Topography of intermediates in transcription initiation of E.coli

Three characteristic footprinting patterns resulted from probing the Escherichia coli RNA polymerase T7 A1 promoter complex by hydroxyl radicals in the temperature range between 4 degrees C and 37 degrees C. These were attributed to the closed complex, the intermediate complex and the open complex. In the closed complex, the RNA polymerase protects the DNA only at one side over five helical turns. In the intermediate complex, the range of the protected area is extended further downstream by two helical turns. This region of the DNA helix is fully protected, indicating that the RNA polymerase wraps around the DNA between base positions -13 and +20. In the open complex, a stretch between base positions -7 and +2, which was fully protected in the intermediate complex, becomes accessible towards hydroxyl radicals but only in the codogenic strand, indicating that the DNA strands are unwound. Our data suggest that only the DNA downstream of the promoter is involved in this unwinding process.     

Open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: the mechanism of polymerase-induced strand separation of double helical DNA

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is able to site-specifically melt 12 bp of promoter DNA at temperatures far below those normally associated with DNA melting. Here we consider several models to explain how RNA polymerase destabilizes duplex DNA. One popular model proposes that upon binding to the promoter, RNA polymerase untwists the spacer DNA between the –10 and –35 regions, which results in a destabilization of the –10 region at a TA base step where melting initiates. Promoter untwisting may result, in part, from extensive wrapping of the DNA around RNA polymerase. Formation of the strand-separated open complex appears to be facilitated by specific protein-DNA interactions which occur predominantly on the non-template strand. Recent evidence suggests that these include important contacts with Sigma factor region 2.3, which we propose binds the displaced single strand of DNA.     

Identification of close contacts between the sigma N (sigma 54) protein and promoter DNA in closed promoter complexes.

The complexes forming between the alternative sigma factor protein sigma N (sigma 54), its holoenzyme and promoter DNA were analysed using the hydroxyl radical probe and by photochemical footprinting of bromouridine-substituted DNA. Close contacts between the promoter, sigma N and its holoenzyme appear to be restricted predominantly to one face of the DNA helix, extending from -31 to -5. They all appear attributable to sigma N and no extra close contacts from the core RNA polymerase subunits in the holoenzyme-promoter DNA complex were detected. We suggest that the apparent absence of close core RNA polymerase contacts in the region of the promoter DNA to be melted during open complex formation is important for maintaining the closed complex. Results of the hydroxyl radical footprinting imply that sigma N makes multiple DNA backbone contacts across and beyond the -12, -24 consensus promoter elements, and the photochemical footprints indicate that consensus thymidine residues contribute important major groove contacts to sigma N. Formation of the open complex is shown to involve a major structural transition in the DNA contacted by sigma N, establishing a direct role for sigma N in formation of the activated promoter complex.     

Mutation-induced changes in RNA polymerase-lac ps promoter interactions

A composite rate assay has been applied to investigate the rate and mechanism of formation of open promoter complexes. Seven DNA templates were studied which were related to the lac ps promoter by single base pair changes in the -10 or -35 region of promoter sequence homology. These small changes induce a nearly 3 order of magnitude variation in the rate of open complex formation. This variation persists over a wide range of concentrations of RNA polymerase. Nevertheless, all promoters direct open complex formation which proceeds through a "closed" or A polymerase:DNA complex which dissociates readily. These data, when taken together with our previous results on the lac "spacer" mutations, demonstrate that mutation of the lac ps promoter leads to changes in the rate of open complex formation predicted by the following rule. Changes which substitute a less conserved element of sequence in the -10 and -35 regions, or of length in the spacer, always decrease the rate in this homologous series of promoters.     

Promoter recognition by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Role of the spacer DNA in functional complex formation

The available evidence suggests that during the process of formation of a functional or "open" complex at a promoter, Escherichia coli RNA polymerase transiently realigns the two contacted regions of the promoter, thus stressing the intervening spacer DNA. We tested the possibility that this process plays an active role in the formation of an open complex. Two series of promoters were examined: one with spacer DNAs of 15 to 19 base-pairs and a derivative for which the promoters additionally contained a one-base gap in the spacer, so as to relieve any stress imposed on the DNA. Consistent with an active role for the stressed DNA in driving open complex formation, we have found that for promoters with a 17-base-pair spacer, the presence of a gap leads to a delay in the formation of an open complex, at a step subsequent to the initial binding of RNA polymerase to the promoter. The results with the other gapped promoters rule out direct binding of RNA polymerase to the region of the gap and indicate an increased flexibility in the gapped DNA. As not all observations with the spacer length series of gapped and ungapped promoters can be interpreted in terms of an active role of the spacer DNA without additional assumptions, such a role must still be considered tentative.     

