Myosin surface loop 4 modulates inhibition of actomyosin 1b ATPase activity by tropomyosin

Structural studies of the class I myosin, MyoE, led to the predictions that loop 4, a surface loop near the actin-binding region that is longer in class I myosins than in other myosin subclasses, might limit binding of myosins I to actin when actin-binding proteins, like tropomyosin, are present, and might account for the exclusion of myosin I from stress fibers. To test these hypotheses, mutant molecules of the related mammalian class I myosin, Myo1b, in which loop 4 was truncated (from an amino acid sequence of RMNGLDES to NGLD) or replaced with the shorter and distinct loop 4 found in Dictyostelium myosin II (GAGEGA), were expressed in vitro and their interaction with actin and with actin-tropomyosin was tested. Saturating amounts of expressed fibroblast tropomyosin-2 resulted in a decrease in the maximum actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activity of wild-type Myo1b but had little or no effect on the actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activity of the two mutants. In motility assays, few actin filaments bound tightly to Myo1b-WT-coated cover slips when tropomyosin-2 was present, whereas actin filaments both bound and were translocated by Myo1b-NGLD or Myo1b-GAGEGA in both the presence and absence of tropomyosin-2. When expressed in mammalian cells, like the wild type, the mutant myosins were largely excluded from tropomyosin-containing actin filaments, indicating that in the cell additional factors besides loop 4 determine targeting of myosins I to specific subpopulations of actin filaments.     

Novel myosins

The traditional view of myosin, drawn from studies of myosins from striated muscles, is that of an elongated two-headed molecule that assembles into filaments. However, biochemical, molecular genetic and genetic studies have uncovered a host of ubiquitous single-headed nonfilamentous myosins known collectively as myosins I. All of the myosins I possess the myosin head domain, the motor portion of muscle myosins they have tail the filament-forming tail domain of muscle myosins they have tail domains that interact variously with membranes, actin and calmodulin. These alternative molecular interactions confer novel motile properties on myosins I, such as the ability to move membranes relative to actin and to move actin relative to actin without having to assemble into filaments. The numerous actin-based movements retained by cells lacking myosin II, the two-headed filamentous form of nonmuscle myosin, may be supported by myosins I.     

The UCS domain protein She4p binds to myosin motor domains and is essential for class I and class V myosin function

BACKGROUND: Myosins are motor proteins involved in processes like cell motility, vesicle transport, or cytokinesis. In a variety of organisms, a novel group of proteins forming the UCS (UNC-45/CRO1/SHE4) domain-containing family are essential for proper myosin function. The Saccharomyces cerevisae UCS domain protein She4p is involved in two myosin-requiring events, endocytosis and mRNA localization. RESULTS: In contrast to UCS domain proteins from other organisms that interact with class II myosins, we demonstrate that She4p associates with yeast class I and class V myosins. She4p binds to motor domains of class V myosin Myo4p and class I myosin Myo5p, and this binding depends on She4p's UCS domain. In vivo, She4p is essential for the function and localization of Myo3p, Myo4p, and Myo5p (but not of Myo2p) and for colocalization of class I myosins with cortical actin patches. In vitro, She4p stimulates binding of Myo5p to filamentous actin. Wild-type She4p, but not a mutant lacking the UCS domain, accumulates in a cap-like structure at the bud tip. This localization requires Myo2p and actin, suggesting a Myo2-dependent mechanism by which She4p is targeted to the bud cap. Localization of She4p is essential for proper positioning and myosin-actin association of cortical Myo5p. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that She4p is a novel myosin motor domain binding protein and operates as a localized regulator of myosin function of class I and likely class V myosins.     

