The channel domain of colicin A is inhibited by its immunity protein through direct interaction in the Escherichia coli inner membrane.

A bacterial signal sequence was fused to the colicin A pore-forming domain: the exported pore-forming domain was highly cytotoxic. We thus introduced a cysteine-residue pair in the fusion protein which has been shown to form a disulfide bond in the natural colicin A pore-forming domain between alpha-helices 5 and 6. Formation of the disulfide bond prevented the cytotoxic activity of the fusion protein, presumably by preventing the membrane insertion of helices 5 and 6. However, the cytotoxicity of the disulfide-linked pore-forming domain was reactivated by adding dithiothreitol into the culture medium. We were then able to co-produce the immunity protein with the disulfide linked pore-forming domain, by using a co-immunoprecipitation procedure, in order to show that they interact. We showed both proteins to be co-localized in the Escherichia coli inner membrane and subsequently co-immunoprecipitated them. The interaction required a functional immunity protein. The immunity protein also interacted with a mutant form of the pore-forming domain carrying a mutation located in the voltage-gated region: this mutant was devoid of pore-forming activity but still inserted into the membrane. Our results indicate that the immunity protein interacts with the membrane-anchored channel domain; the interaction requires a functional membrane-inserted immunity protein but does not require the channel to be in the open state.     

Colicin A Immunity Protein Interacts with the Hydrophobic Helical Hairpin of the Colicin A Channel Domain in the Escherichia coli Inner Membrane

The colicin A pore-forming domain (pfColA) was fused to a bacterial signal peptide (sp-pfColA). This was inserted into the Escherichia coli inner membrane in functional form and could be coimmunoprecipitated with epitope-tagged immunity protein (EpCai). We constructed a series of fusion proteins in which various numbers of sp-pfColA alpha-helices were fused to alkaline phosphatase (AP). We showed that a fusion protein made up of the hydrophobic alpha-helices 8 and 9 of sp-pfColA fused to AP was specifically coimmunoprecipitated with EpCai produced in the same cells. This is the first biochemical evidence that Cai recognizes and interacts with the colicin A hydrophobic helical hairpin.     

The pore-forming domain of colicin A fused to a signal peptide: a tool for studying pore-formation and inhibition

Pore-forming colicins are plasmid-encoded bacteriocins that kill Escherichia coli and closely related bacteria. They bind to receptors in the outer membrane and are translocated across the cell envelope to the inner membrane where they form voltage-dependent ion-channels. Colicins are composed of three domains, with the C-terminal domain responsible for pore-formation. Isolated C-terminal pore-forming domains produced in the cytoplasm of E. coli are inactive due to the polarity of the transmembrane electrochemical potential, which is the opposite of that required. However, the pore-forming domain of colicin A (pfColA) fused to a prokaryotic signal peptide (sp-pfColA) is transported across and inserts into the inner membrane of E. coli from the periplasmic side, forming a functional channel. Sp-pfColA is specifically inhibited by the colicin A immunity protein (Cai). This construct has been used to investigate colicin A channel formation in vivo and to characterise the interaction of pfColA with Cai within the inner membrane. These points will be developed further in this review.     

Transport of proteins to the mitochondrial intermembrane space: the ''sorting'' domain of the cytochrome c1 presequence is a stop-transfer sequence specific for the mitochondrial inner membrane.

The presequence of yeast cytochrome c1 (an inner membrane protein protruding into the intermembrane space) contains a matrix-targeting domain and an intramitochondrial sorting domain. This presequence transports attached subunit IV of cytochrome c oxidase into the intermembrane space (van Loon et al. (1987) EMBO J., 6, 2433-2439). In order to determine how this fusion protein reaches the intermembrane space, we studied the kinetics of its import into isolated mitochondria or mitoplasts and its accumulation in the various submitochondrial compartments. The imported, uncleaved fusion precursor and a cleavage intermediate were bound to the inner membrane and were always exposed to the intermembrane space; they were never found at the matrix side of the inner membrane. In contrast, analogous import experiments with the authentic subunit IV precursor, or the precursor of the iron-sulphur protein of the cytochrome bc1 complex also an inner membrane protein exposed to the intermembrane space), readily showed that these precursors were initially transported across both mitochondrial membranes. We conclude that the intramitochondrial sorting domain within the cytochrome c1 presequence prevents transport of attached proteins across the inner, but not the outer membrane: it is a stop-transfer sequence for the inner membrane. Since the presequence of the iron-sulphur protein lacks such 'stop-transfer' domain, it acts by a different mechanism.     

