., 2003; Huang et al., 2006; Li et al., 2012; Pleskot et al., 2013). Capping protein (CP) binds to the barbed end of actin filaments with high (nanomolar) affinity, dissociates quite slowly, and prevents the addition of actin subunits at this end (Huang et al., 2003, 2006; Kim et al., 2007). In the presence of phospholipids, AtCP is not able to bind to the barbed end of actin filaments (Huang et al., 2003, 2006). Furthermore, capped filament ends are uncapped by the addition of PA, allowing actin assembly from a pool of profilin-actin (Huang et al., 2006). Collectively, these data lead to a simple model whereby CP, working in concert with profilin-actin, serves to maintain tight regulation of actin assembly at filament barbed ends (Huang et al., 2006; Blanchoin et al., 2010; Henty-Ridilla et al., 2013; Pleskot et al., 2013). Furthermore, the availability of CP for filament ends can be modulated by fluxes in signaling lipids. Genetic evidence for this model was recently obtained by analyzing the dynamic behavior of actin filament ends in living Arabidopsis epidermal cells after treatment with exogenous PA (Li et al., 2012). Specifically, changes in the architecture of cortical actin arrays and dynamics of individual actin filaments that are induced by PA treatment were found to be attenuated in cp mutant cells (Li et al., 2012; Pleskot et al., 2013).Structural characterization of chicken CapZ demonstrates that the α- and β-subunits of the heterodimer form a compact structure resembling a mushroom with pseudo-two-fold rotational symmetry (Yamashita et al., 2003). Actin- and phospholipid-binding sites are conserved on the C-terminal regions, sometimes referred to as tentacles, which comprise amphipathic α-helices (Cooper and Sept, 2008; Pleskot et al., 2012). Coarse-grained molecular dynamics (CG-MD) simulations recently revealed the mechanism of chicken and AtCP association with membranes (Pleskot et al., 2012). AtCP interacts specifically with lipid bilayers through interactions between PA and the amphipathic helix of the α-subunit tentacle. Extensive polar contacts between lipid headgroups and basic residues on CP (including K278, which is unique to plant CP), as well as partial embedding of nonpolar groups into the lipid bilayer, are observed (Pleskot et al., 2012). Moreover, a glutathione S-transferase fusion protein containing the C-terminal 38 amino acids from capping protein α subunit (CPA) is sufficient to bind PA-containing liposomes in vitro (Pleskot et al., 2012). Collectively, these findings lead us to predict that AtCP will behave like a membrane-associated protein in plant cells.Additional evidence from animal and microbial cells supports the association of CP with biological membranes. In Acanthamoeba castellanii, CP is localized primarily to the hyaline ectoplasm in a region of the cytoplasm just under the plasma membrane that contains a high concentration of actin filaments (Cooper et al., 1984). Localization of CP with regions rich in actin filaments and with membranes was supported by subcellular fractionation experiments, in which CP was associated with a crude membrane fraction that included plasma membrane (Cooper et al., 1984). Further evidence demonstrates that CP localizes to cortical actin patches at sites of new cell wall growth in budding yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae), including the site of bud emergence. By contrast, CP did not colocalize with actin cables in S. cerevisiae (Amatruda and Cooper, 1992). CP may localize to these sites by direct interactions with membrane lipids, through binding the ends of actin filaments, or by association with another protein different from actin. In support of this hypothesis, GFP-CP fusion proteins demonstrate that sites of actin assembling in living cells contain both CP and the actin-related protein2/3 (Arp2/3) complex, and CP is located in two types of structures: (1) motile regions of the cell periphery, which reflect movement of the edge of the lamella during extension and ruffling; and (2) dynamic spots within the lamella (Schafer et al., 1998). CP has been colocalized to the F-actin patches in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe; Kovar et al., 2005), which promotes Arp2/3-dependent nucleation and branching and limits the extent of filament elongation (Akin and Mullins, 2008). These findings lend additional support for a model whereby CP cooperates with the Arp2/3 complex to regulate actin dynamics (Nakano and Mabuchi, 2006). Activities and localization of other plant ABPs are linked to membranes. Membrane association has been linked to the assembly status of the ARP2/3 complex, an actin filament nucleator, in Arabidopsis (Kotchoni et al., 2009). SPIKE1 (SPK1), a Rho of plants (Rop)-guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) and peripheral membrane protein, maintains the homeostasis of the early secretory pathway and signal integration during morphogenesis through specialized domains in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER; Zhang et al., 2010). Furthermore, Nck-associated protein1 (NAP1), a component of the suppressor of cAMP receptor/WASP-family verprolin homology protein (SCAR/WAVE) complex, strongly associates with membranes and is particularly enriched in ER membranes (Zhang et al., 2013a). Finally, a superfamily of plant ABPs, called NETWORKED proteins, was recently discovered; these link the actin cytoskeleton to various cellular membranes (Deeks et al., 2012; Hawkins et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2014).In this work, we demonstrate that CP is a membrane-associated protein in Arabidopsis. To our knowledge, this is the first direct evidence for CP-membrane association in plants. This interaction likely targets CP to cellular compartments such as the ER and Golgi. This unique location may allow CP to remodel the actin cytoskeleton in the vicinity of endomembrane compartments and/or to respond rapidly to fluxes in signaling lipids.     

