The DNA-based structure of human chromosome 5 in interphase

In contrast to those of metaphase chromosomes, the shape, length, and architecture of human interphase chromosomes are not well understood. This is mainly due to technical problems in the visualization of interphase chromosomes in total and of their substructures. We analyzed the structure of chromosomes in interphase nuclei through use of high-resolution multicolor banding (MCB), which paints the total shape of chromosomes and creates a DNA-mediated, chromosome-region-specific, pseudocolored banding pattern at high resolution. A microdissection-derived human chromosome 5-specific MCB probe mixture was hybridized to human lymphocyte interphase nuclei harvested for routine chromosome analysis, as well as to interphase nuclei from HeLa cells arrested at different phases of the cell cycle. The length of the axis of interphase chromosome 5 was determined, and the shape and MCB pattern were compared with those of metaphase chromosomes. We show that, in lymphocytes, the length of the axis of interphase chromosome 5 is comparable to that of a metaphase chromosome at 600-band resolution. Consequently, the concept of chromosome condensation during mitosis has to be reassessed. In addition, chromosome 5 in interphase is not as straight as metaphase chromosomes, being bent and/or folded. The shape and banding pattern of interphase chromosome 5 of lymphocytes and HeLa cells are similar to those of the corresponding metaphase chromosomes at all stages of the cell cycle. The MCB pattern also allows the detection and characterization of chromosome aberrations. This may be of fundamental importance in establishing chromosome analyses in nondividing cells.     

Specific staining of human chromosomes in Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell lines demonstrates interphase chromosome territories

Summary In spite of Carl Rabl's (1885) and Theodor Boveri's (1909) early hypothesis that chromosomes occupy discrete territories or domains within the interphase nucleus, evidence in favor pf this hypothesis has been limited and indirect so far in higher plants and animals. The alternative possibility that the chromatin fiber of single chromosomes might be extended throughout the major part of even the whole interphase nucleus has been considered for many years. In the latter case, chromosomes would only exist as discrete chromatin bodies during mitosis but not during interphase. Both possibilities are compatible with Boveri's well established paradigm of chromosome individuality. Here we show that an active human X chromosome contained as the only human chromosome in a Chinese hamster x man hybrid cell line can be visualized both in metaphse plates and in interphase nuclei after in situ hybridization with either ³H- or biotin-labeled human genomic DNA. We demonstrate that this chromosome is organized as a distinct chromatin body throughout interphase. In addition, evidence for the territorial organization of human chromosomes is also presented for another hybrid cell line containing several autosomes and the human X chromosome. These findings are discussed in the context of our present knowledge of the organization and topography of interphase chromosomes. General applications of a strategy aimed at specific staining of individual chromosomes in experimental and clinical cytogenetics are briefly considered.     

Conservation of relative chromosome positioning in normal and cancer cells

Chromosomes exist in the interphase nucleus as individual chromosome territories. It is unclear to what extent chromosome territories occupy particular positions with respect to each other and how structural rearrangements, such as translocations, affect chromosome organization within the cell nucleus. Here we analyze the relative interphase positioning of chromosomes in mouse lymphoma cells compared to normal splenocytes. We show that in a lymphoma cell line derived from an ATM(-/-) mouse, two translocated chromosomes are preferentially positioned in close proximity to each other. The relative position of the chromosomes involved in these translocations is conserved in normal splenocytes. Relative positioning of chromosomes in normal splenocytes is not due to their random distribution in the interphase nucleus and persists during mitosis. These observations demonstrate that the relative arrangement of chromosomes in the interphase nucleus can be conserved between normal and cancer cells and our data support the notion that physical proximity facilitates rearrangements between chromosomes.     

Laser UV microirradiation of interphase nuclei and post-treatment with caffeine

Summary Laser UV microirradiation of Chinese hamster interphase cells combined with caffeine post-treatment produced different patterns of chromosome damage in mitosis following irradiation of a small area of the nucleus that may be classified in three categories: I) intact metaphase figures, II) chromosome damage confined to a small area of the metaphase spread, III) mitotic figures with damage on all chromosomes. Category III might be the consequence of a non-localized distortion of nuclear metabolism. By contrast, category II may reflect localized DNA damage induced by microirradiation, which could not be efficiently repaired due to the effect of caffeine. If this interpretation is right, in metaphase figures of category II chromosome damage should occur only at the irradiation site. The effect might then be used to investigate neighbourhood relationships of individual chromosomes in the interphase nucleus.     

