A Randomized Controlled Trial: Efficacy and Safety of Azithromycin,Ofloxacin, Bismuth,and Omeprazole Compared With Amoxicillin,Clarithromycin, Bismuth,and Omeprazole as Second‐Line Therapy in Patients With Helicobacter pylori Infection

Background: Helicobacter pylori infection of the stomach is widespread among human populations and is considered to play a major role in the pathogenesis of various diseases such as peptic ulcer, adenocarcinoma, and mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the stomach. To increase H. pylori eradication rate without increasing bacterial resistance, various regimens have been recommended. Commonly the association of at least two antibiotics with a proton‐pump inhibitor is used. The treatment regimens for second‐line therapy, suggested in studies from the western world may not be ideal in Iran. Aim: In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a new quadruple therapy regimen and compared it with the standard second‐line treatment for H. pylori eradication. Methods: We selected 220 H. pylori positive patients, with a clear indication of eradication therapy, who did not respond to a 2 weeks treatment with metronidazole, amoxicillin, omeprazole, and bismuth. They were randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 110) were treated with azithromycin, ofloxacin, bismuth, and omeprazole and group B (n = 110) with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, bismuth, and omeprazole for 2 weeks. Four weeks after the end of treatment, urea breath test was performed for all subjects to confirm eradication. Results: In intention‐to‐treat analysis, the rate of H. pylori eradication in groups A and B was 77.3% (85/110) and 64.5% (71/110) respectively (p = .027). In per‐protocol analysis, the rate of H. pylori eradication in groups A and B was 86.7 and 74.7%, respectively (p = .026). The incidence of poor compliance was lower, although not significantly so, in group A than group B (3.5 vs 4.3%). No major adverse events occurred in both groups. Conclusion: Two weeks of treatment with ofloxacin, azithromycin, omeprazole, and bismuth is an effective and safe regimen for H. pylori eradication as second‐line therapy.     

Effect of Smoking and Histological Gastritis Severity on the Rate of H. pylori Eradication with Omeprazole, Amoxicillin, and Clarithromycin

Background. The combination of omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is a common regimen against Helicobacter pylori. Several recent studies have shown that smoking, high intragastric acidity, and the degree of histological gastritis are associated with H. pylori eradication failure.
Materials and Methods. One hundred and thirty-seven H. pylori –positive patients were treated with a 1-week regimen composed of omeprazole, 20 mg once daily; amoxicillin, 500 mg; and clarithromycin, 200 mg thrice daily. Success of the treatment was evaluated by histology and the ¹³C-urea breath test at least 4 weeks after completion of therapy. Data about age, gender, alcohol intake, smoking habits, and previous proton pump inhibitor intake were collected in patient interviews. We evaluated fasting gastric pH and the degree of histological gastritis before eradication of H. pylori.
Results. The overall eradication of H. pylori at 4 weeks was successful in 98 of 137 patients (72%). On the multivariate analysis, a low grade of inflammation in the antrum ( p ≤ .01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.34–16.75), low grade of activity in the fundus ( p ≤ .05; 95% CI, 1.31–9.65), and smoking ( p ≤ .05; 95% CI, 1.27–6.82) were the significant independent factors predicting treatment failure.
Conclusions. These findings indicate that H. pylori eradication therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is less effective in patients who smoke and more effective in patients with high scores of antral inflammation and fundal activity at baseline biopsy.     

Impact of Quadruple Regimen of Clarithromycin Added to Metronidazole-Containing Triple Therapy Against Helicobacter pylori Infection Following Clarithromycin-Containing Triple-Therapy Failure

