The alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis assay with mouse multiple organs: results with 30 aromatic amines evaluated by the IARC and U.S. NTP

The genotoxicity of 30 aromatic amines selected from IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer) groups 1, 2A, 2B and 3 and from the U.S. NTP (National Toxicology Program) carcinogenicity database were evaluated using the alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (SCG) (Comet) assay in mouse organs. We treated groups of four mice once orally at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and sampled stomach, colon, liver, kidney, bladder, lung, brain, and bone marrow 3, 8 and 24 h after treatment. For the 20 aromatic amines that are rodent carcinogens, the assay was positive in at least one organ, suggesting a high predictive ability for the assay. For most of the SCG-positive aromatic amines, the organs exhibiting increased levels of DNA damage were not necessarily the target organs for carcinogenicity. It was rare, in contrast, for the target organs not to show DNA damage. Organ-specific genotoxicity, therefore, is necessary but not sufficient for the prediction of organ-specific carcinogenicity. For the 10 non-carcinogenic aromatic amines (eight were Ames test-positive and two were Ames test-negative), the assay was negative in all organs studied. In the safety evaluation of chemicals, it is important to demonstrate that Ames test-positive agents are not genotoxic in vivo. Chemical carcinogens can be classified as genotoxic (Ames test-positive) and putative non-genotoxic (Ames test-negative) carcinogens. The alkaline SCG assay, which detects DNA lesions, is not suitable for identifying non-genotoxic carcinogens. The present SCG study revealed a high positive response ratio for rodent genotoxic carcinogens and a high negative response ratio for rodent genotoxic non-carcinogens. These results suggest that the alkaline SCG assay can be usefully used to evaluate the in vivo genotoxicity of chemicals in multiple organs, providing for a good assessment of potential carcinogenicity.     

The unique role of rodents in the detection of possible human carcinogens and mutagens

Some of the probable reasons underlying the observation that not all chemicals shown to be genotoxic in vitro are capable of eliciting tumours in rodents or humans are discussed using appropriate examples. It is suggested that a substantial proportion of the resources currently available for conducting rodent carcinogenicity bioassays should be employed in the short-term evaluation in vivo of some of the many hundreds of chemicals recently defined as genotoxic in vitro, rather than in the protracted evaluation of a few chemicals, often of unknown activity in vitro, for carcinogenicity. A decision tree approach to the evaluation of chemicals for human mutagenic/carcinogenic potential is presented which is at variance with the construction and philosophy of many of the current legislative guidelines. The immediate need for the adoption of one of the available short-term in vivo liver assays, and/or the development of a short-term in vivo rodent assay capable of concomitantly monitoring different genetic end-points in a range of organs or tissues is emphasized.     

Structural basis of carcinogenicity in rodents of genotoxicants and non-genotoxicants

A set of 189 chemicals tested in the National Toxicology Program Cancer Bioassay was subjected to analysis by CASE, the Computer-Automated Structure Evaluation system. In the data set, 63% of the chemicals were carcinogens, approx. 40% of the carcinogens were non-genotoxic, i.e., they possessed neither "structural alerts" for DNA reactivity as defined by Ashby and Tennant, 1988, nor were they mutagenic for Salmonella. The data base can be characterized as a "combined rodent" compilation as chemicals were characterized as "carcinogenic" if they were carcinogenic in either rats or mice or both. CASE identified 23 fragments which accounted for the carcinogenicity, or lack thereof, of most of the chemicals. The sensitivity and specificity were unexpectedly high: 1.00 and 0.86, respectively. Based upon the identified biophores and biophobes, CASE performed exceedingly well in predicting the activity of chemicals not included among the 189 in the original set. CASE predicted correctly the carcinogenicity of non-genotoxic carcinogens thereby suggesting a structural commonality in the action of this group of carcinogens. As a matter of fact biophores restricted to non-genotoxic carcinogens were identified as were "non-electrophilic" biophores shared by genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens. The findings suggest that the CASE program may help in the elucidation of the basis of the action of non-genotoxic carcinogens.     

