APH1 Polar Transmembrane Residues Regulate the Assembly and Activity of Presenilin Complexes

Complexes involved in the γ/ϵ-secretase-regulated intramembranous proteolysis of substrates such as the amyloid-β precursor protein are composed primarily of presenilin (PS1 or PS2), nicastrin, anterior pharynx defective-1 (APH1), and PEN2. The presenilin aspartyl residues form the catalytic site, and similar potentially functional polar transmembrane residues in APH1 have been identified. Substitution of charged (E84A, R87A) or polar (Q83A) residues in TM3 had no effect on complex assembly or activity. In contrast, changes to either of two highly conserved histidines (H171A, H197A) located in TM5 and TM6 negatively affected PS1 cleavage and altered binding to other secretase components, resulting in decreased amyloid generating activity. Charge replacement with His-to-Lys substitutions rescued nicastrin maturation and PS1 endoproteolysis leading to assembly of the formation of structurally normal but proteolytically inactive γ-secretase complexes. Substitution with a negatively charged side chain (His-to-Asp) or altering the structural location of the histidines also disrupted γ-secretase binding and abolished functionality of APH1. These results suggest that the conserved transmembrane histidine residues contribute to APH1 function and can affect presenilin catalytic activity.The anterior pharynx defective-1 (APH1)⁵ protein is an essential component of presenilin-dependent complexes required for the γ/ϵ-secretase activity (1). The multicomponent γ-secretase is responsible for the intramembrane proteolysis of a variety of substrates including the amyloid-β precursor protein (APP) and Notch receptor. Notch signaling is involved in a variety of important cell fate decisions during embryogenesis and adulthood (2). The γ/ϵ-secretase cleavage of APP protein is related to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease by releasing the 4-kDa amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) which accumulates as senile plaques in patients with Alzheimer disease (3, 4).The γ-complexes are composed of multispanning transmembrane proteins that include APH1 (5, 6), presenilin (PS1 or PS2) (7–10), PEN2 (5), and the type 1 transmembrane nicastrin (NCT) (11). All four components are essential for proteolytic activity, and loss of any single component destabilizes the complex, resulting in the loss of substrate cleavage. Conversely, co-expression of all four components increases γ-secretase activity (12–14). During the maturation of the complexes, presenilins undergo an endoproteolytic cleavage to generate amino- and carboxyl-terminal fragments which remain associated as heterodimers in the active high molecular weight complexes (15–18). Although the exact function of presenilins has been debated (19, 20), it has been proposed that the presenilins are aspartyl proteases with two transmembrane residues constituting the catalytic subunit (21). Analogous aspartyl catalytic dyads are found in the signal peptide peptidases (21, 22). Contributions from the other components are under investigation, and it has been shown, for example, that the large ectodomain of NCT plays a key role in substrate recognition (23, 24). It has also been shown that other proteins can regulate activity such as TMP21, a member of p24 cargo protein, which binds to the presenilin complexes and selectively modulates γ but not ϵ cleavage (25, 26).APH1 is a seven-transmembrane protein with a topology such that the amino terminus is oriented with the endoplasmic reticulum and the carboxyl terminus resides in the cytoplasm (6, 27). It is also expressed as different isoforms encoded by two genes in humans (APH1a on chromosome 1; APH1b on chromosome 15) or three genes in rodents (APH1a on chromosome 3; APH1b and APH1c on chromosome 9). APH1a has 55% sequence similarity with APH1b/APH1c, whereas APH1b and APH1c share 95% similarity. In addition to these different genes, APH1a is alternatively spliced to generate a short (APH1aS) and a long isoform (APH1aL). These two isoforms differ by the addition of 18 residues on the carboxyl-terminal part of APH1aL (28, 29). Deletion of APH1a in mice is embryonically lethal and is associated with developmental and patterning defects similar to those found in Notch, NCT, or PS1 null embryos (30, 31). In contrast to the essential nature of APH1a, the combined APH1b/c-deficient mice survive into adulthood (31). This suggests that APH1a is the major homologue involved in presenilin-dependent function during embryonic development. In addition, these different APH1 variants are constituents of distinct, proteolytically active presenilin-containing complexes and may, therefore, make unique contributions to γ-secretase activity (30–32).Despite their importance to complex formation and function, the exact role of the APH1 isoforms in presenilin-dependent γ/ϵ-secretase activity remains under investigation. In the current study, several highly conserved polar and charged residues located within the transmembrane domains of APH1 were identified. Mutagenesis of two conserved histidine residues embedded in TM5 and TM6 (His-171 and His-197) lead to alterations in γ-secretase complex maturation and activity. The histidine residues contribute to APH1 function and are involved in stabilizing interactions with other γ-secretase components. These key histidines may also be physically localized near the presenilin active site and involved in the γ-secretase activity as shown by the decreased activity of γ-secretase complexes that are assembled with the His-mutants.     

Proinsulin and the Genetics of Diabetes Mellitus

Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.Insulin plays a central role in the regulation of vertebrate metabolism. The hormone, the post-translational product of a single-chain precursor, is a globular protein containing two chains, A (21 residues) and B (30 residues). Recent advances in human genetics have identified dominant mutations in the insulin gene causing permanent neonatal-onset DM² (1–4). The mutations are predicted to block folding of the precursor in the ER of pancreatic β-cells. Although expression of the wild-type allele would in other circumstances be sufficient to maintain homeostasis, studies of a corresponding mouse model (5–7) suggest that the misfolded variant perturbs wild-type biosynthesis (8, 9). Impaired β-cell secretion is associated with ER stress, distorted organelle architecture, and cell death (10). These findings have renewed interest in insulin biosynthesis (11–13) and the structural basis of disulfide pairing (14–19). Protein evolution is constrained not only by structure and function but also by susceptibility to toxic misfolding.     