The Tip of the Hydrophobic Hairpin of Colicin U Is Dispensable for Colicin U Activity but Is Important for Interaction with the Immunity Protein

The hydrophobic C terminus of pore-forming colicins associates with and inserts into the cytoplasmic membrane and is the target of the respective immunity protein. The hydrophobic region of colicin U of Shigella boydii was mutated to identify determinants responsible for recognition of colicin U by the colicin U immunity protein. Deletion of the tip of the hydrophobic hairpin of colicin U resulted in a fully active colicin that was no longer inactivated by the colicin U immunity protein. Replacement of eight amino acids at the tip of the colicin U hairpin by the corresponding amino acids of the related colicin B resulted in colicin U(575–582ColB), which was inactivated by the colicin U immunity protein to 10% of the level of inactivation of the wild-type colicin U. The colicin B immunity protein inactivated colicin U(575–582ColB) to the same degree. These results indicate that the tip of the hydrophobic hairpin of colicin U and of colicin B mainly determines the interaction with the corresponding immunity proteins and is not required for colicin activity. Comparison of these results with published data suggests that interhelical loops and not membrane helices of pore-forming colicins mainly interact with the cognate immunity proteins and that the loops are located in different regions of the A-type and E1-type colicins. The colicin U immunity protein forms four transmembrane segments in the cytoplasmic membrane, and the N and C termini face the cytoplasm.     

Functional domains of colicin A

A large number of mutations which introduce deletions in colicin A have been constructed. The partially deleted colicin A proteins were purified and their activity in vivo (on sensitive cells) and in vitro (in planar lipid bilayers) was assayed. The receptor-binding properties of each protein were also analysed. From these results, we suggest that the NH₂-terminal region of colicin A (residues 1 to 172) is involved in the translocation step through the outer membrane. The central region of colicin A (residues 173 to 336) contains the receptor-binding domain. The COOH-terminal domain (residues 389 to 592) carries the pore-forming activity.     

Channel domain of colicin A modifies the dimeric organization of its immunity protein

Proteins conferring immunity against pore-forming colicins are localized in the Escherichia coli inner membrane. Their protective effects are mediated by direct interaction with the C-terminal domain of their cognate colicins. Cai, the immunity protein protecting E. coli against colicin A, contains four cysteine residues. We report cysteine cross-linking experiments showing that Cai forms homodimers. Cai contains four transmembrane segments (TMSs), and dimerization occurs via the third TMS. Furthermore, we observe the formation of intramolecular disulfide bonds that connect TMS2 with either TMS1 or TMS3. Co-expression of Cai with its target, the colicin A pore-forming domain (pfColA), in the inner membrane prevents the formation of intermolecular and intramolecular disulfide bonds, indicating that pfColA interacts with the dimer of Cai and modifies its conformation. Finally, we show that when Cai is locked by disulfide bonds, it is no longer able to protect cells against exogenous added colicin A.     

