MDM2 binding induces a conformational change in p53 that is opposed by heat-shock protein 90 and precedes p53 proteasomal degradation

p53 protein conformation is an important determinant of its localization and activity. Changes in p53 conformation can be monitored by reactivity with wild-type conformation-specific (pAb-1620) or mutant conformation-specific (pAb-240) p53 antibodies. Wild-type p53 accumulated in a mutant (pAb-240 reactive) form when its proteasome-dependent degradation was blocked during recovery from stress treatment and in cells co-expressing p53 and MDM2. This suggests that conformational change precedes wild-type p53 degradation by the proteasome. MDM2 binding to the p53 N terminus could induce a conformational change in wild-type p53. Interestingly, this conformational change was opposed by heat-shock protein 90 and did not require the MDM2 RING-finger domain and p53 ubiquitination. Finally, ubiquitinated p53 accumulated in a pAb-240 reactive form when p53 degradation was blocked by proteasome inhibition, and a p53-ubiquitin fusion protein displayed a mutant-only conformation in MDM2-null cells. These results support a model in which MDM2 binding induces a conformational change that is opposed by heat-shock protein 90 and precedes p53 ubiquitination. The covalent attachment of ubiquitin may "lock" p53 in a mutant conformation in the absence of MDM2-binding and prior to its degradation by the proteasome.     

MDM2 protein-mediated ubiquitination of numb protein: identification of a second physiological substrate of MDM2 that employs a dual-site docking mechanism

The E3 ubiquitin ligase, MDM2, uses a dual-site mechanism to ubiquitinate and degrade the tumor suppressor protein p53, involving interactions with the N-terminal hydrophobic pocket and the acidic domain of MDM2. The results presented here demonstrate that MDM2 also uses this same dual-site mechanism to bind to the cell fate determinant NUMB with both the N-terminal hydrophobic pocket and the acidic domain of MDM2 also involved in forming the interaction with NUMB. Furthermore, the acidic domain interactions are crucial for MDM2-mediated ubiquitination of NUMB. Contrary to p53, where two separate domains form the interface with MDM2, only one region within the phosphotyrosine binding domain of NUMB (amino acids 113-148) mediates binding to both these regions of MDM2. By binding to both domains on MDM2, NUMB disrupts the MDM2-p53 complex and MDM2-catalyzed ubiquitination of p53. Therefore, we have identified the mechanism NUMB uses to regulate the steady-state levels of the p53 in cells. By targeting the acidic domain of MDM2 using acid domain-binding ligands we can overcome MDM2-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of NUMB impacting on the stabilization of p53 in cells. Furthermore, delivery of MDM2 acid domain-binding ligands to cancer cells promotes p53-dependent growth arrest and the induction of apoptosis. This highlights the dual-site mechanism of MDM2 on another physiological substrate and identifies the acid domain as well as N terminus as a potential target for small molecules that inhibit MDM2.     

MDM2 and promyelocytic leukemia antagonize each other through their direct interaction with p53

p53 can be regulated through post-translational modifications and through interactions with positive and negative regulatory factors. MDM2 binding inhibits p53 and promotes its degradation by the proteasome, whereas promyelocytic leukemia (PML) activates p53 by recruiting it to multiprotein complexes termed PML-nuclear bodies. We reported previously an in vivo and in vitro interaction between PML and MDM2 that is independent of p53. In the current study, we investigated whether interaction between MDM2 and PML can indirectly affect p53 activity. Increasing amounts of MDM2 inhibited p53 activation by PML but could not inhibit PML-mediated activation of a p53 fusion protein that lacked the MDM2-binding domain. Conversely, increasing amounts of PML could overcome p53 inhibition by MDM2 but could not overcome MDM2-mediated inhibition of a p53 fusion protein that lacked the PML-binding domain. These results demonstrate that MDM2 and PML can antagonize each other through their direct interaction with p53 and suggest the combined effects of MDM2 and PML on p53 function are determined by the relative level of each protein. Furthermore, these results imply that interactions between MDM2 and PML by themselves have little or no effect on p53 activity.     

Dual-site regulation of MDM2 E3-ubiquitin ligase activity

The control of p53 ubiquitination by MDM2 provides a model system to define how an E3-ligase functions on a conformationally flexible substrate. The mechanism of MDM2-mediated ubiquitination of p53 has been analyzed by deconstructing, in vitro, the MDM2-dependent ubiquitination reaction. Surprisingly, ligands binding to the hydrophobic cleft of MDM2 do not inhibit its E3-ligase function. However, peptides from within the DNA binding domain of p53 that bind the acid domain of MDM2 inhibit ubiquitination of p53, localizing a motif that harbors a key ubiquitination signal. The binding of ligands to the N-terminal hydrophobic cleft of MDM2 reactivates, in vitro and in vivo, MDM2-catalyzed ubiquitination of p53F19A, a mutant p53 normally refractory to MDM2-catalyzed ubiquitination. We propose a model in which the interaction between the p53-BOX-I domain and the N terminus of MDM2 promotes conformational changes in MDM2 that stabilize acid-domain interactions with a ubiquitination signal in the DNA binding domain of the p53 tetramer.     

