Cellular expression patterns of acetylcholinesterase activity during grasshopper development

We examined the expression of acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in the nervous system and epidermal body structures during embryonic and larval development of two grasshopper species: Locusta migratoria and Schistocerca americana. Histochemical labelling was blocked by the enzyme inhibitors eserine and BW284c51, but not by iso-OMPA, showing that the staining reflected true AChE activity. The majority of staining was localized on the cell surface but granular intracellular staining was also visible in many cell bodies. In both species, the cellular expression of AChE followed a similar but complex spatiotemporal staining pattern. Initially, mainly epidermal tissue structures were stained in the various body appendages (stages 25%–30%). Labelling subsequently appeared in outgrowing neurons of the central nervous system (CNS) and in the nerves innervating the limbs and dorsal body wall (stages 30%–40%). The latter staining originated in motoneurons of the ventral nerve cord. In a third phase (after 45%), the somata of certain identified mechanosensory neurons started to express AChE activity, presumably reflecting cholinergic differentiation. Staining was also found in repo-positive glial cells of the CNS, longitudinal glia of connectives, glia of the stomatogastric nervous system and glial cells ensheathing peripheral nerves. Glial cells remained AChE-positive during larval to adult development, whereas motoneurons lost their AChE expression. The expression pattern in non-neuronal cells and glutamatergic motoneurons and the developmental appearance of AChE prior to synaptogenesis in the CNS suggest non-cholinergic functions of AChE during grasshopper embryogenesis. Financial support was provided by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (Bi 262/7-1 and 262/11-1)     

BrdU incorporation reveals DNA replication in non dividing glial cells in the larval abdominal CNS ofDrosophila

Glial cells are of significant importance for central nervous system development and function. In insects, knowledge of the types and development of CNS glia is rather low. This is especially true for postembryonic glial development. Using bromodeoxyuridine incorporation and enhancer trap lines we identified a reproducible spatial and temporal pattern of DNA replicating cells in the abdominal larval CNS (A3-7 neuromeres) ofDrosophila melanogaster. These cells correspond to embryonically established glial cells in that region. Except for a specific subfraction, these cells apparently do not divide during larval life. Similar patterns were found in two otherDrosophila species,D. virilis andD. hydei.     

Volume transmission in activity-dependent regulation of myelinating glia

The importance of neural impulse activity in regulating neuronal plasticity is widely appreciated; increasingly, it is becoming apparent that activity-dependent communication between neurons and glia is critical in regulating many aspects of nervous system development and plasticity. This communication takes place not only at the synapse, but also between premyelinating axons and glia, which form myelin in the PNS and CNS. Recent work indicates that neural impulse activity releases ATP and adenosine from non-synaptic regions of neurons, which activates purinergic receptors on myelinating glia. Acting through this receptor system, neural impulse activity can regulate gene expression, mitosis, differentiation, and myelination of Schwann cells (SCs) and oligodendrocytes, helping coordinate nervous system development with functional activity in the perinatal period. ATP and adenosine have opposite effects on differentiation of Schwann cells and oligodendrocytes, providing a possible explanation for the opposite effects of impulse activity reported on myelination in the CNS and PNS.     