ECVAM prevalidation study on in vitro cell transformation assays: general outline and conclusions of the study

The potential for a compound to induce carcinogenicity is a key consideration when ascertaining hazard and risk assessment of chemicals. Among the in vitro alternatives that have been developed for predicting carcinogenicity, in vitro cell transformation assays (CTAs) have been shown to involve a multistage process that closely models important stages of in vivo carcinogenesis and have the potential to detect both genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens. These assays have been in use for decades and a substantial amount of data demonstrating their performance is available in the literature. However, for the standardised use of these assays for regulatory purposes, a formal evaluation of the assays, in particular focusing on development of standardised transferable protocols and further information on assay reproducibility, was considered important to serve as a basis for the drafting of generally accepted OECD test guidelines. To address this issue, a prevalidation study of the CTAs using the BALB/c 3T3 cell line, SHE cells at pH 6.7, and SHE cells at pH 7.0 was coordinated by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM) and focused on issues of standardisation of protocols, test method transferability and within- and between-laboratory reproducibility. The study resulted in the availability of standardised protocols that had undergone prevalidation [1,2]. The results of the ECVAM study demonstrated that for the BALB/c 3T3 method, some modifications to the protocol were needed to obtain reproducible results between laboratories, while the SHE pH 6.7 and the SHE pH 7.0 protocols are transferable between laboratories, and results are reproducible within- and between-laboratories. It is recommended that the BALB/c 3T3 and SHE protocols as instituted in this prevalidation study should be used in future applications of these respective transformation assays. To support their harmonised use and regulatory application, the development of an OECD test guideline for the SHE CTAs, based on the protocol published in this issue, is recommended. The development of an OECD test guideline for the BALB/c 3T3 CTA should likewise be further pursued upon the availability of additional supportive data and improvement of the statistical analysis.     

Prevalence of genotoxic chemicals among animal and human carcinogens evaluated in the IARC Monograph series.

To determine whether genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens contribute similarly to the cancer burden in humans, an analysis was performed on agents that were evaluated in Supplements 6 and 7 to the IARC Monographs for their carcinogenic effects in humans and animals and for the activity in short-term genotoxicity tests. The prevalence of genotoxic carcinogens on four groups of agents, consisting of established human carcinogens (group 1, n = 30), probable human carcinogens (group 2A, n = 37), possible human carcinogens (group 2B, n = 113) and on agents with limited evidence of carcinogenicity in animals (a subset of group 3, n = 149) was determined. A high prevalence in the order of 80 to 90% of genotoxic carcinogens was found in each of the groups 1, 2A and 2B, which were also shown to be multi-species/multi-tissues carcinogens. The distribution of carcinogenic potency in rodents did not reveal any specific characteristic of the human carcinogens in group 1 that would differentiate them from agents in groups 2A, 2B and 3. The results of this analysis indicate that (a) an agent with unknown carcinogenic potential showing sufficient evidence of activity in in vitro/in vivo genotoxicity assays (involving as endpoints DNA damage and chromosomal/mutational damage) may represent a hazard to humans; and b) an agent showing lack of activity in this spectrum of genotoxicity assays should undergo evaluation for carcinogenicity by rodent bioassay, in view of the present lack of validated short-term tests for non-genotoxic carcinogens. Overall, this analysis implies that genotoxic carcinogens add more to the cancer burden in man than non-genotoxic carcinogens. Thus, identification of such genotoxic carcinogens and subsequent lowering of exposure will remain the main goal for primary cancer prevention in man.     

Prediction of a carcinogenic potential of rat hepatocarcinogens using toxicogenomics analysis of short-term in vivo studies

The carcinogenic potential of chemicals is currently evaluated with rodent life-time bioassays, which are time consuming, and expensive with respect to cost, number of animals and amount of compound required. Since the results of these 2-year bioassays are not known until quite late during development of new chemical entities, and since the short-term test battery to test for genotoxicity, a characteristic of genotoxic carcinogens, is hampered by low specificity, the identification of early biomarkers for carcinogenicity would be a big step forward. Using gene expression profiles from the livers of rats treated up to 14 days with genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens we previously identified characteristic gene expression profiles for these two groups of carcinogens. We have now added expression profiles from further hepatocarcinogens and from non-carcinogens the latter serving as control profiles. We used these profiles to extract biomarkers discriminating genotoxic from non-genotoxic carcinogens and to calculate classifiers based on the support vector machine (SVM) algorithm. These classifiers then predicted a set of independent validation compound profiles with up to 88% accuracy, depending on the marker gene set. We would like to present this study as proof of the concept that a classification of carcinogens based on short-term studies may be feasible.     

