Binding between a distal C-terminus fragment of cannabinoid receptor 1 and arrestin-2

Internalization of G-protein-coupled receptors is mediated by phosphorylation of the C-terminus, followed by binding with the cytosolic protein arrestin. To explore structural factors that may play a role in internalization of cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1), we utilize a phosphorylated peptide derived from the distal C-terminus of CB1 (CB1(5P)(454-473)). Complexes formed between the peptide and human arrestin-2 (wt-arr2(1-418)) were compared to those formed with a truncated arrestin-2 mutant (tr-arr2(1-382)) using isothermal titration calorimetry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The pentaphosphopeptide CB1(5P)(454-473) adopts a helix-loop conformation, whether binding to full-length arrestin-2 or its truncated mutant. This structure is similar to that of a heptaphosphopeptide, mimicking the distal segment of the rhodopsin C-tail (Rh(7P)(330-348)), binding to visual arrestin, suggesting that this adopted structure bears functional significance. Isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiments show that the CB1(5P)(454-473) peptide binds to tr-arr2(1-382) with higher affinity than to the full-length wt-arr2(1-418). As the observed structure of the bound peptides is similar in either case, we attribute the increased affinity to a more exposed binding site on the N-domain of the truncated arrestin construct. The transferred NOE data from the bound phosphopeptides are used to predict a model describing the interaction with arrestin, using the data driven HADDOCK docking program. The truncation of arrestin-2 provides scope for positively charged residues in the polar core of the protein to interact with phosphates present in the loop of the CB1(5P)(454-473) peptide.     

The arrestin-bound conformation and dynamics of the phosphorylated carboxy-terminal region of rhodopsin

Visual arrestin binds to the phosphorylated carboxy-terminal region of rhodopsin to block interactions with transducin and terminate signaling in the rod photoreceptor cells. A synthetic seven-phospho-peptide from the C-terminal region of rhodopsin, Rh(330-348), has been shown to bind arrestin and mimic inhibition of signal transduction. In this study, we examine conformational changes in this synthetic peptide upon binding to arrestin by high-resolution proton nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). We show that the peptide is completely disordered in solution, but becomes structured upon binding to arrestin. A control, unphosphorylated peptide that fails to bind to arrestin remains highly disordered. Specific NMR distance constraints are used to model the arrestin-bound conformation. The models suggest that the phosphorylated carboxy-terminal region of rhodopsin, Rh(330-348), undergoes significant conformational changes and becomes structured upon binding to arrestin.     

Arrestin variants display differential binding characteristics for the phosphorylated N-formyl peptide receptor carboxyl terminus.

The phosphorylation-dependent binding of arrestins to cytoplasmic domains of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is thought to be a crucial step in receptor desensitization. In some GPCR systems, arrestins have also been demonstrated to be involved in receptor internalization, resensitization, and the activation of signaling cascades. The objective of the current study was to examine binding interactions of members of the arrestin family with the formyl peptide receptor (FPR), a member of the GPCR family of receptors. Peptides representing the unphosphorylated and phosphorylated carboxyl terminus of the FPR were synthesized and bound to polystyrene beads via a biotin/streptavidin interaction. Using fluorescein-conjugated arrestins, binding interactions between arrestins and the bead-bound FPR carboxyl terminus were analyzed by flow cytometry. Arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 bound to the FPR carboxyl-terminal peptide in a phosphorylation-dependent manner, with K(d) values in the micromolar range. Binding of visual arrestin, which binds rhodopsin with high selectivity, was not observed. Arrestin-2-(1--382) and arrestin-3-(1--393), truncated mutant forms of arrestin that display phosphorylation-independent binding to intact receptors, were also observed to bind the bead-bound FPR terminus in a phosphorylation-dependent manner, but with much greater affinity than the full-length arrestins, yielding K(d) values in the 5--50 nm range. Two additional arrestin mutants, which are full-length but display phosphorylation-independent binding to intact GPCRs, were evaluated for their binding affinity to the FPR carboxyl terminus. Whereas the single point mutant, arrestin-2 R169E, displayed an affinity similar to that of the full-length arrestins, the triple point mutant, arrestin-2 I386A/V387A/F388A, displayed an affinity more similar to that of the truncated forms of arrestin. The results suggest that the carboxyl terminus of arrestin is a critical determinant in regulating the binding affinity of arrestin for the phosphorylated domains of GPCRs.     