PTIP Regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA Damage Sites

Although PTIP is implicated in the DNA damage response, through interactions with 53BP1, the function of PTIP in the DNA damage response remain elusive. Here, we show that RNF8 controls DNA damage-induced nuclear foci formation of PTIP, which in turn regulates 53BP1 localization to the DNA damage sites. In addition, SMC1, a substrate of ATM, could not be phosphorylated at the DNA damage sites in the absence of PTIP. The PTIP-dependent pathway is important for DNA double strand breaks repair and DNA damage-induced intra-S phase checkpoint activation. Taken together, these results suggest that the role of PTIP in the DNA damage response is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1. Thus, PTIP regulates 53BP1-dependent signaling pathway following DNA damage.The DNA damage response pathways are signal transduction pathways with DNA damage sensors, mediators, and effectors, which are essential for maintaining genomic stability (1–3). Following DNA double strand breaks, histone H2AX at the DNA damage sites is rapidly phosphorylated by ATM/ATR/DNAPK (4–10), a family homologous to phosphoinositide 3-kinases (11, 12). Subsequently, phospho-H2AX (γH2AX) provides the platform for accumulation of a larger group of DNA damage response factors, such as MDC1, BRCA1, 53BP1, and the MRE11·RAD50·NBS1 complex (13, 14), at the DNA damage sites. Translocalization of these proteins to the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)³ facilitates DNA damage checkpoint activation and enhances the efficiency of DNA damage repair (14, 15).Recently, PTIP (Pax2 transactivation domain-interacting protein, or Paxip) has been identified as a DNA damage response protein and is required for cell survival when exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) (1, 16–18). PTIP is a 1069-amino acid nuclear protein and has been originally identified in a yeast two-hybrid screening as a partner of Pax2 (19). Genetic deletion of the PTIP gene in mice leads to early embryonic lethality at embryonic day 8.5, suggesting that PTIP is essential for early embryonic development (20). Structurally, PTIP contains six tandem BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) domains (16–18, 21). The BRCT domain is a phospho-group binding domain that mediates protein-protein interactions (17, 22, 23). Interestingly, the BRCT domain has been found in a large number of proteins involved in the cellular response to DNA damages, such as BRCA1, MDC1, and 53BP1 (7, 24–29). Like other BRCT domain-containing proteins, upon exposure to IR, PTIP forms nuclear foci at the DSBs, which is dependent on its BRCT domains (16–18). By protein affinity purification, PTIP has been found in two large complexes. One includes the histone H3K4 methyltransferase ALR and its associated cofactors, the other contains DNA damage response proteins, including 53BP1 and SMC1 (30, 31). Further experiments have revealed that DNA damage enhances the interaction between PTIP and 53BP1 (18, 31).To elucidate the DNA damage response pathways, we have examined the upstream and downstream partners of PTIP. Here, we report that PTIP is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1 in response to DNA damage. Moreover, PTIP and 53BP1 are required for the phospho-ATM association with the chromatin, which phosphorylates SMC1 at the DSBs. This PTIP-dependent pathway is involved in DSBs repair.     

Role of Partitioning-defective 1/Microtubule Affinity-regulating Kinases in the Morphogenetic Activity of Helicobacter pylori CagA

