Prostate tumor CXC-chemokine profile correlates with cell adhesion to endothelium and extracellular matrix

Though chemokines of the CXC family are thought to play key roles in neoplastic transformation and tumor invasion, information about CXC chemokines in prostate cancer is sparse. To evaluate the involvement of CXC chemokines in prostate cancer, we analyzed the CXC coding mRNA of both chemokine ligands (CXCL) and chemokine receptors (CXCR), using the prostate carcinoma cell lines PC-3, DU-145 and LNCaP. CXCR proteins were further evaluated by Western blot, CXCR surface expression by flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. The expression pattern was correlated to adherence of the tumor cells to an endothelial cell monolayer or to extracellular matrix components. Based on growth and adhesion capacity, PC-3 and DU-145 were identified to be highly aggressive tumor cells (PC-3>DU-145), whereas LNCaP belonged to the low aggressive phenotype. CXCL1, CXCL3, CXCL5 and CXCL6 mRNA, chemokines with pro-angiogenic activity, were strongly expressed in DU-145 and PC-3, but not in LNCaP. CXCR3 and CXCR4 surface level differed in the following order: LNCaP>DU-145>PC-3. The differentiation factor, fatty acid valproic acid, induced intracellular CXCR accumulation. Therefore, prostate tumor malignancy might be accompanied by enhanced synthesis of angiogenesis stimulating CXC chemokines. Further, shifting CXCR3 and CXCR4 from the cell surface to the cytoplasm might activate pro-tumoral signalling events and indicate progression from a low to a highly aggressive phenotype.     

The role of CXC chemokines in the transition of chronic inflammation to esophageal and gastric cancer

Chronic inflammation may increase the risk to develop cancer, for instance esophagitis or gastritis may lead to development of esophageal or gastric cancer, respectively. The key molecules attracting leukocytes to local inflammatory sites are chemokines. We here provide a systematic review on the impact of CXC chemokines (binding the receptors CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3 and CXCR4) on the transition of chronic inflammation in the upper gastrointestinal tract to neoplasia. CXCR2 ligands, including GRO-α,β,γ/CXCL1,2,3, ENA-78/CXCL5 and IL-8/CXCL8 chemoattract pro-tumoral neutrophils. In addition, angiogenic CXCR2 ligands stimulate the formation of new blood vessels, facilitating tumor progression. The CXCR4 ligand SDF-1/CXCL12 also promotes tumor development by stimulating angiogenesis and by favoring metastasis of CXCR4-positive tumor cells to distant organs producing SDF-1/CXCL12. Furthermore, these angiogenic chemokines also directly enhance tumor cell survival and proliferation. In contrast, the CXCR3 ligands Mig/CXCL9, IP-10/CXCL10 and I-TAC/CXCL11 are angiostatic and attract anti-tumoral T lymphocytes and may therefore mediate tumor growth retardation and regression. Thus, chemokines exert diverging, sometimes dual roles in tumor biology as described for esophageal and gastric cancer. Therefore extensive research is needed to completely unravel the complex chemokine code in specific cancers. Possibly, chemokine-targeted cancer therapy will have to be adapted to the individual's chemokine profile.     

The role of CXC chemokines in the transition of chronic inflammation to esophageal and gastric cancer

Chronic inflammation may increase the risk to develop cancer, for instance esophagitis or gastritis may lead to development of esophageal or gastric cancer, respectively. The key molecules attracting leukocytes to local inflammatory sites are chemokines. We here provide a systematic review on the impact of CXC chemokines (binding the receptors CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3 and CXCR4) on the transition of chronic inflammation in the upper gastrointestinal tract to neoplasia. CXCR2 ligands, including GRO-α,β,γ/CXCL1,2,3, ENA-78/CXCL5 and IL-8/CXCL8 chemoattract pro-tumoral neutrophils. In addition, angiogenic CXCR2 ligands stimulate the formation of new blood vessels, facilitating tumor progression. The CXCR4 ligand SDF-1/CXCL12 also promotes tumor development by stimulating angiogenesis and by favoring metastasis of CXCR4-positive tumor cells to distant organs producing SDF-1/CXCL12. Furthermore, these angiogenic chemokines also directly enhance tumor cell survival and proliferation. In contrast, the CXCR3 ligands Mig/CXCL9, IP-10/CXCL10 and I-TAC/CXCL11 are angiostatic and attract anti-tumoral T lymphocytes and may therefore mediate tumor growth retardation and regression. Thus, chemokines exert diverging, sometimes dual roles in tumor biology as described for esophageal and gastric cancer. Therefore extensive research is needed to completely unravel the complex chemokine code in specific cancers. Possibly, chemokine-targeted cancer therapy will have to be adapted to the individual's chemokine profile.     

