Understanding the Rate Capability of High‐Energy‐Density Li‐Rich Layered Li1.2Ni0.15Co0.1Mn0.55O2 Cathode Materials

The high‐energy‐density, Li‐rich layered materials, i.e., xLiMO₂(1‐x)Li₂MnO₃, are promising candidate cathode materials for electric energy storage in plug‐in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) and electric vehicles (EVs). The relatively low rate capability is one of the major problems that need to be resolved for these materials. To gain insight into the key factors that limit the rate capability, in situ X‐ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) and X‐ray diffraction (XRD) studies of the cathode material, Li_1.2Ni_0.15Co_0.1Mn_0.55O₂ [0.5Li(Ni_0.375Co_0.25 Mn_0.375)O₂·0.5Li₂MnO₃], are carried out. The partial capacity contributed by different structural components and transition metal elements is elucidated and correlated with local structure changes. The characteristic reaction kinetics for each element are identified using a novel time‐resolved XAS technique. Direct experimental evidence is obtained showing that Mn sites have much poorer reaction kinetics both before and after the initial activation of Li₂MnO₃, compared to Ni and Co. These results indicate that Li₂MnO₃ may be the key component that limits the rate capability of Li‐rich layered materials and provide guidance for designing Li‐rich layered materials with the desired balance of energy density and rate capability for different applications.     

Elucidating the Effect of Iron Doping on the Electrochemical Performance of Cobalt‐Free Lithium‐Rich Layered Cathode Materials

The eco‐friendly and low‐cost Co‐free Li_1.2Mn_0.585Ni_0.185Fe_0.03O₂ is investigated as a positive material for Li‐ion batteries. The electrochemical performance of the 3 at% Fe‐doped material exhibits an optimal performance with a capacity and voltage retention of 70 and 95%, respectively, after 200 cycles at 1C. The effect of iron doping on the electrochemical properties of lithium‐rich layered materials is investigated by means of in situ X‐ray diffraction spectroscopy and galvanostatic intermittent titration technique during the first charge–discharge cycle while high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy is used to follow the structural and chemical change of the electrode material upon long‐term cycling. By means of these characterizations it is concluded that iron doping is a suitable approach for replacing cobalt while mitigating the voltage and capacity degradation of lithium‐rich layered materials. Finally, complete lithium‐ion cells employing Li_1.2Mn_0.585Ni_0.185Fe_0.03O₂ and graphite show a specific energy of 361 Wh kg^?1 at 0.1C rate and very stable performance upon cycling, retaining more than 80% of their initial capacity after 200 cycles at 1C rate. These results highlight the bright prospects of this material to meet the high energy density requirements for electric vehicles.     

Site‐Selective In Situ Electrochemical Doping for Mn‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode Materials in Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Various doped materials have been investigated to improve the structural stability of layered transition metal oxides for lithium‐ion batteries. Most doped materials are obtained through solid state methods, in which the doping of cations is not strictly site selective. This paper demonstrates, for the first time, an in situ electrochemical site‐selective doping process that selectively substitutes Li⁺ at Li sites in Mn‐rich layered oxides with Mg²⁺. Mg²⁺ cations are electrochemically intercalated into Li sites in delithiated Mn‐rich layered oxides, resulting in the formation of [Li_1?xMg_y][Mn_1?zM_z]O₂ (M = Co and Ni). This Mg²⁺ intercalation is irreversible, leading to the favorable doping of Mg²⁺ at the Li sites. More interestingly, the amount of intercalated Mg²⁺ dopants increases with the increasing amount of Mn in Li_1?x[Mn_1?zM_z]O₂, which is attributed to the fact that the Mn‐to‐O electron transfer enhances the attractive interaction between Mg²⁺ dopants and electronegative O^δ? atoms. Moreover, Mg²⁺ at the Li sites in layered oxides suppresses cation mixing during cycling, resulting in markedly improved capacity retention over 200 cycles. The first‐principle calculations further clarify the role of Mg²⁺ in reduced cation mixing during cycling. The new concept of in situ electrochemical doping provides a new avenue for the development of various selectively doped materials.     