Helicobacter pylori CagA plays a key role in gastric carcinogenesis. Upon delivery into gastric epithelial cells, CagA binds and deregulates SHP-2 phosphatase, a bona fide oncoprotein, thereby causing sustained ERK activation and impaired focal adhesions. CagA also binds and inhibits PAR1b/MARK2, one of the four members of the PAR1 family of kinases, to elicit epithelial polarity defect. In nonpolarized gastric epithelial cells, CagA induces the hummingbird phenotype, an extremely elongated cell shape characterized by a rear retraction defect. This morphological change is dependent on CagA-deregulated SHP-2 and is thus thought to reflect the oncogenic potential of CagA. In this study, we investigated the role of the PAR1 family of kinases in the hummingbird phenotype. We found that CagA binds not only PAR1b but also other PAR1 isoforms, with order of strength as follows: PAR1b > PAR1d ≥ PAR1a > PAR1c. Binding of CagA with PAR1 isoforms inhibits the kinase activity. This abolishes the ability of PAR1 to destabilize microtubules and thereby promotes disassembly of focal adhesions, which contributes to the hummingbird phenotype. Consistently, PAR1 knockdown potentiates induction of the hummingbird phenotype by CagA. The morphogenetic activity of CagA was also found to be augmented through inhibition of non-muscle myosin II. Because myosin II is functionally associated with PAR1, perturbation of PAR1-regulated myosin II by CagA may underlie the defect of rear retraction in the hummingbird phenotype. Our findings reveal that CagA systemically inhibits PAR1 family kinases and indicate that malfunctioning of microtubules and myosin II by CagA-mediated PAR1 inhibition cooperates with deregulated SHP-2 in the morphogenetic activity of CagA.Infection with Helicobacter pylori strains bearing cagA (cytotoxin-associated gene A)-positive strains is the strongest risk factor for the development of gastric carcinoma, the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide (1–3). The cagA gene is located within a 40-kb DNA fragment, termed the cag pathogenicity island, which is specifically present in the genome of cagA-positive H. pylori strains (4–6). In addition to cagA, there are ∼30 genes in the cag pathogenicity island, many of which encode a bacterial type IV secretion system that delivers the cagA-encoded CagA protein into gastric epithelial cells (7–10). Upon delivery into gastric epithelial cells, CagA is localized to the plasma membrane, where it undergoes tyrosine phosphorylation at the C-terminal Glu-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Ala motifs by Src family kinases or c-Abl kinase (11–14). The C-terminal Glu-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Ala-containing region of CagA is noted for the structural diversity among distinct H. pylori isolates. Oncogenic potential of CagA has recently been confirmed by a study showing that systemic expression of CagA in mice induces gastrointestinal and hematological malignancies (15).When expressed in gastric epithelial cells, CagA induces morphological transformation termed the hummingbird phenotype, which is characterized by the development of one or two long and thin protrusions resembling the beak of the hummingbird. It has been thought that the hummingbird phenotype is related to the oncogenic action of CagA (7, 16–19). Pathophysiological relevance for the hummingbird phenotype in gastric carcinogenesis has recently been provided by the observation that infection with H. pylori carrying CagA with greater ability to induce the hummingbird phenotype is more closely associated with gastric carcinoma (20–23). Elevated motility of hummingbird cells (cells showing the hummingbird phenotype) may also contribute to invasion and metastasis of gastric carcinoma.In host cells, CagA interacts with the SHP-2 phosphatase, C-terminal Src kinase, and Crk adaptor in a tyrosine phosphorylation-dependent manner (16, 24, 25) and also associates with Grb2 adaptor and c-Met in a phosphorylation-independent manner (26, 27). Among these CagA targets, much attention has been focused on SHP-2 because the phosphatase has been recognized as a bona fide oncoprotein, gain-of-function mutations of which are found in various human malignancies (17, 18, 28). Stable interaction of CagA with SHP-2 requires CagA dimerization, which is mediated by a 16-amino acid CagA-multimerization (CM)² sequence present in the C-terminal region of CagA (29). Upon complex formation, CagA aberrantly activates SHP-2 and thereby elicits sustained ERK MAP kinase activation that promotes mitogenesis (30). Also, CagA-activated SHP-2 dephosphorylates and inhibits focal adhesion kinase (FAK), causing impaired focal adhesions. It has been shown previously that both aberrant ERK activation and FAK inhibition by CagA-deregulated SHP-2 are involved in induction of the hummingbird phenotype (31).Partitioning-defective 1 (PAR1)/microtubule affinity-regulating kinase (MARK) is an evolutionally conserved serine/threonine kinase originally isolated in C. elegans (32–34). Mammalian cells possess four structurally related PAR1 isoforms, PAR1a/MARK3, PAR1b/MARK2, PAR1c/MARK1, and PAR1d/MARK4 (35–37). Among these, PAR1a, PAR1b, and PAR1c are expressed in a variety of cells, whereas PAR1d is predominantly expressed in neural cells (35, 37). These PAR1 isoforms phosphorylate microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) and thereby destabilize microtubules (35, 38), allowing asymmetric distribution of molecules that are involved in the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity.In polarized epithelial cells, CagA disrupts the tight junctions and causes loss of apical-basolateral polarity (39, 40). This CagA activity involves the interaction of CagA with PAR1b/MARK2 (19, 41). CagA directly binds to the kinase domain of PAR1b in a tyrosine phosphorylation-independent manner and inhibits the kinase activity. Notably, CagA binds to PAR1b via the CM sequence (19). Because PAR1b is present as a dimer in cells (42), CagA may passively homodimerize upon complex formation with the PAR1 dimer via the CM sequence, and this PAR1-directed CagA dimer would form a stable complex with SHP-2 through its two SH2 domains.Because of the critical role of CagA in gastric carcinogenesis (7, 16–19), it is important to elucidate the molecular basis underlying the morphogenetic activity of CagA. In this study, we investigated the role of PAR1 isoforms in induction of the hummingbird phenotype by CagA, and we obtained evidence that CagA-mediated inhibition of PAR1 kinases contributes to the development of the morphological change by perturbing microtubules and non-muscle myosin II.     

