Characterization by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay of monoclonal antibodies to pisum and Avena phytochrome

Nine monoclonal antibodies to pea (Pisum sativum L.) and 16 to oat (Avena sativa L.) phytochrome are characterized by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay against phytochrome from six different sources: pea, zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L.), lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.), oat, rye (Secale cereale L.), and barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). All antibodies were raised against phytochrome with a monomer size near 120,000 daltons. Nevertheless, none of them discriminated qualitatively between 118/114-kilodalton oat phytochrome and a photoreversible, 60-kilodalton proteolytic degradation product derived from it. In addition, none of the 23 antibodies tested discriminated substantially between phytochrome—red-absorbing form and phytochrome—far red-absorbing form. Two antibodies to pea and six to oat phytochrome also bound strongly to phytochrome from the other species, even though these two plants are evolutionarily widely divergent. Of these eight antibodies, two bound significantly to all of the six phytochrome preparations tested, indicating that these two may recognize highly conserved regions of the chromoprotein. Since the molecular function of phytochrome is unknown, these two antibodies may serve as unique probes for regions of this pigment that are important to its mode of action.     

INTRACELLULAR PHYTOCHROME DISTRIBUTION AS A FUNCTION OF ITS MOLECULAR FORM AND OF ITS DESTRUCTION

The immunocytochemically observed intracellular redistribution of phytochrome as a function of its molecular form is described by utilizing color photomicrography. The reversible change from a diffuse to a discretely localized distribution following photoconversion of the red-absorbing Pr form to the far-red-absorbing Pfr form observed with etiolated oat (Avena sativa L., cv. Garry) coleoptile parenchyma cells is not seen with etiolated wheat (Triticum sativum L., cv. unknown), barley (Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Harrison), or rye (Secale cereale L., cv. Balbo). Whether redistribution in these latter cases does not occur or is below the limit of detection is not known. Upon continuous actinic irradiation, phytochrome, which is discretely localized as Pfr, rapidly disappears by both immunocytochemical and spectral assay. However, after about 90 min irradiation, a new association of phytochrome with nuclei is evident which is more pronounced after 4 or 8 h of irradiation. With longer irradiation times there is a total loss of antigenically detectable phytochrome at the resolution employed in these experiments.     

Phytochrome Characterization by Rabbit Antiserum against High Molecular Weight Phytochrome

Both small and large sizes of phytochrome purified from Garry oat (Avena sativa L. ev. Garry) as well as large phytochrome purified from Newton oat (A. sativa L. cv. Newton), rye (Secale cereale L. cv. Balbo), barley (Hordeum vulgare L. cv. Harrison), and pea (Pisum sativum L. cv. Alaska) seedlings are characterized by a specific antiserum against large Garry oat phytochrome. A spur is observed by double diffusion assay against large and small Garry oat phytochrome indicating only partial identity. In micro-complement fixation assays, large Garry oat phytochrome yields greater activity than small Garry oat phytochrome. In addition, the peak of activity is shifted to a higher antigen concentration with small phytochrome. Phytochrome, red-absorbing form, and phytochrome, far redabsorbing form, are indistinguishable by both double diffusion and micro-complement fixation assay. The different grass phytochromes are antigenically identical by double diffusion assay. Immunoelectrophoretic analyses of oat and rye large phytochrome, after proteolysis, suggest that there are one or a few regions of the molecule especially susceptible to hydrolysis by a wide variety of endopeptidases.     