The role of CXC chemokine ligand 4/CXC chemokine receptor 3-B in breast cancer progression

Chemokines and their receptors participate in the development of cancers by enhancing tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis and penetration of tumor immune cells. It remains unclear whether CXC chemokine ligand 4 (CXCL4)/CXC chemokine receptor 3-B (CXCR3-B) can be used as an independent molecular marker for establishing prognosis for breast cancer patients. We evaluated CXCL4 and CXCR3-B expression in 114 breast cancer tissues and 30 matched noncancerous tissues using immunohistochemistry and western blot, and determined the correlation between their expression and clinicopathologic findings. We observed that breast cancer tissues express CXCL4 strongly and CXCR3-B weakly compared to noncancerous tissues. Strong CXCL4 expression was detected in 94.7% and weak CXCR3-B expression was detected in 78.9% of the tissues. Therefore, CXCL4/CXCR3-B might play a crucial role in breast cancer progression. We found no significant correlation between CXCL4 and age, tumor stage, tumor grade or TNM stage. CXCR3-B was associated significantly with tumor grade. Moreover, the Chi-square test of association showed that the expression of CXCL4/CXCR3-B might be an independent prognostic marker for breast cancer. Therefore, we suggest that CXCR3-B is an indicator of poor prognosis and may also be a chemotherapeutic target.     

CXCR3, a double-edged sword in tumor progression and angiogenesis

CXC chemokines are involved in chemotaxis, regulation of cell growth, induction of apoptosis and modulation of angiostatic effects. CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, CXCL4 and its variant CXCL4L1 are members of the CXC chemokine family, which bind to the CXCR3 receptor to exert their biological effects. These chemokines are associated with a variety of human diseases including chronic inflammation, immune dysfunction, cancer and metastasis. In this review, we focus on accumulating evidence demonstrating the pivotal role of CXCR3 in tumor progression. Its effects are mediated directly in tumor cells or indirectly through the regulation of angiogenesis and tumor immunity. Understanding the emerging role of CXCR3 and its signaling mechanisms further validates this receptor as a biomarker and therapeutic target for tumor progression and tumor angiogenesis.     

Chemokine receptor trio: CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 crosstalk via CXCL11 and CXCL12

Although chemokines are well established to function in immunity and endothelial cell activation and proliferation, a rapidly growing literature suggests that CXC Chemokine receptors CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR7 are critical in the development and progression of solid tumors. The effect of these chemokine receptors in tumorigenesis is mediated via interactions with shared ligands I-TAC (CXCL11) and SDF-1 (CXCL12). Over the last decade, CXCR4 has been extensively reported to be overexpressed in most human solid tumors and has earned considerable attention toward elucidating its role in cancer metastasis. To enrich the existing armamentarium of anti-cancerous agents, many inhibitors of CXCL12–CXCR4 axis have emerged as additional or alternative agents for neo-adjuvant treatments and even many of them are in preclinical and clinical stages of their development. However, the discovery of CXCR7 as another receptor for CXCL12 with rather high binding affinity and recent reports about its involvement in cancer progression, has questioned the potential of “selective blockade” of CXCR4 as cancer chemotherapeutics. Interestingly, CXCR7 can also bind another chemokine CXCL11, which is an established ligand for CXCR3. Recent reports have documented that CXCR3 and their ligands are overexpressed in different solid tumors and regulate tumor growth and metastasis. Therefore, it is important to consider the interactions and crosstalk between these three chemokine receptors and their ligand mediated signaling cascades for the development of effective anti-cancer therapies. Emerging evidence also indicates that these receptors are differentially expressed in tumor endothelial cells as well as in cancer stem cells, suggesting their direct role in regulating tumor angiogenesis and metastasis. In this review, we will focus on the signals mediated by this receptor trio via their shared ligands and their role in tumor growth and progression.     