Glial Contributions to Neural Function and Disease

The nervous system consists of neurons and glial cells. Neurons generate and propagate electrical and chemical signals, whereas glia function mainly to modulate neuron function and signaling. Just as there are many different kinds of neurons with different roles, there are also many types of glia that perform diverse functions. For example, glia make myelin; modulate synapse formation, function, and elimination; regulate blood flow and metabolism; and maintain ionic and water homeostasis to name only a few. Although proteomic approaches have been used extensively to understand neurons, the same cannot be said for glia. Importantly, like neurons, glial cells have unique protein compositions that reflect their diverse functions, and these compositions can change depending on activity or disease. Here, I discuss the major classes and functions of glial cells in the central and peripheral nervous systems. I describe proteomic approaches that have been used to investigate glial cell function and composition and the experimental limitations faced by investigators working with glia.The nervous system is composed of neurons and glial cells that function together to create complex behaviors. Traditionally, glia have been considered to be merely passive contributors to brain function, resulting in a pronounced neurocentric bias among neuroscientists. Some of this bias reflects a paucity of knowledge and tools available to study glia. However, this view is rapidly changing as new tools, model systems (culture and genetic), and technologies have permitted investigators to show that glia actively sculpt and modulate neuronal properties and functions in many ways. Glia have been thought to outnumber neurons by 10:1, although more recent studies suggest the ratio in the human brain is closer to 1:1 with region-specific differences (1). There are many different types of glia, some of which are specific to the central nervous system (CNS),¹ whereas others are found only in the peripheral nervous system (PNS). The main types of CNS glia include astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, ependymal cells, radial glia, and microglia. In the PNS, the main glial cells are Schwann cells, satellite cells, and enteric glia. These cells differ and are classified according to their morphologies, distinct anatomical locations in the nervous system, functions, developmental origins, and unique molecular compositions. Among the different classes of glia there are additional subclasses that reflect further degrees of specialization. In this review, I will discuss the characteristics and functions of the major glial cell types including astrocytes, microglia, and the myelin-forming oligodendrocytes (CNS) and Schwann cells (PNS). Because of space limitations, it is impossible to give a complete accounting of all glia and what is known about each of these cell types. Therefore, I encourage the interested reader to refer to some of the many excellent reviews referenced below that focus on individual glial cell types. Finally, I will discuss proteomic studies of glial cell function and some of the unique challenges investigators face when working with these cells.     

Embryonic expression of Drosophila ceramide synthase schlank in developing gut, CNS and PNS

Schlank is a member of the highly conserved ceramide synthase family and controls growth and body fat in Drosophila. Ceramide synthases are key enzymes in the sphingolipid de novo synthesis pathway. Ceramide synthase proteins and the (dihydro)ceramide produced are involved in a variety of biological processes among them apoptosis and neurodegeneration. The full extent of their involvement in these processes will require a precise analysis of the distribution and expression pattern of ceramide synthases. Paralogs of the ceramide synthase family have been found in all eukaryotes studied, however the mRNA and protein expression patterns have not yet been analysed systematically. In this study, we use antibodies that specifically recognize Schlank, a schlank mRNA probe and an endogenous schlank promoter driven LacZ reporter line to reveal the expression pattern of Schlank throughout embryogenesis. We found that Schlank is expressed in all embryonic epithelia during embryogenesis including the developing epidermis and the gastrointestinal tract. In addition, Schlank is upregulated in the developing central (CNS) and peripheral nervous system (PNS). Co-staining experiments with neuronal and glial markers revealed specific expression of Schlank in glial and neuronal cells of the CNS and PNS.     

Embryonic development of glial cells and myelin in the shark,Chiloscyllium punctatum

Glial cells are responsible for a wide range of functions in the nervous system of vertebrates. The myelinated nervous systems of extant elasmobranchs have the longest independent history of all gnathostomes. Much is known about the development of glia in other jawed vertebrates, but research in elasmobranchs is just beginning to reveal the mechanisms guiding neurodevelopment. This study examines the development of glial cells in the bamboo shark, Chiloscyllium punctatum, by identifying the expression pattern of several classic glial and myelin proteins. We show for the first time that glial development in the bamboo shark (C. punctamum) embryo follows closely the one observed in other vertebrates and that neural development seems to proceed at a faster rate in the PNS than in the CNS. In addition, we observed more myelinated tracts in the PNS than in the CNS, and as early as stage 32, suggesting that the ontogeny of myelin in sharks is closer to osteichthyans than agnathans.     

CNS midline cells influence the division and survival of lateral glia in the Drosophila nervous system

Central nervous system (CNS) midline cells are essential for identity determination and differentiation of neurons in the Drosophila nervous system. It is not clear, however, whether CNS midline cells are also involved in the development of lateral glial cells. The roles of CNS midline cells in lateral glia development were elucidated using general markers for lateral glia, such as glial cell missing and reverse polarity, and specific enhancer trap lines labeling the longitudinal, A, B, medial cell body, peripheral, and exit glia. We found that CNS midline cells were necessary for the proper expression of glial cell missing, reverse polarity, and other lateral glia markers only during the later stages of development, suggesting that they are not required for initial identity determination. Instead, CNS midline cells appear to be necessary for proper division and survival of lateral glia. CNS midline cells were also required for proper positioning of three exit glia at the junction of segmental and intersegmental nerves, as well as some peripheral glia along motor and sensory axon pathways. This study demonstrated that CNS midline cells are extrinsically required for the proper division, migration, and survival of various classes of lateral glia from the ventral neuroectoderm.     

