Patterning of the head in hydra as visualized by a monoclonal antibody, II. The initiation and localization of head structures in regenerating pieces of tissue

The body column of hydra is polarized such that a new head will regenerate from the apical end when both extremities are removed. This is due to a graded property of the tissue termed the head activation gradient. The aim of the experiments presented here was to determine what events connect a two-dimensional segment of the activation gradient in an isolated piece of tissue with the formation of a head structure at a particular location. To this end, tissue pieces with three different shapes were excised and analyzed during and after regeneration. The most apical tissue of each piece was labeled with the DNA-intercalating dye, DAPI, and the area where developmental changes were occurring was monitored using the monoclonal antibody CP8 (Javois et al., 1986). First, it was shown that polarity of regeneration was maintained regardless of the fraction of body length included in the excised pieces. Second, while head structures usually formed from the original apical tissue, they could be located anywhere in the regenerate. This was an effect of the healing process which shaped the apical edge differently in different pieces. Third, early CP8 binding occurred in similarly shaped areas suggesting that patterning events were initiated in a contiguous manner wherever apical tissue was located. And finally, not all of the CP8-marked tissue successfully formed structures. Apparently some regions were favored to continue the patterning process, and these in turn extinguished the process in neighboring regions.     

Head activator does not qualitatively alter head morphology in regenerates ofHydra oligactis

Summary The characterization of head activator (HA) as a morphogen capable of increasing the number of tentacles regenerated by hydra was re-examined. Gastric tissue was excised from HA-treated whole animals and allowed to regenerate. At the cellular level the differentiation of head-specific ectodermal epithelial cells was monitored by quantifying monoclonal antibody, CP8, labeling. This labeling has been correlated with a rise in head activation potential and the determination of tissue to form head structures (Javois et al. 1986). At the morphological level tentacle number was monitored. HA-treated regenerates began the head patterning processes and evaginated tentacles sooner than controls but did not produce extra tentacles. The kinetics of CP8 labeling did not reveal major differences between treated and control regenerates after the initiation of head-specific epithelial cell differentiation. HA appeared to act more like a growth factor stimulating the differentiation of head-specific cell types rather than a morphogen which altered head morphology. An additional aspect of the study examined axial-specific effects of HA on the initiation and extent of head-specific epithelial cell differentiation. The cellular response of ectodermal epithelial cells to HA was dependent on their original axial location. More CP8⁺ tissue differentiated in regenerates of apical as opposed to mid-gastric origin.     

Patterning of the head in hydra as visualized by a monoclonal antibody. I. Budding and regeneration

A monoclonal antibody, CP8, has been isolated which displays a position-specific binding pattern to epithelial cells of Hydra oligactis. Antibody binding is restricted to the head of adult animals. When a new head develops during the budding process, CP8 binding is present in the area which will form the head well before morphological signs of it. Similarly, following decapitation as a new head regenerates, CP8 label appears covering a domed area at the apical end of the regenerate before tentacles evaginate delineating the head. When bud development or regeneration is complete, CP8 label is restricted to the new head. Experiments indicate the appearance of CP8 label during the formation of a head correlates closely with the patterning events which result in the determination of the tissue to form a head. The usefulness of CP8 as a diagnostic tool for exploring the dynamics of head pattern formation in hydra is discussed.     

A head signal influences apical migration of interstitial cells in Hydra vulgaris

Although interstitial cells of hydra can migrate either apically or basally along the body column, there is a distinct bias toward apical cell accumulation. This apical bias could be produced by a local vectorial property of the tissue or it may be controlled by a more global property, such as a signal from the apical head region. The migration behavior of BrdU-labeled interstitial cells was examined in several types of grafts to distinguish between these two general types of migration control. Grafting BrdU-labeled midgastric region tissue into a host in either the normal or the reverse orientation had no effect on the apical bias, indicating that a local vectorial cue was probably not guiding cells apically. In grafts with heads or with feet at both ends of the body column, there was no directional bias in migration if the labeled tissue was equidistant from both ends. In the two-headed grafts, if the labeled tissue was closer to one end, there was a bias in the direction of the closer head. The results suggest that a graded signal emanating from the head creates the apical bias and may attract cells via chemotaxis. The apical bias is enhanced in decapitated animals regenerating a head, indicating that the attracting signal is present and is possibly stronger in regenerating heads. The signal for cell migration may be involved in a patterning process underlying head regeneration.     