Critical role for CXCR3 chemokine biology in the pathogenesis of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) is the major limitation to survival post-lung transplantation and is characterized by a persistent peribronchiolar inflammation that eventually gives way to airway fibrosis/obliteration. Acute rejection is the main risk factor for the development of BOS and is characterized by a perivascular/bronchiolar leukocyte infiltration. The specific mechanism(s) by which these leukocytes are recruited have not been elucidated. The CXC chemokines (monokine induced by IFN-gamma (MIG)/CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL)9, IP-10/CXCL10, and IFN-inducible T cell alpha chemoattractant (ITAC)/CXCL11) act through their shared receptor, CXCR3. Because they are potent leukocyte chemoattractants and are involved in other inflammation/fibroproliferative diseases, we hypothesized that the expression of these chemokines during an allogeneic response promotes the persistent recruitment of mononuclear cells, leading to chronic lung rejection. We found that elevated levels of MIG/CXCL9, IFN-inducible protein 10 (IP-10)/CXCL10, and ITAC/CXCL11 in human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid were associated with the continuum from acute to chronic rejection. Translational studies in a murine model demonstrated increased expression of MIG/CXCL9, IP-10/CXCL10, and ITAC/CXCL11 paralleling the recruitment of CXCR3-expressing mononuclear cells. In vivo neutralization of CXCR3 or its ligands MIG/CXCL9 and IP-10/CXCL10 decreased intragraft recruitment of CXCR3-expressing mononuclear cells and attenuated BOS. This supports the notion that ligand/CXCR3 biology plays an important role in the recruitment of mononuclear cells, a pivotal event in the pathogenesis of BOS.     

CXCL12 (SDF-1) and CXCL13 (BCA-1) chemokines significantly induce proliferation and collagen type I expression in osteoblasts from osteoarthritis patients

To evaluate the role of CXC chemokines CXCL8 (IL8), CXCL10 (IP-10), CXCL12 (SDF-1), and CXCL13 (BCA-1) in bone remodeling, we analyzed their effects on osteoblasts (OBs) obtained from subchondral trabecular bone tissue of osteoarthritis (OA) and post-traumatic (PT) patients. The expression of CXC receptors/ligands (CXCR1/CXCL8, CXCR2/CXCL8, CXCR3/CXCL10, CXCR4/CXCL12, and CXCR5/CXCL13) was analyzed in cultured OBs by flow cytometry and immunocytochemistry. Functional assays on CXC chemokine-treated-OBs in the presence or absence of their specific inhibitors were performed to analyze cellular proliferation and the enzymatic response to chemokine activation. The expression of chemokine ligands/receptors was also confirmed in bone tissue samples by immunohistochemical analysis. Collagen type I and alkaline phosphatase mRNA expression were analyzed on CXCL12- and CXCL13-treated OBs by real-time PCR. OBs from both OA and PT patients expressed high levels of CXCR3 and CXCR5 and lower amounts of CXCR1 and CXCR4. CXCL12 and CXCL13, only in OBs from OA patients, induced a significant proliferation that was also confirmed by specific blocking experiments. Moreover, OBs from OA patients released a higher amount of CXCL13 than those of PT patients while no differences were found for CXCL12. In the remodeling area of bone tissue samples, immunohistochemical analysis confirmed that OBs expressed CXCL12/CXCR4 and CXCL13/CXCR5 both in OA and PT samples. CXCL12 and CXCL13 upregulated collagen type I mRNA expression in OBs from OA patients. These data suggest that CXCL12 and CXCL13 may directly modulate cellular proliferation and collagen type I in OA patients, so contributing to the remodeling process that occurs in the evolution of this disease.     