Phytochrome photoreversibility: Empirical test of the hypothesis that it varies as a consequence of pigment compartmentation

Phytochrome of oat (Avena sativa L., cv. Garry) coleoptile cells in the red-light-absorbing form, Pr, is diffusely distributed while after conversion to the far-red-light-absorbing form, Pfr, it is observed only in very small areas within the cell. Comparison of phytochrome photoversibility measurements to the distribution of the pigment within the cell indicates that the spectral assay is not influenced by the observed compartmentalization of the chromoprotein. However, the observed compartmentalization of phytochrome is correlated with a loss in spectrophotometrically detectable Pr.Abbreviations Pr red-absorbing form of phytochrome - Pfr farred-absorbing form of phytochrome - R red light - FR far-red light C.I.W.-D.P.B. Publication No. 622     

Phytochrome-controlled extension growth of Avena sativa L. seedlings

The effects of continuous red and far-red light and of brief light pulses on the growth kinetics of the mesocotyl, coleoptile, and primary leaf of intact oat (Avena sativa L.) seedlings were investigated. Mesocotyl lengthening is strongly inhibited, even by very small amounts of P_fr, the far-red light absorbing form of phytochrome (e.g., by [P_fr]0.1% of total phytochrome, established by a 756-nm light pulse). Coleoptile growth is at first promoted by P_fr, but apparently inhibited later. This inhibition is correlated in time with the rupturing of the coleoptile tip by the primary leaf, the growth of which is also promoted by phytochrome. The growth responses of all three seedling organs are fully reversible by far-red light. The apparent lack of photoreversibility observed by some previous investigators of the mesocotyl inhibition can be explained by an extremely high sensitivity to P_fr. Experiments with different seedling parts failed to demonstrate any further obvious interorgan relationship in the light-mediated growth responses of the mesocotyl and coleoptile. The organspecific growth kinetics, don't appear to be influenced by P_fr destruction. Following an irradiation, the growth responses are quantitatively determined by the level of P_fr established at the onset of darkness rather than by the actual P_fr level present during the growth period.Abbreviation P_fr far-red light absorbing form of phytochrome     

Immunological assay of phytochrome in small sections of roots and other organs of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings

Phytochrome was determined in small sections of maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings by means of a highly specific double sandwich enzyme immunoassay which uses a monoclonal anti-phytochrome antibody for binding phytochrome and anti-phytochrome serum to detect the bound phytochrome. The distribution of phytochrome in maize seedlings was followed from germination to the 7th d after soaking the caryopses. Regions of high phytochrome accumulation were found in the coleoptile tip, the root cap and the shoot apex: the values for 5-d-old seedlings were 120, 80 and 70 g phytochrome per g fresh weight (or 0.91, 0.61 and 0.53 nmol·g^-1), respectively. The mesocotyl and the leaves contained relatively low amounts of phytochrome (less than 10 g·g^-1FW), which were almost uniformly distributed throughout these organs. As might be expected, regions of these organs adjacent to the shoot apex showed higher levels. The root, other than root tip, was almost devoid of phytochrome (0.2 to 0.5 g·g^-1). The general distribution of phytochrome in organs did not change during the development of seedlings. The amount of phytochrome, however, did fluctuate: up to the 5th or 6th d after soaking the caryopses, the levels increased in the regions of high phytochrome accumulation but thereafter decreased. After the 6th d the roots were 15 cm or longer and the coleoptiles became prone to penetration by primary leaves. The tips of adventitious roots, emerging after the 6th d, were also found to contain phytochrome. When the root cap was illuminated (4.3 W·m^-1), phytochrome was degraded as in illuminated shoots. Degradation of phytochrome in coleoptile, mesocotyl and shoot apex started with a lag phase but phytochrome degradation in the root cap and the leaves started without a lag. In contrast to shoot phytochrome, which was almost completely degraded under continuous illumination, about 3% of initial phytochrome was measured in root caps after 24 h continuous illumination. Some of the data, obtained by immunological measurements, may indicate differences between phytochrome, or its synthesis or degradation, in the root cap and shoots. The results are discussed with a view to different red-light-mediated responses of grass seedlings.Abbreviations ABTS 2,2-azino-bis(3-ethylbenz-thiazoline)-sulfonic acid - EIA enzyme immunoassay - PBS phosphatebuffered saline - SDS-PAGE sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis     