Interactions between the Foot and the Head Patterning Systems in Hydra vulgaris

The Cnidarian, hydra, is an appealing model system for studying the basic processes underlying pattern formation. Classical studies have elucidated much basic information regarding the role of development gradients, and theoretical models have been quite successful at describing experimental results. However, most experiments and computer simulations have dealt with isolated patterning events such as the dynamics of head regeneration. More global events such as interactions among the head, bud, and foot patterning systems have not been extensively addressed. The characterization of monoclonal antibodies with position-specific labeling patterns and the recent cloning and characterization of genes expressed in position-specific manners now provide the tools for investigating global interactions between patterning systems. In particular, changes in the axial positional value gradient may be monitored in response to experimental perturbation. Rather than studying isolated patterning events, this approach allows us to study patterning over the entire animal. The studies reported here focus on interactions between the foot and the head patterning systems in Hydra vulgaris following induction of a foot in close proximity to a head, axial grafting of a foot closer to the head, or doubling the amount of basal tissue by lateral grafting of an additional peduncle-foot onto host animals. Resulting positional value changes as monitored by antigen (TS19) and gene (ks1 and CnNK-2) expression were assessed in the foot, head, and intervening tissue. The results of the experiments indicate that positional values changed rapidly, in a matter of hours, and that there were reciprocal interactions between the foot and the head patterning systems. Theoretical interpretations of the results in the form of computer simulations based on the reaction-diffusion model are presented and predict many, but not all, of the experimental observations. Since the lateral grafting experiment cannot, at present, be simulated, it is discussed in light of what has been learned from the axial grafting experiments and their simulations.     

Dynamics of decapentaplegic expression during regeneration of the Drosophila melanogaster wing imaginal disc

Regeneration of an imaginal disc involves highly ordered proliferation and pattern regulation of the newly formed tissue. Although the general principles of imaginal disc regeneration have been extensively studied, knowledge of the underlying molecular mechanisms is far from complete. Results from other model organisms suggest that regeneration is the result of local recapitulation of the normal patterning genes. To analyze the dynamics of one major Drosophila patterning gene, decapentaplegic (dpp), in wing imaginal disc regeneration, a vital GFP reporter together with iontophoretic cell labeling were used. Our observations reveal that the restoration of compartment-border-specific dpp expression is a common event in imaginal disc regeneration. However, we did not find evidence of an upregulation of dpp expression during the regeneration process.     

A subset of cells in the nerve net of Hydra oligactis defined by a monoclonal antibody: its arrangement and development

A monoclonal antibody, termed JD1, was generated that bound to a subset of the nerve cells in the hypostome and tentacles of Hydra oligactis. Using a whole-mount technique the spatial pattern of the subset of nerve cells and their processes could be clearly visualized using indirect immunofluorescence. The subset largely corresponds to the epidermal sensory cells. Using the same technique the development of the pattern during head regeneration and budding was examined. The appearance of the nerve cells coincides with the formation of both the tentacles and hypostome. When head regeneration does not occur, JD1+ cells do not appear suggesting the differentiation of JD1+ cells is an integral event in head formation dependent on antecedent patterning processes.     

HyAlx, an aristaless-related gene, is involved in tentacle formation in hydra

Developmental gradients are known to play important roles in axial patterning in hydra. Current efforts are directed toward elucidating the molecular basis of these gradients. We report the isolation and characterization of HyAlx, an aristaless-related gene in hydra. The expression patterns of the gene in adult hydra, as well as during bud formation, head regeneration and the formation of ectopic head structures along the body column, indicate the gene plays a role in the specification of tissue for tentacle formation. The use of RNAi provides more direct evidence for this conclusion. The different patterns of HyAlx expression during head regeneration and bud formation also provide support for a recent version of a reaction-diffusion model for axial patterning in hydra.     