Chromosome arrangement and nuclear architecture but not centromeric sequences are conserved between Arabidopsis thaliana and Arabidopsis lyrata

In contrast to the situation described for mammals and Drosophila, chromosome territory (CT) arrangement and somatic homologous pairing in interphase nuclei of Arabidopsis thaliana (n = 5) are predominantly random except for a more frequent association of the chromosomes bearing a homologous nucleolus organizer region. To find out whether this chromosome arrangement is also characteristic for other species of the genus Arabidopsis, we investigated Arabidopsis lyrata ssp. lyrata (n = 8), one of the closest relatives of A. thaliana. First, we determined the size of each chromosome and chromosome arm, the sequence type of centromeric repeats and their distribution between individual centromeres and the position of the 5S/45S rDNA arrays in A. lyrata. Then we demonstrated that CT arrangement, homologous pairing and sister chromatid alignment of distinct euchromatic and/or heterochromatic regions within A. lyrata interphase nuclei are similar to that in A. thaliana nuclei. Thus, the arrangement of interphase chromosomes appears to be conserved between both taxa that diverged about 5 million years ago. Since the chromosomes of A. lyrata resemble those of the presumed ancestral karyotype, a similar arrangement of interphase chromosomes is also to be expected for other closely related diploid species of the Brassicaceae family.     

Individual interphase chromosome domains revealed by in situ hybridization

Summary The position and arrangement of individual chromosomes in interphase nuclei were examined in mouse-human cell hybrids by in situ hybridization of biotinylated human DNA probes. Intense and even labeling of human chromosomes with little background was observed when polyethylene glycol and Tween-20 were included in hybridization solutions. Human interphase chromosomes were separated from each other in the nucleus, and were confined to well localized domains. Hybrid cells with a single human chromosome showed a reproducible position of this chromosome in the nucleus. Some chromosomes appeared to have a characteristic folding pattern in interphase. Optical section as well as electron microscopy of labeled regions revealed the presence of 0.2 m wide fibers in each interphase domain, as well as adjacent, locally extended 500 nm fibers. Such fibers are consistent with previously proposed structural models of interphase chromosomes.     

Detection of chromosome aberrations in metaphase and interphase tumor cells by in situ hybridization using chromosome-specific library probes

Summary Chromosome aberrations in two glioma cell lines were analyzed using biotinylated DNA library probes that specifically decorate chromosomes 1, 4, 7, 18 and 22 from pter to qter. Numerical changes, deletions and rearrangements of these chromosomes were radily visualized in metaphase spreads, as well as in early prophase and interphase nuclei. Complete chromosomes, deleted chromosomes and segments of translocated chromosomes were rapidly delineated in very complex karyotypes. Simultaneous hybridizations with additional subregional probes were used to further define aberrant chromosomes. Digital image analysis was used to quantitate the total complement of specific chromosomal DNAs in individual metaphase and interphase cells of each cell line. In spite of the fact that both glioma lines have been passaged in vitro for many years, an under-representation of chromosome 22 and an over-representation of chromosome 7 (specifically 7p) were observed. These observations agree with previous studies on gliomas. In addition, sequences of chromosome 4 were also found to be under-represented, especially in TC 593. These analyses indicate the power of these methods for pinpointing chromosome segments that are altered in specific types of tumors.     

Detection of chromosome aberrations in the human interphase nucleus by visualization of specific target DNAs with radioactive and non-radioactive in situ hybridization techniques: diagnosis of trisomy 18 with probe L1.84

Summary The localization of chromosome 18 in human interphase nuclei is demonstrated by use of radioactive and nonradioactive in situ hybridization techniques with a DNA clone designated L1.84. This clone represents a distinct subpopulation of the repetitive human alphoid DNA family, located in the centric region of chromosome 18. Under stringent hybridization conditions hybridization of L1.84 is restricted to chromosome 18 and reflects the number of these chromosomes present in the nuclei, namely, two in normal diploid human cells and three in nuclei from cells with trisomy 18. Under conditions of low stringency, cross-hybridization with other subpopulations of the alphoid DNA family occurs in the centromeric regions of the whole chromosome complement, and numerous hybridization sites are detected over interphase nuclei. Detection of chromosome-specific target DNAs by non-radioactive in situ hybridization with appropriate DNA probes cloned from individual chromosomal subregions presents a rapid means of identifying directly numerical or even structural chromosome aberrations in the interphase nucleus. Present limitations and future applications of interphase cytogenetics are discussed.     

