Chromatin dynamics and the repair of DNA double strand breaks

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) arise through both replication errors and from exogenous events such as exposure to ionizing radiation. DSBs are potentially lethal, and cells have evolved a highly conserved mechanism to detect and repair these lesions. This mechanism involves phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γH2AX) and the loading of DNA repair proteins onto the chromatin adjacent to the DSB. It is now clear that the chromatin architecture in the region surrounding the DSB has a critical impact on the ability of cells to mount an effective DNA damage response. DSBs promote the formation of open, relaxed chromatin domains which are spatially confined to the area surrounding the break. These relaxed chromatin structures are created through the coupled action of the p400 SWI/SNF ATPase and histone acetylation by the Tip60 acetyltransferase. The resulting destabilization of nucleosomes at the DSB by Tip60 and p400 is required for ubiquitination of the chromatin by the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase, and for the subsequent recruitment of the brca1 complex. Chromatin dynamics at DSBs can therefore exert a powerful influence on the process of DSB repair. Further, there is emerging evidence that the different chromatin structures in the cell, such as heterochromatin and euchromatin, utilize distinct remodeling complexes and pathways to facilitate DSB. The processing and repair of DSB is therefore critically influenced by the nuclear architecture in which the lesion arises.Key words: p400, chromatin remodeling, DNA repair, NuA4, H2AX, acetylation, nucleosome, tip60Damage to cellular DNA can occur through multiple pathways, including exposure to genotoxic agents, the production of endogenous reactive oxygen species or errors which arise during DNA replication. To combat this continuous assault on the genome, mammalian cells have evolved multiple DNA repair pathways. The most challenging lesions to repair are DSBs, which physically cleave the DNA strand. DSBs can occur through exposure to IR, the collapse of replication forks or during the processing of certain types of DNA damage. Over the last 20 years, a clear picture of how the cell detects and repairs DSBs has emerged.^1,2 The earliest event in the cell''s response to DSBs is the rapid recruitment of the ATM kinase, followed by the phosphorylation of histone H2AX (termed γH2AX) on large chromatin domains which extend for 100''s of kilobases on either side of the DSB.³ The mdc1 scaffold protein is then recruited to γH2AX,⁴ providing a docking platform for the recruitment and retention of additional DNA repair proteins, including the MRN complex, the RNF8 ubiquitin ligase and the brca1 and 53BP1 proteins, onto the chromatin at DSBs.^5–7 Eventually, this spreading of DNA repair proteins along the chromatin from the DSB leads to the formation of IRIF, which can be visualized by immunofluorescent techniques. DSBs are then repaired by NHEJ, in which broken DNA ends are directly religated, or by HR, using the undamaged sister chromatid (present during S-phase) as a template. A defining characteristic of DSB repair is the dominant role that chromatin structure plays in the detection and repair of these lesions. In this review, we will examine recent work exploring how remodeling of the chromatin structure adjacent to DSBs plays a key role in the repair of DSBs.     

Methoxyamine potentiates DNA single strand breaks and double strand breaks induced by temozolomide in colon cancer cells

We have previously shown that human cancer cells deficient in DNA mismatch repair (MMR) are resistant to the chemotherapeutic methylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) and can be sensitized by the base excision repair (BER) blocking agent methoxyamine (MX) [21]. To further characterize BER-mediated repair responses to methylating agent-induced DNA damage, we have now evaluated the effect of MX on TMZ-induced DNA single strand breaks (SSB) by alkaline elution and DNA double strand breaks (DSB) by pulsed field gel electrophoresis in SW480 (O6-alkylguanine-DNA-alkyltransferase [AGT]+, MMR wild type) and HCT116 (AGT+, MMR deficient) colon cancer cells. SSB were evident in both cell lines after a 2-h exposure to equitoxic doses of temozolomide. MX significantly increased the number of TMZ-induced DNA-SSB in both cell lines. In contrast to SSB, TMZ-induced DNA-DSB were dependent on MMR status and were time-dependent. Levels of 50 kb double stranded DNA fragments in MMR proficient cells were increased after TMZ alone or in combination with O6-benzylguanine or MX, whereas, in MMR deficient HCT116 cells, only TMZ plus MX produced significant levels of DNA-DSB. Levels of AP endonuclease, XRCC1 and polymerase beta were present in both cell lines and were not significantly altered after MX and TMZ. However, cleavage of a 30-mer double strand substrate by SW480 and HCT116 crude cell extracts was inhibited by MX plus TMZ. Thus, MX potentiation of TMZ cytotoxicity may be explained by the persistence of apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites not further processed due to the presence of MX. Furthermore, in MMR-deficient, TMZ-resistant HCT116 colon cancer cells, MX potentiates TMZ cytotoxicity through formation of large DS-DNA fragmentation and subsequent apoptotic signalling.     

