An introduction to provisional stenting

Provisional or conditional stenting should be defined as the use of stents limited to those conditions and cases in which the operator, despite an aggressive balloon angioplasty technique with large balloons and high pressure, has been unable to obtain a result that ensures optimal chances of early and late patency. The paramount issue is how to discriminate the patients with optimal results after balloon angioplasty for whom additional stent implantation is unlikely to improve or may even worsen long-term outcome. The better results of elective stent implantation in the OPUS study suggest that visual assessment of the PTCA result is not sufficient to detect lesions with suboptimal lumen gain after PTCA. The addition of physiologic parameters (Doppler flow velocity measurements, fractional flow reserve) has improved the results of the provisional stent group, with the best outcome observed when complex lesions and multivessel treatment were included in these studies (FROST, DESTINI). Intravascular ultrasound, although more expensive and time-consuming, has the additional advantage to guide the dilatation strategy.     

Provisional stenting in the real world: results in 1058 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary angioplasty

OBJECTIVE: To study a strategy of aggressive coronary balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting in allcomers. In randomized trials, stenting has improved the outcome of patients undergoing coronary intervention. However, whether these results hold up in clinical practice is largely unknown. Furthermore, the results of balloon angioplasty have also improved dramatically. It is therefore essential to evaluate the current results of balloon angioplasty and to assess whether stents are required in all patients. METHODS: The authors prospectively studied the occurrence of death, myocardial infarction (MI) and target lesion revascularization (TLR) of a large consecutive group of patients undergoing aggressive balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting. None of the patients received a platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocker. The results were compared with the outcome of routine stenting in recent randomized trials. RESULTS: Angioplasty was performed in 1058 patients of whom 369 (34.9%) received a stent. The angiographic success rate was 98.9%. During hospital stay, 4.8% of the patients suffered any cardiac event. At one-year follow-up, death occurred in 1.1%, MI in 3.3%, TLR in 12.4% and any event in 16.7% of the patients. Event-free survival at one-year was 82.3%. These results compare favorably with routine stenting in recent trials. CONCLUSIONS: Aggressive balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting yields excellent results in a general patient population.     

Provisional stenting in small vessels

Based on the currently available data, the strategy of routine stent placement in unselected lesions located in small coronary arteries provides good immediate results but is still associated with a high incidence of in-stent restenosis. Randomized trials comparing elective stenting with balloon angioplasty have not provided the demonstration that routine stenting is the best strategy for percutaneous intervention in coronary arteries with a reference diameter smaller than 2.75-3.0 mm. This paper describes the rationale for provisional stenting in this clinical setting and reviews the role of quantitative coronary angiography, intracoronary ultrasound and intracoronary Doppler measurements in the identification of lesions that would benefit from adjunctive stent placement after balloon angioplasty and in guiding stent implantation.     

Long-term comparison of balloon angioplasty with provisional stenting versus routine stenting in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome

Background. In patients with unstable angina or non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) who are eligible for PCI, routine stenting is the recommended treatment strategy, based on the opinion of experts. Provisional stenting may provide a viable alternative by retaining the early benefits of stenting without its potential late hazards. Method. Patients with NSTE-ACS were randomised to provisional or routine stenting after coronary angiography. Patients were followed for up to ten years. The occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was recorded. Results. 237 consecutive patients with NSTE-ACS were randomly assigned to routine stenting (n=116) or provisional stenting (n=121). No difference in the incidence of MACE at 30 days was observed. At six months, angiographic restenosis was lower in the routine stenting group (41 vs. 20%, p=0.02), paralleled by more MACE in the provisional stenting group at one year (40.5 vs. 27.6%, p=0.036). At complete follow-up the difference in MACE was not significant (61.2 vs. 50%, p=0.084) because of relatively more target lesion revascularisations in the routine stent group. There was no difference in the incidence of very late stent thrombosis (1.7 vs. 3.4%, p=0.439). The only independent predictor of MACE was β-blocker use (RR 0.62 [0.431; 0.892] p=0.010). Conclusion. In selective patients with NSTE-ACS, routine stenting was more beneficial than provisional stenting for a period of up to five years, driven by a reduction in repeat revascularisation procedures. After this period, the benefit was no longer significant. Beta-blocker use was the only independent predictor of MACE throughout the complete follow-up period. (Neth Heart J 2010;18:307-313.)     