Problems in Obtaining Diffraction-quality Crystals of Hetero-oligomeric Integral Membrane Proteins

The major barrier responsible for the slow pace of structure determination of integral membrane proteins is the difficulty of crystallizing detergent-solubilized hydrophobic proteins, particularly hetero-oligomeric integral membrane proteins. For the latter class of multi-subunit proteins, we have encountered the following problems in addition to the ubiquitous problem of detergent compatibility: (i) instability caused by over-purification that results in delipidation; (ii) protease activity degrading exposed loops and termini of subunits of the complex that could not be inhibited; (iii) poor protein–protein contacts presumably arising from masking by the detergent micelle. Problem (i) could be ameliorated in crystallization of the cytochrome b₆f complex by augmenting the delipidated complex with synthetic lipid. Problem (ii) has not been solved. Problem (iii) has been solved in other systems by the use of monoclonal antibodies (or other protein ligands) to increase the probability of protein–protein contacts. In the case of the complex formed by the cobalamin and colicin receptor, BtuB, and the receptor binding domain of colicin E3, the latter served as a ligand for protein–protein contacts that facilitated crystallization.     

Identification of the plasmid-encoded immunity protein for colicin El in the inner membrane of Escherichia coli

A set of plasmids containing portions of the Col El plasmid were transformed into recA⁻ cells. These cells, after UV irradiation, only incorporate labelled amino acids into plasmid-encoded proteins. UV-irradiated cells label a 14.5 kDa band if they are phenotypically immune to colicin E1, and do not contain this band if they are sensitive to colicin E1. We conclude that the 14.5 kDa protein is the colicin E1 immunity protein. When the inner and outer membranes of these cells are fractionated, the labelled band appears in the inner membrane. The immunity protein must be an intrinsic inner membrane protein, confirming the predictions made by hydrophobicity calculations from primary sequence data.MaxicellCol El plasmidImmunity proteinHydrophobicity calculation     

Energy-dependent Immunity Protein Release during tol-dependent Nuclease Colicin Translocation

