Interactions between thrombospondin and the small proteoglycan decorin: interference with cell attachment.

Decorin, a ubiquitous small interstitial dermatan sulfate proteoglycan, interacts with several extracellular matrix components, e.g., with type I collagen and fibronectin. Using a solid phase assay it is shown that the intact proteoglycan as well as its glycosaminoglycan-free core protein exhibits with KD values of about 5 nM and 2 nM, respectively, high affinity binding also to thrombospondin. However, the polysaccharide chain was required for an interaction with Sepharose-bound thrombospondin and served itself as ligand. In light of the results of binding studies with an N-terminal heparin-binding fragment of thrombospondin it is concluded that several structural features of thrombospondin and of decorin contribute to the mutual interaction of the two macromolecules. Thrombospondin substrata allowed attachment but prevented spreading of human skin fibroblasts. The addition of decorin or of its glycosaminoglycan-free core protein led to a considerable delay of cell attachment on a thrombospondin substrate. The strength of cell attachment appeared to be reduced. These data support the antiadhesive role of decorin regardless of whether subsequent cell spreading is supported or not.     

Transforming growth factor-β and p-21: multiple molecular targets of decorin-mediated suppression of neoplastic growth

Decorin is a member of the small leucine-rich proteoglycan (SLRP) gene family that has recently become a focus in various areas of cancer research. The decorin protein consists of a core protein and a covalently linked glycosaminoglycan chain. Decorin binds to collagens type I, II and IV in vivo and promotes the formation of fibers with increased stability and changes in solubility. Further, the decorin core protein binds to growth factors, including transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta), to other intercellular matrix molecules such as fibronectin and thrombospondin, and to the decorin endocytosis receptor. Decorin may directly interfere with the cell cycle via the induction of p21WAF1/CIP1 (p21), a potent inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs). Here, we discuss interactions of decorin with TGF-beta and with p21, both of which are relevant to carcinogenesis and tumor progression. TGF-beta is released by tumors of various histogenetic origins and promotes immunosuppression in the host and tumor immune escape by induction of growth arrest and apoptosis in immune cells, by downregulation of MHC II antigen expression and by changes in the cytokine release profiles of immune and tumor cells. Moreover, TGF-beta may modulate tumor growth in an autocrine and paracrine fashion, may mediate drug resistance, and may facilitate tumor angiogenesis. Decorin binds to TGF-beta, thus inhibiting its bioactivity, and is a direct or indirect negative modulator of TGF-beta synthesis. Ectopic expression of decorin results in the regression of rat C6 gliomas, an antineoplastic effect attributed to the reversal of TGF-beta-induced immunosuppression. On the other hand, de novo expression of decorin in colon cancer cells and some other tumor cells, even though not in glioma cells, results in an upregulation of p21 expression and a cell cycle arrest, presumably in a TGF-beta-independent manner. Decorin expression is downregulated in many tumors but upregulated in the peritumoral stroma. By virtue of its growth regulatory and immunomodulatory properties, decorin promises to become a novel target for the experimental therapy of human cancers.     

The core protein of the matrix-associated heparan sulfate proteoglycan binds to fibronectin

The extracellular matrix of cultured human lung fibroblasts contains one major heparan sulfate proteoglycan. This proteoglycan contains a 400-kDa core protein and is structurally and immunochemically identical or closely related to the heparan sulfate proteoglycans that occur in basement membranes. Because heparitinase does not release the core protein from the matrix of cultured cells, we investigated the binding interactions of this heparan sulfate proteoglycan with other components of the fibroblast extracellular matrix. Both the intact proteoglycan and the heparitinase-resistant core protein were found to bind to fibronectin. The binding of 125I-labeled core protein to immobilized fibronectin was inhibited by soluble fibronectin and by soluble cold core protein but not by albumin or gelatin. A Scatchard plot indicates a Kd of about 2 x 10(-9) M. Binding of the core protein was also inhibited by high concentrations of heparin, heparan sulfate, or chrondroitin sulfate and was sensitive to high salt concentrations. Thermolysin fragmentation of the 125I-labeled proteoglycan yielded glycosamino-glycan-free core protein fragments of approximately 110 and 62 kDa which bound to both fibronectin and heparin columns. The core protein-binding capacity of fibronectin was very sensitive to proteolysis. Analysis of thermolytic and alpha-chymotryptic fragments of fibronectin showed binding of the intact proteoglycan and of its isolated core protein to a protease-sensitive fragment of 56 kDa which carried the gelatin-binding domain of fibronectin and to a protease-sensitive heparin-binding fragment of 140 kDa. Based on the NH2-terminal amino acid sequence analyses of the 56- and 140-kDa fragments, the core protein-binding domain in fibronectin was tentatively mapped in the area of overlap of the two fragments, carboxyl-terminally from the gelatin-binding domain, possibly in the second type III repeat of fibronectin. These data document a specific and high affinity interaction between fibronectin and the core protein of the matrix heparan sulfate proteoglycan which may anchor the proteoglycan in the matrix.     