Do individual allocyclic chromosomes in metaphase reflect their interphase domains?

Summary Individual S phase allocyclic chromosomes have been analyzed in Bloom syndrome lymphocytes, in cells with an r(9), and in hypotetraploid Ehrlich mouse ascites cells treated with 1-methyl-2-benzyl hydrazine. On the basis of the following observations, we conclude that such chromosomes more or less reflect their domains in interphase: (1) The S phase allocyclic chromosomes have the same structure as S phase prematurely condensed chromatin (PCC) in fused cells; in other words they form limited areas of chromatin dots; (2) the allocyclic chromosome is the only chromosome in a metaphase plate which synthesizes DNA simultanneously with interphase nuclei; (3) the size of the allocyclic chromosomes is related to the size of the corresponding metaphase chromosome; and (4) the S phase allocyclic chromosomes resemble closely the chromosome domains in interphase made visible with biotinylated human DNA. A variety of evidence shows that most allocyclic chromosomes are simply left behind in their cycle, which presumably is caused by a deletion or inactivation of a hypothetical coiling center situated on each chromosome arm.     

The chromosomes of Puschkinia libanotica during mitosis

The chromosome complement of Puschkinia libanotica is described. In addition to five pairs of A chromosomes plants may possess up to 7 B chromosomes. Part of the long arm of the B chromosome gives rise to a heterochromatic mass in interphase nuclei and this can be seen to be a double structure in G₁ nuclei and a quadruple structure in G₂ nuclei. It is believed that these configurations represent the pre- and post-replication forms of subchromatids in the heterochromatic segment of the B chromosome. Microdensitometry of metaphase chromosomes shows that the segment of the B chromosome that is heterochromatic during interphase has no more DNA per unit volume than any of the euchromatic A chromosomes.     

Reliability and efficiency of interphase-fish with alpha-satellite probe for detection of aneuploidy

Early diagnosis is very important in pre- and postnatal diagnosis of Down syndrome. This study examines the use of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to detect trisomy 21 in interphase nuclei and metaphase chromosome obtained from fifty-four Down syndrome patients with a regular type trisomy 21. Three of them showed six hybridization signals on both interphase nuclei and metaphase spreads instead of five signals corresponding to two chromosomes 13 and three chromosomes 21 although they were cytogenetically trisomy 21. Simultaneous application of probe combination revealed that one of the extra signals of chromosomes 13/21 a-satellite probe was located on chromosome 22 in two cases and one extra signal on chromosomes 15 in one case. In addition, another case showed four hybridization signals on both interphase nuclei and metaphase spreads instead of five signals, indicating deletion of the chromosome specific alpha-satellite DNA sequence of chromosome 13/21. These centromeric sequence changes may have pathological significance in the appearance of aneuploidy because they may be involved in the important centromere function.     

Global chromosome positions are transmitted through mitosis in mammalian cells

We investigated positioning of chromosomes during the cell cycle in live mammalian cells with a combined experimental and computational approach. By non-invasive labeling of chromosome subsets and tracking by 4D imaging, we could show that no global rearrangements occurred in interphase. Using the same assay, we also observed a striking order of chromosomes throughout mitosis. By contrast, our computer simulation based on stochastic movements of individual chromosomes predicted randomization of chromosome order in mitosis. In vivo, a quantitative assay for single chromosome positioning during mitosis revealed strong similarities between daughter and mother cells. These results demonstrate that global chromosome positions are heritable through the cell cycle in mammalian cells. Based on tracking of labeled chromosomes and centromeres during chromosome segregation and experimental perturbations of chromosomal order, we propose that chromosome specific timing of sister chromatid separation transmits chromosomal positions from one cell generation to the next.     

Combined Fluorescent-Chromogenic In Situ Hybridization for Identification and Laser Microdissection of Interphase Chromosomes

Chromosome territories constitute the most conspicuous feature of nuclear architecture, and they exhibit non-random distribution patterns in the interphase nucleus. We observed that in cell nuclei from humans with Down Syndrome two chromosomes 21 frequently localize proximal to one another and distant from the third chromosome. To systematically investigate whether the proximally positioned chromosomes were always the same in all cells, we developed an approach consisting of sequential FISH and CISH combined with laser-microdissection of chromosomes from the interphase nucleus and followed by subsequent chromosome identification by microsatellite allele genotyping. This approach identified proximally positioned chromosomes from cultured cells, and the analysis showed that the identity of the chromosomes proximally positioned varies. However, the data suggest that there may be a tendency of the same chromosomes to be positioned close to each other in the interphase nucleus of trisomic cells. The protocol described here represents a powerful new method for genome analysis.     