Mcl-1 Degradation during Hepatocyte Lipoapoptosis

The mechanisms of free fatty acid-induced lipoapoptosis are incompletely understood. Here we demonstrate that Mcl-1, an anti-apoptotic member of the Bcl-2 family, was rapidly degraded in hepatocytes in response to palmitate and stearate by a proteasome-dependent pathway. Overexpression of a ubiquitin-resistant Mcl-1 mutant in Huh-7 cells attenuated palmitate-mediated Mcl-1 loss and lipoapoptosis; conversely, short hairpin RNA-targeted knockdown of Mcl-1 sensitized these cells to lipoapoptosis. Palmitate-induced Mcl-1 degradation was attenuated by the novel protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor rottlerin. Of the two human novel PKC isozymes, PKCδ and PKCθ, only activation of PKCθ was observed by phospho-immunoblot analysis. As compared with Jurkat cells, a smaller PKCθ polypeptide and mRNA were expressed in hepatocytes consistent with an alternative splice variant. Short hairpin RNA-mediated knockdown of PKCθ reduced Mcl-1 degradation and lipoapoptosis. Likewise, genetic deletion of Pkcθ also attenuated Mcl-1 degradation and cytotoxicity by palmitate in primary hepatocytes. During treatment with palmitate, rottlerin inhibited phosphorylation of Mcl-1 at Ser¹⁵⁹, a phosphorylation site previously implicated in Mcl-1 turnover. Consistent with these results, an Mcl-1 S159A mutant was resistant to degradation and improved cell survival during palmitate treatment. Collectively, these results implicate PKCθ-dependent destabilization of Mcl-1 as a mechanism contributing to hepatocyte lipoapoptosis.Current evidence suggests that hepatic steatosis is present in up to 30% of the American population (1). A subset of these individuals develop severe hepatic lipotoxicity, a syndrome referred to as NASH² (2), which can progress to cirrhosis and its chronic sequela (3, 4). A major risk factor for hepatic lipotoxicity is insulin resistance (5–7), resulting in excessive lipolysis within peripheral adipose tissue with release of high levels of free fatty acids (FFA) to the circulation. Circulating FFA are taken up by the liver via fatty acid transporter 5 and CD36 (8–10), and the bulk of hepatic neutral fat is derived from re-esterification of circulating FFA (8). Current concepts indicate that FFA, and not their esterified product (triglyceride), mediate hepatic lipotoxicity (11, 12). Elevated serum FFA correlate with liver disease severity (13–15), and therapies that enhance insulin sensitivity ameliorate hepatic lipotoxicity, in part, by decreasing plasma FFA (16). Hepatic FFA also accumulate in experimental steatohepatitis, further supporting a role for these nutrients in hepatic lipotoxicity (17). Saturated FFA are more strongly implicated in hepatic lipotoxicity than unsaturated FFA (18, 19). Saturated FFA induce hepatocyte apoptosis (20, 21), a cardinal feature of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (22), and serum biomarkers of apoptosis are useful for identifying hepatic lipotoxicity (23). Thus, FFA-mediated lipotoxicity occurs, in part, by apoptosis.Apoptosis is regulated by members of the Bcl-2 protein family (24). These proteins can be categorized into three subsets as follows: the guardians or anti-apoptotic members of this family, which include Bcl-2, A1, Mcl-1, Bcl-x_L, and Bcl-w; the multidomain executioners or proapoptotic members of this family, which include Bax and Bak; and the messengers or biosensors of cell death, which share only the third Bcl-2 homology domain and are referred to as BH3-only proteins. This last group of proteins includes Bid, Bim, Bmf, Puma, Noxa, Hrk, Bad, and Bik. We have previously reported that cytotoxic FFA induce Bim expression by a FoxO3a-dependent mechanism that contributes, in part, to lipoapoptosis by activating Bax (20, 21). However, Bax activation can be held in check by anti-apoptotic members of the Bcl-2 family suggesting their function may also be dysregulated during FFA-mediated cytotoxicity.Bcl-2 is not expressed in hepatocytes at the protein level (25), whereas Bcl-w and Bfl-1/A1 knock-out mice have no liver phenotype (26–28). However, both potent anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-x_L and Mcl-1 are expressed by hepatocytes and exhibit a liver phenotype in knock-out mice (29, 30), whereas up-regulation of Mcl-1 renders hepatocytes resistant to apoptosis (31–33). It has also been posited that cellular elimination of Mcl-1 is a critical step in certain proapoptotic cascades (34, 35). Mcl-1 is unique among Bcl-2 proteins in that it has a short half-life, 30–120 min in most cell types, due to the presence of two sequences rich in proline, glutamic acid, serine, and threonine, which target the protein for rapid degradation by the proteasome (36). Proteasomal degradation of Mcl-1 is promoted by ubiquitination, which in turn is regulated by various kinase cascades (36). Despite its potential importance, a role for Mcl-1 in regulating hepatocyte FFA-mediated lipoapoptosis remains unexplored.Given that FFA induce insulin resistance (37), the kinases potentially regulating lipoapoptosis are likely those also identified in insulin resistance syndromes, especially the novel PKC isoforms PKCδ and PKCθ (38). The novel PKC isoforms are activated by diacylglycerol, which rises in the presence of FFA (39–41), and diacylglycerol levels are significantly increased in NASH (42). A role for PKCδ in apoptosis has not been described. PKCθ has recently been shown to be activated by endoplasmic reticulum stress in liver cells (43) and lipids in vivo (44, 45). Furthermore, PKCθ has also been implicated in apoptosis of Jurkat cells, neuroblastoma cells, and myeloid leukemia cells (46, 47). However, neither its role in mediating lipoapoptosis nor modulating levels/activity of Bcl-2 proteins has been examined.This study addresses the role of Mcl-1 and PKCθ in FFA-induced lipoapoptosis. We identify a pathway that involves PKCθ-dependent proteasomal degradation of Mcl-1. Using inhibitors of various steps along this pathway, along with Mcl-1 mutants that are resistant to proteasomal degradation or Ser¹⁵⁹ phosphorylation, our studies implicate Mcl-1 degradation via a PKCθ-dependent process as a critical step in lipoapoptosis.     

��-Defensins in Enteric Innate Immunity: FUNCTIONAL PANETH CELL ��-DEFENSINS IN MOUSE COLONIC LUMEN*

