Kinetics of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin with one thiophosphorylated head

Actin-activated MgATPase of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin is activated by thiophosphorylation of two regulatory light chains, one on each head domain. To understand cooperativity between heads, we examined the kinetics of heavy meromyosin (HMM) with one thiophosphorylated head. Proteolytic gizzard heavy meromyosin regulatory light chains were partially exchanged with recombinant thiophosphorylated His-tagged light chains, and HMM with one thiophosphorylated head was isolated by nickel-affinity chromatography. In vitro motility was observed. By steady-state kinetic analysis, one-head thiophosphorylated heavy meromyosin had a similar K(m) value for actin but a V(max) value of approximately 50% of the fully thiophosphorylated molecule. However, single turnover analysis, which is not sensitive to small amounts of active heads, showed that one-head thiophosphorylated heavy meromyosin was 46-120 times more active than unphosphorylated HMM but only 7-19% as active as the fully thiophosphorylated molecule. Discrepancy between the single turnover and steady-state values could be explained by a small fraction of rigor heads. These rigor heads would have a large effect on the steady-state kinetics of one-head thiophosphorylated HMM. In summary, thiophosphorylation of one head leads to a molecule with unique intermediate kinetics suggesting that thiophosphorylation of one head cooperatively alters the kinetics of the partner head and vice versa.     

ADP binding induces an asymmetry between the heads of unphosphorylated myosin

Light chain phosphorylation is the key event that regulates smooth and non-muscle myosin II ATPase activity. Here we show that both heads of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (HMM) bind tightly to actin in the absence of nucleotide, irrespective of the state of light chain phosphorylation. In striking contrast, only one of the two heads of unphosphorylated HMM binds to actin in the presence of ADP, and the heads have different affinities for ADP. This asymmetry suggests that phosphorylation alters the mechanical coupling between the heads of HMM. A model that incorporates strain between the two heads is proposed to explain the data, which have implications for how one head of a motor protein can gate the response of the other.     

The interaction between the regulatory light chain domains on two heads is critical for regulation of smooth muscle myosin

Recent findings have suggested that the interaction between the two heads is critical for phosphorylation-dependent regulation of smooth muscle myosin. We hypothesized that the interaction between the two regulatory light chains on two heads of myosin dictates the regulation of myosin motor function. To evaluate this notion, we engineered and characterized smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (HMM), which is composed of one entire HMM heavy chain and one motor domain truncated heavy chain containing the S2 rod and regulatory light chain (RLC) binding site, as well as the bound RLC (SMDHMM). SMDHMM was inactive for both actin-translocating activity and actin-activated ATPase activity in the dephosphorylated state, demonstrating that the interaction between the two RLC domains on the two heads and/or a motor domain and a RLC domain in a distinct head is sufficient for the inhibition of smooth muscle myosin motor activity. When phosphorylated, SMDHMM was activated for both actin-translocating activity and actin-activated ATPase activity; however, these activities were lower than those of double-headed HMM, implying partial release of inhibition by phosphorylation in SMDHMM and/or cooperativity between the two heads of smooth muscle myosin. The present results indicate that the RLC domain is critical for phosphorylation-dependent regulation of smooth muscle myosin motor activity. On the other hand, similar to double-headed HMM, SMDHMM showed both "folded" and "extended" conformations, and the ratio of those conformations is dependent on ionic strength, suggesting that the RLC domain is sufficient to regulate the conformational transition in myosin.     

