Simultaneous measurement of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone and luteinizing hormone during estradiol-induced luteinizing hormone surges in the ovariectomized ewe

Sequential bleeding and push-pull perfusion of the hypothalamus were used to characterize luteinizing hormone (LH) and LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) release in ovariectomized (OVX) ewes after injection of corn oil or estradiol benzoate (EB). Push-pull cannulae were surgically implanted into the stalk median eminences of 24 OVX ewes. Seven to 14 days later each of 20 animals was given an i.m. injection of 50 micrograms EB. Blood samples and push-pull perfusate were collected at 10-min intervals for 6-12 h beginning 12-15 h after EB injection. Four OVX ewes were given i.m. injections of corn oil 7 days after implantation of push-pull cannulae. Blood samples and push-pull perfusate were collected at 10-min intervals for 4 h between 18 and 22 h after injection of corn oil. Luteinizing hormone remained below 2 ng/ml throughout most of the sampling periods in 9 of 20 EB-treated ewes. In 5 of these 9 LHRH also was undetectable, whereas in 4 LHRH was detectable (1.84 +/- 0.29 pg/10 min), but did not increase with time. Preovulatory-like surges of LH occurred in 11 EB-treated ewes, but LHRH was undetectable in 5. In 4 of 6 ewes showing LH surges and detectable LHRH, sampling occurred during the onset of the LH surge.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Negative effect of estradiol on luteinizing hormone throughout the ovulatory luteinizing hormone surge in mares

The negative effect of estradiol-17beta (E2) on LH, based on exogenous E2 treatments, and the reciprocal effect of LH on endogenous E2, based on hCG treatments, were studied throughout the ovulatory follicular wave during a total of 103 equine estrous cycles in seven experiments. An initial study developed E2 treatment protocols that approximated physiologic E2 concentrations during the estrous cycle. On Day 13 (ovulation = Day 0), when basal concentrations of E2 and LH precede the ovulatory surges, exogenous E2 significantly depressed LH concentrations to below basal levels. Ablation of all follicles > or = 10 mm when the largest was > or =20 mm resulted in an increase in percentage change in LH concentration within 8 h that was greater (P < 0.03) than for controls or E2-treated/follicle-ablated mares. Significant decreases in LH occurred when E2 was given when the largest follicle was either > or =25 mm, > or =28 mm, > or =35 mm, or near ovulation. Treatment with 200 or 2000 IU of hCG did not affect E2 concentrations during the initial portion of the LH surge (largest follicle, > or =25 mm), but 2000 IU significantly depressed E2 concentrations before ovulation (largest follicle, > or =35 mm). Results indicated a continuous negative effect of E2 on LH throughout the ovulatory follicular wave and may be related to the long LH surge and the long follicular phase in mares. Results also indicated that a reciprocal negative effect of LH on E2 does not develop until the E2 surge reaches a peak.     

Adrenal luteinizing hormone releasing hormone receptors.

Paraffin sections of mouse adrenals processed with antiserum to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) in the unlabeled antibody enzyme method reveal moderate staining in the cytoplasm of cells of zona fasciculata and reticularis. The stain is intensified upon pretreatment of sections with LHRH. Pretreated sections processed with solid phase immunoabsorbed LHRH are unstained. Analogues of LHRH deficient in the C-terminal glycine amide inhibit staining, while analogues deficient in the N-terminal pyroglutamic acid have no effect. It is concluded that the adrenal contains receptors for a ligand resembling LHRH in receptor and immunoreactivity. The possibility is considered that the ligand may be an inhibitor of pineal origin.     

Hypothalamic deafferentation and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone effects on secretion of luteinizing hormone in prepubertal pigs

The control of luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion was investigated in ovariectomized, prepubertal Yorkshire pigs by comparing the effects of anterior (AHD), complete (CHD), and posterior (PHD) hypothalamic deafferentation to sham-operated controls (SOC). Gilts (n = 16) were assigned randomly to treatments, fitted with an indwelling jugular catheter, and ovariectomized 2 days before deafferentation or sham-operation (Day 0). Blood for radioimmunoassay (RIA) of LH was collected sequentially at 20-min intervals for a period of 2 h before and 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after hypothalamic deafferentation or SOC. Episodic LH release after AHD or CHD was abolished (p less than 0.01), but not after PHD or SOC. Concentrations of serum LH in AHD and CHD dropped (p less than 0.01) at 24 and 48 h after surgery. Levels of LH before and after surgery in PHD and SOC were similar (p greater than 0.05). Infusion of 25 micrograms LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) i.v. at 72 and 96 h after hypothalamic deafferentation and SOC increased (p less than 0.01) serum LH to peak levels within 15 min. after infusion; LH returned to basal levels 60-80 min later. By 96 h after surgery, LH response to LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) was less in AHD and CHD as compared with the response at 72 h postinjection. Concentrations of LH in PHD and SOC were similar (p greater than 0.05) at 72 and 96 h, respectively. The results from this study clearly indicate that neural stimuli originating or traversing the neural areas rostral to the median eminence are required for secretion of LH in the pig.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone on gonadotrophins in the hamster