Stabilized Co‐Free Li‐Rich Oxide Cathode Particles with An Artificial Surface Prereconstruction

Li‐rich metal oxide (LXMO) cathodes have attracted intense interest for rechargeable batteries because of their high capacity above 250 mAh g^?1. However, the side effects of hybrid anion and cation redox (HACR) reactions, such as oxygen release and phase collapse that result from global oxygen migration (GOM), have prohibited the commercialization of LXMO. GOM not only destabilizes the oxygen sublattice in cycling, aggravating the well‐known voltage fading, but also intensifies electrolyte decomposition and Mn dissolution, causing severe full‐cell performance degradation. Herein, an artificial surface prereconstruction (ASR) for Li_1.2Mn_0.6Ni_0.2O₂ particles with a molten‐molybdate leaching is conducted, which creates a crystal‐dense anion‐redox‐free LiMn_1.5Ni_0.5O₄ shell that completely encloses the LXMO lattice (ASR‐LXMO). Differential electrochemical mass spectroscopy and soft X‐ray absorption spectroscopy analyses demonstrate that GOM is shut down in cycling, which not only stabilizes HACR in ASR‐LXMO, but also mitigates the electrolyte decomposition and Mn dissolution. ASR‐LXMO displays greatly stabilized cycling performance as it retains 237.4 mAh g^?1 with an average discharge voltage of 3.30 V after 200 cycles. More crucially, while the pristine LXMO cycling cannot survive 90 cycles in a pouch full‐cell matched with a commercial graphite anode and lean (2 g A^?1 h^?1) electrolyte, ASR‐LXMO shows high capacity retention of 76% after 125 cycles in full‐cell cycling.     

Lithium‐ and Manganese‐Rich Oxide Cathode Materials for High‐Energy Lithium Ion Batteries

Layered lithium‐ and manganese‐rich oxides (LMROs), described as xLi₂MnO₃·(1–x)LiMO₂ or Li_1+yM_1–yO₂ (M = Mn, Ni, Co, etc., 0 < x <1, 0 < y ≤ 0.33), have attracted much attention as cathode materials for lithium ion batteries in recent years. They exhibit very promising capacities, up to above 300 mA h g^?1, due to transition metal redox reactions and unconventional oxygen anion redox reaction. However, they suffer from structural degradation and severe voltage fade (i.e., decreasing energy storage) upon cycling, which are plaguing their practical application. Thus, this review will aim to describe the pristine structure, high‐capacity mechanisms and structure evolutions of LMROs. Also, recent progress associated with understanding and mitigating the voltage decay of LMROs will be discussed. Several approaches to solve this problem, such as adjusting cycling voltage window and chemical composition, optimizing synthesis strategy, controlling morphology, doping, surface modification, constructing core‐shell and layered‐spinel hetero structures, are described in detail.     

Insight of a Phase Compatible Surface Coating for Long‐Durable Li‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode

Li‐rich layered oxides (LLOs) can deliver almost double the capacity of conventional electrode materials such as LiCoO₂ and LiMn₂O₄; however, voltage fade and capacity degradation are major obstacles to the practical implementation of LLOs in high‐energy lithium‐ion batteries. Herein, hexagonal La_0.8Sr_0.2MnO_3?y (LSM) is used as a protective and phase‐compatible surface layer to stabilize the Li‐rich layered Li_1.2Ni_0.13Co_0.13Mn_0.54O₂ (LM) cathode material. The LSM is Mn? O? M bonded at the LSM/LM interface and functions by preventing the migration of metal ions in the LM associated with capacity degradation as well as enhancing the electrical transfer and ionic conductivity at the interface. The LSM‐coated LM delivers an enhanced reversible capacity of 202 mAh g^?1 at 1 C (260 mA g^?1) with excellent cycling stability and rate capability (94% capacity retention after 200 cycles and 144 mAh g^?1 at 5 C). This work demonstrates that interfacial bonding between coating and bulk material is a successful strategy for the modification of LLO electrodes for the next‐generation of high‐energy Li‐ion batteries.     