H3K27 demethylases, at long last

Methylation of lysine 27 on histone H3 (H3K27me) by the Polycomb complex (PRC2) proteins is associated with gene silencing in many developmental processes. A cluster of recent papers (Agger et al., 2007; De Santa et al., 2007; Lan et al., 2007; Lee et al., 2007) identify the JmjC-domain proteins UTX and JMJD3 as H3K27-specific demethylases that remove this methyl mark, enabling the activation of genes involved in animal body patterning and the inflammatory response.     

Characterization of the head organizer in hydra

A central process in the maintenance of axial patterning in the adult hydra is the head activation gradient, i.e. the potential to form a secondary axis, which is maximal in the head and is graded down the body column. Earlier evidence suggested that this gradient was based on a single parameter. Using transplantation experiments, we provide evidence that the hypostome, the apical part of the head, has the characteristics of an organizer in that it has the capacity to induce host tissue to form most of the second axis. By contrast, tissue of the body column has a self-organizing capacity, but not an inductive capacity. That the inductive capacity is confined to the hypostome is supported by experiments involving a hypostome-contact graft. The hypostome, but not the body column, transmits a signal(s) leading to the formation of a second axis. In addition, variations of the transplantation grafts and hypostome-contact grafts provide evidence for several characteristics of the organizer. The inductive capacity of the head and the self-organizing capacity of the body column are based on different pathways. Head inhibition, yya signal produced in the head and transmitted to the body column to prevent head formation, represses the effect of the inducing signal by interfering with formation of the hypostome/organizer. These results indicate that the organizer characteristics of the hypostome of an adult hydra are similar to those of the organizer region of vertebrate embryos. They also indicate that the Gierer-Meinhardt model provides a reasonable framework for the mechanisms that underlie the organizer and its activities. In addition, the results suggest that a region of an embryo or adult with the characteristics of an organizer arose early in metazoan evolution.     

Patterning processes in aggregates of Hydra cells visualized with the monoclonal antibody, TS19

The monoclonal antibody, TS19, (Heimfeld et al., 1985), labels the apical surface of ectodermal epithelial cells of tentacles and lower peduncles in Hydra. To investigate the patterning process in a tissue whose original pattern was completely destroyed, the TS19 staining pattern was examined in developing aggregates of Hydra cells. Two types of aggregates were prepared. G-aggregates were made from tissue of the gastric portion of animals and RG-aggregates from gastric tissue allowed to regenerate for 24 hr before making aggregates. G-aggregates were initially TS19-negative, and later dim and uniformly TS19-positive. Thereafter, TS19 staining broke up into brightly stained and unstained regions. The brightly staining regions developed into head or foot structures. The TS19 pattern in RG-aggregates developed differently. Since the initial aggregates contained cells of regenerating tips, they started with TS19-positive cells as well as TS19-negative cells. The numbers of brightly staining TS19-positive cells increased with time. Some patches of these cells developed into head or foot structures, while others did not. These results and a simulation using a reaction-diffusion model suggest that the changes in activation levels affected the temporal changes in the pattern of TS19 staining, and that the de novo pattern formation in hydra can be explained in terms of a process involving activation and inhibition properties.     

Notch-signalling is required for head regeneration and tentacle patterning in Hydra

Local self-activation and long ranging inhibition provide a mechanism for setting up organising regions as signalling centres for the development of structures in the surrounding tissue. The adult hydra hypostome functions as head organiser. After hydra head removal it is newly formed and complete heads can be regenerated. The molecular components of this organising region involve Wnt-signalling and β-catenin. However, it is not known how correct patterning of hypostome and tentacles are achieved in the hydra head and whether other signals in addition to HyWnt3 are needed for re-establishing the new organiser after head removal. Here we show that Notch-signalling is required for re-establishing the organiser during regeneration and that this is due to its role in restricting tentacle activation. Blocking Notch-signalling leads to the formation of irregular head structures characterised by excess tentacle tissue and aberrant expression of genes that mark the tentacle boundaries. This indicates a role for Notch-signalling in defining the tentacle pattern in the hydra head. Moreover, lateral inhibition by HvNotch and its target HyHes are required for head regeneration and without this the formation of the β-catenin/Wnt dependent head organiser is impaired. Work on prebilaterian model organisms has shown that the Wnt-pathway is important for setting up signalling centres for axial patterning in early multicellular animals. Our data suggest that the integration of Wnt-signalling with Notch-Delta activity was also involved in the evolution of defined body plans in animals.     