Effect of red light on coleoptile growth

The effects of red light in reducing the growth of the oat (Avena sativa L.) coleoptile and the synthesis of auxin in the coleoptile tip are detectable 2 hours after treatment and become more pronounced with time. When the coleoptile tip is supplied with additional tryptophan the synthesis of auxin is doubled both in darkness and when exposed to red light. Treatment of the tip with gibberellic acid or pyridoxal phosphate overcomes the reduction of auxin synthesis caused by red light. The uptake of exogenous indoleacetic acid, at pH 6.5, by coleoptile tissue is doubled by exposure to red light. The effect of red light on coleoptile growth appears to be mediated by phytochrome in the cell membrane which delocalizes the tryptophan utilized for auxin synthesis.     

Phytochrome — all regions marked by a set of monoclonal antibodies reflect conformational changes

Monoclonal antibodies to defined locations on six regions of the phytochrome molecule (from Avena sativa L. or Zea mays L.) were each found to have a different affinity toward the farred-absorbing form of phytochrome (Pfr) and the red-absorbing form (Pr). The differences were small, but were consistently shown by antibodies which bind to the vicinity of the aminoterminus, the carboxylterminus and to sequences in between. It seems that the conformational differences between Pr and Pfr extend over the whole molecule in as far as it is represented by these regions and the antibodies binding to them.Abbreviations Pfr far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome - Pr red-absorbing form of phytochrome     

Action of red light on indole-3-acetic-acid status and growth in coleoptiles of etiolated maize seedlings

Brief irradiation of intact etiolated seedlings of maize (Zea mays L.) with red light (R; 30 W cm^-2, 10 min) reduces the amounts of diffusible and free (solvent-extractable) indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) obtainable from excised coleoptile tips. The effect is transient, the lowest level (30% of the dark control) occurring at about 3 h after irradiation. The free-IAA content of the whole coleoptile and the diffusible-IAA yield from the base of the same organ are similarly reduced, whereas the conjugated-IAA content of the coleoptile is not affected. These results support the view that R inhibits the production of IAA at the coleoptile tip. It is further shown that R inhibits biosynthesis of [³H]IAA from [³H]tryptophan supplied to the coleoptile tip. The shapes of the fluence-response curves obtained for the reduction of the diffusible-IAA yield by R and far-red light (FR) indicate the participation of two photoreactive systems. One has thresholds at 10^-3 W s cm² of R, five orders of magnitude less than the minimum required for the appearance of spectrophotometrically measurable far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome (Pfr) in vivo, and 10^-1 W s cm^-2 of FR; its response is linear to the logarithm of fluence exceeding five orders of magnitude. The other system is seen above 10² W s cm^-2 as an increase in the slope of the fluenceresponse curve; its response is FR reversible and related to the Pfr level of total photoreversible phytochrome. Both systems inhibit biosynthesis of IAA from tryptophan. Elongation of the coleoptile is stimulated by R; the stimulation is most apparent in the apical region, and is saturated with a fluence at which bo detectable pfr is formed. Farred light can also saturate this response. Since the endogenous IAA concentration in the coleoptile appears not to be in the inhibitory range, it is concluded that the stimulation of coleoptile elongation is not the result of changes in free-IAA levels.Abbreviations FR far-red light - IAA indole-3-acetic acid - Pfr phytochrome in the far-red-absorbing form - Pr phytochrome in the red-absorbing form - R red light     

Immunochemical detection with rabbit polyclonal and mouse monoclonal antibodies of different pools of phytochrome from etiolated and green Avena shoots

