The rise and fall of NMDA antagonists for ischemic stroke

It has long been accepted that high concentrations of glutamate can destroy neurons, and this is the basis of the theory of excitotoxicity during brain injury such as stroke. Glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists such as Selfotel, Aptiganel, Gavestinel and others failed to show neuroprotective efficacy in human clinical trials or produced intolerable central nervous system adverse effects. The failure of these agents has been attributed to poor studies in animal models and to poorly designed clinical trials. We also speculate that NMDA receptor antagonism may have hindered endogenous mechanisms for neuronal survival and neuroregeneration. It remains to be proven in human stroke whether NMDA receptor antagonism can be neuroprotective.     

Mesenchymal stem cells: therapeutic outlook for stroke

Adult bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) display a spectrum of functional properties. Transplantation of these cells improves clinical outcome in models of cerebral ischemia and spinal cord injury via mechanisms that may include replacement of damaged cells, neuroprotective effects, induction of axonal sprouting, and neovascularization. Therapeutic effects have been reported in animal models of stroke after intravenous delivery of MSCs, including those derived from adult human bone marrow. Initial clinical studies on intravenously delivered MSCs have now been completed in human subjects with stroke. Here, we review the reparative and protective properties of transplanted MSCs in stroke models, describe initial human studies on intravenous MSC delivery in stroke, and provide a perspective on prospects for future progress with MSCs.     

Estradiol protects against ischemic brain injury in middle-aged rats

Several clinical studies suggest that estradiol acts as a potent growth and protective factor in the adult brain. Postmenopausal women experience permanent hypoestrogenicity and suffer from increased risk of brain injury associated with neurodegenerative diseases such as stroke and Alzheimer's disease. Estrogen replacement therapy appears to decrease the risk and severity of these neurodegenerative conditions. Studies using animal models have shown that estradiol exerts similar effects in rodents and can enhance cell survival and induce synaptic plasticity. Therefore, we undertook studies to assess whether estradiol treatment can decrease brain injury and cell death induced by an experimental model of ischemia and whether aging animals remain responsive to the protective effects of estradiol. We will review results from recent studies that demonstrate that 1) in young animals, estrogens exert profound protective effects against ischemic brain injury induced by cerebral artery occlusion and 2) the response of aging animals has been tested with varying results. We will discuss and compare our experimental findings that utilize a permanent cerebral artery occlusion model and physiological levels of estradiol replacement therapy in young and middle-aged rats with those of previous studies. These observations provide important insights into the potential protective actions of estrogen replacement therapy on age- and disease-related processes in the brain.     

Hematopoietic cytokines--on the verge of conquering neurology

Two hematopoietic cytokines are currently gaining increasing attention within neurological research. Erythropoietin (EPO) and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) have long been known for their ability to induce the proliferation of certain populations of hematopoietic lineage cells. However, it has recently been found that EPO, G-CSF, and their respective receptors are also expressed in the human central nervous system (CNS) and may be an important part of the brain's endogenous system of protection. Both hematopoietic cytokines have been shown to have neuroprotective potential in a variety of animal disease models both in vitro and in vivo, through the inhibition of apoptosis, induction of angiogenesis, exertion of anti-inflammatory and neurotrophic effects, as well as by the enhancement of neurogenesis. EPO and G-CSF have been extensively studied in the context of hematological disorders and have recently been successfully applied in the first clinical trials in stroke patients. Intravenous high-dose EPO therapy was associated with an improvement in the clinical outcome and preclinical studies with intravenous high-dose G-CSF therapy have clearly shown that it has considerable neuroprotective potential in the acute, as well as in the chronic phase of stroke. In this review, the current knowledge of the neuroprotective mechanisms of EPO and G-CSF is summarized with regard to in vitro and in vivo data. Focus is placed on the role of EPO in neurological disease models with an emphasis on its influence on functional outcome. New experimental results are assessed in detail and correlated with the findings of recent clinical studies.     