N-formyl peptide receptor phosphorylation domains differentially regulate arrestin and agonist affinity

Arrestins regulate the signaling and endocytosis of many G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). It has been suggested that the functions of arrestins are dependent upon both the number and pattern of phosphorylation sites present in an activated GPCR. However, little is currently known about the relationships between the sites of receptor phosphorylation, the resulting affinities of arrestin binding, and the ensuing mechanisms of receptor regulation for any given GPCR. To investigate these interactions, we used an active truncated mutant of arrestin (amino acids 1-382) and phosphorylation-deficient mutants of the N-formyl peptide receptor (FPR). In contrast to results with wild type arrestins, the truncated arrestin-2 protein bound to the unphosphorylated wild type FPR, although with lower affinity and a low affinity for the agonist as revealed by competition studies with heterotrimeric G proteins. Using FPR mutants, we further demonstrated that the phosphorylation status of serines and threonines between residues 328-332 is a key determinant that regulates the affinity of the FPR for arrestins. Furthermore, we found that the phosphorylation status of serine and threonine residues between amino acids 334 and 339 regulates the affinity of the receptor for agonist when arrestin is bound. These results suggest that the agonist affinity state of the receptor is principally regulated by phosphorylation at specific sites and is not simply a consequence of arrestin binding as has previously been proposed. Furthermore, this is the first demonstration that agonist affinity of a GPCR and the affinity of arrestin binding to the phosphorylated receptor are regulated by distinct receptor phosphodomains.     

Aspartic acid 564 in the third cytoplasmic loop of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor is crucial for phosphorylation-independent interaction with arrestin2

Arrestin2 binding to the active but unphosphorylated luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor (LH/CG R) in ovarian follicles is triggered by activation of ADP-ribosylation factor 6 (ARF6) and leads to uncoupling of this receptor from cAMP signaling. We sought to determine how arrestin2 binds to LH/CG R, if binding is of high affinity, and if the receptor also binds arrestin3. Desensitization of intact LH/CG R was equally sensitive to ectopic constructs of arrestin2 that bind other G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) either in a phosphorylation-independent or -dependent manner. Intact LH/CG R was not desensitized by ectopic arrestin3 constructs. Surface plasmon resonance studies showed that arrestin2 bound a synthetic third intracellular (3i) LH/CG R loop peptide with picomolar affinity; arrestin3 bound with millimolar affinity. To determine whether Asp-564 in the 3i loop mimicked the phosphorylated residue of other GPCRs, human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells were transfected with wild-type (WT) and D564G LH/CG R. An agonist-stimulated ARF6-dependent arrestin2 undocking pathway to drive desensitization of WT receptor was recapitulated in HEK cell membranes, and ectopic arrestin2 promoted desensitization of WT LH/CG R. However, D564G LH/CG R in HEK cells was not desensitized, and synthetic 3i D564G peptide did not bind arrestin2. Synthetic 3i loop peptides containing D564E, D564V, or D564N also did not bind arrestin2. We conclude that the ARF6-mediated mechanism to release a pool of membrane-delimited arrestin to bind GPCRs may be a widespread mechanism to deliver arrestin to GPCRs for receptor desensitization. Unlike other GPCRs that additionally require receptor phosphorylation, LH/CG R activation is sufficient to expose a conformation in which Asp-564 in the 3i loop confers high affinity binding selectively to arrestin2.     

