基于模式识别受体和人工设计诱饵蛋白扩展植物识别特异性

病原/微生物相关分子模式(PAMPs/MAMPs)被位于宿主细胞表面的模式识别受体(PRRs)识别并激活免疫反应.这种病原相关分子模式触发的免疫反应(PTI)能够帮助植物抵抗大部分致病微生物的侵入,因此利用基因工程技术在植物中表达PRRs,以增强植物对病原微生物的免疫识别是一种非常有潜力的植物抗病性改良的策略.植物病原微生物分泌的效应蛋白通常利用多种多样的生化机制直接靶向和抑制PTI信号通路的关键组分,从而抑制PTI.一些植物进化出与效应蛋白的靶标类似的诱饵蛋白,并诱导效应蛋白的错误靶向.这种识别的结果不抑制PTI免疫反应,反而诱导效应蛋白激活的免疫反应(ETI).这种机制提示了人工设计的诱饵蛋白在特定植物中产生新的识别特异性的可能性.本综述总结了PRRs对PAMPs的识别,以及诱饵蛋白对效应蛋白监控方面的研究进展.利用转基因异源表达EFR或PBS1诱饵蛋白在实验室条件下成功扩展了植物的识别特异性,体现了对PRRs和人工设计的诱饵蛋白在植物对病原识别特异性的扩展和抗病性改良方面的潜力,突显了分离和鉴定新的PRRs和诱饵蛋白的必要性.     

寄主植物与病原菌免疫反应的分子遗传基础

近年来,大量的植物抗病基因和病原菌无毒基因被克隆,抗病基因和无毒基因的结构、功能及其互作关系的研究也取得重大进展。在植物中,由病原菌模式分子(pathogen-associated molecular patterns, PAMPs)引发的免疫反应(PAMP-triggered immunity, PTI)和由效应因子引发的免疫反应(effector-triggered immunity, ETI)是植物在长期进化过程中形成的两类抵抗病原物的机制。PTI反应主要通过细胞表面受体(patternrecognition receptors, PRRs)识别并结合PAMPs从而激活下游免疫反应,而在ETI反应中,则通过植物R基因(resistance gene,R)与病原菌无毒基因(avirulence gene, Avr)产物间的直接或间接相互作用来完成免疫反应。本文对植物PTI反应和ETI反应分别进行了概述,重点探讨了植物R基因与病原菌Avr基因之间的互作遗传机理,并对目前植物抗性分子遗传机制研究和抗病育种中的问题进行了探讨和展望。     

《Molecular Plant》文章中文摘要 2010年第3卷第5期

（http：//mplant.oxfordjournals.org/content/vol3/issue5/index.dtl）1 Zhang J,Zhou JM（2010）.Plant immumty triggered by microbial molecular signatures.Mol Plant,3（5）：783～793题目：微生物分子特征激活的植物免疫（综述）摘要：病原体/微生物相关分子模式（pathogen/microbe-associated molecular patterns,PAMPs/MAMPs）被位于宿主细胞表面的模式识别受体（pattern-recognition receptors,PRRs）识别来激活植物免疫。病原相关分子模式诱导的免疫反应（PAMP-triggered immunity,PTI）是植物限制病原菌增殖的第一层防卫反应。PTI信号传导元件往往被多种Pseudomonas syringae毒性效应蛋白作为攻击靶点,     

模式识别受体的胞内转运及其在植物免疫中的作用

植物利用细胞表面模式识别受体(PRRs)来感知病原相关分子模式(PAMPs), 进而触发自身的免疫反应(PTI)。在植物免疫过程中, PRRs在细胞内的正确定位对其生理功能的发挥至关重要。PRRs蛋白可以在内质网(ER)上合成, 并通过胞吐被分泌到质膜(PM)上。此外, PRRs蛋白也可以通过胞吞进行胞内循环或降解。细胞可以通过胞内转运降解PRRs蛋白以终止信号转导, 也可以通过形成胞内体进行信号传递。该文概述了PRRs蛋白及其配体的研究进展以及PRRs蛋白的胞内转运在植物免疫中的重要作用。     