The changes in serum gonadotrophins in male hamsters following one injection of 15 μg luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) (Group A) were compared with those following the last injection of LHRH in animals receiving an injection approximately every 12 hr for 4 days (Group B) or 12 days (Group C). Peak follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) levels (ng/ml) were 1776±218 (Group A), 2904±346 (Group B), and 4336±449 (Group C). Peak luteinizing hormone (LH) values (ng/ml) were 1352±80 (Group A), 410±12 (Group B), and 498±53 (Group C). Serum FSH:LH ratios, calculated from the concentrations measured 16 hr after the last LHRH injections, were higher in Groups B and C than in Group A. Similar injections of LHRH (100 ng or 15 μg/injection) for 6 days elevated the serum FSH:LH ratio in intact males. Five such LHRH injections (100 ng/injection) blunted the rise in serum LH in orchidectomized hamsters. Direct effects of LHRH on gonadotrophin secretory dynamics or altered brain-pituitary-testicular interactions may alter the ratio of FSH to LH in the hamster.     

The action of luteinizing hormone on the testis

Luteinizing hormone (LH) and human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) receptors are coupled to intracellular effector systems, most notably adenylate cyclase, through guanyl nucleotide-binding proteins or G-proteins. The molecular mechanism involved in the dynamic coupling of the LH/hCG receptor however, are not known. It has been postulated that receptor aggregation at the molecular level plays a critical role in this process. There have been attempts to understand the receptor association and dissociation phenomena at the molecular level. One of them involves the participation of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I antigen in the mechanism of receptor activation and/or expression. One molecular basis for these mechanisms consists of a physical interaction between MHC proteins and receptors to form "compound receptors" able to transfer a hormonal signal to the cell. Using a photo-reactive probe we demonstrated that the LH/hCG receptors and the class I antigens are closely associated in the membrane. Thus, it is possible to form covalent complexes of hCG and class I antigens through the binding of the hormone to specific receptors. These findings imply that LH/hCG receptors and the MHC class I antigens may interact at the level of the plasma membrane in the mechanism of LH action. We also performed experiments using a single cell and limiting stimulation to a patch of membrane. The results stimulating the cell in a localized area suggested that even if all components are entirely free to float there is a constraint in the localization of the receptor, G-protein, and/or the effector, supporting the constraint dissociation model. Within a limited area subunits could dissociate, but they would not be free to diffuse throughout the membrane. Moreover the concept of compartmentalization that has been utilized to explain some inconsistencies in second-messenger action now can be proved by experimental design.     

The structural features of effective antagonists of the luteinizing hormone releasing hormone

