Adenoviral gene therapy, radiation, and prostate cancer

Viral gene therapy has exceptional potential as a specifically tailored cancer treatment. However, enthusiasm for cancer gene therapy has varied over the years, partly owing to safety concerns after the death of a young volunteer in a clinical trial for a genetic disease. Since this singular tragedy, results from numerous clinical trials over the past 10 years have restored the excellent safety profile of adenoviral vectors. These vectors have been extensively studied in phase I and II trials as intraprostatically administered agents for patients with locally recurrent and high-risk local prostate cancer. Promising therapeutic responses have been reported in several studies with both oncolytic and suicide gene therapy strategies. The additional benefit of combining gene therapy with radiation therapy has also been realized; replicating adenoviruses inhibit DNA repair pathways, resulting in a synergistic sensitization to radiation. Other, nonreplicating suicide gene therapy strategies are also significantly enhanced with radiation. Combined radiation/gene therapy is currently being studied in phase I and II clinical trials and will likely be the first adenoviral gene therapy mechanism to become available to urologists in the clinic. Systemic gene therapy for metastatic disease is also a major goal of the field, and clinical trials are currently under way for hormone-resistant metastatic prostate cancer. Second- and third-generation "re-targeted" viral vectors, currently being developed in the laboratory, are likely to further improve these systemic trials.     

The role of medical physics in prostate cancer radiation therapy

Medical physics, both as a scientific discipline and clinical service, hugely contributed and still contributes to the advances in the radiotherapy of prostate cancer. The traditional translational role in developing and safely implementing new technology and methods for better optimizing, delivering and monitoring the treatment is rapidly expanding to include new fields such as quantitative morphological and functional imaging and the possibility of individually predicting outcome and toxicity. The pivotal position of medical physicists in treatment personalization probably represents the main challenge of current and next years and needs a gradual change of vision and training, without losing the traditional and fundamental role of physicists to guarantee a high quality of the treatment. The current focus issue is intended to cover traditional and new fields of investigation in prostate cancer radiation therapy with the aim to provide up-to-date reference material to medical physicists daily working to cure prostate cancer patients. The papers presented in this focus issue touch upon present and upcoming challenges that need to be met in order to further advance prostate cancer radiation therapy. We suggest that there is a smart future for medical physicists willing to perform research and innovate, while they continue to provide high-quality clinical service. However, physicists are increasingly expected to actively integrate their implicitly translational, flexible and high-level skills within multi-disciplinary teams including many clinical figures (first of all radiation oncologists) as well as scientists from other disciplines.     

Micronuclei in lymphocytes of prostate cancer patients undergoing radiation therapy

To further verify the applicability of the micronucleus (MN) assay in biodosimetry, we measured the MN yield in cytokinesis-blocked (CB) peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) of eight prostate cancer (PC) patients. These patients had no previous chemotherapy or radiotherapy (xRT). They were treated with standardized schemes of fractionated pelvic xRT. Before xRT, and at one random time-point during the course of xRT, blood samples were collected from each patient for the following purposes: (1) to verify the relationship between the MN yield in PBL and the estimated equivalent (EQ) total-body absorbed dose; and (2) to evaluate the individual differences of ex vivo radiation dose-response (1-4 Gy) relationship of MN yield in PBL before xRT. The number of xRT fractions, cumulative tumor dose, and EQ total-body absorbed doses of these patients represented a wide range. We found in PBL of these patients that (1) MN yield (Y) increased linearly with the estimated EQ total-body absorbed dose as Y=14.6+9.2D (R(2)=0.7, p=0.007); the distributions of MN yield were overdispersed; the ratio of relative increment of MN yield per 1000 binucleated (BN) PBL ranged from 0.9 to 8.2 (median: 4.1) folds above that of the respective baseline levels; and (2) before xRT, the MN yields also increased linearly with the ex vivo radiation dose; at each radiation dose level, the distributions of MN yield were overdispersed in most patients. In two of the three patients with xRT-induced early side effects (cystitis, diarrhea), the MN yield in PBL induced by ex vivo irradiation before xRT was significantly higher than in the other patients without xRT-induced side effects. These findings suggest that MN yields in CB PBL can be used as an in vivo biodosimeter. Since the differences in individual ex vivo radiation dose-response relationship of MN yield in PBL before xRT appeared to be significant, our preliminary results also suggest that it may be possible to identify individual intrinsic radiosensitivity before the start of xRT.     