Coronary pressure and FFR predict long-term outcome after PTCA

Although coronary stents have been the most important improvement in percutaneous coronary interventions in the last 10 years, it is well known to interventionalists that many patients after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) have a favourable outcome without stenting. Coronary angiography, however, is not sensitive enough to identify those particular patients and it has been suggested that a combination of angiographic and functional criteria would be more suitable to distinguish patients with a low restenosis chance after plain balloon angioplasty. In the present study, the authors investigated the value of coronary pressure measurement for conditional stenting in 85 patients. It was demonstrated that in patients in whom a high fractional flow reserve (FFR) was present (> 0.90), the incidence of coronary events at two-year follow-up was almost three times lower than in those patients with an FFR below 0.90. Such high FFRs could be obtained in approximately 45% of all patients. In an additional group of patients, it was demonstrated by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies that the mechanism of a high FFR after plain balloon angioplasty is most likely the result of a larger lumen compared with patients with a suboptimal FFR. This means that, in patients in whom both the angiographic and the functional result after PTCA is optimal, a restenosis rate is achieved similar to that achieved by stenting. Obviously, in such patients, additional stenting and a number of problems in the long-term possibly related to stenting can be avoided. Therefore, coronary angiography and coronary pressure measurement have a complementary value in the evaluation of PTCA results and such information can be easily obtained by using a pressure wire instead of a regular guidewire.     

Intravascular-ultrasound-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty/provisional stent implantation strategy: impact on long-term clinical follow-up

Two hundred and eighty-four consecutive patients with 438 native coronary artery stenoses were enrolled prospectively in a study of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-guided percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) with provisional stenting: (1) aggressive lesion-site media-to-media balloon-sizing; (2) IVUS-assessment of residual lumen dimensions to identify optimal PTCA results (minimum lumen area = 65% of the average of the proximal and distal reference lumen areas or = 6.0 mm(2) and no major dissection); and (3) liberal stent crossover. Overall, 206 stenoses in 134 patients (47%) were treated with PTCA alone. Reasons for crossover were flow-limiting or lumen-compromising dissections in 28% of patients and suboptimal IVUS minimum lumen area in 72% of patients. At one year, 8% of stenoses in the PTCA group and 16% in the stent crossover group required revascularization. In approximately half of the patients treated using an IVUS-guided aggressive PTCA strategy, stent implantation could be avoided without sacrificing an increase in acute complications or worse clinical outcome.     

Early and long-term outcome of elective stenting of the infarct-related artery in patients with viability in the infarct-area: Rationale and design of the Viability-guided Angioplasty after acute Myocardial Infarction-trial (The VIAMI-trial)

BACKGROUND: Although percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is becoming the standard therapy in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), to date most patients, even in developed countries, are reperfused with intravenous thrombolysis or do not receive a reperfusion therapy at all. In the post-lysis period these patients are at high risk for recurrent ischemic events. Early identification of these patients is mandatory as this subgroup could possibly benefit from an angioplasty of the infarct-related artery.Since viability seems to be related to ischemic adverse events, we initiated a clinical trial to investigate the benefits of PCI with stenting of the infarct-related artery in patients with viability detected early after acute myocardial infarction. METHODS: The VIAMI-study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Patients who are hospitalized with an acute myocardial infarction and who did not have primary or rescue PCI, undergo viability testing by low-dose dobutamine echocardiography (LDDE) within 3 days of admission. Consequently, patients with demonstrated viability are randomized to an invasive or conservative strategy. In the invasive strategy patients undergo coronary angiography with the intention to perform PCI with stenting of the infarct-related coronary artery and concomitant use of abciximab. In the conservative group an ischemia-guided approach is adopted (standard optimal care).The primary end point is the composite of death from any cause, reinfarction and unstable angina during a follow-up period of three years. CONCLUSION: The primary objective of the VIAMI-trial is to demonstrate that angioplasty of the infarct-related coronary artery with stenting and concomitant use of abciximab results in a clinically important risk reduction of future cardiac events in patients with viability in the infarct-area, detected early after myocardial infarction.     

Provisional bifurcation stenting

Obstructive coronary lesions involving a branch origin or extending into the branch itself, remain one of the main challenges in the rapidly developing world of interventional cardiology. Acutely, these lesions are prone to the complications resulting in significant residual stenosis or loss of one of the branches. Long-term follow up has also been disappointing with a high incidence of restenosis. Numerous techniques have been developed, aimed at optimizing the acute and long-term results by adapting standard angioplasty hardware, with limited success, particularly in the long term. This article describes a fully dedicated system for bifurcation lesions with stenting of the main vessel to the main branch, yet ensuring side branch patency, with limited risk of branch origin stenosis or stent jailing, allowing for provisional stenting of the branch as dictated by the angiographic outcome.     

