Molecular phylogeny and evolution of mosquito parasitic Microsporidia (Microsporidia: Amblyosporidae)

Amblyospora species and other aquatic Microsporidia were isolated from mosquitoes, black flies, and copepods and the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene was sequenced. Comparative phylogenetic analysis showed a correspondence between the mosquito host genera and their Amblyspora parasite species. There is a clade of Amblyospora species that infect the Culex host group and a clade of Amblyospora that infect the Aedes/Ochlerotatus group of mosquitoes. Parathelohania species, which infect Anopheles mosquitoes, may be the sister group to the Amblyospora in the same way that the Anopheles mosquitoes are thought to be the sister group to the Culex and Aedes mosquitoes. In addition, by sequence analysis of small subunit rDNA from spores, we identified the alternate copepod host for four species of Amblyospora. Amblyospora species are specific for their primary (mosquito) host and each of these mosquito species serves as host for only one Amblyospora species. On the other hand, a single species of copepod can serve as an intermediate host to several Amblyospora species and some Amblyospora species may be found in more than one copepod host. Intrapredatorus barri, a species within a monotypic genus with Amblyospora-like characteristics, falls well within the Amblyospora clade. The genera Edhazardia and Culicospora, which do not have functional meiospores and do not require an intermediate host, but which do have a lanceolate spore type which is ultrastructurally very similar to the Amblyospora spore type found in the copepod, cluster among the Amblyospora species. In the future, the genus Amblyospora may be redefined to include species without obligate intermediate hosts. Hazardia, Berwaldia, Larssonia, Trichotuzetia, and Gurleya are members of a sister group to the Amblyospora clades infecting mosquitoes, and may be representatives of a large group of aquatic parasites.     

Microsporidia: a journey through radical taxonomical revisions

Microsporidia are obligate intracellular parasites of medical and commercial importance, characterized by a severe reduction, or even absence, of cellular components typical of eukaryotes such as mitochondria, Golgi apparatus and flagella. This simplistic cellular organization has made it difficult to infer the evolutionary relationship of Microsporidia to other eukaryotes, because they lack many characters historically used to make such comparisons. Eventually, it was suggested that this simplicity might be due to Microsporidia representing a very early eukaryotic lineage that evolved prior to the origin of many typically eukaryotic features, in particular the mitochondrion. This hypothesis was supported by the first biochemical and molecular studies of the group. In the last decade, however, contrasting evidence has emerged, mostly from molecular sequences, that show Microsporidia are related to fungi, and it is now widely acknowledged that features previously recognized as primitive are instead highly derived adaptations to their obligate parasitic lifestyle. The various sharply differing views on microsporidian evolution resulted in several radical reappraisals of their taxonomy. Here we will chronologically review the causes and consequences for these taxonomic revisions, with a special emphasis on why the unique cellular and genomic features of Microsporidia lured scientists towards the wrong direction for so long.     

Meiosis in Microsporidia: effects on biological cycles]

Synaptinemal complexes have been demonstrated in 7 microsporidian species belonging to 6 different genera (Gurleya, Thelohania, Pleistophora, Tuzetia, Baculea, Glugea). Thus, it can be presumed that a meiosis and consequently a karyogamy occur during their life cycle. Meisis occurs at the beginning of sporogony; therefore, karyogamy, must occur between spore and merogany, i.e. during the poorly known part of the life cycle. In the microsporidian species studied, with uninucleate spores and diplokaryotic merogony (Thelohania for instance), the 2 joined nuclei, each of them containing meiotic chromosomes, not only fail to fuse, but actually separate at the beginning of sporogony; afterwards, each of them undergoes meiosis. Their separation is accompanied by the appearance of an organelle whose structure and function are poorly understood. However, its structure resembles that of the kinetic center. The Nosema species studied do not have synaptinemal complexes; thus, their life cycle is difficult to understand: either karyogamy and meiosis occur during the unobserved part of the life-cycle, or sexual phanomena are absent altogether. In the latter case, the Nosema-type life cycle might be limited to vegetative multiplication which could be explained by the dimorphism theory of Microsporidia. It is shown also in the present study that the life cycle of Microsporidia does not involve haploid organisms which it might be thought to contain by comparing it with the cycles of sporozoa.     