Mutagenic activity of carcinogens detected in transgenic rodent mutagenicity assays at dose levels used in chronic rodent cancer bioassays

Data on transgenic rodent mutagenicity of five human carcinogens were summarised and compared with the results from rodent carcinogenicity studies. Four out of five carcinogens showed mutagenic activity already at daily dose levels which induced cancer in long-term rodent bioassays in at least one target tissue of carcinogenesis. In several of these studies, even single dose applications were sufficient to significantly increase the mutation frequency in vivo. Other genotoxic carcinogens required application of multiple dosing at dose-levels used in rodent cancer bioassays to show their in vivo mutagenicity. A rodent respiratory tract carcinogen, 1,2-dibromoethane (DBE), following inhalation exposure, displayed no mutagenic activity, neither in lung nor in nasal mucosa, at a single 2-h exposure to 30 ppm, which is below the highest concentration used in a NTP cancer bioassay. In contrast, after multiple treatment for 10 days at the same daily doses, a significant increase of the mutation frequency in nasal mucosa was apparent. We conclude, that especially when studying new chemicals in these transgenic rodent mutation assays, a multiple dosing protocol should be preferred. For dose selection, the same criteria could be applied as for chronic rodent bioassays.     

Investigating the Different Mechanisms of Genotoxic and Non-Genotoxic Carcinogens by a Gene Set Analysis

Based on the process of carcinogenesis, carcinogens are classified as either genotoxic or non-genotoxic. In contrast to non-genotoxic carcinogens, many genotoxic carcinogens have been reported to cause tumor in carcinogenic bioassays in animals. Thus evaluating the genotoxicity potential of chemicals is important to discriminate genotoxic from non-genotoxic carcinogens for health care and pharmaceutical industry safety. Additionally, investigating the difference between the mechanisms of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens could provide the foundation for a mechanism-based classification for unknown compounds. In this study, we investigated the gene expression of HepG2 cells treated with genotoxic or non-genotoxic carcinogens and compared their mechanisms of action. To enhance our understanding of the differences in the mechanisms of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens, we implemented a gene set analysis using 12 compounds for the training set (12, 24, 48 h) and validated significant gene sets using 22 compounds for the test set (24, 48 h). For a direct biological translation, we conducted a gene set analysis using Globaltest and selected significant gene sets. To validate the results, training and test compounds were predicted by the significant gene sets using a prediction analysis for microarrays (PAM). Finally, we obtained 6 gene sets, including sets enriched for genes involved in the adherens junction, bladder cancer, p53 signaling pathway, pathways in cancer, peroxisome and RNA degradation. Among the 6 gene sets, the bladder cancer and p53 signaling pathway sets were significant at 12, 24 and 48 h. We also found that the DDB2, RRM2B and GADD45A, genes related to the repair and damage prevention of DNA, were consistently up-regulated for genotoxic carcinogens. Our results suggest that a gene set analysis could provide a robust tool in the investigation of the different mechanisms of genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens and construct a more detailed understanding of the perturbation of significant pathways.     

Genomic Models of Short-Term Exposure Accurately Predict Long-Term Chemical Carcinogenicity and Identify Putative Mechanisms of Action

Background

Despite an overall decrease in incidence of and mortality from cancer, about 40% of Americans will be diagnosed with the disease in their lifetime, and around 20% will die of it. Current approaches to test carcinogenic chemicals adopt the 2-year rodent bioassay, which is costly and time-consuming. As a result, fewer than 2% of the chemicals on the market have actually been tested. However, evidence accumulated to date suggests that gene expression profiles from model organisms exposed to chemical compounds reflect underlying mechanisms of action, and that these toxicogenomic models could be used in the prediction of chemical carcinogenicity.

Results

In this study, we used a rat-based microarray dataset from the NTP DrugMatrix Database to test the ability of toxicogenomics to model carcinogenicity. We analyzed 1,221 gene-expression profiles obtained from rats treated with 127 well-characterized compounds, including genotoxic and non-genotoxic carcinogens. We built a classifier that predicts a chemical''s carcinogenic potential with an AUC of 0.78, and validated it on an independent dataset from the Japanese Toxicogenomics Project consisting of 2,065 profiles from 72 compounds. Finally, we identified differentially expressed genes associated with chemical carcinogenesis, and developed novel data-driven approaches for the molecular characterization of the response to chemical stressors.