Myosin VI: a structural role in actin organization important for protein and organelle localization and trafficking

Myosin VI is a member of a superfamily of actin-based motors with at least 18 different sub-types or classes. Myosins are best known as proteins that use ATP-hydrolysis-mediated conformational changes to move along actin filaments. Because of this property, some myosins, including myosins I, V, and VI, are thought to be transporters of vesicle or protein cargoes. Myosin VI has been implicated in many seemingly different processes through functional studies in flies, worms and mammals. In several cases, its role is not easily explained by transport along actin. In addition, some of the biochemical and biophysical properties of myosin VI suggest other mechanisms of action. In this review, we summarize recent data that suggest diverse functions for myosin VI and offer an explanation for how myosin VI may function similarly in all of them. We hypothesize that the main function of myosin VI is to bind tightly to actin, stabilizing actin cytoskeletal structures and linking actin structures to membranes and protein complexes.     

Unique sequences and predicted functions of myosins in Tetrahymena thermophila

Myosins are eukaryotic actin-dependent molecular motors that play important roles in many cellular events. The function of each myosin is determined by a variety of functional domains in its tail region. In some major model organisms, the functions and properties of myosins have been investigated based on their amino acid sequences. However, in protists, myosins have been little studied beyond the level of genome sequences. We therefore investigated the mRNA expression levels and amino acid sequences of 13 myosin genes in the ciliate Tetrahymena thermophila. This study is an overview of myosins in T. thermophila, which has no typical myosins, such as class I, II, or V myosins. We showed that all 13 myosins were expressed in vegetative cells. Furthermore, these myosins could be divided into 3 subclasses based on four functional domains in their tail regions. Subclass 1 comprised of 8 myosins has both MyTH4 and FERM domains, and has a potential to function in vesicle transport or anchoring between membrane and actin filaments. Subclass 2 comprised of 4 myosins has RCC1 (regulator of chromosome condensation 1) domains, which are found only in some protists, and may have unconventional features. Subclass 3 is comprised of one myosin, which has a long coiled-coil domain like class II myosin. In addition, phylogenetic analysis on the basis of motor domains showed that T. thermophila myosins are separated into two clusters: one consists of subclasses 1 and 2, and the other consists of subclass 3.     

A kinetic model for the molecular basis of the contractile activity of Acanthamoeba myosins IA and IB

Acanthamoeba myosins IA and IB are single-headed, monomeric molecules consisting of one heavy chain and one light chain. Both have high actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activity, when the heavy chain is phosphorylated, but neither seems to be able to form the bipolar filaments that are generally thought to be required for actomyosin-dependent contractility. In this paper, we show that, at fixed F-actin concentration, the actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activities of myosins IA and IB increase about 5-fold in specific activity in a cooperative manner as the myosin concentration is increased. The myosin concentration range over which this cooperative change occurs depends on the actin concentration. More myosin I is required for the cooperative increase in activity at high concentrations of F-actin. The cooperative increase in specific activity at limiting actin concentrations is caused by a decrease in the KATPase for F-actin. The high and low KATPase states of the myosin have about the same Vmax at infinite actin concentration. Both myosins are completely bound to the F-actin long before the Vmax values are reached. Therefore, much of the actin activation must be the result of interactions between F-actin and actomyosin. These kinetic data can be explained by a model in which the cooperative shift of myosin I from the high KATPase to the low KATPase state results from the cross-linking of actin filaments by myosin I. Cross-linking might occur either through two actin-binding sites on a single molecule or by dimers or oligomers of myosin I induced to form by the interaction of myosin I monomers with the actin filaments. The ability of Acanthamoeba myosins IA and IB to cross-link actin filaments is demonstrated in the accompanying paper (Fujisaki, H., Albanesi, J.P., and Korn, E.D. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 11183-11189).     