The effects of stenting on coronary endothelium from a molecular biological view: Time for improvement?

Coronary artery stenting following balloon angioplasty represents the gold standard in revascularization of coronary artery stenoses. However, stent deployment as well as percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) alone causes severe injury of vascular endothelium. The damaged endothelium is intrinsically repaired by locally derived endothelial cells and by circulating endothelial progenitor cells from the blood, leading to re‐population of the denuded regions within several weeks to months. However, the process of re‐endothelialization is often incomplete or dysfunctional, promoting in‐stent thrombosis and restenosis. The molecular and biomechanical mechanisms that influence the process of re‐endothelialization in stented segments are incompletely understood. Once the endothelium is restored, endothelial function might still be impaired. Several strategies have been followed to improve endothelial function after coronary stenting. In this review, the effects of stenting on coronary endothelium are outlined and current and future strategies to improve endothelial function after stent deployment are discussed.     

Drug-eluting stents: from bench to bed

The introduction of stents to clinical practice in 1987 was the major breakthrough in the field of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The use of stenting has drastically improved the outcomes of traditional PCI. First stents were approved for bailout and treatment of dissections, reducing dramatically the need for emergent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as a result of vessel closure during PCI. Later stents were proven to reduce the restenosis rate of PCI from 30%-40% with balloon angioplasty to 15%-20% with stents, primarily by eliminating elastic recoil and vascular remodeling as shown by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) studies. These outcomes have led to a wide acceptance of stenting as the strategy of choice for more than 80% of all PCI procedures performed. The current review focuses on the following topics: (1) strategies in drug selection to reduce neointimal proliferation, (2) stent designs and polymer selection as a platform for drug-eluting stents, (3) review of major preclinical and clinical experimental work performed in the field, and (4) a discussion of the potential and limitations of the technology.     

Long-term assessment of clinical parameters in patients with coronary heart disease after balloon angioplasty and stenting balloon angioplasty

The aim of this study was to assess clinical parameters in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) in the late period after balloon coronary angioplasty (BCA) and intracoronary stenting (ICS). The study included 104 patients who underwent repeated coronary angiography (CA) 2-10 months after successful coronary angioplasty. Clinical parameters were analyzed in 2 groups comparable at the moment of its performance in terms of major clinical characteristics. Group 1 comprised 51 patients following BCA and group 2 included 53 patients after ICS. Six months after the first procedure, repeated coronary angioplasty was performed in 19 (37.2%) and 6 (9.4%) patients after BCA and ICS, respectively (p < 0.05). Recurrent angina pectoris was observed in 42 patients from group 1 and in 25 ones from group 2, which was 82.3 and 47.2%, respectively (p < 0.05). Control CA revealed restenosis of the dilated artery in 22 (43.1%) of the 51 patients of group 1 and in 12 (22.6%) of the 53 patients of group 2. There were no differences between the groups in late postoperative bicycle ergometric and 24-hour ECG monitoring findings. The findings have led to the conclusion that implantation of a stent into the coronary artery greatly prolongs the antiischemic effect of coronary angioplasty and reduces a need for repeated endovascular intervention, which appears as lower incidence rates of restenosis and recurrent angina as compared to routine balloon angioplasty.     

Comparison of the results of stenting ans balloon angioplasty of coronary arteries in relation to the type of stenosis

Based on the comparison of the immediate and late results of stenting and balloon angioplasty (BA), the authors consider whether it is expedient to perform stenting of coronary arteries (CA) in all cases of BA in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) and different types of CA stenosis. The study included 410 patients: a group of stenting (n = 197) and a group of traditional BA (n = 213). All the patients in both groups were divided into four subgroups in relation to the type of detected stenosis according to the classification of the American Association of Cardiologists (ACC/AHA). The positive angiographic and clinical results were observed in all 197 patients after stenting. This was associated neither with the type of dilated stenosis nor with the design of an implanted stent. In dilation of types A and B1 stenoses, a stent-like result was significantly more frequently observed than in dilation of types B2 and C stenoses. There was no significant difference in the development of restenosis in patients after routine BA and stenting of types A and B1 stenoses. At the same time, after BA of types B2 and C stenoses, restenosis developed significantly more frequently than in stenting. Thus, on the basis of this study, it may be stated that the traditional BA yields the so-called stent-like result significantly more frequently in patients with uncomplicated forms of CA stenoses than in those with complicated ones. Once the stent-like result is achieved in patients with type A stenoses, stenting should not be performed since the latter fails to improve the immediate and late results of angioplasty. Despite that the stent-like result is achieved in patients with complicated forms of CA stenoses, it is expedient to make stenting. Our findings indicate that the obtained good immediate result reduces the incidence of restenosis.     