Human osteoclasts express different CXC chemokines depending on cell culture substrate: molecular and immunocytochemical evidence of high levels of CXCL10 and CXCL12

Chemokines are important mediators of chemotaxis, cell adherence, and proliferation and exert specific functions in bone remodeling. Despite the potential intriguing role of chemokines in the regulation of osteoclast (OC) functions, little is known about the expression of chemokines and their receptors in human OCs at different stages of differentiation. Therefore, we analyzed the expression of CXC chemokine receptors (CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3, CXCR4 and CXCR5) and ligands (CXCL8, CXCL10, CXCL12 and CXCL13) both at molecular and protein levels, in human OCs grown on plastic or calcium phosphate-coated slides at different stages of differentiation. Real-time PCR showed that CXCR1, CXCR2, CXCR3, CXCR4, CXCR5 and CXCL8 were expressed in undifferentiated cells and significantly decreased during OC differentiation. By contrast, CXCL10 and CXCL12 were strongly upregulated from day 0 to day 8 in cells grown on calcium phosphate-coated slides. Immunocytochemistry showed that OCs grown on plastic expressed CXCR3, CXCR4, CXCR5, CXCL8 and CXCL12, while they were negative for CXCR1, CXCR2 and CXCL10. Interestingly, both at molecular and protein levels CXCL10 and CXCL12 significantly increased only when cells were differentiated on calcium phosphate-coated slides. These data suggest that the selection of a substrate that better mimics the tridimensional structure of bone tissue, thus favoring OC maturation and differentiation, may be necessary when studying osteoclastogenesis in vitro.     

CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand biology during lung transplant ischemia-reperfusion injury

Lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for a number of end-stage pulmonary disorders. Early lung allograft dysfunction (ischemia-reperfusion injury) continues to be the most common cause of early mortality after lung transplantation and a significant risk factor for the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Ischemia-reperfusion injury is characterized histopathologically by lung edema and a neutrophil predominate leukocyte extravasation. The specific mechanism(s) that recruit leukocytes to the lung during post-lung transplantation ischemia-reperfusion injury have not been fully elucidated. Because the ELR+ CXC chemokines are potent neutrophil chemoattractants, we investigated their role during post-lung transplantation ischemic-reperfusion injury. We found elevated levels of multiple ELR+ CXC chemokines in human bronchoalveolar lavage fluid from patients with ischemia-reperfusion injury. Proof of concept studies using a rat orthotopic lung transplantation model of "cold" ischemic-reperfusion injury demonstrated an increase in lung graft neutrophil sequestration and injury. In addition, lung expression of CXCL1, CXCL2/3, and their shared receptor CXCR2 paralleled lung neutrophil infiltration and injury. Importantly, inhibition of CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand interactions in vivo led to a marked reduction in lung neutrophil sequestration and graft injury. Taken together these experiments support the notion that increased expression of ELR+ CXC chemokines and their interaction with CXCR2 plays an important role in the pathogenesis of post-lung transplantation cold ischemia-reperfusion injury.     

Colon carcinoma cells induce CXCL11-dependent migration of CXCR3-expressing cytotoxic T lymphocytes in organotypic culture

Adoptive immunotherapy of cancer patients with cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTL) has been hampered by the inability of the CTL to home into tumors in vivo. Chemokines can attract T lymphocytes to the tumor site, as demonstrated in animal models, but the role of chemokines in T-lymphocyte trafficking toward human tumor cells is relatively unexplored. In the present study, the role of chemokines and their receptors in the migration of a colon carcinoma (CC) patient’s CTL toward autologous tumor cells has been studied in a novel three-dimensional organotypic CC culture. CTL migration was mediated by chemokine receptor CXCR3 expressed by the CTL and CXCL11 chemokine secreted by the tumor cells. Excess CXCL11 or antibodies to CXCL11 or CXCR3 inhibited migration of CTL to tumor cells. T cell and tumor cell analyses for CXCR3 and CXCL11 expression, respectively, in ten additional CC samples, may suggest their involvement in other CC patients. Our studies, together with previous studies indicating angiostatic activity of CXCL11, suggest that CXCL11 may be useful as an immunotherapeutic agent for cancer patients when transduced into tumor cells or fused to tumor antigen-specific Ab.     

