Protein disulfide isomerase serves as a molecular chaperone to maintain estrogen receptor alpha structure and function

The effects of the steroid hormone 17beta-estradiol are mediated through its interaction with the nuclear estrogen receptor (ER). Upon binding 17beta-estradiol, the ER initiates changes in gene expression through its interaction with specific DNA sequences, estrogen response elements (EREs), and recruits coregulatory proteins that influence gene expression. To better understand how estrogen-responsive genes are regulated, we have isolated and identified proteins associated with ERalpha when it is bound to the consensus ERE. One of these proteins, protein disulfide isomerase (PDI), has two distinct functions: acting as a molecular chaperone to maintain properly folded proteins and regulating the redox state of proteins by catalyzing the thiol-disulfide exchange reaction through two thioredoxin-like domains. Using a battery of biochemical and molecular techniques, we have demonstrated that PDI colocalizes with ERalpha in MCF-7 nuclei, alters ERalpha conformation, enhances the ERalpha-ERE interaction in the absence and presence of an oxidizing agent, influences the ability of ERalpha to mediate changes in gene expression, and associates with promoter regions of two endogenous estrogen-responsive genes. Our studies suggest that PDI plays a critical role in estrogen responsiveness by functioning as a molecular chaperone and assisting the receptor in differentially regulating target gene expression.     

Recruitment of DNA repair synthesis machinery to sites of DNA damage/repair in living human cells

The eukaryotic sliding DNA clamp, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), is essential for DNA replication and repair synthesis. In order to load the ring-shaped, homotrimeric PCNA onto the DNA double helix, the ATPase activity of the replication factor C (RFC) clamp loader complex is required. Although the recruitment of PCNA by RFC to DNA replication sites has well been documented, our understanding of its recruitment during DNA repair synthesis is limited. In this study, we analyzed the accumulation of endogenous and fluorescent-tagged proteins for DNA repair synthesis at the sites of DNA damage produced locally by UVA-laser micro-irradiation in HeLa cells. Accumulation kinetics and in vitro pull-down assays of the large subunit of RFC (RFC140) revealed that there are two distinct modes of recruitment of RFC to DNA damage, a simultaneous accumulation of RFC140 and PCNA caused by interaction between PCNA and the extreme N-terminus of RFC140 and a much faster accumulation of RFC140 than PCNA at the damaged site. Furthermore, RFC140 knock-down experiments showed that PCNA can accumulate at DNA damage independently of RFC. These results suggest that immediate accumulation of RFC and PCNA at DNA damage is only partly interdependent.     

Unloading of homologous recombination factors is required for restoring double‐stranded DNA at damage repair loci

Cells use homology‐dependent DNA repair to mend chromosome breaks and restore broken replication forks, thereby ensuring genome stability and cell survival. DNA break repair via homology‐based mechanisms involves nuclease‐dependent DNA end resection, which generates long tracts of single‐stranded DNA required for checkpoint activation and loading of homologous recombination proteins Rad52/51/55/57. While recruitment of the homologous recombination machinery is well characterized, it is not known how its presence at repair loci is coordinated with downstream re‐synthesis of resected DNA. We show that Rad51 inhibits recruitment of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), the platform for assembly of the DNA replication machinery, and that unloading of Rad51 by Srs2 helicase is required for efficient PCNA loading and restoration of resected DNA. As a result, srs2Δ mutants are deficient in DNA repair correlating with extensive DNA processing, but this defect in srs2Δ mutants can be suppressed by inactivation of the resection nuclease Exo1. We propose a model in which during re‐synthesis of resected DNA, the replication machinery must catch up with the preceding processing nucleases, in order to close the single‐stranded gap and terminate further resection.