Human rabies immunoglobulin assayed by the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test suppresses active rabies immunization

The rabies antibody content of each of ten lots of human rabies immunoglobulin was titrated by both the mouse neutralization test and the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. The two tests did not give comparable results, the antibody titres obtained by the mouse neutralization test being 1·4–9·6 times higher than those obtained by the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test. This titre difference was associated with a consistently lower antibody response in human volunteers who had received post-exposure rabies vaccine treatment which included the administration of RIG assayed by the RFFIT.     

The rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test is a suitable method for batch potency testing of inactivated rabies vaccines

The European Pharmacopoeia proposes two methods for potency determination of inactivated rabies vaccines for veterinary use: The first one is a classical mouse challenge test, which is imprecise, time-consuming, and causes severe distress to the test animals. Alternatively, the potency may be determined serologically by measuring the neutralizing antibody titers induced after vaccination of mice by using a rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT). Although this method is faster and less painful for the animals, it is not widely used yet, and only little data exist concerning the comparability of both methods.We have therefore performed a comparative study, in which we demonstrated a good correlation between the challenge test results and the mean titers determined by RFFIT. Furthermore, all vaccine batches failing the challenge test were also recognized as insufficient in the serological assay. This publication further describes the influence of different vaccine administration routes on the resulting antibody titers, and it proposes various modifications to the serological assay protocol which could improve its overall practicability. Finally, we recommend that the serological assay be used for the potency testing of inactivated rabies vaccines.     

Establishment and preliminary application of a rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT) for rabies virus

The World Health Organization (WHO) standard assay for determining levels of the rabies virus neutralization antibody (RVNA) is the rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT), which is used to evaluate the immunity effect after vaccination against rabies. For RFFIT, CVS-11 was used as the challenge virus, BSR cells as the adapted cells, and WHO rabies immunoglobulin (WHO STD) as the reference serum in this study. With reference to WHO and Pasteur RFFIT procedures, a micro-RFFIT procedure adapted to our laboratory was produced, and its specificity and reproducibility were tested. We tested levels of RVNA in human serum samples after immunization with different human rabies vaccines (domestic purified Vero cell rabies vaccine (PVRV) and imported purified chick embryo cell vaccine (PCECV)) using different regimens (Zagreb regimen and Essen regimen). We analyzed the levels of RVNA, and compared the immune efficacy of domestic PVRV and imported PCECV using different immunization regimens. The results showed that the immune efficacy of domestic PVRV using the Zagreb regimen was as good as that of the imported PCECV, but virus antibodies were generated more rapidly with the Zagreb regimen than with the Essen regimen. The RFFIT procedure established in our laboratory will enhance the comprehensive detection ability of institutions involved in rabies surveillance in China.     

Chicken embryo related (CER) cell line for quantification of rabies neutralizing antibody by fluorescent focus inhibition test.

Levels of rabies virus neutralization antibody in sera from vaccinated dogs and cattle were either measured by mouse neutralization test (MNT) or by rapid fluorescent focus inhibition test (RFFIT), performed on CER monolayers. The two tests were compared for their ability to detect the 0.5 International Units/ml (I.U.) recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) as the minimum response for proof of rabies immunization. A significant correlation was found between the two tests (n=211; r=0.9949 in dogs and 0.9307 in cows, p<0.001), good sensitivity (87.5%), specificity (94.7%) and agreement (96.6%) as well. RFFIT method standardized on CER cell system for neutralizing antibodies detection turns the diagnosis easier and less expensive, specially when a great number of samples must be tested from endemic areas as commonly found in Brazil.     

Comparison between the counter immunoelectrophoresis test and mouse neutralization test for the detection of antibodies against rabies virus in dog sera

The detection of rabies antibodies is extremely valuable for epidemiological studies, determination of immune status in man, animals, and for the diagnosis of the disease. Several serological procedures have been described for this purpose. The present study reports a comparison between counterimmunoelectrophoresis test (CIET) and mouse neutralization test (MNT) in the detection of antibodies against rabies virus from 212 serum samples of vaccinated dogs. The agreement between both techniques was 79.7% and a significative association was demonstrated. The correlation coefficients between MNT and the CIET titers was determined considering 88 samples showing positive results in both techniques [CIET = 2 and MNT = 5 (0.13 IU/ml)] and resulted r2 = 0.7926 (p < 0.001). The performance of CIET system was technically simple, cheap and rapid, and thereby it could be useful for serological monitoring of dog vaccination campaigns as well as for individual analysis.     

A comparison of the indirect haemagglutination test with the toxin neutralization test for the estimation of diphtheria antitoxin in mouse sera

Serum samples from 42 groups of mice immunized for different immunization periods with various doses of Adsorbed Diphtheria-Tetanus Vaccine, Adsorbed Diphtheria-Tetanus and Pertussis Vaccine and a standard diphtheria toxoid were assayed for their diphtheria antitoxin content by indirect haemagglutination (IHA) and by toxin neutralization (TN) tests. A very good correlation of 0.91 was obtained between the results of the two methods. There was no statistically significant difference between the IHA and the TN titres obtained. Adsorption with sheep red cells and treatment of the sera with 2-mercaptoethanol had no effect on the IHA titres. The minimum level of antitoxin detectable by the IHA test was 0.00039 IU ml-1. IHA proved to be a sensitive, specific and reproducible method which can be used reliably for the assay of diphtheria antitoxin in mouse sera.     

Methods of using the antibody neutralization test in intestinal coli-infections]

Specificity and sensitivity of the antibody neutralization test intended for detection of the O-antigen of enteropathogenic escherichia were checked under experimental conditions. Only 3 strains of the Klebsiella genus proved to neutralize the antibodies to the enteropathogenic escherichia of the serological group O20:K84. In the rest of the cases a positive result was obtained only in homologous combinations. In comparative study of the microbial cultures of the infected feces on hard nutrient media by means of bacteriological and serological methods the latter was found to be more sensitive, capable of detecting the homologous O-antigen with the bacterial concentration of not less than 5-10(5) microbial cells per 1 ml.     

Malaria seroepidemiology: comparison between indirect fluorescent antibody test and enzyme immunoassay using bloodspot eluates.

Blood sampling on filter paper is a current practice in malaria seroepidemiological studies by indirect fluorescent antibody test (IFAT). There is, however, scant comparative information about the use of bloodspot eluates for detection of malarial IgG antibodies simultaneously by IFAT and enzyme immunoassay (ELISA). Here we report data obtained by both serological methods done on 219 bloodspot eluate samples collected in a rural community in Brazilian Amazon Basin (Alto Paraíso, Ariquemes municipality) where malaria is endemic. Plasmodium falciparum and P. vivax thick smear antigens were used in the IFAT; a detergent-soluble P. falciparum antigen was prepared for ELISA. Substantial agreement of results (Kappa coefficient k = 0.686) was observed when P. falciparum antigen was used in both tests, and IFAT titers were found to be strongly correlated to ELISA antibody units (Spearman correlation coefficient rs = 0.818, p < 0.001). Only moderate agreement (k = 0.467) between IFAT with P. vivax antigen and ELISA with P. falciparum antigen was observed. Spearman correlation coefficient value between quantitative results (IFAT titers and ELISA antibody units) in this case was numerically lower (rs = 0.540, p < 0.0001). Our results suggest that, with P. falciparum antigen, both IFAT and ELISA performed on bloodspot eluates are equivalent for seroepidemiological purposes.