Coping with DNA double strand breaks

The repair of DNA double strand breaks (dsb) is important for maintaining the physical and genetic integrity of the genome. Moreover, in humans it is associated with the prevention of diseases such as immune deficiencies and cancer. This review briefly explores the fundamental strategies for repairing dsb, examines how cells maximize the fidelity of dsb repair in the cell cycle and discusses the requirements for dsb repair in the context of chromatin.     

DNA ends: maintenance of chromosome termini versus repair of double strand breaks

This review focuses on the factors that define the differences between the two types of DNA ends encountered by eukaryotic cells: telomeres and double strand breaks (DSBs). Although these two types of DNA termini are functionally distinct, recent studies have shown that a number of proteins is shared at telomeres and sites of DSB repair. The significance of these common components is discussed, as well as the types of DNA repair events that can compensate for a defective telomere.     

Activity of ribonucleotide reductase helps determine how cells repair DNA double strand breaks

Mammalian cells can choose either nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR) for repair of chromosome breaks. Of these two pathways, HR alone requires extensive DNA synthesis and thus abundant synthesis precursors (dNTPs). We address here if this differing requirement for dNTPs helps determine how cells choose a repair pathway. Cellular dNTP pools are regulated primarily by changes in ribonucleotide reductase activity. We show that an inhibitor of ribonucleotide reductase (hydroxyurea) hypersensitizes NHEJ-deficient cells, but not wild type or HR-deficient cells, to chromosome breaks introduced by ionizing radiation. Hydroxyurea additionally reduces the frequency of irradiated cells with a marker for an early step in HR, Rad51 foci, consistent with reduced initiation of HR under these conditions. Conversely, promotion of ribonucleotide reductase activity protects NHEJ-deficient cells from ionizing radiation. Importantly, promotion of ribonucleotide reductase activity also increases usage of HR in cells proficient in both NHEJ and HR at a targeted chromosome break. Activity of ribonucleotide reductase is thus an important factor in determining how mammalian cells repair broken chromosomes. This may explain in part why G1/G0 cells, which have reduced ribonucleotide reductase activity, rely more on NHEJ for DSB repair.     

Chromosomal aberrations induced by double strand DNA breaks

It has been suggested that introduction of double strand DNA breaks (DSBs) into mammalian chromosomes can lead to gross chromosomal rearrangements through improper DNA repair. To study this phenomenon, we employed a model system in which a double strand DNA break can be produced in human cells in vivo at a predetermined location. The ensuing chromosomal changes flanking the breakage site can then be cloned and characterized. In this system, the recognition site for the I-SceI endonuclease, whose 18 bp recognition sequence is not normally found in the human genome, is placed between a strong constitutive promoter and the Herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) gene, which serves as a negative selectable marker. We found that the most common mutation following aberrant DSB repair was an interstitial deletion; these deletions typically showed features of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), such as microhomologies and insertions of direct or inverted repeat sequences. We also detected more complex rearrangements, including large insertions from adjacent or distant genomic regions. The insertion events that involved distant genomic regions typically represented transcribed sequences, and included both L1 LINE elements and sequences known to be involved in genomic rearrangements. This type of aberrant repair could potentially lead to gene inactivation via deletion of coding or regulatory sequences, or production of oncogenic fusion genes via insertion of coding sequences.     

Deficient repair of particulate hexavalent chromium-induced DNA double strand breaks leads to neoplastic transformation

Hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) is a potent respiratory toxicant and carcinogen. The most carcinogenic forms of Cr(VI) are the particulate salts such as lead chromate, which deposit and persist in the respiratory tract after inhalation. We demonstrate here that particulate chromate induces DNA double strand breaks in human lung cells with 0.1, 0.5, and 1 microg/cm(2) lead chromate inducing 1.5, 2, and 5 relative increases in the percent of DNA in the comet tail, respectively. These lesions are repaired within 24 h and require Mre11 expression for their repair. Particulate chromate also caused Mre11 to co-localize with gamma-H2A.X and ATM. Failure to repair these breaks with Mre11-induced neoplastic transformation including loss of cell contact inhibition and anchorage-independent growth. A 5-day exposure to lead chromate induced loss of cell contact inhibition in a concentration-dependent manner with 0, 0.1, 0.5, and 1 microg/cm(2) lead chromate inducing 1, 78, and 103 foci in 20 dishes, respectively. These data indicate that Mre11 is critical to repairing particulate Cr(VI)-induced double strand breaks and preventing Cr(VI)-induced neoplastic transformation.     