Arabidopsis Glutathione Transferases U24 and U25 Exhibit a Range of Detoxification Activities with the Environmental Pollutant and Explosive, 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene

The explosive 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) is a major worldwide military pollutant. The presence of this toxic and highly persistent pollutant, particularly at military sites and former manufacturing facilities, presents various health and environmental concerns. Due to the chemically resistant structure of TNT, it has proven to be highly recalcitrant to biodegradation in the environment. Here, we demonstrate the importance of two glutathione transferases (GSTs), GST-U24 and GST-U25, from Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) that are specifically up-regulated in response to TNT exposure. To assess the role of GST-U24 and GST-U25, we purified and characterized recombinant forms of both enzymes and demonstrated the formation of three TNT glutathionyl products. Importantly, GST-U25 catalyzed the denitration of TNT to form 2-glutathionyl-4,6-dinitrotoluene, a product that is likely to be more amenable to subsequent biodegradation in the environment. Despite the presence of this biochemical detoxification pathway in plants, physiological concentrations of GST-U24 and GST-U25 result in only a limited innate ability to cope with the levels of TNT found at contaminated sites. We demonstrate that Arabidopsis plants overexpressing GST-U24 and GST-U25 exhibit significantly enhanced ability to withstand and detoxify TNT, properties that could be applied for in planta detoxification of TNT in the field. The overexpressing lines removed significantly more TNT from soil and exhibited a corresponding reduction in glutathione levels when compared with wild-type plants. However, in the absence of TNT, overexpression of these GSTs reduces root and shoot biomass, and although glutathione levels are not affected, this effect has implications for xenobiotic detoxification.The containment and cleanup of environmental pollutants is increasingly both a legal requirement and a responsible action in many developed countries. The most commonly used explosives in military weapons are 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT) and hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), and their continual use, along with production and decommissioning, are progressively contaminating millions of hectares of military land (Rylott and Bruce, 2009). Bioremediation of TNT is particularly challenging, as the electron-withdrawing properties of the three nitro groups render the aromatic ring particularly resistant to oxidative attack and ring cleavage by microbial oxygenases, which in the environment are normally central to the biodegradation of aromatic compounds (Qasim et al., 2007). In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency and the military are addressing methods by which toxic TNT and RDX can be contained and detoxified on active military training ranges. One way this problem might be tackled is through the use of plants that are adapted to detoxify these compounds. This could be achieved either by traditional breeding programs or by genetic modification, as has been demonstrated previously for both RDX and TNT (Hannink et al., 2001; Rylott et al., 2006; Jackson et al., 2007).In the majority of species tested so far (tobacco [Nicotiana tabacum], bean [Phaseolus vulgaris], wheat [Triticum aestivum], poplar [Populus spp.], and switchgrass [Panicum virgatum]), with the exception of some conifer trees (Schoenmuth and Pestemer, 2004), TNT is located almost entirely in the roots (Sens et al., 1998, 1999; Hannink et al., 2007; Van Dillewijn et al., 2008; Brentner et al., 2010). Endogenous metabolism of TNT by plants has been characterized (Rylott and Bruce, 2009; Rylott et al., 2011b), with recent research focusing on the model plant species Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Hannink et al., 2001; Van Dillewijn et al., 2008; Rylott et al., 2011a). First, TNT is transformed by nitroreductases to hydroxylamino dinitrotoluenes (HADNTs), with a varying portion further reduced to amino dinitrotoluenes (ADNTs). In Arabidopsis, oxophytodienoate reductases are known to catalyze these steps (Beynon et al., 2009). Plants engineered to express bacterial nitroreductases, which also perform this transformation step, have increased TNT transformation activity and show dramatically enhanced resistance to TNT (Hannink et al., 2001; Rylott et al., 2011a). The additional functionality of HADNTs and ADNTs permits their subsequent conjugation to amino acids, organic acids, and sugars (Bhadra et al., 1999, 2001), and conjugation of HADNT and ADNT isomers to Glc by Arabidopsis glucosyltransferases has been characterized (Gandia-Herrero et al., 2008), with research suggesting that these conjugates are subsequently sequestered within the cell walls (Rylott and Bruce, 2009).Glutathione transferases (GSTs) are a multigene family of proteins known to conjugate glutathione to electrophilic molecules and, in plants, are involved in the detoxification of herbicide xenobiotics (Cummins et al., 2011). Since GSTs have evolved the ability to catalyze glutathione-linked reactions with thousands of different chemical structures, it has been hypothesized that GSTs should play a central role, alongside glucosyltransferases, in the detoxification of TNT (Mezzari et al., 2005; Brentner et al., 2008). Gene expression studies in poplar (Tanaka et al., 2007; Brentner et al., 2008) and Arabidopsis (Ekman et al., 2003; Mezzari et al., 2005; Gandia-Herrero et al., 2008) have identified GSTs up-regulated in response to TNT; however, to date, the biochemical response of GSTs toward TNT has not been investigated. The overexpression of plant GSTs has been shown to increase resistance to a range of stresses, with some τ class GSTs shown to detoxify herbicides via a conjugation activity (Dixon and Edwards, 2010; Cummins et al., 2011). Many Arabidopsis GSTs (in common with some mammalian and other plant GSTs) exhibit a glutathione-dependent peroxide (GPOX) activity (Dixon and Edwards, 2010), catalyzing the reduction of lipid hydroperoxides to the respective monohydroxyalcohols, an activity that confers tolerance to a number of oxidative stresses (Dixon et al., 1998; Dixon and Edwards, 2010). Here, we expressed, purified, and characterized TNT-responsive Arabidopsis GSTs and investigated their contribution toward the detoxification of TNT in Arabidopsis.