Nerve cells in hydra: monoclonal antibodies identify two lineages with distinct mechanisms for their incorporation into head tissue

The relationship between populations of nerve cells defined by two monoclonal antibodies was investigated in Hydra oligactis. A population of sensory nerve cells localized in the head (hypostome and tentacles) is identified by the binding of antibody JD1. A second antibody, RC9, binds ganglion cells throughout the animal. When the nerve cell precursors, the interstitial cells, are depleted by treatment with hydroxyurea or nitrogen mustard, the JD1+ nerve cells are lost as epithelial tissue is sloughed at the extremities. In contrast, RC9+ nerve cells remain present in all regions of the animal following treatment with either drug. When such hydra are decapitated to initiate head regeneration, the new head tissue formed is again free of JD1+ sensory cells but does contain RC9+ ganglion cells. Our studies indicate that (1) nerve cells are passively displaced with the epithelial tissue in hydra, (2) JD1+ sensory cells do not arise by the conversion of body column nerve cells that are displaced into the head, whereas RC9+ head nerve cells can originate in the body column, (3) formation of new JD1+ sensory cells requires interstitial cell differentiation. We conclude from these results that the two populations defined by these antibodies are incorporated into the h ad via different developmental pathways and, therefore, constitute distinct nerve cell lineages.     

Co-option of an anteroposterior head axis patterning system for proximodistal patterning of appendages in early bilaterian evolution

The enormous diversity of extant animal forms is a testament to the power of evolution, and much of this diversity has been achieved through the emergence of novel morphological traits. The origin of novel morphological traits is an extremely important issue in biology, and a frequent source of this novelty is co-option of pre-existing genetic systems for new purposes (Carroll et al., 2008). Appendages, such as limbs, fins and antennae, are structures common to many animal body plans which must have arisen at least once, and probably multiple times, in lineages which lacked appendages. We provide evidence that appendage proximodistal patterning genes are expressed in similar registers in the anterior embryonic neurectoderm of Drosophila melanogaster and Saccoglossus kowalevskii (a hemichordate). These results, in concert with existing expression data from a variety of other animals suggest that a pre-existing genetic system for anteroposterior head patterning was co-opted for patterning of the proximodistal axis of appendages of bilaterian animals.     

The head organizer in Hydra

Organizers and organizing centers play critical roles in axis formation and patterning during the early stages of embryogenesis in many bilaterians. The presence and activity of an organizer was first described in adult Hydra about 100 years ago, and in the following decades organizer regions were identified in a number of bilaterian embryos. In an adult Hydra, the cells of the body column are constantly in the mitotic cycle resulting in continuous displacement of the tissue to the extremities where it is sloughed. In this context, the head organizer located in the hypostome is continuously active sending out signals to maintain the structure and morphology of the head, body column and foot of the animal. The molecular basis of the head organizer involves the canonical Wnt pathway, which acts in a self-renewing manner to maintain itself in the context of the tissue dynamics of Hydra. During bud formation, Hydra's mode of asexual reproduction, a head organizer based on the canonical Wnt pathway is set up to initiate and control the development of a new Hydra. As this pathway plays a central role in vertebrate embryonic organizers, its presence and activity in Hydra indicate that the molecular basis of the organizer arose early in metazoan evolution.     