Stroke pathophysiology: management challenges and new treatment advances

Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the first cause of lost disability-adjusted years in developed countries. During the past decade, new developments in thrombolytic therapy have led to the implementation of emergency intervention protocols for the treatment of ischemic stroke, replacing the widespread sense of therapeutic nihilism in the past. Treatment with rtPA has shown to be effective within the first 3 hours following stroke onset and the FDA and the European Medical Agency (EMEA) have approved its use. Acknowledging the urgency and intricacies of stroke, Stroke Units allow the monitoring of physiological parameters in the acute phase of stroke and are considered an important management tool that can significantly improve the quality of care provided to the patient. The concept of neuroprotective therapy for acute ischemic stroke to salvage tissue at risk and improve functional outcome is based on sound scientific principles and extensive preclinical animal studies demonstrating efficacy. However, most neuroprotective drugs in clinical trials have failed, possibly due to inadequate preclinical testing or flawed clinical development programs. Several new treatment strategies are under development and are being tested. This review is directed at understanding the management of acute ischemic stroke pathophysiology. We address the management challenges and new treatment advances by integrating the knowledge of possible pharmacological targets for acute ischemic stroke. We hope to shed new light upon the controversy surrounding the management of acute ischemic stroke in an attempt to elucidate why failed clinical trials continue to occur despite promising neuroprotective preclinical studies.     

Cross-Sectional Analysis of Data from the U.S. Clinical Trials Database Reveals Poor Translational Clinical Trial Effort for Traumatic Brain Injury,Compared with Stroke

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an important public health problem, comparable to stroke in incidence and prevalence. Few interventions have proven efficacy in TBI, and clinical trials are, therefore, necessary to advance management in TBI. We describe the current clinical trial landscape in traumatic brain injury and compare it with the trial efforts for stroke. For this, we analysed all stroke and TBI studies registered on the US Clinical Trials (www.clinicaltrials.gov) database over a 10-year period (01/01/2000 to 01/31/2013). This methodology has been previously used to analyse clinical trial efforts in other specialties. We describe the research profile in each area: total number of studies, total number of participants and change in number of research studies over time. We also analysed key study characteristics, such as enrolment number and scope of recruitment. We found a mismatch between relative public health burden and relative research effort in each disease. Despite TBI having comparable prevalence and higher incidence than stroke, it has around one fifth of the number of clinical trials and participant recruitment. Both stroke and TBI have experienced an increase in the number of studies over the examined time period, but the rate of growth for TBI is one third that for stroke. Small-scale (<1000 participants per trial) and single centre studies form the majority of clinical trials in both stroke and TBI, with TBI having significantly fewer studies with international recruitment. We discuss the consequences of these findings and how the situation might be improved. A sustained research effort, entailing increased international collaboration and rethinking the methodology of running clinical trials, is required in order to improve outcomes after traumatic brain injury.     

Role of estrogen receptor-alpha in pharmacogenetics of estrogen action

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize recent data regarding the role of estrogen receptor-alpha polymorphisms in determining the response to estrogen therapy or the risk of clinical cardiovascular events. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent clinical trials of hormone replacement therapy for cardiovascular disease have yielded surprisingly negative results, shifting clinical opinions from a position of presumed cardiovascular benefit to one of confirmed harm. Understanding why hormone replacement therapy has beneficial effects on intermediate risk markers for cardiovascular disease, but produces an increase in cardiovascular events, is an important public health question with the potential to elucidate fundamentally important aspects on atherogenesis, cardiovascular disease, and the biology of estrogen action. One question concerning the cardiovascular effects of hormone replacement therapy is whether genetic factors can substantially modify individual responses to estrogen treatment. New clinical trial evidence is emerging that links the presence of particular variants in the estrogen receptor to the response of HDL and other intermediate endpoints to hormone replacement therapy. SUMMARY: One or more common variants in estrogen receptor-alpha are associated with a differential response to hormone replacement therapy in several domains of estrogen action. However, the effect of these variants on the risk of clinical cardiovascular events in the setting of hormone replacement therapy is not yet known. Additional research focusing on the clinical impact of common variants in estrogen receptor-alpha, estrogen receptor-beta and the progesterone receptor promise to improve clinical decision-making concerning the use of hormone replacement therapy and other novel estrogen agonists.     