Infection of Hydra by Microsporidia

A microsporidian infection in a laboratory clone of Hydra littoralis has been observed, and the parasite has been tentatively identified as a species of Plistophora . Infected hydra continue to bud and regenerate normally and show no significant physiological or morphological changes. Sexual crossing of infected and non-infected animals shows that the infection is transmitted by the ovum but not by the sperm. Continuous exposure of infected hydra to Fumidil B in solution resulted in the disappearance of all Plistophora spores after a five week period of treatment, and the clones of the treated animals have remained parasite-free for more than a year.     

Macrotaxonomy of the Microsporidia phylum

Different classification of the phylum Microsporidia (Sprague, 1977; Weiser, 1977; Issi, 1986; Sprague, Becnel, Hazard, 1992) are briefly discussed. New taxa (families Glugoididae, Flabelliformidae, Neopereziidae, Rectosporidae and superfamilies Encephalitozoonoidea, Cylindrosporoidea) are proposed in the new classification of Microsoridia.     

Microsporidia and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome

Microsporidia is a common term that has been used to refer to a group of eukaryotic, obligate intracellular protozoan parasites belonging to the phylum Microspora. They are important agricultural parasites, contaminating commercial insects; they are also important by infecting laboratory rodents, rabbits and primates. Ever since the early cases found by Magarino Torres, who reported the presence of Encephalitozoon in a patient suffering of a meningoencephalomyelitis, some human pathology caused by microsporidia has been described. However, only after the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome outbreak have these organisms appeared as significant etiological agents in different pathologies. Even so, they remain underestimated. In the present article, the importance of microsporidia for the human pathology in immunocompromised host has been stressed.     

Polyamine metabolism in the Microsporidia

Members of the phylum Microspora are all obligate intracellular parasites. Little is known concerning metabolic pathways in these parasites, some of which pose serious problems in immunocompromised patients. We investigated polyamine metabolism in the systemic pathogen Enterocytozoon cuniculi using intact pre-emergent spores, and cell-free preparations. We found both polyamine synthetic and interconversion pathways to be operative, as evidenced by conversion of ornithine into polyamines, and production of spermidine from spermine by pre-emergent spores. Recent developments in the antitumour field have highlighted the ability of bis-ethylated polyamine analogues to reduce polyamine levels and block growth of tumour cells. In light of enhanced polyamine uptake in Enc. cuniculi, we have begun to study bis-aryl 3-7-3 and bis-ethyl oligoamine analogues as leads for chemotherapy of microsporidia.     

Parasitic systems of Microsporidia: descriptions and terminology questions

Three parasitic systems of Microsporidia are described: the system of monoxenic Vairimorpha mesnili with paraxenic hosts presented lepidopteran and hymenopteran species; the system of dixenic Amblyospora sp. with metaxenic hosts presented bloodsucking mosquitoes and crustaceans and the system of Metchnikovella sp. as parasite of other obligate parasite. The last case is characterized by very intimate interrelations between hyperparasite (microsporidian species), obligate parasite--host of Microsporidia (gregarine) and hyperhost--host of gregarine (polychaeta). This hyperparasite system is exclusive case of parasitic systems. Parasitic and hyperparasitic systems reflects a population level of host-parasite interactions. On biocenotic level many other organisms such as predators, vectors and reservators of invasion stages of Microsporidia affect parasitic systems giving a chance to one of the members of the system (to the host or to the parasite). These organisms form epiparasitic system. In all cases of the parasitic systems there are two-way communications between parasites and their hosts. In systems on biocenotic level--parasitic consortium--members of epiparasitic systems acts on parasitic systems, but members of parasitic systems don't affect epiparasitic systems.