Decorin and biglycan expression: its relation with endothelial heterogeneity

Decorin and biglycan proteoglycans play important roles in the organization of the extracellular matrix, and in the regulation of cell adhesion and migration. Given morphological and functional endothelial heterogeneity, information is needed regarding whether endothelial cells (ECs) from different vascular beds possess different profiles of proteoglycan constituents of the basement membranes. Here, we report that endothelia from different murine organs and EC lines derived thereof produce and secrete different patterns of proteoglycans. A faint colocalization between decorin and PECAM/CD31 was found on tissue sections from mouse heart, lung and kidney by immunofluorescence. Three EC lines derived from these organs produced decorin (100-kDa) and its core protein (45-kDa). Extracellular decorin recognition in culture supernatant was only possible after chondroitin lyase digestion suggesting that the core protein of secreted proteoglycan is more encrypted by glycosaminoglycans than the intracellular one. Heart and lung ECs were able to produce and release decorin. Kidney ECs synthesized the proteoglycan and its core protein but no secretion was detected in culture supernatants. Although biglycan production was recorded in all EC lines, secretion was almost undetectable, consistent with immunofluorescence results. In addition, no biglycan secretion was detected after EC growth supplement treatment, indicating that biglycan is synthesized, secreted and quickly degraded extracellularly by metalloproteinase-2. Low molecular-mass dermatan sulfate was the predominant glycosaminoglycan identified bound to the core protein. ECs from different vascular beds, with differences in morphology, physiology and cell biology show differences in the proteoglycan profile, extending their heterogeneity to potential differences in cell migration capacities.     

Decorin inhibits cell migration through a process requiring its glycosaminoglycan side chain.

Several studies overwhelmingly support the notion that decorin (DCN) is involved in matrix assembly, and in the control of cell adhesion and proliferation. However, nothing is known about the role of DCN during cell migration. Cell migration is a tightly regulated process which requires both adhesion (at the leading edge of the cell) and de-adhesion (at the trailing edge of the cell) from the substratum. We have determined in this study the effect of DCN on MG-63 osteosarcoma cell migration and have analyzed whether its effect is mediated by the protein core and/or the glycosaminoglycan side chain. DCN impeded the migration-promoting effect of matrix molecules (fibronectin, collagen type I) known to interact with the proteoglycan. Conversely, DCN did not counteract the migration-promoting effect of fibrinogen lacking proteoglycan affinity. DCN bearing dermatan-sulfate chains (i.e., skin and cartilage DCN) was about 20-fold more effective in inhibiting cell migration than DCN bearing chondroitin-sulfate chains (i.e., bone DCN). In addition, chondroitinase AC-treatment of cartilage DCN (which specifically removes chondroitin-sulfate chains) did not attenuate the inhibitory effect of this proteoglycan, while cartilage DCN deprived of both chondroitin- and dermatan-sulfate chains failed to alter cell migration promoted by either fibronectin or its heparin- and cell-binding domains. These data assert that the dermatan-sulfate chains of DCN are responsible for a negative influence on cell migration. However, isolated glycosaminoglycans failed to alter cell migration promoted by fibronectin, indicating that strongly negatively charged glycosaminoglycans alone cannot account for the impaired cell motility seen with DCN. Overall, these results show that the inhibitory action of DCN is dependent of substratum binding, is differentially mediated by its glycosaminoglycan side chains (chondroitin-sulfate vs. dermatan-sulfate chains), and is independent of a steric hindrance effect exerted by its glycosaminoglycan side chains.     