Remote Neurodegeneration: Multiple Actors for One Play

Remote neurodegeneration significantly influences the clinical outcome in many central nervous system (CNS) pathologies, such as stroke, multiple sclerosis, and traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries. Because these processes develop days or months after injury, they are accompanied by a therapeutic window of opportunity. The complexity and clinical significance of remote damage is prompting many groups to examine the factors of remote degeneration. This research is providing insights into key unanswered questions, opening new avenues for innovative neuroprotective therapies. In this review, we evaluate data from various remote degeneration models to describe the complexity of the systems that are involved and the importance of their interactions in reducing damage and promoting recovery after brain lesions. Specifically, we recapitulate the current data on remote neuronal degeneration, focusing on molecular and cellular events, as studied in stroke and brain and spinal cord injury models. Remote damage is a multifactorial phenomenon in which many components become active in specific time frames. Days, weeks, or months after injury onset, the interplay between key effectors differentially affects neuronal survival and functional outcomes. In particular, we discuss apoptosis, inflammation, oxidative damage, and autophagy—all of which mediate remote degeneration at specific times. We also review current findings on the pharmacological manipulation of remote degeneration mechanisms in reducing damage and sustaining outcomes. These novel treatments differ from those that have been proposed to limit primary lesion site damage, representing new perspectives on neuroprotection.     

Stroke. Revolution in therapy.

Stroke remains the third leading cause of death in this country, although recent advances in both clinical and basic science research have revolutionized the concept of stroke. Studies of primary and secondary stroke prevention have now documented the means to prevent thousands of cases of stroke each year. Three distinct strategies are evolving for intervention in the acute stroke process. Evidence is clear that ischemia leads to a toxic accumulation of intracellular calcium, in part mediated by excitatory neurotransmitters such as glutamate. Glutamate antagonists have shown clear benefit in experimental stroke models, and early clinical trials are underway. Acute revascularization to restore perfusion is also feasible and may minimize the extent of infarction. Studies of fibrinolytic agents are promising, with randomized clinical studies being done. While reperfusion is desired, it may be associated with additional neuronal injury. The development of anaerobic metabolism followed by reperfusion and aerobic conditions favors oxidation and free-radical formation. This mechanism of injury can be decreased by agents known to scavenge free radicals, and clinical trials are also testing this. This revolution in the understanding of ischemia, as well as the outpouring of new pharmacologic agents, is making stroke a true neurologic emergency requiring immediate intervention.     

Serum S100B is a useful surrogate marker for long-term outcomes in photochemically-induced thrombotic stroke rat models

In recent years, serum S100B has been used as a secondary endpoint in some clinical trials, in which serum S100B has successfully indicated the benefits or harm done by the tested agents. Compared to clinical stroke studies, few experimental stroke studies report using serum S100B as a surrogate marker for estimating the long-term effects of neuroprotectants. This study sought to observe serum S100B kinetics in PIT stroke models and to clarify the association between serum S100B and both final infarct volumes and long-term neurological outcomes. Furthermore, to demonstrate that early elevations in serum S100B reflect successful neuroprotective treatment, a pharmacological study was performed with a non-competitive NMDA glutamate receptor antagonist, MK-801. Serum S100B levels were significantly elevated after PIT stroke, reaching peak values 48 h after the onset and declining thereafter. Single measurements of serum S100B as early as 48 h after PIT stroke correlated significantly with final infarct volumes and long-term neurological outcomes. Elevated serum S100B was significantly attenuated by MK-801, correlating significantly with long-term beneficial effects of MK-801 on infarct volumes and neurological outcomes. Our results showed that single measurements of serum S100B 48 h after PIT stroke would serve as an early and simple surrogate marker for long-term evaluation of histological and neurological outcomes in PIT stroke rat models.     

Stem cell therapy in stroke: designing clinical trials

Stroke is a common and disabling condition that represents a potentially attractive target for regenerative therapy. Stem cells from a wide range of origins have been investigated in studies using animal models of stroke, with evidence that neural or mesenchymal cells migrate to the site of ischemic injury after intravascular or intraparenchymal delivery, and that a proportion of cells survive and differentiate into cells with characteristics of neurons or glia. In some studies there is evidence of electrical function of transplanted cells. Some studies report improvements in neurological function with cell implantation even when undertaken up to 30 days after the stroke is induced. Few clinical trials have been undertaken to date, with two studies of a teratocarcinoma-derived cell line delivered by direct brain injection, and two of bone-marrow derived mesenchymal stem cells delivered intravascularly. Ongoing trials of other cell lines are exploring safety. There are considerable difficulties in designing future efficacy trials, some being generic to the field of regenerative treatment in stroke, and some that are specific to stem cells or their mode of delivery.     