Conclusion

Here, we validate a toxicogenomic approach to predict carcinogenicity and provide strong evidence that, with a larger set of compounds, we should be able to improve the sensitivity and specificity of the predictions. We found that the prediction of carcinogenicity is tissue-dependent and that the results also confirm and expand upon previous studies implicating DNA damage, the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor, the aryl hydrocarbon receptor, and regenerative pathology in the response to carcinogen exposure.     

The mouse spot test. Evaluation of its performance in identifying chemical mutagens and carcinogens

The published results on 60 chemicals and X-rays investigated in the mouse spot test were compared with data on the same chemicals tested in the bacterial mutation assay (Ames test) and lifetime rodent bioassays. The performance of the spot test as an in vivo complementary assay to the in vitro bacterial mutagenesis test reveals that of 60 agents, 38 were positive in both systems, 6 were positive only in the spot test, 10 were positive only in the bacterial test and 6 were negative in both assays. The spot test was also considered as a predictor of carcinogenesis; 45 chemicals were carcinogenic of which 35 were detected as positive by the spot test and 3 out of 6 non-carcinogens were correctly identified as negative. If the results are regarded in sequence, i.e. that a positive result in a bacterial mutagenicity test reveals potential that may or may not be realized in vivo, then 48 chemicals were mutagenic in the bacterial mutation assay of which 38 were active in the spot test and 31 were confirmed as carcinogens in bioassays. 12 chemicals were non-mutagenic to bacteria of which 6 gave positive responses in the spot test and 5 were confirmed as carcinogens. These results provide strong evidence that the mouse coat spot test is an effective complementary test to the bacterial mutagenesis assay for the detection of genotoxic chemicals and as a confirmatory test for the identification of carcinogens. The main deficiency at present is the paucity of data from the testing of non-carcinogens. With further development and improvement of the test it is probable that the predictive performance of the assay in identifying carcinogens should improve, since many of the false negative responses may be due to inadequate testing.     

Animal carcinogenicity studies: 2. Obstacles to extrapolation of data to humans

Due to limited human exposure data, risk classification and the consequent regulation of exposure to potential carcinogens has conventionally relied mainly upon animal tests. However, several investigations have revealed animal carcinogenicity data to be lacking in human predictivity. To investigate the reasons for this, we surveyed 160 chemicals possessing animal but not human exposure data within the US Environmental Protection Agency chemicals database, but which had received human carcinogenicity assessments by 1 January 2004. We discovered the use of a wide variety of species, with rodents predominating, and of a wide variety of routes of administration, and that there were effects on a particularly wide variety of organ systems. The likely causes of the poor human predictivity of rodent carcinogenicity bioassays include: 1) the profound discordance of bioassay results between rodent species, strains and genders, and further, between rodents and human beings; 2) the variable, yet substantial, stresses caused by handling and restraint, and the stressful routes of administration common to carcinogenicity bioassays, and their effects on hormonal regulation, immune status and predisposition to carcinogenesis; 3) differences in rates of absorption and transport mechanisms between test routes of administration and other important human routes of exposure; 4) the considerable variability of organ systems in response to carcinogenic insults, both between and within species; and 5) the predisposition of chronic high dose bioassays toward false positive results, due to the overwhelming of physiological defences, and the unnatural elevation of cell division rates during ad libitum feeding studies. Such factors render profoundly difficult any attempts to accurately extrapolate human carcinogenic hazards from animal data.     