模式识别受体的胞内转运及其在植物免疫中的作用

植物利用细胞表面模式识别受体(PRRs)来感知病原相关分子模式(PAMPs),进而触发自身的免疫反应(PTI)。在植物免疫过程中,PRRs在细胞内的正确定位对其生理功能的发挥至关重要。PRRs蛋白可以在内质网(ER)上合成,并通过胞吐被分泌到质膜(PM)上。此外, PRRs蛋白也可以通过胞吞进行胞内循环或降解。细胞可以通过胞内转运降解PRRs蛋白以终止信号转导,也可以通过形成胞内体进行信号传递。该文概述了PRRs蛋白及其配体的研究进展以及PRRs蛋白的胞内转运在植物免疫中的重要作用。     

参与植物天然免疫的LRR型蛋白

植物含有多种富含亮氨酸重复序列(LRRs)结构的蛋白质,它们在植物天然免疫中发挥着重要作用。参与植物防御反应的LRR型蛋白家族包括:类受体蛋白激酶、抗病基因编码蛋白质、多聚半乳糖醛酸酶抑制蛋白和伸展蛋白家族。最近,人们发现植物免疫系统包含:病原相关分子模式(PAMP)激发的免疫性(PTI),即类受体蛋白激酶识别病原菌PAMPs,启动植物防卫反应;病原菌效应子激发的免疫性(ETI),即抗病基因编码蛋白质识别效应子,启动植物防卫反应。除此之外,细胞壁是植物细胞的天然保护屏障。多聚半乳糖醛酸酶抑制蛋白和伸展蛋白通过维护细胞壁,抵御病原菌入侵。我们综述了植物中LRRs蛋白的结构特征与不同种类的LRR蛋白介导免疫反应的分子机制,讨论了LRR型蛋白在植物免疫过程中的意义及存在的问题,指出搜寻配体和下游信号分子将是LRR型蛋白研究热点。     

两类免疫受体强强联手筑牢植物免疫防线

植物先天免疫系统在抵御病原菌入侵过程中发挥至关重要的作用, 主要包括两个层次, 即病原菌相关分子模式和效应因子分别触发的PTI和ETI免疫反应。PTI和ETI分别由植物细胞膜表面模式识别受体(PRRs)和胞内免疫受体(NLRs)激活, 具有特异的激活机制, 但是两者激活的下游免疫事件相互重叠。PTI和ETI是否为泾渭分明的两道防线, 以及ETI与PTI下游事件为何如此相似, 一直是植物免疫领域最受关注的问题之一。最近, 中国科学院分子植物科学卓越创新中心辛秀芳团队与合作者利用拟南芥(Arabidopsis thaliana)与丁香假单胞杆菌(Pseudomonas syringae)互作系统对PTI和ETI在机制上的联系进行了研究。他们发现PRRs和共受体参与ETI, 而活性氧的产生是联系PRRs和NLRs所介导的免疫早期信号事件。他们还发现NLRs信号能够迅速增强PTI关键因子的转录和蛋白水平, PTI的增强在ETI免疫反应中不可或缺。该研究从机制上解析了植物免疫领域中长期悬而未决的PTI与ETI相似性之谜, 是该领域的一项突破性进展, 为未来作物分子设计育种提供了新的启示。     

水稻免疫机制研究进展

植物先天免疫主要由两部分组成：一类是通过细胞膜上的病原菌分子模式识别受体识别病原微生物表面存在的分子特征激发的免疫反应（PTI）;另一类是专化性的抗病R蛋白识别病原微生物的效应蛋白,从而激发下游的病原菌小种特异性的防卫反应过程（ETI）．随着水稻抗病信号途径中越来越多的抗病基因以及关键的调控基因被克隆和功能鉴定,同时多种水稻病原菌效应蛋白的发现,水稻抗病机理的研究也越来越深入．本文阐述了水稻的PTI,ETI及其下游参与免疫信号转导的关键性组分,从而形成一个初步的水稻免疫调控网络．     

植物免疫受体FLS2的胞内运输机制

植物通过细胞表面的模式识别受体(PRRs)识别病原相关分子模式(PAMPs),启动植物免疫的第一道防线(PTI).拟南芥FLS2是第一个被发现的植物PRR,近年来围绕FLS2开展了大量的工作,相关研究成果已成为植物与病原微生物互作的重要理论基础.在真核细胞中,细胞膜受体从产生到降解经过了一系列的胞内运输过程,膜受体的胞...     