Summary The structure-activity data of 6 years on 395 analogs of the luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LHRH) have been studied to determine effective substituents for the ten positions for maximal antiovulatory activity and minimal histamine release. The numbers of substituents studied in the ten positions are as follows: (41)¹-(12)²-(12)³-(5)⁴-(47)⁵-(52)⁶-(16)⁷-(18)⁸-(4)⁹-(8)¹⁰. In position 1, DNal and DQal were effective with the former being more frequently the better substituent. DpClPhe was uniquely effective in position 2. Positions 3 and 4 are very sensitive to change. D3Pal in position 3 and Ser in position 4 of LHRH were in the best antagonists. PicLys and cPzACAla were the most successful residues in position 5 with cPzACAla being the better substituent. Position 6 was the most flexible and many substituents were effective; particularly DPicLys. Leu⁷ was most often present in the best antagonists. In position 8, Arg was effective for both antiovulatory activity and histamine release; ILys was effective for potency and lesser histamine release. Pro⁹ of LHRH was retained. DAlaNH₂ ¹⁰ was in the best antagonists.Abbreviations AABLys N -(4-acetylaminobenzoyl)lysine - AALys N -anisinoyl-lysine - AAPhe 3-(4-acetylaminophenyl)lysine - Abu 2-aminobutyric acid - ACLys N -(6-aminocaproyl)lysine - ACyh 1-aminocyclohexanecarboxylic acid - ACyp 1-aminocyclopentanecarboxylic acid - Aile alloisoleucine - AnGlu 4-(4-methoxy-phenylcarbamoyl)-2-aminobutyric acid - 2ANic 2-aminonicotinic acid - 6ANic 6-aminonicotinic acid - APic 6-aminopicolinic acid - APh 4-aminobenzoic acid - APhe 4-aminophynylalanine - APz 3-amino-2-pyrazinecarboxylic acid - Aze azetidine-2-carboxylic acid - Bim 5-benzimidazolecarboxylic acid - BzLys N -benzoyllysine - Cit citrulline - Cl₂Phe 3-(3,4-dichlorphenyl)alanine - cPzACAla cis-3-(4-pyrazinylcarbonylaminocyclohexyl)alnine - cPmACAla cis-3-[4-(4-pyrimidylcarbonyl)aminocyclohexyl]alanine - Dbf 3-(2-dibenzofuranyl)alanine - DMGLys N -(N,N-dimethylglycyl)lysine - Dpo N -(4,6-dimethyl-2-pyrimidyl)-ornithine - F₂Ala 3,3-difluoroalanine - hNal 4-(2-naphthyl)-2-aminobutyric acid - HOBLys N -(4-hydroxybenzoyl)lysine - hpClPhe 4-(4-chlorophenyl)-2-amino-butyric acid - Hse homoserine, 2-amino-4-hydroxybutanoic acid - ICapLys N -(6-isopropylaminocaproyl)lysine - ILys N -isopropyllysine - Ind indoline-2-carboxylic acid - INicLys N -isonicotinoyllysine - IOrn N -isopropylornithine - Me₃Arg N^G,N^G,N^G-trimethylarginine - Me₂Lys N ,N -dimethyllysine - MNal 3-[(6-methyl)-2-naphtyl]alanine - MNicLys N -(6-methylpicolinoyl)lysine - MPicLys N -(6-methylpicolinoyl)lysine - MOB 4-methoxybenzoyl - MpClPhe N-methyl-3-(4-chlorphenyl)lysine - MPZGlu glutamic acid,-4-methylpiperazine - Nal 3-(2-naphthyl)alanine - Nap 2-naphthoic acid - NicLys N -nicotinoyllysine - NO₂B 4-nitrobenzoyl - NO₂Phe 3-(4-nitrophenyl)alanine - oClPhe 3-(2-chlorphenyl)alanine - Opt O-phenyl-tyrosine - Pal 3-(3-pyridyl)alanine - 2Pal 3-(2-pyridyl)alanine - 2PALys N -(3-pyridylacetyl)lysine - pCapLys N -(6-picolinoylaminocaproyl)lysine - pClPhe 3-(4-chlorophenyl)alanine - pFPhe 3-(4-fluorophenyl)-alanine - Pic picolinic acid - PicLys N -picolinoyllysine - Pip piperidine-2-car-boxylic acid - PmcLys N -(4-pyrimidylcarbonyl)lysine - Ptf 3-(4-trifluromethyl phenyl)alanine - Pz pyrazinecarboxylic acid - PzAla 3-pyrazinylalanine - PzAPhe 3-(4-pyrazinylcarbonylaminophenyl)alanine - Qal 3-(3-quinolyl)alanine - Qnd-Lys N -quinaldoyllysine - Qui 3-quinolinecarboxylic acid - Qux 2-quinoxalinecarboxylic acid - Tic 1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-carboxylic acid - TinGly 2-thienylglycine - tNACAla trans-3-(4-nicotinoylaminocyclohexyl)-alanine - tPACAla trans-3-(4-picolinoylaminocyclohexyl)alanine     

Human pineal luteinizing hormone receptors

The presence of luteinizing hormone receptors in human pineal glands from five females and three males, ranging in age from 61-89 yr, was examined by in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry. The results demonstrated the presence of these receptors at the mRNA and protein levels in all the pineal glands examined. Pineal gland luteinizing hormone receptors could potentially be involved in the regulation of melatonin synthesis.     

Human pineal luteinizing hormone receptors

The presence of luteinizing hormone receptors in human pineal glands from five females and three males, ranging in age from 61-89 yr, was examined by in situ hybridization and immunocytochemistry. The results demonstrated the presence of these receptors at the mRNA and protein levels in all the pineal glands examined. Pineal gland luteinizing hormone receptors could potentially be involved in the regulation of melatonin synthesis.     

Human placental receptors for luteinizing hormone releasing hormone

The GTPase activity of the tubulin-colchicine complex has been studied at different tubulin-colchicine concentrations. The specific activity was found to decrease at low concentrations. Several hypothesis accounting for this observation have been discarded, and the activation via collisions between two molecules of tubulin has been considered as a possible model explaining the origin and observed concentration dependence of the GTPase activity. The activation of tubulin-colchicine by unliganded tubulin or tubulin-podophyllotoxin has been investigated within this model which emphasizes the connection between some specific tubulin-tubulin interactions and the conformation of the exchangeable nucleotide site on tubulin.