Background: The establishment of an optimal second-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection is required. Although quadruple therapy should overcome resistance to either clarithromycin or metronidazole, the effects of a quadruple regimen in second-line therapy are unknown. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of triple therapy composed of proton pump inhibitor/amoxicillin plus metronidazole with the combined additive effects of clarithromycin as a second-line quadruple therapy against H. pylori infection.
Materials and Methods: Participants were 104 patients in whom first-line therapy containing proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin failed. Before starting second-line therapy, patients underwent endoscopy to obtain H. pylori strain for antibiotic susceptibility tests. Patients were randomized to receive rabeprazole (10 mg), amoxicillin (750 mg), and metronidazole (250 mg), either with clarithromycin (200 mg; RAMC group) or without (RAM group); all treatments were administered twice daily for 7 days. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by ¹³C-urea breath tests performed 2 to 3 months post-therapy.
Results: As shown by intention-to-treat/per-protocol analyses, the cure rates for H. pylori infection were 88.5%/93.9% and 82.7%/84.3% for the RAMC and RAM groups. Although the study probably had an insufficient power to show a significant difference between the cure rates of the two regimens, the eradication rates showed a clear trend in favor of the RAMC group. There were no severe side-effects in any group.
Conclusions: In Japan, the RAMC regimen is thought to be a promising alternative strategy for second-line eradication of H. pylori infection.     

Lafutidine versus Lansoprazole in Combination with Clarithromycin and Amoxicillin for One versus Two Weeks for Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Korea

Background and Aims: Lafutidine is a novel H₂‐receptor antagonist with gastroprotective activity that includes enhancement of gastric mucosal blood flow. The aim of the present study was to test the efficacy of 7‐ or 14‐day lafutidine–clarithromycin–amoxicillin therapy versus a lansoprazole‐based regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Methods: Four hundred and sixty‐three patients with H. pylori‐infected peptic ulcer disease were randomized to one of four regimens: (1) lafutidine (20 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.) and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 7 days (the 7LFT group) or (2) for 14 days (the 14LFT group); (3) lansoprazole (30 mg b.i.d.), clarithromycin (500 mg b.i.d.), and amoxicillin (1000 mg b.i.d.) for 7 days (the 7LPZ group); or (4) for 14 days (the 14LPZ group). The eradication rates, drug compliance, and adverse effects among the four regimens were compared. Results: The eradication rates by the intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses in the 7LFT and 7LPZ groups were 76.5% and 81.6%, and 76.9% and 82.0% (p = .94 and .95), respectively. The eradication rates by intention‐to‐treat and per‐protocol analyses in the 14LFT and 14LPZ groups were 78.2% and 82.2%, and 80.4% and 85.9% (p = .70 and .49), respectively. The treatment duration for 7 days or 14 days did not affect the eradication rates. In addition, the adverse effect rates and discontinuation rates were similar among the four groups. Furthermore, the ulcer cure rate and symptom response rate were similar in the lafutidine and lansoprazole groups. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that lafutidine–clarithromycin–amoxicillin therapy was a safe and effective as lansoprazole‐based triple therapy for the eradication rate of H. pylori, and could be considered as an additional treatment option.     

Effectiveness and safety of repeated quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori infection after failure of second-line quadruple therapy: repeated quadruple therapy as a third-line therapy

Backgrounds: Quadruple therapy using a proton‐pump inhibitor, bismuth, metronidazole, and tetracycline is a standard second‐line therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection, achieving an eradication rate of about 80% in Korea. A standard third‐line therapy is not currently established, although various protocols have been proposed. We performed this study to evaluate the effectiveness of a retrial with quadruple therapy before starting a third‐line treatment with new drugs. Materials and Methods: In 80 of 746 patients treated with a second‐line quadruple therapy at the Korea University Ansan Hospital between January 2002 and September 2010, treatment for H. pylori had failed, and 45 of these patients were eligible for this study. Eradication of H. pylori was assessed by repeated endoscopy or by the ¹³C‐urea breath test at least 4 weeks after therapy. The patients with treatment failure were treated again with quadruple regimen for 2 weeks and reevaluated for treatment effectiveness and safety. Results: The eradication rate with second‐line quadruple therapy was 86.9%. Of the 80 patients who failed treatment for H. pylori with the initial second‐line quadruple therapy, 64 patients were treated again with the same regimen. Of the 45 retreated patients in this study, three patients were lost to follow‐up and two complied poorly with medication. The eradication rate in the 40 patients retreated was 75.0% at per‐protocol analysis. Seventeen patients experienced mild adverse events. Conclusions: A retrial of quadruple therapy before use of a third‐line therapy may be safe and effective for patients who fail to respond to second‐line quadruple therapy.     