Induction and repair of DNA strand breaks in Bacteroides fragilis

Alkaline sucrose gradient sedimentation was used to establish whether strand breakage and repair take place in the DNA of UV-irradiated Bacteroides fragilis during the removal of pyrimidine dimers. A B. fragilis wild-type strain and two of its repair mutants, a mitomycin C sensitive mutant (MTC25) having wild-type levels of UV survival, and a UV-sensitive, mitomycin C sensitive mutant (UVS9), were investigated. Under anaerobic conditions, far-UV irradiation induced metabolically regulated strand breakage and resynthesis in the wild-type strain, but this was markedly reduced in both the MTC25 and UVS9 mutants. Approximately half of the strand breaks generated by the various strains were rejoined during further holding in buffer. Under replicating conditions, complete repair of strand breaks in the wild type was observed. Caffeine treatment under anaerobic conditions caused direct DNA strand breakage in B. fragilis cells but did not inhibit UV-induced breakage or repair.     

Targeting the DNA double strand break repair machinery in prostate cancer

Regardless of the achievable remissions with first line hormone therapy in patients with prostate cancer (CaP), the disease escapes the hormone dependent stage to a more aggressive status where chemotherapy is the only effective treatment and no treatment is curative. This makes it very important to identify new targets that can improve the outcome of treatment. ATM and DNA-PK are the two kinases responsible for signalling and repairing double strand breaks (DSB). Thus, both kinases are pertinent targets in CaP treatment to enhance the activity of the numerous DNA DSB inducing agents used in CaP treatment such as ionizing radiation (IR). Colony formation assay was used to assess the sensitivity of hormone dependent, p53 wt (LNCaP) and hormone independent p53 mutant (PC3) CaP cell lines to the cytotoxic effect of IR and Doxorubicin in the presence or absence of Ku55933 and NU7441 which are small molecule inhibitors of ATM and DNA-PK, respectively. Flow cytometry based methods were used to assess the effect of the two inhibitors on cell cycle, apoptosis and H2AX foci formation. Neutral comet assay was used to assess the induction of DNA DSBs. Ku55933 or NU7441 alone increased the sensitivity of CaP cell lines to the DNA damaging agents, however combining both inhibitors together resulted in further enhancement of sensitivity. The cell cycle profile of both cell lines was altered with increased cell death, DNA DSBs and H2AX foci formation. This study justifies further evaluation of the ATM and DNA-PK inhibitors for clinical application in CaP patients. Additionally, the augmented effect resulting from combining both inhibitors may have a significant implication for the treatment of CaP patients who have a defect in one of the two DSB repair pathways.     

Joining of nonhomologous DNA double strand breaks in vitro.

Extracts of Xenopus laevis eggs can efficiently join ends of duplex DNA that differ in structure and sequence. This was analysed by recircularisation of linear plasmid DNA molecules with dissimilar termini, generated by successive cuts with two different restriction enzymes within the pSP65 polylinker. Use of various enzymes provided blunt ended or 4 nucleotides long 3' and 5' protruding single strand (PSS) termini which were successfully joined in vitro in any tested combination. Sequence analysis of numerous junctions from cloned reaction products of 7 terminus combinations reveal: apart from very rare base exchanges and single nucleotide insertions less than 10% deletions (1 to 18 nucleotides long) were detected. Blunt/PSS or 3'PSS/5'PSS terminus pairs undergo simple "blunt end" joining which preserves PSS ends by fill-in. In contrast, equally polar 3'PSS/3'PSS or 5'PSS/5'PSS terminus pairs are joined by a complex mode: PSS ends overlap by a defined number of nucleotides, set by matching basepairs. Even one basematch suffices to define the setting. This then determines the final mismatch repair and fill-in pattern. We propose that yet unknown terminal DNA-binding proteins stabilize the energetically highly unfavorable configuration of single matching basepairs and help to support defined overlap structures.     