Nuclease colicins bind their target receptor in the outer membrane of sensitive cells in the form of a high affinity complex with their cognate immunity proteins. Upon cell entry the immunity protein is lost from the complex by means that are poorly understood. We have developed a sensitive fluorescence assay that has enabled us to study the molecular requirements for immunity protein release. Nuclease colicins use members of the tol operon for their translocation across the outer membrane. We have demonstrated that the amino-terminal 80 residues of the colicin E9 molecule, which is the region that interacts with TolB, are essential for immunity protein release. Using tol deletion strains we analyzed the cellular components necessary for immunity protein release and found that in addition to a requirement for tolB, the tolA deletion strain was most affected. Complementation studies showed that the mutation H22A, within the transmembrane segment of TolA, abolishes immunity protein release. Investigation of the energy requirements demonstrated that the proton motive force of the cytoplasmic membrane is critical. Taken together these results demonstrate for the first time a clear energy requirement for the uptake of a nuclease colicin complex and suggest that energy transduced from the cytoplasmic membrane to the outer membrane by TolA could be the driving force for immunity protein release and concomitant translocation of the nuclease domain.Membrane translocation is a formidable challenge for folded proteins. Eukaryotes have an array of dedicated translocation machineries to accomplish this feat, for example during mitochondrial import of cytosolic precursor proteins for which it has recently become clear that there is a surprising diversity in targeting signals, import routes, and translocation complexes (1, 2). It is now widely accepted that the mitochondrial genome originated from within the (eu)bacterial domain of life, so it should perhaps not come as a surprise that certain features of mitochondrial import have evolved from these ancestors.Gram-negative bacteria possess two membranes to protect them from the external world, separated by a layer of peptidoglycan and the periplasmic space. Their outer membrane, with its asymmetrical composition of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)² and phospholipids, forms an impressive barrier to most substances with the exception of small hydrophilic nutrients that can diffuse through the resident porins (3). Processes that require an energy input at the outer membrane, such as iron siderophore uptake, therefore often rely on energy generated by ion gradients at the cytoplasmic membrane (4). Energy-transducing systems such as the ton and tol systems in Escherichia coli harvest energy generated at the cytoplasmic membrane and transduce it to the outer membrane. These two systems have a number of features in common, and cross-complementation between the two systems has been observed (5).The energy transducing capacity of the ton system is somewhat better defined and is accomplished by three proteins: the cytoplasmic membrane proteins ExbB and ExbD, which form a heteromultimeric complex that interacts with TonB (4). As a result, TonB undergoes a conformational change in response to the PMF of the cytoplasmic membrane, which allows it to traverse the periplasm and make contact with nutrient-loaded outer membrane receptors, thereby facilitating active import (6). The homology between ExbB/D, TolQ/R, and the PMF-responsive flagellar motor proteins MotA and MotB is well established, and the cumulative evidence now suggests that they act as energy-harvesting complexes (7–9). Evidence of an evolutionary relationship between TolA and TonB comes from work demonstrating structural similarities between the Pseudomonas aeruginosa TolAIII globular domain and the carboxyl-terminal domain of E. coli TonB despite the very low sequence conservation (10). The activities of TonB and TolA are also critically dependent on a conserved SHLS motif in their transmembrane region, the mutation of which affects the interaction with their respective energy-harvesting complexes (11, 12). The cellular function of the tol system in E. coli is, however, less clear. It is thought that the Tol proteins play a role in maintaining cell envelope integrity through a network of interactions spanning the cytoplasmic membrane, periplasm, and outer membrane (13).Both energy-transducing systems have been parasitized by the colicins, plasmid-encoded antibacterial proteins produced by E. coli, and phages for their translocation into the cell, but the energy requirements for these processes are not unequivocal (14). Group A colicins use the tol system and group B colicins the ton system in a process whereby interactions of their amino-terminal translocation domains with the Tol or Ton proteins in the periplasm ultimately lead to the entry of their carboxyl-terminal cytotoxic domain into the cell (15, 16). In common with most colicins, the DNase-type colicin E9 consists of three functional domains: the killing activity is contained in its carboxyl-terminal DNase domain; the central section contains the receptor-binding domain, which binds the vitamin B₁₂ receptor, BtuB, in the outer membrane; and the amino-terminal translocation domain is needed for the entry of the cytotoxic domain into the target cell. The first 83 residues of this translocation domain, commonly referred to as the NDR, contain the OmpF and TolB binding sites (17, 18). Upon synthesis colicin E9 forms a high affinity interaction with its cognate immunity protein, Im9, also encoded by the colicin operon. This heterodimeric complex formation protects colicin-producing cells against DNA damage and potential suicide prior to release of the complex in the environment. The nature of the complex formation between colicin E9 and Im9 and other colicin-immunity complexes has been well characterized, and in the case of colicin E9-Im9 the interaction is strong, as reflected by its dissociation constant on the order of 10⁻¹⁴ m under physiological conditions (19). Despite the high avidity of this interaction, the DNase domain of colicin E9 appears to have only a marginally stabilizing effect on Im9 (20).Currently much progress is being made to unravel the early events that take place after receptor binding, where it has been shown that the colicin E9 NDR enters the periplasm through the OmpF lumen where it interacts with TolB, possibly displacing it from its interaction with Pal (18, 21–24). It was also recently demonstrated that the receptor binding and translocation domains remain in contact with their binding partners in the outer membrane and the periplasm, respectively, when the DNase domain gains access to the cytoplasm (25). In contrast, the molecular mechanisms that govern the loss of the immunity protein from the colicin complex and the cell entry of the DNase domain are less well documented. Because of the strength of the interaction between the colicin and its cognate immunity protein, it has been proposed that removal of the immunity protein from the complex would require a cellular energy source. One recent report investigating immunity protein loss from the colicin E2-Im2 complex qualitatively concluded that receptor binding alone does not lead to immunity protein release and that a functional tol translocation complex is required to establish immunity protein release (26).Here we have presented data that for the first time demonstrate a role for the individual Tol proteins and address the issue of energy requirements for immunity protein release. We observed, by using a previously described disulfide-“locked” colicin construct and domain deletion mutants thereof, that entry of the amino-terminal 80 residues of the colicin translocation domain and its interaction with TolB are essential factors for immunity protein release. We have also demonstrated a crucial role for TolA and its transmembrane region in this process, showing that immunity protein release from the colicin complex is an energy-dependent process governed by the cytoplasmic membrane PMF. Finally we have provided a rationale for how an energized Tol system might lead to immunity protein loss and concomitant colicin uptake in sensitive cells.     