While two monoclonal antibodies directed to phytochrome from etiolated oat (Avena sativa L.) shoots can precipitate up to about 30% of the photoreversible phytochrome isolated from green oat shoots, most precipitate little or none at all. These results are consistent with a report by J.G. Tokuhisa and P.H. Quail (1983, Plant Physiol. 72, Suppl., 85), according to which polyclonal rabbit antibodies directed to phytochrome from etiolated oat shoots bind only a small fraction of the phytochrome obtained from green oat shoots. The immunoprecipitation data reported here indicate that essentially all phytochrome isolated from green oat shoots is distinct from that obtained from etiolated oat shoots. The data indicate further that phytochrome from green oat shoots might itself be composed of two or more immunochemically distinct populations, each of which is distinct from phytochrome from etiolated shoots. Phytochrome isolated from light-grown, but norflurazon-bleached oat shoots is like that isolated from green oat shoots. When light-grown, green oat seedlings are kept in darkness for 48 h, however, much, if not all, of the phytochrome that reaccumulates is like that from etiolated oat shoots. Neither modification during purification from green oat shoots of phytochrome like that from etiolated oat shoots, nor non-specific interference by substances in extracts of green oat shoots, can explain the inability of antibodies to recognize phytochrome isolated from green oat shoots. Immunopurified polyclonal rabbit antibodies to phytochrome from etiolated pea (Pisum sativum L.). shoots precipitate more than 95% of the photoreversible phytochrome obtained from etiolated pea shoots, while no more than 75% of the pigment is precipitated when phytochrome is isolated from green pea shoots. These data indicate in preliminary fashion that an immunochemically unique pool of phytochrome might also be present in extracts of green pea shoots.Abbreviation ELISA enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay - mU milliunit - Pfr far-red-absorbing form of phytochrome - Pr red-absorbing form of phytochrome     

PHYTOCHROME DISTRIBUTION IN ETIOLATED GRASS SEEDLINGS AS ASSAYED BY AN INDIRECT ANTIBODY-LABELLING METHOD

The distribution of phytochrome in several etiolated grass seedlings (Avena saliva L., cvs. Garry and Newton; Secale cereale L., cv. Balbo; Hordeum vulgare L., cv. Harrison; Oryza sativa L; Zea mays L., cv. Golden Cross) was determined, by an indirect antibody-labelling method employing peroxidase as the ultimate label. Although the pattern of phytochrome distribution in etiolated shoots varies widely, it is nevertheless clear that, with the exception of corn, in which phytochrome is relatively uniformly distributed, the distribution of phytochrome is highly specific with respect both to organs and to cell types within an organ for a given species. Oat, rye, barley, and rice shoots all have high concentrations of phytochrome near the tips of their coleoptiles, as well as near the shoot apex itself. Rice, barley, and rye also have high concentrations of phytochrome in their leaf bases, but oat leaves are almost totally devoid of measurable phytochrome. An association of phytochrome with vascular tissue often occurs and is most pronounced in the rice shoot. Dark-grown roots were found to have high levels of phytochrome only in the root caps, with lesser amounts, if any, observed in other parts of the root.     

Intracellular localisation of phytochrome in oat coleoptiles by electron microscopy

We have analysed the intracellular localisation of phytochrome in oat coleoptile cells by electron microscopy and confirm and extend light-microscopical findings of previous authors. We used indirect immuno-labeling with polyclonal antibodies against 60-KDa phytochrome from etiolated oat seedlings, and a gold-coupled second antibody, on ultrathin sections of LR-white-embedded material. In dark-grown seedlings, phytochrome-labeling is distributed diffusely throughout the cytoplasm. Organelles and membranes are not labeled. After photoconversion of the red-absorbing form of phytochrome to the far-red absorbing form (Pfr) (5-min red light; 660 nm), the label is sequestered uniquely in electron-dense areas within the cytoplasm. These areas are irregularly shaped, are often located in the vicinity of the vacuole, are not surrounded by a membrane, exclude cellular organelles and ribosomes and are not found in dark-grown material; an immediate 5-min farred light pulse after the red light does not cause these structures to disappear. After a dark period of 3–4 h following red-light irradiation, these electron-dense structures disappear together with any specific labeling. We suggest a Pfr-induced aggregation of an unknown, phytochrome-binding protein or proteins.Abbreviations Pr and Pfr phytochrome in its red and far-red absorbing form, respectively     