Retrovirally mediated expression of decorin by macrovascular endothelial cells. Effects on cellular migration and fibronectin fibrillogenesis in vitro

Decorin is a member of the widely expressed family of small leucine-rich proteoglycans. In addition to a primary role as a modulator of extracellular matrix protein fibrillogenesis, decorin can inhibit the cellular response to growth factors. Decorin expression is induced in endothelial cells during angiogenesis, but not when migration and proliferation are stimulated. Thus, decorin may support the formation of the fibrillar pericellular matrix that stabilizes the differentiated endothelial phenotype during the later stages of angiogenesis. Therefore, we tested whether constitutive decorin expression alone could modify endothelial cell migration and proliferation or affect pericellular matrix formation. To this end, replication-defective retroviral vectors were used to stably express bovine decorin, which was detected by Northern and Western blotting. The migration of endothelial cells that express decorin is significantly inhibited in both monolayer outgrowth and microchemotaxis chamber assays. The inhibition of cell migration by decorin was not accompanied by decreased proliferation. In addition, endothelial cells that express decorin assemble an extensive fibrillar fibronectin matrix more rapidly than control cells as assessed by immunocytochemical and fibronectin fibrillogenesis assays. These observations suggest that cell migration may be modulated by the influence of decorin on the assembly of the cell-associated extracellular matrix.     

Decorin, a novel player in the insulin-like growth factor system

Decorin is a multifunctional proteoglycan that is expressed by sprouting endothelial cells. Its expression supports capillary formation and cell survival. Previously, it was shown that some effects of decorin are mediated by protein kinase B and the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21. However, the cell surface receptor responsible for these effects was unknown. We demonstrate that decorin binds to the insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor on endothelial cells with an affinity in the nanomolar range (K(D) = 18 nm), which is comparable with IGF-I (K(D) = 1.2 nm). Furthermore, decorin can bind IGF-I itself, but with a lower affinity (K(D) = 190 nm) than classical IGF-I-binding proteins. Decorin addition causes IGF-I receptor phosphorylation and activation, which is followed by receptor down-regulation. These effects are caused by the core protein of decorin, and the binding region could be mapped to the N terminus of the molecule. The physiological relevance of the decorin/IGF-I receptor interaction was corroborated in two animal models (e.g. inflammatory angiogenesis in the cornea and unilateral ureteral obstruction). In both models the IGF-I receptor was up-regulated in decorin-deficient mice compared with controls and the up-regulation could not compensate the decorin deficiency in the disease models. These data indicate that decorin is an important player in the IGF system and its loss cannot fully be compensated in different types of diseases.     

Structural correlations in the family of small leucine-rich repeat proteins and proteoglycans

The family of small leucine-rich repeat proteins and proteoglycans (SLRPs) contains several extracellular matrix molecules that are structurally related by a protein core composed of leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) flanked by two conserved cysteine-rich regions. The small proteoglycan decorin is the archetypal SLRP. Decorin is present in a variety of connective tissues, typically "decorating" collagen fibrils, and is involved in important biological functions, including the regulation of the assembly of fibrillar collagens and modulation of cell adhesion. Several SLRPs are known to regulate collagen fibrillogenesis and there is evidence that they may share other biological functions. We have recently determined the crystal structure of the protein core of decorin, the first such determination of a member of the SLRP family. This structure has highlighted several correlations: (1) SLRPs have similar internal repeat structures; (2) SLRP molecules are far less curved than an early model of decorin based on the three-dimensional structure of ribonuclease inhibitor; (3) the N-terminal and C-terminal cysteine-rich regions are conserved capping motifs. Furthermore, the structure shows that decorin dimerizes through the concave surface of its LRR domain, which has been implicated previously in its interaction with collagen. We have established that both decorin and opticin, another SLRP, form stable dimers in solution. Conservation of residues involved in decorin dimerization suggests that the mode of dimerization for other SLRPs will be similar. Taken together these results suggest the need for reevaluation of currently accepted models of SLRP interaction with their ligands.     

Endocytosis of different members of the small chondroitin/dermatan sulfate proteoglycan family.