Direct stenting with 3000 i.u. heparin

In order to reduce vascular complications, the authors assessed safety and feasability of a new percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) strategy consisting of direct stenting with 3000 i.u. heparin and immediate sheath removal. Predicting factors of vascular complications during PTCA include heparin dosages, sheath dwell time and use of anti-glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa. A simplified PTCA with direct stenting technique may allow the use of very low doses of heparin without anti-GPIIb/IIIa in selected cases. From April 1999 to April 2000 all patients who underwent PTCA in the authors' center were screened. Exclusion criteria comprised a contraindication for direct stenting, primary PTCA for acute myocardial infarction (MI) and a TIMI (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) grade zero flow. All other patients were included. They received 3000 i.u. heparin before direct stenting whatever their current anticoagulation and their weight. The sheath was immediately removed using manual compression. Out of 716 consecutive PTCA patients, 171 (24%) were enrolled in the study (198 sites). Complete protocol was achieved in 150 patients (88%). Activated clotting time during the procedure was 179 +/- 32 seconds. No subacute thrombosis or creatine kinase elevation was observed before discharge. Only two uncomplicated groin hematomas and two false aneurysms (one surgical repair) were noted. This study shows that direct stenting with 3000 iu heparin is safe. Immediate sheath removal can be performed with a low rate of major vascular complications.     

Effects of bifurcation-specific and conventional stents on coronary bifurcation flow. An experimental and numerical study

Our paper builds on existing research into conventional bare metal stents in order to assess new devices specifically designed for coronary bifurcation angioplasty. The first aim is to validate the numerical model against data from in vitro experiments on stented coronary phantoms. A surface mesh was built in accordance with micro-computed tomography images obtained from coronary stents implanted in silicone models and used for numerical analysis. Computational simulations for steady and unsteady cases generally agreed with their experimental counterparts. A second objective is to compare the hemodynamic performance of one of these new devices (Stentys) to that of conventional devices and stenting techniques in a simplified coronary bifurcation model. Four different coronary bifurcation stenting techniques were analyzed. We have focused on factors contributing to restenosis, such as wall shear stress (WSS), oscillatory shear index (OSI), pressure loss, and local normalized helicity (LNH). It was found that bifurcation-specific stents implanted in the side branch led to increased malapposition. This effect has proved to be more important than stent specific design characteristics such as strut size (different for conventional and Stentys stent). This conclusion is confirmed by means of drop in pressure and mechanical energy loss rate calculation; for the latter, the increase ranged from 9% to 17%, depending on the stenting technique, when dedicated stents were implanted in the side branch. The behavior patterns presented in this study should be double-checked against those obtained in more realistic geometries.     

The role of acute wall recoil and late restenosis: results of the OCBAS trial (Optimal Coronary Balloon Angioplasty with Provisional Stenting versus Primary Stent)

Early deterioration of minimal luminal diameter immediately after PTCA, has been associated with an increase of late restenosis. Lesions with no early loss after PTCA have a low restenosis rate. Coronary stents reduce restenosis in lesions exhibiting early wall recoil. The purpose of the OCBAS study was to compare two strategies during coronary interventions; provision vs. elective stenting. 116 patients with good PTCA results were randomized to stent (n = 57) or to optimal PTCA (n = 59). After randomization in PTCA group, 13.5% of the patients crossed over to stent due to early loss (provisional stenting). Baseline demographic and angiographic characteristics were similar in both groups of patients. At 7.6 months, 96.6% of the entire population had a follow-up angiographic study; 98.2% in the stent and 94.9% in the PTCA group. Immediate and follow-up angiographic data showed that acute gain was significantly higher in the stent than in the PTCA group (1.95 vs. 1.5 mm; P < 0.03). However, late loss was significantly higher in the stent than the PTCA groups (0.63 +/- 0.59 vs. 0.26 +/- 0.44, respectively; P = 0.01). Hence, net gain with both techniques was similar (1.32 +/- 0.3 vs. 1.24 +/- 0.29 mm for the stent and PTCA groups respectively; P = NS). Angiographic restenosis rate at follow-up (19.2% in stent vs. 16.4% in PTCA; P = NS) and TVR (17.5 in stent vs. 13.5% in PTCA; P = NS) were also similar. Furthermore, event-free survival was 80.8% in the stent versus 83.1% in the PTCA group (P = NS). Overall costs (hospital and follow-up) were US$591,740 in the stent versus US$398,480 in the PTCA group (P < 0.02). The strategy of the PTCA with delay angiogram and provisional stent if early loss occurs, had similar restenosis rate and TVR than universal use of bare stents.     