Newer potential biomarkers in prostate cancer

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening has led to a significant rise in the number of men diagnosed with prostate cancer and an associated increase in biopsies performed. Despite its limitations, including a positive predictive value of only 25%-40%, PSA remains the only generally accepted biomarker for prostate cancer. There is a need for better tools to not only identify men with prostate cancer, but also to recognize those with potentially lethal disease who will benefit from intervention. A great deal of work has been done worldwide to improve our knowledge of the genetics behind prostate cancer and the specificity of PSA by developing assays for different PSA isoforms. Common genetic alterations in prostate cancer patients have been identified, including CpG hypermethylation of GSPT1 and TMPRSS2:ERG gene fusion. Serum and urine detection of RNA biomarkers (eg, PCA3) and prostate cancer tissue protein antibodies (eg, EPCA) are being evaluated for detection and prognostic tools. This article reviews some of the promising developments in biomarkers.     

Selecting treatment for high-risk, localized prostate cancer: the case for radiation therapy

Prostate cancers that clinically appear to be localized may nonetheless respond poorly to curative treatment. Pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, biopsy Gleason score, and percentage of positive biopsies are all at least as important as clinical stage in predicting treatment outcome. A patient with a nonpalpable tumor, stage T1c disease, serum PSA of 12 ng/mL, and a Gleason score of 8 to 10 in 2 of 12 biopsy cores has a relatively poor prognosis. In a high-risk patient such as this one, the recommended treatment strategy involves a combination of brachytherapy and conformal external beam radiotherapy. In studies comparing treatments in patients stratified according to a variety of risk measures, this combination has shown biochemical disease-free survival rates superior to those seen following radical prostatectomy. The role of androgen suppression remains unclear.     

Hormonal therapy for prostate cancer

Updates on hormonal therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer are presented. The most common therapy is to reduce testosterone to castrate levels. A dosage of 1 mg diethylstilbestrol daily prolonged survival in patients with advanced prostate cancer. The leuteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists have essentially replaced surgical orchiectomy in the vast majority of clinical settings; however, a major problem with the leuteinizing hormone- releasing hormone agonists has been the surge and flare of testosterone levels. If hormonal therapy is initiated early, the risk of major complications is significantly decreased. Combined androgen blockade is better than monotherapy, although there is only a small clinical benefit. When androgen deprivation is used for a short time and the normal androgen milieu is re-established, the side effects and toxicity of androgen deprivation are decreased. The major complications of androgen deprivation include hot flushes, reduction of bone mineral density, osteoporosis, and anemia. Intermittent androgen blockade might have the same benefits of total androgen suppression with fewer side effects, increased duration of androgen dependence, and less cost. The 10 steps to take when advising patients about initiation of androgen deprivation therapy are reviewed.     

DC therapy for prostate cancer

The wide range of currently available treatments for metastatic prostate cancer have demonstrated a modest palliative effect, but none to date has shown an increase in overall survival. The immune system has evolved to protect against infection, however, the modulation of this system represents the possibility of allowing it to identify and destroy cancer cells. The immune system is capable of inciting a powerful immune response against tissues, in the form of transplant rejection, and the potential exists to harness these powers to fight against tumors. Modest clinical responses have been seen in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with DC therapies; however, no increase in overall survival has been demonstrated. The current state of DC immunotherapy for prostate cancer is reviewed.     

NMR-based metabolomics approach to target biomarkers for human prostate cancer

In the era of genomics and proteomics, metabolomics offers a unique way to probe the underlying biochemistry of malignant transformations. In the context of oncological metabolomics, the study of the global variation of metabolites involved in the development and progression of cancers, few existing techniques offer as much potential to discover biomarkers as nuclear magnetic resonance techniques. The most fundamental magnetic resonance methodologies with regard to human prostate cancer are magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Recent in vivo explorations have examined crucial metabolites that may indicate cancerous lesions and have the potential to direct treatment; while ex vivo studies of prostatic fluids and tissues have defined novel diagnostic parameters and indicated that magnetic resonance methodologies will be paramount in future prostate cancer management.     

NMR-based metabolomics approach to target biomarkers for human prostate cancer

In the era of genomics and proteomics, metabolomics offers a unique way to probe the underlying biochemistry of malignant transformations. In the context of oncological metabolomics, the study of the global variation of metabolites involved in the development and progression of cancers, few existing techniques offer as much potential to discover biomarkers as nuclear magnetic resonance techniques. The most fundamental magnetic resonance methodologies with regard to human prostate cancer are magnetic resonance spectroscopy and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Recent in vivo explorations have examined crucial metabolites that may indicate cancerous lesions and have the potential to direct treatment; while ex vivo studies of prostatic fluids and tissues have defined novel diagnostic parameters and indicated that magnetic resonance methodologies will be paramount in future prostate cancer management.     