Dopamine D1 receptor interaction with arrestin3 in neostriatal neurons

Dopamine D1 receptor interactions with arrestins have been characterized using heterologously expressed D1 receptor and arrestins. The purpose of this study was to investigate the interaction of the endogenous D1 receptor with endogenous arrestin2 and 3 in neostriatal neurons. Endogenous arrestin2 and 3 in striatal homogenates bound to the C-terminus of the D1 receptor in a glutathione-S-transferase (GST) pulldown assay, with arrestin3 binding more strongly. The D1 C-terminus and, to a lesser extent, the third cytoplasmic loop also bound purified arrestin2 and 3. In neostriatal neurons, 2, 5, and 20 min agonist treatment increased the colocalization of the D1 receptor and arrestin3 immunoreactivity without altering the colocalization of the D1 receptor and arrestin2. Further, agonist treatment for 5 and 20 min caused translocation of arrestin3, but not arrestin2, to the membrane. The binding of arrestin3, but not arrestin2, to the D1 receptor was increased as assessed by coimmunoprecipitation after agonist treatment for 5 and 20 min. Agonist treatment of neurons induced D1 receptor internalization (35-45%) that was maximal within 2-5 min, a time-course similar to that of the increase in colocalization of the D1 receptor with arrestin3. These data indicate that the D1 receptor preferentially interacts with arrestin3 in neostriatal neurons.     

Binding of inositol phosphates to arrestin.

Arrestin binds to phosphorylated rhodopsin in its light-activated form (metarhodopsin II), blocking thereby its interaction with the G-protein, transducin. In this study, we show that highly phosphorylated forms of inositol compete against the arrestin-rhodopsin interaction. Competition curves and direct binding assays with free arrestin consistently yield affinities in the micromolar range; for example, inositol 1,3,4,5-tetrakisphosphate (InP4) and inositol hexakisphosphate (InP6 bind to arrestin with dissociation constants of 12 microM and 5 microM, respectively. Only a small control amount of inositol phosphates is bound, when arrestin interacts with phosphorylated rhodopsin. This argues for a release of bound inositol phosphates by interaction with rhodopsin. Transducin, rhodopsin kinase, or cyclic GMP phosphodiesterase are not affected by inositol phosphates. These observations open a new way to purify arrestin and to inhibit its interaction with rhodopsin. Their physiological significance deserves further investigation.     

Phosphorylated rhodopsin and heparin induce similar conformational changes in arrestin

Photoactivated rhodopsin is quenched upon its phosphorylation in the reaction catalyzed by rhodopsin kinase and the subsequent binding of a regulatory protein, arrestin. We have found that heparin and other polyanions compete with photoactivated, phosphorylated rhodopsin to bind arrestin (48-kDa protein, S-antigen). This is shown (a) by the suppression of stabilized metarhodopsin II; (b) by changes in the digestion of arrestin in the presence of heparin; and (c) by the restoration of arrestin-quenched phosphodiesterase activity. When bound to arrestin, heparin also mimics phosphorylated rhodopsin by similarly exposing arrestin to limited proteolysis. We conclude that heparin and rhodopsin have similar means of binding to arrestin, and we propose a cationic region of arrestin (beginning with Lys163 of the bovine sequence) as the interaction site. In agreement with previous kinetic data we interpret the results in terms of a binding conformation of arrestin which is stabilized by rhodopsin or heparin and is open to proteolytic attack.     

Cellular and viral peptides bind multiple sites on the N‐terminal domain of clathrin

Short peptide motifs in unstructured regions of clathrin‐adaptor proteins recruit clathrin to membranes to facilitate post‐Golgi membrane transport. Three consensus clathrin‐binding peptide sequences have been identified and structural studies show that each binds distinct sites on the clathrin heavy chain N‐terminal domain (NTD). A fourth binding site for adaptors on NTD has been functionally identified but not structurally characterised. We have solved high resolution structures of NTD bound to peptide motifs from the cellular clathrin adaptors β2 adaptin and amphiphysin plus a putative viral clathrin adaptor, hepatitis D virus large antigen (HDAg‐L). Surprisingly, with each peptide we observe simultaneous peptide binding at multiple sites on NTD and viral peptides binding to the same sites as cellular peptides. Peptides containing clathrin‐box motifs (CBMs) with the consensus sequence LΦxΦ[DE] bind at the ‘arrestin box’ on NTD, between β‐propeller blades 4 and 5, which had previously been thought to bind a distinct consensus sequence. Further, we structurally define the fourth peptide binding site on NTD, which we term the Royle box. In vitro binding assays show that clathrin is more readily captured by cellular CBMs than by HDAg‐L, and site‐directed mutagenesis confirms that multiple binding sites on NTD contribute to efficient capture by CBM peptides.      