Paneth cells are a secretory epithelial lineage that release dense core granules rich in host defense peptides and proteins from the base of small intestinal crypts. Enteric α-defensins, termed cryptdins (Crps) in mice, are highly abundant in Paneth cell secretions and inherently resistant to proteolysis. Accordingly, we tested the hypothesis that enteric α-defensins of Paneth cell origin persist in a functional state in the mouse large bowel lumen. To test this idea, putative Crps purified from mouse distal colonic lumen were characterized biochemically and assayed in vitro for bactericidal peptide activities. The peptides comigrated with cryptdin control peptides in acid-urea-PAGE and SDS-PAGE, providing identification as putative Crps. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry experiments showed that the molecular masses of the putative α-defensins matched those of the six most abundant known Crps, as well as N-terminally truncated forms of each, and that the peptides contain six Cys residues, consistent with identities as α-defensins. N-terminal sequencing definitively revealed peptides with N termini corresponding to full-length, (des-Leu)-truncated, and (des-Leu-Arg)-truncated N termini of Crps 1–4 and 6. Crps from mouse large bowel lumen were bactericidal in the low micromolar range. Thus, Paneth cell α-defensins secreted into the small intestinal lumen persist as intact and functional forms throughout the intestinal tract, suggesting that the peptides may mediate enteric innate immunity in the colonic lumen, far from their upstream point of secretion in small intestinal crypts.Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs)² are released by epithelial cells onto mucosal surfaces as effectors of innate immunity (1–5). In mammals, most AMPs derive from two major families, the cathelicidins and defensins (6). The defensins comprise the α-, β-, and θ-defensin subfamilies, which are defined by the presence of six cysteine residues paired in characteristic tridisulfide arrays (7). α-Defensins are highly abundant in two primary cell lineages: phagocytic leukocytes, primarily neutrophils, of myeloid origin and Paneth cells, which are secretory epithelial cells located at the base of the crypts of Lieberkühn in the small intestine (8–10). Neutrophil α-defensins are stored in azurophilic granules and contribute to non-oxidative microbial cell killing in phagolysosomes (11, 12), except in mice whose neutrophils lack defensins (13). In the small bowel, α-defensins and other host defense proteins (14–18) are released apically as components of Paneth cell secretory granules in response to cholinergic stimulation and after exposure to bacterial antigens (19). Therefore, the release of Paneth cell products into the crypt lumen is inferred to protect mitotically active crypt cells from colonization by potential pathogens and confer protection against enteric infection (7, 20, 21).Under normal, homeostatic conditions, Paneth cells are not found outside the small bowel, although they may appear ectopically in response to local inflammation throughout the gastrointestinal tract (22, 23). Paneth cell numbers increase progressively throughout the small intestine, occurring at highest numbers in the distal ileum (24). Mouse Paneth cells express numerous α-defensin isoforms, termed cryptdins (Crps) (25), that have broad spectrum antimicrobial activities (6, 26). Collectively, α-defensins constitute approximately seventy percent of the bactericidal peptide activity in mouse Paneth cell secretions (19), selectively killing bacteria by membrane-disruptive mechanisms (27–30). The role of Paneth cell α-defensins in gastrointestinal mucosal immunity is evident from studies of mice transgenic for human enteric α-defensin-5, HD-5, which are immune to infection by orally administered Salmonella enterica sv. typhimurium (S. typhimurium) (31).The biosynthesis of mature, bactericidal α-defensins from their inactive precursors requires activation by lineage-specific proteolytic convertases. In mouse Paneth cells, inactive ∼8.4-kDa Crp precursors are processed intracellularly into microbicidal ∼4-kDa Crps by specific cleavage events mediated by matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP-7) (32, 33). MMP-7 null mice exhibit increased susceptibility to systemic S. typhimurium infection and decreased clearance of orally administered non-invasive Escherichia coli (19, 32). Although the α-defensin proregions are sensitive to proteolysis, the mature, disulfide-stabilized peptides resist digestion by their converting enzymes in vitro, whether the convertase is MMP-7 (32), trypsin (34), or neutrophil serine proteinases (35). Because α-defensins resist proteolysis in vitro, we hypothesized that Paneth cell α-defensins resist degradation and remain in a functional state in the large bowel, a complex, hostile environment containing varied proteases of both host and microbial origin.Here, we report on the isolation and characterization of a population of enteric α-defensins from the mouse colonic lumen. Full-length and N-terminally truncated Paneth cell α-defensins were identified and are abundant in the distal large bowel lumen.     

PR55��, a Regulatory Subunit of PP2A, Specifically Regulates PP2A-mediated ��-Catenin Dephosphorylation

A central question in Wnt signaling is the regulation of β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Multiple kinases, including CKIα and GSK3, are involved in β-catenin phosphorylation. Protein phosphatases such as PP2A and PP1 have been implicated in the regulation of β-catenin. However, which phosphatase dephosphorylates β-catenin in vivo and how the specificity of β-catenin dephosphorylation is regulated are not clear. In this study, we show that PP2A regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation in vivo. We demonstrate that PP2A is required for Wnt/β-catenin signaling in Drosophila. Moreover, we have identified PR55α as the regulatory subunit of PP2A that controls β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. PR55α, but not the catalytic subunit, PP2Ac, directly interacts with β-catenin. RNA interference knockdown of PR55α elevates β-catenin phosphorylation and decreases Wnt signaling, whereas overexpressing PR55α enhances Wnt signaling. Taken together, our results suggest that PR55α specifically regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation and plays an essential role in Wnt signaling.Wnt/β-catenin signaling plays essential roles in development and tumorigenesis (1–3). Our previous work found that β-catenin is sequentially phosphorylated by CKIα⁴ and GSK3 (4), which creates a binding site for β-Trcp (5), leading to degradation via the ubiquitination/proteasome machinery (3). Mutations in β-catenin or APC genes that prevent β-catenin phosphorylation or ubiquitination/degradation lead ultimately to cancer (1, 2).In addition to the involvement of kinases, protein phosphatases, such as PP1, PP2A, and PP2C, are also implicated in Wnt/β-catenin regulation. PP2C and PP1 may regulate dephosphorylation of Axin and play positive roles in Wnt signaling (6, 7). PP2A is a multisubunit enzyme (8–10); it has been reported to play either positive or negative roles in Wnt signaling likely by targeting different components (11–21). Toward the goal of understanding the mechanism of β-catenin phosphorylation, we carried out siRNA screening targeting several major phosphatases, in which we found that PP2A dephosphorylates β-catenin. This is consistent with a recent study where PP2A is shown to dephosphorylate β-catenin in a cell-free system (18).PP2A consists of a catalytic subunit (PP2Ac), a structure subunit (PR65/A), and variable regulatory B subunits (PR/B, PR/B′, PR/B″, or PR/B‴). The substrate specificity of PP2A is thought to be determined by its B subunit (9). By siRNA screening, we further identified that PR55α, a regulatory subunit of PP2A, specifically regulates β-catenin phosphorylation and degradation. Mechanistically, we found that PR55α directly interacts with β-catenin and regulates PP2A-mediated β-catenin dephosphorylation in Wnt signaling.     