Bi-directional routing of DNA mismatch repair protein human exonuclease 1 to replication foci and DNA double strand breaks

Human exonuclease 1 (hEXO1) is implicated in DNA metabolism, including replication, recombination and repair, substantiated by its interactions with PCNA, DNA helicases BLM and WRN, and several DNA mismatch repair (MMR) proteins. We investigated the sub-nuclear localization of hEXO1 during S-phase progression and in response to laser-induced DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). We show that hEXO1 and PCNA co-localize in replication foci. This apparent interaction is sustained throughout S-phase. We also demonstrate that hEXO1 is rapidly recruited to DNA DSBs. We have identified a PCNA interacting protein (PIP-box) region on hEXO1 located in its COOH-terminal ((788)QIKLNELW(795)). This motif is essential for PCNA binding and co-localization during S-phase. Recruitment of hEXO1 to DNA DSB sites is dependent on the MMR protein hMLH1. We show that two distinct hMLH1 interaction regions of hEXO1 (residues 390-490 and 787-846) are required to direct the protein to the DNA damage site. Our results reveal that protein domains in hEXO1 in conjunction with specific protein interactions control bi-directional routing of hEXO1 between on-going DNA replication and repair processes in living cells.     

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 modulates DNA repair capacity and prevents formation of DNA double strand breaks

Although poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 (PARP-1) has no enzymatic activity involved in DNA damage processing by the base excision repair (BER) pathway, PARP-1 deficient cells are genetically unstable and sensitive to DNA-damaging agents. To explain this paradox, we investigated the impact of PARP-1 on BER in mammalian cells. We reduced cellular PARP-1 protein levels using siRNA, then introduced DNA damage by hydrogen peroxide treatment and examined the repair response. We find that PARP-1 is not involved in recruitment of the major BER proteins to sites of DNA damage. However, we find that PARP-1 protects excessive DNA single strand breaks (SSBs) from converting into DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) thus preserving them for subsequent repair by BER enzymes. This suggests that PARP-1 plays an important role in BER by extending the ability of BER enzymes to process DNA single strand breaks arising directly after mutagen stress or during processing of DNA lesions following extensive DNA damage.     

A nervous predisposition to unrepaired DNA double strand breaks

Ataxia-telangiectasia (A–T) has for a long time stood apart from most other human neurodegenerative syndromes by the characteristic failure of cells derived from these patients to properly repair DNA damage-induced by ionizing radiation. The discovery of mutations in the ATM gene as being the underlying cause for A–T and the demonstration that the ATM protein functions as a DNA damage-responsive kinase has defined current research focusing on decoding how the cell responds to genotoxic stress. Yet, despite significant advances in delineating the cellular DNA damage response pathways coordinated by ATM, very little headway has been made toward understanding how loss of ATM leads to progressive cerebellar ataxia and whether this can be attributed to an underlying defect in DNA double strand break repair (DSBR). Since its identification, A–T has been used as the archetypal model for how a deficiency in DNA repair affects both the development and maintenance of the nervous and immune systems in humans as well as contributing to the process of tumourigenesis. However, following the growing availability and cost effectiveness of next generation sequencing technologies, the increasing recognition of novel human disorders associated with abnormal DNA repair has demonstrated that the neuropathology typified by A–T is an ‘exception’ rather than the ‘rule’. As a consequence, this throws into doubt the longstanding hypothesis that the neurodegeneration seen in A–T is due to the progressive loss of damaged neurons that have acquired toxic levels of unrepaired DNA lesions over time. Therefore, this review aims to address the question: Is defective DNA double strand break repair an underlying cause of neurodegeneration?     

PARP-1 and Ku compete for repair of DNA double strand breaks by distinct NHEJ pathways

Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase 1 (PARP-1) recognizes DNA strand interruptions in vivo and triggers its own modification as well as that of other proteins by the sequential addition of ADP-ribose to form polymers. This modification causes a release of PARP-1 from DNA ends and initiates a variety of responses including DNA repair. While PARP-1 has been firmly implicated in base excision and single strand break repair, its role in the repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) remains unclear. Here, we show that PARP-1, probably together with DNA ligase III, operates in an alternative pathway of non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) that functions as backup to the classical pathway of NHEJ that utilizes DNA-PKcs, Ku, DNA ligase IV, XRCC4, XLF/Cernunnos and Artemis. PARP-1 binds to DNA ends in direct competition with Ku. However, in irradiated cells the higher affinity of Ku for DSBs and an excessive number of other forms of competing DNA lesions limit its contribution to DSB repair. When essential components of the classical pathway of NHEJ are absent, PARP-1 is recruited for DSB repair, particularly in the absence of Ku and non-DSB lesions. This form of DSB repair is sensitive to PARP-1 inhibitors. The results define the function of PARP-1 in DSB repair and characterize a candidate pathway responsible for joining errors causing genomic instability and cancer.     