Evaluation of the GreenScreen GADD45alpha-GFP indicator assay with non-proprietary and proprietary compounds

The GreenScreen GADD45alpha indicator assay has been assessed for its concordance with in vitro genotoxicity and rodent carcinogenicity bioassay data. To test robustness, sensitivity, and specificity of the assay, 91 compounds with known genotoxicity results were screened in a blinded manner. Fifty seven of the compounds were classified as in vitro genotoxic whereas 34 were non-genotoxic. Out of the 91 compounds, 50 had been tested in 2-year carcinogenicity assays, with 33 identified to be rodent carcinogens and 17 non-carcinogens. Gadd45alpha assay sensitivity and specificity for genotoxicity was 30% and 97%, respectively (17/57 and 33/34), whereas its sensitivity and specificity for rodent carcinogenicity was 30% and 88%, respectively (10/33 and 15/17). Gadd45alpha assay genotoxicity results from this validation study exhibited a high concordance with previously published results as well as for compound test results generated at two different sites (91%, 19/21), indicating that the assay is both robust and reproducible. In conclusion, results from this blinded and independent validation study indicate that the GreenScreen GADD45 indicator assay is reproducible and reliable with low sensitivity and high specificity for identifying genotoxic and carcinogenic compounds.     

Lack of micronuclei formation in bone marrow of rats after repeated oral exposure to nickel sulfate hexahydrate

Workplace exposures to mixtures of nickel compounds have been associated with excess respiratory cancer risk. Animal studies with individual nickel compounds indicate that not all nickel substances have the same potency or potential to induce tumors. The bioavailability of nickel ions at critical cellular sites seems to be important to determine the potential of a substance to induce tumors in animals, but much less is understood about the exact nature (genotoxic or non-genotoxic) of the nickel effects. Within many regulatory frameworks (e.g., European Union), substances are classified for mutagenicity based on the available data and this classification will often influence the mode of action assigned to carcinogenic substances and the way in which risk assessment will be conducted. The objective of this study was to evaluate the ability of nickel sulfate hexahydrate to induce micronuclei in polychromatic erythrocytes (PCEs) in rat bone marrow. This study was conducted according to OECD and EU protocol guidelines. In the dose range-finding assays, the maximum tolerated dose was estimated to be 500 mg/kg/day. The doses used in the micronucleus assay were 125, 250, and 500 mg/kg/day. At least 2000 PCEs per animal were analyzed for micronuclei in PCEs. Cytotoxicity was assessed by scoring a minimum of 500 consecutive total polychromatic (PCE) and normochromatic (NCE) erythrocytes (PCE/NCE ratio). Nickel sulfate hexahydrate did not induce statistically significant increases in micronucleated PCEs at any dose examined. The negative results in the present study contribute significantly to the weight of evidence evaluation of the mutagenicity (chromosomal level) of nickel substances. These results are consistent with a non-genotoxic mode of action for soluble nickel that could explain the enhancement of cancer risk seen among refinery workers with mixed exposures and its lack of carcinogenicity in animal studies with single exposures.     

Use of a cell transformation assay with established cell lines, and a metabolic cooperation assay with V79 cells for the detection of tumour promoters: a review

Extensive studies on the safety evaluation of chemicals have indicated that a considerable number of non-genotoxic chemicals are carcinogenic. Tumour promoters are likely to be among these non-genotoxic carcinogens, and their detection is considered to be an important approach to the prevention of cancer. In this review, the results are summarised for in vitro transformation assays involving established cell lines, and for an assay for inhibition of gap junctional intercellular communication for the detection of tumour promoters, which involves V79 cells. Although the number of chemicals examined is still too small to permit a full evaluation of the correlation between in vitro cell transformation and in vivo carcinogenicity, it is clear that the sensitivity of the focus formation assay is very high. In the case of the metabolic cooperation assay, the sensitivity appears to be rather poor, but the assay can be considered to be useful because of its simple procedure and its considerable database. These in vitro assays for tumour promoters are recommended as useful tools for the detection of non-genotoxic carcinogens.     

Validation of a genotoxicity test based on p53R2 gene expression in human lymphoblastoid cells

Genotoxicity assessment is important for predicting the carcinogenicity of chemical substances. p53R2 is a p53-regulated gene that is induced by various genotoxic stresses. We previously developed a p53R2-dependent luciferase reporter gene assay in the MCF-7 human breast adenocarcinoma cell line, and demonstrated its ability to detect genotoxic agents. In this paper, we investigate the applicability of the p53R2-based genotoxicity test in the human lymphoblastoid cell line TK6. TK6 cells that express wild-type p53 have been widely used for genetic toxicology studies. To evaluate the performance of the test system in TK6 cells, we referred to 61 of the chemicals on the list of 20 genotoxic and 42 non-genotoxic chemicals recommended for the evaluation of modified or new mammalian cell genotoxicity tests by the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods. The overall accordance, sensitivity, and specificity of our results with the ECVAM list were 90% (55/61), 85% (17/20), and 93% (38/41), respectively. These results indicate that the p53R2-based genotoxicity test can detect various types of genotoxic chemicals without compromising its specificity. This test will be a valuable tool for rapid screen for identifying chemicals that may be genotoxic to humans.     