LysM蛋白介导植物免疫防卫反应及其信号激发的研究进展

溶解素基序(LysM)是一类普遍存在于大多数有机体中的蛋白质结构域。植物细胞中含有LysM结构域的蛋白能够识别不同种类含有N-乙酰葡糖胺结构的配体分子,从而启动植物对病原菌的特异防御反应。作为一种重要的模式识别受体,LysM结构域蛋白通过不同形式的寡聚化、受体类胞质激酶BIK1和MAPK级联反应向下游传递信号,而病原菌能够通过其分泌的效应蛋白特异性识别或修饰模式识别受体,规避植物细胞中病原体相关分子模式诱导的免疫反应。该文主要综述受体激酶/蛋白在病原菌激发子识别和防卫反应启动中的作用。     

The LysM receptor kinase CERK1 mediates bacterial perception in Arabidopsis

Plants use pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) to perceive pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMPs) and initiate defence responses. PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) plays an important role in general resistance, and constrains the growth of most microbes on plants. Despite the importance of PRRs in plant immunity, the vast majority of them remain to be identified. We recently showed that the Arabidopsis LysM receptor kinase CERK1 is required not only for chitin signalling and fungal resistance, but plays an essential role in restricting bacterial growth on plants. We proposed that CERK1 may mediate the perception of a bacterial PAMP, or an endogenous plant cell wall component released during infection, through its extracellular carbohydrate-binding LysM-motifs. Here we report reduced activation of a PAMP-induced defence response on plants lacking the CERK1 gene after treatment with crude bacterial extracts. This demonstrates that CERK1 mediates perception of an unknown bacterial PAMP in Arabidopsis.Key words: PAMP, PRR, PTI, LysM, chitin, bacteria, carbohydrate     

Expansion of pathogen recognition specificity in plants using pattern recognition receptors and artificially designed decoys

Pathogen/microbe-associated molecular patterns(PAMPs/MAMPs) are recognized by plant pattern recognition receptors(PRRs)localized on the cell surface to activate immune responses.This PAMP-triggered immunity(PTI) confers resistance to a broad range of pathogenic microbes and,therefore,has a great potential for genetically engineering broad-spectrum resistance by transferring PRRs across plant families.Pathogenic effectors secreted by phytopathogens often directly target and inhibit key components of PTI signaling pathways via diverse biochemical mechanisms.In some cases,plants have evolved to produce decoy proteins that mimic the direct virulence target,which senses the biochemical activities of pathogenic effectors.This kind of perception traps the effectors of erroneous targeting and results in the activation of effector-triggered immunity(ETI) instead of suppressing PTI.This mechanism suggests that artificially designed decoy proteins could be used to generate new recognition specificities in a particular plant.In this review,we summarize recent advances in research investigating PAMP recognition by PRRs and virulence effector surveillance by decoy proteins.Successful expansion of recognition specificities,conferred by the transgenic expression of EF-Tu receptor(EFR) and AvrPphB susceptible 1(PBS1) decoys,has highlighted the considerable potential of PRRs and artificially designed decoys to expand plant resistance spectra and the need to further identify novel PRRs and decoys.     

Receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases are pivotal components in pattern recognition receptor-mediated signaling in plant immunity

Innate immunity is generally initiated with recognition of conserved pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). PAMPs are perceived by pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), leading to activation of a series of immune responses, including the expression of defense genes, ROS production and activation of MAP kinase. Recent progress has indicated that receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases (RLCKs) are directly activated by ligand- activated PRRs and initiate pattern -triggered immunity (PTI) in both Arabidopsis and rice. To suppress PTI, pathogens inhibit the RLCKs by many types of effectors, including AvrAC, AvrPphB and Xoo1488. In this review, we summarize recent advances in RLCK-mediated PTI in plants.     