Two-headed binding of the unphosphorylated nonmuscle heavy meromyosin.ADP complex to actin

The enzymatic and motor function of smooth muscle and nonmuscle myosin II is activated by phosphorylation of the regulatory light chains located in the head portion of myosin. Dimerization of the heads, which is brought about by the coiled-coil tail region, is essential for regulation since single-headed fragments are active regardless of the state of phosphorylation. Utilizing the fluorescence signal on binding of myosin to pyrene-labeled actin filaments, we investigated the interplay of actin and nucleotide binding to thiophosphorylated and unphosphorylated recombinant nonmuscle IIA heavy meromyosin constructs. We show that both heads of either thiophosphorylated or unphosphorylated heavy meromyosin bind very strongly to actin (K(d) < 10 nM) in the presence or absence of ADP. The heads have high and indistinguishable affinities for ADP (K(d) around 1 microM) when bound to actin. These findings are in line with the previously observed unusually loose coupling between nucleotide and actin binding to nonmuscle myosin IIA subfragment-1 (Kovács et al. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278, 38132.). Furthermore, they imply that the structure of the two heads in the ternary actomyosin-ADP complex is symmetrical and that the asymmetrical structure observed in the presence of ATP and the absence of actin in previous investigations (Wendt et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 4361) is likely to represent an ATPase intermediate that precedes the actomyosin-ADP state.     

Asymmetric photocross-linking of singly phosphorylated smooth muscle heavy meromyosin

Although activities of smooth muscle myosin are regulated by phosphorylation, the molecular mechanisms of regulation have not been fully established. Phosphorylation of both heads of myosin is known to activate ATPase and motor activities, but the effects of phosphorylation of only one of the heads have not been established. Such information on singly phosphorylated myosin can serve to elucidate the molecular mechanism of the phosphorylation-dependent regulation. To understand the structural properties of the singly phosphorylated state, we prepared singly phosphorylated heavy meromyosin (HMM) containing a photoreactive benzophenone-labeled RLC and examined its photocross-linking reactivity. The two heads in the singly phosphorylated HMM showed different reactivities. The dephosphorylated RLC in the singly phosphorylated HMM was cross-linked to a heavy chain, like that in the dephosphorylated HMM, whereas the phosphorylated RLC did not react, like that in the fully phosphorylated HMM. These results indicate that the two heads of the singly phosphorylated HMM have an asymmetric structure, suggesting that phosphorylation of one head can to some extent activate smooth muscle HMM.     

Structures of smooth muscle myosin and heavy meromyosin in the folded, shutdown state

Remodelling the contractile apparatus within smooth muscle cells allows effective contractile activity over a wide range of cell lengths. Thick filaments may be redistributed via depolymerisation into inactive myosin monomers that have been detected in vitro, in which the long tail has a folded conformation. Using negative stain electron microscopy of individual folded myosin molecules from turkey gizzard smooth muscle, we show that they are more compact than previously described, with heads and the three segments of the folded tail closely packed. Heavy meromyosin (HMM), which lacks two-thirds of the tail, closely resembles the equivalent parts of whole myosin. Image processing reveals a characteristic head region morphology for both HMM and myosin, with features identifiable by comparison with less compact molecules. The two heads associate asymmetrically: the tip of one motor domain touches the base of the other, resembling the blocked and free heads of this HMM when it forms 2D crystals on lipid monolayers. The tail of HMM lies between the heads, contacting the blocked motor domain, unlike in the 2D crystal. The tail of whole myosin is bent sharply and consistently close to residues 1175 and 1535. The first bend position correlates with a skip in the coiled coil sequence, the second does not. Tail segments 2 and 3 associate only with the blocked head, such that the second bend is near the C-lobe of the blocked head regulatory light chain. Quantitative analysis of tail flexibility shows that the single coiled coil of HMM has an apparent Young's modulus of about 0.5 GPa. The folded tail of the whole myosin is less flexible, indicating interactions between the segments. The folded tail does not modify the compact head arrangement but stabilises it, indicating a structural mechanism for the very low ATPase activity of the folded molecule.     