Identification and phylogenetic analysis of Drosophila melanogaster myosins

Myosins constitute a superfamily of motor proteins that convert energy from ATP hydrolysis into mechanical movement along the actin filaments. Phylogenetic analysis currently places myosins into 17 classes based on class-specific features of their conserved motor domain. Traditionally, the myosins have been divided into two classes depending on whether they form monomers or dimers. The conventional myosin of muscle and nonmuscle cells forms class II myosins. They are complex molecules of four light chains bound to two heavy chains that form bipolar filaments via interactions between their coiled-coil tails (type II). Class I myosins are smaller monomeric myosins referred to as unconventional myosins. Now, at least 15 other classes of unconventional myosins are known. How many myosins are needed to ensure the proper development and function of eukaryotic organisms? Thus far, three types of myosins were found in budding yeast, six in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans, and at least 12 in human. Here, we report on the identification and classification of Drosophila melanogaster myosins. Analysis of the Drosophila genome sequence identified 13 myosin genes. Phylogenetic analysis based on the sequence comparison of the myosin motor domains, as well as the presence of the class-specific domains, suggests that Drosophila myosins can be divided into nine major classes. Myosins belonging to previously described classes I, II, III, V, VI, and VII are present. Molecular and phylogenetic analysis indicates that the fruitfly genome contains at least five new myosins. Three of them fall into previously described myosin classes I, VII, and XV. Another myosin is a homolog of the mouse and human PDZ-containing myosins, forming the recently defined class XVIII myosins. PDZ domains are named after the postsynaptic density, disc-large, ZO-1 proteins in which they were first described. The fifth myosin shows a unique domain composition and a low homology to any of the existing classes. We propose that this is classified when similar myosins are identified in other species.     

Three-dimensional reconstruction of thin filaments decorated with a Ca2+-regulated myosin

Three-dimensional reconstructions of “barbed” and “blunted” arrowheads (Craig et al., 1980) show that these two forms arise from arrangement of scallop myosin subfragments (S1) that appear about 40 Å longer in the presence of the regulatory light chain than in its absence. A similar difference in apparent length is indicated by images of single myosin subfragments in partially decorated filaments. The extra mass is located at the end of the subfragment furthest from actin, and probably comprises part of the regulatory light chain as well as a segment of the myosin heavy chain. The fact that barbed arrowheads are also formed by myosin subfragments from vertebrate striated and smooth muscles implies that the homologous light chains in these myosins have locations similar to that of the scallop light chain.The scallop light chain probably does not extend into the actin-binding site on the myosin head, and is therefore unlikely to interfere physically with binding. Rather, regulation of actin-myosin interaction by light chains may involve Ca²⁺-dependent changes in the structure of a region near the head-tail junction of myosin.The reconstructions suggest locations for actin and tropomyosin relative to myosin that are similar to those proposed by Taylor & Amos (1981) and are consistent with a revised steric blocking model for regulation by tropomyosin. The identification of actin from these reconstructions is supported by images of partially decorated filaments that display the polarity of the actin helix relative to that of bound myosin subfragments.     

Purification and characterization of a third isoform of myosin I from Acanthamoeba castellanii

A third isoform of myosin I has been isolated from Acanthamoeba and designated myosin IC. Peptide maps and immunoassays indicate that myosin IC is not a modified form of myosin IA, IB, or II. However, myosin IC has most of the distinctive properties of a myosin I. It is a globular protein of native Mr approximately 162,000, apparently composed of a single 130-kDa heavy chain and a pair of 14-kDa light chains. It is soluble in MgATP at low ionic strength, conditions favoring filament assembly by myosin II. Myosin IC has high Ca2+- and (K+,EDTA)-ATPase activities. Its low Mg2+-ATPase activity is stimulated to a maximum rate of 20 s-1 by the addition of F-actin if its heavy chain has been phosphorylated by myosin I heavy chain kinase. The dependence of the Mg2+-ATPase activity of myosin IC on F-actin concentration is triphasic; and, at fixed concentrations of F-action, this activity increases cooperatively as the concentration of myosin IC is increased. These unusual kinetics were first demonstrated for myosins IA and IB and shown to be due to the presence of two actin-binding sites on each heavy chain which enable those myosins I to cross-link actin filaments. Myosin IC is also capable of cross-linking F-actin, which, together with the kinetics of its actin-activated Mg2+-ATPase activity, suggests that it, like myosins IA and IB, possesses two independent actin-binding domains.     