The Arabidopsis leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinases BAK1/SERK3 and BKK1/SERK4 are required for innate immunity to hemibiotrophic and biotrophic pathogens

Recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by surface-localized pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) constitutes an important layer of innate immunity in plants. The leucine-rich repeat (LRR) receptor kinases EF-TU RECEPTOR (EFR) and FLAGELLIN SENSING2 (FLS2) are the PRRs for the peptide PAMPs elf18 and flg22, which are derived from bacterial EF-Tu and flagellin, respectively. Using coimmunoprecipitation and mass spectrometry analyses, we demonstrated that EFR and FLS2 undergo ligand-induced heteromerization in planta with several LRR receptor-like kinases that belong to the SOMATIC-EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE (SERK) family, including BRASSINOSTEROID INSENSITIVE1-ASSOCIATED KINASE1/SERK3 (BAK1/SERK3) and BAK1-LIKE1/SERK4 (BKK1/SERK4). Using a novel bak1 allele that does not exhibit pleiotropic defects in brassinosteroid and cell death responses, we determined that BAK1 and BKK1 cooperate genetically to achieve full signaling capability in response to elf18 and flg22 and to the damage-associated molecular pattern AtPep1. Furthermore, we demonstrated that BAK1 and BKK1 contribute to disease resistance against the hemibiotrophic bacterium Pseudomonas syringae and the obligate biotrophic oomycete Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis. Our work reveals that the establishment of PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI) relies on the rapid ligand-induced recruitment of multiple SERKs within PRR complexes and provides insight into the early PTI signaling events underlying this important layer of plant innate immunity.     

Negative control of BAK1 by protein phosphatase 2A during plant innate immunity

Recognition of pathogen‐associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) by surface‐localized pattern‐recognition receptors (PRRs) activates plant innate immunity, mainly through activation of numerous protein kinases. Appropriate induction of immune responses must be tightly regulated, as many of the kinases involved have an intrinsic high activity and are also regulated by other external and endogenous stimuli. Previous evidences suggest that PAMP‐triggered immunity (PTI) is under constant negative regulation by protein phosphatases but the underlying molecular mechanisms remain unknown. Here, we show that protein Ser/Thr phosphatase type 2A (PP2A) controls the activation of PRR complexes by modulating the phosphostatus of the co‐receptor and positive regulator BAK1. A potential PP2A holoenzyme composed of the subunits A1, C4, and B’η/ζ inhibits immune responses triggered by several PAMPs and anti‐bacterial immunity. PP2A constitutively associates with BAK1 in planta. Impairment in this PP2A‐based regulation leads to increased steady‐state BAK1 phosphorylation, which can poise enhanced immune responses. This work identifies PP2A as an important negative regulator of plant innate immunity that controls BAK1 activation in surface‐localized immune receptor complexes.     

Plant systems for recognition of pathogen-associated molecular patterns

Research of the last decade has revealed that plant immunity consists of different layers of defense that have evolved by the co-evolutional battle of plants with its pathogens. Particular light has been shed on PAMP- (pathogen-associated molecular pattern) triggered immunity (PTI) mediated by pattern recognition receptors. Striking similarities exist between the plant and animal innate immune system that point for a common optimized mechanism that has evolved independently in both kingdoms. Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) from both kingdoms consist of leucine-rich repeat receptor complexes that allow recognition of invading pathogens at the cell surface. In plants, PRRs like FLS2 and EFR are controlled by a co-receptor SERK3/BAK1, also a leucine-rich repeat receptor that dimerizes with the PRRs to support their function. Pathogens can inject effector proteins into the plant cells to suppress the immune responses initiated after perception of PAMPs by PRRs via inhibition or degradation of the receptors. Plants have acquired the ability to recognize the presence of some of these effector proteins which leads to a quick and hypersensitive response to arrest and terminate pathogen growth.     

Plant pattern recognition receptor complexes at the plasma membrane

A key feature of innate immunity is the ability to recognize and respond to potential pathogens in a highly sensitive and specific manner. In plants, the activation of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) by pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) elicits a defense programme known as PAMP-triggered immunity (PTI). Although only a handful of PAMP-PRR pairs have been defined, all known PRRs are modular transmembrane proteins containing ligand-binding ectodomains. It is becoming clear that PRRs do not act alone but rather function as part of multi-protein complexes at the plasma membrane. Recent studies describing the molecular interactions and protein modifications that occur between PRRs and their regulatory proteins have provided important mechanistic insight into how plants avoid infection and achieve immunity.