Two functional heads are required for full activation of smooth muscle myosin

The motor activity of smooth muscle myosin II is regulated by the regulatory light chain phosphorylation, but it is not understood how phosphorylation activates motor activity. To address this question, we produced asymmetric heavy meromyosin (HMM), which is composed of a wild-type (WT) heavy chain and a mutant heavy chain having no motor activity (i.e. S236T or G457A). The actin-activated ATPase activities (Vmax) of asymmetric HMMs were only 21.8 and 8.4% of the wild-type HMM for S236A/WT HMM and G456A/WT HMM, respectively. If the two heads of HMM are independent for their ATPase activities, asymmetric HMM should show 50% of the activity of wild-type HMM; however, the activity of asymmetric HMM was much lower than the expected value. The results suggest that the activity of the wild-type head is attenuated by the presence of inactive head. Consistently, the actin-gliding velocity of the asymmetric HMM (i.e. S236T/WT or G457A/WT) was less than one-fifth of the wild-type HMM. The present study supports an idea that the two heads of smooth muscle myosin II interact with each other and the presence of two active heads is required for full activation.     

Effect of phosphorylation on the binding of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin X ADP to actin

Relaxation of both smooth and skeletal muscles appears to be caused primarily by inhibition of the step associated with Pi release in the actomyosin ATPase cycle, rather than by a block in the binding of the myosin X ATP and myosin X ADP X Pi complexes to actin. In skeletal muscle, troponin-tropomyosin not only causes marked inhibition of Pi release, but it also markedly inhibits the binding of myosin subfragment-1 X ADP to actin, raising the possibility that the two phenomena are coupled in some way. In the present study we determined whether phosphorylation of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (HMM) also affects both the binding of HMM X ADP to actin and the Pi release step. This was done by having phosphorylated and unphosphorylated HMM X ADP compete for sites on F-actin. At mu = 30 mM, phosphorylation increased the affinity of the HMM molecule for actin about 12-fold and at mu = 170 mM, there was less than a 3-fold increase in the affinity of HMM. If phosphorylation affects the binding of each head of HMM to the same extent, then phosphorylation caused about a 4- and 2-fold increase in the affinity of each head of HMM for actin at mu = 30 and 170 mM, respectively. In contrast, at both ionic strengths, phosphorylation caused more than 100-fold actin activation of the ATPase activity of smooth muscle HMM. Therefore, the marked activation of Pi release in the acto X HMM ATPase cycle upon phosphorylation of HMM is not accompanied by a comparable increase in the affinity of HMM X ADP for actin. We have also found that phosphorylation increases by only 4-fold the rate of Pi release from HMM alone. These results suggest that in smooth muscle, phosphorylation accelerates the step associated with the release of Pi both in the forward and the reverse direction without correspondingly affecting the binding of myosin X ADP to actin.     

Phosphorylation of a single head of smooth muscle myosin activates the whole molecule

Regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation activates smooth and non-muscle myosin II, but it has not been established if phosphorylation of one head turns on the whole molecule. Baculovirus expression and affinity chromatography were used to isolate heavy meromyosin (HMM) containing one phosphorylated and one dephosphorylated RLC (1-P HMM). Motility and steady-state ATPase assays indicated that 1-P HMM is nearly as active as HMM with two phosphorylated heads (2-P HMM). Single-turnover experiments further showed that both the dephosphorylated and phosphorylated heads of 1-P HMM can be activated by actin. Singly phosphorylated full-length myosin was also an active species with two cycling heads. Our results suggest that phosphorylation of one RLC abolishes the asymmetric inhibited state formed by dephosphorylated myosin [Liu, J., et al. (2003) J. Mol. Biol. 329, 963-972], allowing activation of both the phosphorylated and dephosphorylated heads. These findings help explain how smooth muscles are able to generate high levels of stress with low phosphorylation levels.     