Analysis of the myosins encoded in the recently completed Arabidopsis thaliana genome sequence

Background

Three types of molecular motors play an important role in the organization, dynamics and transport processes associated with the cytoskeleton. The myosin family of molecular motors move cargo on actin filaments, whereas kinesin and dynein motors move cargo along microtubules. These motors have been highly characterized in non-plant systems and information is becoming available about plant motors. The actin cytoskeleton in plants has been shown to be involved in processes such as transportation, signaling, cell division, cytoplasmic streaming and morphogenesis. The role of myosin in these processes has been established in a few cases but many questions remain to be answered about the number, types and roles of myosins in plants.

Results

Using the motor domain of an Arabidopsis myosin we identified 17 myosin sequences in the Arabidopsis genome. Phylogenetic analysis of the Arabidopsis myosins with non-plant and plant myosins revealed that all the Arabidopsis myosins and other plant myosins fall into two groups - class VIII and class XI. These groups contain exclusively plant or algal myosins with no animal or fungal myosins. Exon/intron data suggest that the myosins are highly conserved and that some may be a result of gene duplication.

Conclusions

Plant myosins are unlike myosins from any other organisms except algae. As a percentage of the total gene number, the number of myosins is small overall in Arabidopsis compared with the other sequenced eukaryotic genomes. There are, however, a large number of class XI myosins. The function of each myosin has yet to be determined.     

D-loop of Actin Differently Regulates the Motor Function of Myosins II and V

To gain more information on the manner of actin-myosin interaction, we examined how the motile properties of myosins II and V are affected by the modifications of the DNase I binding loop (D-loop) of actin, performed in two different ways, namely, the proteolytic digestion with subtilisin and the M47A point mutation. In an in vitro motility assay, both modifications significantly decreased the gliding velocity on myosin II-heavy meromyosin due to a weaker generated force but increased it on myosin V. On the other hand, single molecules of myosin V “walked” with the same velocity on both the wild-type and modified actins; however, the run lengths decreased sharply, correlating with a lower affinity of myosin for actin due to the D-loop modifications. The difference between the single-molecule and the ensemble measurements with myosin V indicates that in an in vitro motility assay the non-coordinated multiple myosin V molecules impose internal friction on each other via binding to the same actin filament, which is reduced by the weaker binding to the modified actins. These results show that the D-loop strongly modulates the force generation by myosin II and the processivity of myosin V, presumably affecting actin-myosin interaction in the actomyosin-ADP·P_i state of both myosins.     

Functional adaptation between yeast actin and its cognate myosin motors

We employed budding yeast and skeletal muscle actin to examine the contribution of the actin isoform to myosin motor function. While yeast and muscle actin are highly homologous, they exhibit different charge density at their N termini (a proposed myosin-binding interface). Muscle myosin-II actin-activated ATPase activity is significantly higher with muscle versus yeast actin. Whether this reflects inefficiency in the ability of yeast actin to activate myosin is not known. Here we optimized the isolation of two yeast myosins to assess actin function in a homogenous system. Yeast myosin-II (Myo1p) and myosin-V (Myo2p) accommodate the reduced N-terminal charge density of yeast actin, showing greater activity with yeast over muscle actin. Increasing the number of negative charges at the N terminus of yeast actin from two to four (as in muscle) had little effect on yeast myosin activity, while other substitutions of charged residues at the myosin interface of yeast actin reduced activity. Thus, yeast actin functions most effectively with its native myosins, which in part relies on associations mediated by its outer domain. Compared with yeast myosin-II and myosin-V, muscle myosin-II activity was very sensitive to salt. Collectively, our findings suggest differing degrees of reliance on electrostatic interactions during weak actomyosin binding in yeast versus muscle. Our study also highlights the importance of native actin isoforms when considering the function of myosins.     