Inhibitory action of red light on the growth of the maize mesocotyl: evaluation of the auxin hypothesis

Brief irradiation of 3-d-old maize (Zea mays L.) seedlings with red light (R; 180 J m^-2) inhibits elongation of the mesocotyl (70–80% inhibition in 8 h) and reduces its indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) content. The reduction in IAA content, apparent within a few hours, is the result of a reduction in the supply of IAA from the coleoptile unit (which includes the shoot apex and primary leaves). The fluence-response relationship for the inhibition of mesocotyl growth by R and far-red light closely resemble those for the reduction of the IAA supply from the coleoptile. The relationship between the concentration of IAA (1–10 M) supplied to the cut surface of the mesocotyl of seedlings with their coleoptile removed and the growth increment of the mesocotyl, measured after 4 h, is linear. The hypothesis that R inhibits mesocotyl growth mainly by reducing the IAA supply from the coleoptile is supported. However, mesocotyl growth in seedlings from which the coleoptiles have been removed is also inhibited by R (about 25% inhibition in 8 h). This inhibition is not related to changes in the IAA level, and not relieved by applied IAA. In intact seedlings, this effect may also participate in the inhibition of mesocotyl growth by R. Inhibition of cell division by R, whose mechanism is not known, will also result in reduced mesocotyl elongation especially in the long term (e.g. 24 h).Abbreviations FR far-red light - IAA indole-3-acetic acid - P_fr phytochrome in the far-red-absorbing form - P_r phytochrome in the red-absorbing form - R red light     

Intracellular redistribution of phytochrome in etiolated soybean (Glycine max L.) seedlings

The intracellular distribution of phytochrome in hypocotyl hooks of etiolated soybean (Glycine max L.) has been examined by immunofluorescence using a newly produced monoclonal antibody (Soy-1) directed to phytochrome purified from etiolated soybean shoots. Cortical cells in the hook region exhibit the strongest phytochrome-associated fluorescence, which is diffusely distributed throughout the cytosol in unirradiated, etiolated seedlings. A redistribution of immunocytochemically detectable hytochrome to discrete areas (sequestering) following irradiation with red light requires a few minutes at room temperature in soybean, whereas this redistribution is reversed rapidly following irradiation with far-red light. In contrast, sequestering in oat (Avena sativa L.) occurs within a few seconds (D. McCurdy and L. Pratt, 1986, Planta 167, 330–336) while its reversal by far-red light requires hours (J. M. Mackenzie Jr. et al., 1975, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72, 799–803). The time courses, however, of red-light-enhanced phytochrome pelletability and sequestering are similar for soybean as they are for oat. Thus, while these observations made with a dicotyledon are consistent with the previous conclusion derived from work with oat, namely that sequestering and enhanced pelletability are different manifestations of the same intracellular event, they are inconsistent with the hypothesis that either is a primary step in the mode of action of phytochrome.Abbreviations DIC differential interference contrast - FR far-red light - Ig immunoglobulin - Pfr, P far-red- and red-absorbing form of phytochrome, respectively - R red light This work was supported by National Science Foundation grant No. DCB-8703057.     