The binding of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin to actin in the presence of ATP. Effect of phosphorylation

Phosphorylation of the 20,000-dalton light chains of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (HMM) from turkey gizzards results in a large increase in the actin-activated MgATPase activity over that observed with unphosphorylated HMM. In an attempt to define which step in the kinetic cycle is affected by phosphorylation, we have measured the binding of both unphosphorylated and phosphorylated HMM to actin in the presence of ATP using sedimentation. There was only a 4-fold difference in the actin binding constants of unphosphorylated HMM (5.35 x 10(3) M-1) and fully phosphorylated HMM (2.35 x 10(4) M-1). In contrast, the maximum rate of the actin-activated MgATPase activity (Vmax) of phosphorylated HMM was 25 times greater than that for unphosphorylated HMM. These data rule out a mechanism whereby the unphosphorylated light chain of myosin regulates actin-myosin interaction by directly or indirectly blocking the binding of HMM to actin. This implies that some step in the kinetic cycle other than the binding of HMM to actin must be regulated. We have also measured the rate constant for ATP hydrolysis (the initial phosphate burst) under the same conditions and found that this step was very fast compared to the steady state ATPase rate and was unaffected by phosphorylation. This suggests that the step which is regulated by phosphorylation is either phosphate release or a step preceding phosphate release but following ATP hydrolysis.     

H(2)O(2)-induced kinetic and chemical modifications of smooth muscle myosin: correlation to effects of H(2)O(2) on airway smooth muscle

The effect of H(2)O(2) on smooth muscle heavy meromyosin (HMM) and subfragment 1 (S1) was examined. The number of molecules that retained the ability to bind ATP and the actinactivated rate of P(i) release were measured by single-turnover kinetics. H(2)O(2) treatment caused a decrease in HMM regulation from 800- to 27-fold. For unphosphorylated and phosphorylated heavy meromyosin and for S1, approximately 50% of the molecules lost the ability to bind to ATP. H(2)O(2) treatment in the presence of EDTA protected against ATPase inactivation and against the loss of total ATP binding. Inactivation of S1 versus time correlated to a loss of reactive thiols. Treatment of H(2)O(2)-inactivated phosphorylated HMM or S1 with dithiothreitol partially reactivated the ATPase but had no effect on total ATP binding. H(2)O(2)-inactivated S1 contained a prominent cross-link between the N-terminal 65-kDa and C-terminal 26-kDa heavy chain regions. Mass spectral studies revealed that at least seven thiols in the heavy chain and the essential light chain were oxidized to cysteic acid. In thiophosphorylated porcine tracheal muscle strips at pCa 9 + 2.1 mM ATP, H(2)O(2) caused a approximately 50% decrease in the amplitude but did not alter the rate of force generation, suggesting that H(2)O(2) directly affects the force generating complex. Dithiothreitol treatment reversed the H(2)O(2) inhibition of the maximal force by approximately 50%. These data, when compared with the in vitro kinetic data, are consistent with a H(2)O(2)-induced loss of functional myosin heads in the muscle.     

Refined model of the 10S conformation of smooth muscle myosin by cryo-electron microscopy 3D image reconstruction

The actin-activated ATPase activity of smooth muscle myosin and heavy meromyosin (smHMM) is regulated by phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain (RLC). Complete regulation requires two intact myosin heads because single-headed myosin subfragments are always active. 2D crystalline arrays of the 10S form of intact myosin, which has a dephosphorylated RLC, were produced on a positively charged lipid monolayer and imaged in 3D at 2.0 nm resolution by cryo-electron microscopy of frozen, hydrated specimens. An atomic model of smooth muscle myosin was constructed from the X-ray structures of the smooth muscle myosin motor domain and essential light chain and a homology model of the RLC was produced based on the skeletal muscle S1 structure. The initial model of the 10S myosin, based on the previous reconstruction of smHMM, was subjected to real space refinement to obtain a quantitative fit to the density. The smHMM was likewise refined and both refined models reveal the same asymmetric interaction between the upper 50 kDa domain of the "blocked" head and parts of the catalytic, converter domains and the essential light chain of the "free" head observed previously. This observation suggests that this interaction is not simply due to crystallographic packing but is enforced by elements of the myosin heads. The 10S reconstruction shows additional alpha-helical coiled-coil not seen in the earlier smHMM reconstruction, but the location of one segment of S2 is the same in both.     