Inflammasome-dependent Caspase-1 Activation in Cervical Epithelial Cells Stimulates Growth of the Intracellular Pathogen Chlamydia trachomatis

Inflammasomes have been extensively characterized in monocytes and macrophages, but not in epithelial cells, which are the preferred host cells for many pathogens. Here we show that cervical epithelial cells express a functional inflammasome. Infection of the cells by Chlamydia trachomatis leads to activation of caspase-1, through a process requiring the NOD-like receptor family member NLRP3 and the inflammasome adaptor protein ASC. Secretion of newly synthesized virulence proteins from the chlamydial vacuole through a type III secretion apparatus results in efflux of K⁺ through glibenclamide-sensitive K⁺ channels, which in turn stimulates production of reactive oxygen species. Elevated levels of reactive oxygen species are responsible for NLRP3-dependent caspase-1 activation in the infected cells. In monocytes and macrophages, caspase-1 is involved in processing and secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-1β. However, in epithelial cells, which are not known to secrete large quantities of interleukin-1β, caspase-1 has been shown previously to enhance lipid metabolism. Here we show that, in cervical epithelial cells, caspase-1 activation is required for optimal growth of the intracellular chlamydiae.Chlamydia trachomatis is the most common cause of bacterial sexually transmitted disease in the United States, and it is the leading cause of preventable blindness in the world (1–5). Untreated, C. trachomatis infection in women can cause pelvic inflammatory disease, which can lead to infertility and ectopic pregnancy because of scarring of the ovaries and the Fallopian tubes (6). Infection by the lymphogranuloma venereum (LGV)² strain of C. trachomatis, which has become more common in North America and Europe (7, 8), is characterized by swelling and inflammation of the lymph nodes in the groin (9).Chlamydiae are intracellular pathogens that preferentially infect epithelial mucosa and have a biphasic infection cycle (10). A metabolically inactive form, the elementary body, infects the epithelial host cells through entry vesicles that avoid fusion with host cell lysosomes and develop into a membrane-bound inclusion (11–13). Despite their intravacuolar localization, chlamydiae are still able to acquire nutrients from the host cell and interact with host-cell signaling pathways (13–23). Within a few hours, the elementary bodies differentiate into larger, metabolically active reticulate bodies, which proliferate but are noninfectious. Depending on the strain of C. trachomatis, the reticulate bodies transform back into elementary bodies after 1–3 days and are released into the extracellular medium to infect other cells (11, 24, 25). Chlamydial species possess a type III secretion (T3S) system that secretes bacterial virulence factors into host cell cytosol and may control interactions between the inclusion and host-cell compartments (26).Long before the adaptive immune response is activated, infected epithelial cells produce proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (27), which recruit neutrophils to the site of infection and activate other immune effector cells. However, in many cases the immune system fails to clear the infection, and the chronic release of cytokines becomes a major contributor to the scarring and damage associated with the infection (28–30).The innate immune response during C. trachomatis infection is initiated by chlamydial pathogen-associated molecular patterns, including lipopolysaccharides, which bind to pattern recognition receptors such as Toll-like receptors and cytosolic NOD-like receptors (NLRs), ultimately promoting pro-inflammatory cytokine gene expression and secretion of the cytokine proteins (31–37). However, secretion of the key pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-1β is tightly regulated (38). First, pro-IL-1β is produced following activation of pattern recognition receptor, and the precursor is then cleaved into the mature form by the pro-inflammatory cysteine protease, caspase-1 (also known as interleukin-1 converting enzyme or ICE). The mechanism by which caspase-1 is activated in response to infection or tissue damage was found to be modulated by a macromolecular protein complex termed the “inflammasome,” which consists of an NLR family member, an adaptor protein (apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a caspase activation recruitment domain or ASC), and an inactive caspase-1 precursor (pro-caspase-1) (39, 40). Previous studies demonstrated that IL-1β is produced in response to chlamydial infection in dendritic cells, macrophages, and monocytes (41–44). Moreover, C. trachomatis or Chlamydia caviae infection activates caspase-1 in epithelial cells or monocytes (43, 45, 46). However, whether caspase-1 activation during chlamydial infection requires the formation of an inflammasome remains unclear.Previous studies have shown that different pathogens can cause inflammasome-mediated caspase-1 activation in macrophages and monocytes (47). However, epithelial cells lining mucosal surfaces are not only the preferred target for chlamydial infection and other intracellular pathogens but also play an important role in early host immune response to infection by secreting proinflammatory cytokines and chemokines (27). Although epithelial cells are not known to secrete large amounts of IL-1β, inflammasome-dependent caspase-1 activation in epithelial cells is known to contribute to lipid metabolism and membrane regeneration in epithelial cells damaged by the membrane-disrupting toxin, aerolysin (48). As lipids are sorted from the Golgi apparatus to the chlamydial inclusion (13, 15, 49), we therefore investigated whether C. trachomatis induces caspase-1 activation in epithelial cells via the assembly of an inflammasome. We demonstrated that C. trachomatis-induced caspase-1 activation is mediated by an inflammasome containing the NLR member, NLRP3. Several studies have demonstrated the involvement of T3S apparatus in inflammasome-mediated caspase-1 activation by different pathogens in macrophages and monocytes (50–56). Therefore, we further investigated the mechanism by which C. trachomatis triggers the formation of the NLRP3 inflammasome. Our results showed that metabolically active chlamydiae, relying on their T3S apparatus, cause K⁺ efflux, which in turn leads to formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and ultimately NLRP3-dependent caspase-1 activation. Epithelial cells do not typically secrete large amounts of IL-1β; instead, caspase-1 activation in cervical epithelial cells contributes to development of the chlamydial inclusion.     