Tissue disposition of 5-o-carboranyluracil--a novel agent for the boron neutron capture therapy of prostate cancer

The carboranyl nucleotides beta-D-5-o-carboranyl-2'-deoxyuridine (D-CDU), 1-(beta-L-arabinosyl)-5-o-carboranyluracil (D-ribo-CU) and the nucleotide base 5-o-carboranyluracil (CU), were developed as sensitizers for boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT). A structure activity study was initiated to determine the agent most suitable for targeting prostate tumors. Cellular accumulation studies were performed using LNCaP human prostate tumor cells, and the respective tumor disposition profiles were investigated in male nude mice bearing LNCaP and 9479 human prostate tumor xenografts in their flanks. D-CDU achieved high cellular concentrations in LNCaP cells and up to 2.5% of the total cellular compound was recovered in the 5'-monophosphorylated form. In vivo concentrations of D-CDU were similar in LNCaP and 9479 tumor xenografts. Studies in 9479 xenografted bearing mice indicated that increasing the number of hydroxyl groups in the sugar moeity of the carboranyl nucleosides corresponded with an increased rate and extent of renal elimination, shorter serum half-lives and an increased tissue specificity. Tumor/normal prostate ratios were greatest with the nucleoside base CU. These studies indicate that similar nucleoside analogues and bases may have different tissue affinities and retention properties, which should be considered when selecting agents for sensitizing specific tumors for eventual BNCT treatment. CU was found to be the most suitable compound for further development to treat prostate cancer.     

Preliminary evaluation of prostate cancer metastatic risk biomarkers

Prostate cancer patients at high risk of metastasis need to be identified as early as possible since metastasis is invariably fatal. Treatment could be tailored to risk. Recent array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) studies of primary and metastatic prostate tumors identified 39 BAC clones capable of detecting genomic signatures of metastasis. We termed these loci the genomic evaluators of metastatic CaP (GEMCaP). Risk assessments were made on a set of men who were managed with radical prostatectomy. We compared the utility of GEMCaP loci and the Kattan nomogram, a common risk assessment tool, in relation to biochemical outcome. This preliminary evaluation experiment suggests we can use aCGH to detect genomic signatures of metastasis in primary tumors with an accuracy of 78%. The classification accuracy for the Kattan nomogram was 75%. Therefore, validation of GEMCaP is warranted in a larger, appropriately designed cohort.     

Nuclear matrix proteins as biomarkers in prostate cancer

The nuclear matrix (NM) is the structural framework of the nucleus that consists of the peripheral lamins and pore complexes, an internal ribonucleic protein network, and residual nucleoli. The NM contains proteins that contribute to the preservation of nuclear shape and its organization. These protein components better known as the NM proteins have been demonstrated to be tissue specific, and are altered in many cancers, including prostate cancer. Alterations in nuclear morphology are hallmarks of cancer and are believed to be associated with changes in NM protein composition. Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed cancer in American men and many investigators have identified unique NM proteins that appear to be specific for this disease. These NM protein changes are associated with the development of prostate cancer, as well as in some cases being indicative of cancer stage. Identification of these NM proteins specific for prostate cancer provides an insight to understanding the molecular changes associated with this disease. This article reviews the role of NM proteins as tumor biomarkers in prostate cancer and the potential application of these proteins as therapeutic targets in the treatment of this disease.     

CYP17 inhibitors for prostate cancer therapy

Prostate cancer (PC) is now the second most prevalent cause of death in men in the USA and Europe. At present, the major treatment options include surgical or medical castration. These strategies cause ablation of the production of testosterone (T), dihydrotestosterone (DHT) and related androgens by the testes. However, because these procedures do not affect adrenal, prostate and other tissues' androgen production, they are often combined with androgen receptor antagonists to block their action. Indeed, recent studies have unequivocally established that in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) many androgen-regulated genes become re-expressed and tissue androgen levels increase despite low serum levels. Clearly, inhibition of the key enzyme which catalyzes the biosynthesis of androgens from pregnane precursors, 17α-hydroxy/17,20-lyase (hereafter referred to as CYP17) could prevent androgen production from all sources. Thus, total ablation of androgen production by potent CYP17 inhibitors may provide effective treatment of prostate cancer patients. This review highlights the role of androgen biosynthesis in the progression of prostate cancer and the impact of CYP17 inhibitors, such as ketoconazole, abiraterone acetate, VN/124-1 (TOK-001) and TAK-700 in the clinic and in clinical development. Article from the special issue on Targeted Inhibitors.