Sequence, expression and localization of the immunity protein for colicin B

Summary Cells of Escherichia coli containing the cbi locus on plasmids are immune to colicin B which kills cells by dissipating the membrane potential through pore formation in the cytoplasmic membrane. The nucleotide sequence of the cbi region was determined. It contains an open reading frame for a polypeptide consisting of 175 amino acids. The amino acid sequence is homologous to the primary structure of the colicin A immunity protein. This, and the strong homology between the pore-forming domains of colicins A and B suggests a common evolutionary origin for both colicins. The immunity protein could be identified following strong overexpression of cbi. The electrophoretically determined molecular weight of 20 000 was close to the calculated molecular weight of 20 185. The protein contains four large hydrophobic regions. The immunity protein was localized in the membrane fraction and was mainly contained in the cytoplasmic membrane. It is proposed that the immunity protein inactivates the colicin in the cytoplasmic membrane.     

An alpha-helical hydrophobic hairpin as a specific determinant in protein-protein interaction occurring in Escherichia coli colicin A and B immunity systems.

A collection of chimeric pore-forming domains between colicins A and B was constructed to investigate the specific determinants responsible for recognition by the corresponding immunity proteins. The fusion sites in the hybrid proteins were positioned according to the three-dimensional structure of the soluble form of the colicin A pore-forming domain. The hydrophobic hairpin of colicin pore-forming domains, buried in the core of the soluble structure, was the main determinant recognized by the integral immunity proteins. The immunity protein function may require helix-helix recognition within the lipid bilayer.     

On the role of lipid in colicin pore formation

Insights into the protein-membrane interactions by which the C-terminal pore-forming domain of colicins inserts into membranes and forms voltage-gated channels, and the nature of the colicin channel, are provided by data on: (i) the flexible helix-elongated state of the colicin pore-forming domain in the fluid anionic membrane interfacial layer, the optimum anionic surface charge for channel formation, and voltage-gated translocation of charged regions of the colicin domain across the membrane; (ii) structure-function data on the voltage-gated K(+) channel showing translocation of an arginine-rich helical segment through the membrane; (iii) toroidal channels formed by small peptides that involve local participation of anionic lipids in an inverted phase. It is proposed that translocation of the colicin across the membrane occurs through minimization of the Born charging energy for translocation of positively charged basic residues across the lipid bilayer by neutralization with anionic lipid head groups. The resulting pore structure may consist of somewhat short, ca. 16 residues, trans-membrane helices, in a locally thinned membrane, together with surface elements of inverted phase lipid micelles.     

Uptake across the cell envelope and insertion into the inner membrane of ion channel-forming colicins in E coli.

Pore-forming colicins exert their lethal effect on E coli through formation of a voltage-dependent channel in the inner (cytoplasmic-membrane) thus destroying the energy potential of sensitive cells. Their mode of action appears to involve 3 steps: i) binding to a specific receptor located in the outer membrane; ii) translocation across this membrane; iii) insertion into the inner membrane. Colicin A has been used as a prototype of pore-forming colicins. In this review, the 3 functional domains of colicin A respectively involved in receptor binding, translocation and pore formation, are defined. The components of sensitive cells implicated in colicin uptake and their interactions with the various colicin A domains are described. The 3-dimensional structure of the pore-forming domain of colicin A has been determined recently. This structure suggests a model of insertion into the cytoplasmic membrane which is supported by model membrane studies. The role of the membrane potential in channel functioning is also discussed.     

Colicin import and pore formation: a system for studying protein transport across membranes?