阿莫西林、雷贝拉唑联合克拉霉素治疗Hp 相关消化性溃疡的疗效

目的：探讨阿莫西林、雷贝拉唑联合克拉霉素治疗Hp相关性消化性溃疡的疗效及对患者生活质量的影响,为临床治疗提供 依据。方法：选择2013 年4 月-2015 年4 月本院收治的Hp 相关消化性溃疡患者120 例,根据治疗方法不同将患者分为研究组和 对照组,每组各60 例。研究组采用阿莫西林、雷贝拉唑及克拉霉素联合治疗,对照组采用奥美拉唑单药治疗。观察并比较两组患 者的临床疗效、SDS 评分及SAS 评分。结果：研究组总有效率显著高于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）;研究组SDS、SAS 评 分低于对照组,差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。结论：采用阿莫西林、雷贝拉唑和克拉霉素联合治疗Hp 相关消化性溃疡具有较好的 临床疗效,能够显著改善患者的临床症状,提高生活质量,值得推广应用。     

奥美拉唑联合克拉霉素、阿莫西林对老年消化性溃疡患者胃泌素水平与外周血红细胞免疫功能的影响

目的:探讨奥美拉唑联合克拉霉素、阿莫西林对老年消化性溃疡患者胃泌素水平与外周血红细胞免疫功能的影响。方法:收集我院就诊的100例消化性溃疡患者,随机分为实验组和对照组,每组50例。对照组患者给予奥美拉唑肠溶片治疗;实验组患者给予奥美拉唑肠溶片、克拉霉素及阿莫西林胶囊治疗。观察并比较两组患者治疗前后胃泌素(Gastrin)、红细胞免疫功能(RBC-C3b、RBC-ICRRR)水平、临床疗效及不良反应。结果:与治疗前相比,两组患者治疗后胃泌素、RBC-ICRRR水平均下降,RBC-C3b水平均升高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);与对照组相比,实验组患者治疗后胃泌素、RBC-ICRRR水平较低,RBC-C3b水平较高,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);实验组患者治疗总有效率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);两组患者不良反应发生率相比,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:奥美拉唑联合克拉霉素、阿莫西林能够降低老年消化性溃疡患者胃泌素水平,改善红细胞免疫功能,临床疗效较好。     

Double-blind, Multicenter, Placebo-Controlled Evaluation Of Clarithromycin And Omeprazole For Helicobacter Pylori-Associated Duodenal Ulcer

Background. Eradication of Helicobacter pylori leads to faster ulcer healing and a significant decrease in ulcer recurrence. Clarithromycin is the most effective monotherapy for eradicating H. pylori from the gastric mucosa, and omeprazole frequently is used for the treatment of duodenal ulcer disease, prompting the interest to investigate rigorously the combination of clarithromycin and omeprazole for eradicating H. pylori. Materials and Methods. The aim of this double-blind, randomized, multicenter (n=30), multinational (n=10) study was to compare clarithromycin and omeprazole with omeprazole monotherapy for the eradication of H. pylori from the gastric mucosa, endoscopic healing, and reduction of symptoms and ulcer recurrence in patients with active duodenal ulcer. Patients with active duodenal ulcer associated with H. pylori infection were randomized to receive omeprazole, 40 mg every morning for 14 days, with either clarithromycin, 500 mg, or placebo three times daily, which was followed by omeprazole, 20 mg every morning for 14 days. Patients underwent endoscopy before enrolling in the study, immediately after finishing treatment, and at 4- to 6-week and 6-month follow-up evaluations or at the recurrence of symptoms. Results. Two hundred and eight patients with active duodenal ulcer associated with confirmed H. pylori infection were randomized to treatment with either clarithromycin and omeprazole (n=102) or omeprazole and placebo (n=106). Four to six weeks after treatment was completed, H. pylori was eradicated in 74% (95% confidence interval, 63.0%–82.4%) of patients receiving clarithromycin and omeprazole, compared with 1% (0.0%–6.2%) of patients receiving omeprazole monotherapy (p < .001). Clarithromycin resistance developed in eight patients treated with clarithromycin and omeprazole and in none given omeprazole and placebo. Ulcers, which were healed following treatment in more than 95% of study patients, recurred by the 6-month follow-up visit in 10% (5%–19%) of dual therapy recipients, compared with 50% (39%–61%) of those who took omeprazole alone (p <.001). Conclusion. Clarithromycin and omeprazole dual therapy is simple and well-tolerated and leads to consistently high eradication rates for patients with duodenal ulcer associated with H. pylori infection.     