The interaction with the cytoplasmic loops of rhodopsin plays a crucial role in arrestin activation and binding

The binding of arrestin to rhodopsin is initiated by the interaction of arrestin with the phosphorylated rhodopsin C-terminus and/or the cytoplasmic loops, followed by conformational changes that expose an additional high-affinity site on arrestin. Here we use an arrestin mutant (R175E) that binds similarly to phosphorylated and unphosphorylated, wild-type rhodopsin to identify rhodopsin elements other than C-terminus important for arrestin interaction. R175E-arrestin demonstrated greatly reduced binding to unphosphorylated cytoplasmic loop mutants L72A, N73A, P142A and M143A, suggesting that these residues are crucial for high-affinity binding. Interestingly, when these rhodopsin mutants are phosphorylated, R175E-arrestin binding is less severely affected. This effect of phosphorylation on R175E-arrestin binding highlights the co-operative nature of the multi-site interaction between arrestin and the cytoplasmic loops and C-terminus of rhodopsin. However, a combination of any two mutations disrupts the ability of phosphorylation to enhance binding of R175E-arrestin. N73A, P142A and M143A exhibited accelerated rates of dissociation from wild-type arrestin. Using sensitivity to calpain II as an assay, these cytoplasmic loop mutants also demonstrated reduced ability to induce conformational changes in arrestin that correlated with their reduced ability to bind arrestin. These results suggest that arrestin bound to rhodopsin is in a distinct conformation that is co-ordinately regulated by association with the cytoplasmic loops and the C-terminus of rhodopsin.     

Arrestin 3 mediates endocytosis of CCR7 following ligation of CCL19 but not CCL21

Internalization of ligand bound G protein-coupled receptors, an important cellular function that mediates receptor desensitization, takes place via distinct pathways, which are often unique for each receptor. The C-C chemokine receptor (CCR7) G protein-coupled receptor is expressed on naive T cells, dendritic cells, and NK cells and has two endogenous ligands, CCL19 and CCL21. Following binding of CCL21, 21 +/- 4% of CCR7 is internalized in the HuT 78 human T cell lymphoma line, while 76 +/- 8% of CCR7 is internalized upon binding to CCL19. To determine whether arrestins mediated differential internalization of CCR7/CCL19 vs CCR7/CCL21, we used small interfering RNA (siRNA) to knock down expression of arrestin 2 or arrestin 3 in HuT 78 cells. Independent of arrestin 2 or arrestin 3 expression, CCR7/CCL21 internalized. In contrast, following depletion of arrestin 3, CCR7/CCL19 failed to internalize. To examine the consequence of complete loss of both arrestin 2 and arrestin 3 on CCL19/CCR7 internalization, we examined CCR7 internalization in arrestin 2(-/-)/arrestin 3(-/-) murine embryonic fibroblasts. Only reconstitution with arrestin 3-GFP but not arrestin 2-GFP rescued internalization of CCR7/CCL19. Loss of arrestin 2 or arrestin 3 blocked migration to CCL19 but had no effect on migration to CCL21. Using immunofluorescence microscopy, we found that arrestins do not cluster at the membrane with CCR7 following ligand binding but cap with CCR7 during receptor internalization. These are the first studies that define a role for arrestin 3 in the internalization of a chemokine receptor following binding of one but not both endogenous ligands.     

