X-chromosome inactivation: molecular mechanisms from the human perspective

X-chromosome inactivation is an epigenetic process whereby one X chromosome is silenced in mammalian female cells. Since it was first proposed by Lyon in 1961, mouse models have been valuable tools to uncover the molecular mechanisms underlying X inactivation. However, there are also inherent differences between mouse and human X inactivation, ranging from sequence content of the X inactivation center to the phenotypic outcomes of X-chromosome abnormalities. X-linked gene dosage in males, females, and individuals with X aneuploidies and X/autosome translocations has demonstrated that many human genes escape X inactivation, implicating cis-regulatory elements in the spread of silencing. We discuss the potential nature of these elements and also review the elements in the X inactivation center involved in the early events in X-chromosome inactivation.     

X-chromosome inactivation and escape

X-chromosome inactivation, which was discovered by Mary Lyon in 1961 results in random silencing of one X chromosome in female mammals. This review is dedicated to Mary Lyon, who passed away last year. She predicted many of the features of X inactivation, for e.g., the existence of an X inactivation center, the role of L1 elements in spreading of silencing and the existence of genes that escape X inactivation. Starting from her published work here we summarize advances in the field.     

X-chromosome inactivation in development and cancer

X-chromosome inactivation represents an epigenetics paradigm and a powerful model system of facultative heterochromatin formation triggered by a non-coding RNA, Xist, during development. Once established, the inactive state of the Xi is highly stable in somatic cells, thanks to a combination of chromatin associated proteins, DNA methylation and nuclear organization. However, sporadic reactivation of X-linked genes has been reported during ageing and in transformed cells and disappearance of the Barr body is frequently observed in cancer cells. In this review we summarise current knowledge on the epigenetic changes that accompany X inactivation and discuss the extent to which the inactive X chromosome may be epigenetically or genetically perturbed in breast cancer.     

Skewed X-chromosome inactivation in human miscarriages

The sex ratio in the first trimester of pregnancy shifts toward males due to increased elimination of female embryos. One reason for this phenomenon may be disruption of X chromosome inactivation. In this paper, we have analyzed the nature of the X chromosome inactivation in extraembryonic tissues of induced and spontaneous abortuses with 46,XX karyotype. Both equiprobable and asymmetric inactivation have been found in chorionic cytotrophoblast from spontaneous and induced abortuses. In the extraembryonic mesoderm of the control group of embryos, only equiprobable inactivation has been found, whereas this parameter was shifted in 15% of spontaneous abortions. The highest incidence of the selective inactivation of one of the parent homologues was found in the group with a lack of development of embryos and embryos from women with recurrent miscarriages. One of the reasons for the observed results can be compartmentalization of cells in the blastocyst leading to the nonrandom redistribution of cells and the predominance in the inner mass of cells with an active X chromosome with aberrations incompatible with normal embryonic development.     

X-chromosome inactivation in the human cytotrophoblast

Preferential paternal X-chromosome inactivation occurs in the cell lineages that differentiate first within the female rodent blastula (trophectoderm and extraembryonic endoderm). The present studies were designed to test the nature of X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) in the earliest differentiating cell lineage of the human placenta, the cytotrophoblast. Using glucose-6-phosphate-dehydrogenase (G6PD) polymorphisms as a marker system, term placentae were obtained from 13 female heterozygotes where parental allelic contributions could be determined. Chorionic villi were enzymatically digested and centrifuged in a Percoll density gradient to isolate a pure population of cytotrophoblasts, which was ascertained by cell culture, differentiation to syncytiotrophoblasts, and histochemical staining for alpha-human chorionic gonadotrophin (alpha-HCG). On electrophoresis, all 13 samples exhibited exclusive or near exclusive expression of the maternally derived X-linked enzyme variant, regardless of whether it was G6PD A or G6PD B. No intermediate bands were seen, indicating a single active G6PD locus per cell. The stromal cells of the villi, which derive from the mesoderm and differentiate later than the cytotrophoblast, exhibit random XCI. These findings establish preferential paternal XCI in the cytotrophoblast, the cell type first to differentiate within the human blastula.     

Migrasomes: the knowns,the known unknowns and the unknown unknowns: a personal perspective

正I still remember the day. It was 2012. I was checking the transmission electron microscopy images from the previous day. Something unusual caught my eyes. A structure closely resembling an opened pomegranate stood outside a cell. In retrospect, I realized I had seen these structure before, but that particular image was unusual because there were several of these large structures outside the cell.     

Imprinted X-chromosome inactivation: enlightenment from embryos in vivo

There are two forms of X chromosome inactivation (XCI) in the laboratory mouse, random XCI in the fetus and imprinted paternal XCI limited to the extraembryonic tissues supporting the fetal life in utero. Imprinted XCI has been studied extensively because it takes place first in embryogenesis and it may hold clues to the mechanism of control of XCI in general and to the evolution of random' XCI. Classical microscopic and biochemical studies of embryos in vivo provide a basis for interpreting the multifaceted information yielded by various inventive approaches and for planning further experiments.     

X-chromosome inactivation: counting, choice and initiation

In many sexually dimorphic species, a mechanism is required to ensure equivalent levels of gene expression from the sex chromosomes. In mammals, such dosage compensation is achieved by X-chromosome inactivation, a process that presents a unique medley of biological puzzles: how to silence one but not the other X chromosome in the same nucleus; how to count the number of X's and keep only one active; how to choose which X chromosome is inactivated; and how to establish this silent state rapidly and efficiently during early development. The key to most of these puzzles lies in a unique locus, the X-inactivation centre and a remarkable RNA--Xist--that it encodes.