An oat coleoptile wall protein that induces wall extension in vitro and that is antigenically related to a similar protein from cucumber hypocotyls

Plant cell walls expand considerably during cell enlargement, but the biochemical reactions leading to wall expansion are unknown. McQueen-Mason et al. (1992, Plant Cell 4, 1425) recently identified two proteins from cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) that induced extension in walls isolated from dicotyledons, but were relatively ineffective on grass coleoptile walls. Here we report the identification and partial characterization of an oat (Avena sativa L.) coleoptile wall protein with similar properties. The oat protein has an apparent molecular mass of 29 kDa as revealed by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel eletrophoresis. Activity was optimal between pH 4.5 and 5.0, which makes it a suitable candidate for acid growth responses of plant cell walls. The oat protein induced extension in walls from oat coleoptiles, cucumber hypocotyls and pea (Pisum sativum L.) epicotyls and was specifically recognized by an antibody raised against the 29-kDa wall-extension-inducing protein from cucumber hypocotyls. Contrary to the situation in cucumber walls, the acid-extension response in heat-inactivated oat walls was only partially restored by oat or cucumber wall-extension proteins. Our results show that an antigenically conserved protein in the walls of cucumber and oat seedlings is able to mediate a form of acid-induced wall extension. This implies that dicotyledons and grasses share a common biochemical mechanism for at least part of acid-induced wall extensions, despite the significant differences in wall composition between these two classes of plants.Abbreviations ConA concanavalin A - CM carboxymethyl - DEAE diethylaminoethyl - DTT dithiothreitol - Ex29 29-kDa expansin     

Phytochrome control of electrical potentials and intercellular coupling in oat-coleoptile tissue

Summary Microelectrodes were used to demonstrate two electrical responses which occur in oat (Avena sativa L.) coleoptile parenchyma-cells during exposure to red light. The membrane potential of these cells depolarized 5–10 mV in several seconds in red light and repolarized more slowly in far-red light. By pulsing current through the cells, it was found that cellular coupling along the longitudinal axis of the coleoptile increased about 2-fold in red light, but that coupling along the lateral axis was not affected. The rapid changes in membrane potential are consistent with the idea of a membrane locale for early phytochrome action. The coupling experiments suggest that phytochrome may also affect plasmodesmata in this system.     

High-irradiance responses induced by far-red light in grass seedlings of the wild type or overexpressing phytochrome A

The occurrence of phytochrome-mediated highirradiance responses (HIR), previously characterised largely in dicotyledonous plants, was investigated in Triticum aestivum L., Zea mays L., Lolium multiflorum Lam. and in both wild-type Oryza sativa L. and in transgenic plants overexpressing oat phytochrome A under the control of a 35S promoter. Coleoptile growth was promoted (maize, ryegrass) or inhibited (wild-type rice) by continuous far-red light (FRc). However, at equal fluences, hourly pulses of far-red light (FRp) were equally effective, indicating that the growth responses to FRc were not true HIR. In contrast, in maize and rice, FRc increased anthocyanin content in the coleoptile in a fluence-rate dependent manner. This response was a true HIR as FRp had reduced effects. In maize, anthocyanin levels were significantly higher under FRc than under continuous red light. In rice, overexpression of phytochrome A increased the inhibition of coleoptile growth and the levels of anthocyanin under FRc but not under FRp or under continuous red light. The effect of FRc was fluence-rate dependent. In light-grown rice, overexpression of phytochrome A reduced leaf-sheath length, impaired the response to supplementary far-red light, but did not affect the response to canopy shade-light. In grasses, typical HIR, i.e. fluence-rate dependent responses showing reciprocity failure, can be induced by FRc. Under FRc, overexpressed phytochrome A operates through this action mode in transgenic rice.Abbreviations FR far-red light - FRc continuous far-red light - FRp pulses of far-red light - HIR high-irradiance responses - LFR low-fluence responses - OPHYA transgenic rice overexpressing oat phytochrome A - Pfr far-red light-absorbing form of phytochrome - phyA phytochrome A - R red light - Rc continuous red light - VLFR very low-fluence responses - WT wildtype We thank Marcelo J. Yanovsky for his help with the photographs and Professor Rodolfo A. Sanchez for providing a reprint of the paper by P.J.A.L. de Lint. This work was supported by grants from UBA (AG041) and Fundacion Antorchas (A-13218/1-15) to J.J.C.     