Phosphorylation-independent Suppression of Light-activated Visual Pigment by Arrestin in Carp Rods and Cones

Visual pigment in photoreceptors is activated by light. Activated visual pigment (R*) is believed to be inactivated by phosphorylation of R* with subsequent binding of arrestin. There are two types of photoreceptors, rods and cones, in the vertebrate retina, and they express different subtypes of arrestin, rod and cone type. To understand the difference in the function between rod- and cone-type arrestin, we first identified the subtype of arrestins expressed in rods and cones in carp retina. We found that two rod-type arrestins, rArr1 and rArr2, are co-expressed in a rod and that a cone-type arrestin, cArr1, is expressed in blue- and UV-sensitive cones; the other cone-type arrestin, cArr2, is expressed in red- and green-sensitive cones. We quantified each arrestin subtype and estimated its concentration in the outer segment of a rod or a cone in the dark; they were ∼0.25 mm (rArr1 plus rArr2) in a rod and 0.6–0.8 mm (cArr1 or cArr2) in a cone. The effect of each arrestin was examined. In contrast to previous studies, both rod and cone arrestins suppressed the activation of transducin in the absence of visual pigment phosphorylation, and all of the arrestins examined (rArr1, rArr2, and cArr2) bound transiently to most probably nonphosphorylated R*. One rod arrestin, rArr2, bound firmly to phosphorylated pigment, and the other two, rArr1 and cArr2, once bound to phosphorylated R* but dissociated from it during incubation. Our results suggested a novel mechanism of arrestin effect on the suppression of the R* activity in both rods and cones.     

Sulfhydryl reactivity demonstrates different conformational states for arrestin, arrestin activated by a synthetic phosphopeptide, and constitutively active arrestin.

The sulfhydryl groups of the three cysteines in bovine arrestin react with DTNB very slowly (over a period of several hours). In the presence of the synthetic phosphopeptide comprising the fully phosphorylated carboxyl-terminal 19 amino acids of bovine rhodopsin, the reactivity of one of the sulfhydryls was enhanced while that of another was greatly reduced. Since this synthetic peptide was shown to activate arrestin with respect to its binding to unphosphorylated, light-activated rhodopsin, the reactivity of the sulfhydryl groups of a constitutively active R175Q arrestin mutant was examined. All three of the sulfhydryl groups of the mutant arrestin R175Q reacted rapidly with DTNB, but not as rapidly as with SDS-denatured arrestin. The arrestin mutant R175Q bound to light-activated, unphosphorylated rhodopsin in ROS disk membranes. The arrestin mutant R175Q also inhibited the light-activated PDE activity with an IC50 of 1.3 microM under the experimental conditions that were used. These data indicate that each of these forms of arrestin is a different conformation. The activated conformation of arrestin that binds to phosphorylated rhodopsin in vivo may be yet another conformation. We conclude that arrestin is a flexible molecule that is able to attain several different conformations, all of which are able to attain the activated functional state of arrestin.     

Identification of regions of arrestin that bind to rhodopsin

Arrestin facilitates phototransduction inactivation through binding to photoactivated and phosphorylated rhodopsin (RP). However, the specific portions of arrestin that bind to RP are not known. In this study, two different approaches were used to determine the regions of arrestin that bind to rhodopsin: panning of phage-displayed arrestin fragments against RP and cGMP phosphodiesterase (PDE) activity inhibition using synthetic arrestin peptides spanning the entire arrestin protein. Phage display indicated the predominant region of binding was contained within amino acids 90-140. A portion of this region (residues 95-140) expressed as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase is capable of binding to rhodopsin regardless of the activation or phosphorylation state of the receptor. Within this region, the synthetic peptide of residues 109-130 was shown to completely inhibit the binding of arrestin to rhodopsin with an IC50 of 1.1 mM. The relatively high IC50 of this competition suggests that this portion of the molecule may be only one of several regions of binding between arrestin and RP. A survey of synthetic arrestin peptides in the PDE assay indicated that the two most effective inhibitors of PDE activity were peptides of residues 111-130 and 101-120. These results indicate that at least one of the principal regions of binding between arrestin and RP is contained within the region of residues 109-130.     