Smooth Muscle Heavy Meromyosin Phosphorylated on One of Its Two Heads Supports Force and Motion

Smooth muscle myosin is activated by regulatory light chain (RLC) phosphorylation. In the unphosphorylated state the activity of both heads is suppressed due to an asymmetric, intramolecular interaction between the heads. The properties of myosin with only one of its two RLCs phosphorylated, a state likely to be present both during the activation and the relaxation phase of smooth muscle, is less certain despite much investigation. Here we further characterize the mechanical properties of an expressed heavy meromyosin (HMM) construct with only one of its RLCs phosphorylated (HMM-1P). This construct was previously shown to have more than 50% of the ATPase activity of fully phosphorylated myosin (HMM-2P) and to move actin at the same speed in a motility assay as HMM-2P (Rovner, A. S., Fagnant, P. M., and Trybus, K. M. (2006) Biochemistry 45, 5280–5289). Here we show that the unitary step size and attachment time to actin of HMM-1P is indistinguishable from that of HMM-2P. Force-velocity measurements on small ensembles show that HMM-1P can generate approximately half the force of HMM-2P, which may relate to the observed duty ratio of HMM-1P being approximately half that of HMM-2P. Therefore, single-phosphorylated smooth muscle HMM molecules are active species, and the head associated with the unphosphorylated RLC is mechanically competent, allowing it to make a substantial contribution to both motion and force generation during smooth muscle contraction.Myosin motors are involved in a diverse array of actin-based cellular functions including muscle contraction, cargo transport, and cytokinesis. To accomplish any of these processes successfully, there needs to be strict control of when the motor is activated and when it is turned “off.” Smooth muscle myosin, which powers smooth muscle contraction in both vascular and visceral tissues, is no exception, and the mechanism by which it is regulated has been studied for many years (for review, see Ref. 2). Smooth muscle myosin is activated when the calcium-calmodulin-myosin light chain kinase complex phosphorylates Ser-19 of the regulatory light chain (RLC)² bound to the neck of the myosin head. In the unphosphorylated state, smooth muscle myosin is unable to move actin, and the actomyosin ATPase activity is rate-limited by phosphate release so that the motor can only weakly interact with actin in the M·ADP·P_i state (3).Early studies characterized the inhibited state of myosin at physiologic ionic strength as a species that sedimented at 10 S in the ultracentrifuge, indicating that the rod must adopt a compact conformation (4, 5). Consistent with the hydrodynamic studies, metal-shadowed images showed a structure with the rod bent into nearly equal thirds and heads bent back toward the rod (6). Higher resolution cryoelectron microscopic images of two-dimensional arrays of unphosphorylated HMM revealed an asymmetric intramolecular interaction between the heads called the “blocked” and “free” heads that proposed a molecular basis for inhibition (7). The actin binding domain of the blocked head interacts with the converter domain of the free head, so that the blocked head cannot bind actin and be actin-activated. The free head is prevented from progressing through its ATPase cycle because rotation of the converter domain cannot occur due to the binding of the blocked head, and thus, the free head is locked in a weak binding state (7). These asymmetric head interactions were also observed by single particle analysis of negatively stained images of smooth muscle myosin (8). This motif appears to be a general mechanism widely used by class II myosins to maintain a relaxed or inhibited state, as it was also observed in native striated muscle myosin thick filaments from tarantula, which are regulated by phosphorylation (9), as well as in striated myosins from both vertebrates and invertebrates (10).RLC phosphorylation abolishes these interactions, allowing both heads to freely interact with actin (7, 11). Although these two endpoints are well characterized, much less is agreed upon with regard to smooth muscle myosin that has only one of its two RLCs phosphorylated. RLC phosphorylation by myosin light chain kinase is random (12–14), so myosin with only one phosphorylated RLC is a predominant species during muscle activation and perhaps during relaxation. The hydrolytic and mechanical activity of this state has been investigated for decades. In the early studies, the activity of single-phosphorylated myosin was inferred from ensemble measurements in which it existed in a mixture with both unphosphorylated and double-phosphorylated myosin. Some of these studies suggested that it has less than half the actin-activated ATPase activity of the double-phosphorylated state (15, 16), whereas others suggested that both the hydrolytic and actin filament motility was approximately half (17, 18). The former studies imply that the activation of one head does not activate the whole molecule, whereas the latter was consistent with each head acting independently of its partner.Recently, the approach to this problem has been improved by employing various methods that allow isolation of a single-phosphorylated species (1, 19, 20). Single-phosphorylated heavy meromyosin (HMM) had much less than half the hydrolytic and mechanical activity of double-phosphorylated HMM when prepared using light chain exchange or stripping protocols (19, 20). Using differential tagging of constructs expressed in Sf9 cells followed by sequential affinity columns, the single-phosphorylated HMM (HMM-1P) had more than half the ATPase activity and actin filament speeds in the in vitro motility assay that were similar to double-phosphorylated HMM (1).Here, we further characterize the mechanical properties of the expressed HMM-1P construct. An optical trap assay was used to show that the unitary step size and attachment time of an expressed single HMM-1P molecule was indistinguishable from that of double-phosphorylated HMM (HMM-2P) (1), suggesting that at least one of the heads of HMM-1P is equivalent to a head of HMM-2P. The optical trap was further used to characterize the force-velocity relationship for a small ensemble of HMM-1P molecules (21). These data showed that HMM-1P can generate approximately half the force of HMM-2P, which may relate to the observed duty ratio of HMM-1P being approximately half that of HMM-2P. The results are discussed in terms of two mechanisms that cannot be distinguished from one another based on the current data. The ability of HMM-1P to generate motion and force implies that it likely contributes to smooth muscle contraction both during activation at low phosphorylation levels as well as in maintaining tension when phosphorylation levels start to decline.     

Phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin heads regulates the head-induced movement of tropomyosin

It has been shown that skeletal and smooth muscle myosin heads binding to actin results in the movement of smooth muscle tropomyosin, as revealed by a change in fluorescence resonance energy transfer between a fluorescence donor on tropomyosin and an acceptor on actin (Graceffa, P. (1999) Biochemistry 38, 11984-11992). In this work, tropomyosin movement was similarly monitored as a function of unphosphorylated and phosphorylated smooth muscle myosin double-headed fragment smHMM. In the absence of nucleotide and at low myosin head/actin ratios, only phosphorylated heads induced a change in energy transfer. In the presence of ADP, the effect of head phosphorylation was even more dramatic, in that at all levels of myosin head/actin, phosphorylation was necessary to affect energy transfer. It is proposed that the regulation of tropomyosin position on actin by phosphorylation of myosin heads plays a key role in the regulation of smooth muscle contraction. In contrast, actin-bound caldesmon was not moved by myosin heads at low head/actin ratios, as uncovered by fluorescence resonance energy transfer and disulfide cross-linking between caldesmon and actin. At higher head concentration caldesmon was dissociated from actin, consistent with the multiple binding model for the binding of caldesmon and myosin heads to actin (Chen, Y., and Chalovich, J. M. (1992) Biophys. J. 63, 1063-1070).     

Two new modes of smooth muscle myosin regulation by the interaction between the two regulatory light chains, and by the S2 domain

Previous studies indicated that single-headed smooth muscle myosin and S1 (a single head fragment) are not regulated through phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain (RLC). To investigate the importance of the double-headedness of myosin and of the S2 region for the phosphorylation-dependent regulation, we made three types of recombinant mutant smooth muscle HMMs with one intact head and an N-terminally truncated head. The truncated head of Delta MD lacked the motor domain, that of Delta(MD+ELC) lacked the motor and essential light chain binding domains, and single-headed HMM had one intact head alone. The basal ATPase activities of the three mutants decreased as the KCl concentration became less than 0.1 M. Such a decrease was not observed for S1, which had no S2 region, suggesting that S2 is necessary for this myosin behavior. This activity decrease also disappeared when RLCs of Delta MD and Delta(MD+ELC), but that of single-headed HMM, were phosphorylated. When their RLCs were unphosphorylated, the three mutants exhibited similar actin-activated ATPase levels. However, when they were phosphorylated, the actin-activated ATPase activities of Delta MD and Delta(MD+ELC) increased to the S1 level, while that of single-headed HMM remained unchanged. Even in the phosphorylated state, the actin-activated ATPase activities of the three mutants and S1 were much lower than that of wild-type HMM. We propose that S2 has an inhibitory function that is canceled by an interaction between two phosphorylated RLCs. We also propose that a cooperative interaction between two motor domains is required for a higher level of actin activation.     