Purification of oat and rye phytochrome

A purification procedure employing normal chromatographic techniques is outlined for isolating phytochrome from etiolated oat (Avena sativa L.) seedlings. Yields in excess of 20% (25 milligrams or more) of phytochrome in crude extract were obtained from 10- to 15-kilograms lots. The purified oat phytochrome had an absorbance ratio (A₂₈₀ nm/A₆₆₅ nm) of 0.78 to 0.85, comparable to reported values, and gave a single major band with an estimated molecular weight of 62,000 on electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. A modification of the oat isolation procedure was used to isolate phytochrome from etiolated rye Secale cereale cv. Balbo) seedlings. During isolation rye phytochrome exhibited chromatographic profiles differing from oat phytochrome on diethylaminoethyl cellulose and on molecular sieve gels. It eluted at a higher salt concentration on diethylaminoethyl cellulose and nearer the void volume on molecular sieve gels. Yields of 5 to 10% (7.5-10 milligrams) of phytochrome in crude extract were obtained from 10- to 12-kilogram seedling lots. The purified rye phytochrome had an absorbance ratio of 1.25 to 1.37, significantly lower than values in the literature and gave a single major band with an estimated molecular weight of 120,000 on electrophoresis in sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels. It is suggested that the absorbance ratio and electrophoretic behavior of rye phytochrome are indices of purified native phytochrome, and that oat phytochrome as it has been described is an artifact which arises as a result of endogenous proteolysis during isolation. A rationale is provided for further modifications of the purification procedure to alleviate presumed protease contaminants.     

Comparative immunochemistry of phytochrome

Partially purified high molecular weight preparations of phytochrome, estimated to be close to 440,000 molecular weight based upon chromatography through a calibrated Bio-Gel P-300 column, were obtained from Garry and Newton oats (Avena Sativa L., cv. Garry and cv. Newton), rye (Secale cereale L., cv. Balbo), barley (Horedum vulgare L., cv. Harrison), and pea (Pisum sativum L., cv. Alaska) by a sequence of three chromatographic steps: brushite, diethylaminoethyl cellulose, and Bio-Gel P-300. No significant differences were observed between these preparations during purification or subsequent handling. In addition, a low molecular weight form of phytochrome was purified from Garry oats. Two specific antisera against a low molecular weight form of phytochrome (60,000 molecular weight) obtained from etiolated Garry oat seedlings are characterized and used to compare the phytochrome preparations. Double diffusion assays indicated antigenic identity between all preparations except that pea phytochrome yielded a spur when compared to oat phytochrome. Micro complement fixation assays yielded complete identity between Garry and Newton oat phytochrome, reduced activity with rye and barley phytochrome, and a complete lack of activity with pea phytochrome at the serum dilutions assayed. Immunoelectrophoretic assays indicated that all high molecular weight phytochrome preparations were homogeneous by this criterion and that there were only slight differences between the preparations in electrophoretic mobility. Large and small forms of phytochrome isolated from Garry oats were found to be very similar antigens when tested with the anti-small phytochrome sera, although the small form was observed to electrophorese at a much slower rate than the large.     

Sources of Free IAA in the Mesocotyl of Etiolated Maize Seedlings

Sources of free indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) for the mesocotyl of intact etiolized maize ((Zea mays L.) seedlings are evaluated. The coleoptile unit, which includes the primary leaves and the coleoptilar node, is the main source of free IAA for the mesocotyl. The seed and the roots are not immediate sources of IAA supply. Dependence of the apical growing region of the mesocotyl on the coleoptile unit as a source of free IAA is almost total. One-half or more of the supply of IAA comes from the coleoptile tip, the rest mainly from the primary leaves. Removal of the coleoptile tip results in inhibition of mesocotyl elongation. The hypothesis that growth of the mesocotyl is regulated by auxin supplied by the coleoptile is supported. Conjugated forms of IAA appear to play little part in regulating the levels of free IAA in the shoot.