Ubiquitin ligase parkin promotes Mdm2-arrestin interaction but inhibits arrestin ubiquitination

Numerous mutations in E3 ubiquitin ligase parkin were shown to associate with familial Parkinson's disease. Here we show that parkin binds arrestins, versatile regulators of cell signaling. Arrestin-parkin interaction was demonstrated by coimmunoprecipitation of endogenous proteins from brain tissue and shown to be direct using purified proteins. Parkin binding enhances arrestin interactions with another E3 ubiquitin ligase, Mdm2, apparently by shifting arrestin conformational equilibrium to the basal state preferred by Mdm2. Although Mdm2 was reported to ubiquitinate arrestins, parkin-dependent increase in Mdm2 binding dramatically reduces the ubiquitination of both nonvisual arrestins, basal and stimulated by receptor activation, without affecting receptor internalization. Several disease-associated parkin mutations differentially affect the stimulation of Mdm2 binding. All parkin mutants tested effectively suppress arrestin ubiquitination, suggesting that bound parkin shields arrestin lysines targeted by Mdm2. Parkin binding to arrestins along with its effects on arrestin interaction with Mdm2 and ubiquitination is a novel function of this protein with implications for Parkinson's disease pathology.     

Role of the carboxyl-terminal region of arrestin in binding to phosphorylated rhodopsin.

The structural and functional properties of arrestin were studied by subjecting the protein to limited proteolysis. Limited proteolysis by trypsin cleaves arrestin (48 kDa), producing 20-25-kDa fragments. Prior to this stage of proteolysis, trypsin produced 46.6-, 45.4-, and 42-kDa fragments. Structural analysis of the proteolytic fragments demonstrated major cleavage at the carboxyl terminus, indicating that the carboxyl terminus is highly exposed. We found that forms of arrestin truncated at their carboxyl terminus maintained their functional properties and bound to phosphorylated rhodopsin. Native arrestin binds only to photoexcited phosphorylated rhodopsin, whereas the truncated arrestin binds to phosphorylated rhodopsin independent of its exposure to light. The truncated forms of arrestin were separated from native arrestin by a chromatographic procedure and subsequently characterized in functional studies. The binding of the truncated forms of arrestin to phosphorylated photoexcited rhodopsin is more tight than the binding of native arrestin as determined by a direct binding assay and the phosphodiesterase assay. We suggest that the acidic carboxyl-terminal region of arrestin may act as a regulator for light-dependent binding to phosphorylated rhodopsin.     

Differential affinities of visual arrestin, beta arrestin1, and beta arrestin2 for G protein-coupled receptors delineate two major classes of receptors

Visual arrestin, betaarrestin1, and betaarrestin2 comprise a family of intracellular proteins that desensitize G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In addition, betaarrestin1 and betaarrestin2 target desensitized receptors to clathrin-coated pits for endocytosis. Whether arrestins differ in their ability to interact with GPCRs in cells is not known. In this study, we visualize the interaction of arrestin family members with GPCRs in real time and in live cells using green fluorescent protein-tagged arrestins. In the absence of agonist, visual arrestin and betaarrestin1 were found in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of HEK-293 cells, whereas betaarrestin2 was found only in the cytoplasm. Analysis of agonist-mediated arrestin translocation to multiple GPCRs identified two major classes of receptors. Class A receptors (beta2 adrenergic receptor, mu opioid receptor, endothelin type A receptor, dopamine D1A receptor, and alpha1b adrenergic receptor) bound betaarrestin2 with higher affinity than betaarrestin1 and did not interact with visual arrestin. In contrast, class B receptors (angiotensin II type 1A receptor, neurotensin receptor 1, vasopressin V2 receptor, thyrotropin-releasing hormone receptor, and substance P receptor) bound both betaarrestin isoforms with similar high affinities and also interacted with visual arrestin. Switching the carboxyl-terminal tails of class A and class B receptors completely reversed the affinity of each receptor for the visual and non-visual arrestins. In addition, exchanging the betaarrestin1 and betaarrestin2 carboxyl termini reversed their extent of binding to class A receptors as well as their subcellular distribution. These results reveal for the first time marked differences in the ability of arrestin family members to bind GPCRs at the plasma membrane. Moreover, they show that visual arrestin can interact in cells with GPCRs other than rhodopsin. These findings suggest that GPCR signaling may be differentially regulated depending on the cellular complement of arrestin isoforms and the ability of arrestins to interact with other cellular proteins.     