Stem and progenitor cells for neurological repair: minor issues, major hurdles, and exciting opportunities for paracrine-based therapeutics

The transplantation of cultured stem and progenitor cells is a key element in the rapidly growing field of regenerative medicine. Based on their ability to rescue and/or repair injured tissue and partially restore organ function, multiple types of stem/progenitor cells have already entered into clinical trials. However, despite several decades of intense research, the goal to apply culture-expanded stem/progenitor cells in a manner that can effectively replace cells after injury has yet to be realized. Many sources of potentially useful cells are available, but something is clearly missing. In addition, recent studies suggest that paracrine effects of secreted or released factors are responsible for most of the benefits observed after cell transplantation, rather than direct cell replacement. These data call into question the need for cell transplantation for many types of therapy, in particular for acute injuries such as myocardial infarction and stroke. In this review, we examine current progress in the area of cell transplantation and minor issues and major hurdles regarding the clinical application of different cell types. We discuss the "paracrine hypothesis" for the action of transplanted stem/progenitor cells as an opportunity to identify defined combinations of biomolecules to rescue and/or repair tissues after injury. Although many of the concepts in this review will apply to multiple injury/repair systems, we will focus primarily on stem/progenitor cell-based treatments for neurological disorders and stroke.     

The role of the complement cascade in ischemia/reperfusion injury: implications for neuroprotection

BACKGROUND: The complement cascade plays a deleterious role in multiple models of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, including stroke. Investigation of the complement cascade may provide a critical approach to identifying neuroprotective strategies that can be effective at clinically relevant time points in cerebral ischemia. This review of the literature describes the deleterious effects of complement activation in systemic I/R models and previous attempts at therapeutic complement inhibition, with a focus on the potential role of complement inhibition in ischemic neuroprotection. Translation of these concepts into ischemic stroke models and exploration of related neuroprotective strategies are also reviewed. SUMMARY OF REVIEW: We performed a MEDLINE search to identify any studies published between 1966 and 2001 dealing with complement activation in the setting of I/R injury. We also searched for studies demonstrating up-regulation of any complement components within the central nervous system during inflammation and/or ischemia. CONCLUSIONS: The temporal and mechanistic overlap of the complement cascade with other biochemical events occurring in cerebral I/R injury is quite complex and is only beginning to be understood. However, there is compelling evidence that complement is quite active in the setting of acute stroke, suggesting that anticomplement strategies should be further investigated through genetic analysis, nonhuman primate models, and clinical investigations.     

WJSC 6th Anniversary Special Issues（2）:Mesenchymal stem cells Neurotrauma and mesenchymal stem cells treatment:From experimental studies to clinical trials

Mesenchymal stem cell(MSC)therapy has attracted the attention of scientists and clinicians around the world.Basic and pre-clinical experimental studies have highlighted the positive effects of MSC treatment after spinal cord and peripheral nerve injury.These effects are believed to be due to their ability to differentiate into other cell lineages,modulate inflammatory and immunomodulatory responses,reduce cell apoptosis,secrete several neurotrophic factors and respond to tissue injury,among others.There are many pre-clinical studies on MSC treatment for spinal cord injury(SCI)and peripheral nerve injuries.However,the same is not true for clinical trials,particularly those concerned with nerve trauma,indicating the necessity of more well-constructed studies showing the benefits that cell therapy can provide for individuals suffering the consequences of nerve lesions.As for clinical trials for SCI treatment the results obtained so far are not as beneficial as those described in experimental studies.For these reasons basic and pre-clinical studies dealing with MSC therapy should emphasize the standardization of protocols that could be translated to the clinical set with consistent and positive outcomes.This review is based on pre-clinical studies and clinical trials available in the literature from 2010 until now.At the time of writing this article there were 43 and 36 pre-clinical and 19 and 1 clinical trials on injured spinal cord and peripheral nerves,respectively.     

Interactions between age,sex, and hormones in experimental ischemic stroke

Age, sex, and gonadal hormones have profound effects on ischemic stroke outcomes, although how these factors impact basic stroke pathophysiology remains unclear. There is a plethora of inconsistent data reported throughout the literature, primarily due to differences in the species examined, the timing and methods used to evaluate injury, the models used, and confusion regarding differences in stroke incidence as seen in clinical populations vs. effects on acute neuroprotection or neurorepair in experimental stroke models. Sex and gonadal hormone exposure have considerable independent impact on stroke outcome, but these factors also interact with each other, and the contribution of each differs throughout the lifespan. The contribution of sex and hormones to experimental stroke will be the focus of this review. Recent advances and our current understanding of age, sex, and hormone interactions in ischemic stroke with a focus on inflammation will be discussed.     