Why is F19Ap53 unable to bind MDM2? Simulations suggest crack propagation modulates binding

Why doesn’t the F19A mutant of p53 bind to MDM2? Binding thermodynamics have suggested that the loss of packing interactions upon mutating Phe into Ala sidechain results in destabilizing the binding free energy between p53 and MDM2. Does this mutation also modulate the initial recognition between p53 and MDM2? We look at atomistic computer simulations of the process of the initial encounter between wild type p53 peptide and its F19A mutant with the N-terminal domain of MDM2. These simulations show that binding is characterized by a complex multistep process. It starts with the capture of F19 of wild type p53 by certain residues in the MDM2 binding pocket. This initial step anchors the peptide onto the surface of MDM2, and with the consequent reduction in the search space of the peptide, the peptide docks into the partially occluded surface of MDM2. This is similar to a crack forming in an otherwise occluded hydrophobic cavity in MDM2, and the peptide, docked through F19, modulates the propagation of this crack, which subsequently results in the stepwise docking of the rest of the peptide through insertions of W23 and L26. The lack of the bulky sidechain of F in the F19A mutant results in the absence of the initial “grasp” complex, and hence the mutant peptide diffuses randomly on the surface of MDM2 without binding. This is the first such demonstration of the possibility that a “kinetic” effect may partly underlie the destabilized thermodynamics of binding of F19A and is a feature that appears to be conserved in evolution. The observations by Wallace et al. (Mol Cell 2006; 23:251–63) that despite the inability of F19A to bind at the N-terminal domain of MDM2, it gets ubiquitinated, can now be partly understood based on a mechanism whereby the occupation of the binding pocket by ligands/peptides induces, via crack propagation and the dynamics of gatekeeper Y100, the ubiquitination signal for interactions between the acidic domain of MDM2 and the DNA binding domain of p53.     

Regulation of MDM2 E3 ligase activity by phosphorylation after DNA damage

MDM2 is a major regulator of p53 by acting as a ubiquitin E3 ligase. The central acidic domain and C-terminal RING domain of MDM2 are both indispensable for ubiquitination of p53. Our previous study suggested that ATM phosphorylation of MDM2 near the C terminus inhibits RING domain oligomerization, resulting in p53 stabilization after DNA damage. We present here evidence that these modifications allosterically regulate the functions of both acidic domain and RING domain of MDM2. Using chemical cross-linking, we show that the MDM2 RING domain forms oligomers including dimer and higher-order complexes in vivo. RING domain dimerization efficiency is negatively regulated by upstream sequence. ATM-mediated phosphorylation of the upstream sequence further inhibits RING dimerization. Forced oligomerization of MDM2 partially overcomes the inhibitory effect of phosphorylation and stimulates p53 ubiquitination. Furthermore, the ability of MDM2 acidic domain to bind p53 core domain and induce p53 misfolding are also suppressed by the same C-terminal ATM sites after DNA damage. These results suggest that the acidic domain and RING domain of MDM2 are both allosterically coupled to the intervening ATM sites, which enables the same modification to regulate multiple MDM2 functions critical for p53 ubiquitination.     

E2F1 inhibits MDM2 expression in a p53-dependent manner

MDM2 expression is down-regulated upon E2F1 over-expression, but the mechanism is not well defined. In the current study, we found that E2F1 inhibits MDM2 expression by suppressing its promoter activity. Although E2F1 binds to the MDM2 promoter, the inhibitory effect of E2F1 on the MDM2 promoter does not require the direct binding. We demonstrate that E2F1 inhibits MDM2 promoter activity in a p53-dependent manner. Knockdown of p53 in U2OS cells impairs the inhibitory effect of E2F1 on the MDM2 promoter. Consistent with this observation, E2F1 does not inhibit MDM2 promoter activity in p53-deficient H1299 cells, and the inhibition is restored when p53 is expressed exogenously. Both E2F1 and p53 are up-regulated after DNA damage stimulation. We show that such stimulation induces E2F1 to inhibit MDM2 promoter activity and promote p53 accumulation. Furthermore, inhibition of MDM2 by E2F1 promotes E2F1 induced apoptosis. These data suggest that E2F1 regulates the MDM2-p53 pathway by inhibiting p53 induced up-regulation of MDM2.     