Increased complexity of radiation-induced chromosome aberrations consistent with a mechanism of sequential formation

Complex chromosome aberrations (any exchange involving three or more breaks in two or more chromosomes) are effectively induced in peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) after exposure to low doses (mostly single particles) of densely ionising high-linear energy transfer (LET) alpha-particle radiation. The complexity, when observed by multiplex fluorescence in situ hybridisation (m-FISH), shows that commonly four but up to eight different chromosomes can be involved in each rearrangement. Given the territorial organisation of chromosomes in interphase and that only a very small fraction of the nucleus is irradiated by each alpha-particle traversal, the aim of this study is to address how aberrations of such complexity can be formed. To do this, we applied theoretical "cycle" analyses using m-FISH paint detail of PBL in their first cell division after exposure to high-LET alpha-particles. In brief, "cycle" analysis deconstructs the aberration "observed" by m-FISH to make predictions as to how it could have been formed in interphase. We propose from this that individual high-LET alpha-particle-induced complex aberrations may be formed by the misrepair of damaged chromatin in single physical "sites" within the nucleus, where each "site" is consistent with an "area" corresponding to the interface of two to three different chromosome territories. Limited migration of damaged chromatin is "allowed" within this "area". Complex aberrations of increased size, reflecting the path of alpha-particle nuclear intersection, are formed through the sequential linking of these individual sites by the involvement of common chromosomes.     

Interphase chromosome structures of human cells

Major intermediates of chromosome condensation in erythroleukemia K562 cells are presented. Interphase chromatin structures became visible after reversal of permeabilization. Large-scale chromatin structures and the development of individual interphase chromosomes were observed by fluorescence microscopy. In the linear arrangement the following major intermediates of K562 chromatin condensation could be distinguished: (1) the most decondensed chromatin veil, (2) chromatin ribbon, (3) chromatin funnel, a new intermediate regarded as the earliest visible form of interphase chromosomes, (4) chromatin body, (5) 300 nm chromatin fiber, (6) u, v, or s forms of chromosomes, and (7) linear chromosomes. The observations made in nuclei of K562 cells conform to the model of helical coil chromosome condensation.     

Structure and dynamics of interphase chromosomes

During interphase chromosomes decondense, but fluorescent in situ hybridization experiments reveal the existence of distinct territories occupied by individual chromosomes inside the nuclei of most eukaryotic cells. We use computer simulations to show that the existence and stability of territories is a kinetic effect that can be explained without invoking an underlying nuclear scaffold or protein-mediated interactions between DNA sequences. In particular, we show that the experimentally observed territory shapes and spatial distances between marked chromosome sites for human, Drosophila, and budding yeast chromosomes can be reproduced by a parameter-free minimal model of decondensing chromosomes. Our results suggest that the observed interphase structure and dynamics are due to generic polymer effects: confined Brownian motion conserving the local topological state of long chain molecules and segregation of mutually unentangled chains due to topological constraints.     

Monoclonal antibody with specificity to mitotic chromosomes of primates

Fusion of a cell in mitosis with a cell in interphase results in the condensation of chromatin in the interphase nucleus into chromosomes. Premature chromosome condensation is caused by certain proteins, called mitotic factors, that are present in the mitotic cell and are localized on chromosomes. Extracts from mitotic cells were used to immunize mice to produce monoclonal antibodies specific for cells in mitosis. Among the antibodies obtained, the MPM-4 antibody defines a 125-kD polypeptide antigen located on mitotic chromosomes by indirect immunofluorescence. Although the polypeptide antigen is present in approximately equal concentrations in extracts of interphase cells and mitotic cells, as revealed by immunoblots, it cannot be detected cytologically in the former. Cell fractionation experiments showed that the 125-kD antigen is found in the cytoplasm of interphase cells and metaphase cells, but is concentrated in fractions containing metaphase chromosomes, although not detectable in interphase nuclei. Even though the antigen is apparently primate-specific, it binds to mitotic chromosomes and prematurely condensed chromosomes in human-rodent cell hybrids without regard to the species of origin of the mitotic inducer. The presence of the antigen in the cytoplasm of interphase cells and the chromosomes of mitotic cells suggests a relationship between the presence of the antigen on chromosomes and the process of chromosome condensation and decondensation.