The family of small interstitial chondroitin/dermatan sulfate proteoglycans consists of at least three different molecular species: biglycan (proteoglycan I), decorin (proteoglycan II), and proteoglycan-100, which has a glycosylated core protein of about 100 kDa. The core protein of decorin has been shown to be responsible for receptor-mediated endocytosis of this proteoglycan species by a variety of mesenchymal cells. It is now demonstrated that skin fibroblasts and articular chondrocytes endocytose biglycan with an efficiency similar to that of decorin. Uptake of biglycan is also mediated by its core protein and can be inhibited by decorin in a partially competitive manner. In human fibroblasts, endosomal proteins of 51 and 26 kDa, which are known to bind decorin core protein, also interact with biglycan. This interaction can be inhibited by decorin. Bovine articular chondrocytes contained binding proteins of 48 and 25 kDa. Proteoglycan-100 can be distinguished from biglycan and decorin by its low clearance rate, which however, exceeds the rate of fluid phase endocytosis.     

Perlecan inhibits smooth muscle cell adhesion to fibronectin: role of heparan sulfate

Smooth muscle cell migration, proliferation, and deposition of extracellular matrix are key events in atherogenesis and restenosis development. To explore the mechanisms that regulate smooth muscle cell function, we have investigated whether perlecan, a basement membrane heparan sulfate proteoglycan, modulates interaction between smooth muscle cells and other matrix components. A combined substrate of fibronectin and perlecan showed a reduced adhesion of rat aortic smooth muscle cells by 70-90% in comparison to fibronectin alone. In contrast, perlecan did not interfere with cell adhesion to laminin. Heparinase treated perlecan lost 60% of its anti-adhesive effect. Furthermore, heparan sulfate as well as heparin reduced smooth muscle cell adhesion when combined with fibronectin whereas neither hyaluronan nor chondroitin sulfate had any anti-adhesive effects. Addition of heparin as a second coating to a preformed fibronectin matrix did not affect cell adhesion. Cell adhesion to the 105- and 120 kDa cell-binding fragments of fibronectin, lacking the main heparin-binding domains, was also inhibited by heparin. In addition, co-coating of fibronectin and (3)H-heparin showed that heparin was not even incorporated in the substrate. Morphologically, smooth muscle cells adhering to a substrate prepared by co-coating of fibronectin and perlecan or heparin were small, rounded, lacked focal contacts, and showed poorly developed stress fibers of actin. The results show that the heparan sulfate chains of perlecan lead to altered interactions between smooth muscle cells and fibronectin, possibly due to conformational changes in the fibronectin molecule. Such interactions may influence smooth muscle cell function in atherogenesis and vascular repair processes.     

Binding of heparin and of the small proteoglycan decorin to the same endocytosis receptor proteins leads to different metabolic consequences

Decorin, a small interstitial dermatan sulfate proteoglycan, is turned over in cultured cells of mesenchymal origin by receptor-mediated endocytosis followed by intralysosomal degradation. Two endosomal proteins of 51 and 26 kD have been implicated in the endocytotic process because of their interaction with decorin core protein. However, heparin and protein-free dermatan sulfate were able to inhibit endocytosis of decorin in a concentration-dependent manner. After Western blotting of endosomal proteins, there was competition for binding to the 51- and 26-kD proteins between heparin and decorin. In spite of its high-affinity binding, heparin was poorly cleared from the medium of cultured cells and then catabolized in lysosomes. In contrast to decorin, binding of heparin to the 51- and 26-kD proteins was insensitive to acidic pH, thus presumably preventing its dissociation from the receptor in the endosome. Recycling of heparin to the cell surface after internalization could indeed be demonstrated.     

Defective Glycosaminoglycan Substitution of Decorin in a Patient With Progeroid Syndrome Is a Direct Consequence of Two Point Mutations in the Galactosyltransferase I (ß4galT-7) Gene

The small dermatan sulfate proteoglycan decorin is involved in the regulation of collagen fibrillogenesis, cell adhesion and migration, and growth factor signaling. In a progeroid patient carrying two point mutations in ß4galactosyltransferase I (ß4galT-7) only 50% of the decorin core protein molecules are substituted with glycosaminoglycan chains. We expressed decorin, as well as wild-type and mutant alleles of ß4galT-7 in galactosyltransferase-deficient CHO618 cells. Decorin was less efficiently substituted with glycosaminoglycan chains upon expression of ß4galT-7^186D compared to ß4galT-7-expressing cells. Decorin from ß4galT-7-expressing cells displayed increased molecular heterogeneity. Decorin glycosaminoglycan chains were completely susceptible to chondroitinase ABC treatment. Cells expressing ß4galT-7^206P did not synthesize the proteoglycan form of decorin. Thus, the ß4galT-7 mutations directly affect the molecular phenotype of decorin observed in a patient with the progeroid form of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, which may be a major mechanistic cause for the skin and wound healing defects observed in this patient.     