Valproic Acid: A New Candidate of Therapeutic Application for the Acute Central Nervous System Injuries

Acute central nervous system (CNS) injuries, including stroke, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and spinal cord injury (SCI), are common causes of human disabilities and deaths, but the pathophysiology of these diseases is not fully elucidated and, thus, effective pharmacotherapies are still lacking. Valproic acid (VPA), an inhibitor of histone deacetylation, is mainly used to treat epilepsy and bipolar disorder with few complications. Recently, the neuroprotective effects of VPA have been demonstrated in several models of acute CNS injuries, such as stroke, TBI, and SCI. VPA protects the brain from injury progression via anti-inflammatory, anti-apoptotic, and neurotrophic effects. In this review, we focus on the emerging neuroprotective properties of VPA and explore the underlying mechanisms. In particular, we discuss several potential related factors in VPA research and present the opportunity to administer VPA as a novel neuropective agent.     

Evidence to Consider Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers for the Treatment of Early Alzheimer’s Disease

Alzheimer’s disease is the most frequent type of dementia and diagnosed late in the progression of the illness when irreversible brain tissue loss has already occurred. For this reason, treatments have been ineffective. It is imperative to find novel therapies ameliorating modifiable risk factors (hypertension, stroke, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, and traumatic brain injury) and effective against early pathogenic mechanisms including alterations in cerebral blood flow leading to poor oxygenation and decreased access to nutrients, impaired glucose metabolism, chronic inflammation, and glutamate excitotoxicity. Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) fulfill these requirements. ARBs are directly neuroprotective against early injury factors in neuronal, astrocyte, microglia, and cerebrovascular endothelial cell cultures. ARBs protect cerebral blood flow and reduce injury to the blood brain barrier and neurological and cognitive loss in animal models of brain ischemia, traumatic brain injury, and Alzheimer’s disease. These compounds are clinically effective against major risk factors for Alzheimer’s disease: hypertension, stroke, chronic kidney disease, diabetes and metabolic syndrome, and ameliorate age-dependent cognitive loss. Controlled studies on hypertensive patients, open trials, case reports, and database meta-analysis indicate significant therapeutic effects of ARBs in Alzheimer’s disease. ARBs are safe compounds, widely used to treat cardiovascular and metabolic disorders in humans, and although they reduce hypertension, they do not affect blood pressure in normotensive individuals. Overall, there is sufficient evidence to consider long-term controlled clinical studies with ARBs in patients suffering from established risk factors, in patients with early cognitive loss, or in normal individuals when reliable biomarkers of Alzheimer’s disease risk are identified.     

Combination antifungal therapy: From bench to bedside

Invasive fungal infections are major causes of mortality in immunocompromised patients. Despite improved outcomes with new antifungals, there remains a pressing need to further improve outcomes, especially with invasive aspergillosis and other invasive mold infections. Combination antifungal therapy is an attractive option that offers the prospect for improved efficacy, decreased toxicity, reduced likelihood for the emergence of resistance, and shorter courses of therapy. The current available evidence regarding the role of combination antifungal therapy for invasive fungal infections is discussed in this article, including data from in vitro studies, animal models, and human clinical trials to try to clarify this important issue. Randomized, prospective clinical trials are urgently needed, especially for invasive aspergillosis.     

Pathophysiology of stroke and stroke-induced retinal ischemia: emerging role of stem cells

The current review focuses on pathophysiology, animal models and molecular analysis of stroke and retinal ischemia, and the role of stem cells in recovery of these disease conditions. Research findings associated with ischemic stroke and retinal ischemia have been discussed, and efforts towards prevention and limiting the recurrence of ischemic diseases, as well as emerging treatment possibilities with endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) in ischemic diseases, are presented. Although most neurological diseases are still not completely understood and reliable treatment is lacking, animal models provide a major step in validating novel therapies. Stem cell approaches constitute an emerging form of cell-based therapy to treat ischemic diseases since it is an attractive source for regenerative therapy in the ischemic diseases. In this review, we highlight the advantages and limitations of this approach with a focus on key observations from preclinical animal studies and clinical trials. Further research, especially on treatment with EPCs is warranted.