A New Spinel‐Layered Li‐Rich Microsphere as a High‐Rate Cathode Material for Li‐Ion Batteries

Li‐rich layered materials are considered to be the promising low‐cost cathodes for lithium‐ion batteries but they suffer from poor rate capability despite of efforts toward surface coating or foreign dopings. Here, spinel‐layered Li‐rich Li‐Mn‐Co‐O microspheres are reported as a new high‐rate cathode material for Li‐ion batteries. The synthetic procedure is relatively simple, involving the formation of uniform carbonate precursor under solvothermal conditions and its subsequent transformation to an assembled microsphere that integrates a spinel‐like component with a layered component by a heat treatment. When calcined at 700 °C, the amount of transition metal Mn and Co in the Li‐Mn‐Co‐O microspheres maintained is similar to at 800 °C, while the structures of constituent particles partially transform from 2D to 3D channels. As a consequence, when tested as a cathode for lithium‐ion batteries, the spinel‐layered Li‐rich Li‐Mn‐Co‐O microspheres obtained at 700 °C show a maximum discharge capacity of 185.1 mA h g^?1 at a very high current density of 1200 mA g^?1 between 2.0 and 4.6 V. Such a capacity is among the highest reported to date at high charge‐discharge rates. Therefore, the present spinel‐layered Li‐rich Li‐Mn‐Co‐O microspheres represent an attractive alternative to high‐rate electrode materials for lithium‐ion batteries.     

A Novel Strategy to Suppress Capacity and Voltage Fading of Li‐ and Mn‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode Material for Lithium‐Ion Batteries

Poor cycling stability is one of the key scientific issues needing to be solved for Li‐ and Mn‐rich layered oxide cathode. In this paper, sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) is first used as a novel binder in Li_1.2Ni_0.13Co_0.13Mn_0.54O₂ cathode to enhance its cycling stability. Electrochemical performance is conducted by galvanostatic charge and discharge. Structure and morphology are characterized by X‐ray diffraction, scanning electronic microscopy, high‐resolution transmission electron microscopy, and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Results reveal that the CMC as binder can not only stabilize the electrode structure by preventing the electrode materials to detach from the current collector but also suppress the voltage fading of the Li_1.2Ni_0.13Co_0.13Mn_0.54O₂ cathode due to Na⁺ ions doping. Most importantly, the dissolution of metal elements from the cathode materials into the electrolyte is also inhibited.     

Review on Challenges and Recent Advances in the Electrochemical Performance of High Capacity Li‐ and Mn‐Rich Cathode Materials for Li‐Ion Batteries

Li and Mn‐rich layered oxides, xLi₂MnO₃·(1–x)LiMO₂ (M=Ni, Mn, Co), are promising cathode materials for Li‐ion batteries because of their high specific capacity that can exceed 250 mA h g^?1. However, these materials suffer from high 1^st cycle irreversible capacity, gradual capacity fading, low rate capability, a substantial charge‐discharge voltage hysteresis, and a large average discharge voltage decay during cycling. The latter detrimental phenomenon is ascribed to irreversible structural transformations upon cycling of these cathodes related to potentials ≥4.5 V required for their charging. Transition metal inactivation along with impedance increase and partial layered‐to‐spinel transformation during cycling are possible reasons for the detrimental voltage fade. Doping of Li, Mn‐rich materials by Na, Mg, Al, Fe, Co, Ru, etc. is useful for stabilizing capacity and mitigating the discharge‐voltage decay of xLi₂MnO₃·(1–x)LiMO₂ electrodes. Surface modifications by thin coatings of Al₂O₃, V₂O₅, AlF₃, AlPO₄, etc. or by gas treatment (for instance, by NH₃) can also enhance voltage and capacity stability during cycling. This paper describes the recent literature results and ongoing efforts from our groups to improve the performance of Li, Mn‐rich materials. Focus is also on preparation of cobalt‐free cathodes, which are integrated layered‐spinel materials with high reversible capacity and stable performance.     