Adhesion and cytoskeletal organisation of fibroblasts in response to fibronectin fragments.

Fibronectin has been shown previously to promote complete cell adhesion in the absence of other serum components or de novo protein synthesis. Recently a sequence of four amino acids from the cell-binding domain of fibronectin has been termed the 'cell recognition site' of this multidomain molecule since it mediates cell attachment and inhibits cell adhesion to intact fibronectin. We show here, however, that substrata coated with an isolated cell-binding domain of fibronectin are not sufficient for complete cell adhesion; cells attach and spread but, unlike those adhering to intact fibronectin, they do not form stress fibres terminating in focal adhesions. An additional external stimulus is needed for this cytoskeletal reorganisation and may be provided by one of two heparin-binding fragments of fibronectin. The two 'signals' required for complete adhesion need not be provided simultaneously since focal adhesion formation can be promoted by stimulating cells pre-spread on a cell-binding fragment of fibronectin with a soluble heparin-binding fragment. This second stimulation may involve cell membrane heparan sulphate proteoglycans.     

Molecular interactions between fibronectin and integrins during mouse blastocyst outgrowth

To investigate the mechanism of trophoblast adhesion to fibronectin, we cultured blastocysts in serum-free medium on proteolytic fibronectin fragments containing its major functional domains, and localized fibronectin-binding integrins in outgrowing trophoblast cells by immunofluorescent staining. Outgrowth comparable to that obtained with intact fibronectin was observed using a 120 kD chymotryptic fragment containing the central cell-binding domain (FN-120) and the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) recognition sequence. A 40 kD COOH-terminal chymotryptic fragment of fibronectin containing both a heparin-binding region and an alternate (non-RGD) cell-binding site was inactive in supporting trophoblast adhesion. Three synthetic peptides derived from the heparin-binding domain, including the CS1 alternate cell-binding site, were also unable to promote trophoblast cell adhesion. A 75 kD recombinant protein, ProNectin F, containing 13 copies of the cell recognition epitope of fibronectin, Val-Thr-Gly-Arg-Gly-Asp-Ser-Pro-Ala-Ser, vigorously supported blastocyst outgrowth. Blastocyst outgrowth was not significantly different when surfaces were precoated with cellular fibronectin, which contains an alternatively spliced type III repeat and is the form actually encountered in vivo. Several putative fibronectin receptors were localized in trophoblast outgrowths by immunofluorescent labeling. Antibodies reactive with integrin subunits α3, α5, αllb, αv, β1 and β3, but not α4, all bound to trophoblast cells. Antibodies raised against either the β1 or β3 integrin subunits significantly inhibited fibronectin-mediated outgrowth. These findings demonstrate the key role of the central cell-binding domain of fibronectin in trophoblast adhesion, and suggest four RGD-binding integrins, α3β1, α5β1, αllbβ3, and αvβ3, that could mediate trophoblast adhesion in vitro and may play an important role during implantation. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Distinct secondary structures of the leucine-rich repeat proteoglycans decorin and biglycan. Glycosylation-dependent conformational stability