Regulation of the actin-activated ATPase of aorta smooth muscle myosin

Phosphorylation of the 20,000-Da light chains, LC20, of vertebrate smooth muscle myosins is thought to be the primary mechanism for regulating the actin-activated ATPase activities of these myosins and consequently smooth muscle contraction. While actin stimulates the MgATPase activities of phosphorylated smooth muscle myosins, it is generally believed that the MgATPase activities of the unphosphorylated myosins are not stimulated by actin. However, under conditions where both unphosphorylated (5% phosphorylated LC20) and phosphorylated calf aorta myosins are mostly filamentous, the maximum rate, Vmax, of the actin-activated ATPase of the unphosphorylated myosin is one-half that of the phosphorylated myosin. While LC20 phosphorylation causes only a modest increase in Vmax, in the presence of tropomyosin, this phosphorylation does cause up to a 10-fold decrease in Kapp, the actin concentration required to achieve 1/2 Vmax. In the presence of low concentrations of tropomyosin/actin, a linear relationship is obtained between the fraction of LC20 phosphorylated and stimulation of the actin-activated ATPase. The relatively high actin-activated ATPase activity of unphosphorylated aorta myosin suggests that other proteins may be involved in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction. In contrast to the results presented here for aorta myosin, it has been reported that actin does not activate the MgATPase activity of unphosphorylated gizzard myosin and that the actin-activated ATPase of gizzard myosin increases more slowly than LC20 phosphorylation.     

Regulation of Dictyostelium myosin I and II

Dictyostelium expresses 12 different myosins, including seven single-headed myosins I and one conventional two-headed myosin II. In this review we focus on the signaling pathways that regulate Dictyostelium myosin I and myosin II. Activation of myosin I is catalyzed by a Cdc42/Rac-stimulated myosin I heavy chain kinase that is a member of the p21-activated kinase (PAK) family. Evidence that myosin I is linked to the Arp2/3 complex suggests that pathways that regulate myosin I may also influence actin filament assembly. Myosin II activity is stimulated by a cGMP-activated myosin light chain kinase and inhibited by myosin heavy chain kinases (MHCKs) that block bipolar filament assembly. Known MHCKs include MHCK A and MHCK B, which have a novel type of kinase catalytic domain joined to a WD repeat domain, and MHC-protein kinase C (PKC), which contains both diacylglycerol kinase and PKC-related protein kinase catalytic domains. A Dictyostelium PAK (PAKa) acts indirectly to promote myosin II filament formation, suggesting that the MHCKs may be indirectly regulated by Rac GTPases.     

Partial deduced sequence of the 110-kD-calmodulin complex of the avian intestinal microvillus shows that this mechanoenzyme is a member of the myosin I family

The actin bundle within each microvillus of the intestinal brush border is laterally tethered to the membrane by bridges composed of the protein complex, 110-kD-calmodulin. Previous studies have shown that avian 110-kD-calmodulin shares many properties with myosins including mechanochemical activity. In the present study, a cDNA molecule encoding 1,000 amino acids of the 110-kD protein has been sequenced, providing direct evidence that this protein is a vertebrate homologue of the tail-less, single-headed myosin I first described in amoeboid cells. The primary structure of the 110-kD protein (or brush border myosin I heavy chain) consists of two domains, an amino-terminal "head" domain and a 35-kD carboxy-terminal "tail" domain. The head domain is homologous to the S1 domain of other known myosins, with highest homology observed between that of Acanthamoeba myosin IB and the S1 domain of the protein encoded by bovine myosin I heavy chain gene (MIHC; Hoshimaru, M., and S. Nakanishi. 1987. J. Biol. Chem. 262:14625- 14632). The carboxy-terminal domain shows no significant homology with any other known myosins except that of the bovine MIHC. This demonstrates that the bovine MIHC gene most probably encodes the heavy chain of bovine brush border myosin I (BBMI). A bacterially expressed fusion protein encoded by the brush border 110-kD cDNA binds calmodulin. Proteolytic removal of the carboxy-terminal domain of the fusion protein results in loss of calmodulin binding activity, a result consistent with previous studies on the domain structure of the 110-kD protein. No hydrophobic sequence is present in the molecule indicating that chicken BBMI heavy chain is probably not an integral membrane protein. Northern blot analysis of various chicken tissue indicates that BBMI heavy chain is preferentially expressed in the intestine.     