Physiological Notch signaling promotes gliogenesis in the developing peripheral and central nervous systems

Constitutive activation of the Notch pathway can promote gliogenesis by peripheral (PNS) and central (CNS) nervous system progenitors. This raises the question of whether physiological Notch signaling regulates gliogenesis in vivo. To test this, we conditionally deleted Rbpsuh (Rbpj) from mouse PNS or CNS progenitors using Wnt1-Cre or Nestin-Cre. Rbpsuh encodes a DNA-binding protein (RBP/J) that is required for canonical signaling by all Notch receptors. In most regions of the developing PNS and spinal cord, Rbpsuh deletion caused only mild defects in neurogenesis, but severe defects in gliogenesis. These resulted from defects in glial specification or differentiation, not premature depletion of neural progenitors, because we were able to culture undifferentiated progenitors from the PNS and spinal cord despite their failure to form glia in vivo. In spinal cord progenitors, Rbpsuh was required to maintain Sox9 expression during gliogenesis, demonstrating that Notch signaling promotes the expression of a glial-specification gene. These results demonstrate that physiological Notch signaling is required for gliogenesis in vivo, independent of the role of Notch in the maintenance of undifferentiated neural progenitors.     

Comparison of the generic neuronal differentiation and neuron subtype specification functions of mammalian achaete-scute and atonal homologs in cultured neural progenitor cells

In the vertebrate peripheral nervous system, the proneural genes neurogenin 1 and neurogenin 2 (Ngn1 and Ngn2), and Mash1 are required for sensory and autonomic neurogenesis, respectively. In cultures of neural tube-derived, primitive PNS progenitors NGNs promote expression of sensory markers and MASH1 that of autonomic markers. These effects do not simply reflect enhanced neuronal differentiation, suggesting that both bHLH factors also specify neuronal identity like their Drosophila counterparts. At high concentrations of BMP2 or in neural crest stem cells (NCSCs), however, NGNs like MASH1 promote only autonomic marker expression. These data suggest that that the identity specification function of NGNs is more sensitive to context than is that of MASH1. In NCSCs, MASH1 is more sensitive to Notch-mediated inhibition of neurogenesis and cell cycle arrest, than are the NGNs. Thus, the two proneural genes differ in other functional properties besides the neuron subtype identities they can promote. These properties may explain cellular differences between MASH1- and NGN-dependent lineages in the timing of neuronal differentiation and cell cycle exit.     

A requirement for Notch in the genesis of a subset of glial cells in the Drosophila embryonic central nervous system which arise through asymmetric divisions

In the Drosophila central nervous system (CNS) glial cells are known to be generated from glioblasts, which produce exclusively glia or neuroglioblasts that bifurcate to produce both neuronal and glial sublineages. We show that the genesis of a subset of glial cells, the subperineurial glia (SPGs), involves a new mechanism and requires Notch. We demonstrate that the SPGs share direct sibling relationships with neurones and are the products of asymmetric divisions. This mechanism of specifying glial cell fates within the CNS is novel and provides further insight into regulatory interactions leading to glial cell fate determination. Furthermore, we show that Notch signalling positively regulates glial cells missing (gcm) expression in the context of SPG development.     

Regulatory interactions during early neurogenesis in Drosophila

During neurogenesis in Drosophila, ectodermal cells are endowed with the capacity to become neuronal precursors. Following their selection, these cells initiate neuronal lineage development and differentiation. The processes of neuronal precursor specification and neuronal lineage development require the activities of several groups of genes functioning in a complex, hierarchical regulatory network. Whereas the proneural genes promote neurogenic potential, neurogenic genes restrict the acquisition of this identity to a subset of ectodermal cells. Following their selection, these cells express the pan neural neuronal precursor genes and a set of neuronal lineage identity genes. While lineage identity genes allow the various lineages to acquire specific identities, neuronal precursor genes presumably regulate functional and developmental characteristics common to all neuronal precursor cells. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Progesterone as a neurosteroid: synthesis and actions in rat glial cellsProceedings of Xth International Congress on Hormonal Steroids, Quebec, Canada, 17–21 June 1998.