Neighborly DISCourse: DNA double strand breaks silence transcription

Comment on: Shanbhag NM, et al. Cell 2010; 141:970-81.     

DNA double strand break repair in mammalian cells

Human cells can process DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) by either homology directed or non-homologous repair pathways. Defects in components of DSB repair pathways are associated with a predisposition to cancer. The products of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, which normally confer protection against breast cancer, are involved in homology-directed DSB repair. Defects in another homology-directed pathway, single-strand annealing, are associated with genome instability and cancer predisposition in the Nijmegen breakage syndrome and a radiation-sensitive ataxia-telangiectasia-like syndrome. Many DSB repair proteins also participate in the signaling pathways which underlie the cell's response to DSBs.     

Repair of DNA double strand breaks by non-homologous end joining

DNA double strand breaks (DSB) are the most serious form of DNA damage. If not repaired they can lead to cell death. If misrepaired DSBs contribute to chromosomal aberrations and genomic instability. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) is one of two major pathways for the repair of DSBs in human cells. Proteins known to be required for NHEJ include the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK), XRCC4, DNA ligase IV, and Artemis. This review discusses how these and other accessory proteins may function in the repair of DSBs produced by ionizing radiation (IR) and by V(D)J recombination.     

Induction and repair of DNA double strand breaks: the increasing spectrum of non-homologous end joining pathways

A defining characteristic of damage induced in the DNA by ionizing radiation (IR) is its clustered character that leads to the formation of complex lesions challenging the cellular repair mechanisms. The most widely investigated such complex lesion is the DNA double strand break (DSB). DSBs undermine chromatin stability and challenge the repair machinery because an intact template strand is lacking to assist restoration of integrity and sequence in the DNA molecule. Therefore, cells have evolved a sophisticated machinery to detect DSBs and coordinate a response on the basis of inputs from various sources. A central function of cellular responses to DSBs is the coordination of DSB repair. Two conceptually different mechanisms can in principle remove DSBs from the genome of cells of higher eukaryotes. Homologous recombination repair (HRR) uses as template a homologous DNA molecule and is therefore error-free; it functions preferentially in the S and G2 phases. Non-homologous end joining (NHEJ), on the other hand, simply restores DNA integrity by joining the two ends, is error prone as sequence is only fortuitously preserved and active throughout the cell cycle. The basis of DSB repair pathway choice remains unknown, but cells of higher eukaryotes appear programmed to utilize preferentially NHEJ. Recent work suggests that when the canonical DNA-PK dependent pathway of NHEJ (D-NHEJ), becomes compromised an alternative NHEJ pathway and not HRR substitutes in a quasi-backup function (B-NHEJ). Here, we outline aspects of DSB induction by IR and review the mechanisms of their processing in cells of higher eukaryotes. We place particular emphasis on backup pathways of NHEJ and summarize their increasing significance in various cellular processes, as well as their potential contribution to carcinogenesis.     

Role for Artemis nuclease in the repair of radiation-induced DNA double strand breaks by alternative end joining

Exposure of cells to ionizing radiation or radiomimetic drugs generates DNA double-strand breaks that are processed either by homologous recombination repair (HRR), or by canonical, DNA-PKcs-dependent non-homologous end-joining (C-NHEJ). Chemical or genetic inactivation of factors involved in C-NHEJ or HRR, but also their local failure in repair proficient cells, promotes an alternative, error-prone end-joining pathway that serves as backup (A-EJ). There is evidence for the involvement of Artemis endonuclease, a protein deficient in a human radiosensitivity syndrome associated with severe immunodeficiency (RS-SCID), in the processing of subsets of DSBs by HRR or C-NHEJ. It is thought that within HRR or C-NHEJ Artemis processes DNA termini at complex DSBs. Whether Artemis has a role in A-EJ remains unknown. Here, we analyze using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and specialized reporter assays, DSB repair in wild-type pre-B NALM-6 lymphocytes, as well as in their Artemis^−/−, DNA ligase 4^−/− (LIG4^−/−), and LIG4^−/−/Artemis^−/− double mutant counterparts, under conditions allowing evaluation of A-EJ. Our results substantiate the suggested roles of Artemis in C-NHEJ and HRR, but also demonstrate a role for the protein in A-EJ that is confirmed in Artemis deficient normal human fibroblasts. We conclude that Artemis is a nuclease participating in DSB repair by all major repair pathways.