How many is enough? exploring the myosin repertoire in the model eukaryoteDictyostelium discoideum

The cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells is a very complex milieu and unraveling how its unique cytoarchitecture is achieved and maintained is a central theme in modern cell biology. It is crucial to understand how organelles and macro-complexes of RNA and/or proteins are transported to and/or maintained at their specific cellular locations. The importance of filamentous-actindirected myosin-powered cargo transport was only recently realized, and after an initial explosion in the identification of new molecules, the field is now concentrating on their functional dissection. Direct connections of myosins to a variety of cellular tasks are now slowly emerging, such as in cytokinesis, phagocytosis, endocytosis, polarized secretion and exocytosis, axonal transport, etc. Unconventional myosins have been identified in a wide variety of organisms, making the presence of actin and myosins a hallmark of eukaryotism. The genome ofS. cerevisiae encodes only five myosins, whereas a mammalian cell has the capacity to express between two and three dozen myosins. Why is it so crucial to arrive at this final census? The main questions that we would like to discuss are the following. How many distinct myosin-powered functions are carried out in a typical higher eukaryote? Or, in other words, what is the minimal set of myosins essential to accomplish the multitude of tasks related to motility and intracellular dynamics in a multicellular organism? And also, as a corollary, what is the degree of functional redundancy inside a given myosin class? In that respect, the choice of a model organism suitable for such an investigation is more crucial than ever. Here we argue thatDictyostelium discoideum is affirming its position as an ideal system of intermediate complexity to study myosin-powered trafficking and is or will soon become the second eukaryote for which complete knowledge of the whole repertoire of myosins is available.     

The structural basis for the large powerstroke of myosin VI

Due to a unique addition to the lever arm-positioning region (converter), class VI myosins move in the opposite direction (toward the minus-end of actin filaments) compared to other characterized myosin classes. However, the large size of the myosin VI lever arm swing (powerstroke) cannot be explained by our current view of the structural transitions that occur within the myosin motor. We have solved the crystal structure of a fragment of the myosin VI motor in the structural state that represents the starting point for movement on actin; the pre-powerstroke state. Unexpectedly, the converter itself rearranges to achieve a conformation that has not been seen for other myosins. This results in a much larger powerstroke than is achievable without the converter rearrangement. Moreover, it provides a new mechanism that could be exploited to increase the powerstroke of yet to be characterized plus-end-directed myosin classes.     

Unphosphorylated calf thymus and aorta myosins contract ghost myofibrils

The MgATPase activity of unphosphorylated gizzard myosin is not stimulated by actin, but the MgATPase activities of unphosphorylated calf thymus and calf aorta myosins are stimulated by actin. This suggested that unphosphorylated thymus and aorta myosins, but not unphosphorylated gizzard myosin, should be able to cause movement. The contractile activities of these myosins were examined using "ghost" myofibrils, skeletal muscle myofibrils which have been depleted of myosin. Ghost myofibrils were reconstituted with unphosphorylated and phosphorylated turkey gizzard, calf aorta, and calf thymus myosins. While ghost myofibrils reconstituted with unphosphorylated gizzard myosin did not contract, those reconstituted with unphosphorylated thymus and aorta myosins did contract. All three phosphorylated myosins supported contraction.     

Shaking the myosin family tree: biochemical kinetics defines four types of myosin motor

Although all myosin motors follow the same basic cross-bridge cycle, they display a large variety in the rates of transition between different states in the cycle, allowing each myosin to be finely tuned for a specific task. Traditionally, myosins have been classified by sequence analysis into a large number of sub-families (∼35). Here we use a different method to classify the myosin family members which is based on biochemical and mechanical properties. The key properties that define the type of mechanical activity of the motor are duty ratio (defined as the fraction of the time myosin remains attached to actin during each cycle), thermodynamic coupling of actin and nucleotide binding to myosin and the degree of strain-sensitivity of the ADP release step. Based on these properties we propose to classify myosins into four different groups: (I) fast movers, (II) slow/efficient force holders, (III) strain sensors and (IV) gates.