Loop 2 Structure in Glycine and GABAA Receptors Plays a Key Role in Determining Ethanol Sensitivity

The present study tests the hypothesis that the structure of extracellular domain Loop 2 can markedly affect ethanol sensitivity in glycine receptors (GlyRs) and γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs). To test this, we mutated Loop 2 in the α1 subunit of GlyRs and in the γ subunit of α1β2γ2GABA_ARs and measured the sensitivity of wild type and mutant receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes to agonist, ethanol, and other agents using two-electrode voltage clamp. Replacing Loop 2 of α1GlyR subunits with Loop 2 from the δGABA_AR (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit, reduced ethanol threshold and increased the degree of ethanol potentiation without altering general receptor function. Similarly, replacing Loop 2 of the γ subunit of GABA_ARs with δL2 shifted the ethanol threshold from 50 mm in WT to 1 mm in the GABA_A γ-δL2 mutant. These findings indicate that the structure of Loop 2 can profoundly affect ethanol sensitivity in GlyRs and GABA_ARs. The δL2 mutations did not affect GlyR or GABA_AR sensitivity, respectively, to Zn²⁺ or diazepam, which suggests that these δL2-induced changes in ethanol sensitivity do not extend to all allosteric modulators and may be specific for ethanol or ethanol-like agents. To explore molecular mechanisms underlying these results, we threaded the WT and δL2 GlyR sequences onto the x-ray structure of the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric ligand-gated ion channel homologue (GLIC). In addition to being the first GlyR model threaded on GLIC, the juxtaposition of the two structures led to a possible mechanistic explanation for the effects of ethanol on GlyR-based on changes in Loop 2 structure.Alcohol abuse and dependence are significant problems in our society, with ∼14 million people in the United States being affected (1, 2). Alcohol causes over 100,000 deaths in the United States, and alcohol-related issues are estimated to cost nearly 200 billion dollars annually (2). To address this, considerable attention has focused on the development of medications to prevent and treat alcohol-related problems (3–5). The development of such medications would be aided by a clear understanding of the molecular structures on which ethanol acts and how these structures influence receptor sensitivity to ethanol.Ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs)² have received substantial attention as putative sites of ethanol action that cause its behavioral effects (6–12). Research in this area has focused on investigating the effects of ethanol on two large superfamilies of LGICs: 1) the Cys-loop superfamily of LGICs (13, 14), whose members include nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-hydroxytryptamine₃, γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A), γ-aminobutyric acid type C, and glycine receptors (GlyRs) (10, 11, 15–20) and 2) the glutamate superfamily, including N-methyl d-aspartate, α-amino-3-hydroxyisoxazolepropionic acid, and kainate receptors (21, 22). Recent studies have also begun investigating ethanol action in the ATP-gated P2X superfamily of LGICs (23–25).A series of studies that employed chimeric and mutagenic strategies combined with sulfhydryl-specific labeling identified key regions within Cys-loop receptors that appear to be initial targets for ethanol action that also can determine the sensitivity of the receptors to ethanol (7–12, 18, 19, 26–30). This work provides several lines of evidence that position 267 and possibly other sites in the transmembrane (TM) domain of GlyRs and homologous sites in GABA_ARs are targets for ethanol action and that mutations at these sites can influence ethanol sensitivity (8, 9, 26, 31).Growing evidence from GlyRs indicates that ethanol also acts on the extracellular domain. The initial findings came from studies demonstrating that α1GlyRs are more sensitive to ethanol than are α2GlyRs despite the high (∼78%) sequence homology between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (32). Further work found that an alanine to serine exchange at position 52 (A52S) in Loop 2 can eliminate the difference in ethanol sensitivity between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (18, 20, 33). These studies also demonstrated that mutations at position 52 in α1GlyRS and the homologous position 59 in α2GlyRs controlled the sensitivity of these receptors to a novel mechanistic ethanol antagonist (20). Collectively, these studies suggest that there are multiple sites of ethanol action in α1GlyRs, with one site located in the TM domain (e.g. position 267) and another in the extracellular domain (e.g. position 52).Subsequent studies revealed that the polarity of the residue at position 52 plays a key role in determining the sensitivity of GlyRs to ethanol (20). The findings with polarity in the extracellular domain contrast with the findings at position 267 in the TM domain, where molecular volume, but not polarity, significantly affected ethanol sensitivity (9). Taken together, these findings indicate that the physical-chemical parameters of residues at positions in the extracellular and TM domains that modulate ethanol effects and/or initiate ethanol action in GlyRs are not uniform. Thus, knowledge regarding the physical-chemical properties that control agonist and ethanol sensitivity is key for understanding the relationship between the structure and the actions of ethanol in LGICs (19, 31, 34–40).GlyRs and GABA_ARs, which differ significantly in their sensitivities to ethanol, offer a potential method for identifying the structures that control ethanol sensitivity. For example, α1GlyRs do not reliably respond to ethanol concentrations less than 10 mm (32, 33, 41). Similarly, γ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α1β2γ2), the most predominantly expressed GABA_ARs in the central nervous system, are insensitive to ethanol concentrations less than 50 mm (42, 43). In contrast, δ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α4β3δ) have been shown to be sensitive to ethanol concentrations as low as 1–3 mm (44–51). Sequence alignment of α1GlyR, γGABA_AR, and δGABA_AR revealed differences between the Loop 2 regions of these receptor subunits. Since prior studies found that mutations of Loop 2 residues can affect ethanol sensitivity (19, 20, 39), the non-conserved residues in Loop 2 of GlyR and GABA_AR subunits could provide the physical-chemical and structural bases underlying the differences in ethanol sensitivity between these receptors.The present study tested the hypothesis that the structure of Loop 2 can markedly affect the ethanol sensitivity of GlyRs and GABA_ARs. To accomplish this, we performed multiple mutations that replaced the Loop 2 region of the α1 subunit in α1GlyRs and the Loop 2 region of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with corresponding non-conserved residues from the δ subunit of GABA_AR and tested the sensitivity of these receptors to ethanol. As predicted, replacing Loop 2 of WT α1GlyRs with the homologous residues from the δGABA_AR subunit (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit (γL2), markedly increased the sensitivity of the receptor to ethanol. Similarly, replacing the non-conserved residues of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with δL2 also markedly increased ethanol sensitivity of GABA_ARs. These findings support the hypothesis and suggest that Loop 2 may play a role in controlling ethanol sensitivity across the Cys-loop superfamily of receptors. The findings also provide the basis for suggesting structure-function relationships in a new molecular model of the GlyR based on the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric LGIC homologue (GLIC).     