Pore-forming colicins are a family of protein toxins (M_r40–70kDa) produced by Escherichia coli and related bacteria. They are bactericidal by virtue of their ability to form ion channels in the inner membrane of target cells. They provide a useful means of studying questions such as toxin action, polypeptide translocation across and into membranes, voltage-gated channels and receptor function. These colicins bind to a receptor in the outer membrane before being translocated across the cell envelope with the aid of helper proteins that belong to nutrient-uptake systems and the so-called‘Tol’proteins, the function of which has not yet been properly defined. A distinct domain appears to be associated with each of three steps (receptor binding, translocation and formation of voltage-gated channels). The Tol-dependent uptake pathway is described here. The structures and interactions of TolA, B, Q and R have by now been quite clearly defined. Transmembrane α-helix interactions are required for the functional assembly of the E. coli Tol complex, which is preferentially located at contact sites between the inner and outer membranes. The number of colicin translocation sites is about 1000 per cell. The role and the involvement of the OmpF porin (with colicins A and N) have been described in a recent study on the structural and functional interactions of a colicin-resistant mutant of OmpF. The X-ray crystal structure of the channel-forming fragment of colicin A and that of the entire colicin la have provided the basis for biophysical and site-directed muta-genesis studies. Thanks to this powerful combination, it has been established that the interaction with the receptor in the outer membrane leads to a very substantial conformational change, as a result of which the N-terminal domains of colicins interact with the lumen of the OmpF pore and then with the C-terminal domain of TolA. A molten globular conformation of colicins probably constitutes the intermediate translocation/insertion competent state. Once the pore has formed, the polypeptide chain spans the whole cell envelope. Three distinct steps occur in the last stage of the process: (i) fast binding of the C-terminal domain to the outer face of the cytoplasmic membrane; (ii) a slow insertion of the polypeptide chain into the outer face of the inner membrane in the absence of Δψ and (iii) a profound reorganization of the helix association, triggered by the transmembrane potential and resulting in the formation of the colicin channel.     

A cytochrome c fusion protein domain for convenient detection, quantification, and enhanced production of membrane proteins in Escherichia coli��Expression and characterization of cytochrome-tagged Complex I subunits

Overproduction of membrane proteins can be a cumbersome task, particularly if high yields are desirable. NADH:quinone oxidoreductase (Complex I) contains several very large membrane‐spanning protein subunits that hitherto have been impossible to express individually in any appreciable amounts in Escherichia coli. The polypeptides contain no prosthetic groups and are poorly antigenic, making optimization of protein production a challenging task. In this work, the C‐terminal ends of the Complex I subunits NuoH, NuoL, NuoM, and NuoN from E. coli Complex I and the bona fide antiporters MrpA and MrpD were genetically fused to the cytochrome c domain of Bacillus subtilis cytochrome c₅₅₀. Compared with other available fusion‐protein tagging systems, the cytochrome c has several advantages. The heme is covalently bound, renders the proteins visible by optical spectroscopy, and can be used to monitor, quantify, and determine the orientation of the polypeptides in a plethora of experiments. For the antiporter‐like subunits NuoL, NuoM, and NuoN and the real antiporters MrpA and MrpD, unprecedented amounts of holo‐cytochrome fusion proteins could be obtained in E. coli. The NuoHcyt polypeptide was also efficiently produced, but heme insertion was less effective in this construct. The cytochrome c₅₅₀ domain in all the fusion proteins exhibited normal spectra and redox properties, with an E_m of about +170 mV. The MrpA and MrpD antiporters remained functional after being fused to the cytochrome c‐tag. Finally, a his‐tag could be added to the cytochrome domain, without any perturbations to the cytochrome properties, allowing efficient purification of the overexpressed fusion proteins.     

High level expression of His-tagged colicin pore-forming domains and reflections on the sites for pore formation in the inner membrane

There exists ample evidence for the assumption that pore-forming colicins cannot exert their toxicity within the producing cell and that they must gain access to the outer face of the cytoplasmic membrane to achieve this. We wished to construct pET-vectors to produce pore-forming domains of colicin A and N with N-terminal hexa-histidine tags under the control of a T7 promoter. This was only possible when the correct immunity protein was also present. Hence it appears that this system exhibits the peculiarity that there is a toxicity associated with the over produced pore-forming domain. However, when the ratio of colicin to immunity protein is compared it is still clear that direct insertion into the cytoplasmic membrane does not occur and that membrane translocation of the colicin at limited sites may be occurring. This article reviews previous literature on the subject in terms of a model for limited sites of colicin action.     