The Chemokine CXCL16 and Its Receptor,CXCR6, as Markers and Promoters of Inflammation-Associated Cancers

Clinical observations and mouse models have suggested that inflammation can be pro-tumorigenic. Since chemokines are critical in leukocyte trafficking, we hypothesized that chemokines play essential roles in inflammation-associated cancers. Screening for 37 chemokines in prostate cancer cell lines and xenografts revealed CXCL16, the ligand for the receptor CXCR6, as the most consistently expressed chemokine. Immunohistochemistry and/or immunofluorescence and confocal imaging of 121 human prostate specimens showed that CXCL16 and CXCR6 were co-expressed, both on prostate cancer cells and adjacent T cells. Expression levels of CXCL16 and CXCR6 on cancer cells correlated with poor prognostic features including high-stage and high-grade, and expression also correlated with post-inflammatory changes in the cancer stroma as revealed by loss of alpha-smooth muscle actin. Moreover, CXCL16 enhanced the growth of CXCR6-expressing cancer and primary CD4 T cells. We studied expression of CXCL16 in an additional 461 specimens covering 12 tumor types, and found that CXCL16 was expressed in multiple human cancers associated with inflammation. Our study is the first to describe the expression of CXCL16/CXCR6 on both cancer cells and adjacent T cells in humans, and to demonstrate correlations between CXCL16 and CXCR6 vs. poor both prognostic features and reactive changes in cancer stoma. Taken together, our data suggest that CXCL16 and CXCR6 may mark cancers arising in an inflammatory milieu and mediate pro-tumorigenic effects of inflammation through direct effects on cancer cell growth and by inducing the migration and proliferation of tumor-associated leukocytes.     

PAK1 kinase is required for CXCL1-induced chemotaxis

The CXC subfamily of chemokines plays an important role in diverse processes, including inflammation, wound healing, growth regulation, angiogenesis, and tumorigenesis. The CXC chemokine CXCL1, or MGSA/GROalpha, is traditionally considered to be responsible for attracting leukocytes into sites of inflammation. To better understand the molecular mechanisms by which CXCL1 induces CXCR2-mediated chemotaxis, the signal transduction components involved in CXCL1-induced chemotaxis were examined. It is shown here that CXCL1 induces cdc42 and PAK1 activation in CXCR2-expressing HEK293 cells. Activation of the cdc42-PAK1 cascade is required for CXCL1-induced chemotaxis but not for CXCL1-induced intracellular Ca2+ mobilization. Moreover, CXCL1 activation of PAK1 is independent of ERK1/2 activation, a conclusion based on the observations that the inhibition of MEK-ERK activation by expression of dominant negative ERK or by the MEK inhibitor, PD98059, has no effect on CXCL1-induced PAK1 activation or CXCL1-induced chemotaxis.     

Chemokines generally exhibit scavenger receptor activity through their receptor-binding domain

Chemokines are a family of cytokines that induce directed migration of various types of leukocytes through specific interactions with a group of seven transmembrane receptors. Scavenger receptors are a heterogenous family of transmembrane molecules that commonly bind and uptake oxidized low density lipoprotein and bacteria. Here, we show that not only CXC chemokine 16 (CXCL16)/SR-PSOX, a transmembrane chemokine with scavenger receptor activity, but also 12 out of 15 chemokines examined efficiently bound scavenger receptor ligands in competition with cells expressing their specific chemokine receptors. Furthermore both the chemotactic and scavenger receptor activities of SR-PSOX/CXCL16 were similarly impaired in a series of mutants altered in the chemokine domain, indicating that SR-PSOX/CXCL16 binds scavenger receptor ligands as well as CXCR6 using highly overlapping binding motifs. Taken together, chemokines generally have scavenger receptor-like activity through their receptor-binding domain, suggesting a close evolutionary relationship between chemokines and scavenger receptors.     