Comparison of One or Two Weeks of Lansoprazole, Amoxicillin, and Clarithromycin in the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori

Background The simplest, most effective, and least expensive Helicobacter pylori therapy remains to be determined. Two weeks of 30 mg lansoprazole bid, 1 gm amoxicillin bid, and 500 mg clarithromycin bid (LAC2) had been shown to be an effective therapy for H. pylori. The aim of this study was to assess whether 1 week of this regimen (LAC1) would have a similar efficacy.
Materials and Methods. H. pylori -positive patients assessed histologically, by rapid urease test, microbiologically, and by a ¹³C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) were randomized to receive either LAC1 or LAC2 in a single-center open study. Patients were interviewed 1 to 3 days after completion of therapy to evaluate adverse events and compliance. Efficacy was determined by ¹³C-UBT at least 4 weeks after antibiotic therapy.
Results. Seventy evaluable patients were randomized to receive LAC1 (n = 33) and LAC2 (n = 37). Of the 33 LAC1 patients, 30 (91%) were treated successfully (95% confidence interval (CI) = 76–98%), compared with 32 of 37 (86%) in the LAC2 group (95% CI = 71–96%). There was no difference in efficacy between the two groups (Fisher's exact test p = 1.0; 95% CI =–10.3%–19.2%). Patients taking LAC1 experienced significantly fewer severe adverse events than those taking LAC2 (Mann-Whitney U test). One of 64 patients had primary resistance to clarithromycin, and treatment was unsuccessful in this case. Six of the 7 remaining treatment failures developed secondary resistance to clarithromycin.
Conclusions. LAC1 is as effective as LAC2 and is associated with less toxicity. Posttreatment clarithromycin resistance is common in patients who do not experience success with therapy.     

Triple Therapy with Lansoprazole, Clarithromycin, and Amoxicillin for the Cure of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Short Report

Background Given the therapeutic potential of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for successful cure of Helicobacter pylori infection, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of lansoprazole with clarithromycin and amoxicillin in an open-label, single-center study.
Materials and Methods. H. pylori -positive patients self-administered lansoprazole, 30 mg; clarithromycin, 500 mg; and amoxicillin, 1 gm bid for 14 days. Patients were assessed pretreatment, at which time the presence of H. pylori was documented by rapid urease test, culture, or histology, following study drug administration (week 2) for a brief evaluation only, and at least 4 weeks posttreatment (week 6), which included endoscopy with collection of biopsy specimens for culture and histology testing.
Results. Primary clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance were observed in 6% (2 of 30) and 43% (13 of 30) of study patients, respectively. One month after the end of therapy, H. pylori infection was cured in 23 of 25 patients (92%; 95% confidence interval, 74%-99%). The triple-therapy regimen was well-tolerated; 17% of patients (5 of 30) reported mild to moderate adverse effects during the treatment period.
Conclusion. A 2-week, triple-drug combination of lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin is highly effective for cure of H. pylori infection. Additionally, the triple-drug combination was well-tolerated by patients infected with H. pylori.