Dynamics of arrestin-rhodopsin interactions: acidic phospholipids enable binding of arrestin to purified rhodopsin in detergent

We report that acidic phospholipids can restore the binding of visual arrestin to purified rhodopsin solubilized in n-dodecyl-beta-d-maltopyranoside. We used this finding to investigate the interplay between arrestin binding and the status of the retinal chromophore ligand in the receptor binding pocket. Our results showed that arrestin can interact with the late photoproduct Meta III and convert it to a Meta II-like species. Interestingly in these mixed micelles, the release of retinal and arrestin was no longer directly coupled as it is in the native rod disk membrane. For example, up to approximately 50% of the retinal could be released even though arrestin remains bound to the receptor in a long lived complex. We anticipate that this new ability to study these proteins in a defined, purified system will facilitate further structural and dynamic studies of arrestin-rhodopsin interactions.     

Mapping the arrestin-receptor interface. Structural elements responsible for receptor specificity of arrestin proteins

Arrestins selectively bind to phosphorylated activated forms of their cognate G protein-coupled receptors. Arrestin binding prevents further G protein activation and often redirects signaling to other pathways. The comparison of the high-resolution crystal structures of arrestin2, visual arrestin, and rhodopsin as well as earlier mutagenesis and peptide inhibition data collectively suggest that the elements on the concave sides of both arrestin domains most likely participate in receptor binding directly, thereby dictating its receptor preference. Using comparative binding of visual arrestin/arrestin2 chimeras to the preferred target of visual arrestin, light-activated phosphorylated rhodopsin (PRh*), and to the arrestin2 target, phosphorylated activated m2 muscarinic receptor (P-m2 mAChR*), we identified the elements that determine the receptor specificity of arrestins. We found that residues 49-90 (beta-strands V and VI and adjacent loops in the N-domain) and 237-268 (beta-strands XV and XVI in the C-domain) in visual arrestin and homologous regions in arrestin2 are largely responsible for their receptor preference. Only 35 amino acids (22 of which are nonconservative substitutions) in the two elements are different. Simultaneous exchange of both elements between visual arrestin and arrestin2 fully reverses their receptor specificity, demonstrating that these two elements in the two domains of arrestin are necessary and sufficient to determine their preferred receptor targets.     

Phosphorylation uncouples the gastrin-releasing peptide receptor from G(q)

Previous work on the desensitization of G protein-coupled receptors has focused on the role of arrestin binding following receptor phosphorylation. We have examined the hypothesis that phosphorylation alone contributes to desensitization. In this study we demonstrate that for the G(q)-coupled gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRP-R), phosphorylation by GRK2 to a stoichiometry of approximately 1 mol PO(4)/mol GRP-R is sufficient in the absence of arrestin to reduce the rate of receptor catalyzed G protein activation by approximately 80%. Furthermore, GRP-Rs exposed in vivo to agonist are rapidly phosphorylated to a similar stoichiometry and are desensitized to a similar degree. Finally, the molecular mechanism for both in vitro GRK2-induced and in vivo agonist-induced desensitization is primarily a decrease in the maximum velocity (V(max)) for the catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange by the GRP-R rather than a change in the affinity of the receptor for the alpha(q) or betagamma subunits. Based on these results, we suggest that, for some G protein-coupled receptors, phosphorylation has a role in desensitization that is independent of arrestin.