Hyaluronan-based polymer scaffold modulates the expression of inflammatory and degradative factors in mesenchymal stem cells: Involvement of Cd44 and Cd54

Hyaluronan (HA), in the bone marrow stroma, is the major non-protein glycosaminoglycan component of extracellular matrix (ECM) involved in cell positioning, proliferation, differentiation as well as in receptor-mediated changes in gene expression. Repair of bone and regeneration of bone marrow is dependent on ECM, inflammatory factors, like chemokines and degradative factors, like metalloproteinases. We analyzed the interaction between human mesenchymal stem cells (h-MSCs) and a three-dimensional (3-D) HA-based scaffold in vitro. The expression of CXC chemokines/receptors, CXCL8 (IL-8)/CXCR1-2, CXCL10 (IP-10)/CXCR3, CXCL12 (SDF-1)/CXCR4, and CXCL13 (BCA-1)/CXCR5, and metalloproteinases/inhibitors MMP-1, MMP-3, MMP-13/TIMP-1 were evaluated in h-MSCs grown on plastic or on HA-based scaffold by Real-time PCR, ELISA, and immunocytochemical techniques. Moreover, the expression of two HA receptors, CD44 and CD54, was analyzed. We found both at mRNA and protein levels that HA-based scaffold induced the expression of CXCR4, CXCL13, and MMP-3 and downmodulated the expression of CXCL12, CXCR5, MMP-13, and TIMP-1 while HA-based scaffold induced CD54 expression but not CD44. We found that these two HA receptors were directly involved in the modulation of CXCL12, CXCL13, and CXCR5. This study demonstrates a direct action of a 3-D HA-based scaffold, widely used for cartilage and bone repair, in modulating both h-MSCs inflammatory and degradative factors directly involved in the engraftment of specific cell types in a damaged area. Our data clearly demonstrate that HA in this 3-D conformation acts as a signaling molecule for h-MSCs.     

CXCR6/CXCL16 functions as a regulator in metastasis and progression of cancer

Metastasis is considered the obvious mark for most aggressive cancers. However, little is known about the molecular mechanism of the regulation of cancer metastasis. Recent evidence increasingly suggests that the interaction between chemokines and chemokine receptors is pivotal in the process of metastasis. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12, for example, have been reported to play a vital role in cancer metastasis. Another chemokine and chemokine receptor pair, the CXCL16/CXCR6 axis, has been studied by several independent research groups. Here, we summarize recent advances in our knowledge of the function of CXC chemokine receptor CXCR6 and its ligand CXCL16 in regulating metastasis and invasion of cancer. CXCR6 and CXCL16 are up-regulated in multiple cancer tissue types and cancer cell lines relative to normal tissues and cell lines. In addition, both CXCR6 and CXCL16 levels increase as tumor malignancy increases. Trans-membranous CXCL16 chemokine reduces proliferation while soluble CXCL16 chemokine enhances proliferation and migration. TM-CXCL16 functions as an inducer for lymphocyte build-up around tumor sites. High trans-membranous CXCL16 expression correlates with a good prognosis. Moreover, the Akt/mTOR signal pathway is involved in activating the CXCR6/CXCL16 axis. These findings suggest multiple opportunities for blocking the CXCR6/CXCL16 axis and the Akt/mTOR signal pathway in novel cancer therapies.     

Overexpression of CXCL10 in human prostate LNCaP cells activates its receptor (CXCR3) expression and inhibits cell proliferation