Myosin light chain phosphatase activities and the effects of phosphatase inhibitors in tonic and phasic smooth muscle.

Phosphatase inhibitors microcystin-LR, tautomycin, and okadaic acid caused contraction and increased 20-kDa myosin light chain (MLC20) phosphorylation in Ca(2+)-free solutions in both phasic and tonic smooth muscle permeabilized with beta-escin, and inhibited the heavy meromyosin (HMM) phosphatase activity of smooth muscle homogenates with the same potency sequence: microcystin-LR greater than tautomycin greater than okadaic acid. The sensitivity to all three inhibitors was significantly higher, the half-times of relaxation and dephosphorylation were 4-6 times longer, and the HMM phosphatase and MLC20 kinase activity/smooth muscle cell wet weight was 2.0- and 1.9-fold lower in the tonic, femoral artery, than in the phasic, ileum or portal vein, smooth muscle. Preincubation with 0.2 microM inhibitor-2 decreased the HMM phosphatase activity by 35% in the ileum and by 60% in the femoral artery. The results suggest that the HMM phosphatases of smooth muscle have properties common to type 1 protein phosphatases, but are inhibited only partially by high concentrations of inhibitor-2, and that the lower HMM phosphatase activity of tonic smooth muscle may contribute to its greater sensitivity to phosphatase inhibitors and its slower rate of relaxation.     

Regulation of the function of mammalian myosin and its conformational change

It has been known that the phosphorylation of the regulatory light chain, residing at the head/rod junction of the molecule activates the motor activity of smooth muscle and non-muscle conventional myosin (myosin II), and triggers a large conformational change of the molecule from the inhibited folded conformation to the active extended conformation. Recent structural analysis has revealed the structural basis of the inhibition of the motor function of the two heads in the inhibited conformation. On the other hand, recent studies have revealed that a processive unconventional myosin, myosin V, also shows a large change in the conformation from the folded to an extended form and this explains the activation mechanism of myosin V motor activity. These findings suggest the presence of a common scenario for the regulation of motor protein functions.     

Modeling Smooth Muscle Myosin's Two Heads: Long-Lived Enzymatic Roles and Phosphorylation-Dependent Equilibria

Smooth muscle myosin has two heads, each capable of interacting with actin to generate force and/or motion as it hydrolyzes ATP. These heads are inhibited when their associated regulatory light chain is unphosphorylated (0P), becoming active and hydrolyzing ATP maximally when phosphorylated (2P). Interestingly, with only one of the two regulatory light chains phosphorylated (1P), smooth muscle myosin is active but its ATPase rate is <2P. To explain published 1P single ATP turnover and steady-state ATPase activities, we propose a kinetic model in which 1P myosin exists in an equilibrium between being fully active (2P) and inhibited (0P). Based on the single ATP turnover data, we also propose that each 2P head adopts a hydrolytic role distinct from its partner at any point in time, i.e., one head strongly binds actin and hydrolyzes ATP at its actin-activated rate while the other weakly binds actin. Surprisingly, the heads switch roles slowly (<0.1 s⁻¹), suggesting that their activities are not independent. The phosphorylation-dependent equilibrium between active and inhibited states and the hydrolytic role that each head adopts during its interaction with actin may have implications for understanding regulation and mechanical performance of other members of the myosin family of molecular motors.     