Transplantation phenomena in hydra: Cooperation of position-dependent and structure-dependent factors determines the transplantation result

Hydra transplantation phenomena were examined using lateral grafting (Browne, 1909; Wolpert et al., 1974) and axial grafting (Shostak, 1972, Shostak, 1973, Shostak, 1974; Hicklin et al., 1973) procedures. When a small piece of tissue excised from one hydra is transplanted to another by the former procedure, the transplanted tissue forms a small protrusion on the body column of the host animal, whereas such a protrusion is not produced by the latter procedure. It was found that transplantation experiments carried out by the two procedures gave significantly different results. The frequency of head formation by the transplanted tissue on the host was significantly higher by the lateral than by the axial grafting procedure. This suggests that the small protrusion introduced onto the smooth cylindrical structure of the host body column by the former, but not by the latter, procedure plays an important role in determining the fate of the transplant. It is suggested that the cooperation of two factors determines the transplantation result. One is the positional factor described and discussed by previous workers (e.g., Wolpert et al., 1974; Sugiyama, 1982; MacWilliams, 1983, MacWilliams, 1983; Takano and Sugiyama, 1983) and the other is the structural factor revealed in this study. The underlying mechanisms responsible for the latter factor are discussed.     

Hym-301, a novel peptide, regulates the number of tentacles formed in hydra

Hym-301 is a peptide that was discovered as part of a project aimed at isolating novel peptides from hydra. We have isolated and characterized the gene Hym-301, which encodes this peptide. In an adult, the gene is expressed in the ectoderm of the tentacle zone and hypostome, but not in the tentacles. It is also expressed in the developing head during bud formation and head regeneration. Treatment of regenerating heads with the peptide resulted in an increase in the number of tentacles formed, while treatment with Hym-301 dsRNA resulted in a reduction of tentacles formed as the head developed during bud formation or head regeneration. The expression patterns plus these manipulations indicate the gene has a role in tentacle formation. Furthermore, treatment of epithelial animals indicates the gene directly affects the epithelial cells that form the tentacles. Raising the head activation gradient, a morphogenetic gradient that controls axial patterning in hydra, throughout the body column results in extending the range of Hym-301 expression down the body column. This indicates the range of expression of the gene appears to be controlled by this gradient. Thus, Hym-301 is involved in axial patterning in hydra, and specifically in the regulation of the number of tentacles formed.     

The head inducer Cerberus in a multivalent extracellular inhibitor

Cerberus encodes for a secreted protein which when overexpressed ventrally in a Xenopus embryo induces head differentiation without trunk (Bouwmeester et al., 1996). We have recently shown that Cerberus can bind BMP-4 (Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4), Xnr-1 (Xenopus Nodal-related 1) and Xwnt-8 in the extracellular space (Piccolo et al., 1999). We present here studies showing that Cerberus does not have a receptor nor a dedicated transduction pathway but rather acts as an extracellular inhibitor. Our results suggest that the action of Cerberus in head induction can be explained by an inhibitory activity upstream of the Nodal-related and BMP-4 receptors. In addition, using dominant negative receptor mutants which block both the Xnr-1 and BMP-4 transduction pathways, we show that this double inhibition is sufficient for head induction in ventral mesoderm explants.     

Failure of differentiation of the nuclear-perinuclear skeletal complex in the round-headed human spermatozoa

Acrosomeless round-headed spermatozoa from three men were studied under electron microscopy and indirect immunofluorescene microscopy using the anti-calicin antibody that recognizes a basic protein of the sperm perinuclear theca (Longo et al., 1987). Electron microscopy revealed the existence of anomalies of the nuclear envelope, the nuclear matrix underlying the nuclear envelope, and the perinuclear layer. The absence of sperm labeling with the anti-calicin antibody confirmed that the formation of the perinuclear theca was impaired. Data obtained from both mature spermatozoa and ejaculated spermatids suggest that i) round-headed sperm head anomalies result from a failure of differentiation of the sperm-specific skeletal complex related to the nucleus, and ii) the acrosome spreading over the nucleus, the nuclear elongation and the post-acrosomal sheath formation are dependent on such nuclear-perinuclear differentiations. In contrast, chromatin condensation, cytokinesis and some events of the acrosomal shaping appear not to depend on those nuclear-related differentiations. The possible processes allowing the maintenance of the sperm head structures and their subsequent morphogenesis are discussed.