Early indicators of potential neoplasia produced in the rat forestomach by non-genotoxic agents: the importance of induced cellular proliferation

Forestomach neoplasia induced by the apparently non-genotoxic carcinogens, butylated hydroxyanisole and propionic acid, appears to arise by way of sustained high levels of cellular proliferation. Several other inducers of enhanced cellular proliferation, or the consequential incidence of hyperplastic lesions, have been identified in the rodent forestomach but the requisite carcinogenicity bioassays remain undone. In other tissues, such as the male rat kidney, the rodent thyroid follicular cell and the bladder epithelium, there is also evidence supporting the concept that sustained enhanced cellular proliferation may be an important early marker for non-genotoxic carcinogens. This reaction is, however, not likely to be the only marker necessary for the identification of non-genotoxic carcinogens.     

Rodent tumor profiles, Salmonella mutagenicity and risk assessment

The tumorigenesis profiles of 116 chemicals, which proved to induce cancer in the NCI/NTP experimentation, were studied by multivariate data analysis methods. Three main patterns of tumor induction were evident. One chemical (benzene) was not classifiable in any of the 3 clusters of chemicals. The carcinogen classes based on patterns of tumor induction did not reflect a repartition between Ames-positive and Ames-negative chemicals. Therefore any classification of carcinogens as either 'primary' (genotoxic, hence assumed to pose a greater risk) or 'secondary' (presumably carcinogenic via non-genotoxic mechanisms) would seem to be a subject for research and speculation, and, for the present, an unsuitable basis for risk assessment.     

International Commission for Protection against Environmental Mutagens and Carcinogens. ICPEMC working paper No. 5. Genotoxicity tests as predictors of carcinogens: an analysis

Differences between the results of numerical validation studies comparing in vitro and in vivo genotoxicity tests with the rodent cancer bioassay are leading to the perception that short-term tests predict carcinogenicity only with uncertainty. Consideration of factors such as the pharmacokinetic distribution of chemicals, the systems available for metabolic activation and detoxification, the ability of the active metabolite to move from the site of production to the target DNA, and the potential for expression of the induced lesions, strongly suggests that the disparate sensitivity of the different test systems is a major reason why numerical validation is not more successful. Furthermore, genotoxicity tests should be expected to detect only a subset of carcinogens, namely genotoxic carcinogens, rather than those carcinogens that appear to act by non-genetic mechanisms. Instead of relying primarily on short-term in vitro genotoxicity tests to predict carcinogenic activity, these tests should be used in a manner that emphasizes the accurate determination of mutagenicity or clastogenicity. It must then be determined whether the mutagenic activity is further expressed as carcinogenicity in the appropriate studies using test animals. The prospects for quantitative extrapolation of in vitro or in vivo genotoxicity test results to carcinogenicity requires a much more precise understanding of the critical molecular events in both processes.     

Synergy between systemic toxicity and genotoxicity: relevance to human cancer risk

The health risk manager and policy analyst must frequently make recommendations based upon incomplete toxicity data. This is a situation which is encountered in the evaluation of human carcinogenic risks as animal cancer bioassay results are often not available. In this study, in order to assess the relevance of other possible indicators of carcinogenic risks, we used the "chemical diversity approach" to estimate the magnitude of the human carcinogenic risk based upon Salmonella mutagenicity and systemic toxicity data of the "universe of chemicals" to which humans have the potential to be exposed. Analyses of the properties of 10,000 agents representative of the "universe of chemicals" suggest that chemicals that have genotoxic potentials as well as exhibiting greater systemic toxicity are more likely to be carcinogens than non-genotoxicants or agents that exhibit lesser toxicity. Since "genotoxic" carcinogenicity is a hallmark of recognized human carcinogens, these findings are relevant to human cancer risk assessment.