Biglycan and decorin have been overexpressed in eukaryotic cells and two major glycoforms isolated under native conditions: a proteoglycan substituted with glycosaminoglycan chains; and a core protein form secreted devoid of glycosaminoglycans (Hocking, A. M., Strugnell, R. A., Ramamurthy, P., and McQuillan, D. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19571-19577; Ramamurthy, P., Hocking, A. M., and McQuillan, D. J. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 19578-19584). Far-UV CD spectroscopy of decorin and biglycan proteoglycans indicates that, although they are predominantly beta-sheet, biglycan has a significantly higher content of alpha-helical structure. Decorin proteoglycan and core protein are very similar, whereas the biglycan core protein exhibits closer similarity to the decorin glycoforms than to the biglycan proteoglycan form. However, enzymatic removal of the chondroitin sulfate chains from biglycan proteoglycan does not induce a shift to the core protein structure, suggesting that the final form is influenced by polysaccharide addition only during biosynthesis. Fluorescence emission spectroscopy demonstrated that the single tryptophan residue, which is at a conserved position at the C-terminal domain of both biglycan and decorin, is found in similar microenvironments. This indicates that in this specific domain the different glycoforms do exhibit apparent conservation of structure. Exposure of decorin and biglycan to 10 M urea resulted in an increase in fluorescent intensity, which indicates that the emission from tryptophan in the native state is quenched. Comparison of urea-induced protein unfolding curves provide further evidence that decorin and biglycan assume different structures in solution. Decorin proteoglycan and core protein unfold in a manner similar to a classic two-state model, in which there is a steep transition to an unfolded state between 1 and 2 M urea. The biglycan core protein also shows a similar steep transition. However, biglycan proteoglycan shows a broad unfolding transition between 1 and 6 M urea, probably indicating the presence of stable unfolding intermediates.     

Decorin binds to a narrow region of the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor,partially overlapping but distinct from the EGF-binding epitope

Decorin, a small leucine-rich proteoglycan, is a key regulator of tumor growth by acting as an antagonist of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase. To search for cell surface receptors interacting with decorin, we generated a decorin/alkaline phosphatase chimeric protein and used it to screen a cDNA library by expression cloning. We identified two strongly reactive clones that encoded either the full-length EGFR or its ectodomain. A physiologically relevant interaction between decorin and EGFR was confirmed in the yeast two-hybrid system and further validated by experiments using EGF/EGFR interaction and transient cell transfection assays. Using a panel of deletion mutants, decorin binding was mapped to a narrow region of the EGFR within its ligand-binding L2 domain. Moreover, the central leucine-rich repeat 6 of decorin was required for interaction with the EGFR. Site-directed mutagenesis of the EGFR L2 domain showed that a cluster of residues, His(394)-Ile(402), was essential for both decorin and EGF binding. In contrast, K465, previously shown to be cross-linked to epidermal growth factor (EGF), was required for EGF but not for decorin binding. Thus, decorin binds to a discrete region of the EGFR, partially overlapping with but distinct from the EGF-binding domain. These findings could lead to the generation of protein mimetics capable of suppressing EGFR function.     

Effects of rhDecorin on TGF-beta1 induced human hepatic stellate cells LX-2 activation

Decorin is a small leucine-rich extracellular matrix proteoglycan composed of a core protein with a single glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chain near the N-terminus and N-glycosylated at three potential sites. Decorin is involved in the regulation of formation and organization of collagen fibrils, modulation of the activity of growth factors such as transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta), and exerts other effects on cell proliferation and behavior. Increasing evidences show that decorin plays an important role in fibrogenesis by regulating TGF-beta, a key stimulator of fibrosis, and by directly modulating the degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) from activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). In this study, the core protein of human decorin was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. The purified recombinant human decorin (rhDecorin) significantly inhibited the proliferation of LX-2 cells, a human HSC cell line, stimulated by TGF-beta1. RT-PCR result showed that the expression of metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) were reduced by rhDecorin in LX-2 cells stimulated by TGF-beta1. Furthermore, the protein expression of smooth muscle-alpha-actin (alpha-SMA), collagen type III and phosphorylated Smad2 (p-Smad2) was significantly decreased in the presence of rhDecorin. rhDecorin also reduced fibrillogenesis of collagen type I in a dose-dependent manner. Gene expression profiles of LX-2 cells stimulated by TGF-beta1 in the presence and the absence of rhDecorin were obtained by using cDNA microarray technique and differentially expressed genes were identified to provide further insight into the molecular action mechanism of decorin on LX-2 cells.     