Al Doping for Mitigating the Capacity Fading and Voltage Decay of Layered Li and Mn‐Rich Cathodes for Li‐Ion Batteries

Li and Mn‐rich layered cathodes, despite their high specific capacity, suffer from capacity fading and discharge voltage decay upon cycling. Both specific capacity and discharge voltage of Li and Mn‐rich cathodes are stabilized upon cycling by optimized Al doping. Doping Li and Mn‐rich cathode materials Li_1.2Ni_0.16Mn_0.56Co_0.08O₂ by Al on the account of manganese (as reflected by their stoichiometry) results in a decrease in their specific capacity but increases pronouncedly their stability upon cycling. Li_1.2Ni_0.16Mn_0.51Al_0.05Co_0.08O₂ exhibits 96% capacity retention as compared to 68% capacity retention for Li_1.2Ni_0.16Mn_0.56Co_0.08O₂ after 100 cycles. This doping also reduces the decrease in the average discharge voltage upon cycling, which is the longstanding fatal drawback of these Li and Mn‐rich cathode materials. The electrochemical impedance study indicates that doping by Al has a surface stabilization effect on these cathode materials. The structural analysis of cycled electrodes by Raman spectroscopy suggests that Al doping also has a bulk stabilizing effect on the layered LiMO₂ phase resulting in the better electrochemical performance of Al doped cathode materials as compared to the undoped counterpart. Results from a prolonged systematic work on these cathode materials are presented and the best results that have ever been obtained are reported.     

Operando Lithium Dynamics in the Li‐Rich Layered Oxide Cathode Material via Neutron Diffraction

Neutron diffraction under operando battery cycling is used to study the lithium and oxygen dynamics of high Li‐rich Li(Li_x/3Ni_(3/8‐3x/8)Co_(1/4‐x/4)Mn_(3/8+7x/24)O₂ (x = 0.6, HLR) and low Li‐rich Li(Li_x/3Ni_(1/3‐x/3)Co_(1/3‐x/3)Mn_(1/3+x/3)O₂ (x = 0.24, LLR) compounds that exhibit different degrees of oxygen activation at high voltage. The measured lattice parameter changes and oxygen position show largely contrasting changes for the two cathodes where the LLR exhibits larger movement of oxygen and lattice contractions in comparison to the HLR that maintains relatively constant lattice parameters and oxygen position during the high voltage plateau until the end of charge. Density functional theory calculations show the presence of oxygen vacancy during the high voltage plateau; changes in the lattice parameters and oxygen position are consistent with experimental observations. Lithium migration kinetics for the Li‐rich material is observed under operando conditions for the first time to reveal the rate of lithium extraction from the lithium layer, and transition metal layer is related to the different charge and discharge characteristics. At the beginning of charging, the lithium extraction predominately occurs within the lithium layer. Once the high voltage plateau is reached, the lithium extraction from the lithium layer slows down and extraction from the transition metal layer evolves at a faster rate.     

High‐Temperature Treatment of Li‐Rich Cathode Materials with Ammonia: Improved Capacity and Mean Voltage Stability during Cycling

Li‐rich electrode materials of the family x Li₂MnO₃·(1?x )LiNi_a Co_b Mn_c O₂ (a + b + c = 1) suffer a voltage fade upon cycling that limits their utilization in commercial batteries despite their extremely high discharge capacity, ≈250 mA h g^?1. Li‐rich, 0.35Li₂MnO₃·0.65LiNi_0.35Mn_0.45Co_0.20O₂, is exposed to NH₃ at 400 °C, producing materials with improved characteristics: enhanced electrode capacity and a limited average voltage fade during 100 cycles in half cells versus Li. Three main changes caused by NH₃ treatment are established. First, a general bulk reduction of Co and Mn is observed via X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy and X‐ray absorption near edge structure. Next, a structural rearrangement lowers the coordination number of Co? O and Mn? O bonds, as well as formation of a surface spinel‐like structure. Additionally, Li⁺ removal from the bulk causes the formation of surface LiOH, Li₂CO₃, and Li₂O. These structural and surface changes can enhance the voltage and capacity stability of the Li‐rich material electrodes after moderate NH₃ treatment times of 1–2 h.