The central nervous system (CNS) and the peripheral nervous system (PNS) are targets for steroid hormones where they regulate important neuronal functions. Some steroid hormones are synthesized within the nervous system, either de novo from cholesterol, or by the metabolism of precursors originating from the circulation, and they were termed ‘neurosteroids'. The sex steroid progesterone can also be considered as a neurosteroid since its synthesis was demonstrated in rat glial cell cultures of the CNS (oligodendrocytes and astrocytes) and of the PNS (Schwann cells). Both types of glial cells express steroid hormone receptors, ER, GR and PR. As in target tissue, e.g. the uterus, PR is estrogen-inducible in brain glial cell cultures. In the PNS, similar PR-induction could not be seen in pure Schwann cells derived from sciatic nerves. However, a significant PR-induction by estradiol was demonstrated in Schwann cells cocultured with dorsal root ganglia (DRG), and we will present evidence that neuronal signal(s) are required for this estrogen-mediated PR-induction. Progesterone has multiple effects on glial cells, it influences growth, differentiation and increases the expression of myelin-specific proteins in oligodendrocytes, and potentiates the formation of new myelin sheaths by Schwann cells in vivo. Progesterone and progesterone analogues also promotes myelination of DRG-Neurites in tissue culture, strongly suggesting a role for this neurosteroid in myelinating processes in the CNS and in the PNS.     

Nucleoside diphosphate kinase Nm23-M1 involves in oligodendroglial versus neuronal cell fate decision in vitro

The adult glial progenitor cells were recently shown to be able to produce neurons in central nervous system (CNS) and to become multipotent in vitro. Although the fate decision of glial progenitors was studied extensively, the signals and factors which regulate the timing of neuronal differentiation still remain unknown. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying the neuronal differentiation from glial progenitors, we modified the gene expression profile in NG2⁺ glial progenitor cells using enhanced retroviral mutagen (ERM) technique followed by phenotype screening to identify possible gene(s) responsible for glial-neuronal cell fate determination. Among the identified molecules, we found the gene named non-metastatic cell 1 which encodes a nucleoside diphosphate kinase protein A (Nm23-M1 or NME1). So far, the Nm23 members have been shown to be involved in various molecular processes including tumor metastasis, cell proliferation, differentiation and cell fate determination. In the present study, we provide evidence suggesting the role of NME1 in glial-neuronal cell fate determination in vitro. We showed that NME1 is widely expressed in neuronal structures throughout adult mouse CNS. Our immunohistochemical results revealed that NME1 is strongly colocalized with NF200 through white matter of spinal cord and brain. Interestingly, NME1 overexpression in oligodendrocyte progenitor OLN-93 cells potently induced the acquisition of neuronal fate, while its silencing was shown to promote oligodendrocyte differentiation. Furthermore, we demonstrated that dual-functional role of NME1 is achieved through cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA). Our data therefore suggested that NME1 acts as a switcher or reprogramming factor which involves in oligodentrocyte versus neuron cell fate specification in vitro.     

Distinct mechanisms triggering glial differentiation in Drosophila thoracic and abdominal neuroblasts 6-4

Neurons and glia are produced in stereotyped patterns after neuroblast cell division during development of the Drosophila central nervous system. The first cell division of thoracic neuroblast 6-4 (NB6-4T) is asymmetric, giving rise to a glial precursor cell and a neuronal precursor cell. In contrast, abdominal NB6-4 (NB6-4A) divides symmetrically to produce two glial cells. To understand the relationship between cell division and glia-neuron cell fate determination, we examined and compared the effects of known cell division mutations on the NB6-4T and NB6-4A lineages. Based on observation of expression of glial fate determination and early glial differentiation genes, the onset of glial differentiation occurred in NB6-4A but not in NB6-4T when both cell cycle progression and cytokinesis were genetically arrested. On the other hand, glial differentiation started in both lineages when cytokinesis was blocked with intact cell cycle progression. These results showed that NB6-4T, but not NB6-4A, requires cell cycle progression for acquisition of glial fate, suggesting that distinct mechanisms trigger glial differentiation in the different lineages.