Decorin binds myostatin and modulates its activity to muscle cells

Myostatin, a member of TGF-beta superfamily of growth factors, acts as a negative regulator of skeletal muscle mass. The mechanism whereby myostatin controls the proliferation and differentiation of myogenic cells is mostly clarified. However, the regulation of myostatin activity to myogenic cells after its secretion in the extracellular matrix (ECM) is still unknown. Decorin, a small leucine-rich proteoglycan, binds TGF-beta and regulates its activity in the ECM. Thus, we hypothesized that decorin could also bind to myostatin and participate in modulation of its activity to myogenic cells. In order to test the hypothesis, we investigated the interaction between myostatin and decorin by surface plasmon assay. Decorin interacted with mature myostatin in the presence of concentrations of Zn(2+) greater than 10microM, but not in the absence of Zn(2+). Kinetic analysis with a 1:1 binding model resulted in dissociation constants (K(D)) of 2.02x10(-8)M and 9.36x10(-9)M for decorin and the core protein of decorin, respectively. Removal of the glycosaminoglycan chain by chondroitinase ABC digestion did not affect binding, suggesting that decorin could bind to myostatin with its core protein. Furthermore, we demonstrated that immobilized decorin could rescue the inhibitory effect of myostatin on myoblast proliferation in vitro. These results suggest that decorin could trap myostatin and modulate its activity to myogenic cells in the ECM.     

Effects of rhDecorin on TGF-β1 induced human hepatic stellate cells LX-2 activation

Decorin is a small leucine-rich extracellular matrix proteoglycan composed of a core protein with a single glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chain near the N-terminus and N-glycosylated at three potential sites. Decorin is involved in the regulation of formation and organization of collagen fibrils, modulation of the activity of growth factors such as transforming growth factor β (TGF-β), and exerts other effects on cell proliferation and behavior. Increasing evidences show that decorin plays an important role in fibrogenesis by regulating TGF-β, a key stimulator of fibrosis, and by directly modulating the degradation of extracellular matrix (ECM) from activated hepatic stellate cells (HSCs). In this study, the core protein of human decorin was cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. The purified recombinant human decorin (rhDecorin) significantly inhibited the proliferation of LX-2 cells, a human HSC cell line, stimulated by TGF-β1. RT-PCR result showed that the expression of metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) were reduced by rhDecorin in LX-2 cells stimulated by TGF-β1. Furthermore, the protein expression of smooth muscle-α-actin (α-SMA), collagen type III and phosphorylated Smad2 (p-Smad2) was significantly decreased in the presence of rhDecorin. rhDecorin also reduced fibrillogenesis of collagen type I in a dose-dependent manner. Gene expression profiles of LX-2 cells stimulated by TGF-β1 in the presence and the absence of rhDecorin were obtained by using cDNA microarray technique and differentially expressed genes were identified to provide further insight into the molecular action mechanism of decorin on LX-2 cells.     

Decorin core protein secretion is regulated by N-linked oligosaccharide and glycosaminoglycan additions

Expression of decorin using the vaccinia virus/T7 expression system resulted in secretion of two distinct glycoforms: a proteoglycan substituted with a single chondroitin sulfate chain and N-linked oligosaccharides and a core protein glycoform substituted with N-linked glycans but without a glycosaminoglycan chain. In this report, we have addressed two distinct questions. What is the rate-limiting step in glycosaminoglycan synthesis? Is glycosylation with either N-linked oligosaccharides or glycosaminoglycan required for secretion of decorin? N-terminal sequencing of the core protein glycoform, the addition of benzyl-beta-d-xyloside, and a UDP-xylose: core protein beta-d-xylosyltransferase activity assay show that xylosylation is a rate-limiting step in chondroitin sulfate biosynthesis. Decorin can be efficiently secreted with N-linked oligosaccharides alone or with a single chondroitin sulfate chain alone; however, there is severely impaired secretion of core protein devoid of any glycosylation. A decorin core protein mutant devoid of N-linked oligosaccharide attachment sites will not be secreted by Chinese hamster ovary cells deficient in xylosyltransferase or by parental Chinese hamster ovary wild type cells if the xylosyltransferase recognition sequence is disrupted. This finding suggests that quality control mechanisms sensitive to an absence of N-linked oligosaccharides can be abrogated by interaction of the core protein with the glycosaminoglycan synthetic machinery. We propose a model of regulation of decorin secretion that has several components, including appropriate substitution with N-linked oligosaccharides and factors involved in glycosaminoglycan synthesis.