Dissection of two hallmarks of the open promoter complex by mutation in an RNA polymerase core subunit

Deletion of 10 evolutionarily conserved amino acids from the beta subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase leads to a mutant enzyme that is unable to efficiently hold onto DNA. Open promoter complexes formed by the mutant enzyme are in rapid equilibrium with closed complexes and, unlike the wild-type complexes, are highly sensitive to the DNA competitor heparin (Martin, E., Sagitov, V., Burova, E., Nikiforov, V., and Goldfarb, A. (1992) J. Biol. Chem. 267, 20175-20180). Here we show that despite this instability, the mutant enzyme forms partially open complexes at temperatures as low as 0 degrees C when the wild-type complex is fully closed. Thus, the two hallmarks of the open promoter complex, the stability toward a challenge with DNA competitors and the sensitivity toward low temperature, can be uncoupled by mutation and may be independent in the wild-type complex. We use the high resolution structure of Thermus aquaticus RNA polymerase core to build a functional model of promoter complex formation that accounts for the observed defects of the E. coli RNA polymerase mutants.     

The intercalating beta-hairpin of T7 RNA polymerase plays a role in promoter DNA melting and in stabilizing the melted DNA for efficient RNA synthesis

Phage T7 RNA polymerase contains within its single polypeptide all the elements for specific recognition and melting of its promoter DNA. Crystallographic studies indicate that a beta-hairpin (230-245) with an intercalating valine residue plays a role in promoter opening. We mutated V237 to several amino acids, deleted five amino acid residues at the tip of the hairpin, and mutated E242 and D240 at the base of the hairpin to define the roles of the tip and base of the hairpin in DNA strand separation. The affinity of the hairpin mutants for the promoter DNA was not significantly affected. Stopped-flow kinetic studies showed that the bimolecular rate of DNA binding and the observed rate of pre-initiation open complex formation that corresponds to the sum of DNA opening and closing steps were within 20 to 40 % of the wild-type polymerase. Yet, most mutants showed a smaller amount of the pre-initiation open complex at equilibrium, indicating that the individual rates of promoter opening and closing steps were altered in the mutants. The base mutants, E242A and D240A, showed both a lower rate of promoter opening and a higher rate of promoter closing, suggesting their role in stabilization of the open complex. The V237D and the deletion mutant showed mainly a lower rate of promoter opening, suggesting that the tip of the hairpin may nucleate DNA opening. The defect in pre-initiation open complex formation affected downstream steps such as the rate of the first phosphodiester bond formation step, but did not affect significantly the apparent K(d) of initiating GTPs. We propose that D240 and E242 anchor the hairpin to the DNA and position the tip of the hairpin to allow V237 to intercalate and distort the DNA during open complex formation. The interactions of E242 and D240 with the upstream junction of the melted dsDNA promoter also align the template strand within the active site for efficient RNA synthesis.     

Peculiar 2-aminopurine fluorescence monitors the dynamics of open complex formation by bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase

The kinetics of promoter binding and open complex formation in bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase was investigated using 2-aminopurine (2-AP) modified promoters. 2-AP serves as an ideal probe to measure the kinetics of open complex formation because its fluorescence is sensitive to both base-unpairing and base-unstacking and to the nature of the neighboring bases. All four 2-AP bases in the TATA box showed an increase in fluorescence with similar kinetics upon binding to the T7 RNA polymerase, indicating that the TATA sequence becomes unpaired in a concerted manner. The 2-AP at -4 showed a peculiarly large increase in fluorescence upon binding to the T7 RNA polymerase. Based on the recent crystal structure of the T7 RNA polymerase-DNA complex, we propose that the large fluorescence increase is due to unstacking of the 2-AP base at -4 from the guanine at -5, during open complex formation. The unstacking may be a critical event in directing and placing the template strand correctly in the T7 RNA polymerase active site upon promoter melting for template directed RNA synthesis. Based on equilibrium fluorescence and stopped-flow kinetic studies, we propose that a fast form of T7 RNA polymerase binds promoter double-stranded DNA by a three-step mechanism. The initial collision complex or a closed complex, ED(c) is formed with a K(d) of 1.8 microm. This complex isomerizes to an open complex, ED(o1), in an energetically unfavorable reaction with an equilibrium constant of 0.12. The ED(o1) further isomerizes to a more stable open complex, ED(o2), with a rate constant around 300 s(-1). Thus, in the absence of the initiating nucleotide, GTP, the overall equilibrium constant for closed to open complex conversion is 0.5 and the net rate of open complex formation is nearly 150 s(-1).