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in elective percutaneous coronary intervention

Thrombosis plays a major role in acute vessel closure both after coronary balloon angioplasty and after stenting. This review will address the role of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy in preventing early thrombotic complications after percutaneous coronary intervention. The focus will be on agents that are routinely available and commonly used.     

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection: long stenting in a patient with polycythemia vera

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is a rare cause of myocardial ischemia or sudden cardiac death. We describe a patient with polycythemia vera and a chronic spontaneous coronary artery dissection who was treated with successful angioplasty and long stenting.     

Early results of endovascular treatment of chronic coronary occlusion in patients with ischemic heart disease

The early results of endovascular treatment of chronic coronary occlusion were studied. Immediate success rates were 67%. The factors that promote successful endovascular treatment in patients with this condition were as follows: less than 2-month disease duration, well-developed intersystemic collaterals, no "bridge" collaterals. Successful recanalization for chronic coronary occlusion improves the quality of life and bicycle ergometer test finding in patients, which reduces their needs of nitrates and beta-blockers. Coronary occlusion stenting yields better immediate angiographic results than does balloon angioplasty: residual stenosis and the minimum diameter of stenosis after stenting were 13.61 +/- 6.3% and 2.69 +/- 0.4 mm, respectively; those after balloon angioplasty were 23.1 +/- 8.1% and 2.31 +/- 0.37 mm, respectively.     

Reversal of slow flow phenomenon during primary stenting by bail-out administration of abciximab

BACKGROUND: Slow flow or no reflow phenomenon is increasingly being recognized as a serious problem during coronary angioplasty and stenting. This phenomenon is seen more often during angioplasty in highly thrombogenic milieux, especially in a setting of acute myocardial infarction. The treatment of this complication is often not satisfactory. In this study the authors assessed the efficacy of abciximab, a potent antiplatelet drug, in treating slow flow or no reflow phenomenon during primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS: Twenty-one instances of persistent slow flow phenomenon were encountered in 131 consecutive patients subjected to primary PTCA for AMI (16%). It was more common in patients presenting with AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock (nine of 21, 43%). Of these 21 cases of slow flow, 10 patients were given injection abciximab during the procedure of primary PTCA as a bail-out measure after encountering the complication of slow flow or no reflow. A pre-discharge coronary angiography was carried out in all patients who survived. RESULTS: In seven of 10 patients in the abciximab group flow had improved to TIMI-3. In contrast, in the non-abciximab group TIMI flow improved in only four of 11 patients. Patients with persistent slow flow had significantly higher mortality at the first 30-day follow-up than patients with TIMI-3 flow (33% versus 1.8%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: In this small nonrandomized study significant improvement in coronary flow was achieved by using intravenous abciximab after observing slow flow or no reflow phenomenon during primary PTCA. More frequent use of this drug in this milieu might help in preventing the development of this complication. Larger studies are warranted to confirm this life-saving beneficial effect of bail-out administration of abciximab during primary angioplasty.     

Oxidative stress in myocardial ischaemia reperfusion injury: a renewed focus on a long-standing area of heart research

Advances in the treatment of coronary artery disease have seen a significant drop in mortality and morbidity particularly amongst patients with acute myocardial infarction (MI). In particular, percutaneous trans-luminal balloon angioplasty (PTCA) with stenting to re-open atherosclerotic coronary arteries has yielded marked improvement in clinical outcome for patients with acute MI. Furthermore, with the advent of drug-eluting stents occurrence rates for coronary artery restenosis, one common clinical problem associated with angioplasty and stent deployment, have declined markedly. However, coronary restenosis in diabetic patients remains an on-going problem. The success of drug-eluting stents has seen a renewed focus on myocardial ischaemia reperfusion (IR) injury as this represents one area of research where many questions remain unanswered. In particular, the relationship between myocardial IR injury and decreased myocardial micro-vasculature re-flow post PTCA (that ultimately leads to poor clinical outcome and myocardial damage/dysfunction) is one area of research with the potential to decrease current complication rates further in patients suffering myocardial IR injury sustained during MI. This review discusses the role for oxidative stress, oxidant source(s) and both gene regulation and stem-cell therapy as potential strategic targets in the ischaemic myocardium, with the ultimate aim of providing significant cardioprotection in the setting of acute MI.