The apparently negatively cooperative phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin at low ionic strength is related to its filamentous state

The correlation curve between phosphorylation and MgATPase activity suggests that the 20,000-dalton light chain of both heads of a smooth muscle myosin or heavy meromyosin (HMM) molecule must be phosphorylated before the MgATPase activity of either head can be activated by actin. The two heads of HMM appear to be phosphorylated randomly at equal rates, while those of myosin are phosphorylated in a negatively cooperative manner (Persechini, A., and Hartshorne, D.J. (1981) Science, 213, 1383-1385; Ikebe, M., Ogihara, S., and Tonomura, Y. (1982) J. Biochem. 91, 1809-1812). We have investigated the cause of this difference between HMM and myosin. We find that if myosin is first phosphorylated at high ionic strength (0.6 M KCl), where it is monomeric, and then assayed for MgATPase activity (in 0.05 M KCl), the data support a model where the two heads are phosphorylated randomly with equal rates (i.e. similarly to HMM). The correlation curves between MgATPase activity and dephosphorylation of fully phosphorylated myosin, both in a filamentous and monomeric state, are also best explained by a model where dephosphorylation of one head is sufficient to deactivate the entire molecule. With monomeric myosin, the dephosphorylation appears to occur randomly with equal rates, whereas with filamentous myosin the dephosphorylation appears to be negatively cooperative. The correlation between dephosphorylation of HMM and its MgATPase activity is more complex and is consistent with a positively cooperative dephosphorylation. Direct analyses of the time courses of phosphorylation of HMM and monomeric myosin show that a single exponential is sufficient to fit the data through greater than 90% of the reaction. However, when phosphorylation is carried out at low ionic strength (0.02 M KCl), where myosin is present as filaments, the time course consists of two exponential functions where the rate constant for the phosphorylation of one myosin head is 6-10 times greater than that for the other head which is located on the same molecule. This suggests that when myosin is polymerized into filaments the two previously indistinguishable heads either become nonequivalent or are subject to head-head interactions leading to a negatively cooperative phosphorylation reaction.     

The rigor configuration of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin trapped by a zero-length cross-linker

When chicken gizzard heavy meromyosin (HMM) in its rigor complex with actin was reacted with the zero-length cross-linker 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide (EDC), HMM cross-linked with actin but also the two heads of the HMM molecule cross-linked to each other [Onishi, H., Maita, T., Matsuda, G., & Fujiwara, K. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 1898-1904, 1905-1912]. By ultracentrifugal fractionation of the EDC-treated acto-HMM in the presence of Mg-ATP, we obtained a preparation enriched for gizzard HMM with cross-linked heads. When HMM molecules in this preparation were rotary-shadowed and observed in an electron microscope, many head pairs were in contact with each other. The amount of HMM with cross-linked heads determined by electron microscopy was equal to that of the cross-linked NH2-terminal 24K tryptic fragments of HMM heavy chains determined by NaDodSO4 gel electrophoresis, indicating that this cross-linking is primarily responsible for the contact observed between two HMM heads. Most pairs of the contacted heads originated in the same HMM molecule, although a few pairs belonged to different HMM molecules. Cross-linking between the two heads of the same HMM molecule appeared to occur within the distal, more globular half of each head. However, the cross-linking sites were located at different positions within the globular portion. The actin-activated Mg-ATPase activity of the HMM sample treated with EDC in the presence of actin increased in a biphasic manner, depending on the concentration of F-actin, with two apparent association constants: 2.9 x 10(4) M-1 and one much less than 1 x 10(4) M-1. Since the apparent association constant obtained with the HMM control was similar to the latter value, the association constant for HMM molecules with cross-linked heads was identified to be the former value. The binding of HMM to actin was thus strengthened at least by a factor of 3 by the cross-linking between two HMM heads. These results suggest that HMM heads are trapped by treatment with EDC in the rigor complex configuration and that this configuration is retained even after the HMM has been released from actin. The EDC reactivity of rabbit skeletal muscle HMM, however, was different from that of chicken gizzard HMM. The treatment of acto-HMM complexes with EDC did not generate cross-linking between two skeletal muscle HMM heads.