Adiponectin Activates AMP-activated Protein Kinase in Muscle Cells via APPL1/LKB1-dependent and Phospholipase C/Ca2+/Ca2+/Calmodulin-dependent Protein Kinase Kinase-dependent Pathways

The binding of the adaptor protein APPL1 to adiponectin receptors is necessary for adiponectin-induced AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation in muscle, yet the underlying molecular mechanism remains unknown. Here we show that in muscle cells adiponectin and metformin induce AMPK activation by promoting APPL1-dependent LKB1 cytosolic translocation. APPL1 mediates adiponectin signaling by directly interacting with adiponectin receptors and enhances LKB1 cytosolic localization by anchoring this kinase in the cytosol. Adiponectin also activates another AMPK upstream kinase Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase by activating phospholipase C and subsequently inducing Ca²⁺ release from the endoplasmic reticulum, which plays a minor role in AMPK activation. Our results show that in muscle cells adiponectin is able to activate AMPK via two distinct mechanisms as follows: a major pathway (the APPL1/LKB1-dependent pathway) that promotes the cytosolic localization of LKB1 and a minor pathway (the phospholipase C/Ca²⁺/Ca²⁺/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase kinase-dependent pathway) that stimulates Ca²⁺ release from intracellular stores.Adiponectin, an adipokine abundantly expressed in adipose tissue, exhibits anti-diabetic, anti-inflammatory, and anti-atherogenic properties and hence is a potential therapeutic target for various metabolic diseases (1–3). The beneficial effects of adiponectin are mediated through the direct interaction of adiponectin with its cell surface receptors, AdipoR1 and AdipoR2 (4, 5). Adiponectin increases fatty acid oxidation and glucose uptake in muscle cells by activating AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK)³ (4, 6), which depends on the interaction of AdipoR1 with the adaptor protein APPL1 (Adaptor protein containing Pleckstrin homology domain, Phosphotyrosine binding domain, and Leucine zipper motif) (5). However, the underlying mechanisms by which APPL1 mediates adiponectin signaling to AMPK activation and other downstream targets remain unclear.AMPK is a serine/threonine protein kinase that acts as a master sensor of cellular energy balance in mammalian cells by regulating glucose and lipid metabolism (7, 8). AMPK is composed of a catalytic α subunit and two noncatalytic regulatory subunits, β and γ. The NH₂-terminal catalytic domain of the AMPKα subunit is highly conserved and contains the activating phosphorylation site (Thr¹⁷²) (9). Two AMPK variants, α1 and α2, exist in mammalian cells that show different localization patterns. AMPKα1 subunit is localized in non-nuclear fractions, whereas the AMPKα2 subunit is found in both nucleus and non-nuclear fractions (10). Biochemical regulation of AMPK activation occurs through various mechanisms. An increase in AMP level stimulates the binding of AMP to the γ subunit, which induces a conformational change in the AMPK heterotrimer and results in AMPK activation (11). Studies have shown that the increase in AMPK activity is not solely via AMP-dependent conformational change, rather via phosphorylation by upstream kinases, LKB1 and CaMKK. Dephosphorylation by protein phosphatases is also important in regulating the activity of AMPK (12).LKB1 has been considered as a constitutively active serine/threonine protein kinase that is ubiquitously expressed in all tissues (13, 14). Under conditions of high cellular energy stress, LKB1 acts as the primary AMPK kinase through an AMP-dependent mechanism (15–17). Under normal physiological conditions, LKB1 is predominantly localized in the nucleus. LKB1 is translocated to the cytosol, either by forming a heterotrimeric complex with Ste20-related adaptor protein (STRADα/β) and mouse protein 25 (MO25α/β) or by associating with an LKB1-interacting protein (LIP1), to exert its biological function (18–22). Although LKB1 has been shown to mediate contraction- and adiponectin-induced activation of AMPK in muscle cells, the underlying molecular mechanisms remain elusive (15, 23).CaMKK is another upstream kinase of AMPK, which shows considerable sequence and structural homology with LKB1 (24–26). The two isoforms of CaMKK, CaMKKα and CaMKKβ, encoded by two distinct genes, share ∼70% homology at the amino acid sequence level and exhibit a wide expression in rodent tissues, including skeletal muscle (27–34). Unlike LKB1, AMPK phosphorylation mediated by CaMKKs is independent of AMP and is dependent only on Ca²⁺/calmodulin (35). Hence, it is possible that an LKB1-independent activation of AMPK by CaMKK exists in muscle cells. However, whether and how adiponectin stimulates this pathway in muscle cells are not known.In this study, we demonstrate that in muscle cells adiponectin induces an APPL1-dependent LKB1 translocation from the nucleus to the cytosol, leading to increased AMPK activation. Adiponectin also activates CaMKK by stimulating intracellular Ca²⁺ release via the PLC-dependent mechanism, which plays a minor role in activation of AMPK. Taken together, our results demonstrate that enhanced cytosolic localization of LKB1 and Ca²⁺-induced activation of CaMKK are the mechanisms underlying adiponectin-stimulated AMPK activation in muscle cells.