Individual domains of colicins confer specificity in colicin uptake, in pore-properties and in immunity requirement.

Six different hybrid colicins were constructed by recombining various domains of the two pore-forming colicins A and E1. These hybrid colicins were purified and their properties were studied. All of them were active against sensitive cells, although to varying degrees. From the results, one can conclude that: (1) the binding site of OmpF is located in the N-terminal domain of colicin A; (2) the OmpF, TolB and TolR dependence for translocation is also located in this domain; (3) the TolC dependence for colicin E1 is located in the N-terminal domain of colicin E1; (4) the 183 N-terminal amino acid residues of colicin E1 are sufficient to promote E1AA uptake and thus probably colicin E1 uptake; (5) there is an interaction between the central domain and C-terminal domain of colicin A; (6) the individual functioning of different domains in various hybrids suggests that domain interactions can be reconstituted in hybrids that are fully active, whereas in others that are much less active, non-proper domain interactions may interfere with translocation; (7) there is a specific recognition of the C-terminal domains of colicin A and colicin E1 by their respective immunity proteins.     

Conservative sorting of F0-ATPase subunit 9: export from matrix requires delta pH across inner membrane and matrix ATP.

In an attempt to understand the mechanisms of sorting of mitochondrial inner membrane proteins, we have analyzed the import of subunit 9 of the mitochondrial F1F0-ATPase (Su9) from Neurospora crassa, an integral inner membrane protein. A chimeric protein was used consisting of the presequence and the first transmembrane domain of Su9 fused to mouse dihydrofolate reductase (preSu9(1-112)-DHFR). This protein attains the correct topology across the inner membrane (Nout-Cin) following import. The transmembrane domain becomes first completely imported into the matrix, where after processing of the presequence, it mediates membrane insertion and export of the N-terminal tail. Import and export steps can be experimentally dissected into two distinct events. Translocation of the N-terminal hydrophilic tail out of the matrix was blocked when the presequence was not processed, indicating an important role of the sequences and charges flanking the hydrophobic domain. Furthermore, export was supported by a delta pH and required matrix ATP hydrolysis. Thus the hydrophobic transmembrane domain operates as a membrane insertion signal and not as a stop-transfer signal. Our findings suggest that several aspects of this sorting process have been conserved from their prokaryotic ancestors.     

IN VIVO CHARACTERIZATION OF THE DIATOM MULTIPARTATE PLASTID TARGETING SIGNAL

Diatoms and related algae have plastids that are surrounded by four membranes. The outer two membranes are continuous with the endoplasmic reticulum and the inner two membranes are analogous to the plastid envelope membranes of higher plants and green algae. Thus the plastids are completely compartmentalized within the ER membranes. The targeting presequences for nuclear‐encoded plastid proteins have two recognizable domains. The first domain is a classic signal sequence, which presumably targets the proteins to the endoplasmic reticulum. The second domain has characteristics of a transit peptide, which targets proteins to the plastids of higher plants. To characterize these targeting domains, the presequence from the nuclear‐encoded plastid protein AtpC was utilized. A series of deletions of this presequence were fused to Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) and transformed into cells of the diatom, Phaeodactylum tricornutum. The intracelluar localization of GFP was visualized by fluorescence microscopy. This work demonstrates that the first domain of the presequence is responsible for targeting proteins to the ER lumen and is the essential first step in the plastid protein import process. The second domain is responsible to directing proteins from the ER and through the plastid envelope and only a short portion of the transit peptide‐like domain is necessary to complete this second processing step. In vivo data generated from this study in a fully homologous transformation system has confirmed Gibbs' hypothesis regarding a multistep import process for plastid proteins in chromophytic algae.