Autoactivation of the MDM2 E3 Ligase by Intramolecular Interaction

The RING domain ubiquitin E3 ligase MDM2 is a key regulator of p53 degradation and a mediator of signals that stabilize p53. The current understanding of the mechanisms by which MDM2 posttranslational modifications and protein binding cause p53 stabilization remains incomplete. Here we present evidence that the MDM2 central acidic region is critical for activating RING domain E3 ligase activity. A 30-amino-acid minimal region of the acidic domain binds to the RING domain through intramolecular interactions and stimulates the catalytic function of the RING domain in promoting ubiquitin release from charged E2. The minimal activation sequence is also the binding site for the ARF tumor suppressor, which inhibits ubiquitination of p53. The acidic domain-RING domain intramolecular interaction is modulated by ATM-mediated phosphorylation near the RING domain or by binding of ARF. These results suggest that MDM2 phosphorylation and association with protein regulators share a mechanism in inhibiting the E3 ligase function and stabilizing p53 and suggest that targeting the MDM2 autoactivation mechanism may be useful for therapeutic modulation of p53 levels.     

The MDMX acidic domain competes with the p53 transactivation domain for MDM2 N-terminal domain binding

The tumor suppressor protein p53 governs many cellular pathways to control genome integrity, metabolic homeostasis, and cell viability. The critical roles of p53 highlight the importance of proper control over p53 in maintaining normal cellular function, with the negative regulators MDM2 and MDMX playing central roles in regulating p53 activity. The interaction between p53 and either MDM2 or MDMX involves the p53 transactivation domain (p53TD) and the N-terminal domains (NTD) of MDM2 or MDMX. Recently, the acidic domain (AD) of MDMX was found to bind to its own NTD, inhibiting the p53-MDMX interaction. Given the established structural and functional similarity between the MDM2 and MDMX NTDs, we hypothesized that the MDMX AD would also directly bind to MDM2 NTD to inhibit p53-MDM2 interaction. Through solution-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy and isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), we show that the MDMX AD can indeed directly interact with the MDM2 NTD and, as a result, can compete for p53 binding. The MDMX AD is thus able to serve as a regulatory domain to inhibit the MDM2-p53 interaction and may also play a direct role in p53 activation.     

Acidic domain is indispensable for MDM2 to negatively regulate the acetylation of p53

MDM2 is the most important negative regulator of tumor suppressor p53. Both RING finger domain and acidic domain of MDM2 contribute to the ubiquitination of p53. The crosstalk between ubiquitination and acetylation of p53 prompts us to examine whether acidic domain is essential for MDM2 to regulate the acetylation of p53. We find that the acidic domain of MDM2 is necessary to inhibit p300-mediated acetylation of p53 as well as to mediate the deacetylation of p53. Our results indicate that acidic domain of MDM2 provides essential information for acetyltransferase p300 and deacetylase HDAC1 and is indispensable for MDM2 to negatively regulate the acetylation of p53.     

Inhibition of MDM2 by hsp90 contributes to mutant p53 stabilization

Stabilization and overexpression are hallmarks of mutant p53 found in nearly 50% of human tumors. Mutations in the conformation-sensitive core domain of p53 often lead to association with molecular chaperones such as hsp70 and hsp90. Inhibition of hsp90 function accelerates mutant p53 degradation. We recently found that expression of p53 core domain mutants inhibits MDM2 degradation, suggesting that mutant p53 can modulate MDM2 functions. In this report, we show that mutant p53 mediates formation of MDM2-p53-hsp90 complexes. Release of MDM2 from the p53-hsp90 complex after DNA damage restores MDM2 but not p53 turnover, whereas dissociation of hsp90 by geldanamycin increases the degradation of both MDM2 and mutant p53. Mutant p53 degradation after hsp90 inhibition requires MDM2 expression. The interaction between MDM2 and hsp90 is disrupted by the 2A10 antibody, which recognizes a site on MDM2 important for binding to alternative reading frame (ARF). Expression of mutant p53 prevents MDM2 from binding ARF and accumulating in the nucleolus in an hsp90-dependent fashion. These results suggest that hsp90 recruited by mutant p53 conceals the ARF-binding site on MDM2 and inhibits its ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligase function, resulting in the stabilization of both mutant p53 and MDM2.     

XPC promotes MDM2-mediated degradation of the p53 tumor suppressor

Although ubiquitin receptor Rad23 has been implicated in bringing ubiquitylated p53 to the proteasome, how Rad23 recognizes p53 remains unclear. We demonstrate that XPC, a Rad23-binding protein, regulates p53 turnover. p53 protein in XPC-deficient cells remains ubiquitylated, but its association with the proteasome is drastically reduced, indicating that XPC regulates a postubiquitylation event. Furthermore, we found that XPC participates in the MDM2-mediated p53 degradation pathway via direct interaction with MDM2. XPC W690S pathogenic mutant is specifically defective for MDM2 binding and p53 degradation. p53 is known to become stabilized following UV irradiation but can be rendered unstable by XPC overexpression, underscoring a critical role of XPC in p53 regulation. Elucidation of the proteolytic role of XPC in cancer cells will help to unravel the detailed mechanisms underlying the coordination of DNA repair and proteolysis.