Chronic or recurrent inflammation plays a role in the development of many types of cancer including prostate cancer. CXCL10 (interferon-gamma inducible protein-10, IP-10) is a small secretory protein of 8.7 kDa. Recently, it has been shown that normal prostate epithelial (PZ-HPV-7) cells produce lower amounts of angiogenic CXC chemokines (GRO-alpha, IL-8) and higher amounts of angiostatic chemokines (CXCL10, CXCL11) as compared to prostate cancer cells (CA-HPV-10 and PC-3). Accordingly, we studied the effects of overexpression of CXCL10 in human prostate cancer LNCaP cells. LNCaP cells were transiently transfected with CXCL10 cDNA in pIRES2-EGFP vector. CXCL10, CXCR3, PSA and G3PDH mRNA levels were determined by semi-quantitative conventional and quantitative real-time RT-PCR and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS). The expression of CXCL10 was markedly enhanced in the transfected cells at mRNA and protein levels in the cells. Overexpression of CXCL10 inhibited cell proliferation of the transfected cells by 30%-40% in serum-limited medium (1% FCS in RPMI1640 medium) and decreased PSA production. CXCR3 expression was significantly induced by the overexpression of CXCL10 as determined by RT-PCR and FACS. These results indicated that CXCL10 inhibited LNCaP cell proliferation and decreased PSA production by up-regulation of CXCR3 receptor. CXCL10 may be potentially useful in the treatment of prostate cancer.     

The role of CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand biological axis in renal cell carcinoma

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for 3% of new cancer incidence and mortality in the United States. Studies in RCC have predominantly focused on VEGF in promoting tumor-associated angiogenesis. However, other angiogenic factors may contribute to the overall angiogenic milieu of RCC. We hypothesized that the CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand biological axis represents a mechanism by which RCC cells promote angiogenesis and facilitate tumor growth and metastasis. Therefore, we first examined tumor biopsies and plasma of patients with metastatic RCC for levels of CXCR2 ligands, and RCC tumor biopsies for the expression of CXCR2. The proangiogenic CXCR2 ligands CXCL1, CXCL3, CXCL5, and CXCL8, as well as VEGF were elevated in the plasma of these patients and found to be expressed within the tumors. CXCR2 was found to be expressed on endothelial cells within the tumors. To assess the role of ELR(+) CXC chemokines in RCC, we next used a model of syngeneic RCC (i.e., RENCA) in BALB/c mice. CXCR2 ligand and VEGF expression temporally increased in direct correlation with RENCA growth in CXCR2(+/+) mice. However, there was a marked reduction of RENCA tumor growth in CXCR2(-/-) mice, which correlated with decreased angiogenesis and increased tumor necrosis. Furthermore, in the absence of CXCR2, orthotopic RENCA tumors demonstrated a reduced potential to metastasize to the lungs of CXCR2(-/-) mice. These data support the notion that CXCR2/CXCR2 ligand biology is an important component of RCC tumor-associated angiogenesis and tumorigenesis.     

Towards in situ tissue repair: human mesenchymal stem cells express chemokine receptors CXCR1, CXCR2 and CCR2, and migrate upon stimulation with CXCL8 but not CCL2

The recruitment of bone marrow CD34- mesenchymal stem- and progenitor cells (MSC) and their subsequent differentiation into distinct tissues is the precondition for in situ tissue engineering. The objective of this study was to determine the entire chemokine receptor expression profile of human MSC and to investigate their chemotactic response to the selected chemokines CCL2, CXCL8 and CXCL12. Human MSC were isolated from iliac crest bone marrow aspirates and showed a homogeneous population presenting a typical MSC-related cell surface antigen profile (CD14-, CD34-, CD44+, CD45-, CD166+, SH-2+). The expression profile of all 18 chemokine receptors was determined by real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry. Both methods consistently demonstrated that MSC express CC, CXC, C and CX(3)C receptors. Gene expression and immunohistochemical analysis documented that MSC express chemokine receptors CCR2, CCR8, CXCR1, CXCR2 and CXCR3. A dose-dependent chemotactic activity of CXCR4 and CXCR1/CXCR2 ligands CXCL12 and CXCL8 (interleukin-8) was demonstrated using a 96-well chemotaxis assay. In contrast, the CCR2 ligand CCL2 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, MCP-1) did not recruited human MSC. In conclusion, we report that the chemokine receptor expression profile of human MSC is much broader than known before. Furthermore, for the first time, we demonstrate that human MSC migrate upon stimulation with CXCL8 but not CCL2. In combination with already known data on MSC recruitment and differentiation these are promising results towards in situ regenerative medicine approaches based on guiding of MSC to sites of degenerated tissues.